Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, a party to legal and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company accrues estimated costs for a contingency when management believes that a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. On December 16, 2024, a putative securities class action, captioned Operating Engineers Construction Industry Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. MGP Ingredients, Inc. et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, two of its former Chief Executive Officers and its current Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the “Operating Engineers Action”). The Operating Engineers Action was brought on behalf of a putative class who acquired publicly traded MGP common stock between May 4, 2023 and October 30, 2024. On February 13, 2025, a second putative securities class action, captioned Bronstein v. MGP Ingredients, Inc. et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the same defendants (the “Bronstein Action”). The Bronstein Action was brought on behalf of a putative class who acquired publicly traded MGP securities between May 4, 2023 and October 30, 2024. Both actions assert securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, in connection with statements made in the Company’s quarterly earnings releases and on earnings calls during the alleged class period. The Operating Engineers Action and Bronstein Action have been consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, now captioned In re MGPI Ingredients, Inc. Securities Litigation. Lead Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on May 15, 2025, which Defendants moved to dismiss on July 15, 2025. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to the claims asserted and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. On January 23, 2025, a putative derivative lawsuit captioned Sebald v. Colo, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-02034, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against two of the Company’s former Chief Executive Officers, its current Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and the members of its Board of Directors (the “Sebald Action”). On March 17, 2025, a second putative derivative lawsuit captioned Reid v. Bratcher, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-02127, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against the same defendants (the “Reid Action”). On July 1, 2025, the respective plaintiffs in these cases filed a consolidated amended complaint (the “Consolidated Action”). On May 15, 2025, a third putative derivative lawsuit captioned Kruitwagen v. Bratcher, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-02262, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against the same defendants as in the Consolidated Action. The Company is a “Nominal Defendant” in the lawsuits, which reflects the fact that the lawsuits are maintained by the respective named plaintiffs on behalf of the Company and that the plaintiffs seek damages on the Company’s behalf. The complaints allege, among other things, that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties and violated federal securities laws by causing the Company to make false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions in public filings during the class period alleged in the securities action and also allege breaches of fiduciary duties by failing to maintain internal controls. The complaints also allege breaches of fiduciary duties by seeking shareholder approval of an equity incentive plan, and causing the Company to repurchase its own stock at artificially inflated prices. The complaints bring additional claims for unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duties, and waste of corporate assets and seek indemnity and contribution from the named current and former officers. On July 24, 2025 and July 28, 2025, the Court entered orders staying the Consolidated Action and Kruitwagen, respectively, pending an outcome on the motion to dismiss filed in the putative securities class action. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to the claims asserted and intends to defend the lawsuits vigorously.

On December 16, 2024, a putative securities class action, captioned Operating Engineers Construction Industry Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. MGP Ingredients, Inc. et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, two of its former Chief Executive Officers and its current Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the “Operating Engineers Action”). The Operating Engineers Action was brought on behalf of a putative class who acquired publicly traded MGP common stock between May 4, 2023 and October 30, 2024. On February 13, 2025, a second putative securities class action, captioned Bronstein v. MGP Ingredients, Inc. et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the same defendants (the “Bronstein Action”). The Bronstein Action was brought on behalf of a putative class who acquired publicly traded MGP securities between May 4, 2023 and October 30, 2024. Both actions assert securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, in connection with statements made in the Company’s quarterly earnings releases and on earnings calls during the alleged class period. The Operating Engineers Action and Bronstein Action have been consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, now captioned In re MGPI Ingredients, Inc. Securities Litigation. Lead Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on May 15, 2025, which Defendants moved to dismiss on July 15, 2025. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to the claims asserted and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously.

On January 23, 2025, a putative derivative lawsuit captioned Sebald v. Colo, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-02034, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against two of the Company’s former Chief Executive Officers, its current Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and the members of its Board of Directors (the “Sebald Action”). On March 17, 2025, a second putative derivative lawsuit captioned Reid v. Bratcher, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-02127, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against the same defendants (the “Reid Action”). On July 1, 2025, the respective plaintiffs in these cases filed a consolidated amended complaint (the “Consolidated Action”). On May 15, 2025, a third putative derivative lawsuit captioned Kruitwagen v. Bratcher, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-02262, was filed in

the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against the same defendants as in the Consolidated Action. The Company is a “Nominal Defendant” in the lawsuits, which reflects the fact that the lawsuits are maintained by the respective named plaintiffs on behalf of the Company and that the plaintiffs seek damages on the Company’s behalf. The complaints allege, among other things, that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties and violated federal securities laws by causing the Company to make false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions in public filings during the class period alleged in the securities action and also allege breaches of fiduciary duties by failing to maintain internal controls. The complaints also allege breaches of fiduciary duties by seeking shareholder approval of an equity incentive plan, and causing the Company to repurchase its own stock at artificially inflated prices. The complaints bring additional claims for unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duties, and waste of corporate assets and seek indemnity and contribution from the named current and former officers. On July 24, 2025 and July 28, 2025, the Court entered orders staying the Consolidated Action and Kruitwagen, respectively, pending an outcome on the motion to dismiss filed in the putative securities class action. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to the claims asserted and intends to defend the lawsuits vigorously.