File No. 333-178600
File No. 811-22648
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (X)
PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. ( )
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 38 (X)
and/or
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 (X)
AMENDMENT NO. 41 (X)
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
11100 Santa Monica Boulevard
Suite 600
Los Angeles, California 90025
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code)
(310) 806-4000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Robert J. Francais
Aspirant Trust
11100 Santa Monica Boulevard
Suite 600
Los Angeles, California 90025
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copy to:
W. John McGuire
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):
[ ] | Immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b) |
[X] | On August 1, 2025 pursuant to paragraph (b) |
[ ] | 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
[ ] | On (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) |
[ ] | 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) |
[ ] | On (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485 |
If appropriate check the following box:
[ ] | This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment. |
PROSPECTUS
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund
Advisor
Shares (Ticker RMEAX)
Institutional Shares (Ticker RMEIX)*
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund
(Ticker RMMBX)
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
(Ticker RMDFX)
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund
(Ticker RMTBX)
* | As of the date of this prospectus, Institutional Shares are not available for purchase. |
The Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund, the Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund, the Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund, and the Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (each, a “Fund”) are series of the Aspiriant Trust (the “Trust”) and are advised by Aspiriant, LLC (the “Adviser”).
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has not approved or disapproved these securities or passed on the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Fund Summary | 1 |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund | 1 |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund | 8 |
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 15 |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund | 22 |
Additional Information about Investment Strategies and Related Risks of the Funds | 28 |
Management of the Funds | 43 |
Valuing Shares | 46 |
Purchasing Shares | 47 |
Redeeming Shares | 50 |
Distribution of Fund Shares | 51 |
Shareholder Services Plan | 52 |
Dividends and Distributions | 52 |
Tax Information | 52 |
Financial Highlights | 54 |
FUND SUMMARY
The Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (the “Fund” or “Equity Allocation Fund”) seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation while considering federal tax implications of investment decisions.
This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy, hold, and sell shares of the Fund. You may pay other fees, such as brokerage commissions and other fees to financial intermediaries, which are not reflected in the table and expense example below.
Advisor |
Institutional | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases (as percentage of offering price) |
||
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as a percentage of net asset value) |
||
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Reinvested Dividends | ||
Redemption Fee (as percentage of amount redeemed) (on shares held for 90 days or less) |
|
Advisor |
Institutional |
Management Fees | ||
Distribution (12b-1) Fees | ||
Other Expenses | ||
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(2) | ||
Total Annual Operating Expenses | ||
Fee Waivers (3) | ( |
( |
Total Annual Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers |
(1) |
(2) |
1
(3) |
This Example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. The Example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those periods. The Example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and the Fund’s operating expenses remain the same. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions your costs would be:
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years | |
Advisor Shares | $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
Institutional Shares | $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
The
Equity Allocation Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over”
its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when shares
are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect
the Fund’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate was
Under normal conditions, the Equity Allocation Fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities. The types of equity securities the Fund may invest in include common stock, preferred stock, and depositary receipts. The Fund also may invest in securities that provide exposure to equity securities (i.e., rights, warrants, and investment company shares). The Fund will hold a broad and diverse group of equity securities of companies in countries with developed and emerging markets, which are considered developed or emerging based upon the market definition used by the MSCI ACWI Index (the “MSCI Index”). The Fund may invest in companies of any market capitalization.
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in securities that the Adviser believes offer the most attractive return vs. risk opportunities. The Fund’s assets are allocated to various sub-advisers and invested directly in other investment companies or pooled investment vehicles (“Underlying Funds”, such as U.S. and foreign open-end and closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds, and private funds) based on equity asset class forecasts used by the Adviser and its assessment of the risks of such asset classes. A key component of those forecasts is the Adviser’s expectation that valuations ultimately revert to their fundamental fair value. The Adviser changes the Fund’s allocations in response to changes in the Adviser’s investment outlook and in financial market valuations. The Adviser and sub-advisers generally will consider selling securities when other securities are identified that may result in a better opportunity.
For a portion of its investments, which may be significant, the Fund may seek to reduce the volatility of its net asset value relative to the MSCI Index, with respect to global securities, or to the S&P 500 Index (the “S&P 500” and with the MSCI Index, the “Benchmarks”), with respect to domestic securities, by using a global or domestic low volatility strategy that focuses on lower volatility equities through the use of risk models. The use of risk models refers to the use of a consistent process based on Models and Data (described below) to invest in securities that exhibit below average forecasted risk characteristics in order to achieve market-like returns with less volatility than the relevant Benchmark over a full market cycle. The Adviser considers a full market cycle to be the period between two peaks, which includes both a bear and a bull market and generally spans 7 to 10 years.
The Fund also pursues low volatility strategies by investing in Underlying Funds that seek to reduce volatility and achieve market-like returns by investing in equity securities believed to exhibit lower volatility than the relevant Benchmark over a full market cycle.
2
In addition, the Fund may use a significant portion of its assets to seek to reduce volatility relative to the MSCI Index, with respect to global securities, or to the S&P 500 Index, with respect to domestic securities, by using a global or domestic quality strategy that focuses on lower risk and high quality equities. The Fund considers high quality equities to be equities of fundamentally strong companies with established track records of historical profitability that are able to outgrow an average company over time. The global quality strategy seeks to provide diversified exposure to high quality global companies, while the domestic quality strategy seeks to provide diversified exposure to high quality U.S. companies. The quality strategy may focus on security selection that could be considered growth investing or value investing. The quality strategy may tilt a portion of the Fund’s portfolio toward stocks that have lower volatility, lower earnings variation, lower leverage, and higher earnings yield versus the MSCI Index for the global quality strategy and the S&P 500 for the domestic quality strategy.
The Fund also pursues a quality strategy by investing in Underlying Funds that seek to reduce volatility by investing in equity securities believed to be of high quality.
In addition, the Fund pursues a long/short equity strategy by investing in Underlying Funds that seek to reduce volatility and achieve capital appreciation over a full market cycle by investing long and short in domestic and global equity securities.
When investing in Underlying Funds, the Fund will bear its pro rata portion of the expenses of the Underlying Funds in addition to its own direct expenses.
Given the complexity of the investments and strategies of the Equity Allocation Fund, certain of the sub-advisers rely heavily on quantitative models (both proprietary models developed by the sub-adviser and those supplied by third parties) and information and data supplied by third parties (“Models and Data”). Models and Data are used to construct sets of transactions and investments by helping to determine the expected returns of securities.
In constructing the Fund’s investment portfolio, certain sub-advisers consider federal tax implications when making investment decisions with respect to individual securities to seek to provide a tax advantage. This approach is commonly referred to as a tax-managed approach and aims to limit the effect of federal income tax on investment returns by delaying and minimizing the realization of net capital gains and by maximizing the extent to which any realized net capital gains are long-term in nature. This tax-managed approach may only apply to a portion of the Fund’s portfolio.
Principal Risks
Because the value of your investment in the Equity Allocation Fund will fluctuate, you may lose money and there can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Fund.
Asset Allocation Risk: The Fund is subject to different levels and combinations of risks based on its actual allocation among various asset classes and underlying investments. The Fund will be exposed to risks of the asset classes, underlying investments, and financial markets in which it invests. The potential impact of the risks related to an asset class depends on the size of the Fund’s investment allocation to it at any point in time.
Emerging Markets Risk: Emerging markets involve risks in addition to and greater than those generally associated with investing in more developed foreign markets. These less developed markets can be subject to greater social, economic, regulatory, and political uncertainties and can be extremely volatile.
Foreign Securities and Currencies Risk: The prices of foreign securities, including depositary receipts and foreign funds, may decline or fluctuate because of (i) economic or political actions of foreign governments and/or (ii) less regulated or liquid securities markets. These risks are greater for emerging markets than for more developed foreign markets. Investors holding these securities are also exposed to foreign currency risk, which is the possibility that foreign currency will fluctuate in value against the U.S. dollar.
Illiquid Investments Risk: The risk that the Fund may not be able to sell a security in a timely manner at a desired price. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid.
Investment Style Risk: The risk that securities selected as part of a low volatility or quality strategy and growth or value investing style may underperform other segments of the equity markets or the equity markets as a whole. Low volatility and quality investing tend to perform differently and shift into and out of favor with investors depending on changes in market and economic conditions. Similarly, the growth or value assessment of a company may not be accurate. As a result, the Fund’s performance may at times be worse than the performance of other mutual funds that invest more broadly or in securities of a different investment style.
3
Management and Operational Risk: The Fund runs the risk that investment techniques will fail to produce desired results. The Fund also runs the risk that the assessment of an investment (including a company’s fundamental fair (or intrinsic) value) may be wrong or that deficiencies in adviser’s or another service provider’s internal systems or controls will cause losses for the Fund or impair Fund’s operations.
Market Risk: Due to market conditions, the value of the Fund’s investments may fluctuate significantly from day to day. Price fluctuations may be temporary or may last for extended periods. Local, regional, or global events such as war, acts of terrorism, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, recessions, political and regulatory changes, or other events could have a significant impact on the market generally and on specific securities. The market value of a security may also decline because of factors that affect a particular industry or industries, such as labor shortages or increased production costs and competitive conditions within an industry.
Models and Data Risk: When Models and Data prove to be incorrect or incomplete, any decisions made in reliance thereon expose the Fund to potential risks. Some of the models used by a sub-adviser for the Fund are predictive in nature. The use of predictive models has inherent risks. Because predictive models are usually constructed based on historical data supplied by third parties, the success of relying on such models may depend heavily on the accuracy and reliability of the supplied historical data.
Political and Economic Risks: The values of securities may be adversely affected by local political and economic conditions and developments. Adverse conditions in an industry significant to a local economy could have a correspondingly adverse effect on the financial condition of local issuers.
Small and Mid-Cap Company Risk: Smaller capitalization companies may be more vulnerable than larger companies to adverse business or economic developments and they may have more limited resources. Securities of small and mid-cap companies are often less liquid than those of large companies and this could make it difficult to sell such securities at a desired time or price.
Tax-Managed Investment Risk: Market conditions may limit the Fund’s ability to implement its tax-managed approach. For example, market conditions may limit the Fund’s ability to generate tax losses or to generate qualified dividend income, which is generally taxed to noncorporate shareholders at favorable rates, or dividends eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations. The Fund’s ability to utilize various tax-management techniques may be curtailed or eliminated in the future by legislation or regulation. Although the Fund expects that a smaller portion of its total return will consist of taxable distributions to shareholders as compared to non-tax managed funds, there can be no assurance about the size of taxable distributions to shareholders. The performance of the Fund may deviate from that of non-tax managed funds and may not provide as high a return before or after consideration of federal income tax consequences as non-tax managed funds.
Underlying Fund Risk: The actual cost of investing in Underlying Funds may be higher than the cost of investing in a mutual fund that only invests directly in individual securities. The Fund will bear its pro rata portion of the expenses of the Underlying Funds in addition to its own direct expenses. By investing in Underlying Funds, the Fund is subject to the risks associated with the Underlying Funds’ investments. The Fund’s investment performance is directly tied to the performance of the Underlying Funds and other investments in which the Fund invests. If one or more of the Underlying Funds fails to meet its investment objective, or otherwise performs poorly, the Fund’s performance could be negatively affected. With respect to an Underlying Fund whose shares trade on an exchange (for example, an exchange-traded fund), its shares may trade below their net asset value or at a discount, which may adversely affect the Fund’s performance. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid. Illiquid investments are subject to the risk that the Fund will not be able to sell the investments when desired or at favorable prices.
Principal Risks of Underlying Funds
Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Equity Allocation Fund as a result of its investments in the Underlying Funds. References in this section to a “fund” are to the Underlying Funds in which the Fund may invest and references to investments and securities are to those held directly by the Underlying Funds.
Counterparty Risk: Transactions involving a counterparty or third party (other than the issuer of the instrument) are subject to the counterparty’s or third party’s credit risk and ability to perform in accordance with the terms of the transaction.
Derivatives Risk: The use of derivatives by a fund can lead to losses because of adverse movements in the price or value of the asset, index, rate, instrument or economic measure underlying a derivative, due to failure of a counterparty, or due to tax or regulatory constraints. In addition, the successful use of derivatives depends in part on the future price fluctuations and the degree of correlation between the underlying securities. Unusual market conditions or the lack of a ready market for any particular derivative at a specific time may reduce the effectiveness of a fund’s derivate strategies and, for these and other reasons, a fund’s derivative strategies may not reduce the fund’s volatility to the extent desired. Derivatives for hedging purposes may not reduce risk if they are not sufficiently correlated to the position being hedged. Derivatives risk may be more significant when derivatives are used to enhance return or as a substitute for a position or security, rather than solely to hedge the risk of a position or security held by a fund. Derivatives may create economic leverage in a fund, which magnifies the fund’s exposure to the underlying investment. As a result, the loss on derivative transactions may substantially exceed the initial investment. Derivative instruments may be difficult to value, may be illiquid, and may be subject to wide swings in valuation caused by changes in the value of the underlying instrument. Derivatives that are traded “over the counter” also present credit risk (the risk that the other party to the derivative contract will not fulfill its contractual obligations, whether because of bankruptcy or other default).
4
Focused Investment Risk: Investments focused in a limited number of countries, regions, sectors, industries, or issuers (or in sectors within a country or region) that are subject to the same or similar risk factors and investments whose prices are closely correlated are subject to greater overall risk than investments that are more diversified or whose prices are not as closely correlated. If a fund invests in the securities of a limited number of issuers, a decline in the market price of a particular security held by the fund may affect the fund’s performance more than if the fund invested in the securities of a larger number of issuers.
Leverage Risk: Investments in futures, swaps, and other derivative instruments provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure, as well as the potential for greater loss. If a fund uses leverage through activities such as purchasing derivative instruments in an effort to increase its returns, it has the risk of magnified capital losses that occur when losses affect an asset base, enlarged by the creation of liabilities, that exceeds the net assets of the fund. The net asset value of a fund when employing leverage will be more volatile and sensitive to market movements. Leverage may involve the creation of a liability that requires a fund to pay interest.
Short Sale Risk: The risk that the price of a security sold short will increase in value between the time of the short sale and the time a fund must purchase the security to return it to the lender. The fund’s potential loss on a short sale could theoretically be unlimited in a case where the fund is unable, for any reason, to close out its short position.
The bar chart below shows changes in the Fund’s Advisor Shares’ performance from year-to-year.
* | Advisor
Shares |
(%)
|
5
The
table below shows how the Fund’s average annual total returns for the periods indicated compare with those of a broad measure
of market performance.
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years | |
Advisor Shares | |||
Total Return Before Taxes | |||
Return After Taxes on Distribution | |||
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | |||
MSCI ACWI (reflects no deduction of fees, expenses or taxes) |
Management
Investment Adviser
Aspiriant, LLC serves as the Equity Allocation Fund’s investment adviser.
Sub-Advisers
Aperio Group, LLC (“Aperio”) and Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC (“GMO”) serve as the sub-advisers for the quality strategy of the Fund. Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”) serves as the sub-adviser for the global quality growth strategy of the Fund.
Portfolio Managers
John Allen, CFA, CAIA, Chief Investment Officer at the Adviser, and Marc Castellani, CFA, CAIA, CIMA, Managing Director of Private Investments at the Adviser, have co-managed the Fund since October 2015.
Ran Leshem, Head of SMA Solutions at Aperio, has co-managed the assets of the Fund allocated to Aperio since December 2014. Brian Ko, Lead Portfolio Manager at Aperio, has co-managed the assets of the Fund allocated to Aperio since November 2017. Michael Branch, Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of Investment Oversight and Research, and Willie Kwan, Lead Portfolio Manager at Aperio, have co-managed the assets of the Fund allocated to Aperio since April 2024.
Steven C. Angeli, CFA, Equity Portfolio Manager, Partner, and leader of the Quality Growth Team at Wellington, has managed the assets of the Fund allocated to Wellington since January 2024.
Tom Hancock, Head of Focused Equity Team and Partner at GMO, Anthony Hene, CFA, Member of Focused Equity Team and Partner at GMO, and Ty Cobb, CFA, Member of Focused Equity Team and Partner at GMO, have co-managed the assets of the Fund allocated to GMO since October 2022.
Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares
You may purchase or redeem shares of the Fund on any business day the NYSE is open. Advisor Shares are only available to the Adviser’s clients, charitable organizations that the Adviser’s clients wish to designate as recipients of shares, the Adviser’s employees (including their spouse, domestic partner, parents, siblings, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, parents-in-law and siblings-in-law), current and former owners of the Adviser, members of the Adviser’s board, and members of the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”). For Institutional Shares, you may purchase or sell shares by written request, telephone, or wire transfer. The minimum initial investment in Institutional Shares of the Fund is $100,000. There is no minimum initial investment for Advisor Shares.
6
Tax Information
The Fund intends to make distributions that may be taxed as ordinary income, qualified dividend income, or capital gains.
Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries
If you purchase the Fund through a broker-dealer or other financial intermediary (such as a bank), the Fund and its related companies may pay the intermediary for the sale of Fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the broker-dealer or other intermediary and your salesperson to recommend the Fund over another investment. Ask your salesperson or visit your financial intermediary’s website for more information.
7
FUND SUMMARY
The Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund (the “Fund” or “Municipal Bond Fund”) seeks total return on investment through income exempt from regular federal income taxes and through capital appreciation.
This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy, hold, and sell shares of the Fund. You may pay other fees, such as brokerage commissions and other fees to financial intermediaries, which are not reflected in the table and expense example below.
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases (as percentage of offering price) | |
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as percentage of net asset value) | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Reinvested Dividends | |
Redemption Fee (as percentage of amount redeemed) |
|
|
Management Fees | |
Distribution (12b-1) Fees | |
Other Expenses | |
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses (1) | |
Total Annual Operating Expenses | |
Fee Waivers (2) | ( |
Total Annual Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers |
(1) |
(2) |
8
This Example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. The Example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those periods. The Example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and the Fund’s operating expenses remain the same. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions your costs would be:
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
The
Municipal Bond Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over”
its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when shares
are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect
the Fund’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate was
The Fund may invest significantly in high yield municipal securities, which are securities rated below investment grade (BB/Ba or lower at the time of purchase) or, if unrated, judged to be of comparable quality by the Fund’s sub-advisers. High yield securities are commonly referred to as junk bonds and are considered speculative.
The Fund also invests in investment grade municipal and other securities, preferred securities, taxable municipals, and pooled investment vehicles (such as open-end and closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds, and private funds) that invest primarily in securities of the types in which the Fund may invest directly. In addition, for hedging purposes, the Fund may invest in structured notes and other derivatives such as futures contracts, options on futures contracts, swap agreements (including interest rate swaps, total return swaps and credit default swaps), and options on swap agreements.
The Fund may invest in all types of municipal securities, including general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, and participation interests in municipal leases. The Fund may invest in zero coupon bonds, which are issued at substantial discounts from their value at maturity and pay no cash income to their holders until they mature. The Fund may also invest in municipal forwards, which are contracts to purchase municipal securities for a specified price at a future date later than the normal settlement date.
The Fund may invest up to 15% of its net assets in municipal securities whose interest payments vary inversely with changes in short-term tax-exempt interest rates (“inverse floaters”). Inverse floaters are derivative securities that provide leveraged exposure to underlying municipal bonds. The Fund’s investments in inverse floaters are designed to increase the Fund’s income and returns through this leveraged exposure. These investments are speculative, however, and also create the possibility that income and returns will be diminished. Holders of inverse floaters are exposed to all of the gains or losses on the underlying municipal bonds, despite the fact that their net cash investment is significantly less than the value of those bonds. This multiplies the positive or negative impact of the underlying bonds’ price movements on the value of the inverse floaters, thereby creating effective leverage. The Fund may invest in inverse floaters that create effective leverage of up to 30% of the Fund’s total investment exposure. The Fund will only invest in inverse floating rate securities whose underlying bonds are rated A or higher.
The sub-advisers use a research-intensive investment process to identify higher-yielding and undervalued municipal bonds that offer above-average total return. The sub-advisers’ allocation within the municipal markets and among non-municipal markets is based on its macroeconomic outlook, relative valuation estimates among the various markets, and tax-adjusted total return estimates among alternative investment opportunities. The sub-advisers may choose to sell municipal bonds with deteriorating credit or limited upside potential compared to other available bonds.
9
The Adviser may change the Fund’s exposures from time-to-time, which in turn results in higher or lower levels of risk. In managing the Fund’s exposures, the Adviser considers a number of economic factors including valuation levels of publicly traded securities. For example, the Fund’s exposure to investment grade securities and high yield securities will vary depending on the market environment. In addition to varying its exposures, the Fund may also hold certain derivative positions intended to increase or decrease the risk of the Fund. For example, the Fund may enter into an interest rate swap designed to increase or decrease its sensitivity to prevailing interest rate levels.
Principal Risks
Because the value of your investment in the Municipal Bond Fund will fluctuate, you may lose money and there can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Fund.
Call Risk: If an issuer calls higher-yielding debt instruments held by the Fund, performance could be adversely impacted.
Counterparty Risk: Transactions involving a counterparty or third party (other than the issuer of the instrument) are subject to the counterparty’s or third party’s credit risk and ability to perform in accordance with the terms of the transaction.
Credit Risk: Credit risk is the risk that an issuer of a debt security may be unable or unwilling to make interest and principal payments when due and the related risk that the value of a debt security may decline because of concerns about the issuer’s ability or willingness to make such payments. Because the Fund may significantly invest in high yield securities, the Fund’s credit risks are greater than those of funds that buy only investment grade securities.
Defaulted Securities Risk: The risk of the uncertainty of repayment of defaulted securities (e.g., a security on which a principal or interest payment is not made when due) and obligations of distressed issuers.
Derivatives Risk: The use of derivatives by the Fund can lead to losses because of adverse movements in the price or value of the asset, index, rate, instrument or economic measure underlying a derivative, due to failure of a counterparty, or due to tax or regulatory constraints. In addition, the successful use of derivatives depends in part on the future price fluctuations and the degree of correlation between the underlying securities. Unusual market conditions or the lack of a ready market for any particular derivative at a specific time may reduce the effectiveness of the Fund’s derivate strategies and, for these and other reasons, the Fund’s derivative strategies may not reduce the Fund’s volatility to the extent desired. Derivatives for hedging purposes may not reduce risk if they are not sufficiently correlated to the position being hedged. Derivatives risk may be more significant when derivatives are used to enhance return or as a substitute for a position or security, rather than solely to hedge the risk of a position or security held by the Fund. Derivatives may create economic leverage in the Fund, which magnifies the Fund’s exposure to the underlying investment. As a result, the loss on derivative transactions may substantially exceed the initial investment. Derivative instruments may be difficult to value, may be illiquid, and may be subject to wide swings in valuation caused by changes in the value of the underlying instrument. Derivatives that are traded “over the counter” also present credit risk (the risk that the other party to the derivative contract will not fulfill its contractual obligations, whether because of bankruptcy or other default).
Extension Risk: The risk that if interest rates rise, repayments of principal on certain debt securities, including, but not limited to, floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, may occur at a slower rate than expected and the expected maturity of those securities could lengthen as a result. Securities that are subject to extension risk generally have a greater potential for loss when prevailing interest rates rise, which could cause their values to fall sharply.
High Yield Securities Risk: High yield securities, which are rated below investment grade and commonly referred to as “junk” bonds, are high risk investments that may cause income and principal losses for the Fund. They generally have greater credit risk, are less liquid, and have more volatile prices than investment grade securities. Defaulted bonds are speculative and involve substantial risks in addition to the risks of investing in high yield securities that have not defaulted. The Fund generally will not receive interest payments on the defaulted bonds and there is a substantial risk that principal will not be repaid. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a defaulted bond, the Fund may lose its entire investment.
Illiquid Investments Risk: The risk that the Fund may not be able to sell a security in a timely manner at a desired price. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid.
Income Risk: The Fund’s income could decline during periods of falling interest rates.
10
Interest Rate Risk: Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of the Fund’s portfolio will decline because of rising interest rates. The Fund may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates than would normally be the case due to the current period of historically low rates and the effect of potential government fiscal policy initiatives and resulting market reaction to those initiatives. When interest rates change, the values of longer-duration debt securities usually change more than the values of shorter-duration debt securities.
Inverse Floaters Risk: The use of inverse floaters by the Fund creates effective leverage. Due to the leveraged nature of these investments, they will typically be more volatile and involve greater risk than the fixed rate municipal bonds underlying the inverse floaters. An investment in certain inverse floaters will involve the risk that the Fund could lose more than its original principal investment. Distributions on inverse floaters bear an inverse relationship to short-term municipal bond interest rates. Thus, distributions paid to the Fund on its inverse floaters will be reduced or even eliminated as short-term municipal interest rates rise and will increase when short-term municipal interest rates fall. Inverse floaters generally will underperform the market for fixed rate municipal bonds in a rising interest rate environment.
Leverage Risk: Investments in futures, swaps, and other derivative instruments provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure, as well as the potential for greater loss. If the Fund uses leverage through activities such as purchasing derivative instruments in an effort to increase its returns, it has the risk of magnified capital losses that occur when losses affect an asset base, enlarged by the creation of liabilities, that exceeds the net assets of the Fund. The net asset value of the Fund when employing leverage will be more volatile and sensitive to market movements. Leverage may involve the creation of a liability that requires the Fund to pay interest.
Management and Operational Risk: The Fund runs the risk that investment techniques will fail to produce desired results. The Fund also runs the risk that the assessment of an investment (including a company’s fundamental fair (or intrinsic) value) may be wrong or that deficiencies in adviser’s or another service provider’s internal systems or controls will cause losses for the Fund or impair Fund’s operations.
Market Risk: Due to market conditions, the value of the Fund’s investments may fluctuate significantly from day to day. Price fluctuations may be temporary or may last for extended periods. Local, regional, or global events such as war, acts of terrorism, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, recessions, political and regulatory changes, or other events could have a significant impact on the market generally and on specific securities. The market value of a security may also decline because of factors that affect a particular industry or industries, such as labor shortages or increased production costs and competitive conditions within an industry.
Municipal Lease Obligations Risk: Participation interests in municipal leases pose special risks because many leases and contracts contain “non-appropriation” clauses that provide that the governmental issuer has no obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for this purpose by the appropriate legislative body.
Political and Economic Risks: The values of municipal securities held by the Fund may be adversely affected by local political and economic conditions and developments. Adverse conditions in an industry significant to a local economy could have a correspondingly adverse effect on the financial condition of local issuers. If the Fund invests significantly in municipal bonds from a particular state or U.S. territory, such as Puerto Rico, the Fund would be more susceptible to adverse economic, political or regulatory changes affecting municipal bond issuers in that location.
Preferred Securities Risk: Preferred securities may pay fixed or adjustable rates of return. Preferred securities are subject to issuer-specific and market risks applicable generally to equity securities. In addition, a company’s preferred securities generally pay dividends only after the company makes required payments to holders of its bonds and other debt. For this reason, the value of preferred securities will usually react more strongly than bonds and other debt to actual or perceived changes in the company’s financial condition or prospects. Preferred securities of smaller companies may be more vulnerable to adverse developments than preferred stock of larger companies.
Prepayment Risk: The risk that the issuer of a debt security, including floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, repays all or a portion of the principal prior to the security’s maturity. In times of declining interest rates, there is a greater likelihood that a fund’s higher yielding securities will be pre-paid with the fund being unable to reinvest the proceeds in an investment with as great a yield. Prepayments can therefore result in lower yields to shareholders of a fund.
Restricted Securities Risk: A fund may hold securities that are restricted as to resale under the U.S. federal securities laws. There can be no assurance that a trading market will exist at any time for any particular restricted security. Limitations on the resale of these securities may prevent a fund from disposing of them promptly at reasonable prices or at all. A fund may have to bear the expense of registering the securities for resale and the risk of substantial delays in effecting the registration. Also, restricted securities may be difficult to value because market quotations may not be readily available, and the values of restricted securities may have significant volatility.
11
Tax Risk: The Fund will rely on the opinion of issuers’ bond counsel on the tax-exempt status of interest on municipal bond obligations. Neither the Fund nor its sub-advisers will independently review the bases for those tax opinions, which may ultimately be determined to be incorrect and subject the Fund and its shareholders to substantial tax liabilities. Interest from municipal bonds held by the Fund could become subject to regular federal income tax because of, among other things, unfavorable changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by regulatory authorities, or noncompliant conduct by bond issuers. The Fund may not be a preferable investment for individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”) and other tax-deferred arrangements.
Underlying Fund Risk: The actual cost of investing in a mutual fund that invests in other investment companies and pooled investment vehicles may be higher than the cost of investing in a mutual fund that only invests directly in individual securities. The Fund will bear its pro rata portion of the expenses of the Underlying Funds in addition to its own direct expenses. By investing in Underlying Funds, the Fund is subject to the risks associated with the Underlying Funds’ investments. The Fund’s investment performance is directly tied to the performance of the Underlying Funds and other investments in which the Fund invests. If one or more of the Underlying Funds fails to meet its investment objective, or otherwise performs poorly, the Fund’s performance could be negatively affected. With respect to an Underlying Fund whose shares trade on an exchange (for example, an exchange-traded fund), its shares may trade below their net asset value or at a discount, which may adversely affect the Fund’s performance. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid. Illiquid investments are subject to the risk that the Fund will not be able to sell the investments when desired or at favorable prices.
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk: Zero coupon bonds do not pay interest on a current basis and may be highly volatile as interest rates rise or fall. In addition, while such bonds generate income for purposes of generally accepted accounting standards, they do not generate cash flow and thus could cause the Fund to be forced to liquidate securities at an inopportune time in order to distribute cash, as required by tax laws.
Principal Risks of Underlying Funds
Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Municipal Bond Fund as a result of its investments in the Underlying Funds. References in this section to a “fund” are to the Underlying Funds in which the Fund may invest and references to investments and securities are to those held directly by the Underlying Funds.
Short Sale Risk: The risk that the price of a security sold short will increase in value between the time of the short sale and the time a fund must purchase the security to return it to the lender. The fund’s potential loss on a short sale could theoretically be unlimited in a case where the fund is unable, for any reason, to close out its short position.
On July 1, 2015, simultaneous with the commencement of the Fund’s investment operations, the Advanced Capital Intelligence Global Income Opportunities Fund, L.P. (the “Private Fund”), a privately offered investment fund managed by the Adviser with investment policies, objectives, guidelines, and restrictions that were in all material respects equivalent to those of the Fund, converted into the Fund. The performance information shown below prior to July 1, 2015 is that of the Private Fund. The performance information for the Private Fund reflects the maximum fees and expenses that could have been charged to the Private Fund. The Private Fund was not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) and was not subject to certain investment limitations, diversification requirements, and other restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which, if applicable, may have adversely affected its performance.
12
* |
(
|
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years | |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund | |||
Total Return Before Taxes | |||
Return After Taxes on Distributions | |||
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | |||
Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index (reflects no deduction of fees, expenses or taxes) |
Management
Investment Adviser
Aspiriant, LLC serves as the Municipal Bond Fund’s investment adviser.
Sub-Advisers
Allspring Global Investments, LLC (“Allspring Investments”), MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields”), and Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Nuveen”) serve as the Municipal Bond Fund’s sub-advisers.
Portfolio Managers
John Allen, CFA, CAIA, Chief Investment Officer at the Adviser, and Marc Castellani, CFA, CAIA, CIMA, Managing Director of Private Investments at the Adviser, have co-managed the Fund since October 2015.
Robert Miller, Senior Portfolio Manager for Municipal Fixed Income team at Allspring Investments, has co-managed the assets of the Fund since May 2016. Terry J. Goode, Senior Portfolio Manager for Municipal Fixed Income team at Allspring Investments, has co-managed the assets of the Fund since June 2019. Nicholos Venditti, Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of Municipal Fixed Income team at Allspring Investments, has co-managed the assets of the Fund since August 2020.
13
Michael Denlinger, CFA, Managing Director and portfolio manager at MacKay Shields, and Robert DiMella, CFA, an Executive Managing Director at MacKay Shields and Co-Head of MacKay Municipal Managers, have co-managed the assets of the Fund since April 2022.
Daniel J. Close, CFA, Senior Managing Director, Portfolio Manager and Head of Municipals at Nuveen, has co-managed the assets of the Fund since June 2023. Paul L. Brennan, CFA, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at Nuveen, has co-managed the assets of the Fund since July 2015. Stephen Candido, CFA, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at Nuveen, has co-managed the assets of the Fund since January 2020.
Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares
You may purchase or redeem shares of the Fund on any business day. Shares of the Fund are only available to the Adviser’s clients, charitable organizations that the Adviser’s clients wish to designate as recipients of shares, the Adviser’s employees (including their spouse, domestic partner, parents, siblings, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, parents-in-law and siblings-in-law), current and former owners of the Adviser, members of the Adviser’s board, and members of the Board. There is no minimum initial or subsequent investment amount.
Tax Information
The Fund intends to make distributions that are primarily exempt from regular federal income tax. The Fund may not be a preferable investment for IRAs and other tax-deferred arrangements. All or a portion of the Fund’s distributions, however, may be subject to such tax, the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to non-corporate shareholders, and/or state and local taxes.
Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries
If you purchase the Fund through a broker-dealer or other financial intermediary (such as a bank), the Fund’s related companies may pay the intermediary for the sale of Fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the broker-dealer or other intermediary and your salesperson to recommend the Fund over another investment. Ask your salesperson or visit your financial intermediary’s website for more information.
14
FUND SUMMARY
The Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (the “Fund” or “Defensive Allocation Fund”) seeks to achieve long-term investment returns with lower risk and lower volatility than the stock market, and with relatively low correlation to stock and bond market indexes.
This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy, hold, and sell shares of the Fund. You may pay other fees, such as brokerage commissions and other fees to financial intermediaries, which are not reflected in the table and expense example below.
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases (as percentage of offering price) | |
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as percentage of net asset value) | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Reinvested Dividends | |
Redemption Fee (as percentage of amount redeemed) |
|
|
Management Fees | |
Distribution (12b-1) Fees | |
Other Expenses | |
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) | |
Total Annual Operating Expenses | |
Fee Waiver(2) | ( |
Total Annual Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver |
(1) |
15
(2) |
This Example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. The Example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those periods. The Example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and the Fund’s operating expenses remain the same. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions your costs would be:
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
The
Defensive Allocation Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over”
its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when shares
are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect
the Fund’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate was
The Defensive Allocation Fund is a “fund-of-funds” that seeks to provide an investment return that has lower volatility than traditional asset classes (i.e., public equity and investment grade bonds) by combining several non-traditional or alternative asset class exposures, including investments that focus on a specialized asset class such as long-short strategies. Non-traditional or alternative asset classes have tended over time to have a lower correlation with the broad U.S. stock and bond markets. The Fund allocates its assets among a variety of non-traditional or alternative asset classes listed below so as to capture diversifying returns from these non-traditional or alternative sources. The Defensive Allocation Fund invests primarily in Underlying Funds and may, to a limited extent, invest in separately managed accounts (“SMAs”), which are private portfolios of securities for individual accounts.
The Fund intends to allocate its assets among a range of investment strategies. At any point in time, the Fund’s exposures may include global equities, global fixed income, currencies, commodities (including gold), market neutral, global macro, managed futures, relative value, long/short equity, long/short debt, merger arbitrage, convertible arbitrage, security arbitrage, and other traditional and non-traditional strategies. In selecting Underlying Funds and asset class exposures, the Adviser will take asset diversification and potential volatility of return into account. The Underlying Funds include, among others, unaffiliated U.S. and foreign mutual funds and exchange traded funds, and unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds. At any time, investments in hedge funds will not exceed 15% of the Fund’s net assets. The Underlying Funds may invest in derivatives (e.g., futures, forwards, options, swaps or swaptions). A derivative is a contract whose value is based on performance of an underlying financial asset, index, rate, instrument or economic measure.
In seeking to achieve the Fund’s investment objective and preserve capital, the Adviser may invest a significant portion of the Fund’s net assets in cash and cash equivalents.
The Fund is non-diversified under the 1940 Act and may invest a greater percentage of its assets in fewer issuers than a diversified fund.
Principal Risks
Because the value of your investment in the Defensive Allocation Fund will fluctuate, you may lose money and there can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Fund as a result of its direct investments.
Asset Allocation Risk: The Fund is subject to different levels and combinations of risks based on its actual allocation among various asset classes and underlying investments. The Fund will be exposed to risks of the asset classes, underlying investments and financial markets in which it invests. The potential impact of the risks related to an asset class depends on the size of the Fund’s investment allocation to it at any point in time.
16
Illiquid Investments Risk: The risk that the Fund may not be able to sell a security in a timely manner at a desired price. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid.
Management and Operational Risk: The Fund runs the risk that investment techniques will fail to produce desired results. The Fund also runs the risk that the assessment of an investment (including a company’s fundamental fair (or intrinsic) value) may be wrong or that deficiencies in adviser’s or another service provider’s internal systems or controls will cause losses for the Fund or impair Fund’s operations.
Market Risk: The market value of a security may also decline because of factors that affect a particular industry or industries, such as labor shortages or increased production costs and competitive conditions within an industry. Local, regional, or global events such as war, acts of terrorism, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, recessions, political and regulatory changes, or other events could have a significant impact on the market generally and on specific securities. Due to market conditions, the value of the Fund’s investments may fluctuate significantly from day to day. Price fluctuations may be temporary or may last for extended periods.
Non-Diversification Risk: The Fund is non-diversified under the 1940 Act, which means that it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of fewer issuers as compared with diversified funds. To the extent the Fund invests in a relatively small number of issuers, a decline in the market value of a particular issuer held by the Fund may affect its value more than if it invested in a larger number of issuers and the value of the Fund’s shares may be more volatile than the values of shares of more diversified funds.
Political and Economic Risks: The values of securities may be adversely affected by local political and economic conditions and developments. Adverse conditions in an industry significant to a local economy could have a correspondingly adverse effect on the financial condition of local issuers.
Underlying Fund Risk: The actual cost of investing in a mutual fund that invests in other investment companies and pooled investment vehicles may be higher than the cost of investing in a mutual fund that only invests directly in individual securities. The Fund will bear its pro rata portion of the expenses of the Underlying Funds in addition to its own direct expenses. By investing in Underlying Funds, the Fund is subject to the risks associated with the Underlying Funds’ investments. The Fund’s investment performance is directly tied to the performance of the Underlying Funds and other investments in which the Fund invests. If one or more of the Underlying Funds fails to meet its investment objective, or otherwise performs poorly, the Fund’s performance could be negatively affected. With respect to an Underlying Fund whose shares trade on an exchange (for example, an exchange-traded fund), its shares may trade below their net asset value or at a discount, which may adversely affect the Fund’s performance. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid. Illiquid investments are subject to the risk that the Fund will not be able to sell the investments when desired or at favorable prices.
Principal Risks of Underlying Funds and SMAs
Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Defensive Allocation Fund as a result of its investments in the Underlying Funds and SMAs. References in this section to a “fund” are to the Underlying Funds and SMAs in which the Fund may invest and references to investments and securities are to those held directly by the Underlying Funds and SMAs.
Alternative Strategies Risk: The performance of a fund that pursues alternative strategies is linked to the performance of highly volatile traditional and alternative asset classes (e.g., equities, fixed income, currencies and commodities). To the extent the Fund invests in such fund, the Fund’s share price will be exposed to potentially significant fluctuations in value. In addition, a fund that employs alternative strategies has the risk that anticipated opportunities do not play out as planned, resulting in potentially substantial losses to the fund. Furthermore, alternative strategies may employ leverage, involve extensive short positions and/or focus on narrow segments of the market, which may magnify the overall risks and volatility associated with such fund’s investments. Depending on the particular alternative strategies used by a fund, it may be subject to risks not associated with more traditional investments.
Asset-Backed Securities Risk: The risk that the impairment of the value of the collateral underlying the security in which a fund invests, such as non-payment of loans, will result in a reduction in the value of the security.
Call Risk: If an issuer calls higher-yielding debt instruments held by a fund, performance could be adversely impacted.
Commodity Risk: The value of commodities may be more volatile than the value of equity securities or debt instruments and their value may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates, or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity. The price of a commodity may be affected by demand/supply imbalances in the market for the commodity.
17
Counterparty Risk: Transactions involving a counterparty or third party (other than the issuer of the instrument) are subject to the counterparty’s or third party’s credit risk and ability to perform in accordance with the terms of the transaction.
Covered Calls and Equity Collars: With respect to call options on individual equity securities, while a fund generally will write only covered call options, it may sell the instrument underlying a call option prior to entering into a closing purchase transaction on up to 10% of the fund’s net assets, provided that such sale will not occur more than three days prior to the option buy back. In an equity collar, a fund simultaneously writes a call option and purchases a put option on the same instrument. With respect to call options on equity indexes, the holdings of individual securities underlying the index is deemed by the investment adviser to be covering the call option sold. A fund may invest in uncovered call options when the security has been sold before the option expires.
Credit Risk: Credit risk is the risk that an issuer of a debt security may be unable or unwilling to make interest and principal payments when due and the related risk that the value of a debt security may decline because of concerns about the issuer’s ability or willingness to make such payments. Because a fund may significantly invest in high yield securities, the fund’s credit risks are greater than those of funds that buy only investment grade securities.
Defaulted Securities Risk: The risk of the uncertainty of repayment of defaulted securities (e.g., a security on which a principal or interest payment is not made when due) and obligations of distressed issuers.
Derivatives Risk: The use of derivatives by a fund can lead to losses because of adverse movements in the price or value of the asset, index, rate, instrument or economic measure underlying a derivative, due to failure of a counterparty, or due to tax or regulatory constraints. In addition, the successful use of derivatives depends in part on the future price fluctuations and the degree of correlation between the underlying securities. Unusual market conditions or the lack of a ready market for any particular derivative at a specific time may reduce the effectiveness of a fund’s derivate strategies and, for these and other reasons, a fund’s derivative strategies may not reduce the fund’s volatility to the extent desired. Derivatives for hedging purposes may not reduce risk if they are not sufficiently correlated to the position being hedged. Derivatives risk may be more significant when derivatives are used to enhance return or as a substitute for a position or security, rather than solely to hedge the risk of a position or security held by a fund. Derivatives may create economic leverage in a fund, which magnifies the fund’s exposure to the underlying investment. As a result, the loss on derivative transactions may substantially exceed the initial investment. Derivative instruments may be difficult to value, may be illiquid, and may be subject to wide swings in valuation caused by changes in the value of the underlying instrument. Derivatives that are traded “over the counter” also present credit risk (the risk that the other party to the derivative contract will not fulfill its contractual obligations, whether because of bankruptcy or other default).
Emerging Markets Risk: Emerging markets involve risks in addition to and greater than those generally associated with investing in more developed foreign markets. These less developed markets can be subject to greater social, economic, regulatory, and political uncertainties and can be extremely volatile.
Extension Risk: The risk that if interest rates rise, repayments of principal on certain debt securities, including, but not limited to, floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, may occur at a slower rate than expected and the expected maturity of those securities could lengthen as a result. Securities that are subject to extension risk generally have a greater potential for loss when prevailing interest rates rise, which could cause their values to fall sharply.
Floating Rate Loan Risk: Floating rate loans generally are subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans sometimes trade infrequently in the secondary market. As a result, valuing a floating rate loan can be more difficult, and buying and selling a floating rate loan at an acceptable price can be more difficult or delayed. Difficulty in selling a floating rate loan can result in a loss. In addition, a floating rate loan may not be fully collateralized, which may cause the floating rate loan to decline significantly in value. Floating rate loans issued by banks may be subject to extended trade settlement periods longer than seven days, which may delay a fund’s ability to pay redemption proceeds during a period of high volume shareholder redemptions. Such loans may not be considered securities and, therefore, may not be afforded the protections of the federal securities laws.
Foreign Securities and Currencies Risk: The prices of foreign securities, including depositary receipts and foreign funds, may decline or fluctuate because of (i) economic or political actions of foreign governments and/or (ii) less regulated or liquid securities markets. These risks are greater for emerging markets than for more developed foreign markets. Investors holding these securities are also exposed to foreign currency risk, which is the possibility that foreign currency will fluctuate in value against the U.S. dollar.
High Yield Securities Risk: High yield securities, which are rated below investment grade and commonly referred to as “junk” bonds, are high risk investments that may cause income and principal losses for a fund. They generally have greater credit risk, are less liquid, and have more volatile prices than investment grade securities. Defaulted bonds are speculative and involve substantial risks in addition to the risks of investing in high yield securities that have not defaulted. A fund generally will not receive interest payments on the defaulted bonds and there is a substantial risk that principal will not be repaid. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a defaulted bond, a fund may lose its entire investment.
18
Income Risk: A fund’s income could decline during periods of falling interest rates.
Interest Rate Risk: Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a fund’s portfolio will decline because of rising interest rates. A fund may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates than would normally be the case due to the current period of historically low rates and the effect of potential government fiscal policy initiatives and resulting market reaction to those initiatives. When interest rates change, the values of longer-duration debt securities usually change more than the values of shorter-duration debt securities.
Inverse Floaters Risk: The use of inverse floaters by a fund creates effective leverage. Due to the leveraged nature of these investments, they will typically be more volatile and involve greater risk than the fixed rate municipal bonds underlying the inverse floaters. An investment in certain inverse floaters will involve the risk that a fund could lose more than its original principal investment. Distributions on inverse floaters bear an inverse relationship to short-term municipal bond interest rates. Thus, distributions paid to the fund on its inverse floaters will be reduced or even eliminated as short-term municipal interest rates rise and will increase when short-term municipal interest rates fall. Inverse floaters generally will underperform the market for fixed rate municipal bonds in a rising interest rate environment.
Leverage Risk: Investments in futures, swaps, and other derivative instruments provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure, as well as the potential for greater loss. If a fund uses leverage through activities such as purchasing derivative instruments in an effort to increase its returns, it has the risk of magnified capital losses that occur when losses affect an asset base, enlarged by the creation of liabilities, that exceeds the net assets of the fund. The net asset value of a fund when employing leverage will be more volatile and sensitive to market movements. Leverage may involve the creation of a liability that requires a fund to pay interest.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk: The risk that borrowers may default on their mortgage obligations or the guarantees underlying the mortgage-backed securities will default or otherwise fail and that, during periods of falling interest rates, mortgage-backed securities will be called or prepaid, which may result in a fund having to reinvest proceeds in other investments at a lower interest rate. During periods of rising interest rates, the average life of a mortgage-backed security may extend, which may lock in a below-market interest rate, increase the security’s duration, and reduce the value of the security. Enforcing rights against the underlying assets or collateral may be difficult, or the underlying assets or collateral may be insufficient if the issuer defaults. The values of certain types of mortgage-backed securities, such as inverse floaters and interest-only and principal-only securities, may be extremely sensitive to changes in interest rates and prepayment rates.
Preferred Securities Risk: Preferred securities may pay fixed or adjustable rates of return. Preferred securities are subject to issuer-specific and market risks applicable generally to equity securities. In addition, a company’s preferred securities generally pay dividends only after the company makes required payments to holders of its bonds and other debt. For this reason, the value of preferred securities will usually react more strongly than bonds and other debt to actual or perceived changes in the company’s financial condition or prospects. Preferred securities of smaller companies may be more vulnerable to adverse developments than preferred stock of larger companies.
Prepayment Risk: The risk that the issuer of a debt security, including floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, repays all or a portion of the principal prior to the security’s maturity. In times of declining interest rates, there is a greater likelihood that a fund’s higher yielding securities will be pre-paid with the fund being unable to reinvest the proceeds in an investment with as great a yield. Prepayments can therefore result in lower yields to shareholders of a fund.
REIT and Real Estate Risk: Investment in REITs and real estate involves the risks that are associated with direct ownership of real estate and with the real estate industry in general. These risks include risks related to general, regional and local economic conditions; fluctuations in interest rates; property tax rates, zoning laws, environmental regulations and other governmental action; cash flow dependency; increased operating expenses; lack of availability of mortgage funds; losses due to natural disasters; changes in property values and rental rates; and other factors.
19
Restricted Securities Risk: A fund may hold securities that are restricted as to resale under the U.S. federal securities laws. There can be no assurance that a trading market will exist at any time for any particular restricted security. Limitations on the resale of these securities may prevent a fund from disposing of them promptly at reasonable prices or at all. A fund may have to bear the expense of registering the securities for resale and the risk of substantial delays in effecting the registration. Also, restricted securities may be difficult to value because market quotations may not be readily available, and the values of restricted securities may have significant volatility.
Sector Risk: At times, a fund may have a significant portion of its assets invested in securities of companies conducting business in a broadly related group of industries within an economic sector. Companies in the same economic sector may be similarly affected by economic or market events, making the fund more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in that economic sector than funds that invest more broadly.
Short Sale Risk: The risk that the price of a security sold short will increase in value between the time of the short sale and the time a fund must purchase the security to return it to the lender. The fund’s potential loss on a short sale could theoretically be unlimited in a case where the fund is unable, for any reason, to close out its short position.
Small and Mid-Cap Company Risk: Smaller capitalization companies may be more vulnerable than larger companies to adverse business or economic developments and they may have more limited resources. Securities of small and mid-cap companies are often less liquid than those of large companies and this could make it difficult to sell such securities at a desired time or price.
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk: Zero coupon bonds do not pay interest on a current basis and may be highly volatile as interest rates rise or fall. In addition, while such bonds generate income for purposes of generally accepted accounting standards, they do not generate cash flow and thus could cause a fund to be forced to liquidate securities at an inopportune time in order to distribute cash, as required by tax laws.
* |
( |
1 Year |
5 Year |
Since
Inception ( | |
Advisor Shares | |||
Total Return Before Taxes | |||
Return After Taxes on Distribution | |||
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | |||
HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index (reflects no deduction of fees, expenses or taxes) | |||
Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index (reflects no deduction of fees, expenses or taxes) | ( |
20
Management
Investment Adviser
Aspiriant, LLC serves as the Defensive Allocation Fund’s investment adviser.
Portfolio Managers
John Allen, CFA, CAIA, Chief Investment Officer at the Adviser, and Marc Castellani, CFA, CAIA, CIMA, Managing Director of Private Investments at the Adviser, have co-managed the Fund since December 2015.
Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares
You may purchase or redeem shares of the Fund on any business day. Shares of the Fund are only available to the Adviser’s clients, charitable organizations that the Adviser’s clients wish to designate as recipients of shares, the Adviser’s employees (including their spouse, domestic partner, parents, siblings, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, parents-in-law and siblings-in-law), current and former owners of the Adviser, members of the Adviser’s board, and members of the Board. There is no minimum initial or subsequent investment amount.
Tax Information
The Fund intends to make distributions that may be taxed as ordinary income, qualified dividend income, or capital gains.
Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries
If you purchase the Fund through a broker-dealer or other financial intermediary (such as a bank), the Fund’s related companies may pay the intermediary for the sale of Fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the broker-dealer or other intermediary and your salesperson to recommend the Fund over another investment. Ask your salesperson or visit your financial intermediary’s website for more information.
21
FUND SUMMARY
The Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (the “Fund” or “Taxable Bond Fund”) seeks to maximize long-term total return.
This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy, hold, and sell shares of the Fund. You may pay other fees, such as brokerage commissions and other fees to financial intermediaries, which are not reflected in the table and expense example below.
