As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, for the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company had:

Additionally, at June 30, 2025, the Company had:

The Company anticipates that it will need to raise additional capital immediately in order to continue to fund its operations. The Company has relied on related parties for debt-based funding of its operations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. There is also no assurance that the amount of funds the Company might raise will enable the Company to complete its initiatives or attain profitable operations.

The Company’s operating needs include the planned costs to operate its business, including amounts required to fund working capital and capital expenditures. The Company’s future capital requirements and the adequacy of its available funds will depend on many factors, including the Company’s ability to successfully expand to new markets, competition, and the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or acquire other companies to enhance or complement its product and service offerings.

There can be no assurances that financing will be available on terms which are favorable, or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional funding to meet its working capital needs in the future, it will be forced to delay, reduce, or cease its operations.

We manage liquidity risk by reviewing, on an ongoing basis, our sources of liquidity and capital requirements. The Company had cash on hand of $0 at June 30, 2025.

The Company has historically incurred significant losses since inception and has not demonstrated an ability to generate sufficient revenues from the sales of its products and services to achieve profitable operations. In making this assessment we performed a comprehensive analysis of our current circumstances including: our financial position, our cash flows and cash usage forecasts for the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, and our current capital structure including equity-based instruments and our obligations and debts.

These factors create substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within the twelve-month period subsequent to the date that these financial statements are issued.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the financial statements have been prepared on a basis that assumes the Company will continue as a going concern and which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business.

Management’s strategic plans include the following: 

The Company follows ASC 280, Segment Reporting, which requires public entities to report financial and descriptive information about their reportable operating segments.

ASC 280-10-50-1 states that an operating segment is a component of a public entity that:

A public entity is required to report separately only those operating segments that meet certain quantitative thresholds. However, if a company’s business activities are managed as a single operating segment and reviewed on that basis, the company may report as a single segment. The Company has determined that it operates as one reportable segment, as its CODM reviews the business as a whole rather than by distinct business components.

Customers in the United States accounted for 100% of our revenues. We do not have any property or equipment outside of the United States.

Application of ASU 2023-07 – Segment Expense Disclosure Requirements

In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, which enhances segment reporting by requiring public entities to disclose significant segment expenses that are regularly reviewed by the CODM. However, under ASC 280-10-50-31, these requirements apply only to entities with multiple reportable segments. Since the Company operates as a single reportable segment, it is not required to disclose segment expenses separately.

Although ASC 280-10-50-32 allows entities to voluntarily disclose additional segment-related information, including a breakdown of expenses, the Company is not required to present individual expense categories, and has not done so, because its operations are reviewed and managed as a single segment.

The Company operates in a highly competitive industry that is subject to intense market dynamics, shifting consumer demand, and economic fluctuations. The Company’s operations are exposed to significant financial, operational, and strategic risks, including potential business disruptions, supply chain constraints, and liquidity challenges.

In accordance with ASC 275, "Risks and Uncertainties," the Company evaluates and discloses risks that could materially affect its financial condition, results of operations, and business outlook. Key factors contributing to variability in sales and earnings include:

Given these uncertainties, the Company faces challenges in accurately forecasting financial performance and may experience material risks affecting liquidity, business continuity, and long-term strategic growth. The Company continuously assesses these risks and implements measures to mitigate their potential impact.

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the purchase date and money market accounts to be cash equivalents.

At June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, the Company did not have any cash equivalents.

The Company is exposed to credit risk on its cash and cash equivalents in the event of default by the financial institutions to the extent account balances exceed the amount insured by the FDIC, which is $250,000.

At June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, the Company did not experience any losses on cash balances in excess of FDIC insured limits.

The Company evaluates and discloses significant concentrations of risk in accordance with FASB ASC 275-10, Risks and Uncertainties. These risks may arise from customer concentrations, vendor reliance, geographic dependence, or other economic factors that could materially impact the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

A concentration exists when a single customer, supplier, or market accounts for a significant portion (typically greater than 10%) of the Company’s total revenues, accounts receivable, or vendor purchases.

Customer and Sales Concentrations

The Company’s revenue stream may be dependent on a limited number of key customers. A loss of any significant customer, a decline in demand from such customers, or a deterioration in their financial condition could negatively impact the Company’s future revenues and profitability.

Accounts Receivable Concentrations

The Company extends credit to customers based on their financial strength, payment history, and other relevant factors. A significant concentration of accounts receivable from a limited number of customers could expose the Company to credit risk and potential collection issues. The Company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and may require advance payments, letters of credit, or other credit enhancements to mitigate risks.

The Company has the following concentrations related to its accounts receivable greater than 10% of their respective totals:

The company has the following concentrations related to its sales greater than 10% of their respective totals:

Management’s Risk Mitigation Strategies

To address these risks, the Company implements the following strategies:

The Company continuously monitors these risks and adjusts its business strategies to reduce its exposure to customer, credit, and supplier risks, ensuring financial stability and operational continuity.

