NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts that the Company would have received in connection with the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company seeks to maximize the use of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to value the assets and liabilities:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

At December 31, 2024 the assets held in the Trust Account were held in an interest-bearing demand deposit account at a bank and at December 31, 2023, the assets held in the Trust Account were held in treasury funds. At December 31, 2023 the Company’s investments held in the Trust Account are classified as trading securities.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2024 and 2023 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value.

SCHEDULE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES THAT ARE MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS 

As discussed in Note 6, the fair values of the subscription liabilities related to advances made to, or on behalf of the Company under such agreements, are classified and accounted for as a financial liability of which will be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (one of the instruments is accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis under ASC 480-10, as a derivative instrument under ASC 815, or at fair value under the fair value option in ASC 825-10).

The Financial Liabilities are valued under a PWERM which fair values repayable capital investment and used a Black Scholes Model that fair values the conversion features within the convertible debt. The PWERM is a multistep process in which value is estimated based on the probability-weighted present value of various future outcomes. The estimated fair value of the Financial Liabilities Component is determined using Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the pricing models are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life and risk-free interest rate.

The key inputs of the models used to value the Company’s Subscription Agreement loan were:

SCHEDULE OF SUBSCRIPTION FINANCIAL LIABILITIES 

The change in the fair value of Subscription Agreement loans measured using Level 3 inputs is summarized as follows:

SCHEDULE OF FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL LIABILITIES 

As discussed in Note 5, the Company fair values the Loan and Transfer notes payable are classified and accounted for as a financial liability of which will be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (one of the instruments is accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis under ASC 480-10, as a derivative instrument under ASC 815, or at fair value under the fair value option in ASC 825-10);

The Financial Liabilities are valued under a Probability Weighted Expected Return Model (“PWERM”) which fair values repayable capital investment and used a Black Scholes Model that fair values the conversion features within the convertible debt. The PWERM is a multistep process in which value is estimated based on the probability-weighted present value of various future outcomes. The estimated fair value of the Financial Liabilities Component is determined using Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the pricing models are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life and risk-free interest rate. There were no draws for the year ended December 31, 2024; therefore, no valuation was required.

The key inputs of the models used to value the Company’s Loan and Transfer notes payable as of December 31, 2024 were:

SCHEDULE OF LOAN AND TRANSFER NOTE PAYABLE 

The change in the fair value of Loan and Transfer notes payable measured using Level 3 inputs, for December 31, 2024 is summarized as follows:

SCHEDULE OF FAIR VALUE OF LOAN AND TRANSFER NOTE PAYABLE 

NOTE 11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts that the Company would have received in connection with the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company seeks to maximize the use of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to value the assets and liabilities:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value.

 SCHEDULE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES THAT ARE MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

As discussed in Note 7, the fair values of the subscription liabilities related to advances made to, or on behalf of the Company under such agreements, are classified and accounted for as a financial liability of which will be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (one of the instruments is accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis under ASC 480-10, as a derivative instrument under ASC 815, or at fair value under the fair value option in ASC 825-10).

The Financial Liabilities are valued under a PWERM which fair values repayable capital investment and used a Black Scholes Model that fair values the conversion features within the convertible debt. The PWERM is a multistep process in which value is estimated based on the probability-weighted present value of various future outcomes. The estimated fair value of the Financial Liabilities Component is determined using Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the pricing models are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life and risk-free interest rate.

The key inputs of the models used to value the Company’s Subscription Agreement loans were: 

 SCHEDULE OF SUBSCRIPTION FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

The change in the fair value of Subscription Agreement loans measured using Level 3 inputs is summarized as follows:

 SCHEDULE OF FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

As discussed in Note 6, the Company fair values the Loan and Transfer notes payable are classified and accounted for as a financial liability of which will be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (one of the instruments is accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis under ASC 480-10, as a derivative instrument under ASC 815, or at fair value under the fair value option in ASC 825-10);

The Financial Liabilities are valued under a Probability Weighted Expected Return Model (“PWERM”) which fair values repayable capital investment and used a Black Scholes Model that fair values the conversion features within the convertible debt. The PWERM is a multistep process in which value is estimated based on the probability-weighted present value of various future outcomes. The estimated fair value of the Financial Liabilities Component is determined using Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the pricing models are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life and risk-free interest rate. There were no draws for the six months ended June 30, 2025; therefore, no valuation was required.

The change in the fair value of Loan and Transfer notes payable measured using Level 3 inputs is summarized as follows:

 SCHEDULE OF FAIR VALUE OF LOAN AND TRANSFER NOTE PAYABLE

As discussed in Note 7, the convertible notes are classified and accounted for as a financial liability of which will be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (one of the instruments is accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis under ASC 480-10, as a derivative instrument under ASC 815, or at fair value under the fair value option in ASC 825-10);

The Financial Liabilities are valued under a Monte Carlo Model. The estimated fair value of the Financial Liabilities Component is determined using Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the pricing models are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life and risk-free interest rate.

The key inputs of the models used to value the Company’s convertible notes as of June 30, 2025 were:

 SCHEDULE OF CONVERTIBLE NOTES

The change in the fair value of the convertible notes measured using Level 3 inputs is summarized as follows:

 SCHEDULE OF FAIR VALUE OF THE CONVERTIBLE NOTES

As discussed in Note 9, the forward purchase agreement are classified and accounted for as a financial liability of which will be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (one of the instruments is accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis under ASC 480-10, as a derivative instrument under ASC 815, or at fair value under the fair value option in ASC 825-10);

The Financial Liabilities are valued under a Probability Weighted Expected Return Model (“PWERM”) which fair values repayable capital investment and used a Black Scholes Model that fair values the conversion features within the convertible debt. The PWERM is a multistep process in which value is estimated based on the probability-weighted present value of various future outcomes. The estimated fair value of the Financial Liabilities Component is determined using Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the pricing models are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life and risk-free interest rate. There were no draws for the six months ended June 30, 2025; therefore, no valuation was required.

The change in the fair value of the forward purchase agreement measured using Level 3 inputs is summarized as follows:

 SCHEDULE OF FAIR VALUE OF THE FORWARD PURCHASE AGREEMENT