Maximum
Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases (as percentage of offering price) |
|
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as percentage of net asset value) | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Reinvested Dividends | |
Redemption Fee (as percentage of amount redeemed) |
Annual
Fund Operating Expenses |
Management Fees | |
Distribution (12b-1) Fees | |
Other Expenses | |
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) | |
Total Annual Operating Expenses | |
Fee Waivers(2) | ( |
Total Annual Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers |
(1) |
(2) |
22
This Example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. The Example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those periods. The Example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and the Fund’s operating expenses remain the same. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions your costs would be:
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
The
Taxable Bond Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over”
its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs and may result in higher taxes when shares
are held in a taxable account. These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the example, affect
the Fund’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate was
The
Taxable Bond Fund is a “fund-of-funds” that seeks to maximize long-term total return. The Fund invests primarily in
Underlying Funds and may, to a limited extent, invest in SMAs, which are private portfolios of securities for individual accounts.
The Taxable Bond Fund intends to allocate its assets to Underlying Funds and SMAs that primarily invest in various types of bonds and other securities, typically government and agency bonds, corporate bonds, notes, mortgage-related and asset-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, zero coupon bonds, bank loans, money market instruments, repurchase agreements, swaps, futures, options, credit default swaps, private placements and restricted securities. These investments may have interest rates that are fixed, variable or floating. The Underlying Funds and SMAs may invest in the U.S. and abroad, including international and emerging markets, and may purchase securities of any credit rating and varying maturities issued by domestic and foreign corporations, entities and governments.
In selecting Underlying Funds and SMAs, the Adviser will take asset diversification and potential volatility of return into account. The portfolio management team expects to actively evaluate each Underlying Fund and SMA based on its potential return, its risk level, and how it fits within the Fund’s overall portfolio in determining whether to buy or sell investments. The Adviser will also actively manage the Fund’s risks on an on-going basis to mitigate the risk of excessive losses by the portfolio overall.
The Underlying Funds consist of unaffiliated U.S. and foreign mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds. Because investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid, the Fund will not make any such investment if such investment would result in the Fund holding more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid investments.
Principal Risks
Because the value of your investment in the Taxable Bond Fund will fluctuate, you may lose money and there can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Fund.
Asset Allocation Risk: The Fund is subject to different levels and combinations of risks based on its actual allocation among the various Underlying Funds and SMAs. The Fund will be exposed to risks of the asset classes, underlying investments and financial markets in which it invests. The potential impact of the risks related to an asset class depends on the size of the Fund’s investment allocation to it at any point in time.
Illiquid Investments Risk: The risk that the Fund may not be able to sell a security in a timely manner at a desired price. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid.
Management and Operational Risk: The Fund runs the risk that investment techniques will fail to produce desired results. The Fund also runs the risk that the assessment of an investment (including a company’s fundamental fair (or intrinsic) value) may be wrong or that deficiencies in adviser’s or another service provider’s internal systems or controls will cause losses for the Fund or impair Fund’s operations.
23
Market Risk: Due to market conditions, the value of the Fund’s investments may fluctuate significantly from day to day. Price fluctuations may be temporary or may last for extended periods. Local, regional, or global events such as war, acts of terrorism, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, recessions, political and regulatory changes, or other events could have a significant impact on the market generally and on specific securities. Due to market conditions, the value of the Fund’s investments may fluctuate significantly from day to day. Price fluctuations may be temporary or may last for extended periods.
Political and Economic Risks: The values of securities may be adversely affected by local political and economic conditions and developments. Adverse conditions in an industry significant to a local economy could have a correspondingly adverse effect on the financial condition of local issuers.
Underlying Fund Risk: The actual cost of investing in a mutual fund that invests in other investment companies and pooled investment vehicles may be higher than the cost of investing in a mutual fund that only invests directly in individual securities. The Fund will bear its pro rata portion of the expenses of the Underlying Funds in addition to its own direct expenses. By investing in Underlying Funds, the Fund is subject to the risks associated with the Underlying Funds’ investments. The Fund’s investment performance is directly tied to the performance of the Underlying Funds and other investments in which the Fund invests. If one or more of the Underlying Funds fails to meet its investment objective, or otherwise performs poorly, the Fund’s performance could be negatively affected. With respect to an Underlying Fund whose shares trade on an exchange (for example, an exchange-traded fund), its shares may trade below their net asset value or at a discount, which may adversely affect the Fund’s performance. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid. Illiquid investments are subject to the risk that the Fund will not be able to sell the investments when desired or at favorable prices.
Principal Risks of Underlying Funds and SMAs
Below is a summary of the principal risks of investing in the Taxable Bond Fund as a result of its investments in the Underlying Funds and SMAs. References in this section to a “fund” are to the Underlying Funds and SMAs in which the Fund may invest and references to investments and securities are to those held directly by the Underlying Funds and SMAs.
Asset-Backed Securities Risk: The risk that the impairment of the value of the collateral underlying the security in which a fund invests, such as non-payment of loans, will result in a reduction in the value of the security.
Call Risk: If an issuer calls higher-yielding debt instruments held by a fund, performance could be adversely impacted.
Counterparty Risk: Transactions involving a counterparty or third party (other than the issuer of the instrument) are subject to the counterparty’s or third party’s credit risk and ability to perform in accordance with the terms of the transaction.
Credit Risk: Credit risk is the risk that an issuer of a debt security may be unable or unwilling to make interest and principal payments when due and the related risk that the value of a debt security may decline because of concerns about the issuer’s ability or willingness to make such payments. Because a fund may significantly invest in high yield securities, the fund’s credit risks are greater than those of funds that buy only investment grade securities.
Defaulted Securities Risk: The risk of the uncertainty of repayment of defaulted securities (e.g., a security on which a principal or interest payment is not made when due) and obligations of distressed issuers.
Derivatives Risk: The use of derivatives by a fund can lead to losses because of adverse movements in the price or value of the asset, index, rate, instrument or economic measure underlying a derivative, due to failure of a counterparty, or due to tax or regulatory constraints. In addition, the successful use of derivatives depends in part on the future price fluctuations and the degree of correlation between the underlying securities. Unusual market conditions or the lack of a ready market for any particular derivative at a specific time may reduce the effectiveness of a fund’s derivate strategies and, for these and other reasons, a fund’s derivative strategies may not reduce the fund’s volatility to the extent desired. Derivatives for hedging purposes may not reduce risk if they are not sufficiently correlated to the position being hedged. Derivatives risk may be more significant when derivatives are used to enhance return or as a substitute for a position or security, rather than solely to hedge the risk of a position or security held by a fund. Derivatives may create economic leverage in a fund, which magnifies the fund’s exposure to the underlying investment. As a result, the loss on derivative transactions may substantially exceed the initial investment. Derivative instruments may be difficult to value, may be illiquid, and may be subject to wide swings in valuation caused by changes in the value of the underlying instrument. Derivatives that are traded “over the counter” also present credit risk (the risk that the other party to the derivative contract will not fulfill its contractual obligations, whether because of bankruptcy or other default).
24
Emerging Markets Risk: Emerging markets involve risks in addition to and greater than those generally associated with investing in more developed foreign markets. These less developed markets can be subject to greater social, economic, regulatory, and political uncertainties and can be extremely volatile.
Extension Risk: The risk that if interest rates rise, repayments of principal on certain debt securities, including, but not limited to, floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, may occur at a slower rate than expected and the expected maturity of those securities could lengthen as a result. Securities that are subject to extension risk generally have a greater potential for loss when prevailing interest rates rise, which could cause their values to fall sharply.
Floating Rate Loan Risk: Floating rate loans generally are subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans sometimes trade infrequently in the secondary market. As a result, valuing a floating rate loan can be more difficult, and buying and selling a floating rate loan at an acceptable price can be more difficult or delayed. Difficulty in selling a floating rate loan can result in a loss. In addition, a floating rate loan may not be fully collateralized, which may cause the floating rate loan to decline significantly in value. Floating rate loans issued by banks may be subject to extended trade settlement periods longer than seven days, which may delay a fund’s ability to pay redemption proceeds during a period of high volume shareholder redemptions. Such loans may not be considered securities and, therefore, may not be afforded the protections of the federal securities laws.
Foreign Securities and Currencies Risk: The prices of foreign securities, including depositary receipts and foreign funds, may decline or fluctuate because of (i) economic or political actions of foreign governments and/or (ii) less regulated or liquid securities markets. These risks are greater for emerging markets than for more developed foreign markets. Investors holding these securities are also exposed to foreign currency risk, which is the possibility that foreign currency will fluctuate in value against the U.S. dollar.
High Yield Securities Risk: High yield securities, which are rated below investment grade and commonly referred to as “junk” bonds, are high risk investments that may cause income and principal losses for a fund. They generally have greater credit risk, are less liquid, and have more volatile prices than investment grade securities. Defaulted bonds are speculative and involve substantial risks in addition to the risks of investing in high yield securities that have not defaulted. A fund generally will not receive interest payments on the defaulted bonds and there is a substantial risk that principal will not be repaid. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a defaulted bond, a fund may lose its entire investment.
Income Risk: A fund’s income could decline during periods of falling interest rates.
Inflation-Indexed Bond Risk: The risk that such bonds will change in value in response to actual or anticipated changes in inflation rates in a manner unanticipated by a fund’s portfolio management team or investors generally. Inflation-indexed bonds are subject to debt securities risks.
Interest Rate Risk: Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a fund’s portfolio will decline because of rising interest rates. A fund may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates than would normally be the case due to the current period of historically low rates and the effect of potential government fiscal policy initiatives and resulting market reaction to those initiatives. When interest rates change, the values of longer-duration debt securities usually change more than the values of shorter-duration debt securities.
Leverage Risk: Investments in futures, swaps, and other derivative instruments provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure, as well as the potential for greater loss. If a fund uses leverage through activities such as purchasing derivative instruments in an effort to increase its returns, it has the risk of magnified capital losses that occur when losses affect an asset base, enlarged by the creation of liabilities, that exceeds the net assets of the fund. The net asset value of a fund when employing leverage will be more volatile and sensitive to market movements. Leverage may involve the creation of a liability that requires a fund to pay interest.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk: The risk that borrowers may default on their mortgage obligations or the guarantees underlying the mortgage-backed securities will default or otherwise fail and that, during periods of falling interest rates, mortgage-backed securities will be called or prepaid, which may result in a fund having to reinvest proceeds in other investments at a lower interest rate. During periods of rising interest rates, the average life of a mortgage-backed security may extend, which may lock in a below-market interest rate, increase the security’s duration, and reduce the value of the security. Enforcing rights against the underlying assets or collateral may be difficult, or the underlying assets or collateral may be insufficient if the issuer defaults. The values of certain types of mortgage-backed securities, such as inverse floaters and interest-only and principal-only securities, may be extremely sensitive to changes in interest rates and prepayment rates.
25
Preferred Securities Risk: Preferred securities may pay fixed or adjustable rates of return. Preferred securities are subject to issuer-specific and market risks applicable generally to equity securities. In addition, a company’s preferred securities generally pay dividends only after the company makes required payments to holders of its bonds and other debt. For this reason, the value of preferred securities will usually react more strongly than bonds and other debt to actual or perceived changes in the company’s financial condition or prospects. Preferred securities of smaller companies may be more vulnerable to adverse developments than preferred stock of larger companies.
Prepayment Risk: The risk that the issuer of a debt security, including floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, repays all or a portion of the principal prior to the security’s maturity. In times of declining interest rates, there is a greater likelihood that a fund’s higher yielding securities will be pre-paid with the fund being unable to reinvest the proceeds in an investment with as great a yield. Prepayments can therefore result in lower yields to shareholders of a fund.
Restricted Securities Risk: A fund may hold securities that are restricted as to resale under the U.S. federal securities laws. There can be no assurance that a trading market will exist at any time for any particular restricted security. Limitations on the resale of these securities may prevent a fund from disposing of them promptly at reasonable prices or at all. A fund may have to bear the expense of registering the securities for resale and the risk of substantial delays in effecting the registration. Also, restricted securities may be difficult to value because market quotations may not be readily available, and the values of restricted securities may have significant volatility.
Sector Risk: At times, a fund may have a significant portion of its assets invested in securities of companies conducting business in a broadly related group of industries within an economic sector. Companies in the same economic sector may be similarly affected by economic or market events, making the fund more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in that economic sector than funds that invest more broadly.
Short Sale Risk: The risk that the price of a security sold short will increase in value between the time of the short sale and the time a fund must purchase the security to return it to the lender. The fund’s potential loss on a short sale could theoretically be unlimited in a case where the fund is unable, for any reason, to close out its short position.
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk: Zero coupon bonds do not pay interest on a current basis and may be highly volatile as interest rates rise or fall. In addition, while such bonds generate income for purposes of generally accepted accounting standards, they do not generate cash flow and thus could cause a fund to be forced to liquidate securities at an inopportune time in order to distribute cash, as required by tax laws.
* |
( |
26
1 Year |
5 Year |
Since
Inception ( | |
Advisor Shares | |||
Total Return Before Taxes | |||
Return After Taxes on Distribution | ( |
||
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | ( |
||
Bloomberg
Aggregate Bond Index (reflects no deduction of fees, expenses or taxes) |
( |
Management
Investment Adviser
Aspiriant, LLC serves as the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”).
Portfolio Managers
John Allen, CFA, CAIA, Chief Investment Officer at the Adviser, and Marc Castellani, CFA, CAIA, CIMA, Managing Director of Private Investments at the Adviser, have co-managed the Fund since its inception in 2018.
Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares
You may purchase or redeem shares of the Fund on any business day the NYSE is open. Shares of the Fund are only available to the Adviser’s clients, charitable organizations that the Adviser’s clients wish to designate as recipients of shares, the Adviser’s employees (including their spouse, domestic partner, parents, siblings, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, parents-in-law and siblings-in-law), current and former owners of the Adviser, members of the Adviser’s board, and members of the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”). There is no minimum initial or subsequent investment amount.
Tax Information
The Fund intends to make distributions that may be taxed as ordinary income or capital gains.
Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries
If you purchase the Fund through a broker-dealer or other financial intermediary (such as a bank), the Fund’s related companies may pay the intermediary for the sale of Fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the broker-dealer or other intermediary and your salesperson to recommend the Fund over another investment. Ask your salesperson or visit your financial intermediary’s website for more information.
27
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RELATED RISKS OF THE FUNDS
General
To help you better understand the Funds, this section provides a detailed discussion of each Fund’s principal investment strategies and the related risks. A description of the Fund’s policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of each Fund’s portfolio securities is available in the Fund’s SAI.
Investment Objective
The investment objective of the Equity Allocation Fund is to achieve long-term capital appreciation while considering federal tax implications of investment decisions. The Municipal Bond Fund seeks total return on investment through income exempt from regular federal income taxes and through capital appreciation. The Defensive Allocation Fund seeks to achieve long-term investment returns with lower risk and lower volatility than the stock market, and with relatively low correlation to stock and bond market indexes. The Taxable Bond Fund seeks to maximize long-term total return. Each Fund’s investment objective may be changed without shareholder approval.
Principal Investment Strategies
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund
The Adviser intends to implement the Equity Allocation Fund’s strategies by hiring one or more sub-advisers to focus on specific aspects of the Fund’s strategies. Aperio is responsible for the Fund’s quality strategy. Wellington is responsible for the Fund’s global quality growth strategy.
Under normal conditions, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities. The types of equity securities the Fund may invest in include common stock, preferred stock, and depositary receipts. The Fund may also invest in securities that provide exposure to equity securities (i.e., rights, warrants, and investment company shares). The Fund will hold a broad and diverse group of equity securities of companies in countries with developed and emerging markets, which are considered developed or emerging based upon the market definition used by the MSCI Index. The Fund may invest in companies of any market capitalization.
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in securities that the Adviser believes offer the most attractive return vs. risk opportunities. The Fund’s assets are allocated to various sub-advisers and invested directly in Underlying Funds based on asset class forecasts used by the Adviser, together with its assessment of the risks of such asset classes. A key component of those forecasts is the Adviser’s expectation that valuations ultimately revert to their fundamental fair value. The Adviser changes the Fund’s allocations in response to changes in the Adviser’s investment outlook and in financial market valuations. In an environment of high valuations, the Adviser may adjust the Fund’s allocations to reduce valuation risk by allocating to or overweighting low volatility, quality, and long/short equity strategies. Conversely, in an environment where the Adviser believes valuations are low, the allocations may be adjusted to perform similar to the Benchmarks (as defined below) by allocating to or overweighting strategies that will be less defensive than the Benchmarks. The Adviser and sub-advisers generally will consider selling securities when other securities are identified that may result in a better opportunity.
For a portion of its assets, which may be significant, the Fund may seek to reduce the volatility of its net asset value relative to the MSCI Index (a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets) with respect to global securities, or to the S&P 500 Index (the “S&P 500” and together with the MSCI Index, the “Benchmarks”), with respect to domestic securities, by using a global or domestic low volatility strategy that focuses on lower volatility equities through the use of risk models. The use of risk models refers to the use of a consistent process based on Models and Data (described below) to invest in securities that exhibit below average forecasted risk characteristics in order to achieve market-like returns with less volatility than the relevant Benchmark over a full market cycle. The Adviser considers a full market cycle to be the period between two peaks, which includes both a bear and a bull market and generally spans 7 to 10 years.
The Fund also pursues low volatility strategies by investing in Underlying Funds that seek to reduce volatility and achieve market-like returns by investing in equity securities believed to exhibit lower volatility than the relevant Benchmark over a full market cycle.
In addition, the Fund may use a significant portion of its assets to seek to reduce volatility relative to the MSCI Index, with respect to global securities, or to the S&P 500, with respect to domestic securities, by using a global or domestic quality strategy that focuses on lower risk and high quality equities. The Fund considers high quality equities to be equities of fundamentally strong companies with established track records of historical profitability that are able to outgrow an average company over time. The global quality strategy seeks to provide diversified exposure to high quality global companies, while the domestic quality strategy seeks to provide diversified exposure to high quality U.S. companies. The quality strategy may focus on security selection that could be considered growth investing or value investing. The quality strategy may tilt a portion of the Fund’s portfolio toward stocks that have lower volatility, lower earnings variation, lower leverage, and higher earnings yield versus the MSCI Index for the global quality strategy and the S&P 500 for the domestic quality strategy.
28
The Fund also pursues a quality strategy by investing in Underlying Funds that seek to reduce volatility by investing in equity securities believed to be of high quality.
In addition, the Fund pursues a long/short equity strategy by investing in Underlying Funds that seek to reduce volatility and achieve capital appreciation over a full market cycle by investing long and short in domestic and global equity securities.
When investing in Underlying Funds, the Fund will bear its pro rata portion of the expenses of the Underlying Funds in addition to its own direct expenses.
Given the complexity of the investments and strategies of the Fund, certain of the sub-advisers rely heavily on quantitative models (both proprietary models developed by the sub-adviser, and those supplied by third parties) and information and data supplied by third parties (“Models and Data”). Models and Data are used to construct sets of transactions and investments by helping to determine the expected returns of securities.
In constructing the Fund’s investment portfolio, certain sub-advisers consider federal tax implications when making investment decisions with respect to individual securities to seek to provide a tax advantage. When consistent with the Fund’s investment policies, the Adviser and sub-advisers will buy and sell securities for the portfolio considering the goals of: (i) delaying and minimizing the realization of net capital gains (e.g., selling stocks with capital losses to offset gains, realized or anticipated); and (ii) maximizing the extent to which any realized net capital gains are long-term in nature (i.e., taxable to individuals at lower capital gains tax rates). This tax-managed approach may only apply to a portion of the Fund’s portfolio.
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund
To achieve its investment objective, under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in municipal securities that pay income that is exempt from regular federal income tax. These municipal securities include obligations issued by U.S. states and their subdivisions, authorities, instrumentalities, and corporations, as well as obligations issued by U.S. territories (such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam). The Fund may invest without limit in securities that generate income subject to the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to non-corporate shareholders.
The Fund may invest significantly in high yield municipal securities, which are securities rated below investment grade (BB/Ba or lower at the time of purchase) or, if unrated, judged to be of comparable quality by the sub-advisers. Below investment grade securities are commonly referred to as junk bonds and are considered speculative.
The Fund also may invest in investment grade municipal and other securities, preferred securities, taxable municipals, and pooled investment vehicles that invest primarily in securities of the types in which the Fund may invest directly. In addition, for hedging purposes, the Fund may invest in structured notes and other derivatives such as futures contracts, options on futures contracts, swap agreements (including interest rate swaps, total return swaps and credit default swaps), and options on swap agreements. A structured note is a debt obligation that contains an embedded derivative component with characteristics that adjust the security’s risk/return profile. The return performance of a structured note will track that of the underlying debt obligation and the derivative embedded within it. The Fund may use these derivatives in an attempt to manage market risk, credit risk, and yield curve risk and to manage the effective maturity or duration of securities in the Fund’s portfolio.
Municipal Securities. The Fund may invest in all types of municipal securities, including general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, and participation interests in municipal leases. The Fund may invest in zero coupon bonds, which are issued at substantial discounts from their value at maturity and pay no cash income to their holders until they mature. The municipal securities in which the Fund invests may have variable, floating, or fixed interest rates.
States, local governments, municipalities, and other issuing authorities issue municipal securities to raise money for various public purposes such as building public facilities, refinancing outstanding obligations, and financing general operating expenses. These securities include general obligation bonds, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the issuer and may be repaid from any revenue source, and revenue bonds, which may be repaid only from the revenue of a specific facility or source. Certain municipal bonds represent lease obligations, which carry special risks because the issuer of the bonds may not be obligated to appropriate money annually to make payments under the lease. To reduce this risk, the Fund will, in making purchase decisions, take into consideration the issuer’s incentive to continue making appropriations until maturity.
29
In evaluating municipal bonds of different credit qualities or maturities, the sub-advisers take into account the size of yield spreads. Yield spread is the additional return the Fund may earn by taking on additional credit risk or interest rate risk. For example, yields on low quality bonds are higher than yields on high quality bonds because investors must be compensated for incurring the higher credit risk associated with low quality bonds. If yield spreads do not provide adequate compensation for the additional risk associated with low quality bonds, the Fund may buy bonds of relatively higher quality. Similarly, in evaluating bonds of different maturities, the sub-advisers evaluate the comparative yield available on these bonds. If yield spreads on long-term bonds do not compensate the Fund adequately for the additional interest rate risk the Fund must assume, the Fund may buy bonds of relatively shorter maturity. In addition, municipal bonds in a particular industry may provide higher yields relative to their risk compared to bonds in other industries. If that occurs, the Fund may buy more bonds from issuers in that industry.
The sub-advisers use a research-intensive investment process to identify higher-yielding and undervalued municipal securities that offer above-average total return. The sub-advisers’ allocation within the municipal markets and among non-municipal markets is based on its macroeconomic outlook, relative valuation estimates among the various markets, and tax-adjusted total return estimates among alternative investment opportunities. The sub-advisers may choose to sell municipal securities with deteriorating credit or limited upside potential compared to other available securities.
The Fund may enter into contracts to purchase securities for a specified price at a future date later than the normal settlement date. Municipal forwards pay higher interest rates after settlement than standard bonds to compensate the buyer for bearing market risk, but deferring income during the settlement period, and can often be bought at attractive prices and yields. For instance, if the Fund knows that a bond will, or is likely to, be called or mature on a specific future date, the Fund may buy a forward settling on or about that date to replace the called or maturing bond and “lock in” a currently attractive interest rate.
Inverse Floaters. The Fund may invest up to 15% of its net assets in inverse floaters issued in tender option bond (“TOB”) transactions. In a TOB transaction, one or more highly-rated municipal bonds are deposited into a special purpose trust that issues floating rate securities (“floaters”) to outside parties and inverse floaters to long-term investors like the Fund. The floaters pay interest at a rate that is reset periodically (generally weekly) to reflect current short-term tax-exempt interest rates. Holders of the floaters have the right to tender such securities back to the TOB trust for par plus accrued interest (the “put option”), typically on seven days’ notice. Holders of the floaters are paid from the proceeds of a successful remarketing of the floaters or by a liquidity provider in the event of a failed remarketing. The inverse floaters pay interest at a rate equal to (a) the interest accrued on the underlying bonds, minus (b) the sum of the interest payable on the floaters and fees payable in connection with the TOB. Thus, the interest payments on the inverse floaters will vary inversely with the short-term rates paid on the floaters. Holders of the inverse floaters typically have the right to simultaneously (a) cause the holders of the floaters to tender those floaters to the TOB trust at par plus accrued interest and (b) purchase the municipal bonds from the TOB trust. Interest payments received on floaters are subject to federal income tax.
Because holders of the floaters have the right to tender their securities to the TOB trust at par plus accrued interest, holders of the inverse floaters are exposed to all of the gains or losses on the underlying municipal bonds, despite the fact that their net cash investment is significantly less than the value of those bonds. This multiplies the positive or negative impact of the underlying bonds’ price movements on the value of the inverse floaters, thereby creating effective leverage. The effective leverage created by any TOB transaction depends on the value of the securities deposited in the TOB trust relative to the value of the floaters it issues. The higher the percentage of the TOB trust’s total value represented by the floaters, the greater the effective leverage. For example, if municipal bonds worth $100 are deposited in a TOB trust and the TOB trust issues floaters worth $75 and inverse floaters worth $25, the TOB trust will have a leverage ratio of 3:1 and the inverse floaters will exhibit price movements at a rate that is four times that of the underlying bonds deposited into the trust. If that same TOB trust were to issue only $50 of floaters, the leverage ratio would be 1:1 and the inverse floaters would exhibit price movements at a rate that is only two times that of the underlying bonds.
The Fund may invest in inverse floaters that create effective leverage of up to 30% of the Fund’s total investment exposure. For purposes of this calculation, the Fund’s total investment exposure includes not only the inverse floaters owned by the Fund but also the assets attributable to the floaters issued by the related TOB trust. As an illustration, assume that a hypothetical fund with $80 of assets invests in the inverse floaters issued by a TOB trust with $30 of underlying municipal bonds and a 2:1 leverage ratio (i.e., the trust has issued $20 of floaters and $10 of inverse floaters). The fund’s effective leverage amount (the $20 of floaters outstanding) would be equal to 20% of its total $100 investment exposure ($80 of original assets plus the $20 in floaters to which the fund is now exposed).
Short-Term Investments. Under normal market conditions, the Fund may invest up to 20% of its net assets in short-term investments, such as short-term, high quality municipal bonds, or tax-exempt money market funds. The Fund may invest in short term, high quality taxable securities or shares of taxable money market funds if suitable short-term municipal bonds or shares of tax-exempt money market funds are not available at reasonable prices and yields.
30
Risk Management. The Adviser may change the Fund’s exposures from time-to-time, which in turn results in higher or lower levels of risk. In managing the Fund’s exposures, the Adviser considers a number of economic factors including valuation levels of publicly traded securities. For example, the Fund’s exposure to investment grade securities and high yield securities will vary depending on the market environment. In addition to varying its exposures, the Fund may also hold certain derivative positions intended to increase or decrease the risk of the Fund. For example, the Fund may enter into an interest rate swap designed to increase or decrease its sensitivity to prevailing interest rate levels.
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
The Defensive Allocation Fund is a “fund-of-funds” that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in Underlying Funds and may, to a limited extent, invest in SMAs, which are private portfolios of securities for individual accounts. The Fund seeks to provide a return that has lower volatility than traditional asset classes (i.e., public equity and investment grade bonds) by combining traditional asset classes with several non-traditional or alternative asset class exposures, including investments that focus on a specialized asset class (e.g., long-short strategies). Non-traditional or alternative asset classes have tended over time to have a lower correlation with the broad U.S. stock and bond markets.
The Fund allocates its assets among a variety of non-traditional or alternative asset classes so as to capture diversifying returns from these non-traditional or alternative sources. The Fund’s non-traditional and alternative asset class exposures include the strategies listed below, and other non-traditional strategies. In selecting Underlying Funds and asset class exposures, the Adviser will take asset diversification and potential volatility of return into account. The Underlying Funds include, among others, unaffiliated U.S. and foreign mutual funds and exchange traded funds, and unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds. At any time, investments in hedge funds will not exceed 15% of the Fund’s net assets. The Underlying Funds may invest in derivatives (e.g., futures, forwards, options, swaps or swaptions). A derivative is a contract whose value is based on performance of an underlying financial asset, index, rate, instrument or economic measure.
Conservative Allocation strategies seek to preserve an investment portfolio’s value by allocating a higher percentage of the portfolio in lower risk securities such as fixed income, money market securities, and cash.
Market Neutral strategies are designed to exploit equity market inefficiencies, which involve being simultaneously invested in long and short matched equity portfolios generally of the same size, usually in the same market and attempts to achieve capital appreciation.
Global Macro strategies involve taking long and/or short positions on the basis of macroeconomic and political forecasts. Managers typically express their views by investing in the futures and forwards markets, but can also hold positions in the cash equities and fixed income markets.
Relative Value strategies combine a variety of different strategies used with a broad array of securities. The strategy involves purchasing a security that is expected to appreciate, while simultaneously selling short a related security that is expected to depreciate. Related securities can be the stock and bond of a specific company; the stocks of two different companies in the same sector; or two bonds issued by the same company with different maturity dates and/or coupons.
Long/Short Equity strategies employ long and short trading in common stock and preferred stock of U.S. and foreign issuers and attempt to achieve capital appreciation.
Long/Short Debt strategies are designed to take advantage of perceived discrepancies in market prices related to credit assessments of individual issues and sectors by taking long and/or short positions in cash debt and debt-related securities, which may include corporate debt, sovereign debt, credit derivatives, bank loans, common and preferred stock, options and futures contracts, privately negotiated options, shares of investment companies, bonds, credit derivatives and other financial instruments.
Merger Arbitrage strategies typically involve buying and selling securities in companies being acquired or involved in a merger transaction. Generally, the investor will take “long” positions in the target company and “short” the acquiring company to lock in the spread between the two valuations. The investor may use leverage to enhance potential returns.
Convertible Arbitrage strategies typically involve buying “long” convertible debt or preferred equity instrument and selling “short” the related stock. The complex pricing relationship of convertibles allows for arbitrage managers to exploit the pricing inefficiencies between such securities.
Security Arbitrage strategies typically involve a simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in order to profit from a difference in the price.
31
Managed Futures strategies use systematic (e.g., trend-following) and/or other technical trading strategies in the futures and forward markets. Managed futures returns have historically displayed lower correlations to traditional asset classes.
Commodities strategies involve investing in physical goods like energy, metals, and agriculture through futures, ETFs, or related equities to diversify portfolios and hedge inflation.
The Fund’s investment team employs a fund-of-funds approach categorized by first-hand due diligence that includes detailed evaluation of investment vehicles and their investment managers to determine their suitability to provide exposure to a chosen asset class. On-going due diligence is a key element of the investment team’s process and includes monitoring factors such as consistent adherence to the investment process, style drift (explicit or implicit change in investment strategies or goals), strategy capacity (the ability to implement the investment strategy as assets grow) and the manager’s commitment to the fund, along with other factors such as market conditions. The investment team develops its strategic asset class allocation views across a broad range of asset classes based on its continuing analysis of global financial markets and macro-economic conditions.
In seeking to achieve the Fund’s investment objective and preserve capital, the Adviser may invest a significant portion of the Fund’s net assets in cash and cash equivalents.
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund
The Taxable Bond Fund is a “fund-of-funds” that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in Underlying Funds and may, to a limited extent, invest in SMAs. To achieve its investment objective, under normal market conditions, the Fund invests through Underlying Funds and SMAs at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of borrowings for investment purposes) in bonds and other fixed income securities.
The Taxable Bond Fund intends to allocate its assets to Underlying Funds and SMAs that primarily invest in various types of bonds and other securities, typically government and agency bonds, corporate bonds, notes, municipal securities, mortgage-related and asset-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, zero coupon bonds, bank loans, money market instruments, repurchase agreements, swaps, futures, options, credit default swaps, private placements and restricted securities. These investments may have interest rates that are fixed, variable or floating. The Underlying Funds and SMAs may invest in the U.S. and abroad, including international and emerging markets, and may purchase securities of any credit rating and varying maturities issued by domestic and foreign corporations, entities and governments.
In selecting Underlying Funds and SMAs, the Adviser will take asset diversification and potential volatility of return into account. The portfolio management team expects to actively evaluate each Underlying Fund and SMA based on its potential return, its risk level, and how it fits within the Fund’s overall portfolio in determining whether to buy or sell investments. The Adviser will also actively manage the Fund’s risk on an on-going basis to mitigate the risks of excessive losses by the portfolio overall.
The Underlying Funds consist of unaffiliated U.S. and foreign mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds. Because investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid, the Fund will not make any such investment if such investment would result in the Fund would holding more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid investments.
U.S. Government and Agency Bonds. U.S. government and agency bonds represent loans by investors to the U.S. Treasury or a wide variety of government agencies and instrumentalities. Securities issued by most U.S. government entities are neither guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury nor backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. These entities include, among others, the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs), the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC). Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and a small number of U.S. government agencies, such as the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The market values of U.S. government and agency securities and U.S. Treasury securities are subject to fluctuation.
Corporate Bonds. Corporate Bonds are IOUs issued by businesses that want to borrow money for some purpose—often to develop a new product or service, to expand into a new market, or to buy another company. As with other types of bonds, the issuer promises to repay the principal on a specific date and to make interest payments in the meantime. The amount of interest offered depends both on market conditions and on the financial health of the corporation issuing the bonds; a company whose credit rating is not strong will have to offer a higher interest rate to obtain buyers for its bonds.
Mortgage-Backed Securities. Mortgage-backed securities represent partial ownership interest in pools of commercial or residential mortgage loans made by financial institutions to finance a borrower’s real estate purchase. These loans are packaged by private or governmental issuers for sale to investors. As the underlying mortgage loans are paid by borrowers, the investors receive payments of interest and principal.
32
Asset-Backed Securities. Bonds that represent partial ownership in pools of consumer or commercial loans—most often credit card, automobile, or trade receivables are called asset-backed securities. Asset-backed securities, which can be types of corporate fixed income obligations, are issued by entities formed solely for that purpose, but their value ultimately depends on repayments by underlying borrowers. A primary risk of asset-backed securities is that their maturity is difficult to predict, being driven by borrowers’ prepayments.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs). CMOs are special bonds that are collateralized by mortgages or mortgage pass-through securities. Cash flow rights on underlying mortgages—the rights to receive principal and interest payments—are divided up and prioritized to create short-, intermediate-, and long-term bonds. CMOs rely on assumptions about the timing of cash flows on the underlying mortgages, including expected prepayment rates. The primary risk of a CMO is that these assumptions are wrong, which would either shorten or lengthen the bond’s maturity.
International Dollar-Denominated Bonds. International dollar-denominated bonds are denominated in U.S. dollars and issued by foreign governments and companies. Foreign bonds are subject to country risk, which is the chance that world events—such as political upheaval, financial troubles, or natural disasters—will adversely affect the value or liquidity of securities issued by companies in foreign countries. In addition, the prices of foreign bonds and the prices of U.S. bonds have, at times, moved in opposite directions. Because the bond’s value is designated in dollars rather than in the currency of the issuer’s country, the investor is not exposed to currency risk; rather, the issuer assumes that risk, usually to attract U.S. investors. Although currency movements do not affect the value of international dollar-denominated bonds directly, they could affect the value indirectly by adversely affecting the issuer’s ability (or the market’s perception of the issuer’s ability) to pay interest or repay principal.
Floating Rate and Variable Rate Obligations. Some debt securities have variable or floating interest rates. The interest rates on floating rate obligations change based on changes to a stated prevailing base market interest rate, such as a bank’s prime rate, the 91-day U.S. Treasury Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank certificates of deposit, the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or some other standard. The interest rate on a floating rate obligation is adjusted automatically at specified times to give effect to changes in the base rate. The interest rate on a variable rate obligation is adjusted at stated periodic intervals to reflect current market interest rates. Generally, the changes in the interest rate on floating and variable rate obligations reduce the fluctuation in their market value, so the potential for capital appreciation or depreciation is less than that for comparable fixed-rate obligations.
Floating rate and variable rate obligations may have features that permit the holder to recover the principal amount of the security at specified intervals, generally not exceeding one year, upon notice to the issuer. Variable rate obligations may have a demand feature that allows the holder to tender the obligation to the issuer or a third party at certain times, generally for par value plus accrued interest, according to the terms of the obligations. The issuer of a demand obligation normally has a corresponding right in its discretion, after a given period, to prepay the outstanding principal amount of the security plus accrued interest. The issuer usually must provide a specified number of days’ notice to the holder. Variable rate demand obligations may include master demand notes, which are obligations that permit the fund to invest fluctuating amounts in them.
The credit quality of a floating rate or variable rate obligation may be enhanced by being backed by a letter of credit or guarantee issued by a financial institution, corporation, the U.S. government or other entity.
Foreign Currency Bonds. Foreign currency bonds are denominated in the local currency of a non-U.S. country and issued by foreign governments, government agencies, and companies. To the extent that investments in foreign currency bonds are hedged, there is the risk that the currency hedging transactions entered into may not perfectly offset the foreign currency exposure.
Preferred Stocks. Preferred stocks distribute set dividends from the issuer. The preferred-stock holder’s claim on the issuer’s income and assets ranks before that of common-stock holders, but after that of bondholders.
Convertible Securities. Convertible securities are bonds or preferred stocks that are convertible into, or exchangeable for, common stocks.
Derivatives. Derivatives are securities whose value is derived from that of other securities or indices. Underlying Funds and SMAs may invest in derivative instruments including futures contracts; options, including options on swaps; currency swaps; foreign currency exchange forwards; interest rate swaps; total return swaps; credit default swaps; or other derivatives. They may also invest in U.S. Treasury futures for either cash management purposes or potentially to add value since they may be favorably priced.
Principal Investment Strategies Common to All Funds
Other Investment Companies and Pooled Investment Vehicles. The Funds may invest in securities of other investment companies, including U.S. and foreign open-end and closed-end funds and exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), that invest primarily in securities of the types in which the Fund may invest directly. Such investments may include investment companies managed by the sub-advisers or their affiliates. In addition, the Fund may invest a portion of its assets in other types of pooled investment vehicles that invest primarily in securities of the types in which the Fund may invest directly. ETFs and closed-end funds trade on a securities exchange and their shares may, at times, trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value. As a shareholder in a pooled investment vehicle, the Fund will bear its ratable share of that vehicle’s expenses, and would remain subject to payment of the Fund’s advisory and other fees with respect to assets so invested. Shareholders would, therefore, be subject to duplicative expenses to the extent the Fund invests in other pooled investment vehicles. With respect to assets of the Fund invested in investment companies managed by the sub-advisers or their affiliates, however, the Fund will not be charged the amount of the sub-advisers’ fees on those assets. In addition, the Fund will incur brokerage costs when purchasing and selling shares of ETFs. Securities of other pooled investment vehicles may be leveraged, in which case the value and/or yield of such securities will tend to be more volatile than securities of unleveraged vehicles.
33
Illiquid Securities. Each Fund may invest up to 15% of the value of its net assets in illiquid securities. Illiquid securities are securities that the Fund cannot sell or dispose of in the ordinary course of business within seven days at approximately the value at which the Fund carries the securities. These securities include restricted securities and repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days. Restricted securities are securities that may not be sold to the public without an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), and thus may be sold only in privately negotiated transactions or pursuant to an exemption from registration. Certain restricted securities that may be sold to institutional investors pursuant to Rule 144A under the 1933 Act and non-exempt commercial paper may be determined to be liquid by the Adviser or sub-advisers.
Temporary Defensive Positions. During periods of adverse market or economic conditions, each Fund may temporarily invest a substantial portion of its assets in cash equivalents, high quality fixed-income securities and money market instruments, and shares of money market mutual funds, or it may hold cash. At such times, a Fund would not be pursuing, and, therefore, may not achieve its stated investment objective with its usual investment strategies. The Funds may also hold these investments for liquidity purposes.
Portfolio Holdings Information. A description of the Funds’ policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio securities is available in the Fund’s SAI.
Principal Risks
The principal risks of investing in the Funds (F) are discussed below. As a result of investing in Underlying Funds and SMAs, the Funds may also be subject to the principal risks of the Underlying Funds (UF) and SMAs (SMA) described below. References in this section to a “fund” are to the Fund and Underlying Funds and SMAs in which the Fund may invest and references to investments and securities are to those held directly by the Fund, Underlying Funds and SMAs.
The absence of an “F” or “UF” or “SMA” indicates that the risk does not apply to that Fund. The value of a Fund’s investments may increase or decrease, sometimes dramatically, which will cause the value of the Fund’s shares to increase or decrease. As a result, you may lose money on your investment in a Fund, and there can be no assurance that a Fund will achieve its investment objective.
Risk |
Equity |
Municipal |
Defensive |
Taxable |
Alternative Strategies Risk | UF, SMA | |||
Asset Allocation Risk | F | F | F | |
Asset-Backed Securities Risk | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | ||
Call Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Commodity Risk | UF, SMA |
34
Risk |
Equity |
Municipal |
Defensive |
Taxable |
Counterparty Risk | UF | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA |
Covered Calls and Equity Collars | UF, SMA | |||
Credit Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Defaulted Securities Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Derivatives Risk | UF | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA |
Foreign Currency Exchange Forwards | UF | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Futures Contracts | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Options on Securities, Indices, and Currencies | UF | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA |
Swaps | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Emerging Markets Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Extension Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Floating Rate Loan Risk | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | ||
Focused Investment Risk | UF | |||
Foreign Securities and Currencies Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
High Yield Securities Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Illiquid Investments Risk | F | F | F | F |
Income Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Inflation-Indexed Bond Risk | UF, SMA | |||
Interest Rate Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Inverse Floaters Risk | F | UF, SMA | ||
Investment Style Risk | F | |||
Large Shareholder Risk | UF | UF | UF | |
Leverage Risk | UF | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA |
35
Risk |
Equity |
Municipal |
Defensive |
Taxable |
Management and Operational Risk | F | F | F | F |
Market Risk | F | F | F | F |
Models and Data Risk | F | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | ||
Municipal Lease Obligations Risk | F | |||
Non-Diversification Risk | F | |||
Political and Economic Risks | F | F | F | F |
Preferred Securities Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Prepayment Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
REIT and Real Estate Risk | UF, SMA | |||
Restricted Securities Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | |
Sector Risk | UF, SMA | UF, SMA | ||
Short Sale Risk | UF | UF | UF, SMA | UF, SMA |
Small and Mid-Cap Company Risk | F | UF, SMA | ||
Tax-Managed Investment Risk | F | |||
Tax Risk | F | |||
Underlying Fund Risk | F | F | F | F |
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk | F | UF, SMA | UF, SMA |
Alternative Strategies Risk: The performance of a fund that pursues alternative strategies is linked to the performance of highly volatile traditional and alternative asset classes (e.g., equities, fixed income, currencies and commodities). To the extent the Fund invests in such fund, the Fund’s share price will be exposed to potentially significant fluctuations in value. In addition, a fund that employs alternative strategies has the risk that anticipated opportunities do not play out as planned, resulting in potentially substantial losses to the fund. Furthermore, alternative strategies may employ leverage, involve extensive short positions and/or focus on narrow segments of the market, which may magnify the overall risks and volatility associated with such fund’s investments. Depending on the particular alternative strategies used by a fund, it may be subject to risks not associated with more traditional investments.
Asset Allocation Risk: The Fund is subject to different levels and combinations of risk, based on its actual allocation among various asset classes, Underlying Funds and SMAs, as applicable. The Fund will be exposed to risks of the Underlying Funds and SMAs in which it invests, as well as financial markets. To the extent the Fund invests in Underlying Funds and SMAs that expose it to non-traditional or alternative asset classes (which include investments that focus on a specialized asset class (e.g., long-short strategies)), as well as specific market sectors within a broader asset class, the Fund will be exposed to the increased risk associated with those asset classes. The potential impact of the risks related to an asset class depends on the size of the Fund’s investment allocation to it.
36
Asset-Backed Securities Risk: The risk that the impairment of the value of the collateral underlying the security in which a fund invests, such as non-payment of loans, will result in a reduction in the value of the security.
Call Risk: Debt securities are subject to call risk. Many bonds may be redeemed at the option of the issuer, or “called,” before their stated maturity date. In general, an issuer will call its bonds if they can be refinanced by issuing new bonds which bear a lower interest rate. A fund is subject to the possibility that during periods of falling interest rates, a bond issuer will call its high yielding bonds. A fund would then be forced to invest the unanticipated proceeds at lower interest rates, resulting in a decline in the Fund’s income.
Commodity Risk: The value of commodities may be more volatile than the value of equity securities or debt instruments and their value may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates, or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity. The price of a commodity may be affected by demand/supply imbalances in the market for the commodity.
Counterparty Risk: Transactions involving a counterparty or third party (other than the issuer of the instrument) are subject to the counterparty’s or third party’s credit risk and ability to perform in accordance with the terms of the transaction.
Covered Calls and Equity Collars: With respect to call options on individual equity securities, while a fund generally will write only covered call options, it may sell the instrument underlying a call option prior to entering into a closing purchase transaction on up to 10% of the fund’s net assets, provided that such sale will not occur more than three days prior to the option buy back. In an equity collar, a fund simultaneously writes a call option and purchases a put option on the same instrument. With respect to call options on equity indexes, the holdings of individual securities underlying the index is deemed by the investment adviser to be covering the call option sold. A fund may invest in uncovered call options when the security has been sold before the option expires.
Credit Risk: Credit risk is the risk that an issuer of a debt security may be unable or unwilling to make interest and principal payments when due and the related risk that the value of a debt security may decline because of concerns about the issuer’s ability or willingness to make such payments. Because a fund may significantly invest in high yield securities, the fund’s credit risks are greater than those of funds that buy only investment grade securities.
Defaulted Securities Risk: The risk of the uncertainty of repayment of defaulted securities (e.g., a security on which a principal or interest payment is not made when due) and obligations of distressed issuers.
Derivatives Risk: The use of derivatives by a fund can lead to losses because of adverse movements in the price or value of the asset, index, rate, instrument or economic measure underlying a derivative, due to failure of a counterparty, or due to tax or regulatory constraints. In addition, the successful use of derivatives depends in part on the future price fluctuations and the degree of correlation between the underlying securities. Unusual market conditions or the lack of a ready market for any particular derivative at a specific time may reduce the effectiveness of a fund’s derivate strategies and, for these and other reasons, the fund’s derivative strategies may not reduce the fund’s volatility to the extent desired. Derivatives for hedging purposes may not reduce risk if they are not sufficiently correlated to the position being hedged. Derivatives risk may be more significant when derivatives are used to enhance return or as a substitute for a position or security, rather than solely to hedge the risk of a position or security held by a fund. Derivatives may create economic leverage in a fund, which magnifies the fund’s exposure to the underlying investment. As a result, the loss on derivative transactions may substantially exceed the initial investment. Derivative instruments may be difficult to value, may be illiquid, and may be subject to wide swings in valuation caused by changes in the value of the underlying instrument. Derivatives that are traded “over the counter” also present credit risk (the risk that the other party to the derivative contract will not fulfill its contractual obligations, whether because of bankruptcy or other default).
Foreign Currency Exchange Forwards: Foreign currency exchange forwards are individually negotiated and privately traded contracts so they are dependent upon the creditworthiness of the counterparty. They are subject to the risk of political and economic factors applicable to the countries issuing the underlying currencies. Furthermore, unlike trading in most other types of instruments, there is no systematic reporting of last sale information with respect to the foreign currencies underlying forwards. As a result, available information may not be complete.
37
Futures Contracts: Futures are standardized, exchange-traded contracts that obligate a purchaser to take delivery, and a seller to make delivery, of a specific amount of an asset at a specified future date at a specified price. Futures contracts involve substantial leverage risk. A fund may also purchase or sell call and put options on futures contracts. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts and options are imperfect correlation, liquidity, unanticipated market movement and counterparty risk.
Options on Securities, Indices, and Currencies: A fund may engage in transactions in exchange traded and over-the-counter (“OTC”) options. There are several risks associated with transactions in options such as imperfect correlation, counterparty risk and an insufficient liquid secondary market for particular options. By buying a put option on a particular instrument, a fund pays a premium for the right to sell the underlying instrument at the exercise price, thus limiting the risk of loss through a decline in the market value of the instrument until the put option expires. A fund may purchase put options. The purchaser of an index put option has the right to receive a cash payment equal to any depreciation in the value of the index below the exercise price of the put option as of the valuation date of the option. Because their exercise is settled in cash, sellers of index put options cannot provide in advance for their potential settlement obligations by selling short the underlying securities. A fund may lose the premium paid for purchased options. A fund may also write (i.e., sell) put options. A fund will receive a premium for writing a put option, which may increase the return. In writing a put option on a particular instrument, a fund has the obligation to buy the underlying instrument at an agreed upon price if the price of such instrument decreases below the exercise price. In writing index put options, a fund will be responsible, during the option’s life, for any decreases in the value of the index below the exercise price of the put option. When an index put option is exercised, a fund will be required to deliver an amount of cash determined by the excess of the exercise price of the option over the value of the index at contract termination. Thus, the exercise of put options sold by a fund may require the fund to sell portfolio securities to generate cash at inopportune times or for unattractive prices.
A purchased call option on a particular instrument gives a fund the right to buy, and obligates the seller to sell, the underlying instrument at the exercise price at any time during the option period. The purchaser of an index call option has the right to receive a cash payment equal to any appreciation in the value of the index over the exercise price of the call option as of the valuation date of the option. Because their exercise is settled in cash, sellers of index call options cannot provide in advance for their potential settlement obligations by acquiring and holding the underlying securities. A fund may also write (i.e., sell) call options on instruments in which it may invest and to enter into closing purchase transactions with respect to such options. A call option is an option in which a fund, in return for a premium, gives another party a right to buy specified instruments owned by the fund at a specified future date and price set at the time of the contract. A fund’s ability to sell the instrument underlying a call option may be limited while the option is in effect unless the fund enters into a closing purchase transaction. Uncovered calls have speculative characteristics and are riskier than covered calls because there is no underlying instrument held by a fund that can act as a partial hedge. If the fund does not own the instrument underlying a written call option, it may be required to generate cash to purchase the security to meet the requirements of the option. As the writer of index call options, a fund will be responsible, during the option’s life, for any increases in the value of the index above the exercise price of the call option. When an index call option is exercised, a fund will be required to deliver an amount of cash determined by the excess of the value of the index at contract termination over the exercise price of the option.
In a put option spread, a fund writes out-of-the money index put options in combination with the purchase of index put options at a higher exercise price. This combination protects a fund against a decline in the index price, but only to the stated exercise price of the index option written. The premium received for writing a put option on an index offsets, in part, the premium paid to purchase the index put option. Put option spreads are designed to protect against a decline in value of an index to the extent of the difference between a put option purchased and a put option sold on the index. Entering into put option spreads is typically less expensive than a strategy of only purchasing index put options and in a flat to upwardly moving market may benefit the fund by reducing the cost of the downside protection, however, the downside protection is limited as compared to just owning an index put option. Accordingly, at times when a fund owns a put option spread instead of just owning an index put option, the fund’s risk of loss will be greater to the extent that the index’s loss exceeds the difference between the exercise price of the put option purchased and the put option written.
