Commitments and Contingencies |
12 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2025 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
| Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies We are party to various types of legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We also are subject to regulatory examinations, inquiries and investigations, and other information gathering requests. In some of the matters, indeterminate amounts are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. This variability in pleadings, together with our and our counsel’s actual experience in litigating or settling claims, leads us to conclude that the monetary relief that may be sought by plaintiffs bears little relevance to the merits or disposition value of claims. Legal actions and proceedings of all types are subject to many uncertain factors that generally cannot be predicted with assurance. Accordingly, the outcome of any given matter and the amount or range of potential loss at particular points in time is frequently difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will evaluate documentary evidence and the credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how the court will apply the law. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how opposing parties and their counsel may view the evidence and applicable law. On a quarterly basis, we review relevant information about pending legal actions and proceedings for the purpose of evaluating and revising our contingencies, accruals and disclosures. We establish an accrual only for matters when the likelihood of a loss is probable and we can reasonably estimate the amount of such loss. We are often unable to estimate the possible losses or ranges of losses, particularly for proceedings that are in their early stages of development, where plaintiffs seek indeterminate or unspecified damages, where there may be novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the proceedings, or where settlement negotiations have not occurred or progressed. Given the uncertainties involved in any action or proceeding, regardless of whether we have established an accrual, the ultimate resolution of certain of these matters may be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of our net income or loss for that period. In addition to the matters specifically described below, we are involved in a number of legal and regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business that we do not expect will have a material impact on our business or financial condition. Our bylaws provide that we indemnify officers and directors for certain liabilities incurred in connection with legal proceedings and, pursuant to our bylaws and related indemnification agreements, we have advanced costs and expenses. Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements Litigation A consolidated class action (“In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action Litigations”) and a non-class action lawsuit, Fairholme Funds v. FHFA, filed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stockholders against us, FHFA as our conservator, and Freddie Mac were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuits challenge the August 2012 amendment to each company’s senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury. Plaintiffs in these lawsuits allege that the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to the August 2012 amendments nullified certain of the stockholders’ rights and caused them harm. Plaintiffs in the class action represent a class of Fannie Mae preferred stockholders and classes of Freddie Mac common and preferred stockholders. The cases were tried before a jury at a trial that commenced on July 24, 2023. On August 14, 2023, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs and awarded damages of $299.4 million to Fannie Mae preferred stockholders. On October 24, 2023, the court held that these stockholders were entitled to receive prejudgment interest on the damage award. On March 20, 2024, the court entered final judgment and set the amount of prejudgment interest owed by Fannie Mae at $199.7 million. On April 17, 2024, the defendants filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, which the court denied on March 14, 2025. The defendants filed a notice of appeal on April 11, 2025. On April 25, 2025, plaintiffs filed a notice of cross-appeal challenging several of the court’s pretrial rulings, which they contend prevented them from seeking the full measure of their alleged damages. Until the appeal is resolved and any final judgment amount has been paid, post-judgment interest on the damages and prejudgment interest awards will accrue at a rate of 5.01%, starting on March 20, 2024, to be computed daily and compounded annually. We recognized $495 million of expense in 2023 related to the jury verdict and estimated prejudgment interest through December 31, 2023 in “Other income (expense), net.” We recognized an additional $24 million and $26 million of expense in 2024 and 2025, respectively, related to the prejudgment and post-judgment interest. Briefing on the appeal is currently scheduled to conclude in February 2026. Unconditional Purchase Commitments We have $52.9 billion in unconditional commitments related to the purchase of loans and mortgage-related securities. These are primarily mortgage commitment derivatives with maturities under one year and include both on- and off- balance sheet commitments. A portion of these have been recorded as derivatives in our consolidated balance sheets.
|