Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Minimum Volume Commitment In June 2022, the Company entered into a long-term supply agreement with a minimum volume commitment with a third party which provides services to process certain raw materials. Any purchase order issued under this supply agreement would have been non-cancellable. To the extent the Company failed to order the guaranteed minimum volume defined in the contract at the end of the term, the Company would have been required to pay the counterparty an amount equal to the shortfall, if any, multiplied by a fee. As part of the negotiations, during the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company paid the counterparty $1,250 as a shortfall penalty and transferred equipment with a net book value of approximately $600. As a result, the Company has been released of any minimum volume commitments as part of the original agreement. During the second quarter of 2025, the Company entered into a new long-term supply agreement with the third party for the processing of certain raw materials. The new long term-term supply agreement does not include any minimum volume commitments. Purchase Orders that have been accepted by the third party shall not be modified or canceled except upon written agreement of the parties. Legal Proceedings Class Action Complaints On August 1, 2023, a class action lawsuit (the “Houck Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of New Jersey by plaintiff William Houck (the “Houck Plaintiff”) against the Company and three individual officers: the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, its former Chief Financial Officer, and its current Chief Financial Officer (with the Company, the “Houck Defendants”). The Houck Complaint alleges that the Houck Defendants violated federal securities laws by making knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s contractual relationship with a customer and about the size of the Company’s order backlog and commercial pipeline. On November 8, 2024, the District Court granted the renewed motion to dismiss filed by the Houck Defendants. On March 13, 2025, the District Court entered the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal. The plaintiff did not appeal the Court’s final judgment and this case is considered closed. On November 5, 2024, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Hyung Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Jung Jae Hyung (the “Hyung Plaintiff”) against certain defendants including the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, and five of the Company’s current Directors and one former Director (the “Hyung Defendants”). The Hyung Complaint alleges that the Hyung Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s contractual relationship with a customer and about the size of the Company’s order backlog and commercial pipeline. As the allegations in this case are similar to those in the dismissed Houck class action lawsuit, on June 10, 2025, the parties filed a joint Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal and Proposed Order. On July 7, 2025, the Court entered the Final Order of Dismissal and this case is considered closed.

In June 2022, the Company entered into a long-term supply agreement with a minimum volume commitment with a third party which provides services to process certain raw materials. Any purchase order issued under this supply agreement would have been non-cancellable. To the extent the Company failed to order the guaranteed minimum volume defined in the contract at the end of the term, the Company would have been required to pay the counterparty an amount equal to the shortfall, if any, multiplied by a fee. As part of the negotiations, during the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company paid the counterparty $1,250 as a shortfall penalty and transferred equipment with a net book value of approximately $600. As a result, the Company has been released of any minimum volume commitments as part of the original agreement.

During the second quarter of 2025, the Company entered into a new long-term supply agreement with the third party for the processing of certain raw materials. The new long term-term supply agreement does not include any minimum volume commitments. Purchase Orders that have been accepted by the third party shall not be modified or canceled except upon written agreement of the parties.

On August 1, 2023, a class action lawsuit (the “Houck Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of New Jersey by plaintiff William Houck (the “Houck Plaintiff”) against the Company and three individual officers: the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, its former Chief Financial Officer, and its current Chief Financial Officer (with the Company, the “Houck Defendants”). The Houck Complaint alleges that the Houck Defendants violated federal securities laws by making knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s contractual relationship with a customer and about the size of the Company’s order backlog and commercial pipeline. On November 8, 2024, the District Court granted the renewed motion to dismiss filed by the Houck Defendants. On March 13, 2025, the District Court entered the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal. The plaintiff did not appeal the Court’s final judgment and this case is considered closed.

On November 5, 2024, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Hyung Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Jung Jae Hyung (the “Hyung Plaintiff”) against certain defendants including the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, and five of the Company’s current Directors and one former Director (the “Hyung Defendants”). The Hyung Complaint alleges that the Hyung Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s contractual relationship with a customer and about the size of the Company’s order backlog and commercial pipeline. As the allegations in this case are similar to those in the dismissed Houck class action lawsuit, on June 10, 2025, the parties filed a joint Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal and Proposed Order. On July 7, 2025, the Court entered the Final Order of Dismissal and this case is considered closed.