Options positions are marked to market daily. The value of options is affected by changes in the value and dividend rates of the securities underlying the option or represented in the index underlying the option, changes in interest rates, changes in the actual or perceived volatility of the relevant index or market, and the remaining time to the options’ expiration, as well as trading conditions in the options market.
Swaps: A swap contract is a commitment between two parties to make or receive payments based on agreed upon terms and whose value and payments are derived by changes in the value of an underlying financial instrument. Swap transactions can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names. Depending on their structure, swap transactions may increase or decrease exposure to long-term or short-term interest rates, foreign currency values, corporate borrowing rates, or other factors such as security prices, values of baskets of securities, or inflation rates. Interest rate swaps are contracts involving the exchange between two contracting parties of their respective commitments to pay or receive interest (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments). Credit default swaps are contracts whereby one party makes periodic payments to a counterparty in exchange for the right to receive from the counterparty a payment equal to the par (or other agreed-upon) value of an underlying debt obligation in the event of default by the issuer of the debt security. Total return swaps are contracts in which one party agrees to make periodic payments based on the change in market value of the underlying assets, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or security indexes during the specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate of the total return from other underlying assets. Depending on how they are used, swap transactions may increase or decrease the overall volatility of a portfolio. The most significant factor in the performance of a swap transaction is the change in the specific interest rate, currency, individual equity values or other factors that determine the amounts of payments due to and from a fund.
38
Emerging Markets Risk: Emerging markets involve risks in addition to and greater than those generally associated with investing in more developed foreign markets. Numerous emerging market countries have a history of, and continue to experience serious, and potentially continuing, economic and political problems. Stock markets in many emerging market countries are relatively small, expensive to trade and risky. Foreigners are often limited in their ability to invest in, and withdraw assets from, these markets. Additional restrictions may be imposed under other conditions. In addition, frontier market countries generally have smaller economies or less developed capital markets and, as a result, the risks of investing in emerging market countries are magnified in frontier market countries.
Extension Risk: The risk that if interest rates rise, repayments of principal on certain debt securities, including, but not limited to, floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, may occur at a slower rate than expected and the expected maturity of those securities could lengthen as a result. Securities that are subject to extension risk generally have a greater potential for loss when prevailing interest rates rise, which could cause their values to fall sharply.
Floating Rate Loan Risk: Floating rate loans generally are subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans sometimes trade infrequently in the secondary market. As a result, valuing a floating rate loan can be more difficult, and buying and selling a floating rate loan at an acceptable price can be more difficult or delayed. Difficulty in selling a floating rate loan can result in a loss. In addition, a floating rate loan may not be fully collateralized, which may cause the floating rate loan to decline significantly in value. Floating rate loans issued by banks may be subject to extended trade settlement periods longer than seven days, which may delay a fund’s ability to pay redemption proceeds during a period of high volume shareholder redemptions. Such loans may not be considered securities and, therefore, may not be afforded the protections of the federal securities laws.
Focused Investment Risk: Investments focused in a limited number of countries, regions, sectors, industries, or issuers (or in sectors within a country or region) that are subject to the same or similar risk factors and investments whose prices are closely correlated are subject to greater overall risk than investments that are more diversified or whose prices are not as closely correlated. If a fund invests in the securities of a limited number of issuers, a decline in the market price of a particular security held by the fund may affect the fund’s performance more than if the fund invested in the securities of a larger number of issuers.
Foreign Securities and Currencies Risk: Investing in securities of foreign companies, including depositary receipts and foreign funds, involves risks generally not associated with investments in the securities of U.S. companies. These risks may relate to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, unreliable and untimely information about issuers, and political and economic instability. Foreign security prices are affected by political, social, economic, and other conditions that are unique to a particular country or region. These conditions may relate to the existence of less publicly available information, inferior regulatory oversight (for example, less demanding accounting, auditing, corporate governance, investor relations, and financial reporting standards), the possibility of government-imposed restrictions, and even the nationalization of assets. The liquidity of foreign investments may be more limited than for comparable U.S. investments and, at times, it may be difficult to sell foreign securities at favorable prices. Currency risk results from changes in the rate of exchange between the currency of the country in which a foreign company is domiciled or keeps its books and the U.S. dollar. Whenever a fund holds securities valued in a foreign currency or holds the currency itself in connection with its purchases and sales of foreign securities, changes in the exchange rate add to or subtract from the value of the investment in U.S. dollars.
High Yield Securities Risk: High yield securities, which are rated below investment grade and commonly referred to as “junk” bonds, are high risk investments that may cause income and principal losses for a fund. They generally have greater credit risk, are less liquid, and have more volatile prices than investment grade securities. Defaulted bonds are speculative and involve substantial risks in addition to the risks of investing in high yield securities that have not defaulted. A fund generally will not receive interest payments on the defaulted bonds and there is a substantial risk that principal will not be repaid. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a defaulted bond, a fund may lose its entire investment.
39
Illiquid Investments Risk: A fund may purchase securities that have legal or contractual restrictions on resale or that are illiquid (for example, derivative instruments) and a fund’s investment in certain private investments would be treated as illiquid. In addition, liquid securities purchased by a fund may become illiquid because of issuer-specific events or changes in market conditions. A fund’s investment in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid. Illiquid investments are subject to the risk that a fund will not be able to sell the investments when desired or at favorable prices. If, as a result of changes in the values of securities held by the Fund, the value of holdings by the Fund of illiquid securities exceeds 15% of the value of the Fund’s net assets, the Adviser will take appropriate actions to reduce the Fund’s holdings of illiquid securities to 15% of the value of the Fund’s net assets as soon as reasonably practicable, in a manner consistent with prudent management and the interests of the Fund.
Income Risk: A fund’s income could decline during periods of falling interest rates.
Inflation-Indexed Bond Risk: The risk that such bonds will change in value in response to actual or anticipated changes in inflation rates in a manner unanticipated by a fund’s portfolio management team or investors generally. Inflation-indexed bonds are subject to debt securities risks.
Interest Rate Risk: Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a fund’s portfolio will decline because of rising interest rates. A fund may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates than would normally be the case due to the current period of historically low rates and the effect of potential government fiscal policy initiatives and resulting market reaction to those initiatives. When interest rates change, the values of longer-duration debt securities usually change more than the values of shorter-duration debt securities.
Inverse Floaters Risk: The use of inverse floaters by a fund creates effective leverage. Due to the leveraged nature of these investments, the value of an inverse floater will increase and decrease to a significantly greater extent than the values of the TOB trust’s underlying municipal bonds in response to changes in market interest rates or credit quality. An investment in inverse floaters typically will involve greater risk than an investment in a fixed rate municipal bond, including, in the case of recourse inverse floaters (discussed below), the risk that a fund may lose more than its original principal investment.
Distributions on inverse floaters bear an inverse relationship to short-term municipal bond interest rates. Thus, distributions paid to the fund on its inverse floaters will be reduced or even eliminated as short-term municipal interest rates rise and will increase when short-term municipal interest rates fall. The greater the amount of floaters sold by a TOB trust relative to the inverse floaters (i.e., the greater the effective leverage of the inverse floaters), the more volatile the distributions on the inverse floaters will be. Inverse floaters generally will underperform the market for fixed rate municipal bonds in a rising interest rate environment.
A fund may invest in recourse inverse floaters. With such an investment, the fund will be required to reimburse the liquidity provider of a TOB trust for any shortfall between the outstanding amount of any floaters and the value of the municipal bonds in the TOB trust in the event the floaters cannot be successfully remarketed, which could cause the fund to lose money in excess of its investment.
A TOB trust may be terminated without the fund’s consent upon the occurrence of certain events, such as the bankruptcy or default of the issuer of the securities in the trust. If that happens, the floaters will be redeemed at par (plus accrued interest) out of the proceeds from the sale of securities in the TOB trust, and the fund will be entitled to the remaining proceeds, if any. Thus, if there is a decrease in the value of the securities held in the TOB trust, the fund may lose some or all of the principal amount of its investment in the inverse floaters. As noted above, in the case of recourse inverse floaters, a fund could lose money in excess of its investment.
Investment Style Risk: The risk that securities selected as part of a low volatility or quality strategy and growth or value investing style may underperform other segments of the equity markets or the equity markets as a whole. Low volatility and quality investing tend to perform differently and shift into and out of favor with investors depending on changes in market and economic conditions. Similarly, the growth or value assessment of a company may not be accurate. As a result, a fund’s performance may at times be worse than the performance of other mutual funds that invest more broadly or in securities of a different investment style.
Large Shareholder Risk: To the extent that a large number of shares of the Underlying Fund is held by a single shareholder or a group of shareholders with a common investment strategy, the Underlying Fund is subject to the risk that a redemption by those shareholders of all or a large portion of their Underlying Fund shares will require the Underlying Fund to sell securities at disadvantageous prices or otherwise disrupt the Underlying Fund’s operations.
Leverage Risk: Investments in futures contracts, forward contracts, swaps, and other derivative instruments provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure, as well as the potential for greater loss. Financial leverage magnifies exposure to the swings in prices of an asset underlying a derivative instrument and results in increased volatility, which means a fund will have the potential for greater gains, as well as the potential for greater losses, than if the Fund does not use derivative instruments that have a leveraging effect. Leveraging tends to magnify, sometimes significantly, the effect of any increase or decrease in a fund’s exposure to an asset and may cause the fund’s net asset value to be volatile. For example, if the portfolio manager seeks to gain enhanced exposure to a specific asset through a derivative instrument providing leveraged exposure to the asset and that derivative instrument increases in value, the gain to a fund will be magnified; however, if that investment decreases in value, the loss to the fund will be magnified. A decline in a fund’s assets due to losses magnified by the derivative instruments providing leveraged exposure may require the fund to liquidate portfolio positions to satisfy its obligations or to meet redemption requests when it may not be advantageous to do so. There is no assurance that the use of derivative instruments providing enhanced exposure will enable a fund to achieve its investment objective.
40
Management and Operational Risk: A fund runs the risk that investment techniques will fail to produce desired results. A fund also runs the risk that the assessment of an investment (including a company’s fundamental fair (or intrinsic) value) may be wrong or that deficiencies in adviser’s or another service provider’s internal systems or controls will cause losses for the fund or impair fund’s operations.
Market Risk: Investments in securities, in general, are subject to market risks that may cause their prices to fluctuate over time. The market price of a security or instrument could decline, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably, due to general market conditions that are not specifically related to a particular company, such as real or perceived adverse economic or political conditions throughout the world, changes in the general outlook for corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates or adverse investor sentiment generally. The market value of a security may also decline because of factors that affect a particular industry or industries, such as labor shortages or increased production costs and competitive conditions within an industry. Changes in market conditions generally do not have the same impact on all types of securities and instruments. Local, regional, or global events such as war, acts of terrorism, the spread of infectious illness or other public health issues, recessions, political and regulatory changes, or other events could have a significant impact on the market generally and on specific securities. For example, in recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic, the large expansion of government deficits and debt as a result of government actions to mitigate the effects of the pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the rise of inflation, and trade policy changes have resulted in extreme volatility in the global economy and in global financial markets. Economies and financial markets throughout the world are becoming increasingly interconnected. As a result, whether or not the Fund invests in securities of issuers located in or with significant exposure to countries experiencing economic and financial difficulties, the value and liquidity of the Fund’s investments may be negatively affected.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk: The risk that borrowers may default on their mortgage obligations or the guarantees underlying the mortgage-backed securities will default or otherwise fail and that, during periods of falling interest rates, mortgage-backed securities will be called or prepaid, which may result in a fund having to reinvest proceeds in other investments at a lower interest rate. During periods of rising interest rates, the average life of a mortgage-backed security may extend, which may lock in a below-market interest rate, increase the security’s duration, and reduce the value of the security. Enforcing rights against the underlying assets or collateral may be difficult, or the underlying assets or collateral may be insufficient if the issuer defaults. The values of certain types of mortgage-backed securities, such as inverse floaters and interest-only and principal-only securities, may be extremely sensitive to changes in interest rates and prepayment rates.
Models and Data Risk: When Models and Data prove to be incorrect or incomplete, any decisions made in reliance thereon expose a fund to potential risks. For example, by relying on Models and Data, the portfolio manager may be induced to buy certain investments at prices that are too high, to sell certain other investments at prices that are too low, or to miss favorable opportunities altogether. Similarly, any hedging based on faulty Models and Data may prove to be unsuccessful. Some of the models used by a portfolio manager are predictive in nature. The use of predictive models has inherent risks. For example, such models may incorrectly forecast future behavior, leading to potential losses on a cash flow and/or a mark-to-market basis. In addition, in unforeseen or certain low-probability scenarios (often involving a market disruption of some kind), such models may produce unexpected results, which can result in losses. Furthermore, because predictive models are usually constructed based on historical data supplied by third parties, the success of relying on such models may depend heavily on the accuracy and reliability of the supplied historical data. All models rely on correct market data inputs. If incorrect market data is entered into even a well-founded model, the resulting information will be incorrect. However, even if market data is input correctly, “model prices” will often differ substantially from market prices, especially for securities with complex characteristics, such as derivative securities.
Municipal Lease Obligations Risk: A fund may purchase participation interests in municipal leases. These are undivided interests in a lease, installment purchase contract, or conditional sale contract entered into by a state or local government unit to acquire equipment or facilities. Participation interests in municipal leases pose special risks because many leases and contracts contain “non-appropriation” clauses that provide that the governmental issuer has no obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for this purpose by the appropriate legislative body. Although these kinds of obligations are secured by the leased equipment or facilities, it might be difficult and time consuming to dispose of the equipment or facilities in the event of nonappropriation and a fund might not recover the full principal amount of the obligation.
41
Non-Diversification Risk: As a non-diversified fund under the 1940 Act, a fund may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of fewer issuers as compared with diversified funds. To the extent a fund invests in a relatively small number of issuers, a decline in the market value of a particular issuer held by the Fund may affect its value more than if it invested in a larger number of issuers and the value of the Fund’s shares may be more volatile than the values of shares of more diversified funds.
Political and Economic Risks: The values of securities may be adversely affected by local political and economic conditions and developments. Adverse conditions in an industry significant to a local economy could have a correspondingly adverse effect on the financial condition of local issuers. Other factors that could affect securities include a change in the local, state, or national economy, demographic factors, ecological or environmental concerns, statutory limitations on the issuer’s ability to increase taxes, and other developments generally affecting the revenue of issuers (for example, legislation or court decisions reducing state aid to local governments or mandating additional services). This risk would be heightened to the extent that a fund invests a substantial portion of the below-investment grade quality portion of its portfolio in the bonds of similar projects (such as those relating to the education, health care, housing, transportation, or utilities industries), in industrial development bonds, or in particular types of municipal securities (such as general obligation bonds, private activity bonds, or moral obligation bonds) that are particularly exposed to specific types of adverse economic, business, or political events.
To the extent that a fund invests a significant portion of its assets in the securities of issuers located in a particular state or U.S. territory, it will be disproportionally affected by political and economic conditions and developments in that state or territory. In addition, economic, political, or regulatory changes in that state or territory could adversely affect municipal bond issuers in that state or territory and therefore the value of a fund’s investment portfolio.
Preferred Securities Risk: Preferred securities may pay fixed or adjustable rates of return. Preferred securities are subject to issuer-specific and market risks applicable generally to equity securities. In addition, a company’s preferred securities generally pay dividends only after the company makes required payments to holders of its bonds and other debt. For this reason, the value of preferred securities will usually react more strongly than bonds and other debt to actual or perceived changes in the company’s financial condition or prospects. Preferred securities of smaller companies may be more vulnerable to adverse developments than preferred stock of larger companies.
Prepayment Risk: The risk that the issuer of a debt security, including floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, repays all or a portion of the principal prior to the security’s maturity. In times of declining interest rates, there is a greater likelihood that a fund’s higher yielding securities will be pre-paid with the fund being unable to reinvest the proceeds in an investment with as great a yield. Prepayments can therefore result in lower yields to shareholders of a fund.
REIT and Real Estate Risk: Investment in REITs and real estate involves the risks that are associated with direct ownership of real estate and with the real estate industry in general. These risks include risks related to general, regional and local economic conditions; fluctuations in interest rates; property tax rates, zoning laws, environmental regulations and other governmental action; cash flow dependency; increased operating expenses; lack of availability of mortgage funds; losses due to natural disasters; changes in property values and rental rates; and other factors.
Restricted Securities Risk: A fund may hold securities that are restricted as to resale under the U.S. federal securities laws. There can be no assurance that a trading market will exist at any time for any particular restricted security. Limitations on the resale of these securities may prevent a fund from disposing of them promptly at reasonable prices or at all. A fund may have to bear the expense of registering the securities for resale and the risk of substantial delays in effecting the registration. Also, restricted securities may be difficult to value because market quotations may not be readily available, and the values of restricted securities may have significant volatility.
Sector Risk: At times, a fund may have a significant portion of its assets invested in securities of companies conducting business in a broadly related group of industries within an economic sector. Companies in the same economic sector may be similarly affected by economic or market events, making a fund more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in that economic sector than funds that invest more broadly.
Short Sale Risk: A short sale typically involves the sale of a security that is borrowed from a broker or other institution to complete the sale. Short sales expose the seller to the risk that it will be required to acquire securities to replace the borrowed securities (also known as “covering” the short position) at a time when the securities sold short have appreciated in value, thus resulting in a loss. The seller of a short position generally realizes a profit on the transaction if the price it receives on the short sale exceeds the cost of closing out the position by purchasing securities in the market, but generally realizes a loss if the cost of closing out the short position exceeds the proceeds of the short sale.
42
Small and Mid-Cap Company Risk: In general, smaller capitalization companies are more vulnerable than larger companies to adverse business or economic developments and they may have more limited resources. Securities of small and mid-cap companies are often less liquid than those of large companies and this could make it difficult to sell such securities at a desired time or price. As a result, small and mid-cap company stocks may fluctuate relatively more in price.
Tax-Managed Investment Risk: Market conditions may limit fund’s ability to implement its tax-managed approach. For example, market conditions may limit the fund’s ability to generate tax losses or to generate qualified dividend income, which is generally taxed to noncorporate shareholders at favorable rates, or dividends eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations. The tax-managed strategy may affect the investment decisions made for a fund. For example, the fund’s tax-managed strategy may cause a fund to hold a security in order to achieve more favorable tax-treatment or to sell a security in order to create tax losses. The fund’s ability to utilize various tax-management techniques may be curtailed or eliminated in the future by legislation or regulation. Although the fund expects that a smaller portion of its total return will consist of taxable distributions to shareholders as compared to non-tax managed funds, there can be no assurance about the size of taxable distributions to shareholders. The performance of the fund may deviate from that of non-tax managed funds and may not provide as high a return before or after consideration of federal income tax consequences as non-tax managed funds. The fund’s tax-sensitive investment strategy involves active management, which may cause the fund to realize capital gains.
Tax Risk: The Municipal Bond Fund will rely on the opinion of issuers’ bond counsel on the tax-exempt status of interest on municipal bond obligations. Neither the fund nor its sub-advisers will independently review the bases for those tax opinions, which may ultimately be determined to be incorrect and subject the fund and its shareholders to substantial tax liabilities. Interest from municipal bonds held by a fund could become subject to regular federal income tax because of, among other things, unfavorable changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by regulatory authorities, or noncompliant conduct by bond issuers. Proposals have been introduced in Congress to restrict or eliminate the federal income tax exemption for interest on municipal securities, and similar proposals may be introduced in the future. Proposed “flat tax” and “value added tax” proposals would also have the effect of eliminating the tax preference for municipal securities. Some of the past proposals would have applied to interest on municipal securities issued before the date of enactment, which would have adversely affected their value to a material degree. If such a proposal were enacted, the availability of municipal securities for investment by a fund and the value of the fund’s portfolio would be adversely affected. A fund focused on investment in municipal obligations may not be a preferable investment for IRAs and other tax-deferred arrangements.
Underlying Fund Risk: The actual cost of investing in a mutual fund that invests in other investment companies and pooled investment vehicles may be higher than the cost of investing in a mutual fund that only invests directly in individual securities. A fund will bear its pro rata portion of the expenses of the underlying funds in addition to its own direct expenses. By investing in underlying funds, the fund is subject to the risks associated with the underlying funds’ investments. An underlying fund may change its investment objective or policies without the fund’s approval, which could force a fund to withdraw its investment from such underlying fund at a time that is unfavorable to the fund. A fund’s investment performance is directly tied to the performance of the underlying funds and other investments in which the fund invests. If one or more of the underlying funds fails to meet its investment objective, or otherwise performs poorly, the fund’s performance could be negatively affected. There can be no assurance that an underlying fund will achieve its investment objective. With respect to an underlying fund whose shares trade on an exchange, its shares may trade below their net asset value or at a discount, which may adversely affect the fund’s performance. In addition, there can be no assurance that an active trading market will exist for the shares of an exchange-traded underlying fund. The Fund’s investments in unaffiliated limited partnerships, including hedge funds, may be illiquid. Illiquid investments are subject to the risk that the Fund will not be able to sell the investments when desired or at favorable prices.
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk: Zero coupon bonds do not pay interest on a current basis and may be highly volatile as interest rates rise or fall. In addition, while such bonds generate income for purposes of generally accepted accounting standards, they do not generate cash flow and thus could cause a fund to be forced to liquidate securities at an inopportune time in order to distribute cash, as required by tax laws.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS
Investment Adviser
Aspiriant, LLC, located at 11100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 90025, serves as the investment adviser to the Funds. The Adviser provides state-of-the-art, global investment solutions across every asset class, as well as unparalleled depth and sophistication in addressing the most complex aspects of wealth management. As of May 31, 2025, the Adviser had approximately $16 billion in assets under management.
43
The Adviser manages and supervises the investment of each Fund’s assets on a discretionary basis. The Adviser oversees the Funds’ sub-advisers to ensure their compliance with the investment strategies and policies of the Funds. The Board oversees the Adviser and the sub-advisers and establishes policies that the Adviser and sub-advisers must follow in their management activities. The Adviser is responsible for paying the sub-advisers for their services to the Funds.
Equity Allocation Fund - For the advisory services it provides pursuant to the advisory agreement, the Adviser is entitled to a fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.24% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser has contractually agreed, however, to waive its advisory fee from 0.24% to 0.16% through July 31, 2026. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser at an annual rate of 0.16% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Trust's Form N-CSR dated March 31, 2025 provides information regarding the basis for the Board’s most recent approval of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with the Adviser and sub-advisory agreements with Aperio, GMO and Wellington.
Municipal Bond Fund - For the advisory services it provides pursuant to the advisory agreement, the Adviser is entitled to a fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.27% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser has contractually agreed, however, to waive its advisory fee from 0.27% to 0.21% through July 31, 2026. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser at an annual rate of 0.21% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Trust's Form N-CSR dated March 31, 2025 provides information regarding the basis for the Board’s most recent approval of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreements with Allspring Investments, Nuveen and MacKay Shields.
Defensive Allocation Fund - For the advisory services it provides pursuant to the advisory agreement, the Adviser is entitled to a fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.10% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser at an annual rate of 0.10% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Trust's Form N-CSR dated March 31, 2025 provides information regarding the basis for the Board’s most recent approval of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.
Taxable Bond Fund - For the advisory services it provides pursuant to the advisory agreement, the Adviser is entitled to a fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser has contractually agreed, however, to waive its advisory fee from 0.25% to 0.08% through July 31, 2026. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser at an annual rate of 0.08% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Trust's Form N-CSR dated March 31, 2025 provides information regarding the basis for the Board’s most recent approval of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement.
The Adviser may recommend to the Board that a sub-adviser be hired, terminated, or replaced, or that the terms of an existing sub-advisory agreement be revised. Pursuant to an exemptive order from the SEC, the Adviser, subject to certain conditions, has the right, without shareholder approval, to hire an unaffiliated sub-adviser or materially amend the terms of a sub-advisory agreement with an unaffiliated sub-adviser when the Board and the Adviser believe that a change would benefit a Fund. The prospectus will be supplemented when there is a significant change in a Fund’s advisory arrangement.
Sub-Advisers
Allspring Investments serves as a sub-adviser to the Municipal Bond Fund. Allspring Investments was established in 2021 with its headquarter location of 1415 Vantage Park Drive, 3rd Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203. As of March 31, 2025, Allspring Investments had approximately $446 billion in assets under management.
Aperio serves as a sub-adviser for the Equity Allocation Fund’s quality strategy. Located at Three Harbor Drive, Suite 204, Sausalito, CA 94965, Aperio was organized in 1999 and provides investment management services to individuals, institutions, and registered investment companies. As of May 31, 2025, Aperio had approximately $122 billion in assets under management.
GMO serves as a sub-adviser for the Equity Allocation Fund’s quality strategy. Located at 53 State Street, 33rd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, GMO was organized in 1977 and provides a broad range of investment management advisory services, predominantly to institutional clients. As of May 31, 2025, GMO had approximately $66 billion in assets under management.
MacKay Shields serves as a sub-adviser to the Municipal Bond Fund. Located at 299 Park Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, New York 10171, MacKay Shields was organized in 1938 and provides a broad range of investment advisory services to institutional and individual clients. As of May 31, 2025, MacKay Shields had approximately $152 billion in assets under management.
Nuveen serves as a sub-adviser to the Municipal Bond Fund. Located at 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606, Nuveen was organized in 1989 and provides investment management services to a broad range of institutional and individual clients. As of May 31, 2025, Nuveen had approximately $1,286 billion in assets under management.
44
Wellington serves as a sub-adviser for the Equity Allocation Fund’s global quality growth strategy. Located at 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts, Wellington was organized in 1933 and provides a broad range of investment management advisory services to institutional clients. As of May 31, 2025, Wellington had approximately $1.26 trillion in assets under management.
Portfolio Managers
John Allen, CFA, is Chief Investment Officer (“CIO”) at the Adviser. Mr. Allen joined the Adviser as CIO in 2014. Prior to joining the Adviser he was a senior member of the client service team at Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo (“GMO”) from 2009 to 2014. Prior to joining GMO, Mr. Allen was Head of Investments at a large family office. He began working in the financial services industry in the investment banking department at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette and business consulting practice of Stern Stewart & Company.
Marc Castellani, CFA, CAIA, CIMA, is Managing Director of Private Investments at the Adviser. Mr. Castellani joined the Adviser in 2015. Prior to joining the Adviser, he worked at J.P. Morgan Private Bank in Los Angeles from 2012 to 2015. Prior to joining J.P. Morgan Private Bank, he worked at U.S. Trust from 2010 to 2012. Previously, Mr. Castellani worked in Merger and Acquisitions of J.P. Morgan and Banc of America Securities. He began his career in the financial services industry as an Associate in the corporate finance advisory practice of Stern Stewart & Company.
Robert Miller joined Allspring Investments (formerly Wells Capital Management, Inc.) in 2008, where he currently serves as a Senior Portfolio Manager for the Municipal Fixed Income team.
Nicholos Venditti joined Allspring Investments (formerly Wells Capital Management, Inc.) in 2020, where he currently serves as a Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of the Municipal Fixed Income team. Prior to joining Allspring Investments, Mr. Venditti spent 10 years at Thornburg Investment Management, most recently as a Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of the Municipal Bond Group.
Terry J. Goode joined Allspring Investments (formerly Wells Capital Management, Inc.) in 2002, where he currently serves as a Senior Portfolio Manager for the Municipal Fixed Income team and was formerly Head of the Tax-Exempt Research team.
Ran Leshem is Head of SMA Solutions. Previously, he was Co-Head of Aperio and Chief Investment Officer. Prior to joining Aperio in 2006, Mr. Leshem was manager of operating strategy at GAP, Inc. He has extensive expertise in applying quantitative techniques and information technology to operational problems. Mr. Leshem received a Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from the University of Waterloo, Canada, where he received the Hewlett Packard Award for academic excellence, and his M.B.A from University of California, Berkeley.
Brian Ko is a Lead Portfolio Manager at Aperio and shares primary responsibility for managing the portfolio analysis efforts of Aperio. Mr. Ko also provides analytical support in the research, portfolio management, and trading of Aperio’s client portfolios. Prior to joining Aperio in 2014, he was a Senior Client Operations Associate at Lateef Investment Management from 2012 to 2014. Brian was also a Fund Accounting Manager with State Street Bank and Trust. He received his BS in Managerial Economics from the University of California, Davis, and his MS in Financial Analysis from Saint Mary’s College of California.
Michael Branch is a Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of Investment Oversight and Research at Aperio. Mr. Branch joined Aperio in 2007 and provides analytical support in the research, portfolio management, and investment oversight of client portfolios. Mr. Branch holds a BS in Finance from the University of Arizona and is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charterholder.
Willie Kwan is a Lead Portfolio Manager at Aperio and shares primary responsibility for managing the portfolio analysis efforts of Aperio. Mr. Kwan also provides analytical support in the research, portfolio management, and trading of client portfolios. Prior to joining Aperio in 2016, he was a Senior Manager at Charles Schwab Investment Management, where he was the index subject matter expert. Before Schwab, he managed the portfolio analytics content team at Thomson Reuters. He received his BA in Economics from Brandeis University.
Tom Hancock is the head of the Focused Equity team, a portfolio manager for GMO’s Quality Strategies, and a partner of the firm. Previously, Mr. Hancock was co-head of GMO’s Global Equity team. Prior to joining GMO in 1995, he was a research scientist at Siemens and a software engineer at IBM. Mr. Hancock holds BS and MS degrees from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a PhD in Computer Science from Harvard University.
Anthony Hene is a portfolio manager for GMO’s Quality Strategies. Mr. Hene is a member of the Focused Equity team and a partner of the firm. Previously, he was engaged in portfolio management within GMO’s Global Equity team. Mr. Hene joined GMO full-time in 1995. He has an MSc in Biochemistry from the University of Oxford and is a CFA charterholder.
45
Ty Cobb is a portfolio manager for GMO’s Quality Strategies. Mr. Cobb is a member of the Focused Equity team and a partner of the firm. Previously, he led the fundamental research group for GMO’s Global Equity team. Prior to joining GMO in 1997, he worked at Brown Brothers Harriman. Mr. Cobb received a bachelor’s degree in Economics/Russian Language from Bucknell University and an MS in Finance from Suffolk University. He is a CFA charterholder.
Michael Denlinger, CFA, is a Managing Director and portfolio manager at MacKay Shields. Prior to joining MacKay Shields in 2019, Mr. Denlinger was an institutional municipal credit trader at Bank of America Merrill Lynch with a primary focus on taxable and healthcare securities. Prior to trading credit, he was a high grade municipal trader. Mr. Denlinger earned a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Johns Hopkins University in 2014 and an MBA from the University of North Carolina Kenan-Flagler Business School in 2022. He has been in the financial services industry since 2014. Mr. Denlinger holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a member of the CFA Institute.
Robert DiMella, CFA, is an Executive Managing Director of MacKay Shields and Co-Head of MacKay Municipal ManagersTM. Previously, he was the President and co-founder of Mariner Municipal Managers LLC (2007 to 2009). He has been a municipal portfolio manager since 1992, with a broad range of trading and portfolio management experience in the municipal markets. He was a Managing Director and Co-Head of BlackRock’s Municipal Portfolio Management Group (from 2006 to 2007). Prior to BlackRock’s merger with Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (MLIM), he served as a Senior Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of the Municipal Products Group. He was employed by Merrill Lynch from 1993 to 2006. He is a member of MacKay’s Senior Leadership Team. Mr. DiMella earned his Master’s degree at Rutgers University Business School and a Bachelor’s Degree at the University of Connecticut. He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a member of the CFA Institute.
Daniel J. Close, CFA, is Senior Managing Director, Portfolio Manager and Head of Municipals at Nuveen. Before being named Head of Municipals in 2023, he was Head of Taxable Municipals. He began his career in the financial services industry in 1998 and joined Nuveen in 2000. He served as a member of the product management and development team and then as a municipal fixed income research analyst before assuming portfolio management responsibilities in 2007.
Paul L. Brennan, CFA, is Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at Nuveen. He began his career in the financial industry in 1991 as a municipal credit analyst for Flagship Financial Inc. (“Flagship”) before becoming a portfolio manager at Flagship in 1994. Mr. Brennan joined Nuveen in 1997 when Nuveen acquired Flagship.
Stephen Candido, CFA, is Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at Nuveen. He entered the financial services industry in 1996 and became a portfolio manager in 2016. Previously, he served as Vice President and Senior Research Analyst at Nuveen, specializing in high yield sectors including land secured credits, project finance and housing.
Steven C. Angeli, CFA, is an Equity Portfolio Manager, Partner, and leader of the Quality Growth Team at Wellington. Prior to joining Wellington in 1994, Mr. Angeli worked as an associate analyst focusing on fixed income securities, including debt/equity private placements, at Fidelity Management and Research (1990 – 1992). Mr. Angeli earned his MBA from the University of Virginia (Darden, 1994) and his BS in finance from Boston College (1990). Additionally, he holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a member of the CFA Institute and the CFA Society Boston.
Information about portfolio manager compensation, other accounts managed by the portfolio managers, and portfolio manager ownership of securities can be found in the SAI.
VALUING SHARES
The net asset value (“NAV”) of a Fund’s shares is determined once daily as of the regularly scheduled close of normal trading of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time), on each day the NYSE is open for business. A Fund calculates its NAV per share by dividing the value of its net assets (i.e., the value of its assets less its liabilities) by the total number of shares outstanding. A Fund’s investments are valued at their market value or, if market quotations are not readily available, at their fair value as determined by the Adviser, which has been designated by the Board as its valuation designee (“Valuation Designee”) to perform the fair valuation determinations subject to Board oversight and certain reporting and other requirements designed to facilitate the Board’s ability to oversee the Valuation Designee’s fair value determinations.
Assets of the Fund invested in a registered open-end management investment company, with the exception of exchange traded open-end investment companies, are valued at the investment company’s applicable net asset value, which is calculated as described in its prospectus. Securities of a Fund traded on foreign stock exchanges are generally valued based upon the closing prices for those securities on the principal exchanges where the securities are traded, subject to possible adjustment as described below. The value of non-dollar-denominated portfolio securities held by a Fund are determined by converting all assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currency values into U.S. dollar values, based on exchange rates supplied by a quotation service. Futures are valued at the settlement price established each day by the board of exchange on which they are traded and are provided by an independent source. The investments in private funds, that are not publicly traded, such as limited partnerships, limited liability companies and exempted companies, are typically valued using NAV as a practical expedient, as reported by the private funds’ managers and their agent, subject to review of the Valuation Designee. Such values are calculated according to the valuation policies of the particular private fund. Investments in private funds are subject to the terms of the private funds’ offering documents. Valuations of the private funds may be subject to estimates and are net of management, performance incentive fees or allocations payable to the private funds’ managers as required by the private funds’ offering documents. The Valuation Designee may establish a systematic fair valuation process for days that the private funds do not provide a value.
46
If market quotations for a security are not readily available or if the Adviser believes that market quotations do not accurately reflect fair value of a security, that security will be valued at its fair value as determined in good faith by the Adviser or through the use of a pricing service under procedures established and periodically reviewed by and under the ultimate supervision of the Board. A fair value determination may be required if, for example, (1) only a bid price or an asked price is available, (2) the spread between bid and asked prices is substantial, (3) there is a suspension or limitation of trading, or (4) events or actions affecting the market prices of portfolio securities occur after the close of the relevant market. Determining the fair value of portfolio securities involves reliance on judgment, and a security’s fair value may be affected by the method used for determining value. There can be no assurance that a Fund could purchase or sell a portfolio security at the price used to calculate the Fund’s NAV. Because of the inherent uncertainty in making fair value determinations and the various factors considered in determining fair value, there can be significant deviations between the fair value at which a portfolio security is being carried and the price at which it is purchased or sold.
Foreign securities in which a Fund invests may be traded in markets that close before the time that the Fund calculates its NAV. In addition, certain foreign securities in which the Fund invests may be listed on foreign exchanges that trade on weekends or other days when a Fund does not calculate its NAV. In these situations, the value of the Fund’s holdings may change on days when shareholders are not able to purchase or redeem the Fund’s shares. The Board has authorized the Funds to retain a pricing service to determine the value of their portfolio securities, including the determination of the fair value of securities in situations when the value of such securities has been materially affected by events occurring before a Fund’s pricing time but after the close of the primary markets or exchanges on which such foreign securities are traded. These intervening events might be country-specific (e.g., natural disaster, economic or political developments, interest-rate change), issuer-specific (e.g., earnings report, merger announcement), or U.S. market-specific (e.g., a significant movement in the U.S. markets that is deemed to affect the value of foreign securities). The pricing service uses an automated system incorporating a model based on multiple parameters, including a security’s local closing price; relevant general and sector indices; currency fluctuations; trading in depository receipts and futures, if applicable; and research valuations by its staff, in determining what it believes is the fair value of the securities. To the extent that a Fund has significant holdings of foreign securities, fair valuation may be used by the Fund more frequently than is the case for other mutual funds.
PURCHASING SHARES
Advisor Shares of the Equity Allocation Fund and shares of Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund are available to investment management clients of the Adviser, charitable organizations that the Adviser’s clients wish to designate as recipients of shares, the Adviser’s employees (including their spouse, domestic partner, parents, siblings, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, parents-in-law, and siblings-in-law), current and former owners of the Adviser, members of the Adviser’s board, and members of the Board. You may purchase Institutional Shares of the Equity Allocation Fund directly from the Fund by contacting the Fund’s transfer agent or from financial intermediaries that make shares of the Fund available to their customers. You may purchase the Funds’ shares at the NAV per share next computed after receipt of your purchase order in proper form by the Funds’ transfer agent or a financial intermediary. An order is in proper form if it is complete and contains all required information. The Funds may modify or waive purchase eligibility requirements at any time.
The minimum initial investment in Institutional Shares of the Equity Allocation Fund is $100,000. There is no minimum initial investment for Advisor Shares of Equity Allocation Fund or shares of Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund, and there is no minimum subsequent investment amount for any Fund. The Funds may waive any minimum investment requirements in special circumstances and may modify or add a requirement at any time. The Funds reserve the right to reject any purchase order and may suspend the sale of shares at any time.
Shares of the Funds have not been registered for sale outside the U.S. The Funds generally do not sell shares to investors residing outside the U.S., even if they are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, except to investors with U.S. military APO or FPO addresses.
47
To comply with the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and the Funds’ Anti-Money-Laundering Program, you are required to provide certain information to the Funds when you purchase shares. You must supply your full name, date of birth, Social Security number, and permanent street address (and not a post office box) on your account application. You may, however, use a post office box as your mailing address. Please call 1-877-997-9971 if you need additional assistance when completing your account application. If we cannot obtain reasonable proof of your identity, the account may be rejected and you will not be allowed to purchase additional shares for your account until the necessary information is received. The Funds reserve the right to close any account after shares are purchased if clarifying information or documentation is requested but is not received.
ACH Purchases
You may purchase additional shares of the Funds through an ACH transfer of money from your checking or savings account. The ACH service will automatically debit your pre-designated bank account for the desired amount. Shares purchased using an ACH transfer will be issued at the NAV per share next computed after your order is received. For more information on this service, and required forms, please call 1-877-997-9971. When you pay for shares using an ACH transfer, the proceeds of a redemption of those shares may be delayed until the ACH transfer has been converted to federal funds, a process that may take up to eight days.
Purchase by Mail
You may also purchase shares of a Fund by sending a check made payable to the Fund together with a completed account application in the case of an initial investment, to:
Regular
Mail
P.O. Box 2175
Milwaukee, WI 53201-2175
Express/Overnight
Mail
Aspiriant Funds
c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc.
235 West Galena Street
Milwaukee, WI 53212
Subsequent investments made by check should be accompanied with the investment form (which will be enclosed with the confirmations and statements sent by the Fund). You may request a copy of your statement by calling 1-877-997-9971.
The Funds do not accept payment in cash or money orders. The Funds also do not accept third-party checks, Treasury checks, cashier’s checks, official checks, teller’s checks, credit card checks, traveler’s checks, or starter checks for the purchase of shares. The Funds are unable to accept post-dated checks, post-dated online bill-pay checks, or any conditional order or payment. In addition, undated checks, unsigned checks, and checks dated six months or more before their receipt by the transfer agent will be rejected. Checks for the purchase of shares of a Fund must be made payable to the Fund and be drawn on a bank located within the U.S. and payable in U.S. dollars. Always write your Fund account number on the check.
Requests for redemptions of shares recently purchased by check (but not the date as of which the redemption price is determined) will be returned to shareholder for future resubmission. This delay can be avoided if shares are purchased by wire and does not apply if there are sufficient other shares in your account to satisfy the requested redemption. The transfer agent will charge you a $25 fee for any returned check.
Purchase by Wire
You may purchase shares for initial investment or for subsequent investments by wiring federal funds. Please call the transfer agent at 1-877-997-9971 for instructions.
For Initial Investment by Wire
If you are making your first investment in a Fund, before you wire funds, the transfer agent must have received your completed account application. You can mail or overnight-deliver your account application to the transfer agent. Upon receipt of your account application, the transfer agent will establish an account for you. The wire from your bank must include the name of the Fund and your name and account number so that your wire can be correctly applied.
For Subsequent Investments by Wire
Before sending your wire, please call the transfer agent at 1-877-997-9971 to ensure prompt and accurate credit upon receipt of your wire. Wired funds must be received before the close of the NYSE, normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time, to be eligible for same-day pricing. The Funds and their agents are not responsible for the consequences of delays resulting from the banking or Federal Reserve wire system, or for incomplete wire instructions or errors in those instructions.
48
Purchase Through an Authorized Securities Dealer or Mutual Fund Marketplace
You may purchase shares of a Fund through any securities dealer or mutual fund marketplace that has been authorized by the Fund to make shares available. Authorized securities dealers may be authorized by a Fund to designate other intermediaries to receive purchase and redemption orders. An order to purchase shares is deemed received by a Fund when the authorized securities dealer (or, if applicable, its authorized designee) receives the order in such form as meets requirements established by the particular securities dealer or mutual fund marketplace, and shares will be issued at the NAV per share next determined after receipt of your order.
Your securities dealer, a mutual fund marketplace, or another financial organization may establish policies that differ from those of the Funds. For example, the organization may impose higher minimum investment requirements than are imposed by the Fund or may charge you a transaction fee or other fees, which may not be imposed by the Fund, in connection with purchases and redemptions of Fund shares.
Canceled or Failed Payments
The Funds accept checks and ACH transfers for the purchase of shares at full value, subject to collection. If you pay for shares with a check or ACH transfer that does not clear, your purchase will be canceled. You will be responsible for any resulting losses or expenses incurred by a Fund or the transfer agent and the Fund may redeem shares you own in the account to effect reimbursement. The Funds and their agents have the right to reject or cancel any purchase order because of nonpayment. In addition to any losses, you will be charged a $25 insufficient funds fee.
Frequent Trading Policy
The Funds are intended to serve as investment vehicles for long-term investors. Frequent trading or market timing, which the Funds generally define as redeeming shares within 90 days of their purchase, can disrupt a Fund’s investment program and create additional transaction costs that all remaining shareholders bear. Therefore, the Funds believe that it is not in their shareholders’ interests to accommodate frequent trading and have adopted policies and procedures designed to deter this practice.
For Institutional Shares of the Equity Allocation Fund, the Board has approved the imposition of a 2.00% redemption fee on shares that are redeemed within 90 days of purchasing such shares, with certain exceptions described below. The redemption fee is paid directly to the Equity Allocation Fund and is designed to offset brokerage commissions, market impact, and other costs associated with short-term trading.
In addition, a Fund may reject any purchase order that it regards as disruptive to efficient portfolio management. Investors whom a Fund identifies as engaging in abusive trading practices will be notified of the Fund’s adverse view of market timing and the Fund may terminate these relationships. In making such judgments, the Fund seeks to act in a manner it believes to be consistent with shareholders’ best interests. Although these efforts are designed to discourage abusive trading practices, these tools cannot eliminate the possibility that such activity will occur.
The Equity Allocation Fund relies primarily on the imposition of a redemption fee to deter market timers with respect to its Institutional Shares. Although imposition of this fee is intended to discourage abusive trading practices in shares of the Fund, there can be no assurance that such activity will not occur.
It is important to recognize that, because of the complexity involved in identifying abusive trading activity and the volume of shareholder transactions, there can be no assurance that the Funds’ efforts will identify all trades or trading practices that may be considered abusive. The Funds have entered into agreements with financial intermediaries obligating them to provide, upon request, information regarding their customers and their customers’ transactions in shares of the Funds. The Funds rely on financial intermediaries (other than the transfer agent) and information provided by financial intermediaries to monitor trades of shareholders whose shares are held in group or omnibus accounts by the financial intermediaries. The Funds will generally rely on the financial intermediaries to impose a redemption fee where applicable and to prohibit or bring to the attention of the Trust transactions that may be abusive. The Funds reserve the right to reject any order placed from an omnibus account, and, if it deems it appropriate because of a financial intermediary’s failure to comply with its responsibilities, a Fund may terminate the right of the financial intermediary to maintain an omnibus account.
49
REDEEMING SHARES
General
You may redeem shares of the Funds at any time. As described below, redemption requests may be made by mail or telephone through the transfer agent or may be made through an authorized financial intermediary or mutual fund marketplace. Your shares will be redeemed at their current NAV per share next computed after receipt of your redemption request in proper form. The value of the shares redeemed may be more or less than their original cost, depending on changes in a Fund’s NAV per share.
For Institutional Shares of Equity Allocation Fund, a redemption fee of 2.00% of the then-current value of the shares redeemed is imposed on redemptions of shares made within 90 days of purchase (i.e., the redemption is effective on or before the 90th day following the date of purchase), subject to certain exceptions. The fee does not apply to the redemption of shares that were purchased by reinvesting dividends or other distributions. It also does not apply to redemptions for which the shareholder or the shareholder’s agent notifies the transfer agent that the redemption is being made to make required distributions from an IRA (or other tax-deferred retirement account) or to redemptions following the death or disability of a shareholder. For purposes of determining whether the redemption fee applies, shares held for the longest time will be deemed to have been redeemed first.
The Funds normally make payment for all shares redeemed as soon as practicable, generally within two business days but no later than seven days after receipt by the transfer agent of a redemption request in proper form. If you purchase shares by check or ACH and submit shortly thereafter a redemption request, the redemption proceeds will not be transmitted to you until your purchase check or ACH transfer has cleared. This process may take up to eight days. Shareholders who redeem shares held in an IRA must indicate on their redemption request whether federal income taxes or any applicable state taxes should be withheld. If not, this type of redemption can be subject to federal income tax withholding and, possibly, state taxes. The Funds may suspend the right of redemption or postpone payment of redemption proceeds under unusual circumstances, as permitted by the Investment Company Act of 1940 Act (“1940 Act”) or by the SEC.
The Funds normally expect to use cash or cash equivalents to meet redemption requests. The Funds generally pay redemption proceeds in cash, however, under certain circumstances (e.g., when making a charitable contribution), the Funds may pay all or part of your redemption proceeds in liquid securities with a market value equal to the redemption price (redemption in kind). If your shares are redeemed in kind, you would have to pay transaction costs to sell the securities distributed to you, as well as taxes on any capital gains from the sale as with any redemption. In addition, you would continue to be subject to the risks of any market fluctuation in the value of the securities you receive in kind until they are sold.
Shares of the Funds may be redeemed by using one of the procedures described below. For additional information regarding redemption procedures, you may call 1-877-997-9971 or contact your securities dealer.
You may redeem shares by mailing a written request to:
Regular
Mail
P.O. Box 2175
Milwaukee, WI 53201-2175
Express/Overnight
Mail
Aspiriant Funds
c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc.
235 West Galena Street
Milwaukee, WI 53212
The proceeds of a written redemption request are normally paid by check made payable to the shareholders. You may request that redemption proceeds of $1,000 or more be wired to your account at any member bank of the Federal Reserve System if you have previously designated that account as one to which redemption proceeds may be wired. See “Telephone Redemption Requests.” A $20 fee will be deducted from your account if payment is made by federal funds wire transfer. This fee is subject to change. Depending on how quickly you wish to receive payment, you can request that payment be made by ACH transfer, without charges, if you have established this redemption option.
Medallion Signature Guarantees
The transfer agent has adopted standards and procedures pursuant to which medallion signature guarantees in proper form are generally accepted from domestic banks, brokers, dealers, credit unions, national securities exchanges, registered securities associations, clearing agencies, and savings associations, as well as from participants in the NYSE Medallion Signature Program and the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program (“STAMP”). A notary public is not an acceptable signature guarantor. A medallion signature guarantee of each owner is required to redeem shares in the following situations:
50
○ | If ownership changes on your account. |
○ | When redemption proceeds are sent to any person, address, or bank account not on record. |
○ | When establishing or modifying certain services on an account. |
○ | If the transfer agent received a change of address within the past 15 days. |
○ | For all redemptions in excess of $50,000 from any shareholder account. |
The transfer agent may also require a medallion signature guarantee in other instances it deems appropriate. If you have any questions about medallion signature guarantees, please call 1-877-997-9971.
Telephone Redemption Requests
You may redeem shares by telephone request if you have elected to have this option. To arrange for telephone redemptions after an account has been opened, or to change the bank account or address designated to receive redemption proceeds, please call 1-877-997-9971 to obtain the forms. The request must be signed by each account owner and may require a medallion signature guarantee. You may place a telephone redemption request of up to $50,000 by calling 1-877-997-9971. You may choose to have the redemption paid by check sent to your address of record, or by federal funds wire transfer (minimum amount of $1,000) or electronic ACH funds transfer to your pre-designated bank account. A $20 fee will be deducted from your account if payment is made by federal funds wire transfer. This fee is subject to change. There is no charge for proceeds sent by ACH transfer; however, you may not receive credit for transferred funds for two to three days.
By selecting the telephone redemption option, you authorize the transfer agent to act on telephone instructions reasonably believed to be genuine. The transfer agent employs reasonable procedures, such as requiring a form of personal identification, to confirm that telephone redemption instructions are genuine. Neither the Funds nor the transfer agent will be liable for any losses resulting from unauthorized or fraudulent instructions if these procedures are followed. The Funds reserve the right to refuse any request made by telephone, including requests made shortly after a change of address, and may limit the number of requests within a specified period. Once a telephone transaction has been placed, it cannot be canceled or modified.
Redemptions Through an Authorized Securities Dealer or Mutual Fund Marketplace
If you hold shares through a securities dealer or mutual fund marketplace, you may place your redemption request through that organization. Shares will be redeemed at the NAV per share next computed after your request is received in good order by the intermediary. Please keep in mind that an authorized securities dealer (or its designee) may charge you a transaction fee or other fees for processing a redemption of Fund shares.
Redemption of Small Accounts
To reduce Fund expenses, each Fund reserves the right to redeem at its option, upon not less than 30 days written notice, the account of any shareholder that has a value of less than $25,000 in the Fund as a result of one or more redemptions, if the shareholder does not purchase additional shares to increase the account value to at least $25,000 in the Fund during the notice period.
DISTRIBUTION OF FUND SHARES
Distribution Plan
Institutional Shares of the Equity Allocation Fund has in effect a plan under Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act that allows that share class to pay for the sale and distribution of shares in an annual amount equal to 0.25% of average daily net assets. Because these fees are paid out of the Equity Allocation Fund’s Institutional Shares’ assets on an ongoing basis, over time they will increase the cost of your investment and may cost you more than paying other types of sales charges.
