F.H. Investments

On March 18, 2024, the Company acquired F.H. Investments Inc. (“Asteria Health”) a privately held 503B manufacturer of compounded bioidentical hormones. The total consideration of $9.0 million consisted of $8.5 million in cash payments and an additional $0.5 million cash earnout payment that was contingent on meeting certain operating metrics. The Company determined that the operating metrics were met in April 2024 and a cash payment of $0.5 million was made to the former owners of Asteria Health in May 2024.

The Company accounted for this transaction as a business combination. On March 18, 2025, the Company finalized its purchase price allocation. The following table presents the final purchase price allocation to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the purchase of Asteria Health.

The excess of the total consideration over the identifiable net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill. None of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to an annual impairment test using a fair-value approach. The Company has elected to test goodwill for impairment on October 1 each year.

The identifiable intangible assets included customer relationships, a non-compete agreement and a trade name. The customer relationships were valued using the multi-period excess earnings method (“MPEEM”). The MPEEM isolates the cash flows that can be associated with the existing customer relationships and measures fair value by discounting the cash flows to present value. The non-competition agreement was valued using the with-and-without method. Under this method, the debt-free net cash flow of Asteria Health under a scenario in which the covenantor does not compete with Asteria Health was compared with the debt-free net cash flow of Asteria Health under a scenario in which the covenantor competes with Asteria Health. The difference in debt-free net cash flow

between the two scenarios was then adjusted to account for the probability that the covenantor would successfully compete with Asteria Health absent the non-competition agreement. The relief-from-royalty method was utilized to value the trade name. The relief-from-royalty method is a form of discounted cash flow analysis that is predicated upon the economic benefits provided to the owner of the intangible asset. The theoretical underpinning of the methodology is that if the intangible asset being valued were not owned by its user, then the user would have to pay the owner a royalty for the right to use the asset. The royalty is generally based upon a percentage of revenue and is a function of the right being granted and a variety of economic factors. The fair value measurements were primarily based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market and, thus, are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company determined that the carrying value of the cash earnout payment is a reasonable estimate of its fair value, due to the short-term period over which the cash earnout is expected to be earned. In determining the estimated fair value of the cash earnout payment, the Company made certain judgments, estimates and assumptions, the most significant of which was the expected period over which the specified metric would be achieved. Contingent payments are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Costs incurred to purchase Asteria Health were recognized as expenses in the period in which the costs were incurred. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Company incurred $0.4 million in acquisition-related costs, consisting primarily of legal and consulting costs and were included in selling, general and administrative expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Simpatra, LLC

On January 2, 2024, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with Simpatra, LLC (“Simpatra”) to purchase certain intellectual property and intellectual property rights. As consideration, the Company paid $1.5 million in cash payments and 389,105 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, of which 97,276 shares were being held for a period of approximately 15 months, pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, to cover certain representations and warranties. These remaining shares were issued during the second quarter of 2025. Additionally, the agreement provides for a future earnout payment of 194,553 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock upon achieving certain financial targets over a four-year period. The fair value of future earnout payment on the acquisition date was approximately $0.3 million, which is included in the total consideration. The Company accounted for the acquisition of Simpatra as an asset purchase.

The identifiable intangible assets included developed technology, customer relationships, and a trade name. The developed technology was valued using the MPEEM. The MPEEM isolates the cash flows that can be associated with the existing technology and measures fair value by discounting the cash flows to present value. The customer relationships were valued using the distributor method, a variant of the MPEEM that relies upon market-based distributor data or other appropriate market inputs to value existing customer relationships. The distributor method may also be viewed as a profit-split method, in which function-specific profit is allocated to the identified assets. The underlying theory is that a business is comprised of various functional components (such as manufacturing, distribution, and intellectual property) and that, if available, market-based data may be used to reasonably isolate the revenue, earnings, and cash flow related to these functional areas. Using distributor inputs assists with isolating cash flow attributable to the customer-related assets. The distributor method uses market-based data to support the selection of profitability and other inputs related to customer-related activities. The relief-from-royalty method was utilized to value the trade name. The relief-from-royalty method is a form of discounted cash flow analysis that is predicated upon the economic benefits provided to the owner of the intangible asset. The theoretical underpinning of the methodology is that if the intangible asset being valued were not owned by its user, then the user would have to pay the owner a royalty for the right to use the asset. The royalty is generally based upon a percentage of revenue and is a function of the right being granted and a variety of economic factors. The fair value measurements were primarily based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market and, thus, are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The future earnout payment was valued using a Monte Carlo simulation in order to project the future path of Simpatra’s revenue and the Company’s stock price over the earnout period. In determining the estimated fair value of the future earnout payment, the Company made certain judgments, estimates and assumptions, the most significant of which were the revenue volatility, the revenue discount rate, the correlation factor of Simpatra’s revenue to the Company’s equity, the Company’s stock price, the equity volatility and the risk free rate of return. The future earnout payment is classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

BioSana ID LLC

On January 29, 2024, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with BioSana ID LLC (“BioSana”) to purchase certain assets for cash consideration of $0.7 million. Additionally, the agreement provides for a future earnout payment of up to $0.1 million upon the achievement of certain operating metrics. The Company recorded a customer relationship intangible asset of $0.8 million related to this acquisition.