Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Life Time, Inc. et al. v. Zurich American Insurance Company On August 19, 2020, Life Time, Inc., several of its subsidiaries, and a joint venture entity, Bloomingdale Life Time Fitness LLC (collectively, the “Life Time Parties”) filed a complaint against Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) in the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin (the “District Court”) (Case No. 27-CV-20-10599) (the “Action”) seeking declaratory relief and damages with respect to Zurich’s failure under a property/business interruption insurance policy to provide certain coverage to the Life Time Parties related to the closure or suspension by governmental authorities of their business activities due to the spread or threat of the spread of COVID-19. On March 15, 2021, certain of the Life Time Parties filed a First Amended Complaint in the Action adding claims against Zurich under a Builders’ Risk policy related to the suspension of multiple construction projects. The Court granted Zurich’s dispositive motions on July 25, 2024, dismissing the Life Time Parties’ claims with prejudice, and entered judgment on July 26, 2024. The Life Time Parties appealed from that judgment to the Minnesota Court of Appeals (the “Court of Appeals”). On August 11, 2025, the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Zurich, holding that governmental closure orders were the causes of Life Time Parties’ losses under the property/business interruption policy, and not the pandemic. The Court of Appeals concluded that Life Time Parties have a coverage limit of $1.0 million per occurrence and there were 29 occurrences, reflecting the 29 different jurisdictions that issued closure orders affecting the Life Time Parties’ 150 locations. The Court of Appeals remanded the Action to the District Court for further proceedings. On September 8, 2025, Zurich petitioned the Minnesota Supreme Court for review of the decision of the Court of Appeals. On September 30, 2025, the Life Time Parties filed an opposition to Zurich’s petition for review. On October 29, 2025, the Minnesota Supreme Court denied Zurich’s petition for review. The Action will be remanded to the District Court for further proceedings, including the damages phase of this Action. The Action is subject to uncertainties, and the final outcome of the matter is not predictable with assurance. Other We are also engaged in other proceedings incidental to the normal course of business. Due to their nature, such legal proceedings involve inherent uncertainties, including but not limited to court rulings, negotiations between affected parties and governmental intervention. We establish reserves for matters that are probable and estimable in amounts we believe are adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments. Based upon the information available to us and discussions with legal counsel, it is our opinion that the outcome of the various legal actions and claims that are incidental to our business will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and the outcomes of individual matters are not predictable with assurance.

On August 19, 2020, Life Time, Inc., several of its subsidiaries, and a joint venture entity, Bloomingdale Life Time Fitness LLC (collectively, the “Life Time Parties”) filed a complaint against Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) in the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin (the “District Court”) (Case No. 27-CV-20-10599) (the “Action”) seeking declaratory relief and damages with respect to Zurich’s failure under a property/business interruption insurance policy to provide certain coverage to the Life Time Parties related to the closure or suspension by governmental authorities of their business activities due to the spread or threat of the spread of COVID-19. On March 15, 2021, certain of the Life Time Parties filed a First Amended Complaint in the Action adding claims against Zurich under a Builders’ Risk policy related to the suspension of multiple construction projects. The Court granted Zurich’s dispositive motions on July 25, 2024, dismissing the Life Time Parties’ claims with prejudice, and entered judgment on July 26, 2024. The Life Time Parties appealed from that judgment to the Minnesota Court of Appeals (the “Court of Appeals”). On August 11, 2025, the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Zurich, holding that governmental closure orders were the causes of Life Time Parties’ losses under the property/business interruption policy, and not the pandemic. The Court of Appeals concluded that Life Time Parties have a coverage limit of $1.0 million per occurrence and there were 29 occurrences, reflecting the 29 different jurisdictions that issued closure orders affecting the Life Time Parties’ 150 locations. The Court of Appeals remanded the Action to the District Court for further proceedings. On September 8, 2025, Zurich petitioned the Minnesota Supreme Court for review of the decision of the Court of Appeals. On September 30, 2025, the Life

We are also engaged in other proceedings incidental to the normal course of business. Due to their nature, such legal proceedings involve inherent uncertainties, including but not limited to court rulings, negotiations between affected parties and governmental intervention. We establish reserves for matters that are probable and estimable in amounts we believe are adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments. Based upon the information available to us and discussions with legal counsel, it is our opinion that the outcome of the various legal actions and claims that are incidental to our business will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and the outcomes of individual matters are not predictable with assurance.