Other Compensation to Intermediaries
From its own assets, the Adviser may make payments based on gross sales and current assets to selected brokerage firms or institutions. The amount of these payments may be substantial. The minimum aggregate sales required for eligibility for such payments, and the factors in selecting the brokerage firms and institutions to which they will be made, are determined from time to time by the Adviser. Furthermore, the Adviser may pay fees from its own assets to brokers, banks, financial advisers, retirement plan service providers and other financial intermediaries (i) for providing distribution-related or shareholder services, (ii) to compensate them for marketing expenses they incur, or (iii) to pay for the opportunity to have them distribute the Funds. The amount of these payments is determined by the Adviser and may differ among financial intermediaries. Such payments may provide incentives for financial intermediaries to make shares of the Funds available to their customers and may allow the Funds greater access to such financial intermediaries and their customers than would be the case if no payments were made. You may wish to consider whether such arrangements exist when evaluating any recommendation to purchase shares of the Funds.
51
SHAREHOLDER SERVICES PLAN
Institutional Shares of the Equity Allocation Fund has in effect a shareholder services plan permitting that share class to pay financial institutions that provide certain shareholder services to the Equity Allocation Fund’s Institutional Shares a shareholder services fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Equity Allocation Fund’s Institutional Shares attributable to the financial institution. The shareholder services may include (i) establishing and maintaining accounts and records relating to shareholders; (ii) processing dividend and distribution payments from the Equity Allocation Fund on behalf of shareholders; (iii) providing information periodically to shareholders showing their positions in shares and integrating such statements with those of other transactions and balances in shareholders’ other accounts serviced by such financial institution; (iv) arranging for bank wires; (v) responding to shareholder inquiries relating to the services performed; (vi) responding to routine inquiries from shareholders concerning their investments; (vii) providing sub-accounting with respect to shares beneficially owned by shareholders, or the information to the Equity Allocation Fund necessary for sub-accounting; (viii) if required by law, forwarding shareholder communications from the Equity Allocation Fund (such as proxies, shareholder reports, annual and semi-annual financial statements and dividend, distribution and tax notices) to shareholders; (ix) assisting in processing purchase, exchange and redemption requests from shareholders and in placing such orders with service contractors; (x) assisting shareholders in changing dividend options, account designations and addresses; (xi) providing shareholders with a service that invests the assets of their accounts in shares pursuant to specific or pre-authorized instructions; and (xii) providing such other similar services as the Equity Allocation Fund’s Institutional Shares or its shareholders may reasonably request to the extent the financial institution is permitted to do so under applicable statutes, rules and regulations.
DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Each Fund pays dividends from its net investment income and distributes any net capital gains that it realizes. Dividends are paid at least annually by the Equity Allocation Fund and Defensive Allocation Fund and quarterly by the Municipal Bond Fund and Taxable Bond Fund. Capital gain distributions are generally paid once a year. All dividends and other distributions will be reinvested in Fund shares unless a shareholder chooses either to (1) receive dividends in cash, while reinvesting capital gains distributions in additional Fund shares, or (2) receive all distributions in cash. Additionally, a Fund reports details of distribution related transactions on quarterly account statements. A Fund may also pay dividends and capital gain distributions at other times if necessary for the Fund to avoid U.S. federal income or excise tax.
TAX INFORMATION
You should always consult your tax advisor for specific guidance regarding the federal, state and local tax effects of your investment in the Funds. The following is a summary of certain important U.S. federal income tax consequences of investing in the Funds. This summary does not apply to shares held in an IRA or other tax-qualified plans, which are generally not subject to current tax. Transactions relating to shares held in such accounts may, however, be taxable at some time in the future.
Each Fund has elected and intends to qualify each year for treatment as a regulated investment company (a “RIC”) for federal income tax purposes, and the Funds, therefore, do not expect to be subject to federal income tax on their taxable income and gains that the Funds timely distribute to shareholders. Each Fund intends to distribute its net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, so that it will not be subject to a federal excise tax on certain undistributed amounts. However, a Fund’s failure to qualify as a RIC or to meet minimum distribution requirements would result (if certain relief provisions were not available) in fund-level taxation and, consequently, a reduction in income available for distribution to shareholders.
The Funds’ dividends and capital gains distributions are taxable to most investors (unless your investment is an unleveraged investment made in an IRA or other tax-advantaged account). The tax status of any dividend or distribution is generally the same regardless of how long you have been an investor in a Fund and regardless of whether you reinvest your dividends and distributions or take them as cash. Income distributions, including distributions of net short-term capital gains but excluding distributions of qualified dividend income, are generally taxable at ordinary income tax rates. Distributions reported by the Funds as long-term capital gains and as qualified dividend income are generally taxable at the rates applicable to long-term capital gains and currently set at a maximum tax rate for individuals at 20% (lower rates apply to individuals in lower tax brackets).
Dividends that are qualified dividend income are currently eligible for the reduced maximum rate to individuals of 20% (lower rates apply to individuals in lower tax brackets) to the extent that a Fund receives qualified dividend income and certain holding period requirements and other requirements are satisfied by you and by the Fund. Distributions that the Funds receive from an underlying fund taxable as a RIC or from a REIT will be treated as qualified dividend income only to the extent so designated by such underlying fund or REIT. Qualified dividend income is, in general, dividends from domestic corporations and from certain foreign corporations (e.g., foreign corporations incorporated in a possession of the United States or in certain countries with a comprehensive tax treaty with the United States, or the stock of which is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States). Certain of the Funds’ investment strategies will significantly limit their ability to make distributions eligible for the reduced tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income.
52
Corporate shareholders may be entitled to a dividends received deduction for the portion of dividends they receive from a Fund that are attributable to dividends received by the Fund from U.S. corporations, subject to certain limitations. Certain Funds’ investment strategies will significantly limit their ability to distribute dividends eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations.
For the Municipal Bond Fund to qualify to pay exempt-interest dividends, which are treated as items of interest excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, at least 50% of the value of the total assets of the Municipal Bond Fund must consist of obligations exempt from regular federal income tax as of the close of each quarter of the Municipal Bond Fund’s taxable year. If the proportion of taxable investments held by the Municipal Bond Fund exceeds 50% of the Municipal Bond Fund’s total assets as of the close of any quarter of any Fund taxable year, the Fund will not for that taxable year satisfy the general eligibility test that otherwise permits it to pay exempt-interest dividends. Distributions from the Municipal Bond Fund’s tax-exempt interest income, while exempt from regular federal income tax, may be subject to state or local income taxes. A portion of these dividends may be tax preference items for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to non-corporate shareholders. Since the Municipal Bond Fund invests primarily in sources that do not pay dividends, it is not expected that the distributions paid by the Municipal Bond Fund will qualify for either the dividends received deduction for corporations or any favorable U.S. federal income tax rate available to non-corporate shareholders on “qualified dividend income.” Additionally, the Municipal Bond Fund is not a preferable investment for IRAs, for other tax-exempt or tax-deferred accounts or for investors who are not sensitive to the federal income tax consequences of their investments.
If a Fund declares a dividend in October, November or December, payable to shareholders of record in such a month, and pays it in January of the following year, you will be treated as if you received it in the year in which it was declared.
A RIC that receives business interest income may pass through its net business interest income for purposes of the tax rules applicable to the interest expense limitations under Section 163(j) of the Code. A RIC’s total “Section 163(j) Interest Dividend” for a tax year is limited to the excess of the RIC’s business interest income over the sum of its business interest expense and its other deductions properly allocable to its business interest income. A RIC may, in its discretion, designate all or a portion of ordinary dividends as Section 163(j) Interest Dividends, which would allow the recipient shareholder to treat the designated portion of such dividends as interest income for purposes of determining such shareholder’s interest expense deduction limitation under Section 163(j) of the Code. This can potentially increase the amount of a shareholder’s interest expense deductible under Section 163(j) of the Code. In general, to be eligible to treat a Section 163(j) Interest Dividend as interest income, you must have held your shares in a Fund for more than 180 days during the 361-day period beginning on the date that is 180 days before the date on which the share becomes ex-dividend with respect to such dividend. Section 163(j) Interest Dividends, if so designated by a Fund, will be reported to your financial intermediary or otherwise in accordance with the requirements specified by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).
Sales and exchanges generally will be taxable transactions to shareholders. Assuming you hold your Fund shares as a capital asset, when you sell or exchange Fund shares you will generally recognize a capital gain or capital loss in an amount equal to the difference between the net amount of sale proceeds (or, in the case of an exchange, the fair market value of the shares) that you receive and your tax basis for the shares that you sell or exchange. For tax purposes, an exchange of Fund shares for shares of a different fund is the same as a sale. Any capital gain or loss realized upon a sale or exchange of Fund shares is generally treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than twelve months. Capital gain or loss realized upon a sale or exchange of Fund shares held for twelve months or less is generally treated as short-term capital gain or loss, except that any capital loss on the sale of Fund shares held for six months or less is treated as long-term capital loss to the extent that capital gain dividends were paid with respect to such Fund shares and disallowed to the extent that exempt interest dividends were paid with respect to such Fund shares. In certain circumstances, losses realized on the redemption or exchange of Fund shares may be disallowed.
The Funds (or their administrative agent) must report to the IRS and furnish to Fund shareholders the cost basis information for Fund shares purchased and sold. In addition to reporting the gross proceeds from the sale of Fund shares, each Fund (or its administrative agent) is also required to report the cost basis information for such shares and indicate whether these shares have a short-term or long-term holding period. For each sale of its shares, each Fund will permit its shareholders to elect from among several IRS-accepted cost basis methods, including the average cost basis method. In the absence of an election, each Fund will use the FIFO (first in, first out) method as the default cost basis method. The cost basis method elected by shareholders (or the cost basis method applied by default) for each sale of a Fund’s shares may not be changed after the settlement date of each such sale of a Fund’s shares. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the best IRS-accepted cost basis method for their tax situation and to obtain more information about cost basis reporting. Shareholders also should carefully review any cost basis information provided to them and make any additional basis, holding period or other adjustments that are required when reporting these amounts on their federal income tax returns.
53
U.S. individuals, estates and trusts with adjusted gross income exceeding $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly) subject to a 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income.” For these purposes, dividends (other than exempt-interest dividends), interest and certain capital gains are generally taken into account in computing a shareholder’s net investment income.
If you invest in a Fund shortly before a dividend or other distribution, generally you will pay a higher price per share and, unless you are exempt from tax, you will pay taxes on the amount of the distribution whether you reinvest the distribution in additional shares or receive it as cash. This is known as “buying a dividend” and generally should be avoided by taxable investors.
If you hold shares in a taxable account, each year you will be sent information regarding the tax status of any dividends and other distributions you receive from the Fund.
Federal law requires the Funds to withhold (as “backup withholding”) on dividends (including exempt-interest dividends) and other distributions, sale proceeds and any other payments that are subject to backup withholding paid to shareholders who fail to provide a Social Security number or taxpayer identification number or fail to make certifications required by the IRS. The backup withholding rate is 24%. Foreign shareholders may be subject to special withholding requirements.
To the extent a Fund invests in foreign securities, it may be subject to foreign withholding taxes with respect to dividends or interest the Fund received from sources in foreign countries. If more than 50% of the total assets of a Fund consists of foreign securities, such Fund will be eligible to elect to treat some of those taxes as a distribution to shareholders, which would allow shareholders to offset some of their U.S. federal income tax. Foreign tax credits, if any, received by a Fund as a result of an investment in underlying fund taxable as a RIC will not be passed through to you unless the Fund qualifies as a “qualified fund-of-funds” under the Code. A Fund will be treated as a “qualified fund-of-funds” under the Code if at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets (at the close of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year) is represented by interests in other funds taxable as RICs. A Fund (or its administrative agent) will notify you if it makes such an election and provide you with the information necessary to reflect foreign taxes paid on your income tax return.
The Equity Allocation Fund uses a tax management technique known as highest in, first out. Using this technique, the portfolio holdings that have experienced the smallest gain or largest loss are sold first in an effort to minimize capital gains and enhance after-tax returns.
Each Fund may invest in complex securities. These investments may be subject to numerous special and complex tax rules. These rules could affect the ability of a Fund to qualify as a RIC, affect whether gains and losses recognized by a Fund are treated as ordinary income or capital gain, accelerate the recognition of income to a Fund and/or defer a Fund’s ability to recognize losses. In turn, those rules may affect the amount, timing or character of the income distributed to you by a Fund.
The above discussion provides very general information only, and tax laws are subject to change. You should consult your tax professional about foreign, federal, state and local tax consequences associated with your investment in the Funds, including the potential application of the federal alternative minimum tax to you on the Municipal Bond Fund’s exempt-interest dividends and possible state and local income taxation of the Municipal Bond Fund’s exempt-interest dividends and other distributions. More information about taxes is available in the SAI.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights tables are intended to help you understand each Fund’s financial performance for the past five fiscal years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single share. The total returns in the tables represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in a Fund (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions). This information has been derived from the Funds’ financial statements and financial highlights, which have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, whose report, along with the Funds’ financial statements and financial highlights, is incorporated by reference into the SAI and included in the Trust's Form N-CSR, which is available upon request.
54
ASPIRIANT RISK-MANAGED EQUITY ALLOCATION FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS - ADVISOR SHARES
Per share income and capital changes for a share outstanding throughout each period.
Year
Ended March 31, 2025 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2024 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2023 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2022 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2021 |
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 15.58 | $ | 13.76 | $ | 14.58 | $ | 14.35 | $ | 11.30 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 1.13 | 2.37 | (0.75 | ) | 0.44 | 3.11 | ||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.33 | 2.59 | (0.53 | ) | 0.62 | 3.28 | ||||||||||||||
Less Distributions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (0.24 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.37 | ) | (0.10 | ) | ||||||||||
From net realized gain | (0.94 | ) | (0.30 | ) | (0.15 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.13 | ) | ||||||||||
Total distributions | (1.18 | ) | (0.77 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (0.39 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||
Net assets value, end of period | $ | 15.73 | $ | 15.58 | $ | 13.76 | $ | 14.58 | $ | 14.35 | ||||||||||
Total return | 8.63 | % | 19.29 | % | (3.58 | )% | 4.10 | % | 29.08 | % | ||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $ | 1,296,718 | $ | 1,391,732 | $ | 1,452,741 | $ | 1,729,996 | $ | 1,628,317 | ||||||||||
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses before expense waiver1 | 0.42 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.42 | % | ||||||||||
Expense waiver1 | (0.13 | )% | (0.14 | )% | (0.14 | )% | (0.14 | )% | (0.14 | )% | ||||||||||
Total expenses after expense waiver1 | 0.29 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 1.25 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.62 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.34 | % | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 19 | % | 15 | % | 36 | % | 24 | % | 47 | % |
1 | The ratios of expenses and net investment income or loss to average net assets do not reflect the Fund’s proportionate share of income and expenses of underlying companies in which the Fund invests. |
55
ASPIRIANT RISK-MANAGED MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Per share income and capital changes for a share outstanding throughout each period.
Year
Ended March 31, 2025 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2024 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2023 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2022 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2021 |
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 9.37 | $ | 9.32 | $ | 9.76 | $ | 10.46 | $ | 10.11 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (0.11 | ) | 0.02 | (0.35 | ) | (0.55 | ) | 0.51 | ||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.19 | 0.39 | (0.10 | ) | (0.29 | ) | 0.71 | |||||||||||||
Less Distributions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (0.34 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.33 | ) | (0.35 | ) | (0.36 | ) | ||||||||||
From net realized gain | — | — | (0.01 | ) | (0.06 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total distributions | (0.34 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.36 | ) | ||||||||||
Net assets value, end of period | $ | 9.22 | $ | 9.37 | $ | 9.32 | $ | 9.76 | $ | 10.46 | ||||||||||
Total return | 2.05 | % | 4.30 | % | (0.88 | )% | (2.87 | )% | 7.10 | % | ||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $ | 1,223,780 | $ | 1,232,755 | $ | 1,022,894 | $ | 1,140,093 | $ | 1,171,205 | ||||||||||
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses before expense waiver1 | 0.46 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.47 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.45 | % | ||||||||||
Expense waiver1 | (0.12 | )% | (0.13 | )% | (0.13 | )% | (0.13 | )% | (0.13 | )% | ||||||||||
Total expenses after expense waiver1 | 0.34 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 3.16 | % | 3.15 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.32 | % | 2.40 | % | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 23 | % | 21 | % | 49 | % | 11 | % | 16 | % |
1 | The ratios of expenses and net investment income or loss to average net assets do not reflect the Fund’s proportionate share of income and expenses of underlying companies in which the Fund invests. |
56
ASPIRIANT DEFENSIVE ALLOCATION FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Per share income and capital changes for a share outstanding throughout each period.
Year
Ended March 31, 2025 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2024 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2023 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2022 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2021 |
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 10.69 | $ | 10.08 | $ | 10.55 | $ | 10.87 | $ | 9.38 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.55 | 0.78 | (0.55 | ) | 0.04 | 1.59 | ||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.68 | 0.99 | (0.39 | ) | 0.25 | 1.74 | ||||||||||||||
Less Distributions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (0.49 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.57 | ) | (0.25 | ) | ||||||||||
From return of capital | — | — | — | (0.00 | )1 | — | ||||||||||||||
Total distributions | (0.49 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.57 | ) | (0.25 | ) | ||||||||||
Net assets value, end of period | $ | 10.88 | $ | 10.69 | $ | 10.08 | $ | 10.55 | $ | 10.87 | ||||||||||
Total return | 6.55 | % | 9.97 | % | (3.71 | )% | 2.27 | % | 18.52 | % | ||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $ | 971,616 | $ | 1,245,588 | $ | 1,339,519 | $ | 1,536,383 | $ | 1,444,928 | ||||||||||
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses before expense waiver2 | 0.27 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.27 | % | ||||||||||
Expense waiver2 | (0.08 | )% | (0.09 | )% | (0.09 | )% | (0.09 | )% | (0.09 | )% | ||||||||||
Total expenses after expense waiver2 | 0.19 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 1.93 | % | 2.35 | % | 1.84 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.36 | % | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 5 | % | 3 | % | 21 | % | 20 | % | 4 | % |
1 | Rounds to less than 0.005. |
2 | The ratios of expenses and net investment income or loss to average net assets do not reflect the Fund’s proportionate share of income and expenses of underlying companies in which the Fund invests. |
57
ASPIRIANT RISK-MANAGED TAXABLE BOND FUND
Financial Highlights
Per share income and capital changes for a share outstanding throughout each period.
Year
Ended March 31, 2025 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2024 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2023 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2022 |
Year
Ended March 31, 2021 |
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 8.49 | $ | 8.51 | $ | 9.27 | $ | 10.06 | $ | 10.13 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.25 | 0.26 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.08 | 0.01 | (0.77 | ) | (0.61 | ) | 0.21 | |||||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.49 | 0.43 | (0.37 | ) | (0.36 | ) | 0.47 | |||||||||||||
Less Distributions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (0.50 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.39 | ) | (0.22 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||
From net realized gain | — | — | (0.00 | )1 | (0.21 | ) | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total distributions | (0.50 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.39 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.54 | ) | ||||||||||
Net assets value, end of period | $ | 8.48 | $ | 8.49 | $ | 8.51 | $ | 9.27 | $ | 10.06 | ||||||||||
Total return | 5.91 | % | 5.15 | % | (3.89 | )% | (3.76 | )% | 4.58 | % | ||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $ | 283,467 | $ | 269,321 | $ | 196,549 | $ | 205,520 | $ | 213,549 | ||||||||||
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses before expense waiver2 | 0.50 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.56 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.50 | % | ||||||||||
Expense waiver2 | (0.23 | )% | (0.24 | )% | (0.24 | )% | (0.24 | )% | (0.24 | )% | ||||||||||
Total expenses after expense waiver2 | 0.27 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 4.75 | % | 5.03 | % | 4.60 | % | 2.52 | % | 2.35 | % | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 15 | % | 14 | % | 19 | % | 24 | % | 20 | % |
1 | Rounds to less than 0.005. |
2 | The ratios of expenses and net investment income or loss to average net assets do not reflect the Fund’s proportionate share of income and expenses of underlying companies in which the Fund invests. |
58
FOR MORE INFORMATION
For more information about the Funds, the following documents are available free upon request:
Statement of Additional Information
The SAI provides additional information about the Funds. The current SAI is on file with the SEC and is incorporated by reference into (and is legally a part of) this prospectus.
Annual/Semi-Annual Reports and Form N-CSR
Additional information about each Fund’s investments is available in the Funds’ annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders and in Form N-CSR. The annual report to shareholders contains a discussion of the market conditions and investment strategies that significantly affected the Funds’ performance during their most recently completed fiscal year. Form N-CSR contains the Funds’ annual and semi-annual financial statements.
TO OBTAIN INFORMATION
To obtain a free copy of the SAI, semi-annual or annual reports, and other information such as financial statements, or if you have questions about the Funds:
By Telephone | |
Call 1-877-997-9971. | |
By Mail | |
Regular Mail: | Express/Overnight Mail: |
P.O. Box 2175 | Aspiriant Funds |
Milwaukee, WI 53201-2175 | c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. |
235 West Galena Street | |
Milwaukee, WI 53212 | |
By Internet | |
Go to www.aspiriantfunds.com. |
From the SEC
Reports and other information about the Funds are available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and copies of this information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending an email to publicinfo@sec.gov.
Investment Company Act File Number 811-22648
ASPIRIANT TRUST
STATEMENT
OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
August 1, 2025
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund
Advisor Shares (Ticker RMEAX)
Institutional Shares (Ticker RMEIX)*
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund
(Ticker RMMBX)
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
(Ticker RMDFX)
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund
(Ticker RMTBX)
* | As of the date of this Statement of Additional Information, Institutional Shares are not available for purchase. |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (“Equity Allocation Fund”), Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund (“Municipal Bond Fund”), Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (“Defensive Allocation Fund”), and Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (“Taxable Bond Fund”) are series of Aspiriant Trust (the “Trust”), an open-end management investment company organized on November 22, 2011, as a statutory trust under the laws of the State of Delaware. Aspiriant, LLC (the “Adviser”) serves as the investment adviser to the Funds. For the Equity Allocation Fund, Aperio Group, LLC (“Aperio”) and Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC (“GMO”) serve as the sub-advisers for the quality strategy, and Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”) serves as the sub-adviser for the global quality growth strategy. Allspring Global Investments, LLC (“Allspring Investments”), MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields”), and Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Nuveen”), serve as the Municipal Bond Fund’s sub-advisers.
Information about the Funds is set forth in the prospectus dated August 1, 2025 (the “Prospectus”) and provides the information you should know before investing. This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is not a prospectus and contains information in addition to that set forth in the Prospectus. This SAI is intended to provide you with additional information regarding the activities and operations of the Funds and the Trust and it should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus. The Funds’ financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 are included in the Trust’s Form N-CSR, which has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and are incorporated by reference into this SAI. To obtain a copy of the Prospectus or the Funds’ financial statements, please call 1-877-997-9971, write to P.O. Box 2175, Milwaukee, WI 53201-2175, or visit www.aspiriantfunds.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INVESTMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES | 1 |
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS | 34 |
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS | 36 |
CODES OF ETHICS | 41 |
INVESTMENT ADVISER | 41 |
INVESTMENT SUB-ADVISERS | 43 |
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS | 44 |
PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITER AND OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS | 57 |
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE | 58 |
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION | 59 |
TAX INFORMATION | 60 |
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS AND BROKERAGE | 73 |
DISTRIBUTION OF FUND SHARES | 74 |
PROXY VOTING PROCEDURES | 75 |
GENERAL INFORMATION | 76 |
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS | 77 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 77 |
APPENDIX A | A-1 |
APPENDIX B | B-1 |
INVESTMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES
The information below supplements the principal investment strategies and associated risks of the Funds as described in the Prospectus and provides information about other investment strategies that may be used by the Funds. As used in this section, the term “Fund” includes the underlying funds in which a Fund invests (which, to a limited extent, may be held through a wholly-owned and controlled domestic subsidiary).
American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”)
The Equity Allocation Fund and Defensive Allocation Fund may invest in ADRs, which are receipts issued by a U.S. bank or trust company evidencing ownership of underlying securities issued by a foreign issuer. ADRs, in registered form, are designed for use in U.S. securities markets. In a “sponsored” ADR, the foreign issuer typically bears certain expenses of maintaining the ADR facility. “Unsponsored” ADRs may be created without the participation of the foreign issuer. Holders of unsponsored ADRs generally bear all the costs of the ADR facility. The bank or trust company depository of an unsponsored ADR may be under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications received from the foreign issuer or to pass through voting rights.
Asset-Backed Securities
The Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund may invest in asset-backed securities, which represent a participation in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of underlying assets such as debt securities, bank loans, motor vehicle installment sales contracts, installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, receivables from revolving credit (i.e., credit card) agreements, and other categories of receivables. These underlying assets are securitized through the use of trusts and special purpose entities. Payment of interest and repayment of principal on asset-backed securities may be largely dependent upon the cash flows generated by the underlying assets backing the securities and, in certain cases, may be supported by letters of credit, surety bonds, or other credit enhancements. The rate of principal payments on asset-backed securities is related to the rate of principal payments, including prepayments, on the underlying assets. The credit quality of asset-backed securities depends primarily on the quality of the underlying assets, the level of credit support, if any, provided for the securities, and the credit quality of the credit-support provider, if any. The value of asset-backed securities may be affected by the various factors described above and other factors, such as changes in interest rates, the availability of information concerning the pool and its structure, the creditworthiness of the servicing agent for the pool, the originator of the underlying assets, or the entities providing the credit enhancement.
Asset-backed securities are often subject to more rapid repayment than their stated maturity date would indicate, as a result of the pass-through of prepayments of principal on the underlying assets. Prepayments of principal by borrowers or foreclosure or other enforcement action by creditors shortens the term of the underlying assets. The occurrence of prepayments is a function of several factors, such as the level of interest rates, the general economic conditions, the location and age of the underlying obligations, and other social and demographic conditions. The Fund’s ability to maintain positions in asset-backed securities is affected by the reductions in the principal amount of the underlying assets because of prepayments. The Fund’s ability to reinvest prepayments of principal (as well as interest and other distributions and sale proceeds) at a comparable yield is subject to generally prevailing interest rates at that time. The value of asset-backed securities varies with changes in market interest rates generally and the differentials in yields among various kinds of U.S. government securities, mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities. In periods of rising interest rates, the rate of prepayment tends to decrease, thereby lengthening the average life of the underlying securities. Conversely, in periods of falling interest rates, the rate of prepayment tends to increase, thereby shortening the average life of such assets. Because prepayments of principal generally occur when interest rates are declining, an investor, such as the Fund, generally has to reinvest the proceeds of such prepayments at lower interest rates than those at which the assets were previously invested. Therefore, asset-backed securities have less potential for capital appreciation in periods of falling interest rates than other income-bearing securities of comparable maturity.
1
Because asset-backed securities generally do not have the benefit of a security interest in the underlying assets that is comparable to a mortgage, asset-backed securities present certain additional risks that are not present with mortgage-backed securities. For example, revolving credit receivables are generally unsecured and the debtors on such receivables are entitled to the protection of a number of state and federal consumer credit laws, many of which give debtors the right to set off certain amounts owed, thereby reducing the balance due. Automobile receivables generally are secured, but by automobiles rather than by real property. Most issuers of automobile receivables permit loan servicers to retain possession of the underlying assets. If the servicer of a pool of underlying assets sells them to another party, there is the risk that the purchaser could acquire an interest superior to that of holders of the asset-backed securities. In addition, because of the large number of vehicles involved in a typical issue of asset-backed securities and technical requirements under state law, the trustee for the holders of the automobile receivables may not have a proper security interest in the automobiles. Therefore, there is the possibility that recoveries on repossessed collateral may not be available to support payments on these securities. Asset-backed securities have been, and may continue to be, subject to greater liquidity risks because of the deterioration of worldwide economic and liquidity conditions that became acute in 2008. In addition, government actions and proposals that affect the terms of underlying home and consumer loans, thereby changing demand for products financed by those loans, as well as the inability of borrowers to refinance existing loans, have had and may continue to have a negative effect on the valuation and liquidity of asset-backed securities.
Convertible Securities
The Equity Allocation Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund may purchase convertible securities. These securities include convertible debt obligations and convertible preferred stock. A convertible security entitles the holder to exchange it for a fixed number of shares of common stock (or other equity security), usually at a fixed price within a specified period of time. Until conversion, the holder receives the interest paid on a convertible bond or the dividend preference of a preferred stock.
Convertible securities have an “investment value,” which is the theoretical value determined by the yield it provides in comparison with similar securities without the conversion feature. The investment value changes are based on prevailing interest rates and other factors. They also have a “conversion value,” which is the worth in market value if the security were exchanged for the underlying equity security. Conversion value fluctuates directly with the price of the underlying security. If conversion value is substantially below investment value, the price of the convertible security is governed principally by its investment value. If the conversion value is near or above investment value, the price of the convertible security generally will rise above investment value and may represent a premium over conversion value because of the combination of the convertible security’s right to interest (or dividend preference) and the possibility of capital appreciation from the conversion feature. A convertible security’s price, when price is influenced primarily by its conversion value, will generally yield less than a senior non-convertible security of comparable investment value. Convertible securities may be purchased at varying price levels above their investment values or conversion values. However, there is no assurance that any premium above investment value or conversion value will be recovered, because prices change, and, as a result, the ability to achieve capital appreciation through conversion may never occur.
2
Collateralized Debt Obligations
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) are a type of asset-backed security and include, among other things, collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other similarly structured securities. A CBO is a trust which may be backed by a diversified pool of high risk, below investment grade fixed income securities. A CLO is a trust typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. The cash flows from the CDO trust are generally split into two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. Senior tranches are paid from the cash flows from the underlying assets before the junior tranches and equity or “first loss” tranches. Losses are first borne by the equity tranches, next by the junior tranches, and finally by the senior tranches. Senior tranches pay the lowest interest rates but are generally safer investments than more junior tranches because, should there be any default, senior tranches are typically paid first. The most junior tranches, such as equity tranches, would attract the highest interest rates but suffer the highest risk of loss should the holder of an underlying loan default. If some loans default and the cash collected by the CDO is insufficient to pay all of its investors, those in the lowest, most junior tranches suffer losses first. Since it is partially protected from defaults, a senior tranche from a CDO trust typically has higher ratings and lower yields than the underlying securities, and can be rated investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, more senior CDO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults and aversion to CDO securities as a class.
The risks of an investment in a CDO depend largely on the quality and type of the collateral and the tranche of the CDO in which the Fund invest. Normally, CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs are privately offered and sold, and thus are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in CDOs may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market, or other relevant measures of liquidity, may exist for CDOs allowing a CDO potentially to be deemed liquid by the Adviser under the Trust’s liquidity risk management program. In addition to the risks associated with debt instruments (e.g., interest rate risk and credit risk), CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the possibility that the Fund may invest in CDOs that are subordinate to other classes; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results.
Corporate Debt and Other Obligations
The Funds may invest in corporate debt securities, variable and floating rate debt securities and corporate commercial paper in the rating categories described above. Floating rate securities normally have a rate of interest that is set as a specific percentage of a designated base rate, such as the rate on Treasury bonds or bills or the prime rate at a major commercial bank. The interest rate on floating rate securities changes periodically when there is a change in the designated base rate. Variable rate securities provide for a specified periodic adjustment in the interest rate based on prevailing market rates.
The Funds may invest in corporate debt securities with contractual call provisions that permit the seller of the security to repurchase the security at a pre-determined price. The market price typically reflects the presence of a call provision.
The Funds may invest in structured debentures and structured notes. These are hybrid instruments with characteristics of both bonds and swap agreements. Like a bond, these securities make regular coupon payments and generally have fixed principal amounts. However, the coupon payments are typically tied to a swap agreement that can be affected by changes in a variety of factors such as exchange rates, the shape of the yield curve and foreign interest rates. Because of these factors, structured debentures and structured notes can display price behavior that is more volatile than and often not correlated to other fixed-income securities.
3
The Funds may also invest in inverse floaters and tiered index bonds. An inverse floater is a type of derivative that bears a floating or variable interest rate that moves in the opposite direction to the interest rate on another security or index level. Changes in the interest rate of the other security or index inversely affect the residual interest rate paid on the inverse floater, with the result that the inverse floater’s price will be considerably more volatile than that of a fixed-rate bond. Tiered index bonds are also a type of derivative instrument. The interest rate on a tiered index bond is tied to a specified index or market rate. So long as this index or market rate is below a predetermined “strike” rate, the interest rate on the tiered index bond remains fixed. If, however, the specified index or market rate rises above the “strike” rate, the interest rate on the tiered index bond will decrease. In general, the interest rates on tiered index bonds and inverse floaters move in the opposite direction of prevailing interest rates. The market for inverse floaters and tiered index bonds is relatively new. These corporate debt obligations may have characteristics similar to those of mortgage-related securities, but corporate debt obligations, unlike mortgage-related securities, are not subject to prepayment risk other than through contractual call provisions that generally impose a penalty for prepayment.
The Funds’ investments in U.S. dollar or foreign currency-denominated corporate debt securities of domestic or foreign issuers are limited to corporate debt securities (corporate bonds, debentures, notes or other similar corporate debt instruments) which meet the minimum ratings criteria set forth for the Funds, or, if unrated, which are in the Adviser’s opinion comparable in quality to corporate debt securities in which the Funds may invest. These criteria are described in the Prospectus. The rate of return or return of principal on some debt obligations may be linked or indexed to the level of exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and a foreign currency or currencies.
Cyber Security
Investment companies, such as the Funds, and their service providers may be prone to operational and information security risks resulting from cyber attacks. Cyber attacks include, among other behaviors, stealing or corrupting data maintained online or digitally, denial of service attacks on websites, the unauthorized release of confidential information, or various other forms of cyber security breaches. Cyber attacks affecting the Funds or the Adviser, sub- advisers, custodian, transfer agent, intermediaries, and other third-party service providers may adversely impact the Funds. For instance, cyber attacks may interfere with the processing of shareholder transactions, impact the Funds’ ability to calculate their net asset value, cause the release of private shareholder information or confidential company information, impede trading, subject the Funds to regulatory fines or financial losses, and cause reputational damage. The Funds may also incur additional costs for cyber security risk management purposes. Similar types of cyber security risks are also present for issuers of securities in which the Funds invest, which could result in material adverse consequences for such issuers, and may cause the Funds’ investments in such portfolio companies to lose value.
Derivatives
The Funds may use derivative instruments subject to the limitations described below. Generally, a derivative is a financial contract, the value of which depends upon, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate or index. Derivatives generally take the form of contracts under which the parties agree to payments between them based upon the performance of a wide variety of underlying references, such as stocks, bonds, loans, commodities, interest rates, currency exchange rates, and various domestic and foreign indices.
4
Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act (the “Derivatives Rule”) provides a comprehensive framework for the Funds’ use of derivatives. The Derivatives Rule requires registered investment companies that enter into derivatives transactions and certain other transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations to, among other things, (i) comply with a value-at-risk (“VaR”) leverage limit, and (ii) adopt and implement a comprehensive written derivatives risk management program. These and other requirements apply unless a Fund qualifies as a “limited derivatives user,” which the Derivatives Rule defines as a fund that limits its derivatives exposure to 10% of its net assets. Complying with the Derivatives Rule may increase the cost of a Fund’s investments and cost of doing business, which could adversely affect investors. Each Fund intends to qualify as a limited derivatives user under the Derivatives Rule. The Derivatives Rule may not be effective to limit a Fund’s risk of loss. In particular, measurements of VaR rely on historical data and may not accurately measure the degree of risk reflected in a Fund’s investment in derivatives.
A Fund may use derivatives for a variety of reasons, including as a substitute for investing directly in securities, as part of a hedging strategy (that is, for the purpose of reducing risk to the Fund), to manage the effective duration of the Fund’s portfolio, or for other purposes related to the management of the Fund. Derivatives permit the Fund to increase or decrease the level of risk, or change the character of the risk, to which its portfolio is exposed in much the same way as the Fund can increase or decrease the level of risk, or change the character of the risk, of its portfolio by making investments in specific securities. However, derivatives may entail investment exposures that are greater than their cost would suggest. As a result, a small investment in derivatives could have a large impact on the Fund’s performance.
A Fund will not make any hedging investment (whether an initial premium or deposit or a subsequent deposit) other than as necessary to close a prior investment if, immediately after such investment, the sum of the amount of its premiums and deposits, with respect to all currently effective hedging investments, would exceed 5% of its net assets. The Fund will invest in these instruments only in markets believed by the Adviser or sub-adviser to be active and sufficiently liquid.
While transactions in some derivatives may be effected on established exchanges, many other derivatives are privately negotiated and entered into in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market with a single counterparty. When exchange-traded derivatives are purchased and sold, a clearing agency associated with the exchange stands between each buyer and seller and effectively guarantees performance of each contract, either on a limited basis through a guaranty fund or to the full extent of the clearing agency’s balance sheet. Transactions in OTC derivatives not subject to a clearing requirement have no such protection. Each party to an uncleared OTC derivative bears the risk that its direct counterparty will default. In addition, OTC derivatives are generally less liquid than exchange traded derivatives because they often can only be closed out with the other party to the transaction.
The use of derivative instruments is subject to applicable regulations of the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), various state regulatory authorities and, with respect to exchange-traded derivatives, the several exchanges upon which they are traded. In addition, the Fund’s ability to use derivative instruments may be limited by tax considerations.
The particular derivative instruments the Fund can use are described below. There is no assurance that any derivatives strategy used by the Fund will succeed. The Fund may employ new derivative instruments and strategies when they are developed, if those investment methods are consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and are permissible under applicable regulations governing the Fund.
Options Transactions
Options on Interest Rates and Indices. A Fund may purchase put and call options on interest rates and on bond or equity indices. An option on interest rates or on an index gives the holder the right to receive, upon exercise of the option, an amount of cash if the closing value of the underlying interest rate or index is greater than, in the case of a call, or less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option. This amount of cash is equal to the difference between the exercise-settlement value of the interest rate option or the closing price of the index and the exercise price of the option expressed in dollars times a specified multiple (the “multiplier”). The writer of the option is obligated, for the premium received, to make delivery of this amount. Settlements for interest rate and index options are always in cash.
5
Expiration or Exercise of Options. If an option purchased by a Fund expires unexercised, the Fund realizes a capital loss equal to the premium paid. Prior to the earlier of exercise or expiration, an exchange traded option may be closed out by an offsetting purchase or sale of an option of the same series (type, exchange, underlying security, or index, exercise price, and expiration). There can be no assurance, however, that a closing purchase or sale transaction can be effected when the Fund desires.
The Fund may sell put or call options it has previously purchased, which could result in a net gain or loss depending on whether the amount realized on the sale is more or less than the premium and other transaction costs paid on the put or call option which is sold. Prior to exercise or expiration, an option may be closed out by an offsetting purchase or sale of an option of the same series. The Fund will realize a capital gain from a closing purchase transaction if the cost of the closing option is less than the premium received from writing the option, or, if it is more, the Fund will realize a capital loss. If the premium received from a closing sale transaction is more than the premium paid to purchase the option, the Fund will realize a capital gain or, if it is less, the Fund will realize a capital loss. The principal factors affecting the market value of a put or a call option include supply and demand, interest rates, the current market price of the underlying security or index in relation to the exercise price of the option, the volatility of the underlying security or index, and the time remaining until the expiration date.
Futures
A Fund may engage in futures transactions. The Fund may buy and sell futures contracts that relate to (1) interest rates, (2) debt securities, and (3) bond or equity indices. The Fund may only enter into futures contracts which are standardized and traded on a U.S. or foreign exchange, board of trade or similar entity, or quoted on an automated quotation system.
A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a security, index or interest rate (each a “financial instrument”) for a set price on a future date. Certain futures contracts, such as futures contracts relating to individual securities, call for making or taking delivery of the underlying financial instrument. However, these contracts generally are closed out before delivery by entering into an offsetting purchase or sale of a matching futures contract. Other futures contracts, such as futures contracts on indices, do not call for making or taking delivery of the underlying financial instrument, but rather are agreements pursuant to which two parties agree to take or make delivery of an amount of cash equal to the difference between the value of the financial instrument at the close of the last trading day of the contract and the price at which the contract was originally written. These contracts also may be settled by entering into an offsetting futures contract.
Unlike when the Fund purchases or sells a security, no price is paid or received by the Fund upon the purchase or sale of a futures contract. Initially, the Fund will be required to deposit with its futures broker (also known as a futures commission merchant (“FCM”) an amount of cash or securities equal to a specified percentage of the contract amount. This amount is known as initial margin. The margin deposit is intended to ensure completion of the contract. Minimum initial margin requirements are established by the futures exchanges and may be revised. In addition, FCMs may establish margin deposit requirements that are higher than the exchange minimums. Cash held as margin is generally invested by the FCM in high-quality instruments permitted under CFTC regulations, with returns retained by the FCM and interest paid to the Fund on the cash at an agreed-upon rate. The Fund will also receive any interest paid from coupon-bearing securities, such as Treasury securities, held in margin accounts. Subsequent payments to and from the FCM, called variation margin, will be made on a daily basis as the price of the underlying financial instrument fluctuates, making the futures contract more or less valuable, a process known as marking the contract to market. Changes in variation margin are recorded by the Fund as unrealized gains or losses. At any time prior to expiration of the futures contract, the Fund may elect to close the position by taking an opposite position that will operate to terminate its position in the futures contract. A final determination of variation margin is then made, additional cash is required to be paid by or released to the Fund, and the Fund realizes a gain or loss. In the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of an FCM that holds margin on behalf of the Fund, the Fund may be entitled to the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the FCM’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund. Futures transactions also involve brokerage costs.
6
Most U.S. futures exchanges limit the amount of fluctuation permitted in futures contract prices during a single trading day. The daily limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price at the end of a trading session. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular type of futures contract, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. The daily limit governs only price movement during a particular trading day and therefore does not limit potential losses, because the limit may prevent the liquidation of unfavorable positions. Futures contract prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing prompt liquidation of futures positions and subjecting some futures traders to substantial losses.
Options on Futures
A Fund may also purchase or write put and call options on the futures contracts in which it invests and may write straddles, which consist of a call and put option on the same futures contract. A futures option gives the holder the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a long position (call) or short position (put) in a futures contract at a specified exercise price prior to the expiration of the option. Upon exercise of a call option, the holder acquires a long position in the futures contract and the writer is assigned the opposite short position. In the case of a put option, the opposite is true. Prior to exercise or expiration, a futures option may be closed out by an offsetting purchase or sale of a futures option of the same series.
A Fund may use options on futures contracts in connection with hedging strategies. The writing of a call option or the purchasing of a put option on a futures contract constitutes a partial hedge against declining prices of the securities which are deliverable upon exercise of the futures contract. If the futures price at expiration of a written call option is below the exercise price, the Fund will retain the full amount of the option premium which provides a partial hedge against any decline that may have occurred in the Fund’s holdings of securities. If the futures price when the option is exercised is above the exercise price, however, the Fund will incur a loss, which may be offset, in whole or in part, by the increase in the value of the securities held by the Fund that were being hedged. Writing a put option or purchasing a call option on a futures contract serves as a partial hedge against an increase in the value of the securities the Fund intends to acquire.
As with investments in futures contracts, the Fund is required to deposit and maintain margin with respect to put and call options on futures contracts written by it.
7
Swap Transactions
A Fund may enter into interest rate, total return, and credit default swap agreements and interest rate caps, floors and collars. The Fund may also enter into options on the foregoing types of swap agreements (“swap options”).
The Fund may enter into swap transactions for any purpose consistent with its investment objectives and strategies, such as for the purpose of attempting to obtain or preserve a particular return or spread at a lower cost than obtaining a return or spread through purchases and/or sales of instruments in other markets, to protect against currency fluctuations, as a duration management technique, to protect against an increase in the price of securities the Fund anticipates purchasing at a later date, to reduce risk arising from the ownership of a particular instrument, or to gain exposure to certain securities, reference rates, sectors or markets.
Swap agreements are two party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for a specified period of time. In a standard swap transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on a particular predetermined asset, reference rate or index. The gross returns to be exchanged or swapped between the parties are generally calculated with respect to a notional amount (e.g., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate or in a basket of securities representing a particular index). The notional amount of the swap agreement generally is only used as a basis upon which to calculate the obligations that the parties to the swap agreement have agreed to exchange. The Fund’s current obligations under a net swap agreement will be accrued daily (offset against any amounts owed to the Fund) and the Fund will segregate assets determined to be liquid by the Adviser or sub-advisers for any accrued but unpaid net amounts owed to a swap counterparty.
Interest Rate Swaps. Interest rate swaps are financial instruments that involve the exchange of one type of interest rate for another type of interest rate cash flow on specified dates in the future. Some of the different types of interest rate swaps are “fixed-for floating rate swaps,” “termed basis swaps” and “index amortizing swaps.” Fixed-for floating rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed interest rate cash flows for floating rate cash flows. Termed basis swaps entail cash flows to both parties based on floating interest rates, where the interest rate indices are different. Index amortizing swaps are typically fixed-for floating swaps where the notional amount changes if certain conditions are met. Like a traditional investment in a debt security, the Fund could lose money by investing in an interest rate swap if interest rates change adversely.
Total Return Swaps. In a total return swap, one party agrees to pay the other the “total return” of a defined underlying asset during a specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate or the total return from other underlying assets. A total return swap may be applied to any underlying asset but is most commonly used with equity indices, single stocks, bonds and defined baskets of loans and mortgages. The Fund might enter into a total return swap involving an underlying index or basket of securities to create exposure to a potentially widely-diversified range of securities in a single trade. An index total return swap can be used by the portfolio managers to assume risk, without the complications of buying the component securities from what may not always be the most liquid of markets.
Credit Default Swaps. A credit default swap is a bilateral contract that enables an investor to buy or sell protection against a defined-issuer credit event. The Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements either as a buyer or a seller. The Fund may buy protection to attempt to mitigate the risk of default or credit quality deterioration in one or more of its individual holdings or in a segment of the fixed income securities market to which it has exposure, or to take a “short” position in individual bonds or market segments which it does not own. The Fund may sell protection in an attempt to gain exposure to the credit quality characteristics of particular bonds or market segments without investing directly in those bonds or market segments.
8
As the buyer of protection in a credit default swap, the Fund will pay a premium (by means of an upfront payment or a periodic stream of payments over the term of the agreement) in return for the right to deliver a referenced bond or group of bonds to the protection seller and receive the full notional or par value (or other agreed upon value) upon a default (or similar event) by the issuer(s) of the underlying referenced obligation(s). If no default occurs, the protection seller would keep the stream of payments and would have no further obligation to the Fund. Thus, the cost to the Fund would be the premium paid with respect to the agreement. If a credit event occurs, however, the Fund may elect to receive the full notional value of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity that may have little or no value. The Fund bears the risk that the protection seller may fail to satisfy its payment obligations.
If the Fund is a seller of protection in a credit default swap and no credit event occurs, the Fund would generally receive an up-front payment or a periodic stream of payments over the term of the swap. If a credit event occurs, however, generally the Fund would have to pay the buyer the full notional value of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity that may have little or no value. As the protection seller, the Fund effectively adds economic leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to being subject to investment exposure on its total net assets, the Fund is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. Thus, the Fund bears the same risk as it would by buying the reference obligations directly, plus the additional risks related to obtaining investment exposure through a derivative instrument discussed below under “Risks Associated with Swap Transactions.”
Caps, Collars and Floors. Caps and floors have an effect similar to buying or writing options. In a typical cap or floor agreement, one party agrees to make payments only under specified circumstances, usually in return for payment of a fee by the other party. For example, the buyer of an interest rate cap obtains the right to receive payments to the extent that a specified interest rate exceeds an agreed-upon level. The seller of an interest rate floor is obligated to make payments to the extent that a specified interest rate falls below an agreed-upon level. An interest rate collar involves selling a cap and purchasing a floor or vice versa to protect the Fund against interest rate movements exceeding given minimum or maximum levels.
Swap Options. A swap option is a contract that gives a counterparty the right (but not the obligation), in return for payment of a premium, to enter into a new swap agreement or to shorten, extend, cancel, or otherwise modify an existing swap agreement at some designated future time on specified terms. A cash-settled option on a swap gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to receive an amount of cash equal to the value of the underlying swap as of the exercise date. The Fund may write (sell) and purchase put and call swap options. Depending on the terms of the particular option agreement, the Fund generally will incur a greater degree of risk when it writes a swap option than when it purchases a swap option. When the Fund purchases a swap option, it risks losing only the amount of the premium it has paid should it decide to let the option expire unexercised. However, when the Fund writes a swap option, upon exercise of the option the Fund will become obligated according to the terms of the underlying agreement.
Risks Associated with Swap Transactions. The use of swap transactions is a highly specialized activity which involves strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio security transactions. If the Adviser or sub-advisers are incorrect in their forecasts of default risks, market spreads or other applicable factors the investment performance of the Fund would diminish compared with what it would have been if these techniques were not used. As the protection seller in a credit default swap, the Fund effectively adds economic leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to being subject to investment exposure on its total net assets, the Fund is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The Fund may only close out a swap, cap, floor, collar or other two-party contract with its particular counterparty, and may only transfer a position with the consent of that counterparty. In addition, the price at which the Fund may close out such a two party contract may not correlate with the price change in the underlying reference asset. If the counterparty defaults, the Fund will have contractual remedies, but there can be no assurance that the counterparty will be able to meet its contractual obligations or that the Fund will succeed in enforcing its rights. It also is possible that developments in the derivatives market, including potential government regulation, could adversely affect the Fund’s ability to terminate existing swap or other agreements or to realize amounts to be received under such agreements.
9
Limitations on the Use of CFTC-Regulated Futures, Options on Futures, and Swaps
A Fund will limit its direct investments in CFTC-regulated futures, options on futures and swaps (“CFTC Derivatives”) to the extent necessary for the Adviser to claim the exclusion from regulation as a commodity pool operator with respect to the Fund under CFTC Rule 4.5, as such rule may be amended from time to time. Under Rule 4.5 as currently in effect, the Fund will limit its trading activity in CFTC Derivatives (excluding activity for “bona fide hedging purposes,” as defined by the CFTC) such that it meets one of the following tests:
● | Aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish its positions in CFTC Derivatives do not exceed 5% of the liquidation value of the Fund’s portfolio, after taking into account unrealized profits and losses on such positions; or |
● | Aggregate net notional value of its positions in CFTC Derivatives does not exceed 100% of the liquidation value of the Fund’s portfolio, after taking into account unrealized profits and losses on such positions. |
With respect to each Fund, the Adviser has filed a notice of eligibility for exclusion from the definition of the term commodity pool operator under the Commodity Exchange Act and, therefore, is not subject to registration or regulation as a commodity pool operator thereunder.
The requirements for qualification as a regulated investment company may also limit the extent to which a Fund may invest in CFTC Derivatives.
Risks and Special Considerations Concerning Derivatives
The use of derivative instruments involves certain general risks and considerations, as well as specific risks pertaining to certain types of derivative instruments, as described below.