Management evaluates the recoverability of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment exists, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360-10-35-15 “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Events and circumstances considered by the Company in determining whether the carrying value of identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable include but are not limited to significant changes in performance relative to expected operating results; significant changes in the use of the assets; significant negative industry or economic trends; and changes in the Company’s business strategy.

In determining if impairment exists, the Company estimates the undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the use and ultimate disposition of these assets.

If impairment is indicated based on a comparison of the assets’ carrying values and the undiscounted cash flows, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

There were no impairment losses for the three and six months ended June 30,  2025 and 2024, respectively.

The Company evaluates financial instruments containing characteristics of both liabilities and equity in accordance with FASB ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.

Accounting for Derivative Liabilities

Derivative liabilities are revalued at fair value at each reporting period, with changes in fair value recognized in the results of operations as a gain or loss on derivative remeasurement The Company uses a binomial pricing model to determine the fair value of these instruments.

Conversion and Extinguishment of Derivative Liabilities

When a debt instrument with an embedded conversion option (e.g., convertible debt or warrants) is converted into shares of common stock or repaid, the Company:

For equity-based derivative liabilities (e.g., warrants) that are extinguished, any remaining liability balance is reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

Reclassification of Equity Instruments to Liabilities

Equity instruments initially classified as equity may be reclassified as liabilities if they no longer meet equity classification criteria under ASC 815-40-25. In such cases, they are remeasured at fair value on the date of reclassification, with changes recognized in earnings.

Derivative Liability Balances

As of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company’s derivative liabilities were $322,710 and $338,061, respectively.

Under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 (Topic 606) “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, revenue from contracts with customers is measured based on the consideration specified in the contract with the customer, and excludes any sales incentives, discounts, rebates, and amounts collected on behalf of third parties.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to a customer and is the unit of account under Topic 606. The Company’s contracts with its customers do not include multiple performance obligations. The Company recognizes revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control over a product or service to a customer. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for such products or services.

The following represents the analysis management has considered in determining its revenue recognition policy:

Identify the contract with a customer

A contract with a customer exists when (i) the Company enters into an enforceable contract with a customer that defines each party’s rights regarding the services to be transferred and identifies the payment terms related to these services, (ii) the contract has commercial substance and, (iii) the Company determines that collection of substantially all consideration for services that are transferred is probable based on the customer’s intent and ability to pay the promised consideration. The Company applies judgment in determining the customer’s ability and intention to pay, which is based on a variety of factors including the customer’s historical payment experience or, in the case of a new customer, published credit and financial information pertaining to the customer.

Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Performance obligations promised in a contract are identified based on the services that will be transferred to the customer that are both capable of being distinct, whereby the customer can benefit from the service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available from third parties or from the Company, and are distinct in the context of the contract, whereby the transfer of the services is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract. To the extent a contract includes multiple promised services, the Company must apply judgment to determine whether promised services are capable of being distinct and distinct in the context of the contract. If these criteria are not met the promised services are accounted for as a combined performance obligation.

Determine the transaction price

The transaction price is determined based on the consideration to which the Company will be entitled in exchange for transferring services to the customer. To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing either the expected value method or the most likely amount method depending on the nature of the variable consideration. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur.

None of the Company’s contracts contain a significant financing component.

Allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract

If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. However, if a series of distinct services that are substantially the same qualifies as a single performance obligation in a contract with variable consideration, the Company must determine if the variable consideration is attributable to the entire contract or to a specific part of the contract. For example, a bonus or penalty may be associated with one or more, but not all, distinct services promised in a series of distinct services that forms part of a single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative standalone selling price basis unless the transaction price is variable and meets the criteria to be allocated entirely to a performance obligation or to a distinct service that forms part of a single performance obligation. The Company determines standalone selling price based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately.

If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations. 

The Company’s contracts have a distinct single performance obligation and there are no contracts with variable consideration.

Recognize revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation

Revenue is recognized at the time the related performance obligation is satisfied by transferring a promised service to a customer.

USS

Net revenues from USS primarily consist of security services provided to large residential, industrial, construction and government clients. Contracts with customers contain no incentives or discounts that could cause revenue to be allocated or adjusted over time. The Company does offer discounts, but historically the discounts have been insignificant. The Company satisfies the performance obligation for the agreed-upon period of time and location and records revenues after completion. There are no services that would be considered fulfilled over an extended period of time and necessitate different accounting treatment.

Our typical services contract for the guard business is for one month at the start of the engagement of services and then goes month-to-month thereafter.   Revenues are net 30 after the services are provided for any 30-day period.   We often times use a factoring bank on receivables due to the requirement that we front the guard expenses for the initial 30 days.  There is no required revenue recognition after the completion of the initial 30-day contract.

