v3.25.2
Provisions
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2025
Other Provisions, Contingent Liabilities And Contingent Assets [Abstract]  
Provisions
11
Provisions
Restructuring
costs
Legal proceedings
and regulatory matters
Customer
remediation
Other
provisions
Total
$m
$m
$m
$m
$m
Provisions (excluding contractual commitments)
At 1 Jan 2025
199
295
85
457
1,036
Additions
647
79
6
69
801
Amounts utilised
(167)
(100)
(12)
(46)
(325)
Unused amounts reversed
(50)
(29)
(26)
(21)
(126)
Exchange and other movements
27
24
5
11
67
At 30 Jun 2025
656
269
58
470
1,453
Contractual commitments1
At 1 Jan 2025
688
Net change in expected credit loss provision and other movements
(16)
At 30 Jun 2025
672
Total provisions
At 31 Dec 2024
1,724
At 30 Jun 2025
2,125
1Contractual commitments include the expected credit loss provision in relation to off-balance sheet financial guarantee contracts and commitments where HSBC
has become party to an irrevocable commitment, as defined under IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’; and provisions for performance and other guarantee contracts.
Further details of ‘Legal proceedings and regulatory matters’ are set out in Note 13. Legal proceedings include civil court, arbitration or tribunal
proceedings brought against HSBC companies (whether by way of claim or counterclaim); or civil disputes that may, if not settled, result in
court, arbitration or tribunal proceedings. ‘Regulatory matters’ refers to investigations, reviews and other actions carried out by, or in response
to, the actions of regulators or law enforcement agencies in connection with alleged wrongdoing by HSBC.
Customer remediation refers to HSBC’s activities to compensate customers for losses or damages associated with a failure to comply with
regulations or to treat customers fairly. Customer remediation is often initiated by HSBC in response to customer complaints and/or industry
developments in sales practices, and is not necessarily initiated by regulatory action.
For further details of the impact of IFRS 9 on undrawn loan commitments and financial guarantees, presented in ‘Contractual commitments’,
see Note 12. Further analysis of the movement in the ECL provision is disclosed within the ‘Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/nominal
amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers including loan commitments and financial guarantees‘ table on page 55.
Brazil PIS and COFINS tax matters
Beginning in the late 1990s, HSBC Bank Brasil S.A. – Banco Múltiplo (‘HSBC Brazil’) and other financial services firms brought legal proceedings
in Brazil challenging the assessment of Contribution to the Social Integration Programme (‘PIS’) and Contribution for the Financing of Social
Security (‘COFINS’) taxes, which are federal taxes imposed on gross revenues earned by legal entities in Brazil. The Supreme Court of Brazil
selected three cases – one involving an insurer, in 2007, and two involving other banks, in 2011 – to set standards that would apply to all of
these proceedings. In June 2023, the court ruled against the financial services firms in all three cases. The standards set by the court in this
ruling have not yet been applied to HSBC Brazil’s legacy cases, liability for which remained with HSBC after the sale of HSBC’s operations in
Brazil to Bradesco in 2016. In May 2025, the first instance judicial court delivered a favourable judgment in HSBC Brazil’s second largest legacy
PIS and COFINS case. This judgment is subject to appeal by the Brazilian Tax Authority. There are many factors that may affect the range of
outcomes and any resulting financial impact for HSBC. Based upon the information currently available, a provision was recognised in respect of
one legacy case. The remaining additional tax liability subject to challenge on all legacy PIS and COFINS cases is up to $0.4bn, and no provision
has been booked for this amount.