v3.25.2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 28, 2025
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company measures fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. In developing its fair value estimates, the Company uses the following hierarchy:

Level 1:

 

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2:

 

Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3:

 

Significant unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. Generally, these fair value measures are model-based valuation techniques such as discounted cash flows or option pricing models using the Company’s own estimates and assumptions or those expected to be used by market participants.

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

In accordance with GAAP, certain assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s assets and liabilities that are adjusted to fair value on a recurring basis are money market funds that qualify as cash equivalents, and derivative financial instruments, which may be entered into to mitigate risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates, fuel and other commodity prices and interest rates. The Company did not have derivative financial instruments during the second quarter and first half of 2025.

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company records certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as required by GAAP. Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges. In the second quarter of 2025, the Company recognized asset impairment charges of $3 million. Of these asset impairment charges, $2 million related to the impairment of operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets associated with the Company’s retail store locations, and $1 million related to the impairment of operating lease ROU assets associated with the Company’s supply chain facilities. In the first half of 2025, the Company recognized asset impairment charges of $41 million, which included impairments resulting from the approval of the Optimize for Growth restructuring plan, as well as actions taken thus far on this plan. Of these asset impairment charges, $30 million related to the impairment of operating lease ROU assets associated with the Company’s retail store locations, $3 million related to the impairment of operating lease ROU assets associated with the Company’s supply chain facilities, $5 million related to impairment of software, and the remaining $3 million related to the impairment of fixed assets. In the second quarter and first half of 2024, the Company recognized asset impairment charges of $8 million and $14 million, respectively. Of these asset impairment charges, $7 million and $12 million in the second quarter and first half of 2024, respectively, related to the impairment of operating lease ROU assets associated with the Company’s retail store locations, with the remainder relating to impairment of fixed assets. All impairment charges discussed in the sections below are presented in Asset impairments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company regularly reviews retail store assets for impairment indicators at the individual store level, as this represents the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. When indicators of impairment are present, a recoverability analysis is performed which considers the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the retail store’s remaining life and uses input from retail operations and accounting and finance personnel. These inputs include management’s best estimates of retail store-level sales, gross margins, direct expenses, exercise of future lease renewal options when reasonably certain to be exercised, and resulting cash flows that can naturally include judgments about how current initiatives will impact future performance. The assumptions used within the recoverability analysis for the retail stores were updated to consider current quarter retail store operational results and formal plans for future retail store closures as part of the Company’s Optimize for Growth restructuring plan, including the probability of closure at the retail store level. While it is generally understood that closures will approximate the store’s lease termination date, it is possible that changes in store performance or other conditions could result in future changes in assumptions utilized. These assumptions reflected declining sales over the forecast period and gross margin and operating cost assumptions that are consistent with recent actual results and consider plans for future initiatives.

If the undiscounted cash flows of a retail store cannot support the carrying amount of its assets, the assets are impaired, if necessary, and written down to estimated fair value. The fair value of retail store assets is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis which uses Level 2 unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data such as independent real estate valuation opinions. Specifically, the analysis uses assumptions of potential rental rates for each retail store location which are based on market data for comparable locations. These estimated cash flows used in the second quarter of 2025 impairment calculation were discounted at a weighted average discount rate of 7%.

The Company will continue to evaluate initiatives to improve performance and lower operating costs. There are uncertainties regarding the impact of supply chain and macroeconomic conditions on the future results of operations, including the forecast period used in the recoverability analysis. To the extent that forward-looking sales and operating assumptions are not achieved and are subsequently reduced, additional impairment charges may result. However, at the end of the second quarter of 2025, the impairment recognized reflects the Company’s best estimate of future performance.

In addition to its retail store assets, the Company also regularly evaluates whether there are impairment indicators associated with its other long-lived assets. As described above, the Company incurred a $5 million impairment charge on a software asset related to its retail business in the first half of 2025. The Company did not identify impairment indicators for any other long-lived assets as of June 28, 2025, and as a result, there were no additional associated impairment charges.

The Company’s assets held for sale as of June 28, 2025 consisted of a land asset and distribution facility totaling $12 million, and as of December 28, 2024 consisted of a $6 million land asset.

OTHER FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, trade accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.

The following table presents information about financial instruments at the balance sheet dates indicated.

 

 

June 28,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

 

2025

 

 

2024

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

(In millions)

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

$

124

 

 

$

124

 

 

$

132

 

 

$

132

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving Loan Facility loans under the Fourth Amended Credit
   Agreement, due
2029

 

 

126

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

160

 

Revenue bonds, due in varying amounts periodically
   through
2029

 

 

75

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

76

 

American & Foreign Power Company, Inc. 5% debentures,
   due
2030

 

 

16

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

Company-owned life insurance: In connection with the 2013 OfficeMax merger, the Company acquired company-owned life insurance policies on certain former employees. The fair value of the company-owned life insurance policies is derived using determinable net cash surrender value, which is the cash surrender value less any outstanding loans (Level 2 measure). Death benefits received on company-owned life insurance policies, which are tax-free at payout, typically exceed their cash surrender values.
Long-term debt: Long-term debt, for which there were no transactions on the measurement date, was valued based on quoted market prices near the measurement date when available or by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument using rates based on the most recently observable trade or using rates currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities (Level 2 measure). The carrying amount of the Revolving Loan Facility loan under the Fourth Amended Credit Agreement approximates fair value because the interest rates vary with market interest rates. Refer to Note 6 for additional information about the Fourth Amended Credit Agreement.