(1) | Market Risk. Market risk is the risk that the value of the underlying assets may go up or down. Adverse movements in the value of an underlying asset can expose the Fund to losses. The successful use of derivative instruments depends upon a variety of factors, particularly the portfolio managers’ ability to predict movements in the relevant markets, which may require different skills than predicting changes in the prices of individual securities. There can be no assurance that any particular strategy adopted will succeed. |
(2) | Counterparty Risk. Counterparty risk is the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of the failure of a counterparty to comply with the terms of a derivative instrument. The counterparty risk for exchange-traded derivatives is generally less than for OTC derivatives, since generally a clearing agency, which is the issuer or counterparty to each exchange-traded instrument, provides a guarantee of performance. For many OTC instruments, there is no similar clearing agency guarantee. In all transactions, the Fund will bear the risk that the counterparty will default, and this could result in a loss of the expected benefit of the derivative transactions and possibly other losses to the Fund. The Fund will enter into derivatives transactions only with counterparties that its portfolio manager reasonably believes are capable of performing under the contract. |
10
(3) | Correlation Risk. Correlation risk is the risk that there might be an imperfect correlation, or even no correlation, between price movements of a derivative instrument and price movements of investments being hedged. When a derivative transaction is used to completely hedge another position, changes in the market value of the combined position (the derivative instrument plus the position being hedged) result from an imperfect correlation between the price movements of the two instruments. With a perfect hedge, the value of the combined position remains unchanged with any change in the price of the underlying asset. With an imperfect hedge, the value of the derivative instrument and its hedge are not perfectly correlated. For example, if the value of a derivative instrument used in a short hedge (such as writing a call option, buying a put option or selling a futures contract) increased by less than the decline in value of the hedged investments, the hedge would not be perfectly correlated. This might occur due to factors unrelated to the value of the investments being hedged, such as speculative or other pressures on the markets in which these instruments are traded. The effectiveness of hedges using instruments on indices will depend, in part, on the degree of correlation between price movements in the index and the price movements in the investments being hedged. |
(4) | Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk that a derivative instrument cannot be sold, closed out, or replaced quickly at or very close to its fundamental value. Generally, exchange contracts are very liquid because the exchange clearinghouse is the counterparty of every contract. OTC transactions are less liquid than exchange-traded derivatives since they often can only be closed out with the other party to the transaction. The Fund might be required by applicable regulatory requirements to maintain assets as “cover,” maintain segregated accounts, and/or make margin payments when it takes positions in derivative instruments involving obligations to third parties (i.e., instruments other than purchase options). If the Fund is unable to close out its positions in such instruments, it might be required to continue to maintain such assets or accounts or make such payments until the position expires, matures or is closed out. These requirements might impair the Fund’s ability to sell a security or make an investment at a time when it would otherwise be favorable to do so, or require that the Fund sell a portfolio security at a disadvantageous time. The Fund’s ability to sell or close out a position in an instrument prior to expiration or maturity depends upon the existence of a liquid secondary market or, in the absence of such a market, the ability and willingness of the counterparty to enter into a transaction closing out the position. There is no assurance that any derivatives position can be sold or closed out at a time and price that is favorable to the Fund. |
(5) | Legal Risk. Legal risk is the risk of loss caused by the unenforceability of a party’s obligations under the derivative. While a party seeking price certainty agrees to surrender the potential upside in exchange for downside protection, the party taking the risk is looking for a positive payoff. Despite this voluntary assumption of risk, a counterparty that has lost money in a derivative transaction may try to avoid payment by exploiting various legal uncertainties about certain derivative products. |
(6) | Systemic or “Interconnection” Risk. Systemic or interconnection risk is the risk that a disruption in the financial markets will cause difficulties for all market participants. In other words, a disruption in one market will spill over into other markets, perhaps creating a chain reaction. Much of the OTC derivatives market takes place among the OTC dealers themselves, thus creating a large interconnected web of financial obligations. This interconnectedness raises the possibility that a default by one large dealer could create losses for other dealers and destabilize the entire market for OTC derivative instruments. |
11
(7) | Leverage Risk. Leverage risk is the risk that the Fund may be more volatile than if it had not been leveraged due to leverage’s tendency to exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund’s portfolio securities. The use of leverage may also cause the Fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it may not be advantageous to do so to satisfy its obligations. |
(8) | Regulatory Risk. The Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) has initiated a dramatic revision of the U.S. financial regulatory framework and covers a broad range of topics, including (among many others) a reorganization of federal financial regulators; a process intended to improve financial systemic stability and the resolution of potentially insolvent financial firms; and new rules for derivatives trading. Instruments in which the Fund may invest, or the issuers of such instruments, may be affected by the new legislation and regulation in ways that are unforeseeable. Many of the implementing regulations have not yet been finalized. Accordingly, the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act, including on the derivative instruments in which the Fund may invest, is not yet certain. |
Equity Securities
Equity securities include common and preferred stock, convertible securities, and warrants. Common stock represents an equity or ownership interest in a company. Although this interest often gives a Fund the right to vote on measures affecting the company’s organization and operations, neither Fund intends to exercise control over the management of companies in which it invests. Common stocks have a history of long-term growth in value, but their prices tend to fluctuate in the shorter term. Preferred stock generally does not exhibit as great a potential for appreciation or depreciation as common stock, although it ranks above common stock in its claim on income for dividend payments. The market value of all securities, including equity securities, is based upon the market’s perception of value and not necessarily the book value of an issuer or other objective measure of a company’s worth.
Fixed-Income Securities
The Funds may invest in fixed-income securities. Fixed-income securities include a broad array of short-, medium-, and long-term obligations issued by the U.S. or foreign governments, government or international agencies and instrumentalities, and corporate and private issuers of various types. The maturity date is the date on which a fixed-income security matures. This is the date on which the borrower must pay back the borrowed amount, which is known as the principal. Some fixed-income securities represent uncollateralized obligations of their issuers; in other cases, the securities may be backed by specific assets (such as mortgages or other receivables) that have been set aside as collateral for the issuer’s obligation. Fixed-income securities generally involve an obligation of the issuer to pay interest or dividends on either a current basis or at the maturity of the security, as well as the obligation to repay the principal amount of the security at maturity. The rate of interest on fixed-income securities may be fixed, floating, or variable. Some securities pay a higher interest rate than the current market rate. An investor may have to pay more than the security’s principal to compensate the seller for the value of the higher interest rate. This additional payment is a premium.
Fixed-income securities are subject to credit risk, market risk, and interest rate risk. Except to the extent values are affected by other factors such as developments relating to a specific issuer, generally the value of a fixed-income security can be expected to rise when interest rates decline and, conversely, the value of such a security can be expected to fall when interest rates rise. Some fixed-income securities may be subject to extension risk. This is the risk that if interest rates rise, repayments of principal on certain debt securities, including, but not limited to, floating rate loans and mortgage-related securities, may occur at a slower rate than expected and the expected maturity of those securities could lengthen as a result. Some fixed-income securities also involve prepayment or call risk. This is the risk that the issuer will repay the Fund the principal on the security before it is due, thus depriving the Fund of a favorable stream of future interest or dividend payments. The Fund could buy another security, but that other security might pay a lower interest rate. In addition, many fixed-income securities contain call or buy-back features that permit their issuers to call or repurchase the securities from their holders. Such securities may present risks based on payment expectations. Although the Fund would typically receive a premium if an issuer were to redeem a security, if an issuer were to exercise a call option and redeem the security during times of declining interest rates, the Fund may realize a capital loss on its investment if the security was purchased at a premium and the Fund may be forced to replace the called security with a lower yielding security.
12
Changes by nationally recognized securities rating organizations (“NRSROs”) in their ratings of any fixed-income security or the issuer of a fixed-income security and changes in the ability of an issuer to make payments of interest and principal may also affect the value of these investments. Changes in the value of portfolio securities generally will not affect income derived from these securities, but will affect the Fund’s NAV.
Because interest rates vary, it is impossible to predict the income, if any, for any particular period for the Fund that invests in fixed-income securities. Fluctuations in the value of the Fund’s investments in fixed-income securities will cause the NAV of each class of the Fund to fluctuate also.
Duration is an estimate of how much a bond Fund’s share price will fluctuate in response to a change in interest rates. In general, the value of a fixed-income security with positive duration will generally decline if interest rates increase, whereas the value of a security with negative duration will generally decline if interest rates decrease. If interest rates rise by one percentage point, the share price of the Fund representing a portfolio of debt securities with an average duration of five years would be expected to decline by approximately 5%. If rates decrease by a percentage point, the share price of the Fund representing a portfolio of debt securities with an average duration of five years would be expected to rise by approximately 5%. The greater the duration of a bond (whether positive or negative), the greater its percentage price volatility. Only a pure discount bond – that is, one with no coupon or sinking-fund payments – has a duration equal to the remaining maturity of the bond, because only in this case does the present value of the final redemption payment represent the entirety of the present value of the bond. For all other bonds, duration is less than maturity.
Foreign Securities
The Equity Allocation Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund, and Taxable Bond Fund invest in securities or funds (which may be denominated in U.S. dollars or non-U.S. currencies) issued or guaranteed by foreign corporations, certain supranational entities (described below) and foreign governments or their agencies or instrumentalities, and in securities issued by U.S. corporations denominated in non-U.S. currencies. All such securities are referred to as “foreign securities.”
Investing in foreign securities offers potential benefits not available from investing solely in securities of domestic issuers, including the opportunity to invest in foreign issuers that appear to offer growth potential, or in foreign countries with economic policies or business cycles different from those of the U.S., or to reduce fluctuations in portfolio value by taking advantage of foreign stock markets that do not move in a manner parallel to U.S. markets. If a Fund’s portfolio securities are held abroad, the countries in which they may be held and the sub-custodians or depositories holding them must be approved by the Board to the extent that approval is required under applicable rules of the SEC.
13
Investments in foreign securities present special additional risks and considerations not typically associated with investments in domestic securities: reduction of income by foreign taxes; fluctuation in value of foreign portfolio investments due to changes in currency rates and control regulations (e.g., currency blockage); transaction charges for currency exchange; lack of public information about foreign issuers; lack of uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers; less trading volume on foreign exchanges than on U.S. exchanges; greater volatility and less liquidity on foreign markets than in the U.S.; less regulation of foreign issuers, stock exchanges and brokers than in the U.S.; greater difficulties in commencing lawsuits and obtaining judgments in foreign courts; higher brokerage commission rates than in the U.S.; increased risks of delays in settlement of portfolio transactions or loss of certificates for portfolio securities; possibilities in some countries of expropriation, confiscatory taxation, political, financial or social instability or adverse diplomatic developments; and unfavorable differences between the U.S. economy and foreign economies. In the past, U.S. Government policies have discouraged certain investments abroad by U.S. investors, through taxation or other restrictions, and it is possible that such restrictions could be re-imposed.
Inflation-Indexed Securities
Inflation-indexed securities are debt securities, the principal value of which is periodically adjusted to reflect the rate of inflation as indicated by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Inflation-indexed securities may be issued by the U.S. government, by agencies and instrumentalities of the U.S. government, and by corporations. Two structures are common. The U.S. Treasury and some other issuers use a structure that accrues inflation into the principal value of the bond. Most other issuers pay out the CPI accruals as part of a semiannual coupon payment.
The periodic adjustment of U.S. inflation-indexed securities is tied to the CPI, which is calculated monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI is a measurement of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation, and energy. Inflation-indexed securities issued by a foreign government are generally adjusted to reflect a comparable inflation index, calculated by that government. There can be no assurance that the CPI or any foreign inflation index will accurately measure the real rate of inflation in the prices of goods and services. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the rate of inflation in a foreign country will correlate to the rate of inflation in the United States.
Inflation—a general rise in prices of goods and services—erodes the purchasing power of an investor’s portfolio. For example, if an investment provides a “nominal” total return of 5% in a given year and inflation is 2% during that period, the inflation-adjusted, or real, return is 3%. Inflation, as measured by the CPI, has generally occurred during the past 50 years, so investors should be conscious of both the nominal and real returns of their investments. Investors in inflation-indexed securities funds who do not reinvest the portion of the income distribution that is attributable to inflation adjustments will not maintain the purchasing power of the investment over the long term. This is because interest earned depends on the amount of principal invested, and that principal will not grow with inflation if the investor fails to reinvest the principal adjustment paid out as part of the Fund’s income distributions. Although inflation-indexed securities are expected to be protected from long-term inflationary trends, short-term increases in inflation may lead to a decline in value. If interest rates rise because of reasons other than inflation (e.g., changes in currency exchange rates), investors in these securities may not be protected to the extent that the increase is not reflected in the bond’s inflation measure.
If the periodic adjustment rate measuring inflation (i.e., the CPI) falls, the principal value of inflation-indexed securities will be adjusted downward, and consequently the interest payable on these securities (calculated with respect to a smaller principal amount) will be reduced. Repayment of the original bond principal upon maturity (as adjusted for inflation) is guaranteed in the case of U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed securities, even during a period of deflation. However, the current market value of the inflation-indexed securities is not guaranteed and will fluctuate. Other inflation-indexed securities include inflation-related bonds, which may or may not provide a similar guarantee. If a guarantee of principal is not provided, the adjusted principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal.
14
The value of inflation-indexed securities should change in response to changes in real interest rates. Real interest rates, in turn, are tied to the relationship between nominal interest rates and the rate of inflation. Therefore, if inflation were to rise at a faster rate than nominal interest rates, real interest rates might decline, leading to an increase in value of inflation-indexed securities. In contrast, if nominal interest rates were to increase at a faster rate than inflation, real interest rates might rise, leading to a decrease in value of inflation-indexed securities.
Coupon payments that the Fund receives from inflation-indexed securities are included in the fund’s gross income for the period during which they accrue. Any increase in principal for an inflation-indexed security resulting from inflation adjustments is considered by Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regulations to be taxable income in the year it occurs. For direct holders of an inflation-indexed security, this means that taxes must be paid on principal adjustments, even though these amounts are not received until the bond matures. By contrast, if the Fund holds these securities, it distributes both interest income and the income attributable to principal adjustments each quarter in the form of cash or reinvested shares (which, like principal adjustments, are taxable to shareholders). It may be necessary for the Fund to liquidate portfolio positions, including when it is not advantageous to do so, in order to make required distributions.
Investment Companies and Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
The Funds invest in other investment companies, such as U.S. and foreign mutual funds (for example, Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (“UCITS”)), closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds, business development companies, and other pooled investment vehicles including hedge funds and private funds. Section 12(d)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) generally limits investment in other investment companies to 3% of the total voting stock of any one investment company; 5% of a fund’s total assets with respect to any one investment company; and 10% of a fund’s total assets in the aggregate. The Funds are permitted to invest in other investment companies beyond the limits set forth in Section 12(d)(1) subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the 1940 Act or rule, regulation, no-action relief, or exemptive relief thereunder. A Fund will only invest in other pooled investment vehicles that invest primarily in Fund-eligible investments.
When a Fund invests in other pooled investment vehicles, its shareholders will bear not only their proportionate share of the Fund’s expenses, but also, indirectly, the similar expenses of the underlying investment vehicles. Shareholders would also be exposed to the risks associated not only to the Fund, but also to the portfolio investments of the underlying investment vehicles. Shares of certain closed-end funds may at times be acquired only at market prices representing premiums to their net asset values. Shares acquired at a premium to their net asset value may be more likely to subsequently decline in price, resulting in a loss to the Fund and its shareholders. The underlying securities in an exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) may not follow the price movements of the industry or sector the ETF is designed to track. Trading in an ETF may be halted if the trading in one or more of the ETF’s underlying securities is halted, which could result in the ETF being more volatile.
15
Lending Portfolio Securities
Each Fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, and financial institutions in an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of the value of the Fund’s total assets. These loans will be secured by collateral (consisting of cash, U.S. government securities, or irrevocable letters of credit) maintained in an amount equal to at least 100% of the market value, determined daily, of the loaned securities. The Fund may, subject to certain notice requirements, at any time call the loan and obtain the return of the securities loaned. The Fund will be entitled to payments equal to the interest and dividends on the loaned securities and may receive a premium for lending the securities. The advantage of such loans is that the Fund continues to receive the income on the loaned securities while earning interest on the cash amounts deposited as collateral, which will be invested in short-term investments.
A loan may be terminated by the borrower on one business day’s notice or by the Trust on two business days’ notice. If the borrower fails to deliver the loaned securities within four days after receipt of notice, the Trust may use the collateral to replace the securities while holding the borrower liable for any excess of replacement cost exceeding the collateral. As with any extensions of credit, there are risks of delay in recovery and, in some cases, even loss of rights in the collateral, should the borrower of the securities fail financially. In addition, securities lending involves a form of leverage, and the Fund may incur a loss if securities purchased with the collateral from securities loans decline in value or if the income earned does not cover the Fund’s transaction costs. However, loans of securities will be made only to companies the Board deems to be creditworthy (such creditworthiness will be monitored on an ongoing basis) and when the income that can be earned from such loans justifies the attendant risks. Upon termination of the loan, the borrower is required to return the securities. Any gain or loss in the market price during the loan period would inure to the Fund. Securities lending also may have certain potential adverse tax consequences.
When voting or consent rights that accompany loaned securities pass to the borrower, the Trust will follow the policy of calling the loaned securities, to be delivered within one day after notice, to permit the exercise of such rights if the Adviser or sub-adviser believes the matters involved would have a material effect on the investment in such loaned securities. The Fund will pay reasonable finder’s, administrative, and custodial fees in connection with loans of securities. The Fund may lend foreign securities consistent with the foregoing requirements.
Loans to Issuers of Bonds in Portfolio
The Funds may make a loan to (as opposed to investing in a bond issued by) an entity whose bonds that Fund already owns in its portfolio in instances where the Adviser or sub-advisers believe that doing so will enhance the value of the Fund’s total investments (both bonds and loans) in obligations of that entity. Typically, such loans will be made to entities suffering severe economic distress, oftentimes in or near bankruptcy. Making a loan to such an entity may enable the entity to remain a “going concern” and enable the entity to both repay the loan as well as be better able to pay interest and principal on the pre-existing bonds, instead of forcing the Fund to liquidate the entity’s assets, which can reduce recovery value. It is generally much more time-consuming and expensive for a troubled entity to issue additional bonds, instead of borrowing, as a means of obtaining liquidity in times of severe financial need.
Master Limited Partnerships
The Equity Allocation Fund and Defensive Allocation Fund may invest in master limited partnerships (“MLPs”), which are publicly traded companies organized as limited partnerships or limited liability companies and treated as partnerships for U.S. federal tax purposes. MLPs combine the tax advantages of a partnership with the liquidity of a publicly traded stock. MLP income is generally not subject to entity-level tax. Instead, an MLP’s income, gain, loss, deductions, and other tax items pass through to common unitholders. If tax were to be required to be paid by an MLP at the entity level, the value of the MLP interests held by a Fund would be expected to decrease.
16
MLPs are typically structured such that common units and general partner interests have first priority to receive quarterly cash distributions up to an established minimum amount (“MQD”). Common units and general partner interests also accrue arrearages in distributions to the extent that the MQD is not paid. Once common units and general partner interests have been paid, subordinated units receive distributions of up to the MQD. However, subordinated units do not accrue arrearages. Distributable cash in excess of the MQD paid to both common and subordinated units is distributed to both common and subordinated units generally on a pro rata basis. The general partner is also eligible to receive incentive distributions if the general partner operates the business in a manner that causes distributions paid per common unit surpassing specified target levels. As the general partner increases cash distributions to the limited partners, the general partner receives an increasingly higher percentage of the incremental cash distributions. A common arrangement provides that the general partner can reach a tier at which it receives 50% of every incremental dollar paid to common and subordinated unitholders. These incentive distributions encourage the general partner to streamline costs, increase capital expenditures, and acquire assets in order to increase the partnership’s cash flow and raise the quarterly cash distribution in order to reach higher tiers. Such results benefit all security holders of the MLP.
Mortgage-Backed Securities
The Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund may invest in mortgage-backed securities, which represent direct or indirect participation in, or are collateralized by and payable from, mortgage loans secured by real property or instruments derived from such loans and may be based on different types of mortgages, including those on residential properties or commercial real estate. Mortgage-backed securities include various types of securities, such as government stripped mortgage-backed securities, adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations.
Generally, mortgage-backed securities represent partial interests in pools of mortgage loans assembled for sale to investors by various governmental agencies, such as the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA); by government-related organizations, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC); and by private issuers, such as commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, and mortgage bankers. The average maturity of pass-through pools of mortgage-backed securities in which the Fund may invest varies with the maturities of the underlying mortgage instruments. In addition, a pool’s average maturity may be shortened by unscheduled payments on the underlying mortgages. Factors affecting mortgage prepayments include the level of interest rates, the general economic and social conditions, the location of the mortgaged property, and the age of the mortgage. Because prepayment rates of individual mortgage pools vary widely, the average life of a particular pool cannot be predicted accurately.
Mortgage-backed securities may be classified as private, government, or government-related, depending on the issuer or guarantor. Private mortgage-backed securities represent interest in pass-through pools consisting principally of conventional residential or commercial mortgage loans created by nongovernment issuers, such as commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and private mortgage insurance companies. Private mortgage-backed securities may not be readily marketable. In addition, mortgage-backed securities have been subject to greater liquidity risk because of the deterioration of worldwide economic and liquidity conditions that became especially severe in 2008. U.S. government mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. GNMA, the principal U.S. guarantor of these securities, is a wholly owned U.S. government corporation within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Government-related mortgage-backed securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Issuers include FNMA and FHLMC, which are congressionally chartered corporations. In September 2008, the U.S. Treasury placed FNMA and FHLMC under conservatorship and appointed the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to manage their daily operations. In addition, the U.S. Treasury entered into purchase agreements with FNMA and FHLMC to provide them with capital in exchange for senior preferred stock. Pass-through securities issued by FNMA are guaranteed as to timely payment of principal and interest by FNMA. Participation certificates representing interests in mortgages from FHLMC’s national portfolio are guaranteed as to the timely payment of interest and principal by FHLMC. Private, government, or government-related entities may create mortgage loan pools offering pass-through investments in addition to those described above. The mortgages underlying these securities may be alternative mortgage instruments (i.e., mortgage instruments whose principal or interest payments may vary or whose terms to maturity may be shorter than customary).
17
Mortgage-backed securities are often subject to more rapid repayment than their stated maturity date would indicate as a result of the pass-through of prepayments of principal on the underlying loans. Prepayments of principal by mortgagors or mortgage foreclosures shorten the term of the mortgage pool underlying the mortgage-backed security. The Fund’s ability to maintain positions in mortgage-backed securities is affected by the reductions in the principal amount of such securities resulting from prepayments. The Fund’s ability to reinvest prepayments of principal at comparable yield is subject to generally prevailing interest rates at that time. The values of mortgage-backed securities vary with changes in market interest rates generally and the differentials in yields among various kinds of government securities, mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities. In periods of rising interest rates, the rate of prepayment tends to decrease, thereby lengthening the average life of a pool of mortgages supporting a mortgage-backed security. Conversely, in periods of falling interest rates, the rate of prepayment tends to increase, thereby shortening the average life of such a pool. Because prepayments of principal generally occur when interest rates are declining, an investor, such as the Fund, generally has to reinvest the proceeds of such prepayments at lower interest rates than those at which its assets were previously invested. Therefore, mortgage-backed securities have less potential for capital appreciation in periods of falling interest rates than other income-bearing securities of comparable maturity.
Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities
Adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities (ARMBSs) have interest rates that reset at periodic intervals. Acquiring ARMBSs permits the Fund to participate in increases in prevailing current interest rates through periodic adjustments in the coupons of mortgages underlying the pool on which ARMBSs are based. Such ARMBSs generally have higher current yield and lower price fluctuations than is the case with more traditional fixed income debt securities of comparable rating and maturity. However, because the interest rates on ARMBSs are reset only periodically, changes in market interest rates or in the issuer’s creditworthiness may affect their value. In addition, when prepayments of principal are made on the underlying mortgages during periods of rising interest rates, the Fund can reinvest the proceeds of such prepayments at rates higher than those at which they were previously invested. Mortgages underlying most ARMBSs, however, have limits on the allowable annual or lifetime increases that can be made in the interest rate that the mortgagor pays. Therefore, if current interest rates rise above such limits over the period of the limitation, the Fund would not benefit from further increases in interest rates. Moreover, when interest rates are in excess of coupon rates (i.e., the rates being paid by mortgagors) of the mortgages, ARMBSs behave more like fixed income securities and less like adjustable rate securities and are thus subject to the risks associated with fixed income securities. In addition, during periods of rising interest rates, increases in the coupon rate of adjustable rate mortgages generally lag current market interest rates slightly, thereby creating the potential for capital depreciation on such securities.
18
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) are mortgage-backed securities that are collateralized by whole loan mortgages or mortgage pass-through securities. The bonds issued in a CMO transaction are divided into groups, and each group of bonds is referred to as a “tranche.” Under the traditional CMO structure, the cash flows generated by the mortgages or mortgage pass-through securities in the collateral pool are used to first pay interest and then pay principal to the CMO bondholders. The bonds issued under a traditional CMO structure are retired sequentially as opposed to the pro-rata return of principal found in traditional pass-through obligations. Subject to the various provisions of individual CMO issues, the cash flow generated by the underlying collateral (to the extent it exceeds the amount required to pay the stated interest) is used to retire the bonds. Under a CMO structure, the repayment of principal among the different tranches is prioritized in accordance with the terms of the particular CMO issuance. The “fastest-pay” tranches of bonds, as specified in the prospectus for the issuance, would initially receive all principal payments. When those tranches of bonds are retired, the next tranche (or tranches) in the sequence, as specified in the prospectus, receives all of the principal payments until that tranche is retired. The sequential retirement of bond groups continues until the last tranche is retired. Accordingly, the CMO structure allows the issuer to use cash flows of long-maturity, monthly pay collateral to formulate securities with short, intermediate, and long final maturities and expected average lives and risk characteristics.
In recent years, new types of CMO tranches have evolved. These include floating rate CMOs, planned amortization classes, accrual bonds, and CMO residuals. These newer structures affect the amount and timing of principal and interest received by each tranche from the underlying collateral. Under certain of these new structures, given classes of CMOs have priority over others with respect to the receipt of prepayments on the mortgages. Therefore, depending on the type of CMOs in which the Fund invests, the investment may be subject to a greater or lesser risk of prepayment than other types of mortgage-backed securities.
CMOs may include real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs). REMICs, which were authorized under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, are private entities formed for the purpose of holding a fixed pool of mortgages secured by an interest in real property. A REMIC is a CMO that qualifies for special tax treatment under the IRC and invests in certain mortgages principally secured by interests in real property. Investors may purchase beneficial interests in REMICs, which are known as “regular” interests, or “residual” interests. Guaranteed REMIC pass-through certificates (REMIC Certificates) issued by FNMA or FHLMC represent beneficial ownership interests in a REMIC trust consisting principally of mortgage loans or FNMA, FHLMC, or GNMA-guaranteed mortgage pass-through certificates. For FHLMC REMIC Certificates, FHLMC guarantees the timely payment of interest and also guarantees the payment of principal, as payments are required to be made on the underlying mortgage participation certificates. FNMA REMIC Certificates are issued and guaranteed as to timely distribution of principal and interest by FNMA.
The primary risk of CMOs is the uncertainty of the timing of cash flows that results from the rate of prepayments on the underlying mortgages serving as collateral and from the structure of the particular CMO transaction (i.e., the priority of the individual tranches). An increase or decrease in prepayment rates (resulting from a decrease or increase in mortgage interest rates) will affect the yield, the average life, and the price of CMOs. The prices of certain CMOs, depending on their structure and the rate of prepayments, can be volatile. Some CMOs may also not be as liquid as other securities.
Hybrid ARMs
A hybrid adjustable rate mortgage (hybrid ARM) is a type of mortgage in which the interest rate is fixed for a specified period and then resets periodically, or floats, for the remaining mortgage term. Hybrid ARMs are usually referred to by their fixed and floating periods. For example, a 5/1 ARM refers to a mortgage with a 5-year fixed interest rate period, followed by a 1-year interest rate adjustment period. During the initial interest period (i.e., the initial five years for a 5/1 hybrid ARM), hybrid ARMs behave more like fixed income securities and are thus subject to the risks associated with fixed income securities. All hybrid ARMs have reset dates. A reset date is the date when a hybrid ARM changes from a fixed interest rate to a floating interest rate. At the reset date, a hybrid ARM can adjust by a maximum specified amount based on a margin over an identified index. Like ARMBSs, hybrid ARMs have periodic and lifetime limitations on the increases that can be made to the interest rates that mortgagors pay. Therefore, if during a floating rate period interest rates rise above the interest rate limits of the hybrid ARM, a fund holding the hybrid ARM does not benefit from further increases in interest rates.
19
Mortgage Dollar Rolls
A mortgage dollar roll is a transaction in which the Fund sells a mortgage-backed security to a dealer and simultaneously agrees to purchase a similar security (but not the same security) in the future at a predetermined price. A mortgage-dollar-roll program may be structured to simulate an investment in mortgage-backed securities at a potentially lower cost, or with potentially reduced administrative burdens, than directly holding mortgage-backed securities. For accounting purposes, each transaction in a mortgage dollar roll is viewed as a separate purchase and sale of a mortgage-backed security. These transactions may increase the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate. The Fund receives cash for a mortgage-backed security in the initial transaction and enters into an agreement that requires the fund to purchase a similar mortgage-backed security in the future.
The counterparty with which the Fund enters into a mortgage-dollar-roll transaction is obligated to provide the fund with similar securities to purchase as those originally sold by the fund. These securities generally must (1) be issued by the same agency and be part of the same program; (2) have similar original stated maturities; (3) have identical net coupon rates; and (4) satisfy “good delivery” requirements, meaning that the aggregate principal amounts of the securities delivered and received back must be within a certain percentage of the initial amount delivered. Mortgage dollar rolls will be used only if consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and strategies and will not be used to change the Fund’s risk profile.
Stripped Mortgage-Backed Securities
Stripped mortgage-backed securities (SMBSs) are derivative multiclass mortgage-backed securities. SMBSs may be issued by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. government or by private originators of, or investors in, mortgage loans, including savings and loan associations, mortgage banks, commercial banks, investment banks, and special purpose entities formed or sponsored by any of the foregoing.
SMBSs are usually structured with two classes that receive different proportions of the interest and principal distributions on a pool of mortgage assets. A common type of SMBS will have one class receiving some of the interest and most of the principal from the mortgage assets, while the other class will receive most of the interest and the remainder of the principal. In the most extreme case, one class will receive all of the interest (the “IO” class), while the other class will receive all of the principal (the principal-only or “PO” class). The price and yield to maturity on an IO class are extremely sensitive to the rate of principal payments (including prepayments) on the related underlying mortgage assets, and a rapid rate of principal payments may have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s yield to maturity from these securities. If the underlying mortgage assets experience greater than anticipated prepayments of principal, the Fund may fail to recoup some or all of its initial investment in these securities, even if the security is in one of the highest rating categories.
20
Although SMBSs are purchased and sold by institutional investors through several investment banking firms acting as brokers or dealers, these securities were only recently developed. As a result, established trading markets have not yet developed, and accordingly, these securities may be deemed “illiquid” and thus subject to the Fund’s limitations on investment in illiquid securities.
To Be Announced (TBA) Securities
A TBA securities transaction, which is a type of forward-commitment transaction, represents an agreement to buy or sell mortgage-backed securities with agreed-upon characteristics for a fixed unit price, with settlement on a scheduled future date, typically within 30 calendar days of the trade date. With TBA transactions, the particular securities (i.e., specified mortgage pools) to be delivered or received are not identified at the trade date; however, securities delivered to a purchaser must meet specified criteria, including face value, coupon rate, and maturity, and be within industry-accepted “good delivery” standards. The fund may sell TBA securities to hedge its portfolio positions or to dispose of mortgage-backed securities it owns under delayed-delivery arrangements. Proceeds of TBA securities sold are not received until the contractual settlement date. For TBA purchases, the fund will maintain sufficient liquid assets (e.g., cash or marketable securities) until settlement date in an amount sufficient to meet the purchase price. Unsettled TBA securities are valued by an independent pricing service based on the characteristics of the securities to be delivered or received.
Municipal Bonds and Other Municipal Obligations
The Municipal Bond Fund invests principally in municipal bonds and other municipal obligations. The Equity Allocation Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund may invest in such securities. These bonds and other obligations are issued by the states and by their local and special-purpose political subdivisions. The term “municipal bond” includes short-term municipal notes issued by the states and their political subdivisions, including, but not limited to, tax anticipation notes (“TANs”), bond anticipation notes (“BANs”), revenue anticipation notes (“RANs”), construction loan notes, tax free commercial paper, and tax free participation certificates. In general, municipal obligations include debt obligations issued by states, cities, and local authorities to obtain funds for various public purposes, including construction of a wide range of public facilities such as airports, bridges, highways, hospitals, housing, mass transportation, schools, streets, and water and sewer works. Industrial development bonds and pollution control bonds that are issued by or on behalf of public authorities to finance various privately-rated facilities are included within the term municipal obligations if the interest paid thereon is exempt from regular federal income tax.
Obligations of issuers of municipal obligations are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors. In addition, the obligations of such issuers may become subject to the laws enacted in the future by Congress, state legislatures or referenda extending the time for payment of principal and/or interest, or imposing other constraints upon enforcement of such obligations or upon municipalities to levy taxes. There is also the possibility that, as a result of legislation or other conditions, the power or ability of any issuer to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on its municipal obligations may be materially affected.
Municipal Bonds
The two general classifications of municipal bonds are general obligation bonds and revenue bonds. General obligation bonds are secured by the governmental issuer’s pledge of its faith, credit, and taxing power for the payment of principal and interest upon a default by the issuer of its principal and interest payment obligations. They are usually paid from general revenues of the issuing governmental entity. Revenue bonds, on the other hand, are usually payable only out of a specific revenue source rather than from general revenues. Revenue bonds ordinarily are not backed by the faith, credit, or general taxing power of the issuing governmental entity. The principal and interest on revenue bonds for private facilities are typically paid out of rents or other specified payments made to the issuing governmental entity by a private company which uses or operates the facilities. Examples of these types of obligations are industrial revenue bond and pollution control revenue bonds. Industrial revenue bonds are issued by governmental entities to provide financing aid to community facilities such as hospitals, hotels, business or residential complexes, convention halls and sport complexes. Pollution control revenue bonds are issued to finance air, water and solids pollution control systems for privately operated industrial or commercial facilities.
21
Revenue bonds for private facilities usually do not represent a pledge of the credit, general revenues, or taxing powers of issuing governmental entity. Instead, the private company operating the facility is the sole source of payment of the obligation. Sometimes the funds for payment of revenue bonds come solely from revenue generated by operation of the facility. Federal income tax laws place substantial limitations on industrial revenue bonds, and particularly certain specified private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986. In the future, legislation could be introduced in Congress that could further restrict or eliminate the regular federal income tax exemption for interest on debt obligations in which the Fund may invest.
Refunded Bonds
The Fund may invest in refunded bonds. Refunded bonds may have originally been issued as general obligation or revenue bonds, but become refunded when they are secured by an escrow fund, usually consisting entirely of direct U.S. government obligations and/or U.S. government agency obligations sufficient for paying the bondholders. There are two types of refunded bonds -- pre-refunded bonds and escrowed-to-maturity (“ETM”) bonds. The escrow fund for a pre-refunded municipal bond may be structured so that the refunded bonds are to be called at the first possible date or a subsequent call date established in the original bond debenture. The call price usually includes a premium from 1% to 3% above par. This type of structure usually is used for those refundings that either reduce the issuer’s interest payment expenses or change the debt maturity schedule. In escrow funds for ETM refunded municipal bonds, the maturity schedules of the securities in the escrow funds match the regular debt-service requirements on the bonds as originally stated in the bond indentures.
Municipal Leases and Certificates of Participation
The Fund also may purchase municipal lease obligations, primarily through certificates of participation. Certificates of participation in municipal leases are undivided interests in a lease, installment purchase contract or conditional sale contract entered into by a state or local governmental unit to acquire equipment or facilities. Municipal leases frequently have special risks which generally are not associated with general obligation bonds or revenue bonds.
Municipal leases and installment purchase or conditional sales contracts (which usually provide for title to the leased asset to pass to the governmental issuer upon payment of all amounts due under the contract) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of municipal debt. The debt issuance limitations are deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion in many leases and contracts of “non-appropriation” clauses that provide that the governmental issuer has no obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for this purpose by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis. Although these kinds of obligations are secured by the leased equipment or facilities, the disposition of the pledged property in the event of non-appropriation or foreclosure might, in some cases, prove difficult and time-consuming. In addition, disposition upon non-appropriation or foreclosure might not result in recovery by the Fund of the full principal amount represented by an obligation.
22
In light of these concerns, the Adviser or sub-advisers determine whether any municipal lease obligations purchased by the Fund are liquid and monitors the liquidity of municipal lease securities held in the Fund’s portfolio. A number of factors be used in evaluating the liquidity of a municipal lease security, including the frequency of trades and quotes for the security, the number of dealers willing to purchase or sell the security and the number of other potential purchasers, the willingness of dealers to undertake to make a market in security, the nature of the marketplace in which the security trades, and other factors that may be deemed relevant.
Derivative Municipal Securities
The Fund may acquire derivative municipal securities, which are custodial receipts of certificates underwritten by securities dealers or banks that evidence ownership of future interest payments, principal payments, or both on certain municipal securities. The underwriter of these certificates or receipts typically purchases municipal securities and deposits them in an irrevocable trust or custodial account with a custodian bank, which then issues receipts or certificates that evidence ownership of the periodic unmatured coupon payments and the final principal payment on the obligation.
The principal and interest payments on the municipal securities underlying custodial receipts may be allocated in a number of ways. For example, payments may be allocated such that certain custodial receipts may have variable or floating interest rates and others may be stripped securities which pay only the principal or interest due on the underlying municipal securities. The Fund may invest in custodial receipts which have inverse floating interest rates and other inverse floating rate municipal obligations, as described below under “Inverse Floating Rate Municipal Obligations.”
Inverse Floating Rate Municipal Securities
The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate municipal securities or “inverse floaters,” whose rates vary inversely to interest rates on a specified short-term municipal bond index or on another instrument. Such securities involve special risks as compared to conventional fixed-rate bonds. Should short-term interest rates rise, the Fund’s investment in inverse floaters likely would adversely affect the Fund’s earnings and distributions to shareholders. Also, because changes in the interest rate on the other index or other instrument inversely affect the rate of interest received on an inverse floater, and because inverse floaters essentially represent a leveraged investment in a long-term bond, the value of an inverse floater is generally more volatile than that of a conventional fixed-rate bond having similar credit quality, redemption provisions and maturity. Although volatile in value, inverse floaters typically offer the potential for yields substantially exceeding the yields available on conventional fixed-rate bonds with comparable credit quality, coupon, call provisions and maturity. The markets for inverse floating rate securities may be less developed and have less liquidity than the markets for conventional securities. The Fund will only invest in inverse floating rate securities whose underlying bonds are rated A or higher.
Non-Investment Grade Debt Securities (Junk Bonds)
The Municipal Bond Fund and Taxable Bond Fund will generally invest in non-investment grade debt securities, which include medium- to low-quality obligations. The Equity Allocation Fund and Defensive Allocation Fund may invest in such securities. Debt securities rated below investment grade (BB/Ba or lower) are commonly known as “high-yield,” “high risk” or “junk” bonds. Junk bonds, while generally offering higher yields than investment grade securities with similar maturities, involve greater risks, including the possibility of default or bankruptcy. They are regarded as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. The special risk considerations in connection with investments in these securities are discussed below. Refer to Appendix A for a discussion of securities ratings.
23
(1) | Effect of Interest Rates and Economic Changes. All interest-bearing securities typically experience appreciation when interest rates decline and depreciation when interest rates rise. In addition, the market values of junk bond securities tend to reflect individual issuer developments to a greater extent than do the market values of higher rated securities, which react primarily to fluctuations in the general level of interest rates. Junk bond securities also tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions than are higher rated securities. As a result, they generally involve more credit risk than securities in the higher rated categories. During an economic downturn or a sustained period of rising interest rates, highly leveraged issuers of junk bond securities may experience financial stress and may not have sufficient revenues to meet their payment obligations. The risk of loss due to default by an issuer of these securities is significantly greater than by an issuer of higher rated securities because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors. Further, if the issuer of a junk bond security defaults, the Fund may incur additional expenses to seek recovery. Periods of economic uncertainty and changes would also generally result in increased volatility in the market prices of these and thus in the Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”). |
The value of a junk bond security will generally decrease in a rising interest rate market and, accordingly, so will the Fund’s NAV. If the Fund experiences unexpected net redemptions in such a market, it may be forced to liquidate a portion of its portfolio securities without regard to their investment merits. Due to the limited liquidity of junk bond securities, the Fund may be forced to liquidate these securities at a substantial discount. Any such liquidation would reduce the Fund’s asset base over which expenses could be allocated and could result in a reduced rate of return for the Fund.
(2) | Payment Expectations. Junk bond securities typically contain redemption, call, or prepayment provisions that permit the issuer of securities containing such provisions to redeem the securities at its discretion. During periods of falling interest rates, issuers of these securities are likely to redeem or prepay the securities and refinance them with debt securities with a lower interest rate. To the extent an issuer is able to refinance the securities, or otherwise redeem them, the Fund may have to replace the securities with lower yielding securities, which could result in a lower return for the Fund. |
(3) | Credit Ratings. Credit ratings are issued by credit rating agencies and are indicative of the rated securities’ safety of principal and interest payments. They do not, however, evaluate the market value risk of junk bond securities and, therefore, may not fully reflect the true risks of such an investment. In addition, credit rating agencies may not make timely changes in a rating to reflect changes in the economy or in the condition of the issuer that affect the value of the security. Consequently, credit ratings are used only as a preliminary indicator of investment quality. Investments in junk bonds will depend more upon credit analysis by the sub-advisers than investments in investment grade debt securities. The sub-advisers employ their own credit research and analysis, which includes a study of the issuer’s existing debt, capital structure, ability to service debts and pay dividends, sensitivity to economic conditions, operating history, and current earnings trend. The sub-advisers continually monitor the Fund’s investments and carefully evaluate whether to dispose of or to retain junk bond securities whose credit ratings or credit quality may have changed. |
24
(4) | Liquidity and Valuation. The Fund may have difficulty disposing of certain junk bond securities because there may be a thin trading market for such securities. Not all dealers maintain markets in all junk bond securities. As a result, there is no established retail secondary market for many of these securities. To the extent a secondary trading market does exist, it is generally not as liquid as the secondary market for higher rated securities. The lack of a liquid secondary market may have an adverse impact on the market price of the security. The lack of a liquid secondary market for certain securities may also make it more difficult for the Fund to obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing its securities. Market quotations are generally available on many junk bond issues only from a limited number of dealers and may not necessarily represent firm bids of such dealers or prices for actual sales. During periods of thin trading, the spread between bid and asked prices is likely to increase significantly. In addition, adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the value and liquidity of junk bond securities, especially in a thinly traded market. |
The Municipal Bond Fund may invest up to 10% of its net assets in defaulted municipal obligations. Municipal obligations in the lowest rating categories may be in default and are generally regarded as having poor prospects of attaining any real investment standing. A default or expected default in a municipal obligation owned by the Fund could result in a significant decline in the value of that municipal obligation.
Payment-In-Kind Debentures and Delayed Interest Securities
The Funds may invest in debentures the interest on which may be paid in other securities rather than cash (“PIKs”) or may be delayed (“delayed interest securities”). Typically, during a specified term prior to the debenture’s maturity, the issuer of a PIK may provide for the option or the obligation to make interest payments in debentures, common stock or other instruments (i.e., in kind rather than in cash). The type of instrument in which interest may or will be paid would be known by the Fund at the time of investment. While PIKs generate income for purposes of generally accepted accounting standards, they do not generate cash flow and thus could cause the Fund to be forced to liquidate securities at an inopportune time in order to distribute cash, as required by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Unlike PIKs, delayed interest securities do not pay interest for a specified period. Because values of securities of this type are subject to greater fluctuations than are the values of securities that distribute income regularly, they may be more speculative than such securities.
Real Estate Investment Trusts
The Equity Allocation Fund and Defensive Allocation Fund may invest in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and REIT-like entities, which are pooled investment vehicles that manage a portfolio of real estate or real estate-related loans to earn profits for their shareholders. REITs are generally classified as equity REITs, mortgage REITs, or a combination of equity and mortgage REITs. Investing in REITs and REIT-like entities involves certain unique risks in addition to the risks associated with investing in the real estate industry in general. Equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property owned by the REITs, and mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of the borrower on any credit extended. REITs and REIT-like entities are dependent on management skills, may not be diversified geographically or by property type, and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, default by borrowers, and self-liquidation. U.S. REITs must also meet certain requirements under the Code, to avoid entity-level tax and be eligible to pass through certain tax attributes of their income to shareholders. U.S. REITs are consequently subject to the risk of failing to meet these requirements for favorable tax treatment and of failing to maintain their exemptions from registration under the 1940 Act. U.S. REITs are also subject to the risks of changes in the Code that could affect their tax status.
25
REITs and REIT-like entities (especially mortgage REITs) are also subject to interest rate risks. When interest rates decline, the value of a REIT’s investment in fixed-rate obligations can be expected to rise. Conversely, when interest rates rise, the value of a REIT’s investment in fixed-rate obligations can be expected to decline. In contrast, as interest rates on adjustable-rate mortgage loans are reset periodically, yields on a REIT’s investments in such loans will gradually align themselves to reflect changes in market interest rates, and as a result, the value of such investments will fluctuate less dramatically in response to interest rate fluctuations than would investments in fixed-rate obligations.
The management of a REIT and REIT-like entities may be subject to conflicts of interest with respect to the operation of the business of the REIT and may be involved in real estate activities competitive with the REIT. REITs may own properties through joint ventures or in other circumstances in which a REIT may not have control over its investments. REITs may use significant amounts of leverage.
REITs often do not provide complete tax information until after the end of the calendar year. Consequently, because of the delay, it may be necessary for the Fund, if invested in REITs, to request permission to extend the deadline for issuance of Forms 1099-DIV beyond January 31. Alternatively, amended Forms 1099-DIV may be sent.
Repurchase Agreements
The Funds may enter into repurchase agreements involving the types of securities eligible for purchase by the Funds. However, there is no limitation on the maturity of the securities underlying the repurchase agreements. The Funds may use repurchase agreements in lieu of purchasing money market instruments.
Repurchase agreements, which may be viewed as a type of secured lending by the Fund, typically involve the acquisition by the Fund of U.S. government securities or other securities from a selling financial institution such as a bank, savings and loan association, or broker-dealer. The agreement provides that the Fund will sell back to the institution, and that the institution will repurchase, the underlying security (“collateral”) at a specified price and at a fixed time in the future, usually not more than seven days from the date of purchase. The Fund will receive interest from the institution until the time the repurchase is to occur. Although such date is deemed to be the maturity date of a repurchase agreement, the maturities of securities subject to repurchase agreements are not subject to any limits and may exceed one year.
Repurchase agreements involve certain risks not associated with direct investments in debt securities. If the seller under a repurchase agreement becomes insolvent, the Fund’s right to dispose of the securities may be restricted, or the value of the securities may decline before the Fund is able to dispose of them. In the event of the commencement of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings with respect to the seller of the securities before the repurchase of the securities under a repurchase agreement is accomplished, the Fund may encounter delay and incur costs, including a decline in the value of the securities, before being able to sell the securities. If the seller defaults, the value of such securities may decline before the Fund is able to dispose of them. If the Fund enters into a repurchase agreement that is subject to foreign law and the other party defaults, the Fund may not enjoy protections comparable to those provided to certain repurchase agreements under U.S. bankruptcy law and may suffer delays and losses in disposing of the collateral as a result.
The Fund has adopted procedures designed to minimize the risks of loss from repurchase agreement transactions. These procedures include a requirement that the Adviser effect repurchase transactions only with large, well-capitalized U.S. financial institutions that the Adviser and/or sub-advisers approve as creditworthy based on periodic review under guidelines established and monitored by the Board. In addition, the value of the collateral underlying the repurchase agreement, which the Trust’s custodian will hold on behalf of the Fund, will always be at least equal to the repurchase price, including any accrued interest earned on the repurchase agreement. In the event of a default or bankruptcy by a selling financial institution, the Fund will seek to liquidate such collateral. However, the exercise of the Fund’s right to liquidate such collateral could involve certain costs or delays and, to the extent that proceeds from any sale upon a default of the obligation to repurchase were less than the repurchase price, the Fund could suffer a loss.
26
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. Under a reverse repurchase agreement, the fund continues to receive any principal and interest payments on the underlying security during the term of the agreement. Reverse repurchase agreements involve the risk that the market value of securities retained by the fund may decline below the repurchase price of the securities sold by the fund that it is obligated to repurchase. In addition to the risk of such a loss, fees charged to the fund may exceed the return the fund earns from investing the proceeds received from the reverse repurchase agreement transaction. A reverse repurchase agreement may be considered a borrowing transaction for purposes of the 1940 Act. A Fund may elect to treat reverse repurchase agreements as a type of borrowing subject to the asset coverage requirements of Section 18 of the 1940 Act or it may treat reverse repurchase agreements as derivatives transactions under the Derivatives Rule including, as applicable, the VaR based limit on leverage risk. The Fund will enter into reverse repurchase agreements only with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by the Adviser. If the buyer in a reverse repurchase agreement becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy, the Fund’s use of proceeds from the sale may be restricted while the other party or its trustee or receiver determines if it will honor the fund’s right to repurchase the securities. If the Fund is unable to recover the securities it sold in a reverse repurchase agreement, it would realize a loss equal to the difference between the value of the securities and the payment it received for them.
Restricted Securities and Illiquid Investments
A Fund may not acquire an illiquid investment if, immediately after the acquisition, the Fund would have invested more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid investments. The liquidity of an investment will be determined based on relevant market, trading and investment specific considerations as set out in the Trust’s liquidity risk management program (“Liquidity Program”). Illiquid investments are investments that a Fund reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment. If illiquid investments exceed 15% of a Fund’s net assets, the Liquidity Program requires that certain remedial actions be taken.
Illiquid investments may trade at a discount to comparable, more liquid investments and a Fund may not be able to dispose of illiquid investments in a timely fashion or at their expected prices. A Fund may experience difficulty valuing and selling illiquid investments and, in some cases, may be unable to value or sell certain illiquid investments for an indefinite period of time. Illiquid investments may include a wide variety of investments, such as (1) repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days (unless the agreements have demand/redemption features), (2) OTC options contracts and certain other derivatives (including certain swap agreements), (3) fixed time deposits that are not subject to prepayment or do not provide for withdrawal penalties upon prepayment (other than overnight deposits), (4) certain loan interests and other direct debt instruments, (5) certain municipal lease obligations, (6) private equity investments, (7) commercial paper issued pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act, and (8) securities whose disposition is restricted under the federal securities laws. Illiquid investments include restricted, privately placed securities that, under the federal securities laws, generally may be resold only to qualified institutional buyers. If a substantial market develops for a restricted security held by the Fund, it may be treated as a liquid security in accordance with the Liquidity Program. This generally includes securities that are unregistered, that can be sold to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A under the 1933 Act, or that are exempt from registration under the 1933 Act, such as commercial paper. Several factors are considered when making and monitoring liquidity determinations including the valuation of a security; the availability of qualified institutional buyers, brokers, and dealers that trade in the security; and the availability of information about the security’s issuer.