Gladiator

Net revenues from Gladiator primarily consisted of sales of personal protective products, including armor, plates, helmets, shields, and accessories shipped directly to customers. All revenue transactions for Gladiator comprise a single performance obligation, which consists of the sale of products to customers either through wholesale, intermediary, or direct-to-consumer channels. The company satisfies the performance obligation and records revenues when transfer of control has passed to the customer, based on the terms of sale. In all of the Companies revenue channels, transfer of control takes place at the point of sale upon shipment to customer.

Cost of sales is recognized in the same period as the related revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 705, Cost of Sales and Services. The Company regularly evaluates its cost structure to ensure efficient operational cost management.

Cost of sales primarily include automobile costs and wages/benefits paid to our employees.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method prescribed by FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. These amounts are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the periods when temporary differences reverse.

The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax balances is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10-25, which requires that a tax position be recognized in the financial statements only if it is more likely than not (greater than 50% likelihood) to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.

As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, the Company had no uncertain tax positions that qualified for recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

The Company also recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in other expense in the consolidated statement of operations. No interest and penalties were recorded for the three and six  months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets

The Company’s deferred tax assets include certain future tax benefits, such as net operating losses (NOLs), tax credits, and deductible temporary differences. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company reviews the realizability of deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if circumstances warrant, considering both positive and negative evidence.

Factors Considered in Valuation Allowance Assessment

The Company evaluates multiple factors in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, including:

While cumulative three-year losses are a strong indicator that a valuation allowance may be needed, a valuation allowance determination is not solely based on past losses—all available positive and negative evidence must be considered.

Valuation Allowance Determination

At  June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, resulting in a net carrying amount of $0. This determination was based on cumulative losses in recent years and the lack of sufficient positive evidence to support the realization of deferred tax assets in the near term.

The Company will continue to evaluate its valuation allowance each reporting period and will recognize deferred tax assets in the future if sufficient positive evidence emerges to support their realization.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, "Compensation – Stock Compensation," using the fair value-based method. Under this guidance, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the requisite service period, typically the vesting period.

ASC 718 establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also applies to transactions where an entity incurs liabilities based on the fair value of its equity instruments or liabilities that may be settled using equity instruments.

In compliance with ASU 2018-07, the Company applies the fair value method for equity instruments granted to both employees and non-employees, aligning non-employee share-based payment accounting with that of employees. The fair value of stock-based compensation is determined as of the grant date or the measurement date (i.e., when the performance obligation is completed) and is recognized over the vesting period in accordance with ASC 718.

The Company determines the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, considering the following key assumptions:

Additionally, the Company follows the guidance under ASU 2016-09, which introduced amendments to simplify certain accounting aspects of share-based compensation, including:

The Company continues to evaluate and apply the latest Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) and interpretive releases related to stock-based compensation to ensure compliance with evolving financial reporting requirements.

The Company computes earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings Per Share." The calculation of basic EPS follows the two-class method and is determined by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, including certain other shares committed to be issued.

Basic Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Basic EPS is calculated using the two-class method, as prescribed by ASC 260-10-45-60, and is computed as follows:

Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Diluted EPS is calculated under both the two-class method and the treasury stock method, and the more dilutive result is reported.

Net Loss Per Share Considerations

In computing net loss per share, unvested shares of common stock are excluded from the denominator.

Participating Securities & Share-Based Compensation

Restricted stock and RSUs granted as part of share-based compensation contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends and dividend equivalents, respectively. Therefore:

The following potentially dilutive equity securities outstanding as of June 30, 2025 and 2024 were as follows:

Warrants included as commons stock equivalents represent those that are fully vested and exercisable. 

Based on the potential common stock equivalents noted above at June 30, 2025, the Company has sufficient authorized shares of common stock (90,000,000) to settle any potential exercises of common stock equivalents.

The Company defines related parties in accordance with ASC 850, "Related Party Disclosures," and SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 4-08(k). Related parties include entities and individuals that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company.

Related parties include, but are not limited to:

A party is considered related if it has the ability to control or significantly influence the management or operating policies of the Company in a manner that could prevent either party from fully pursuing its own separate economic interests.

The Company discloses all material related party transactions, including:

Disclosures are made in accordance with ASC 850-10-50-1 through 50-6 and SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 4-08(k), which requires registrants to disclose material related party transactions and their effects on the financial position and results of operations.

During 2024, the Company determined that the balance of $7,400, which was due from a former member of Gladiator management, was uncollectible.  The Company has recorded this as bad debt expense – related party, which is a component of general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no material effect on the consolidated results of operations, stockholders’ deficit, or cash flows.