COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation From time to time, the Company is subject to ordinary routine litigation incidental to its normal business operations. The Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, except as set forth below. The Company is currently disputing amount claimed by Mel Wentz under state usury laws (see Note 3). On February 7, 2024, the Company filed suit against Justin Kimbrough and Prosperity Consultants, LLC, in the 14th Judicial District Court for Dallas County, Texas (case no. DC-24-02022), alleging fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment and other causes of action arising from the defendants’ improper receipt of shares of Company common stock under agreements which required the defendants to provide services to the Company and which services the defendants ultimately never provided. The Company is seeking monetary damages and for a constructive trust to be imposed on defendants’ shares of Company common stock and for them to be returned to the Company. The Company and Mr. Kimbrough have settled the claims in dispute and are working to effect the settlement terms before dismissal. On April 12, 2024, the Company filed suit against Richard Saied, in the 192nd Judicial District Court for Dallas County, Texas (case no. DC-24-05442), alleging fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment and other causes of action arising from the defendant’s improper receipt of shares of Company common stock under an agreement which required the defendant to provide services to the Company and which services the defendant ultimately never provided. The Company is seeking monetary damages and for a constructive trust to be imposed on defendant’s shares of Company common stock and for them to be returned to the Company. On October 13, 2024, Judith Miller sent the Company a letter demanding payment for amounts she claimed she was owed under her prior employment agreement with the Company. The Company disputes the allegations in the letter and intends to defend itself as necessary.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2024

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

From time to time, the Company is subject to ordinary routine litigation incidental to its normal business operations. The Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, except as set forth below.

The Company is currently disputing amount claimed by Mel Wentz under state usury laws (see Note 3).

On February 7, 2024, the Company filed suit against Justin Kimbrough and Prosperity Consultants, LLC, in the 14th Judicial District Court for Dallas County, Texas (case no. DC-24-02022), alleging fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment and other causes of action arising from the defendants’ improper receipt of shares of Company common stock under agreements which required the defendants to provide services to the Company and which services the defendants ultimately never provided. The Company is seeking monetary damages and for a constructive trust to be imposed on defendants’ shares of Company common stock and for them to be returned to the Company. The Company and Mr. Kimbrough have settled the claims in dispute and are working to effect the settlement terms before dismissal.

On April 12, 2024, the Company filed suit against Richard Saied, in the 192nd Judicial District Court for Dallas County, Texas (case no. DC-24-05442), alleging fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment and other causes of action arising from the defendant’s improper receipt of shares of Company common stock under an agreement which required the defendant to provide services to the Company and which services the defendant ultimately never provided. The Company is seeking monetary damages and for a constructive trust to be imposed on defendant’s shares of Company common stock and for them to be returned to the Company.

On October 13, 2024, Judith Miller sent the Company a letter demanding payment for amounts she claimed she was owed under her prior employment agreement with the Company. The Company disputes the allegations in the letter and intends to defend itself as necessary.