27
Short-Term Investments
The Funds will invest only in taxable short-term investments that are either (i) U.S. government securities, (ii) rated within the highest grade by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, or Fitch and mature within one year from the date of purchase or carry a variable or floating rate of interest, or (iii) taxable money market funds. See Appendix A for more information about ratings by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch.
The Funds may invest in the following short-term investments, the income derived from which is generally exempt from regular federal income tax:
Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs) -- BANs are usually general obligations of state and local governmental issuers, which are sold to obtain interim financing for projects that will eventually be funded through the sale of long-term debt obligations or bonds. The ability of an issuer to meet its obligations on its BANs is primarily dependent on the issuer’s access to the long-term municipal bond market and the likelihood that the proceeds of such bond sales will be used to pay the principal and interest on the BANs.
Tax Anticipation Notes (TANs) -- TANs are issued by state and local governments to finance the current operations of such governments. Repayment is generally to be derived from specific future tax revenues. TANs are usually general obligations of the issuer. A weakness in an issuer’s capacity to raise taxes due to, among other things, a decline in its tax base or a rise in delinquencies, could adversely affect the issuer’s ability to meet its obligations on outstanding TANs.
Revenue Anticipation Notes (RANs) -- RANs are issued by governments or governmental bodies with the expectation that future revenues from a designated source will be used to repay the notes. In general, they also constitute general obligations of the issuer. A decline in the receipt of projected revenues, such as anticipated revenues from another level of government, could adversely affect an issuer’s ability to meet its obligations on outstanding RANs. In addition, the possibility that the revenues would, when received, be used to meet other obligations could affect the ability of the issuer to pay the principal and interest on RANs.
Construction Loan Notes -- Construction loan notes are issued to provide construction financing for specific projects. Frequently, these notes are redeemed with funds obtained from the Federal Housing Administration.
Bank Notes -- Bank notes are issued by local government bodies and agencies as those described above to commercial banks as evidence of borrowings. The purposes for which the notes are issued are varied, but they are frequently issued to meet short-term working capital or capital-project needs. These notes may have risks similar to the risks associated with TANs and RANs.
28
Tax-Exempt Commercial Paper (Municipal Paper) -- Municipal paper represents very short-term unsecured, negotiable promissory notes issued by states and municipalities and their agencies. Payment of principal and interest on issues of municipal paper may be made from various sources to the extent the funds are available therefrom. Maturities of municipal paper generally will be shorter than the maturities of TANs, BANs or RANs. There is a limited secondary market for issues of municipal paper.
Certain municipal obligations may carry variable or floating rates of interest whereby the rate of interest is not fixed, but varies with changes in specified market rates or indices, such as a bank prime rate or a tax-exempt money market index.
While these various types of notes as a group represent the major portion of the tax-exempt note market, other types of notes are occasionally available in the marketplace and the Fund may invest in such other types of notes to the extent permitted under its investment objective, policies, and limitations. Such notes may be issued for different purposes and may be secured differently from those mentioned above.
Municipal Money Market Funds -- Municipal money market funds are money market funds that pay interest income exempt from regular federal and, in some cases, state and local income taxes. The Fund will bear its proportionate share of the money market fund’s fees and expenses.
The Funds may also invest in the following short-term investments, the income derived from which is generally taxable:
Certificates of Deposit (CDs) -- A certificate of deposit is a negotiable interest bearing instrument with a specific maturity. CDs are issued by banks in exchange for the deposit of funds and normally can be traded in the secondary market prior to maturity. The Fund will only invest in U.S. dollar denominated CDs issued by U.S. banks with assets of $1 billion or more.
Commercial Paper -- Commercial paper is the term used to designate unsecured short-term promissory notes issued by corporations. Maturities on these issues vary from a few days to nine months. Commercial paper may be purchased from U.S. corporations.
Taxable Money Market Funds -- These funds pay interest income that is taxable on the federal and state levels. The Fund will bear its proportionate share of the money market fund’s fees and expenses.
U.S. Government Direct Obligations -- These obligations are issued by the U.S. Treasury and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. They include bills, notes, and bonds. Treasury bills are issued with maturities of up to one year. They are issued in bearer form, are sold on a discount basis and are payable at par value at maturity. Treasury notes are longer-term interest bearing obligations with original maturities of one to seven years. Treasury bonds are longer-term interest-bearing obligations with original maturities from five to thirty years.
U.S. Government Agencies Securities -- Certain federal agencies have been established as instrumentalities of the U.S. Government to supervise and finance certain types of activities. These agencies include, but are not limited to, the Bank for Cooperatives, Federal Land Banks, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Federal Home Loan Banks, Federal National Mortgage Association, Government National Mortgage Association, Export-Import Bank of the United States, and Tennessee Valley Authority. Issues of these agencies, while not direct obligations of the U.S. Government, are either backed by the full faith and credit of the United States or are guaranteed by the Treasury or supported by the issuing agencies’ right to borrow from the Treasury. There can be no assurance that the U.S. Government itself will pay interest and principal on securities as to which it is not legally so obligated.
29
The Municipal Bond Fund reserves the right for liquidity or defensive purposes (such as thinness in the market for municipal securities or an expected substantial decline in value of long-term obligations), to invest temporarily up to 20% of its assets in obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government and its agencies or instrumentalities. Interest on each instrument is taxable for federal income tax purposes and would reduce the amount of tax-free interest payable to shareholders.
Other Corporate Obligations -- The Fund may purchase notes, bonds, and debentures issued by corporations if at the time of purchase there is less than one year remaining until maturity or if they carry a variable or floating rate of interest.
Special Corporate Situation Investments
A Fund may invest a portion of its total assets in securities of companies that may be involved in special corporate situations, the occurrence of which would favorably affect the values of the companies’ equity securities. Such situations could include, among other developments, a change in management or management policies; the acquisition of a significant equity position in the company by an investor or investor group; a merger, a reorganization, or the sale of a division; the spinoff of a subsidiary, division, or other substantial assets; or a third-party or issuer tender offer. The primary risk of this type of investing is that if the contemplated event does not occur or if a proposed transaction is abandoned, revised, or delayed or becomes subject to unanticipated uncertainties, the market price of the securities may decline below the purchase price the Fund paid.
In general, securities that are the subject of a special corporate situation sell at a premium to their market prices immediately following the announcement of the situation. However, the increased market price of these securities may nonetheless represent a discount from what the stated or appraised value of the security would be if the contemplated transaction were approved or consummated. These investments may be advantageous when the following occur: (1) the discount significantly overstates the risk of the contingencies involved; (2) the discount significantly undervalues the securities, assets, or cash to be received by shareholders of the prospective portfolio company as a result of the contemplated transactions; or (3) the discount fails adequately to recognize the possibility that the offer or proposal may be replaced or superseded by an offer or proposal of greater value. The evaluation of these contingencies requires unusually broad knowledge and experience on the part of the Adviser, which must appraise not only the value of the issuer and its component businesses as well as the assets or securities to be received as a result of the contemplated transaction, but also the financial resources and business motivation of the offeror, as well as the dynamics of the business climate when the offer or proposal is in progress.
The Fund’s special corporate situation investments may tend to increase its portfolio turnover ratio and thereby increase brokerage commissions and other transaction expenses. However, the Adviser attempts to select investments of the type described that, in its view, also have a reasonable prospect of significant capital appreciation over the long term.
Standby Commitments
The Funds may obtain standby commitments when it purchases municipal obligations. A standby commitment gives the holder the right to sell the underlying security to the seller at an agreed-upon price on certain dates or within a specified period. The Fund will acquire standby commitments solely to facilitate portfolio liquidity and not with a view to exercising them at a time when the exercise price may exceed the current value of the underlying securities. If the exercise price of a standby commitment held by the Fund should exceed the current value of the underlying securities, the Fund may refrain from exercising the standby commitment in order to avoid causing the issuer of the standby commitment to sustain a loss and thereby jeopardizing the Fund’s business relationship with the issuer. The Fund will enter into standby commitments only with banks and securities dealers that, in the opinion of a sub-adviser, present minimal credit risks. However, if a securities dealer or bank is unable to meet its obligation to repurchase the security when the Fund exercises a standby commitment, the Fund might be unable to recover all or a portion of any loss sustained from having to sell the security elsewhere. Standby commitments will be valued at zero in determining the Fund’s NAV.
30
Structured Notes
The Funds may invest in structured notes, including “total rate of return swaps” with rates of return determined by reference to the total rate of return on one or more loans references in such notes. The rate of return on a structured note may be determined by applying a multiplier to the rate of total return on the referenced loan or loans. Application of a multiplier is comparable to the use of leverage that magnifies the potential for gain and the risk of loss because a relatively small decline in the value of a referenced note could result in a relatively large loss in the value of the structured note.
Subsidiary
A Fund may hold, to a limited extent, investments in certain underlying funds through a wholly-owned and controlled domestic subsidiary of the Fund in order to comply with the limitations of Subchapter M of the Code. The domestic subsidiary is organized under Delaware law as a limited liability company and is classified for federal income tax purposes as an association taxable as a corporation. The Fund would be the sole shareholder of the subsidiary. Shares of a subsidiary are generally not sold or offered to other investors.
Temporary Investments
During periods of adverse market or economic conditions, the Funds may temporarily invest all or a substantial portion of their assets in cash equivalents, high-quality fixed-income securities and money market instruments, and shares of money market mutual funds, or the Funds may hold cash. At such times, the Funds would not be pursuing their stated investment objective with their usual investment strategies. The Funds may also hold these investments for liquidity purposes. Fixed-income securities will be deemed to be of high quality if they are rated “A” or better by S&P or Moody’s or, if unrated, are determined to be of comparable quality by the Adviser. Money market instruments are high-quality, short-term fixed-income obligations (which generally have remaining maturities of one year or less) and may include U.S. government securities, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and banker’s acceptances issued by domestic branches of U.S. banks that are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and repurchase agreements for U.S. government securities. In lieu of purchasing money market instruments, the Funds may purchase shares of money market mutual funds, subject to certain limitations imposed by the 1940 Act. Each Fund, as an investor in a money market fund, will indirectly bear that fund’s fees and expenses, which will be in addition to the fees and expenses of the Fund.
U.S. Government and Agency Bonds
U.S. government and agency bonds represent loans by investors to the U.S. Treasury or a wide variety of government agencies and instrumentalities. Securities issued by most U.S. government entities are neither guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury nor backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. These entities include, among others, the Federal Home Loan Bank, FNMA, and FHLMC. Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and a small number of U.S. government agencies, such as GNMA, are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The market values of U.S. government and agency securities and U.S. Treasury securities are subject to fluctuation.
31
Variable, Floating, and Fixed Rate Debt Obligations
The debt obligations in which a Fund may invest may have variable, floating, or fixed interest rates. Variable rate securities provide for periodic adjustments in the interest rate. Floating rate securities are generally offered at an initial interest rate which is at or above prevailing market rates. The interest rate paid on floating rate securities is then reset periodically (commonly every 90 days) to an increment over some predetermined interest rate index. Commonly utilized indices include the three- month Treasury bill rate, the 180-day Treasury bill rate, the one-month or three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the prime rate of a bank, the commercial paper rates, or the longer- term rates on U.S. Treasury securities. Variable and floating rate securities are relatively long-term instruments that often carry demand features permitting the holder to demand payment of principal at any time or at specified intervals prior to maturity plus accrued interest. In order to most effectively use these securities, the sub-advisers must correctly assess probable movements in interest rates. If such movements are incorrectly forecasted, the Fund could be adversely affected by use of variable and floating rate securities.
Fixed rate securities pay a fixed rate of interest and tend to exhibit more price volatility during times of rising or falling interest rates than securities with variable or floating rates of interest. The value of fixed rate securities will tend to fall when interest rates rise and rise when interest rates fall. The value of variable or floating rate securities, on the other hand, fluctuates much less in response to market interest rate movements than the value of fixed rate securities. This is because variable and floating rate securities behave like short-term instruments in that the rate of interest they pay is subject to periodic adjustments according to a specified formula, usually with reference to some interest rate index or market interest rate. Fixed rate securities with short-term characteristics are not subject to the same price volatility as fixed rate securities without such characteristics. Therefore, they behave more like variable or floating rate securities with respect to price volatility.
When, As and If Issued Securities
The Funds may purchase securities on a “when, as and if issued” basis under which the issuance of the security depends upon the occurrence of a subsequent event, such as approval of a merger, corporate reorganization, leveraged buyout or debt restructuring. The commitment for the purchase of any such security will not be recognized in the portfolio of the Fund until it is determined that issuance of the security is probable. The Fund may purchase securities on such basis without limit. The purchase of securities on a “when, as and if issued” basis may create investment leverage and increase the volatility of the Fund’s NAV. The Fund may also sell securities on a “when, as and if issued” basis provided that the issuance of the security will result automatically from the exchange or conversion of a security owned by the Fund at the time of the sale.
When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Transactions
The Funds may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis. When such a transaction is negotiated, the purchase price is fixed at the time the purchase commitment is entered, but delivery of and payment for the securities take place at a later date. The Fund will not accrue income with respect to securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis prior to their stated delivery date.
The purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis exposes the Fund to risk because the securities may decrease in value prior to delivery. In addition, the Fund’s purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis while remaining substantially fully invested could increase the amount of the Fund’s total assets that are subject to market risk, resulting in increased sensitivity of NAV to changes in market prices. A seller’s failure to deliver securities to the Fund could prevent the Fund from realizing a price or yield considered to be advantageous.
32
When-issued and delayed-delivery securities transactions would be deemed not to involve a senior security (i.e., it would not be considered derivatives transaction or subject to asset segregation requirements), provided that (i) the Fund intends to physically settle the transaction and (ii) the transaction will settle within 35 days of its traded date. If such a transaction were considered to be a derivatives transaction, it would be subject to the requirements of the Derivatives Rule. When the Fund agrees to purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis that will settle 35 days or more after its trade date, the Fund will segregate cash or liquid securities in an amount sufficient to meet the Fund’s purchase commitments. It may be expected that the Fund’s net assets will fluctuate to a greater degree when it sets aside securities to cover such purchase commitments than when it sets aside cash. In addition, because the Fund will set aside cash or liquid securities to satisfy its purchase commitments, its liquidity and the ability of the Adviser to manage it might be affected in the event its commitments to purchase when-issued or delayed delivery securities ever became significant. The Fund will only make commitments to purchase municipal obligations on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis with the intention of actually acquiring the securities, but the Fund reserves the right to sell these securities before the settlement date if it is deemed advisable.
The Fund also may buy when-issued and delayed-delivery securities that settle more than 60 days after purchase. These transactions are called “forwards.” Municipal forwards pay higher interest after settlement than standard bonds, to compensate the buyer for bearing market risk and deferring income during the settlement period, and can often be bought at attractive prices and yields. If the Fund knows that a portfolio bond will, or is likely to, be called or mature on a specific future date, the Fund may buy forwards settling on or about that date to replace the called or maturing bond and “lock in” a currently attractive interest rate.
Yankee Dollar Obligations, Eurobonds, Global Bonds
Certain debt securities may take the forms of Yankee dollar obligations, Eurobonds or global bonds. Yankee dollar obligations are U.S. dollar-denominated obligations issued in the U.S. capital markets by foreign issuers, such as corporations and banks. A Eurobond is a bond issued in a currency other than the currency of the country or market in which it is issued. Global bonds are bonds that can be offered within multiple markets simultaneously. Unlike Eurobonds, global bonds can be issued in the local currency of the country of issuance.
Zero Coupon Bonds
The Funds may invest in zero coupon and step coupon securities. Zero coupon securities pay no cash income to their holders until they mature. When held to maturity, their entire return comes from the difference between their purchase price and their maturity value. Step coupon securities are debt securities that may not pay interest for a specified period of time and then, after the initial period, may pay interest at a series of different rates. Both zero coupon and step coupon securities are issued at substantial discounts from their value at maturity. Because interest on these securities is not paid on a current basis, the values of securities of this type are subject to greater fluctuations than are the value of securities that distribute income regularly and may be more speculative than such securities. Accordingly, the values of these securities may be highly volatile as interest rates rise or fall. In addition, while such securities generate income for purposes of generally accepted accounting standards, they do not generate cash flow and thus could cause the Fund to be forced to liquidate securities at an inopportune time in order to distribute cash, as required by the Code.
33
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
Each Fund has adopted various restrictions on its investment activities, certain of which are fundamental policies and cannot be changed without approval by the holders of a majority of a Fund’s outstanding voting shares, as defined by the 1940 Act. Such a majority means the affirmative vote of the lesser of the holders of (1) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund present at a meeting of shareholders, if the holders of at least 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are present or represented by proxy; or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund. Under its fundamental policies, each Fund may not:
● | Invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the securities of issuers engaged in any single industry or group of industries, provided that this does not apply to U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities, municipal obligations issued by governments or political subdivisions of governments, or securities of other investment companies. |
● | Purchase or sell commodities, except (i) to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended, interpreted from time to time and (ii) that the Fund may purchase and sell securities issued by companies that own or invest in commodities or commodities contracts, commodities contracts relating to financial instruments, such as financial futures contracts and options on such contracts, and swaps. |
● | Purchase or sell real estate or interests therein, or purchase oil, gas, or other mineral leases, rights or royalty contracts or development programs, other than as may be acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments, except that the Fund may invest in the securities of issuers engaged in the foregoing activities and may invest in securities secured by real estate or interests therein. |
● | Issue senior securities as defined by the 1940 Act or borrow money, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time. |
● | Underwrite the securities of other issuers, except to the extent that the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriter in connection with the disposition of portfolio securities. |
● | Make loans of money or securities, except that the Fund may lend money through the purchase of permitted investments, including repurchase agreements, and may lend its portfolio securities in an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of the value of the Fund’s total assets. |
Under its fundamental policies, each Fund other than Defensive Allocation Fund may not:
● | With respect to 75% of its total assets, invest more than 5% of the value of its total assets in the securities of any one issuer or purchase more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer, except that these limitations do not apply to investments in U.S. government securities and securities of other investment companies. |
Under its fundamental policies, the Municipal Bond Fund may not:
● | Under normal market conditions, invest less than 80% of its total assets in municipal securities that pay income that is exempt from regular federal personal income tax. |
34
Certain Funds have adopted the following additional investment restrictions, which are not fundamental and may be changed by the Board without shareholder approval.
Under these restrictions, Equity Allocation Fund may not:
● | Pursuant to Rule 35d-1 under the 1940 Act, change its investment policy of investing at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities without providing 60 days prior notice to shareholders. |
Under these restrictions, Taxable Bond Fund may not:
● | Pursuant to Rule 35d-1 under the 1940 Act, change its investment policy of investing, under normal market conditions, through underlying funds and separately managed accounts, at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in bonds and other fixed income securities without providing 60 days prior notice to shareholders. |
Except with respect to borrowing, all percentage limitations on each Fund’s investment practices set forth in this SAI and in the Prospectus apply at the time of an investment or a transaction, and a subsequent change in percentage resulting from a change in value of the investment or the total value of the Fund’s assets will not constitute a violation of such restriction.
With respect to diversification, each Fund, except for Defensive Allocation Fund, is classified as “diversified” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Defensive Allocation Fund is classified as “non-diversified” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. A non-diversified fund can invest a greater portion of its assets in a single issuer or a limited number of issuers than a diversified fund. As a consequence, a non-diversified fund is subject to greater risk than a diversified fund because losses resulting from an investment in a single issuer may represent a larger portion of the total assets of a non-diversified fund. Under the 1940 Act, the fund may change its classification from non-diversified to diversified without shareholder approval.
With respect to borrowing, the 1940 Act permits a fund to borrow from any bank (including pledging, mortgaging, or hypothecating assets) in an amount up to 33 1/3% of its total assets (not including temporary borrowings not in excess of 5% of its total assets). If at any time, a fund’s borrowings exceed 33 1/3% of the value of the fund’s total assets, the fund will reduce its borrowings within three days (excluding Sundays and holidays) to the extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation. Senior securities (as that term is defined in Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act) may include any obligation or instrument issued by a fund evidencing indebtedness. The 1940 Act generally prohibits funds from issuing senior securities, although it does not treat certain transactions as senior securities, such as certain borrowings, short sales, certain derivative instruments (such as forward and futures contracts and swap agreements), reverse repurchase agreements, firm commitment agreements, and standby commitments, as long as they meet the requirements of the Derivatives Rule or, if applicable, with appropriate earmarking or segregation of assets to cover such obligation.
With respect to concentration, U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities, municipal obligations issued by governments or political subdivisions of governments, and securities of other investment companies are not considered industries. To the extent, however, that the income from a municipal bond is derived from a specific project, the securities will be deemed to be from the industry of that project. Each Fund will endeavor to consider the concentration of the underlying funds in which it may invest when determining compliance with its concentration policy.
35
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS
Board Responsibilities
The Board has the overall responsibility for monitoring the operations of the Trust and the Funds. The officers of the Trust are responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of the Trust and the Funds. The Board has approved contracts under which certain companies provide essential management services to the Trust. The Board has the responsibility for supervising the services provided by those companies.
Like most mutual funds, the day-to-day business of the Trust, including the management of risk, is performed by third party service providers, such as the Adviser, sub-advisers, principal underwriter, administrator, and transfer agent. The Trustees are responsible for overseeing the Trust’s service providers and, thus, have oversight responsibility with respect to risk management performed by those service providers. Risk management seeks to identify and address risks – that is, events or circumstances that could have material adverse effects on the business, operations, shareholder services, investment performance, or reputation of the Fund. The Funds and their service providers employ a variety of processes, procedures and controls to identify those possible events or circumstances, to lessen the probability of their occurrence, and/or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur. Each service provider is responsible for one or more discrete aspects of the Trust’s business (for example, the Adviser and sub-advisers are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio investments) and, consequently, for managing the risks associated with that business. The Board and the Adviser have emphasized to the Funds’ service providers the importance of maintaining vigorous risk management.
The Trustees’ role in risk oversight begins before the inception of the Funds, at which time certain of the Funds’ service providers present the Board with information concerning the investment objectives, strategies, and risks of the Funds, as well as proposed investment limitations for the Funds. Additionally, the Funds’ Adviser and sub-advisers provide the Board with an overview of, among other things, its investment philosophy, brokerage practices and compliance infrastructure. Thereafter, the Board continues its oversight function as various personnel, including the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, as well as personnel of the Adviser, sub-advisers, and other service providers, such as the Funds’ independent accountants, make periodic reports to the Board with respect to various aspects of risk management. The Board oversees efforts by management and service providers to manage risks to which the Funds may be exposed.
The Board is responsible for overseeing the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by the Adviser and the sub-advisers and receives information about those services at its regular meetings. In addition, on an annual basis after the initial two-year term, the Board considers whether to renew the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and the Board meets with the Adviser and sub-advisers to review such services. Among other things, the Board regularly considers the Adviser’s and sub-advisers’ adherence to the Funds’ investment restrictions and compliance with various policies and procedures of the Funds and with applicable securities regulations. The Board also reviews information about the Funds’ investments, including, for example, portfolio holdings schedules and reports on the use of specific types of securities in managing the Funds.
The Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer reports regularly to the Board to review and discuss compliance issues. At least annually, the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer provides the Board with a report reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Trust’s policies and procedures and those of certain service providers. The report addresses (i) the operation of the policies and procedures of the Trust and each service provider since the date of the last report, (ii) any material changes to the policies and procedures since the date of the last report, (iii) any recommendations for material changes to the policies and procedures, and (iv) any material compliance matters since the date of the last report.
36
The Board receives reports from the Funds’ service providers regarding operational risks and risks related to the valuation and liquidity of portfolio securities. The Trust’s Valuation Committee reports to the Board concerning investments for which market quotations are not readily available, if any. Annually, the independent registered public accounting firm reviews with the Board’s Audit Committee its audit of the Funds’ financial statements, focusing on major areas of risk encountered by the Funds and noting any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Funds’ internal controls. Additionally, in connection with its oversight function, the Board oversees management’s implementation of disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in its periodic reports with the SEC are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the required time periods. The Board also oversees the Trust’s internal controls over financial reporting, which comprise policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Trust’s financial reporting and the preparation of the Trust’s financial statements.
From its review of these reports and discussions with the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, Adviser, sub-advisers, independent registered public accounting firm, and other service providers, the Board and the Audit Committee learn in detail about the material risks of the Funds, thereby facilitating a dialogue about how management and service providers identify and mitigate those risks.
The Board recognizes that not all risks that may affect the Funds can be identified and/or quantified, that it may not be practical or cost-effective to eliminate or mitigate certain risks, that it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment-related risks) to achieve the Funds’ goals, and that the processes, procedures and controls employed to address certain risks may be limited in their effectiveness. Moreover, reports received by the Trustees as to risk management matters are typically summaries of the relevant information. Most of the Funds’ investment management and business affairs are carried out by or through the Funds’ Adviser and other service providers, each of which has an independent interest in risk management but whose policies and the methods by which one or more risk management functions are carried out may differ from the Funds’ and each other’s in the setting of priorities, available resources, or the effectiveness of relevant controls. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, the Board’s ability to monitor and manage risk, as a practical matter, is subject to limitations.
Members and Structure of the Board
There are three members of the Board, each of whom is not an “interested person” of the Trust, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act (“Independent Trustees”). Robert Wagman serves as Chairman of the Board. The Board has one standing committee, the Audit Committee, which is responsible for advising the Board with respect to accounting, auditing, and financial matters affecting the Trust. The Audit Committee also serves as the Trust’s Qualified Legal Compliance Committee, which provides a mechanism for reporting legal violations. The Audit Committee is chaired by an Independent Trustee and composed entirely of Independent Trustees. The Audit Committee met twice during the Trust’s most recent fiscal year. In addition, the Board oversees the Trust’s Valuation Committee, whose actions are reported to the Board at least quarterly and more frequently, if appropriate.
The Trust has determined its leadership structure is appropriate given the specific characteristics and circumstances of the Trust including, among other things, the fact that the Independent Trustees constitute 100% of the Board, the anticipated amount of assets under management in the Trust, the number of funds and share classes overseen by the Board, the Trust’s policies and procedures as well as those of its service providers, and the experience and qualifications of its members. The Board also believes that its leadership structure facilitates the orderly and efficient flow of information to the Independent Trustees from management.
37
Set forth below are the names, ages, positions with the Trust, length of term of office, and the principal occupations and other directorships held during at least the last five years of each of the persons currently serving as a Trustee of the Trust, as well as information about each officer of the Trust. The business address of each Trustee and officer is 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 90025.
Independent Trustees | |||||
Name and Age | Position(s) Held With the Trust |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupations During Past Five Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |
Other Directorships Held by Trustee During Past Five Years |
Michael D. LeRoy Age 77 |
Trustee | Indefinite; since 2012 |
Principal, Crown Capital Advisors LLC (2000-present) | 4 | Member Board of Directors and Chairman of the Board, The Rockport Company, LLC (2017-2019) |
Robert D. Taylor Age 64 |
Trustee | Indefinite; since 2012 |
Partner, Centinela Capital Partners, LLC (2006-present) | 4 | None |
Robert M. Wagman Age 73 |
Trustee/Chairman | Indefinite; since 2013 |
Retired (2015-present); Managing Director of Investment Management Services, Aspiriant, LLC (2013-2015) | 4 | None |
38
Officers | |||
Name and Age | Position(s) Held With the Trust |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupations During Past Five Years |
Robert J. Francais Age 59 |
President | Indefinite; since 2013 |
Chief Executive Officer, Aspiriant, LLC (2010-present), Chief Operating Officer, Aspiriant, LLC (2008-2009) |
John D. Allen Age 54 |
Vice President | Indefinite; since 2014 |
Chief Investment Officer, Aspiriant, LLC (2014-present); Client Relationship Manager, Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo (2009-2014) |
Douglas S. Hendrickson Age 55 |
Treasurer | Indefinite; since 2016 |
Chief Financial Officer, Aspiriant, LLC (2016-present); Acting Chief Financial Officer, Cetera Financial Group (2016-2016); Group Chief Financial Officer, Investor Services Division, Charles Schwab (2013-2015); Head of Corporate Planning, Profitability Analysis and Management Reporting, Charles Schwab (2011-2013) |
Benjamin D. Schmidt Age 48 |
Assistant Treasurer; Secretary; Chief Compliance Officer; Anti-Money Laundering Officer |
Indefinite; since 2015 |
Director, Aspiriant, LLC (2015-present) |
Laura Boucher Age 44 |
Assistant Treasurer; Assistant Secretary | Indefinite; since 2023 |
Senior Manager, Fund Administration, Aspiriant, LLC (2015-present) |
Individual Trustee Qualifications
The Board has concluded that each of the Trustees should serve on the Board because of his ability to review and understand information about the Trust provided by management, to identify and request other information deemed relevant to the performance of duties as a trustee, to question management and other service providers regarding material factors bearing on the management and administration of the Funds, and to exercise business judgment in a manner that serves the best interests of the Trust’s shareholders. The Board has concluded that each of the Trustees should serve as a Trustee based on his own experience, qualifications, attributes and skills as described below.
The Board has concluded that Mr. LeRoy should serve as Trustee because of his background in business and accounting, his knowledge of the mutual fund industry, and his experience as a trustee of other investment companies.
39
The Board has concluded that Mr. Taylor should serve as Trustee because of his extensive business and investment industry experience, legal background, and financial accounting expertise.
The Board has concluded that Mr. Wagman should serve as Trustee because of his background in business and accounting and his knowledge of the investment management industry.
In its periodic assessment of the effectiveness of the Board, the Board considers the complementary individual skills and experience of the individual Trustees primarily in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition so that the Board, as a body, possesses the appropriate (and appropriately diverse) skills and experience to oversee the business of the Trust.
Ownership of Fund Shares
The following table shows the dollar range of each Trustee’s beneficial ownership of shares of the Funds as of December 31, 2024:
Name | Fund Name | Dollar Range of Fund Shares | Aggregate Dollar Range of Shares in all Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in Family of Investment Companies |
Michael D. LeRoy | Equity Allocation Fund | NONE | NONE |
Municipal Bond Fund | NONE | ||
Defensive Allocation Fund | NONE | ||
Taxable Bond Fund | NONE | ||
Robert D. Taylor | Equity Allocation Fund | NONE | NONE |
Municipal Bond Fund | NONE | ||
Defensive Allocation Fund | NONE | ||
Taxable Bond Fund | NONE | ||
Robert Wagman | Equity Allocation Fund | OVER $100,000 | OVER $100,000 |
Municipal Bond Fund | OVER $100,000 | ||
Defensive Allocation Fund | OVER $100,000 | ||
Taxable Bond Fund | OVER $100,000 |
40
As of July 7, 2025, the Trustees and officers as a group owned less than 1% of the shares of any class of a Fund.
Compensation
Effective April 1, 2025, each Trustee is paid an annual $95,000 retainer, as well as an additional payment for (i) each telephonic meeting of the Trust’s Board that he or she attends and (ii) any other telephonic communication for which the Independent Trustees approve such payment. From April 1, 2024 through March 31, 2025, the annual retainer was $90,000. The Chair of the Board is paid an additional $5,000 per year. Each Trustee who is a member of Audit Committee is paid an additional $2,000 per year. The Chair of the Audit Committee is paid an additional $8,000 per year. The following table shows the compensation paid to each Independent Trustee for the Trust’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2025:
Name | Aggregate Compensation |
Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of Fund Expenses |
Estimated Annual Benefits Upon Retirement |
Total Compensation from Trust and Fund Complex* |
Michael D. LeRoy | $103,000 | -- | -- | $103,000 |
Robert D. Taylor | $95,000 | -- | -- | $95,000 |
Robert M. Wagman | $100,000 | -- | -- | $100,000 |
* | The Trust is the only registered investment company in the “Fund Complex”. |
CODES OF ETHICS
The Trust, Adviser, sub-advisers, and principal underwriter have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act, which governs personal securities trading by their respective personnel. Each Code of Ethics permits such individuals to purchase and sell securities, including securities that are purchased, sold, or held by the Funds, but only subject to certain conditions designed to ensure that purchases and sales by such individuals do not adversely affect the Funds’ investment activities.
INVESTMENT ADVISER
The Adviser is employee owned and no employee has a controlling ownership interest in the Adviser. The Adviser provides investment advisory services to each Fund pursuant to the terms of an investment advisory agreement between the Adviser and the Trust. The agreement has an initial two-year term and may be continued in effect from year to year thereafter with the approval of (1) the Board or (2) vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Fund (as defined by the 1940 Act), provided that in either event the continuance must also be approved by a majority of the Independent Trustees, by vote cast at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval in accordance with the 1940 Act. The agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its assignment, as defined in the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder. For the services it provides pursuant to the advisory agreement, the Adviser is entitled to a fee calculated at an annual rate based on each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser is responsible for paying the sub-advisers for their services to a Fund, if applicable.
Equity Allocation Fund. For the services it provides to the Fund, the Adviser is entitled to an advisory fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.24% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser, however, has contractually agreed to waive its advisory fee from 0.24% to 0.16% through July 31, 2026. Therefore, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser in the amount of $2,195,917, $2,300,518, and $2,404,534, respectively, after the Adviser waived $1,097,962, $1,150,636, and $1,202,295, respectively, of the accrued advisory fees from the Fund. This fee waiver arrangement may be terminated only by the Trust’s Board of Trustees.
41
Municipal Bond Fund. For the services it provides to the Fund, the Adviser is entitled to an advisory fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.27% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser, however, has contractually agreed to waive its advisory fee from 0.27% to 0.21% through July 31, 2026. Therefore, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser in the amount of $2,658,502, $2,261,754, and $2,032,383, respectively, after the Adviser waived $759,572, $646,213, and $580,680, respectively, of the accrued advisory fees from the Fund. This fee waiver arrangement may be terminated only by the Trust’s Board of Trustees.
Defensive Allocation Fund. For the services it provides to the Fund, the Adviser is entitled to an advisory fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.10% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser in the amount of $1,084,492, $1,330,354, and $1,361,765, respectively.
Taxable Bond Fund. For the services it provides to the Fund, the Adviser is entitled to an advisory fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser, however, has contractually agreed to waive its advisory fee from 0.25% to 0.08% through July 31, 2026. Therefore, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Fund paid advisory fees to the Adviser in the amount of $235,556, $174,327, and $149,593, respectively, after the Adviser waived $500,558, $370,446, $317,884, respectively, of the accrued advisory fees from the Fund. This fee waiver arrangement may be terminated only by the Trust’s Board of Trustees.
Pursuant to an administrative services agreement with the Trust, the Adviser is entitled to a fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.10% of each Fund’s average daily net assets for providing administrative services to the Funds. Such services include the review of shareholder reports and other filings with the SEC; oversight and management of the Fund’s primary service providers; periodic due diligence reviews of the Funds’ primary service providers; coordination and negotiation of all of the contracts and pricing relating to the Fund’s primary service providers; providing information to the Independent Trustees relating to the review and selection of the Funds’ primary service providers; coordination of quarterly and special board meetings; and all such other duties or services necessary for the appropriate administration of the Funds. The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive administrative services fees from 0.10% to 0.05%, 0.04%, 0.02%, and 0.04%, for the Equity Allocation Fund, Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund, and Taxable Bond Fund, respectively, through July 31, 2026. This fee waiver arrangement may be terminated only by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. From November 7, 2019 through July 31, 2024, the Adviser waived administrative services fees from 0.10% to 0.04%, 0.03%, 0.01%, and 0.03%, for the Equity Allocation Fund, Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund, respectively.
For the administrative services it provided during fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Adviser was paid $640,139, $464,422, $178,105, and $108,215 by the Equity Allocation Fund, Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund, and Taxable Bond Fund, respectively, after waiving $732,310, $801,531, $906,387, and $186,231, respectively, of the accrued administrative services fees. For the administrative services it provided during fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, the Adviser was paid $575,193, $323,104, $133,034, and $65,372 by the Equity Allocation Fund, Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund, and Taxable Bond Fund, respectively, after waiving $862,785, $753,920, $1,197,320, and $152,537, respectively, of the accrued administrative services fees. For the administrative services it provided during fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, the Adviser was paid $601,138, $290,340, $136,175, and $56,097 by the Equity Allocation Fund, Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund, and Taxable Bond Fund, respectively, after waiving $901,707, $677,460, $1,225,590, and $130,894, respectively, of the accrued administrative services fees.
42
Pursuant to an exemptive order from the SEC and subject to certain conditions, including Board approval, the Adviser may hire an unaffiliated sub-adviser for a Fund or materially amend a sub-advisory agreement with a Fund’s unaffiliated sub-adviser without obtaining shareholder approval. Within 90 days of retaining a new sub-adviser or materially amending a sub-advisory agreement, shareholders of the Fund will receive notification of the change. This manager of managers arrangement enables a Fund to operate with greater efficiency and without incurring the expense and delay associated with obtaining shareholder approval of sub-advisory agreements. The arrangement does not permit aggregate investment advisory fees paid by the Fund to be increased or change the Adviser’s obligations under the advisory agreement with the Trust without shareholder approval. The Adviser has ultimate responsibility, subject to oversight by the Board, to oversee the sub-advisers and recommend their hiring, termination, and replacement.
INVESTMENT SUB-ADVISERS
Each sub-adviser provides investment sub-advisory services to the Fund pursuant to the terms of an investment sub-advisory agreement between the Adviser and the respective sub-adviser. Each agreement has an initial two-year term and may be continued in effect from year to year thereafter with the approval of (1) the Board or (2) vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund (as defined by the 1940 Act), provided that in either event the continuance must also be approved by a majority of the Independent Trustees, by vote cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. Each agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its assignment, as defined in the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder.
Allspring Investments is a direct and wholly-owned subsidiary of Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC, a holding company owned by certain private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. Allspring Investments provides sub-advisory services to the Municipal Bond Fund. For the services provided pursuant to its sub-advisory agreement, Allspring Investments is entitled to a fee at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets of the Municipal Bond Fund that Allspring Investments manages.
Aperio is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. Aperio provides sub-advisory services to the Equity Allocation Fund. For the services provided pursuant to its sub-advisory agreement, Aperio is entitled to a fee at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets allocated to the Equity Allocation Fund’s strategy that Aperio manages.
GMO is an independent private company owned by its active and retired partners. GMO provides sub-advisory services to the Equity Allocation Fund. For the services provided pursuant to its sub-advisory agreement, GMO is entitled to a fee at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets allocated to the Equity Allocation Fund’s strategy that GMO manages.
MacKay Shields is a wholly-owned subsidiary of New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of New York Life Insurance Company. MacKay Shields provides sub-advisory services to the Municipal Bond Fund. For the services provided pursuant to its sub-advisory agreement, MacKay Shields is entitled to a fee at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets of the Municipal Bond Fund that MacKay Shields manages.
Nuveen is a subsidiary of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC, which is a subsidiary of Nuveen, LLC, the investment management arm of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”). For the services provided pursuant to its sub-advisory agreement, Nuveen is entitled to a fee at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets of the Municipal Bond Fund that Nuveen manages.
43
Wellington’s ultimate parent company is Wellington Management Group LLP, a Massachusetts private limited liability partnership. Wellington provides sub-advisory services to the Equity Allocation Fund. For the services provided pursuant to its sub-advisory agreement, Wellington is entitled to a fee at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets allocated to the Equity Allocation Fund’s strategy that Wellington manages.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Adviser paid, in the aggregate, $1,393,309 to the sub-advisers for the services they provided to the Equity Allocation Fund, which represents an annual rate of 0.10% based on average daily net assets. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, the Adviser paid, in the aggregate, $1,320,457 to the sub-advisers for the services they provided to the Equity Allocation Fund, which represents an annual rate of 0.09% based on average daily net assets. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, the Adviser paid, in the aggregate, $1,276,938 to the sub-advisers for the services they provided to the Equity Allocation Fund, which represents an annual rate of 0.08% based on average daily net assets.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Adviser paid, in the aggregate, $2,150,373 to the sub-advisers for the services they provided to the Municipal Bond Fund, which represents an annual rate of 0.17% based on average daily net assets. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, the Adviser paid, in the aggregate, $1,851,304 to the sub-advisers for the services they provided to the Municipal Bond Fund, which represents an annual rate of 0.17% based on average daily net assets. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, the Adviser paid, in the aggregate, $1,701,051 to the sub-advisers for the services they provided to the Municipal Bond Fund, which represents an annual rate of 0.18% based on average daily net assets.
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
Other Accounts Managed
The following tables provides information about other accounts managed by the Funds’ portfolio managers as of March 31, 2025.
ASPIRIANT | Total Accounts | Accounts With Performance-Based Fees | ||
Portfolio Manager | Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Number | Assets (in Millions) |
John Allen | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 2 | $316 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Marc Castellani | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 2 | $316 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
44
ALLSPRING INVESTMENTS | Total Accounts | Accounts With Performance-Based Fees | ||
Portfolio Manager | Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Robert Miller | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 7 | $16,201 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 13 | $3,593 | 0 | $0 |
Nicholas Venditti | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 11 | $19,636 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 48 | $8,411 | 0 | $0 |
Terry J. Goode | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 10 | $16,370 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 8 | $1,532 | 0 | $0 |
APERIO | Total Accounts | Accounts With Performance-Based Fees | ||
Portfolio Manager | Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Ran Leshem | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 3 | $653 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 14 | $1,809 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 26,814 | $110,494 | 0 | $0 |
Brian Ko | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 3 | $653 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 14 | $1,809 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 26,814 | $110,494 | 0 | $0 |
Michael Branch | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 3 | $653 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 14 | $1,809 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 26,814 | $110,494 | 0 | $0 |
Willie Kwan | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 3 | $653 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 14 | $1,809 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 26,814 | $110,494 | 0 | $0 |
45
GMO | Total Accounts | Accounts With Performance-Based Fees | ||
Portfolio Manager | Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Tom Hancock | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 8 | $14,542 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 10 | $6,389 | 1 | $111 |
Other Accounts | 27 | $12,032 | 3 | $1,259 |
Anthony Hene | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 4 | $12,063 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 4 | $5,717 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 22 | $11,205 | 2 | $1,198 |
Ty Cobb | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 4 | $12,063 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 4 | $5,717 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 22 | $11,205 | 2 | $1,198 |
MACKAY SHIELDS | Total Accounts | Accounts With Performance-Based Fees | ||
Portfolio Manager | Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Michael Denlinger | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 21 | $29,736 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 7 | $10,158 | 2 | $845 |
Other Accounts | 95 | $26,900 | 1 | $588 |
Robert DiMella | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 20 | $39,405 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 7 | $10,158 | 2 | $845 |
Other Accounts | 95 | $26,900 | 1 | $588 |
46
NUVEEN | Total Accounts | Accounts With Performance-Based Fees | ||
Portfolio Manager | Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Daniel J. Close | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 19 | $31,956 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 2 | $482 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 49 | $17,678 | 0 | $0 |
Paul L. Brennan | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 17 | $29,332 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 1 | $47 | 0 | $0 |
Stephen Candido | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 31 | $55,436 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 2 | $482 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 3 | $201 | 0 | $0 |
WELLINGTON | Total Accounts | Accounts With Performance-Based Fees | ||
Portfolio Manager | Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Number | Assets (in Millions) |
Steven C. Angeli | ||||
Registered Investment Companies | 1 | $42 | 0 | $0 |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles | 10 | $7,749 | 0 | $0 |
Other Accounts | 32 | $14,976 | 3 | $2,492 |
Portfolio Manager Compensation
Aspiriant. John Allen and Marc Castellani are compensated with base compensation, bonus (a percentage of base compensation), and a share purchase incentive (bonus based on percentage of profit of the Adviser divided by shareholders per capita).
Allspring Investments. The compensation structure for Allspring Investments’ portfolio managers includes a competitive fixed base salary plus variable incentives, payable annually and over a deferred period. Allspring Investments participates in third party investment management compensation surveys for market-based compensation information to help support individual pay decisions and to ensure compensation is aligned with the marketplace. In addition to surveys, Allspring Investments also considers prior professional experience, tenure, seniority and a portfolio manager's team size, scope and assets under management when determining his/her total compensation. In addition, portfolio managers, who meet the eligibility requirements, may participate in Allspring Investments’ 401(k) plan that features a limited matching contribution. Eligibility for and participation in this plan is on the same basis for all employees.
Allspring Investments’ investment incentive program plays an important role in aligning the interests of our portfolio managers, investment team members, clients and shareholders. Incentive awards for portfolio managers are determined based on a review of relative investment and business/team performance. Investment performance is generally evaluated for 1, 3, and 5- year performance results, with a predominant weighting on the 3- and 5- year time periods, versus the relevant benchmarks and/or peer groups consistent with the investment style. Once determined, incentives are awarded to portfolio managers annually, with a portion awarded as annual cash and a portion awarded as deferred incentive. The long-term portion of incentives generally carry a pro-rated vesting schedule over a three-year period. For many of our portfolio managers, Allspring Investments further requires a portion of their annual long-term award be allocated directly into each strategy they manage through a deferred compensation vehicle. In addition, our investment team members who are eligible for long term awards also have the opportunity to invest up to 100% of their awards into investment strategies they support (through a deferred compensation vehicle).
47
As an independent firm, approximately 20% of Allspring Group Holdings, LLC (of which Allspring Investments is a subsidiary) is owned by employees, including portfolio managers.
Aperio. Aperio seeks to provide a competitive base salary plus bonus system of compensation for all employees. Bonus awards are highly dependent on overall firm profitability and individual contribution and are awarded annually. In addition, the firm provides additional long-term compensation for key staff members. As an index firm, compensation is not linked to portfolio performance. Portfolio managers also receive health insurance, vision and retirement plan benefits (i.e., 401(k) plan matching) in the same manner as all other salaried employees.
GMO. The compensation of each portfolio manager consists of a fixed annual base salary and a discretionary bonus and, in the case of portfolio managers who are partners, a partnership interest in the firm’s profits. Base salary is determined by taking into account current industry norms and market data to ensure that GMO pays a competitive base salary. The discretionary bonus is paid on the basis of a number of factors, including features designed to align the compensation of the portfolio managers with the performance of the accounts they manage, such as the Fund, over various periods. The performance of the Fund relative to an index (which may or may not be the Fund’s benchmark) may be considered. Such features are intended to promote a closer alignment of interests between those accounts and the portfolio managers managing those accounts. Individual portfolio managers may, however, have some or all of the same economic incentives that GMO itself may have when GMO is eligible to earn a performance fee. Specifically, even if GMO is not earning or eligible to earn a performance fee, individual portfolio managers may have compensation-related incentives to make riskier investments, pursue riskier strategies, seek less downside risk when the Fund has outperformed its benchmark and allocate superior investment ideas to GMO client accounts capable of generating higher performance-related compensation. The level of partnership interest is determined by taking into account the individual’s contribution to GMO. Because each portfolio manager’s compensation is based, in part, on his or her individual performance, GMO does not have a typical percentage split among base salary, bonus and other compensation.
MacKay Shields. Salaries are set by reference to a range of factors, taking into account each individual’s seniority and responsibilities and the market rate of pay for the relevant position. Annual salaries are set at competitive levels to attract and maintain the best professional talent. Variable or incentive compensation, both cash bonus and deferred awards, are a significant component of total compensation for portfolio managers at MacKay Shields. Incentive compensation received by portfolio managers is generally based on both quantitative and qualitative factors. The quantitative factors may include, but are not limited to: (i) investment performance; (ii) assets under management; (iii) revenues and profitability; and (iv) industry benchmarks. The qualitative factors may include, among others, leadership, adherence to the firm’s policies and procedures, and contribution to the firm’s goals and objectives. Deferred awards are provided to attract, retain, motivate and reward key personnel. As such, MacKay Shields maintains a phantom equity plan and awards vest and pay out after three years. Thus, portfolio managers share in the results and success of the firm with the receipt of an award from the phantom equity plan. This approach instills a strong sense of commitment towards the overall success of the firm. MacKay Shields maintains an employee benefit program, including health and non-health insurance, education reimbursement, and a 401(k) defined contribution plan for all of its employees regardless of their job title, responsibilities or seniority.
48
Nuveen. Nuveen’s philosophy is to provide performance-based and market-competitive compensation, while mitigating inappropriate or excessive risk taking. There are four primary components of compensation: (1) base and benefits, (2) annual cash award, (3) annual Long-Term Performance Plan (“LTPP” award), and (4) equity-like profit sharing plans, including fund alignment plans, with the latter two components applicable to eligible participants.
Base pay is determined based upon an analysis of the employee’s general performance, experience, and market levels of base pay for such positions. Base salary and annual variable compensation targets are reviewed annually, while other benefit plans are periodically reviewed to ensure competitiveness.
Individual variable compensation awards are determined based on several factors, including Nuveen’s total variable compensation pool, the portion of the pool allocated to a business/area, an employee’s performance rating, and employee performance and compensation relative to internal peers and external market.
Employee performance determination includes both subjective and objective criteria. Objective criteria places emphasis on sustained, long-term performance. The subjective portion of the incentive compensation is based on a qualitative evaluation made by each investment professional's supervisor taking into consideration a number of factors, including the investment professional's team collaboration, expense management, support of personnel responsible for asset growth, and his or her compliance with Nuveen’s policies and procedures.
The annual variable compensation award is split between an annual cash award and an LTPP award. The proportion of variable compensation that is awarded in the form of an LTPP award increases as an employee’s total direct compensation, inclusive of base salary and annual variable compensation, increases. Investment professionals are eligible for annual variable compensation based on their investment performance, qualitative evaluation and financial performance of Nuveen and our parent organization, TIAA. The LTPP award links employee compensation to the achievement of the organization’s long-term business goals. Awards under the LTPP are determined as dollar amounts and granted as units (“Performance Units”) at the end of February in the year following the relevant performance year. Performance Units vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date and are settled in cash upon vesting.
Eligible senior employees participate in equity-like profits interests’ and fund alignment plans, which provide a meaningful opportunity to participate in the long-term success of the business. These profits interests vest over time and entitle participants to a percentage of business profitability / fund performance, ensuring a strong alignment of interests with the firm's clients over the long term. The profits interests are designed to provide senior personnel with strong incentives to remain with the firm and participate in its success including non-compete and non-solicitation terms. Additional details regarding the program are proprietary.
Wellington. Wellington receives a fee based on the assets under management of the Fund as set forth in the sub-advisory agreement between Wellington and the Adviser on behalf of the Fund. Wellington compensates its investment professionals out of its total revenues, including the advisory fees earned with respect to the Fund.
49
Wellington’s compensation structure is designed to attract and retain high-caliber investment professionals necessary to deliver high-quality investment management services to its clients. Wellington’s compensation of the Fund’s manager listed in the Prospectus who is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Equity Allocation Fund (the “Investment Professional”) includes a base salary and incentive components. The base salary for each investment professional who is a partner (a “Partner”) of Wellington Management Group LLP, the ultimate holding company of Wellington, is generally a fixed amount that is determined by the managing partners of Wellington Management Group LLP. The Investment Professional is eligible to receive an incentive payment based on the revenues earned by Wellington from the Fund and generally each other account managed by such Investment Professional. The Investment Professional’s incentive payment relating to the Fund is linked to the gross pre-tax performance of the portion of the Fund managed by the Investment Professional compared to the MSCI All Country World Index over one, three and five year periods, with an emphasis on five year results. Wellington applies similar incentive compensation structures (although the benchmarks or peer groups, time periods and rates may differ) to other accounts managed by investment professionals, including accounts with performance fees.
Portfolio-based incentives across all accounts managed by an investment professional can, and typically do, represent a significant portion of an investment professional’s overall compensation; incentive compensation varies significantly by individual and can vary significantly from year to year. The Investment Professional may also be eligible for bonus payments based on his overall contribution to Wellington’s business operations. Senior management at Wellington may reward individuals as it deems appropriate based on other factors. Each Partner is eligible to participate in a Partner-funded tax qualified retirement plan, the contributions to which are made pursuant to an actuarial formula. Mr. Angeli is a Partner.
Material Conflicts of Interest
Aspiriant. While the compensation of portfolio managers is not tied to the performance of a Fund, the portfolio managers’ management of other accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in connection with their management of a Fund’s investments, on the one hand, and the investments of the other accounts, on the other. The other accounts may have the same investment objective as the Fund. Therefore, a potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the identical investment objectives, whereby the portfolio manager could favor one account over another. Another potential conflict could include the portfolio managers’ knowledge about the size, timing and possible market impact of Fund trades, whereby the portfolio manager could use this information to the advantage of other accounts and to the disadvantage of the Fund. However, the Adviser has established policies and procedures to ensure that the purchase and sale of securities among all accounts it manages are fairly and equitably allocated. The Adviser’s trade allocation policy is to aggregate client transactions, including the Fund’s, where possible when it is believed that such aggregation may facilitate the Adviser’s duty of best execution. Client accounts for which orders are aggregated receive the average price of such transaction. Any transaction costs incurred in the transaction are shared pro rata based on each client’s participation in the transaction. The Adviser generally allocates securities among client accounts according to each account’s pre-determined participation in the transaction. The Adviser’s policy prohibits any allocation of trades that would favor any proprietary accounts, affiliated accounts, or any particular client(s) or group of clients more over any other account(s). The Adviser prohibits late trading, frequent trading and/or market timing in the Funds and monitors trades daily to ensure this policy is not violated.
Allspring Investments. Allspring Investments’ portfolio managers often provide investment management for separate accounts advised in the same or similar investment style as that provided to mutual funds. While management of multiple accounts could potentially lead to conflicts of interest over various issues such as trade allocation, fee disparities and research acquisition, Allspring Investments has implemented policies and procedures for the express purpose of ensuring that clients are treated fairly and that potential conflicts of interest are minimized.
50
The portfolio managers face inherent conflicts of interest in their day-to-day management of the Funds and other accounts because the Fund may have different investment objectives, strategies and risk profiles than the other accounts managed by the portfolio managers. For instance, to the extent that the portfolio managers manage accounts with different investment strategies than the Fund, they may from time to time be inclined to purchase securities, including initial public offerings, for one account but not for a Fund. Additionally, some of the accounts managed by the portfolio managers may have different fee structures, including performance fees, which are or have the potential to be higher or lower, in some cases significantly higher or lower, than the fees paid by the Funds. The differences in fee structures may provide an incentive to the portfolio managers to allocate more favorable trades to the higher-paying accounts.
To minimize the effects of these inherent conflicts of interest, Allspring Investments has adopted and implemented policies and procedures, including brokerage and trade allocation policies and procedures, believed to address the potential conflicts associated with managing portfolios for multiple clients and are designed to ensure that all clients are treated fairly and equitably. Accordingly, security block purchases are allocated to all accounts with similar objectives in a fair and equitable manner. Furthermore, Allspring Investments has adopted a Code of Ethics under Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and Rule 204A-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) to address potential conflicts associated with managing the Funds and any personal accounts the portfolio managers may maintain.
Aperio. Aperio manages portfolios for many different clients and, as a registered investment advisor, has a fiduciary duty to place its clients’ interests ahead of its own and not to favor one client over another. To balance any competing interests that may exist, the procedures for managing portfolios are applied consistently across all portfolios. Aperio manages all portfolios separately, generally transacts only in liquid securities, and does not participate in Initial Public Offerings. In addition, Aperio does not receive incentive-based fees on any account.
Aperio rebalances each separately managed account individually. Accounts are selected for rebalancing based on pre-defined criteria. The prioritization of when accounts are rebalanced is determined by the requirements of each portfolio, including, for example, the need to manage cash flows into and out of a portfolio, reinvest cash from income and corporate actions, tax considerations, changes in portfolio composition due to screening and opportunities for improvement in tracking error relative to the benchmark consistent with account objectives and guidelines. Although each client account is individually rebalanced, Aperio will often transact in the same securities across several client accounts. Aperio will aggregate contemporaneous transactions with the same executing broker in the same securities. Aperio aggregates trades at regular intervals throughout the day and considers all trades in a particular interval to be contemporaneous. When it does so, participating accounts are allocated the resulting securities or proceeds (and related transaction expenses) on an average execution price basis. For clients with different executing brokers, Aperio employs a random executing broker rotation to determine trade order.
Aperio also monitors the securities transactions of each company employee in order to evaluate potential conflicts of interest with clients in connection with an employee’s personal trading activities.
Because Aperio is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BlackRock, the investment activities of BlackRock for its proprietary accounts and for client accounts may also limit the investment strategies and rights of the Fund. For example, in certain circumstances where the Fund invests in securities issued by companies that operate in certain regulated industries, in certain emerging or international markets, or are subject to corporate or regulatory ownership restrictions, or invest in certain futures and derivative transactions, there may be limits on the aggregate amount invested by BlackRock for its proprietary accounts and for client accounts (including the Fund) that may not be exceeded without the grant of a license or other regulatory or corporate consent, or, if exceeded, may cause BlackRock, the Funds or other client accounts to suffer disadvantages or business restrictions. If certain aggregate ownership thresholds are reached or certain transactions undertaken, the ability of Aperio on behalf of clients (including the Fund) to purchase or dispose of investments, or exercise rights or undertake business transactions, may be restricted by regulation or otherwise impaired. As a result, Aperio on behalf of its clients (including the Fund) may limit purchases, sell existing investments, or otherwise restrict, forgo or limit the exercise of rights (including transferring, outsourcing or limiting voting rights or forgoing the right to receive dividends) when BlackRock, in its sole discretion, deems it appropriate in light of potential regulatory or other restrictions on ownership or other consequences resulting from reaching investment thresholds.
51
In those circumstances where ownership thresholds or limitations must be observed, BlackRock seeks to allocate limited investment opportunities equitably among clients (including the Fund), taking into consideration benchmark weight and investment strategy. When ownership in certain securities nears an applicable threshold, BlackRock may limit purchases in such securities to the issuer’s weighting in the applicable benchmark used by Aperio to manage the Fund. If client (including Fund) holdings of an issuer exceed an applicable threshold and BlackRock is unable to obtain relief to enable the continued holding of such investments, it may be necessary to sell down these positions to meet the applicable limitations. In these cases, benchmark overweight positions will be sold prior to benchmark positions being reduced to meet applicable limitations.
In addition to the foregoing, other ownership thresholds may trigger reporting requirements to governmental and regulatory authorities, and such reports may entail the disclosure of the identity of a client or Aperio’s intended strategy with respect to such security or asset.
GMO. Conflicts of interest may arise in GMO’s side-by-side management of multiple accounts. It is the policy of GMO to seek to ensure that no client account is given inappropriate preferential treatment over another client account. GMO believes it effectively manages the conflicts that exist as a result of side-by-side management in the way that it has organized and focused its business, and through strong internal controls and procedures. GMO has implemented firm-wide Trade Allocation Policies and Procedures that are applicable to all of its Investment Teams and the GMO Trading Desk. GMO’s standards and procedures are designed so that over time accounts, regardless of an account’s fee type, are not likely to be systematically advantaged or disadvantaged due to the order placement/execution process. In furtherance of treating all clients equitably, trades are placed as block trades where possible. Block trades on any given day generally will be allocated among participating accounts pro-rata to the original order size for the accounts. With regard to limited offerings (IPOs), each investment team must be particularly diligent to ensure that these offerings are allocated equitably among accounts eligible to participate. GMO’s Trading Desk performs automated back-testing, which is reviewed by GMO’s Compliance Group, to ensure that the trade allocation standards are functioning as intended. To manage further the potential conflicts of interest associated with side-by-side management of accounts, performance dispersion among accounts employing similar investment strategies is periodically reviewed to ensure that any material divergence in expected performance is adequately understood.
MacKay Shields. MacKay Shields does not favor the interest of one client over another and it has adopted a Trade Allocation Policy designed so that all client accounts will be treated fairly and no one client account will receive, over time, preferential treatment over another.
We maintain investment teams with their own distinct investment process that operate independent of each other when making portfolio management decisions. Certain investment teams consist of Portfolio Managers, Research Analysts, and Traders, while certain other investment teams share Research Analysts and/or Traders. MacKay Shields’ investment teams may compete with each other for the same investment opportunities and/or take contrary positions. At times, two or more of MacKay Shields’ investment teams may jointly manage the assets of a single client portfolio (“Crossover Mandate”). In such instances, the asset allocation decisions will be discussed amongst the various investment teams, but the day-to-day investment decision-making process will typically be made independently by each team for the portion of the Crossover Mandate that team is responsible for managing. Orders within an investment team will typically be aggregated or bunched to reduce the costs of the transactions. Orders are typically not aggregated across investment teams even though there may be orders by separate investment teams to execute the same instrument on the same trading day; provided, however, that orders for the same instrument are typically aggregated across investment teams that are supported by a shared trading desk.
52
MacKay Shields’ clients have held, and it is expected that in the future they will at times hold, different segments of the capital structure of the same issuer that have different priorities. These investments create conflicts of interest, particularly because MacKay Shields can take certain actions for clients that can have an adverse effect on other clients. For example, certain MacKay Shields clients may hold instruments that are senior or subordinated relative to instruments of the same issuer held by other clients, and any action that the portfolio managers were to take on behalf of the issuer’s senior instrument, for instance, could have an adverse effect on the issuer’s junior instrument held by other clients, and vice versa, particularly in distressed or default situations. To the extent MacKay Shields or any of its employees were to serve on a formal or informal creditor or similar committee on behalf of a client, such conflicts of interest may be exacerbated.
MacKay Shields engages in transactions and investment strategies for certain clients that differ from the transactions and strategies executed on behalf of other clients, including clients that have retained the services of the same investment team. MacKay Shields may make investments for certain clients that they conclude are inappropriate for other clients. For instance, clients within one investment strategy may take short positions in the debt or equity instruments of certain issuers, while at the same time those instruments or other instruments of that issuer are acquired or held long by clients in another investment strategy, or within the same strategy, and vice versa.
Additionally, MacKay Shields’ investment strategies are available through a variety of investment products, including, without limitation, separately managed accounts, private funds, mutual funds and ETFs. Given the different structures of these products, certain clients are subject to terms and conditions that are materially different or more advantageous than available under different products. For example, mutual funds offer investors the ability to redeem from the fund daily, while private funds offer less frequent liquidity. Similarly, a client with a separately managed account may have more transparency regarding the positions held in its account than would be available to an investor in a collective investment vehicle. Further, separately managed account clients have the ability to terminate their investment management agreement with little or no notice (subject to the terms of the investment advisory agreement or similar agreement).
As a result of these differing liquidity and other terms, MacKay Shields may acquire and/or dispose of investments for a client either prior to or subsequent to the acquisition and/or disposition of the same or similar securities held by another client. In certain circumstances, purchases or sales of securities by one client could adversely affect the value of the same securities held in another client’s portfolio. In addition, MacKay Shields has caused, and expects in the future to cause, certain clients to invest in opportunities with different levels of concentration or on different terms than that to which other clients invest in the same securities. These differences in terms and concentration could lead to different investment outcomes among clients investing in the same securities. MacKay Shields seeks to tailor its investment advisory services to meet each client’s investment objective, constraints and investment guidelines and MacKay Shields’ judgments with respect to a particular client will at times differ from its judgments for other clients, even when such clients pursue similar investment strategies.
53
MacKay Shields permits its personnel, including portfolio managers and other investment personnel, to engage in personal securities transactions, including buying or selling securities that it has recommended to, or purchased or sold on behalf of, clients. These transactions raise potential conflicts of interest, including when they involve securities owned or considered for purchase or sale by or on behalf of a client account. MacKay Shields has adopted a Code of Ethics to assist and guide the portfolio managers and other investment personnel when faced with a conflict. MacKay Shields’ services to each client are not exclusive. The nature of managing accounts for multiple clients creates a conflict of interest with regard to time available to serve clients. MacKay Shields and its portfolio managers will devote as much of their time to the activities of each client as they deem necessary and appropriate. Although MacKay Shields strives to identify and mitigate all conflicts of interest, and seeks to treat its clients in a fair and reasonable manner consistent with its fiduciary duties, there may be times when conflicts of interest are not resolved in a manner favorable to a specific client.
Additional material conflicts of interests are presented within Part 2A of MacKay Shields’ Form ADV.
Nuveen. Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple accounts are presented a number of potential conflicts, including, among others, those discussed below.
The management of multiple accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each account. Nuveen seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most accounts managed by a portfolio manager in a particular investment strategy are managed using the same investment models.
If a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one account, an account may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible accounts. To deal with these situations, Nuveen has adopted procedures for allocating limited opportunities across multiple accounts.
With respect to many of its clients’ accounts, Nuveen determines which broker to use to execute transaction orders, consistent with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. However, with respect to certain other accounts, Nuveen may be limited by the client with respect to the selection of brokers or may be instructed to direct trades through a particular broker. In these cases, Nuveen may place separate, non-simultaneous, transactions for the Fund and other accounts which may temporarily affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the detriment of the Fund or the other accounts.
Some clients are subject to different regulations. As a consequence of this difference in regulatory requirements, some clients may not be permitted to engage in all the investment techniques or transactions or to engage in these transactions to the same extent as the other accounts managed by the portfolio manager. Finally, the appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where Nuveen has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of some accounts, with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.
Conflicts of interest may also arise when the Sub-Adviser invests one or more of its client accounts in different or multiple parts of the same issuer’s capital structure, including investments in public versus private securities, debt versus equity, or senior versus junior/subordinated debt, or otherwise where there are different or inconsistent rights or benefits. Decisions or actions such as investing, trading, proxy voting, exercising, waiving or amending rights or covenants, workout activity, or serving on a board, committee or other involvement in governance may result in conflicts of interest between clients holding different securities or investments. Generally, individual portfolio managers will seek to act in a manner that they believe serves the best interest of the accounts they manage. In cases where a portfolio manager or team faces a conflict among its client accounts, it will seek to act in a manner that it believes best reflects its overall fiduciary duty, which may result in relative advantages or disadvantages for particular accounts.
54
Nuveen has adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts common among investment managers. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
Nuveen or its affiliates, including TIAA, sponsor an array of financial products for retirement and other investment goals, and provide services worldwide to a diverse customer base. Accordingly, from time to time, the Fund may be restricted from purchasing or selling securities, or from engaging in other investment activities because of regulatory, legal or contractual restrictions that arise due to another client account’s investments and/or the internal policies of Nuveen, TIAA or its affiliates designed to comply with such restrictions. As a result, there may be periods, for example, when Nuveen will not initiate or recommend certain types of transactions in certain securities or instruments with respect to which investment limits have been reached.
The investment activities of Nuveen or its affiliates may also limit the investment strategies and rights of the Fund. For example, in certain circumstances where the Fund invests in securities issued by companies that operate in certain regulated industries, in certain emerging or international markets, or are subject to corporate or regulatory ownership definitions, or invest in certain futures and derivative transactions, there may be limits on the aggregate amount invested by Nuveen or its affiliates for the Fund and other client accounts that may not be exceeded without the grant of a license or other regulatory or corporate consent. If certain aggregate ownership thresholds are reached or certain transactions undertaken, the ability of Nuveen, on behalf of the Fund or other client accounts, to purchase or dispose of investments or exercise rights or undertake business transactions may be restricted by regulation or otherwise impaired. As a result, Nuveen, on behalf of the Fund or other client accounts, may limit purchases, sell existing investments, or otherwise restrict or limit the exercise of rights (including voting rights) when Nuveen, in its sole discretion, deems it appropriate in light of potential regulatory or other restrictions on ownership or other consequences resulting from reaching investment thresholds.
Wellington. Individual investment professionals at Wellington manage multiple accounts for multiple clients. These accounts may include mutual funds, separate accounts (assets managed on behalf of institutions, such as pension funds, insurance companies, foundations, or separately managed account programs sponsored by financial intermediaries), bank common trust accounts, and hedge funds. The Wellington portfolio manager listed above generally manages accounts in several different investment styles. These accounts may have investment objectives, strategies, time horizons, tax considerations, and risk profiles that differ from those of the Fund. The manager makes investment decisions for each account, including the Fund, based on the investment objectives, policies, practices, benchmarks, cash flows, tax, and other relevant investment considerations applicable to that account. Consequently, the manager may purchase or sell securities, including initial public offerings (IPOs), for one account and not another account, and the performance of securities purchased for one account may vary from the performance of securities purchased for other accounts. Alternatively, these accounts may be managed in a similar fashion to Wellington’s share of the Fund, and thus the accounts may have similar—and in some cases nearly identical—objectives, strategies, and/or holdings.
55
A manager or other investment professional at Wellington may place transactions on behalf of other accounts that are directly or indirectly contrary to investment decisions made on behalf of the investments in the Fund or make investment decisions that are similar to those made for the Fund, both of which have the potential to adversely impact the Fund depending on market conditions. For example, an investment professional may purchase a security in one account while appropriately selling that same security in another account. Similarly, the manager may purchase the same security for the relevant Fund and one or more other accounts at or about the same time. In those instances, the other accounts will have access to their respective holdings prior to the public disclosure of the relevant Fund’s holdings. Also, investment professionals at Wellington may make investments in different parts of an issuer’s capital structure such as acquiring a loan of a particular borrower in one account while making an equity investment in that same borrower on behalf of another account. In addition, some of these accounts have fee structures, including performance fees, which are or have the potential to be higher, in some cases significantly higher, than the fees Wellington receives for managing the Fund. Mr. Angeli also manages accounts which pay performance allocations to Wellington or its affiliates. Because incentive payments paid by Wellington to the manager are tied to revenues earned by Wellington and, where noted, to the performance achieved by the manager in each account, the incentives associated with any given account may be significantly higher or lower than those associated with other accounts managed by the manager. Finally, the manager may hold shares or investments in the other pooled investment vehicles and/or other accounts identified above.
Ownership of Fund Shares
The following table shows the dollar range of each portfolio manager’s beneficial ownership of shares of the Funds they manage as of March 31, 2025:
Name | Dollar Range of Fund Shares Owned | |||
Equity Allocation Fund |
Municipal Bond Fund |
Defensive Allocation Fund |
Taxable Bond Fund | |
John Allen | $100,001–$500,000 | NONE | $500,001–$1,000,000 | $10,001–$50,000 |
Marc Castellani | $10,001–$50,000 | NONE | $10,001–$50,000 | NONE |
Robert Miller | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Nicholas Venditti | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Terry J. Goode | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Ran Leshem | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Brian Ko | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Michael Branch | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Willie Kwan | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Tom Hancock | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Anthony Hene | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Ty Cobb | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Michael Denlinger | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Robert DiMella | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Daniel J. Close | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Paul L. Brennan | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Stephen Candido | N/A | NONE | N/A | N/A |
Steven C. Angeli | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A |
56
PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITER AND OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS
Principal Underwriter
Distribution Services, LLC (formerly, UMB Distribution Services, LLC), located at Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101, serves as the Trust’s principal underwriter. Shares of the Funds are distributed on a continuous basis at their current NAV per share, without imposition of any front-end or contingent deferred sales charge, by the principal underwriter.
Transfer Agent
UMB Fund Services, Inc., located at 235 West Galena St., Milwaukee, WI 53212, serves as the Trust’s transfer agent and dividend disbursing agent. Shareholders of the Trust may contact the transfer agent with any questions regarding their transactions in shares of the Trust and account balances.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP, located at 555 East Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53202, is the independent registered public accounting firm of the Trust and is responsible for conducting the annual audit of the financial statements of the Trust. The selection of the independent registered public accounting firm is approved annually by the Board.
Custodian and Fund Accounting Agent
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”), located at Seaport Center, 70 Fargo Street, Boston, MA 02210-1950, serves as custodian of the Trust’s assets and is responsible for maintaining custody of the Funds’ cash and investments and retaining subcustodians, including in connection with the custody of foreign securities. Cash held by the custodian, the amount of which may at times be substantial, is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to the amount of available insurance coverage limits. JPMorgan also serves as the Trust’s fund accounting agent and provides various accounting services necessary for the operations of the Trust including the maintenance of the fund’s general ledger and the determination of NAV.
Administrator
UMB Fund Services, Inc., located at 235 West Galena St., Milwaukee, WI 53212, serves as the Trust’s administrator and provides various administrative and accounting services necessary for the operations of the Trust including supervising the maintenance of the fund’s general ledger, the preparation of the fund’s financial statements, the payment of dividends and other distributions to shareholders; and preparing specified financial, tax, and other reports. The Trust pays the administrator an annual fee based on the Funds’ average net assets. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Equity Allocation Fund, Municipal Bond Fund, Defensive Allocation Fund, and Taxable Bond Fund paid the administrator $273,424, $252,455, $216,577, and $60,678, respectively.
57
Securities Lending
The Equity Allocation Fund participates in a securities lending program, providing for the lending of equity securities to qualified brokers, in exchange for the opportunity to earn additional income for participation. The Fund pays a portion of the net revenue earned on securities lending activities to its securities lending agent, JPMorgan.
Under the securities lending program, the Equity Allocation Fund receives collateral in return for the securities and records a corresponding payable for collateral due to the respective broker. Collateral received consists of either cash or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or common stock listed on certain indices. The amount of collateral received is maintained at a minimum level of 102% of the prior day’s market value of the securities loaned, plus any accrued interest. Cash collateral is reinvested in short-term securities, including repurchase agreements, commercial paper, master notes, floating rate corporate notes and money market funds.
The dollar amounts of income and fees/compensation related to securities lending activities of the Equity Allocation Fund for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 were as follows:
Gross Income (including collateral reinvestment) |
Revenue Split |
Cash collateral management services fees |
Administrative and Indemnification fees |
Rebates to (from) borrowers |
Other fees | Aggregate Fees |
Net income from securities lending activities |
$1,005,536 | $(24,613) | $- | $- | $(923,462) | $- | $(948,075) | $57,461 |
Legal Counsel
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004, serves as counsel to the Trust.
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
NAV is determined as of the regularly scheduled close of normal trading on the NYSE (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) each day the NYSE is open, except that no computation need be made on a day on which no orders to purchase or redeem shares have been received. The NYSE currently observes the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Jr. Day (third Monday in January), Presidents Day (third Monday in February), Good Friday (Friday before Easter), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Juneteenth, Independence Day, Labor Day (first Monday in September), Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas Day.
NAV per share is computed by dividing the value of a Fund’s net assets (i.e., the value of its assets less its liabilities) by the total number of the Fund’s shares outstanding. In computing NAV, securities are valued at market value as of the close of trading on each business day when the NYSE is open. Securities, other than stock options, listed on the NYSE or other exchanges are valued on the basis of the last reported sale price on the exchange on which they are primarily traded. However, if the last sale price on the NYSE is different from the last sale price on any other exchange, the NYSE price will be used. If there are no sales on that day, then the securities are valued at the bid price on the NYSE or other primary exchange for that day. Securities traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market are valued on the basis of the last sales price as reported by NASDAQ®. If there are no sales on that day, then the securities are valued at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices as reported by NASDAQ®. Stock options and stock index options traded on national securities exchanges or on NASDAQ® are valued at the mean between the latest bid and asked prices for such options. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available and other assets are valued at fair value as determined pursuant to procedures adopted in good faith by the Board. A pricing service may be used to determine the fair value of securities held by the Fund. Any such service might value the investments based on methods that include consideration of yields or prices of securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. The service may also employ electronic data-processing techniques, a matrix system, or both to determine valuation. The Board will review and monitor the methods such services use to assure itself that securities are valued at their fair values.
58
The values of securities held by the Fund and other assets used in computing NAV are determined as of the time at which trading in such securities is completed each day. That time, in the case of foreign securities, generally occurs at various times before the close of the NYSE. Trading in securities listed on foreign securities exchanges will be valued at the last sale or, if no sales are reported, at the bid price as of the close of the exchange, subject to possible adjustment as described in the Prospectus. Foreign currency exchange rates are also generally determined before the close of the NYSE. On occasion, the values of such securities and exchange rates may be affected by events occurring between the time as of which determinations of such values or exchange rates are made and the close of the NYSE. When such events materially affect the value of securities held by the Fund or its liabilities, such securities and liabilities will be valued at fair value in accordance with procedures adopted in good faith by the Board. The values of any assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies will be converted to U.S. dollars based on exchange rates supplied by a quotation service.
Applicable federal tax requirements generally limit the degree to which a Fund may invest in a subsidiary to an amount not exceeding 25% of its total assets. A subsidiary prices its respective portfolio investments pursuant to the same pricing and valuation methodologies and procedures employed by a Fund. A subsidiary generally offers to redeem all or a portion of its respective shares at the current NAV every day a Fund is open for business. The value of shares of a subsidiary will fluctuate with the value of a subsidiary’s respective portfolio investments.
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Trust has adopted policies and procedures regarding disclosure of portfolio holdings information (the “Disclosure Policy”). The Disclosure Policy applies to the Trust and the Adviser, sub-advisers, and other service providers involved in the administration, operation, or custody of the Fund (collectively, the “Service Providers”). Pursuant to the Disclosure Policy, non-public information concerning the Fund’s portfolio holdings may be disclosed to its Service Providers only if such disclosure is consistent with the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and the fiduciary duties owed by the Fund and the Adviser and sub-advisers to the Fund’s shareholders.
The Trust discloses its portfolio holdings in regulatory filings, including shareholder reports, Form N-PORT, and other filings, reports or disclosure documents as may be required by law. The Trust may in the future post its portfolio holdings on a monthly basis to a website. The Adviser, along with the Trust’s administrator, is responsible for disclosure of portfolio holdings to Service Providers (which may also include auditing services, proxy voting and other services, such as disclosure to a rating or ranking organization). To ensure that the disclosure of the Trust’s portfolio holdings is in the best interests of shareholders, and to avoid any potential or actual conflicts of interest with Service Providers, the disclosure of the Trust’s portfolio holdings for a legitimate business purpose will be approved by the Board in advance of the disclosure, other than with respect to disclosure to existing Service Providers in connection with their provision of services to the Trust. In the event that the Trust or a Service Provider discloses the Trust’s portfolio holdings to a selected third-party for a legitimate business purpose prior to the release of the Trust’s portfolio holdings to the public, such third party shall be required to execute a confidentiality agreement that, among other things, prohibits trading on such information.
59
The Funds and their Service Providers may not receive compensation or any other consideration (which includes any agreement to maintain assets in the Fund or in other investment companies or accounts managed by the Adviser, a sub-adviser, or any affiliated person of the Adviser or sub-adviser) in connection with the disclosure of portfolio holdings information of the Funds. The Funds’ Disclosure Policy is implemented and overseen by the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust, subject to the oversight of the Board. Periodic reports regarding these procedures will be provided to the Board. Portfolio holdings information will be deemed public when it has been posted to the Funds’ public website or in periodic regulatory filings on the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov).
All portfolio holdings information that has not been disseminated in a manner making it available to investors generally is considered non-public portfolio holdings information for the purposes of the Disclosure Policy. Pursuant to the Disclosure Policy, the Fund or its Service Providers may disclose non-public portfolio holdings information to certain third parties who fall within pre-authorized categories on a daily basis, with no lag time unless otherwise specified below. These third parties include: (i) the Fund’s Service Providers and others who need access to such information in the performance of their contractual or other duties and responsibilities to the Fund (e.g., custodians, accountants, the Adviser, sub-advisers, administrators, attorneys, officers and Trustees) and who are subject to duties of confidentiality imposed by law or contract; (ii) brokers who execute trades for the Fund; (iii) evaluation service providers; and (iv) shareholders requesting in-kind redemptions.
TAX INFORMATION
The following information supplements and should be read in conjunction with the tax section in the Funds’ Prospectus. In addition, the following is only a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations that generally affect the Funds and their shareholders. No attempt is made to present a comprehensive explanation of the tax treatment of the Funds or their shareholders, and the discussion here and in the Prospectus is not intended as a substitute for careful tax planning. Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors with specific reference to their own tax situations, including their state, local, and foreign tax liabilities.
The following general discussion of certain federal income tax consequences is based on the Code and the regulations issued thereunder as in effect on the date of this SAI. New legislation, as well as administrative changes or court decisions, may significantly change the conclusions expressed herein, and may have a retroactive effect with respect to the transactions contemplated herein.
Qualification as a Regulated Investment Company
Each Fund is treated as a separate entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Each Fund has elected and intends to qualify each year to be treated as a regulated investment company (a “RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Code. If so qualified, each Fund will generally not be subject to federal income taxes on that part of its net investment income and net capital gains (the excess of the Fund’s net long-term capital gains over its net short-term capital losses) that it timely distributes to its shareholders.
Certain federal income and excise taxes would be imposed on a Fund if it fails to make certain required distributions of its income to shareholders. The Funds intend, however, to make distributions in a manner that will avoid the imposition of any such taxes. If, however, for any taxable year a Fund fails to qualify for treatment as a RIC, such Fund would be subject to federal corporate income tax on its taxable income. To qualify as a RIC, a Fund, among other things, must generally (a) make distributions to shareholders each year in a timely manner at least equal to the sum of (1) 90% of its “investment company taxable income” as defined in the Code (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction) and (2) 90% of its net tax-exempt income, if any, (b) derive at least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, payments received with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities, or foreign currencies, other income derived with respect to the Fund’s business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies, and net income derived from interests in “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (generally, publicly traded partnerships other than those where at least 90% of their gross income is gross income that would otherwise be qualifying gross income for a RIC) (the “Qualifying Income Test”); and (c) diversify its holdings so that at the end of each quarter of each taxable year (i) at least 50% of the market value of the Fund’s total assets is represented by cash and cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, with such other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount not greater than 5% of the Fund’s total assets and to not more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer, and (ii) not more than 25% of the value of its total assets is invested, including through corporations in which the Fund owns a 20% or more voting stock interest, in the securities (other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs) of any one issuer, the securities (other than securities of other RICs) of any two or more issuers that the Fund controls and are determined to be engaged in the same or similar trades or businesses or related trades or businesses, or the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships (the “Asset Test”).
60
If a Fund qualifies as a RIC and meets the distribution requirement described above, but chooses to retain some portion of its taxable income or gains, it generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rate (currently 21%) on the amount retained. A Fund may designate certain amounts retained as undistributed net capital gain in a notice to its shareholders, who (i) will be required to include in income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as long-term capital gain, their proportionate shares of the undistributed amount so designated, (ii) will be entitled to credit their proportionate shares of the income tax paid by the Fund on that undistributed amount against their federal income tax liabilities and to claim refunds to the extent such credits exceed their liabilities, and (iii) will be entitled to increase their tax basis, for federal income tax purposes, in their shares by an amount equal to the excess of the amount of undistributed net capital gain included in their respective income over their respective income tax credits. Each Fund is treated as a separate corporation for federal income tax purposes. A Fund therefore is considered to be a separate entity in determining its treatment under the rules for RICs described herein. Losses in one Fund do not offset gains in another and the requirements (other than certain organizational requirements) for qualifying RIC status are determined at the Fund level rather than at the Trust level.
If a Fund fails to satisfy the Qualifying Income or Asset Tests in any taxable year, such Fund may be eligible for relief provisions if the failures are due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect and if a penalty tax is paid with respect to each failure to satisfy the applicable requirements. Additionally, relief is provided for certain de minimis failures of the diversification requirements where the Fund corrects the failure within a specified period. If a Fund fails to maintain qualification as a RIC for a tax year, and the relief provisions are not available, such Fund will be subject to federal income tax at the regular corporate rate (currently 21%) without any deduction for distributions to shareholders. In such case, its shareholders would be taxed as if they received ordinary dividends, to the extent of a Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits although corporate shareholders could be eligible for the dividends received deduction (subject to certain limitations) and individuals may be able to benefit from the lower tax rates available to qualified dividend income. In addition, a Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make substantial distributions before requalifying as a RIC. The Board reserves the right not to maintain the qualification of a Fund as a RIC if it determines such course of action to be beneficial to shareholders.
61
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Fund is permitted to carry forward indefinitely a net capital loss to offset its capital gains, if any, in years following the year of the loss. To the extent subsequent capital gains are offset by such losses, they will not result in U.S. federal income tax liability to the Fund and may not be distributed as capital gains to shareholders. Generally, the Fund may not carry forward any losses other than net capital losses. Under certain circumstances, the Fund may elect to treat certain losses as though they were incurred on the first day of the taxable year immediately following the taxable year in which they were actually incurred.
If a Fund has a net capital loss for a taxable year, the excess of the Fund’s net short-term capital losses over its net long-term capital gains is treated as a short-term capital loss arising on the first day of the Fund’s next taxable year, and the excess (if any) of the Fund’s net long-term capital losses over its net short-term capital gains is treated as a long-term capital loss arising on the first day of the Fund’s next taxable year. The carryover of capital losses may be limited under the general loss limitation rules if a Fund experiences an ownership change as defined in the Code.
Notwithstanding the distribution requirement described above, which generally only requires the Funds to distribute at least the sum of 90% of its annual investment company taxable income and the excess of its exempt interest income (but does not require any minimum distribution of net capital gain), a Fund will be subject to a nondeductible 4% federal excise tax to the extent it fails to distribute by the end of any calendar year at least the sum of 98% of its ordinary income for that year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income (the excess of short- and long-term capital gain over short- and long-term capital loss) for the one-year period ending on October 31 of that year (including any retained amount from the prior calendar year on which a Fund paid no federal income tax). The Fund intends to make sufficient distributions in a timely manner to avoid liability for the federal excise tax but can make no assurances that all such tax will be completely eliminated. For example, a Fund may receive delayed or corrected tax reporting statements from its investments that cause such Fund to accrue additional income and gains after such Fund has already made its excise tax distributions for the year. In such a situation, a Fund may incur an excise tax liability resulting from such delayed receipt of such tax information statements. In addition, the Funds may in certain circumstances be required to liquidate portfolio investments in order to make sufficient distributions to avoid federal income or excise tax liability when the investment adviser might not otherwise have chosen to do so, and liquidation of investments in such circumstances may affect the ability of the Funds to satisfy the requirement for qualification as a RIC.
Federal Income Tax Treatment of Dividends and Distributions
Shareholders subject to federal income taxation will generally have to pay any applicable federal income taxes on the dividends and capital gains distributions they receive from a Fund, whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional shares of the Fund. Dividends and capital gains distributions may also be subject to applicable state and local taxes. Dividends derived from net investment income or net realized short-term capital gains generally will be taxable to shareholders as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes, although under certain circumstances dividends may be treated as qualified dividend income, as described below. Distributions by the Funds of their net capital gains that are reported as capital gain dividends by the Funds will be taxable to individual shareholders as long-term capital gains, currently set at a maximum rate of 20% regardless of how long shareholders have held their shares of the Fund. Distributions paid in January, but declared by a Fund in October, November or December of the previous year may be taxable to you in the previous year. In addition, certain distributions made after the close of a taxable year of a Fund may be “spilled back” and treated for certain purposes as paid by the Fund during such taxable year. In such case, shareholders generally will be treated as having received such dividends in the taxable year in which the distributions were actually made. For purposes of calculating the amount of a RIC’s undistributed income and gain subject to the 4% excise tax described above, such “spilled back” dividends are treated as paid by the RIC when they are actually paid.
62
Depending on the composition of a Fund’s income, the entire amount or a portion of the dividends paid by the Fund from net investment income may be reported as “qualified dividend income,” which is taxable to individual shareholders at long-term capital gains rates, provided that certain holding-period requirements are met. In general, dividend income of the Fund distributed to shareholders may be reported as qualified dividend income to the extent that the Fund’s income consists of qualified dividend income. If 95% or more of the Fund’s gross income (calculated without taking into account net capital gain derived from sales or other dispositions of stock or securities) consists of qualified dividend income, the Fund may report all distributions of such income as qualified dividend income. In general, qualified dividend income includes dividends paid by U.S. corporations and certain foreign corporations. However, the lower tax rate will apply only if the individual shareholder holds shares in the Fund, and the Fund holds shares in the dividend-paying corporation, at least 61 days during a prescribed period. The prescribed period is the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the date on which the shareholder or the Fund, as the case may be, becomes entitled to receive the dividend. In determining the holding period for this purpose, any period during which the recipient’s risk of loss is offset by means of options, short sales, or similar transactions is not counted. In addition, an individual shareholder would not benefit to the extent that he or she is obligated (e.g., pursuant to a short sale or securities lending arrangement) to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. Distributions that the Funds receive from an underlying fund taxable as a RIC or a REIT will be treated as qualified dividend income only to the extent so reported by such underlying fund or REIT. A Fund’s investment strategies will significantly limit its ability to make distributions eligible for treatment as qualified dividend income.
Depending on the composition of a Fund’s income, the entire amount or a portion of the dividends paid by the Fund from net investment income may qualify for the dividends received deduction allowable to qualifying U.S. corporate shareholders (the “dividends received deduction”). In general, dividend income of a Fund distributed to qualifying corporate shareholders will be eligible for the dividends received deduction only to the extent that the Fund’s income consists of dividends paid by U.S. corporations. However, a corporate shareholder’s dividends received deduction will be disallowed unless it holds shares in the Fund, and the Fund holds shares in the dividend-paying corporation, at least 46 days during the 91-day period beginning 45 days before the date on which the shareholder or the Fund, as the case may be, becomes entitled to receive the dividend. Certain preferred stock must have a holding period of at least 91 days during the 181-day period beginning on the date that is 90 days before the date on which the stock becomes ex-dividend as to that dividend in order to be eligible. In determining the holding period for this purpose, any period during which the recipient’s risk of loss is offset by means of options, short sales, or similar transactions is not counted. In addition, a corporate shareholder would not benefit to the extent that it is obligated (e.g., pursuant to a short sale) to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. Furthermore, the dividends received deduction will be disallowed to the extent that a corporate shareholder’s investment in shares of the Fund, or the Fund’s investment in the shares of the dividend-paying corporation, is financed with indebtedness. A Fund’s investment strategies will significantly limit its ability to make distributions eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders.
Distributions in excess of a Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (as calculated for federal income tax purposes) are treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of (and in reduction of) your tax basis in the shares, and any such amount in excess of that basis will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of shares. A taxable shareholder may wish to avoid investing in a Fund shortly before a distribution, because the distribution will generally be taxable even though it may economically represent a return of a portion of the shareholder’s investment.
A RIC that receives business interest income may pass through its net business interest income for purposes of the tax rules applicable to the interest expense limitations under Section 163(j) of the Code. A RIC’s total “Section 163(j) Interest Dividend” for a tax year is limited to the excess of the RIC’s business interest income over the sum of its business interest expense and its other deductions properly allocable to its business interest income. A RIC may, in its discretion, designate all or a portion of ordinary dividends as Section 163(j) Interest Dividends, which would allow the recipient shareholder to treat the designated portion of such dividends as interest income for purposes of determining such shareholder’s interest expense deduction limitation under Section 163(j) of the Code. This can potentially increase the amount of a shareholder’s interest expense deductible under Section 163(j) of the Code. In general, to be eligible to treat a Section 163(j) Interest Dividend as interest income, you must have held your shares in a Fund for more than 180 days during the 361-day period beginning on the date that is 180 days before the date on which the share becomes ex-dividend with respect to such dividend. Section 163(j) Interest Dividends, if so designated by a Fund, will be reported to your financial intermediary or otherwise in accordance with the requirements specified by the IRS.
63
Each year, shareholders of the Fund will be sent information on dividends and capital gains distributions for tax purposes, including information as to the portion eligible for treatment as ordinary income, the portion taxable as long-term capital gains, the amount of dividends that are reported as qualified dividend income, and the amount of dividends eligible for the dividends received deduction available for corporations.
Municipal Bond Fund
The Code permits tax-exempt interest received by the Municipal Bond Fund to flow through as tax-exempt “exempt-interest dividends” to the Fund’s shareholders, provided that the Fund qualifies as a RIC and at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets at the close of each quarter of its taxable year consists of tax-exempt obligations, i.e., obligations that pay interest excluded from gross income under Section 103(a) of the Code. Provided that the Municipal Bond Fund satisfies the aforementioned tests, the part of the Municipal Bond Fund’s net investment income which is attributable to interest from tax-exempt obligations and which is distributed to shareholders will be reported by the Fund as an “exempt-interest dividend” under the Code. Exempt-interest dividends are excluded from a shareholder’s gross income under the Code but are nevertheless required to be reported on the shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return. That portion of the Municipal Bond Fund’s dividends and distributions not reported as exempt-interest dividends will be taxable as described below. Since the Municipal Bond Fund invests primarily in sources that do not pay dividends, it is not expected that the distributions paid by the Municipal Bond Fund will qualify for either the dividends received deduction for corporations or any favorable U.S. federal income tax rate available to non-corporate shareholders on “qualified dividend income”.
Exempt-interest dividends derived from interest on certain “private activity bonds” will generally be items of tax preference, which increase alternative minimum taxable income for taxpayers that are subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax. Interest paid on a municipal bond issued after December 31, 2017 to advance or refund another municipal bond is subject to federal income tax.
Interest on indebtedness incurred or continued by a shareholder to purchase or carry shares of the Municipal Bond Fund will not be deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent it is deemed under the Code and applicable regulations to relate to exempt-interest dividends received from the Municipal Bond Fund. The Municipal Bond Fund may not be an appropriate investment for persons who are “substantial users” of facilities financed by industrial revenue or private activity bonds or persons related to substantial users. Shareholders receiving social security or certain railroad retirement benefits may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a portion of such benefits as a result of receiving exempt-interest dividends paid by the Municipal Bond Fund.
64
The Municipal Bond Fund may invest a portion of its portfolio in taxable obligations and may engage in transactions generating gain or income that is not tax-exempt, e.g., the Municipal Bond Fund may purchase and sell non-municipal securities, sell or lend portfolio securities, enter into repurchase agreements, dispose of rights to when-issued securities prior to issuance, acquire debt obligations at a market discount, acquire certain stripped tax-exempt obligations or enter into options and futures transactions. The Municipal Bond Fund’s distributions of such gain or income will not be “exempt-interest dividends” and accordingly will be taxable.
Sales, Exchanges or Redemptions
A sale, exchange, or redemption of the shares of a Fund will generally result in the recognition of gain or loss for federal income tax purposes. In general, if Fund shares are sold, exchanged, or redeemed, the shareholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the shareholder’s adjusted basis in the shares. Assuming a shareholder holds shares as a capital asset, such gain or loss generally will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for more than twelve months and otherwise will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss. Any loss arising from the sale or redemption of shares of the Fund held for six months or less will be treated for U.S. federal tax purposes as a long-term capital loss to the extent of any amount of capital gains distributions the shareholder receives with respect to such shares (including any amounts credited to the shareholder as undistributed capital gains). In addition, any loss arising from the sale or redemption of shares of the Municipal Bond Fund held for six months or less will be disallowed to the extent of any amount of exempt-interest dividends the shareholder receives with respect to such shares. For purposes of determining whether shares in the Fund have been held for six months or less, a shareholder’s holding period is suspended for any periods during which the shareholder’s risk of loss is diminished as a result of holding one or more other positions in substantially similar or related property, or through certain options or short sales.
U.S. individuals with income exceeding $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly) are subject to a 3.8% tax on their “net investment income”, including interest, dividends and capital gains (including any capital gains realized on the sale or exchange of shares of a Fund). “Net investment income” does not include distributions of exempt-interest. This tax is also applicable to certain estates and trusts.
The Funds (or their administrative agents) are generally required to report to the IRS and furnish to Fund shareholders cost basis and holding period information for Fund shares. For each sale of its shares, each Fund will permit shareholders to elect from among several IRS-accepted cost basis methods, including the average cost basis method. In the absence of an election, each Fund will use the FIFO (first in, first out) method as the default cost basis method. The cost basis method elected by a shareholder (or the cost basis method applied by default) for each sale of shares may not be changed after the settlement date of each such sale of a Fund’s shares. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the best IRS-accepted cost basis method for their tax situation and to obtain more information about how the cost basis reporting rules apply to them. Shareholders also should carefully review any cost basis information provided to them and make any additional basis, holding period or other adjustments that are required when reporting these amounts on their federal income tax returns.
Tax Treatment of Complex Securities
The Funds may invest in complex securities. These investments may be subject to numerous special and complex rules. These rules could affect a Fund’s ability to qualify as a RIC, affect whether income, gains and losses recognized by a Fund are treated as ordinary or capital, accelerate the recognition of income to a Fund and/or defer a Fund’s ability to recognize losses. In turn, these rules may affect the amount, timing or character of the income distributed to you by the Fund. These provisions also may require a Fund to mark to market certain types of positions in its portfolio (i.e., treat them as if they were closed out) which may cause the Fund to recognize income without the Fund receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts sufficient to enable the Fund to satisfy the RIC distribution requirements for avoiding income and excise taxes. Each Fund intends to monitor its transactions, intends to make appropriate tax elections, and intends to make appropriate entries in its books and records to mitigate the effect of these rules and preserve the Fund’s qualification for treatment as a RIC.
65
Certain derivative investment by the Funds, such as exchange-traded and OTC derivatives may not produce qualifying income for purposes of the “Qualifying Income Test” described above, which must be met in order for a Fund to maintain its status as a RIC under the Code. In addition, the determination of the value and the identity of the issuer of such derivative investments are often unclear for purposes of the “Asset Test” described above. The Funds intend to carefully monitor such investments to ensure that any non-qualifying income does not exceed permissible limits and to ensure that they are adequately diversified under the Asset Test. The Funds, however, may not be able to accurately predict the non-qualifying income from these investments and there are no assurances that the IRS will agree with the Funds’ determination of the “Asset Test” with respect to such derivatives.
Each Fund is required for federal income tax purposes to mark-to-market and recognize as income for each taxable year its net unrealized gains and losses on certain futures and options contracts subject to section 1256 of the Code (“Section 1256 Contracts”) as of the end of the year as well as those actually realized during the year. Gain or loss from Section 1256 Contracts on broad-based indexes required to be marked to market will be 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gain or loss. Application of this rule may alter the timing and character of distributions to shareholders. A Fund may be required to defer the recognition of losses on Section 1256 Contracts to the extent of any unrecognized gains on offsetting positions held by the Fund. These provisions may also require the Funds to mark-to-market certain types of positions in their portfolios (i.e., treat them as if they were closed out), which may cause a Fund to recognize income without receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts necessary to satisfy the distribution requirement described above and for avoiding the excise tax discussed above. Accordingly, in order to avoid certain income and excise taxes, a Fund may be required to liquidate its investments at a time when the investment adviser might not otherwise have chosen to do so.
Offsetting positions held by a Fund involving certain derivative instruments, such as options, forwards, and futures, as well as its long and short positions in portfolio securities, may be considered to constitute “straddles” for federal income tax purposes. In general, straddles are subject to certain rules that may affect the amount, character and timing of a Fund’s gains and losses with respect to the straddle positions by requiring, among other things, that: (1) any loss realized on disposition of one position of a straddle may not be recognized to the extent that the Fund has unrealized gains with respect to the other positions in straddle; (2) the Fund’s holding period in straddle positions be suspended while the straddle exists (possibly resulting in a gain being treated as short-term rather than long-term capital gain); (3) the losses recognized with respect to certain straddle positions that are part of a mixed straddle and are non-Section 1256 Contracts be treated as 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital loss; (4) losses recognized with respect to certain straddle positions that would otherwise constitute short-term capital losses be treated as long-term capital losses; and (5) the deduction of interest and carrying charges attributable to certain straddle positions may be deferred. Various elections are available to the Funds, which may mitigate the effects of the straddle rules, particularly with respect to mixed straddles.
In general, the straddle rules described above do not apply to any straddles held by a Fund if all of the offsetting positions consist of Section 1256 Contracts. The straddle rules described above also do not apply if all the offsetting positions making up a straddle consist of one or more “qualified covered call options” and the stock to be purchased under the options and the straddle is not part of a larger straddle. A qualified covered call option is generally any option granted by a Fund to purchase stock it holds (or stock it acquires in connection with granting the option) if, among other things, (1) the option is traded on a national securities exchange that is registered with the SEC or other market the IRS determined has rules adequate to carry out the purposes of the applicable Code provision, (2) the option is granted more than 30 days before it expires, (3) the option is not a “deep-in-the-money option,” (4) such option is not granted by an options dealer in connection with the dealer’s activity of dealing in options, and (5) gain or loss with respect to the option is not ordinary income or loss. In addition, the straddle rules could cause distributions from a Fund that would otherwise constitute “qualified dividend income” or qualify for the dividends received deduction to fail to satisfy the applicable holding period requirements.
66
To the extent a Fund writes options that are not Section 1256 Contracts, the amount of the premium received by the Fund for writing such options is likely to be entirely short-term capital gain to the Fund. In addition, if such an option is closed by a Fund, any gain or loss realized by the Fund as a result of closing the transaction will also generally be short-term capital gain or loss. If such an option is exercised any gain or loss realized by the Fund upon the sale of the underlying security pursuant to such exercise will generally be short-term or long-term capital gain or loss to the Fund depending on the Fund’s holding period for the underlying security.
If a Fund enters into a “constructive sale” of any appreciated financial position in its portfolio, the Fund will be treated as if it had sold and immediately repurchased the property and must recognize gain (but not loss) with respect to that position. A constructive sale of an appreciated financial position occurs when a Fund enters into certain offsetting transactions with respect to the same or substantially identical property, including, but not limited to: (i) a short sale; (ii) an offsetting notional principal contract; (iii) a futures or forward contract; or (iv) other transactions identified in future Treasury Regulations. The character of the gain from constructive sales will depend upon a Fund’s holding period in the appreciated financial position. Losses realized from a sale of a position that was previously the subject of a constructive sale will be recognized when the position is subsequently disposed of. The character of such losses will depend upon a Fund’s holding period in the position beginning with the date the constructive sale was deemed to have occurred and the application of various loss deferral provisions in the Code. Constructive sale treatment does not apply to certain closed transactions, including if such a transaction is closed on or before the 30th day after the close of a Fund’s taxable year and the Fund holds the appreciated financial position unhedged throughout the 60-day period beginning with the day such transaction was closed.
With respect to investments in STRIPS, treasury receipts, and other zero coupon securities which are sold at original issue discount and thus do not make periodic cash interest payments, a Fund will be required to include as part of its current income the imputed interest on such obligations even though the Fund has not received any interest payments on such obligations during that period. Because each Fund intends to distribute all of its net investment income to its shareholders, a Fund may have to sell Fund securities to distribute such imputed income which may occur at a time when the Adviser would not have chosen to sell such securities and which may result in taxable gain or loss.
Any market discount recognized on a bond is taxable as ordinary income. A market discount bond is a bond acquired in the secondary market at a price below redemption value or adjusted issue price if issued with original issue discount. Absent an election by a Fund to include the market discount in income as it accrues, gain on the Fund’s disposition of such an obligation will be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gain to the extent of the accrued market discount.
A Fund may invest in inflation-linked debt securities. Any increase in the principal amount of an inflation-linked debt security will be original interest discount, which is taxable as ordinary income and is required to be distributed, even though the Fund will not receive the principal, including any increase thereto, until maturity. As noted above, if a Fund invests in such securities, it may be required to liquidate other investments, including at times when it is not advantageous to do so, in order to satisfy its distribution requirements and to eliminate any possible taxation at the Fund level.
67
If a Fund acquires an equity interest in certain foreign corporations (i) that receive at least 75% of their annual gross income from passive sources (such as interest, dividends, certain rents and royalties, or capital gains) or (ii) where at least 50% of the corporation’s assets (computed based on average fair market value) either produce or are held for the production of passive income (“PFICs”), the Fund could be subject to U.S. federal income tax and additional interest charges on “excess distributions” received from such companies or on gain from the sale of stock in such companies, even if all income or gain actually received by the Fund is timely distributed to its shareholders. A Fund would not be able to pass through to its shareholders any credit or deduction for such a tax. A “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”) election or a “mark to market” election may be available that would ameliorate these adverse tax consequences, but such elections could require the Fund to recognize taxable income or gain (subject to the distribution requirements applicable to RICs, as described above) without the concurrent receipt of cash. In order to satisfy the distribution requirements and avoid a tax on the Fund, the Fund may be required to liquidate portfolio securities that it might otherwise have continued to hold, potentially resulting in additional taxable gain or loss to the Fund. Gains from the sale of stock of PFICs may also be treated as ordinary income. In order for the Fund to make a qualified electing fund election with respect to a PFIC, the PFIC would have to agree to provide certain tax information to the Fund on an annual basis, which it might not agree to do. The Funds may limit and/or manage their holdings in PFICs to limit their tax liability or maximize its returns from these investments. A Fund’s income attributable to its investment in a PFIC that the Fund has elected to treat as a QEF is “qualifying income” to the Fund to the extent such income is derived with respect to the Fund’s business of investing in stock, securities or currencies, regardless of whether the PFIC makes a distribution equal to the amount included in income by the Fund.
Under Section 988 of the Code, gains or losses attributable to fluctuations in exchange rates which occur between the time the Fund accrues income or other receivables or accrues expenses or other liabilities denominated in a foreign currency and the time the Fund actually collects such income or receivables or pays such expenses or liabilities generally are treated as ordinary income or loss. Similarly, on disposition of debt securities denominated in a foreign currency and on disposition of certain other financial instruments (such as forward currency contracts and currency swaps), gains or losses attributable to fluctuations in the value of the foreign currency between the date of acquisition of the security or contract and the date of settlement or disposition are also treated as ordinary gain or loss. The gains and losses may increase or decrease the amount of the Fund’s income to be distributed to its shareholders as ordinary income. The Fund may elect out of the application of Section 988 of the Code with respect to the tax treatment of each of its foreign currency forward contracts to the extent that (i) such contract is a capital asset in the hands of the Fund and is not part of a straddle transaction and (ii) the Fund makes an election by the close of the day the contract is entered into to treat the gain or loss attributable to such contract as capital gain or loss.
The U.S. Treasury Department has authority to issue regulations that would exclude foreign currency gains from the Qualifying Income Requirement described above if such gains are not directly related to the Fund’s business of investing in stock or securities (or options and futures with respect to stock or securities). Accordingly, regulations may be issued in the future that could treat some or all of the Fund’s non-U.S. currency gains as non-qualifying income, thereby potentially jeopardizing the Fund’s status as a RIC for all years to which the regulations are applicable.
In general, for purposes of the Qualifying Income Test described above, income derived from a partnership will be treated as qualifying income only to the extent such income is attributable to items of income of the partnership that would be qualifying income if realized directly by a Fund. However, 100% of the net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (generally, a partnership (i) interests in which are traded on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof, (ii) that derives at least 90% of its income from the passive income sources specified in Section 7704(d) of the Code, and (iii) that generally derives less than 90% of its income from the same sources as described in the Qualifying Income Test) will be treated as qualifying income. In addition, although in general the passive loss rules of the Code do not apply to RICs, such rules do apply to a RIC with respect to items attributable to an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership.
68
A Fund may invest in certain MLPs which may be treated as “qualified publicly traded partnerships.” Income from qualified publicly traded partnerships is qualifying income for purposes of the Qualifying Income Test, but a Fund’s investment in one or more of such “qualified publicly traded partnerships” is limited under the Asset Test to no more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s assets. The Funds will monitor their investments in such qualified publicly traded partnerships in order to ensure compliance with the Qualifying Income and Asset Tests. MLPs and other partnerships that the Funds may invest in will deliver Schedules K-1 to the Funds to report their share of income, gains, losses, deductions and credits of the MLP or other partnership. These Schedules K-1 may be delayed and may not be received until after the time that a Fund issues its tax reporting statements. As a result, a Fund may at times find it necessary to reclassify the amount and character of its distributions to you after it issues you your tax reporting statement.
“Qualified publicly traded partnership income” within the meaning of Section 199A(e)(5) of the Code is eligible for a 20% deduction by non-corporate taxpayers. Qualified publicly traded partnership income is generally income of a “publicly traded partnership” that is not treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is effectively connected with such entity’s trade or business, but does not include certain investment income. A “publicly traded partnership” for purposes of this deduction is not necessarily the same as a “qualified publicly traded partnership” as defined for the purpose of the immediately preceding paragraphs. This deduction, if allowed in full, equates to a maximum effective tax rate of 29.6% (37% top rate applied to income after 20% deduction). The Code does not contain a provision permitting RICs, such as the Funds, to pass the special character of this income through to their shareholders. Currently, direct investors in entities that generate “qualified publicly traded partnership income” will enjoy the lower rate, but investors in RICs that invest in such entities will not.
A Fund may invest in U.S. REITs. Investments in REIT equity securities may require a Fund to accrue and distribute income not yet received. To generate sufficient cash to make the requisite distributions, a Fund may be required to sell securities in its portfolio (including when it is not advantageous to do so) that it otherwise would have continued to hold. A Fund’s investments in REIT equity securities may at other times result in a Fund’s receipt of cash in excess of the REIT’s earnings; if a Fund distributes these amounts, these distributions could constitute a return of capital to such Fund’s shareholders for federal income tax purposes. Dividends paid by a REIT, other than capital gain distributions, will be taxable as ordinary income up to the amount of the REIT’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (as calculated for federal income tax purposes). Capital gain dividends paid by a REIT to a Fund will be treated as long-term capital gains by the Fund and, in turn, may be distributed by the Fund to its shareholders as a capital gain distribution. Dividends received by a Fund from a REIT generally will not constitute qualified dividend income or qualify for the dividends received deduction. If a REIT is operated in a manner such that it fails to qualify as a REIT, an investment in the REIT would become subject to double taxation, meaning the taxable income of the REIT would be subject to federal income tax at the regular corporate rate without any deduction for dividends paid to shareholders and the dividends would be taxable to shareholders as ordinary income (or possibly as qualified dividend income) to the extent of the REIT’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (as calculated for federal income tax purposes).
“Qualified REIT dividends” (i.e., ordinary REIT dividends other than capital gain dividends and portions of REIT dividends designated as qualified dividend income eligible for capital gain tax rates) are eligible for a 20% deduction by non-corporate taxpayers. This deduction, if allowed in full, equates to a maximum effective tax rate of 29.6% (37% top rate applied to income after 20% deduction). Distributions by a Fund to its shareholders that are attributable to qualified REIT dividends received by such Fund and which the Fund properly reports as “section 199A dividends,” are treated as “qualified REIT dividends” in the hands of non-corporate shareholders. A section 199A dividend is treated as a qualified REIT dividend only if the shareholder receiving such dividend holds the dividend-paying RIC shares for at least 46 days of the 91-day period beginning 45 days before the shares become ex-dividend, and is not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to a position in substantially similar or related property. A Fund is permitted to report such part of its dividends as section 199A dividends as are eligible but is not required to do so.
69
REITs in which a Fund invests often do not provide complete and final tax information to the Funds until after the time that the Funds issue a tax reporting statement. As a result, a Fund may at times find it necessary to reclassify the amount and character of its distributions to you after it issues your tax reporting statement. When such reclassification is necessary, a Fund (or its administrative agent) will send you a corrected, final Form 1099-DIV to reflect the reclassified information. If you receive a corrected Form 1099-DIV, use the information on this corrected form, and not the information on the previously issued tax reporting statement, in completing your tax returns.
Domestic Subsidiaries
The Funds may invest up to 25% of their assets in one or more U.S. subsidiaries to enable it to indirectly make investments that would not generate qualifying income for a RIC. Any net income that such a subsidiary recognizes will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, but the dividends that the subsidiary pays to a Fund (i.e., those gains, net of the tax paid and any other expenses of the subsidiary, such as its management and advisory fees) may be eligible for the dividends received deduction (subject to certain limitations) applicable to corporate shareholders and individuals may be able to benefit from the lower tax rates available to qualified dividend income. Although it is possible that multiple subsidiaries may be required to be aggregated for purposes of the 25% value limit in the Asset Test, losses of one subsidiary will not offset income of another subsidiary.
Foreign Taxes
Dividends and interest a Fund receives on foreign investments may give rise to income withholding or other taxes imposed by foreign countries and U.S. possessions that would reduce the yield on the Fund’s stock or securities. Tax conventions between certain countries and the U.S. may reduce or eliminate such taxes. Foreign countries generally do not impose taxes on capital gains with respect to investments by foreign investors.
If more than 50% of a Fund’s total assets at the close of any taxable year consist of stock or securities of foreign corporations, the Fund may elect to pass through to its shareholders their pro rata shares of qualified foreign taxes paid by the Fund for that taxable year. If the Fund so elects, shareholders would be required to include a proportionate shares of those taxes in gross income as foreign taxes paid by them, and as described below may be entitled to a tax deduction for such taxes or a tax credit, subject to a holding period requirement and other limitations under the Code.
Qualified foreign taxes generally include taxes that would be treated as income taxes under U.S. tax regulations but do not include most other taxes, such as stamp taxes, securities transaction taxes, and similar taxes. If a Fund makes the election described above, shareholders may deduct their pro rata portion of qualified foreign taxes paid by the Fund for that taxable year in computing their income subject to U.S. federal income taxation or, alternatively, claim them as credits, subject to applicable limitations under the Code, against their U.S. federal income taxes. Shareholders who do not itemize deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes will not, however, be able to deduct their pro rata portion of qualified foreign taxes paid by the Fund, although such shareholders will be required to include their shares of such taxes in gross income if the Fund makes the election described above. No deduction for such taxes will be permitted to individuals in computing their alternative minimum tax liability.
70
If a Fund makes this election and a shareholder chooses to take a credit for the foreign taxes deemed paid by such shareholder, the amount of the credit that may be claimed in any year may not exceed the same proportion of the U.S. tax against which such credit is taken that the shareholder’s taxable income from foreign sources (but not in excess of the shareholder’s entire taxable income) bears to his entire taxable income. For this purpose, long-term and short-term capital gains a Fund realizes and distributes to shareholders will generally not be treated as income from foreign sources in their hands, nor will distributions of certain foreign currency gains or of any other income realized by the Fund that is deemed, under the Code, to be U.S.-source income in the hands of the Fund. This foreign tax credit limitation may also be applied separately to certain specific categories of foreign-source income and the related foreign taxes. As a result of these rules, which may have different effects depending upon each shareholder’s particular tax situation, certain shareholders may not be able to claim a credit for the full amount of their proportionate share of the foreign taxes paid by the Fund. Shareholders who are not liable for U.S. federal income taxes, including tax-exempt shareholders, will ordinarily not benefit from this election. If the Fund does make the election, it will provide required tax information to shareholders. The Fund generally may deduct any foreign taxes that are not passed through to its shareholders in computing its income available for distribution to shareholders to satisfy applicable tax distribution requirements.
Foreign tax credits, if any, received by a Fund as a result of an investment in underlying fund taxable as a RIC will not be passed through to you unless the Fund qualifies as a “qualified fund-of-funds” under the Code. If a Fund is a “qualified fund-of-funds” it will be eligible to file an election with the IRS that will enable the Fund to pass along these foreign tax credits to its shareholders. A Fund will be treated as a “qualified fund-of-funds” under the Code if at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets (at the close of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year) is represented by interests in other funds taxable as RICs.
Backup Withholding
Federal regulations generally require a Fund to withhold and remit to the U.S. Treasury a “backup withholding” tax with respect to reportable payments, including dividends, distributions from net capital gains, and the proceeds of any redemption paid to a shareholder if such shareholder fails to certify on IRS Form W-9, IRS Form W-8BEN, or other applicable form either that the Taxpayer Identification Number (“TIN”) furnished to the Fund is correct or that such shareholder has not received notice from the IRS of being subject to backup withholding. Furthermore, the IRS may notify a Fund to institute backup withholding if the IRS determines that a shareholder’s TIN is incorrect or if a shareholder has failed to properly report taxable dividends or interest on a federal tax return. A TIN is either the Social Security number or employer identification number of the record owner of the account. Any tax withheld as a result of backup withholding does not constitute an additional tax and may be claimed as a credit on the record owner’s timely filed federal income tax return. The backup withholding rate is currently 24%.
Foreign Shareholders
Foreign shareholders are generally subject to a 30% withholding tax, unless reduced or eliminated by treaty, on amounts treated as ordinary dividends from a Fund. Backup withholding will not be applied to payments that have been subject to this (or lower applicable treaty rate) withholding tax. Other rules may apply to foreign shareholders whose income from the Fund is effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business. Such investors should consult with their own advisers regarding those rules. A Fund may, under certain circumstances, report all or a portion of a dividend as an “interest-related dividend” or a “short-term capital gain dividend,” which would generally be exempt from this 30% U.S. withholding tax, provided certain other requirements are met. Short-term capital gain dividends received by a nonresident alien individual who is present in the U.S. for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the taxable year are not exempt from this 30% withholding tax. Gains realized by foreign shareholders from the sale or other disposition of shares of a Fund generally are not subject to U.S. taxation, unless the recipient is an individual who is physically present in the U.S. for 183 days or more per year.
71
Under legislation general known as “FATCA” (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act), unless certain foreign entities that hold Fund shares comply with IRS requirements that will generally require them to report information regarding U.S. persons investing in, or holding accounts with, such entities, a 30% withholding tax may apply to Fund distributions payable to such entities. In general, no such withholding will be required with respect to a U.S. person or non-U.S. person that timely provides the certifications required by a Fund or their agent on a valid IRS Form W-9 or applicable series of IRS Form W-8, respectively. Shareholders potentially subject to withholding include foreign financial institutions (“FFIs”), such as non-U.S. investment funds, and non-financial foreign entities (“NFFEs”). To avoid withholding under FATCA, an FFI generally must enter into an information sharing agreement with the IRS in which it agrees to report certain identifying information (including name, address, and taxpayer identification number) with respect to its U.S. account holders (which, in the case of an entity shareholder, may include its direct and indirect U.S. owners), and an NFFE generally must identify and provide other required information to the Funds or other withholding agent regarding its U.S. owners, if any. Such non-U.S. shareholders also may fall into certain exempt, excepted or deemed compliant categories as established by regulations and other guidance. A non-U.S. shareholder resident or doing business in a country that has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the U.S. to implement FATCA will be exempt from FATCA withholding provided that the shareholder and the applicable foreign government comply with the terms of the agreement.
A non-U.S. entity that invests in a Fund will need to provide such Fund with documentation properly certifying the entity’s status under FATCA in order to avoid FATCA withholding. Non-U.S. investors in the Funds should consult their tax advisors in this regard.
Tax-Exempt Shareholders
Certain tax-exempt shareholders, including qualified pension plans, individual retirement accounts, salary deferral arrangements, 401(k)s, and other tax-exempt entities, generally are exempt from federal income taxation except with respect to their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”). Tax-exempt entities are not permitted to offset losses from one trade or business against the income or gain of another trade or business. Certain net losses incurred prior to January 1, 2018 are permitted to offset gain and income created by an unrelated trade or business, if otherwise available. Under current law, the Funds generally serve to block UBTI from being realized by their tax-exempt shareholders. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, the tax-exempt shareholder could realize UBTI by virtue of an investment in a Fund where, for example: (i) the Fund invests in residual interests of Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (“REMICs”), (ii) the Fund invests in a REIT that is a taxable mortgage pool (“TMP”) or that has a subsidiary that is a TMP or that invests in the residual interest of a REMIC, or (iii) shares in the Fund constitute debt-financed property in the hands of the tax-exempt shareholder within the meaning of Section 514(b) of the Code. Charitable remainder trusts are subject to special rules and should consult their tax advisor. The IRS has issued guidance with respect to these issues and prospective shareholders, especially charitable remainder trusts, are strongly encouraged to consult their tax advisors regarding these issues.
The Funds’ shares held in a tax-qualified retirement account will generally not be subject to federal taxation on income and capital gains distributions from a Fund until a shareholder begins receiving payments from their retirement account. Because each shareholder’s tax situation is different, shareholders should consult their tax advisor about the tax implications of an investment in the Funds.
72
Tax Shelter Reporting Regulations
Under United States Treasury regulations, generally, if a shareholder recognizes a loss with respect to a Fund’s shares of $2 million or more for an individual shareholder, or $10 million or more for a corporate shareholder, in any single taxable year (or certain greater amounts over a combination of years), the shareholder must file with the IRS a disclosure statement on Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in many cases excepted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance, shareholders of a RIC are not excepted. Future guidance may extend the current exception from this reporting requirement to shareholders of most or all RICs. In addition, significant penalties may be imposed for the failure to comply with the reporting requirements. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.
State Taxes
Rules of state and local taxation of dividend and capital gains distributions from RICs often differ from the rules for federal income taxation described above. Distributions by any Fund to shareholders and the ownership of shares may be subject to state and local taxes. It is expected that no Fund will be liable for any corporate tax in Delaware if it qualifies as a RIC for federal income tax purposes.
Many states grant tax-free status to dividends paid to you from interest earned on direct obligations of the U.S. government, subject in some states to minimum investment requirements that must be met by a Fund. Investment in Ginnie Mae or Fannie Mae securities, banker’s acceptances, commercial paper, and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities do not generally qualify for such tax-free treatment.
The foregoing discussion regarding federal and state income taxation is for general information only. It is based on tax laws and regulations as in effect on the date of this SAI and is subject to change by legislative or administrative action. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers concerning the federal, state, local, and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the Fund.
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS AND BROKERAGE
Subject to the general supervision of the Board, the Adviser and sub-advisers are responsible for decisions to buy and sell securities for the Funds, the selection of brokers and dealers to effect the transactions, and the negotiation of brokerage commissions, if any. Purchases and sales of securities on a stock exchange are effected through brokers who charge a commission for their services. In the OTC market, securities are generally traded on a “net” basis, with dealers acting as principal for their own accounts without a stated commission, although the price of the security usually includes a profit to the dealer. In underwritten offerings, securities are purchased at a fixed price, which includes an amount of compensation to the underwriter, generally referred to as the underwriter’s concession or discount. Certain money market instruments may be purchased directly from an issuer, in which case no commission or discounts are paid. Fixed commissions on foreign stock-exchange transactions are generally higher than are negotiated commissions on domestic transactions. There is also generally less government supervision and regulation of foreign stock exchanges and brokers than in the United States.
The Adviser and sub-advisers may serve as an investment adviser to other clients. It is their practice to cause purchase and sale transactions to be allocated among the Funds and others whose assets they manage in such manner as they deem equitable. In making such allocations, the main factors considered are the respective investment objectives, the relative size of portfolio holdings of the same or comparable securities, the availability of cash for investment, the size of investment commitments generally held, and the opinions of the persons responsible for managing the Funds and the other client accounts. This procedure may, under certain circumstances, have an adverse effect on the Funds.
73
The policy of the Trust regarding purchases and sales of securities for the Funds is that primary consideration will be given to obtaining the most favorable prices and efficient executions of transactions. Consistent with this policy, when securities transactions are effected on a stock exchange, the Trust’s policy is to pay commissions that are considered fair and reasonable without necessarily determining that the lowest possible commissions are paid in all circumstances. The Adviser and sub-advisers believe that a requirement always to seek the lowest commission cost could impede effective management and preclude the Adviser or sub-advisers from obtaining high-quality brokerage and research services. In seeking to determine the reasonableness of brokerage commissions paid in any transaction, the Adviser and sub-advisers rely on their experience and knowledge regarding commissions generally charged by various brokers and on their judgment in evaluating the brokerage and research services received from the broker effecting the transaction.
In seeking to implement the Trust’s policies, the Adviser and sub-advisers effect transactions with brokers and dealers that they believe provide the most favorable prices and are capable of providing efficient executions. The Adviser and sub-advisers may place portfolio transactions with a broker or dealer that furnishes research and other services and may pay higher commissions to brokers in recognition of research provided (or direct the payment of commissions to such brokers). Such services may include, but are not limited to, any one or more of the following: (1) information as to the availability of securities for purchase or sale, (2) statistical or factual information or opinions pertaining to investments, (3) wire services, (4) and appraisals or evaluations of portfolio securities. The information and services received by the Adviser and sub-advisers from brokers and dealers may be of benefit in the management of accounts of other clients and may not in all cases benefit the Trust directly. While such services are useful and important in supplementing its own research and facilities, the Adviser and sub-advisers believe the value of such services is not determinable and does not significantly reduce its expenses.
For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Funds paid the following aggregate brokerage commissions:
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund | $83,995 | $68,576 | $173,510 |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund | $1,488 | $857 | $3,205 |
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | $50 | $10 | $90 |
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund | $40 | $40 | - |
Brokerage commissions paid by a Fund may be materially different from year to year for multiple reasons such as overall fund performance, market volatility, trading volumes, cash flows, or changes to the portfolio.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, the Equity Allocation Fund paid commissions totaling $13,196 on brokerage transactions totaling $58,619,987 with brokers providing research services.
DISTRIBUTION OF FUND SHARES
The Trust has adopted a Distribution Plan for Equity Allocation Fund’s Institutional Shares pursuant to which it may directly or indirectly bear expenses relating to the distribution and marketing of its shares, including payments to financial institutions and intermediaries for services in connection with distribution, the costs of preparing, printing, mailing or otherwise disseminating sales literature, advertising, and prospectuses to potential shareholders, and promotional and incentive programs. Continuance of the plan must be approved annually by a majority of the Trustees and by a majority of the Independent Trustees who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the plan or in any agreements related to the plan. The plan requires that quarterly written reports of amounts spent under the plan and the purposes of such expenditures be furnished to and reviewed by the Trustees. The plan may not be amended to increase materially the amount that may be spent there under without approval by a majority of the outstanding shares of the Trust. All material amendments of the plan require approval by a majority of the Trustees and of the Independent Trustees.
74
The Distribution Plan provides that Institutional Shares of the Equity Allocation Fund pay the Trust’s principal underwriter an annual fee of up to a maximum of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the shares. Under the plan, the principal underwriter may retain all or a part of this fee as compensation for distribution or shareholder services it provides or it may use such fees for compensation of broker/dealers and other financial institutions and intermediaries that provide distribution or shareholder services as specified by the principal underwriter. The plan is characterized as a compensation plan since the fee will be paid to the principal underwriter without regard to the distribution expenses it incurs or the amount of payments made to broker/dealers or other financial institutions and intermediaries.
PROXY VOTING PROCEDURES
Subject to the supervision of the Board, the Funds have delegated authority to vote proxies to the Adviser, which, as applicable, has delegated such authority to the sub-advisers with respect to the assets of the Funds each manages. The proxy voting policies and procedures of Allspring Investments, Aperio, GMO, MacKay Shields, Nuveen, and Wellington are attached as Appendix B.
The Municipal Bond Fund invests its assets primarily in municipal bonds. On rare occasions the Fund may acquire, directly or through a special purpose vehicle, equity securities of a municipal bond issuer whose bonds the Municipal Bond Fund already owns when such bonds have deteriorated or are expected shortly to deteriorate significantly in credit quality. The purpose of acquiring equity securities generally will be to acquire control of the municipal bond issuer and to seek to prevent the credit deterioration or facilitate the liquidation or other workout of the distressed issuer’s credit problem. In the course of exercising control of a distressed municipal issuer, the sub-advisers may pursue the Municipal Bond Fund’s interests in a variety of ways, which may entail negotiating and executing consents, agreements and other arrangements, and otherwise influencing the management of the issuer. The sub-advisers do not consider such activities proxy voting for purposes of Rule 206(4)-6 under the 1940 Act, but nevertheless provide reports to the Board on its control activities on a quarterly basis.
In the rare event that a municipal issuer were to issue a proxy or that the Municipal Bond Fund were to receive a proxy issued by a cash management security, the sub-advisers would either engage an independent third party to determine how the proxy should be voted or vote the proxy with the consent, or based on the instructions, of the Board or its representative. A member of each sub-adviser’s legal department would oversee the administration of the voting, and ensure that records were maintained in accordance with Rule 206(4)-6, reports were filed with the SEC on Form N-PX, and the results provided to the Board and made available to shareholders as required by applicable rules.
The Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund invest primarily in underlying funds. In the rare event that an underlying fund were to issue a proxy or that the Funds were to receive a proxy issued by a cash management security, the Adviser would either engage an independent third party to determine how the proxy should be voted or vote the proxy with the consent, or based on the instructions, of the Board or its representative. A member of the Adviser’s administration team would oversee the administration of the voting, and ensure that records were maintained in accordance with Rule 206(4)-6, reports were filed with the SEC on Form N-PX, and the results provided to the Board and made available to shareholders as required by applicable rules.
75
The same process described above for the Defensive Allocation Fund and Taxable Bond Fund would be applied by the Adviser with respect to assets of the Equity Allocation Fund and Municipal Bond Fund that it invests in underlying funds rather than allocating the assets to a sub-adviser.
Each year, the Funds make available the actual voting records relating to portfolio securities held by the Funds during the 12-month period ending June 30 without charge, upon request, by calling 1-877-997-9971 or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Description of Shares
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest, with or without par value. Currently, the Trust consists of three series of shares: Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund, representing two classes of shares, and Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund, Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund and Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund, each representing a single class of shares. However, the Board has the authority to establish additional series of shares (representing interests in separate investment portfolios of the Trust) and, subject to applicable rules, may establish additional classes of shares of any series, with the differences in classes representing differences as to certain expenses and share distribution arrangements. Shares are fully paid and non-assessable and have no pre-emptive or conversion rights.
Shareholders of all series of the Trust are entitled to vote together on the election or removal of Trustees and the ratification of the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm when shareholders vote on those matters. Shareholders are also entitled to vote on other matters as required by the 1940 Act, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust, the Trust’s By-Laws, or any registration of the Trust with the SEC or any state, or as the Trustees may consider necessary or desirable. On these other matters, shares of each Fund will generally vote as a separate class from any other series of the Trust’s shares. Each share (and fractional share) is entitled to one vote (or fraction thereof). However, if shares of more than one series vote together on a matter as a single class, each share (or fraction thereof) will be entitled to the number of votes that equals the net asset value of such share (or fraction thereof) determined as of the applicable record date.
Trustee and Officer Liability
Under the Trust’s Declaration of Trust and its By-Laws, and under Delaware law, the Trustees, officers, employees, and certain agents of the Trust are entitled to indemnification under certain circumstances against liabilities, claims, and expenses arising from any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding to which they are made parties by reason of the fact that they are or were such Trustees, officers, employees, or agents of the Trust, subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act that prohibit indemnification that would protect such persons against liabilities to the Trust or its shareholders to which they would otherwise be subject by reason of their own bad faith, willful misfeasance, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of duties.
76
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS
As of July 7, 2025, the following persons were the only persons who were record owners (or to the knowledge of the Trust, beneficial owners) of 5% or more of the shares of a Fund. Shareholders having more than 25% beneficial ownership of a Fund’s outstanding shares may be in control of the Fund and be able to affect the outcome of certain matters presented for a vote of shareholders.
Fund | Shareholder/Address | Percentage of Ownership |
Equity Allocation Fund – Advisor Shares | Charles Schwab & Co Attn Mutual Funds 211 Main St San Francisco CA 94105 |
91.43% |
Municipal Bond Fund | Charles Schwab & Co Attn Mutual Funds 211 Main St San Francisco CA 94105 |
95.55% |
Defensive Allocation Fund | Charles Schwab & Co Attn Mutual Funds 211 Main St San Francisco CA 94105 |
93.88% |
Taxable Bond Fund | Charles Schwab & Co Attn Mutual Funds 211 Main St San Francisco CA 94105 |
90.71% |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Funds’ audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, and the related report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, are incorporated by reference into this SAI from the Trust's Form N-CSR and are available without charge upon request by calling 1-877-997-9971 or visiting www.aspiriantfunds.com.
77
Appendix A
Ratings of Investments
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group — A brief description of the applicable Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) rating symbols and their meanings (as published by S&P) follows:
Issue Credit Ratings
A S&P issue credit rating is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations, or a specific financial program (including ratings on medium-term note programs and commercial paper programs). It takes into consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers, or other forms of credit enhancement on the obligation and takes into account the currency in which the obligation is denominated. The opinion reflects S&P’s view of the obligor’s capacity and willingness to meet its financial commitments as they come due, and may assess terms, such as collateral security and subordination, which could affect ultimate payment in the event of default.
Issue credit ratings can be either long term or short term. Short-term ratings are generally assigned to those obligations considered short-term in the relevant market. In the U.S., for example, that means obligations with an original maturity of no more than 365 days—including commercial paper. Short-term ratings are also used to indicate the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to put features on long-term obligations. The result is a dual rating, in which the short-term rating addresses the put feature, in addition to the usual long-term rating. Medium-term notes are assigned long-term ratings.
Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings
Issue credit ratings are based, in varying degrees, on S&P’s analysis of the following considerations:
1. | Likelihood of payment—capacity and willingness of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on an obligation in accordance with the terms of the obligation; |
2. | Nature of and provisions of the obligation and the promise S&P imputes; |
3. | Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors’ rights. |
Issue ratings are an assessment of default risk, but may incorporate an assessment of relative seniority or ultimate recovery in the event of default. Junior obligations are typically rated lower than senior obligations, to reflect the lower priority in bankruptcy, as noted above. (Such differentiation may apply when an entity has both senior and subordinated obligations, secured and unsecured obligations, or operating company and holding company obligations.)
AAA | An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong. |
AA | An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong. |
A-1
A | An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong. |
BBB | An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.
BB | An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
B | An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
CCC | An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. |
CC | An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. |
C | An obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared to obligations that are rated higher. |
D | An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due unless S&P believes that such payments will be made within five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. An obligation’s rating is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer. |
Plus (+) or Minus (–): The ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
NR | This indicates that no rating has been requested, that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that S&P does not rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy. |
A-2
Municipal Short-Term Note Ratings
A S&P U.S. municipal note rating reflects S&P’s opinion about the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to the notes. Notes due in three years or less will likely receive a note rating. Notes with an original maturity of more than three years will most likely receive a long-term debt rating. In determining which type of rating, if any, to assign, S&P’s analysis will review the following considerations:
● | Amortization schedule–the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note; and |
● | Source of payment–the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note. |
Note rating symbols are as follows:
SP-1 | Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation. |
SP-2 | Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes. |
SP-3 | Speculative capacity to pay principal and interest. |
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. — A brief description of the applicable Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) rating symbols and their meanings (as published by Moody’s) follows:
Long-Term Obligation Ratings
Aaa | Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk. |
Aa | Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk. |
A | Obligations rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk. |
Baa | Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics. |
Ba | Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk. |
B | Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk. |
Caa | Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk. |
Ca | Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest. |
C | Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest. |
A-3
Note: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.
Medium-Term Note Program Ratings
Moody’s assigns provisional ratings to medium-term note (MTN) programs and definitive ratings to the individual debt securities issued from them (referred to as drawdowns or notes).
MTN program ratings are intended to reflect the ratings likely to be assigned to drawdowns issued from the program with the specified priority of claim (e.g. senior or subordinated). To capture the contingent nature of a program rating, Moody’s assigns provisional ratings to MTN programs. A provisional rating is denoted by a (P) in front of the rating.
The rating assigned to a drawdown from a rated MTN or bank/deposit note program is definitive in nature, and may differ from the program rating if the drawdown is exposed to additional credit risks besides the issuer’s default, such as links to the defaults of other issuers, or has other structural features that warrant a different rating. In some circumstances, no rating may be assigned to a drawdown.
Moody’s encourages market participants to contact Moody’s Ratings Desks or visit www.moodys.com directly if they have questions regarding ratings for specific notes issued under a medium-term note program. Unrated notes issued under an MTN program may be assigned an NR (not rated) symbol.
U.S. Municipal Short-Term Debt and Demand Obligation Ratings
Short-Term Obligation Ratings
The Municipal Investment Grade (MIG) scale is used to rate US municipal bond anticipation notes of up to three years maturity. Municipal notes rated on the MIG scale may be secured by either pledged revenues or proceeds of a take-out financing received prior to note maturity. MIG ratings expire at the maturity of the obligation, and the issuer’s long-term rating is only one consideration in assigning the MIG rating. MIG ratings are divided into three levels—MIG 1 through MIG 3—while speculative grade short-term obligations are designated SG.
MIG 1 | This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing. |
MIG 2 | This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group. |
MIG 3 | This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established. |
SG | This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection. |
A-4
Demand Obligation Ratings
In the case of variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs), a two-component rating is assigned; a long or short-term debt rating and a demand obligation rating. The first element represents Moody’s evaluation of risk associated with scheduled principal and interest payments. The second element represents Moody’s evaluation of risk associated with the ability to receive purchase price upon demand (“demand feature”). The second element uses a rating from a variation of the MIG scale called the Variable Municipal Investment Grade (VMIG) scale.
VMIG 1 | This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand. |
VMIG 2 | This designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand. |
VMIG 3 | This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the satisfactory short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand. |
SG | This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Demand features rated in this category may be supported by a liquidity provider that does not have an investment grade short-term rating or may lack the structural and/or legal protections necessary to ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand. |
Fitch Ratings — A brief description of the applicable Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”) ratings symbols and meanings (as published by Fitch) follows:
Structured, Project & Public Finance Obligations—Long-Term Rating Scales
Ratings of structured finance, project finance and public finance obligations on the long-term scale, including the financial obligations of sovereigns, consider the obligations’ relative vulnerability to default. These ratings are typically assigned to an individual security or tranche in a transaction and not to an issuer.
AAA | Highest credit quality. ‘AAA’ ratings denote the lowest expectation of default risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events. |
AA | Very high credit quality. ‘AA’ ratings denote expectations of very low default risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events. |
A | High credit quality. ‘A’ ratings denote expectations of low default risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings. |
BBB | Good credit quality. ‘BBB’ ratings indicate that expectations of default risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity. |
A-5
BB | Speculative. ‘BB’ ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to default risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time. |
B | Highly speculative. ‘B’ ratings indicate that material default risk is present, but a limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met; however, capacity for continued payment is vulnerable to deterioration in the business and economic environment. |
CCC | Substantial credit risk. Default is a real possibility. |
CC | Very high levels of credit risk. Default of some kind appears probable. |
C | Exceptionally high levels of credit risk. Default appears imminent or inevitable. |
D | Default. Indicates a default. Default generally is defined as one of the following: |
● | failure to make payment of principal and/or interest under the contractual terms of the rated obligation; |
● | the bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other winding-up or cessation of the business of an issuer/obligor; or |
● | the distressed exchange of an obligation, where creditors were offered securities with diminished structural or economic terms compared with the existing obligation to avoid a probable payment default. |
Notes: In the case of structured and project finance, while the ratings do not address the loss severity given default of the rated liability, loss severity assumptions on the underlying assets are nonetheless typically included as part of the analysis. Loss severity assumptions are used to derive pool cash flows available to service the rated liability.
The suffix “sf’’ denotes an issue that is a structured finance transaction. For an explanation of how Fitch determines structured finance ratings, please see our criteria available at www.Fitchratings.com.
In the case of public finance, the ratings do not address the loss given default of the rated liability, focusing instead on the vulnerability to default of the rated liability.
The modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA’ Long-Term Rating category, or categories below ‘B’.
Limitations of the Structured, Project and Public Finance Obligation Rating Scale
Specific limitations relevant to the structured, project and public finance obligation rating scale include:
● | The ratings do not predict a specific percentage of default likelihood over any given time period. |
● | The ratings do not opine on the market value of any issuer’s securities or stock, or the likelihood that this value may change. |
● | The ratings do not opine on the liquidity of the issuer’s securities or stock. |
● | The ratings do not opine on the possible loss severity on an obligation should an obligation default. |
A-6
● | The ratings do not opine on any quality related to a transaction’s profile other than the agency’s opinion on the relative vulnerability to default of each rated tranche or security. |
Short-Term Ratings Assigned to Issuers or Obligations in Corporate, Public and Structured Finance
A short-term issuer or obligation rating is based in all cases on the short-term vulnerability to default of the rated entity or security stream and relates to the capacity to meet financial obligations in accordance with the documentation governing the relevant obligation. Short-Term Ratings are assigned to obligations whose initial maturity is viewed as “short term” based on market convention. Typically, this means up to 13 months for corporate, sovereign, and structured obligations, and up to 36 months for obligations in U.S. public finance markets.
F1 | Highest short-term credit quality. Indicates the strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added “+” to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature. |
F2 | Good short-term credit quality. Good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments. |
F3 | Fair short-term credit quality. The intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate. |
B | Speculative short-term credit quality. Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions. |
C | High short-term default risk. Default is a real possibility. |
RD | Restricted default. Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Applicable to entity ratings only. |
D | Default. Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation. |
Limitations of the Short-Term Ratings Scale
Specific limitations relevant to the Short-Term Ratings scale include:
● | The ratings do not predict a specific percentage of default likelihood over any given time period. |
● | The ratings do not opine on the market value of any issuer’s securities or stock, or the likelihood that this value may change. |
● | The ratings do not opine on the liquidity of the issuer’s securities or stock. |
● | The ratings do not opine on the possible loss severity on an obligation should an obligation default. |
● | The ratings do not opine on any quality related to an issuer or transaction’s profile other than the agency’s opinion on the relative vulnerability to default of the rated issuer or obligation. |
Ratings assigned by Fitch Ratings articulate an opinion on discrete and specific areas of risk. The above list is not exhaustive, and is provided for the reader’s convenience.
A-7
Appendix B
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 1, 2022
Allspring Global Investments (Allspring) Stewardship
As fiduciaries, we are committed to effective stewardship of the assets we manage on behalf of our clients. To us, good stewardship reflects responsible, active ownership and includes both engaging with investee companies and voting proxies in a manner that we believe will maximize the long-term value of our investments.
Scope of Policies and Procedures
In conjunction with the Allspring Engagement Policy, these Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Policies and Procedures”) set out how Allspring complies with applicable regulatory requirements in respect of how we exercise voting rights when we invest in shares traded on a regulated market on behalf of a client.
With respect to client accounts of Allspring Funds Management, LLC (“Allspring Funds Management”) this includes, among others, Allspring Funds Trust, Allspring Master Trust, Allspring Variable Trust, Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Allspring Income Opportunities Fund, Allspring Multi-Sector Income Fund, Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (the “Trusts”). It also includes Allspring (Lux) Worldwide Fund and Allspring Worldwide Alternative Fund SICAV-SIF, both domiciled in Luxembourg (the “Luxembourg Funds”). Aside from the investment funds managed by Funds Management, Allspring also offers medium term note programs, managed for issuers of such notes domiciled in Luxembourg. Hereafter, all series of the Trusts, and all such Trusts not having separate series, and all sub-funds of the Luxembourg Funds, as well as the MTN issuers, are referred to as the “Investment Products”. In addition, these Policies and Procedures are used to determine how to vote proxies for the assets managed on behalf of Allspring’s other clients. Not all clients delegate proxy voting authority to Allspring. Allspring will not vote proxies or provide advice to clients on how to vote proxies in the absence of specific delegation of authority, a pre-existing contractual agreement, or an obligation under applicable law (e.g., securities that are held in an investment advisory account for which Allspring exercises no investment discretion are not voted by Allspring).
Luxembourg Products
Allspring Global Investments Luxembourg S.A. (“Allspring Luxembourg”) has delegated the portfolio management of the Luxembourg Funds it manages to Allspring and the responsibility for exercising voting rights in conjunction with such delegation; as such, these Policies and Procedures shall apply to the portfolio management of the Allspring (Lux) Worldwide Fund. The respective portfolio management may also delegate the responsibility for exercising voting rights to the Proxy Voting Vendor, with the prior consent of Allspring Luxembourg. Responsibility for exercising voting rights has also been delegated to Allspring with respect to the Allspring Worldwide Alternative Fund SICAV-SIF and to the MTN issuers.
Voting Philosophy
Allspring has adopted these Policies and Procedures to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interests of clients and Investment Product investors, without regard to any relationship that any affiliated person of Allspring or the Investment Product (or an affiliated person of such affiliated person) may have with the issuer. Allspring exercises its voting responsibility as a fiduciary with the goal of maximizing value to clients consistent with governing laws and the investment policies of each client. While securities are not purchased to exercise control or to seek to effect corporate change through share ownership activism, Allspring supports sound corporate governance practices at companies in which client assets are invested. Allspring has established an appropriate strategy determining when and how the voting rights related to the instruments held in portfolios managed are exercised, so that these rights are exclusively reserved to the relevant Investment Product and its investors.
B-1
Proxy Administrator
Allspring’s Operations Department (“Proxy Administrator”) administers the proxy voting process. The Proxy Administrator, reports to Allspring’s Chief Operations Officer. The Proxy Administrator is responsible for administering and overseeing the proxy voting process to ensure the implementation of the Policies and Procedures, including regular operational reviews, typically conducted on a weekly basis. The Proxy Administrator monitors third party voting of proxies to ensure it is being done in a timely and responsible manner, including review of scheduled vendor reports. The Proxy Administrator in conjunction with the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee reviews the continuing appropriateness of the Policies and Procedures set forth herein, and recommends revisions as necessary.
Third Party Proxy Voting Vendor
Allspring has retained a third-party proxy voting service, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), to assist in the implementation of certain proxy voting-related functions including: 1.) Providing research on proxy matters 2.) Providing technology to facilitate the sharing of research and discussions related to proxy votes 3.) Vote proxies in accordance with Allspring’s guidelines 4.) Handle administrative and reporting items 5.) Maintain records of proxy statements received in connection with proxy votes and provide copies/analyses upon request. Except in instances where clients have retained voting authority, Allspring retains the responsibility for proxy voting decisions.
Proxy Committee
Allspring Proxy Governance Committee
The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee shall be responsible for overseeing the proxy voting process to ensure its implementation in conformance with these Policies and Procedures. The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee shall coordinate with Allspring Compliance to monitor ISS, the proxy voting agent currently retained by Allspring, to determine that ISS is accurately applying the Policies and Procedures as set forth herein and operates as an independent proxy voting agent. Allspring’s ISS Vendor Oversight process includes an assessment of ISS’ Policy and Procedures (“P&P”), including conflict controls and monitoring, receipt and review of routine performance-related reporting by ISS to Allspring and periodic onsite due diligence meetings. Due diligence meetings typically include: meetings with key staff, P&P related presentations and discussions, technology-related demonstrations and assessments, and some sample testing, if appropriate. The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee shall review the continuing appropriateness of the Policies and Procedures set forth herein. The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee may delegate certain powers and responsibilities to proxy voting working groups. The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee reviews and, in accordance with these Policies and Procedures, votes on issues that have been escalated from proxy voting working groups. Members of the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee also oversee the implementation of Allspring Proxy Governance Committee recommendations for the respective functional areas in Allspring that they represent.
Proxy Voting Due Diligence Working Group
Among other delegated matters, the proxy voting Due Diligence Working Group (‘DDWG’) in accordance with these Policies and Procedures, reviews and votes on routine proxy proposals that it considers under these Policies and Procedures in a timely manner. If necessary, the DDWG escalates issues to the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee that are determined to be material by the DDWG or otherwise in accordance with these Policies and Procedures. The DDWG coordinates with Allspring’s Investment Analytics and Compliance teams to review the performance and independence of ISS in exercising its proxy voting responsibilities.
B-2
Meetings; Committee Actions
The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee shall convene or act through written consent, including through the use of electronic systems of record, of a majority of Allspring Proxy Governance Committee members as needed and when discretionary voting determinations need to be considered. Any working group of the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee shall have the authority on matters delegated to it to act by vote or written consent, including through the use of electronic systems of record, of a majority of the working group members available at that time. The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee shall also meet quarterly to review the Policies and Procedures.
Membership
Members are selected based on subject matter expertise for the specific deliverables the committee is required to complete. The voting members of the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee are identified in the Allspring Proxy Charter. Changes to the membership of the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee will be made only with approval of the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee. Upon departure from Allspring Global Investments, a member’s position on the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee will automatically terminate.
Voting Procedures
Unless otherwise required by applicable law,1 proxies will be voted in accordance with the following steps and in the following order of consideration:
1. | First, any voting items related to Allspring “Top-of-House” voting principles (as described below under the heading “Allspring Proxy Voting Principles/Guidelines”) will generally be voted in accordance with a custom voting policy with ISS (“Custom Policy”) designed to implement the Allspring’s Top-of-House voting principles.2 |
2. | Second, any voting items for meetings deemed of “high importance”3 (e.g., proxy contests, significant transactions such as mergers and acquisitions) where ISS opposes management recommendations will be referred to the Portfolio Management teams for recommendation or the DDWG (or escalated to the Allspring Proxy Governance -Committee) for case-by-case review and vote determination. |
1 | Where provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) specify the manner in which items for any third party registered investment companies (e.g., mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and closed-end funds) and business development companies (as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the 1940 Act) (“Third Party Fund Holding Voting Matters”) held by the Trusts or series thereof, Allspring shall vote the Third Party Fund Holding Voting Matter on behalf of the Trusts or series thereof accordingly. |
2 | The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee may determine that additional review of a Top-of-House voting matter is warranted. For example, voting matters for declassified boards or annual election of directors of public operating and holding companies that have certain long-term business commitments (e.g., developing proprietary technology; or having an important strategic alliance in place) may warrant referral to the DDWG (or escalation to the Proxy Governance Committee) for case-by-case review and vote determination. |
3 | The term “high importance” is defined as those items designated Proxy Level 6 or 5 by ISS, which include proxy contests and significant transactions such as mergers and acquisitions. |
3. | Third, with respect to any voting items where ISS Sustainability Voting Guidelines4 provide a different recommendation than ISS Standard Voting Guidelines, the following steps are taken: |
B-3
a. | The Allspring Investment Analytics team5 evaluates the matter for materiality and any other relevant considerations. |
b. | If the Investment Analytics team recommends further review, the voting item is then referred to the Portfolio Management teams for recommendation or the DDWG (or escalated to the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee) for case-by-case review and vote determination. |
c. | If the Investment Analytics team does not recommend further review, the matter is voted in accordance with ISS Standard Voting Guidelines. |
4. | Fourth, any remaining proposals are voted in accordance with ISS Standard Voting Guidelines.6 |
Commitment to the Principles of Responsible Investment
As a signatory to the Principles for Responsible Investment, Allspring has integrated certain material environmental, social, and governance factors into its investment processes, which includes the proxy process. As described under Voting Procedures above, Allspring considers ISS’s Sustainability Voting Guidelines as a point of reference in certain cases deemed to be material to a company’s long-term shareholder value.
Voting Discretion
In all cases, the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee (and any working group thereof) will exercise its voting discretion in accordance with the voting philosophy of these Policies and Procedures. In cases where a proxy item is forwarded by ISS to the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee or a working group thereof, the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee or its working group may be assisted in its voting decision through receipt of: (i) independent research and voting recommendations provided by ISS or other independent sources; (ii) input from the investment sub-adviser responsible for purchasing the security; and (iii) information provided by company management and shareholder groups.
Portfolio Manager and Sub-Adviser Input
The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee (and any working group thereof) may consult with portfolio management teams and Fund sub-advisers on specific proxy voting issues as it deems appropriate. In addition, portfolio management teams or Fund sub-advisers may proactively make recommendations to the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee regarding any proxy voting issue. In this regard, the process takes into consideration expressed views of portfolio management teams and Fund sub-advisers given their deep knowledge of investee companies. For any proxy vote, portfolio management teams and Investment Product advisers and sub-advisers may make a case to vote against the ISS or Allspring Proxy Governance Committee’s recommendation (which is described under Voting Procedures above). Any portfolio management team’s or Investment Product adviser’s or sub-adviser’s opinion should be documented in a brief write-up for consideration by the DDWG who will determine, or escalate to the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee, the final voting decision.
4 | ISS’s Sustainability Voting Guidelines seeks to promote support for recognized global governing bodies encouraging sustainable business practices advocating for stewardship of environment, fair labor practices, non-discrimination, and the protection of human rights. |
5 | The Investment Analytics team comprises of approximately 35 team members, focused on equity and fixed income risk analytics, mutual fund risk analytics, counterparty risk analytics, model documentation, scientific learning and portfolio analytics (including portfolio characteristics, portfolio construction research, multi-asset class risk analytics, and ESG analytics). The team and its processes serve a similar function as an investment risk committee and reports into the Allspring Chief Investment Officer(s). |
6 | The voting of proxies for Taft Hartley clients may incorporate the use of ISS’s Taft Hartley voting guidelines. |
B-4
Consistent Voting
Proxies will be voted consistently on the same matter when securities of an issuer are held by multiple client accounts unless there are special circumstances such as, for example, proposals concerning corporate actions such as mergers, tender offers, and acquisitions or as reasonably necessary to implement specified proxy voting guidelines as established by a client (e.g. Taft Hartley ISS Guidelines or custom proxy guidelines).
Governance and Oversight
Allspring Top-of-House Proxy Voting Principles/Guidelines.
The following reflects Allspring’s Top-of-House Voting Principles in effect as of the date of these Policies and Procedures. Allspring has put in place a custom voting policy with ISS to implement these voting principles.
We believe that Boards of Directors of investee companies should have strong, independent leadership and should adopt structures and practices that enhance their effectiveness. We recognize that the optimal board size and governance structure can vary by company size, industry, region of operations, and circumstances specific to the company.
● | We generally vote for the election of Directors in uncontested elections. We reserve the right to vote on a case-by-case basis when directors fail to meet their duties as a board member, such as failing to act in the best economic interest of shareholders; failing to maintain independent audit, compensation, nominating committees; and failing to attend at least 75% of meetings, etc. |
● | We generally vote for an independent board that has a majority of outside directors who are not affiliated with the top executives and have minimal or no business dealings with the company to avoid potential conflicts of interests. |
● | Generally speaking, we believe Directors serving on an excessive number of boards could result in time constraints and an inability to fulfill their duties. |
● | We generally support adopting a declassified board structure for public operating and holding companies. We reserve the right to vote on a case-by-case basis when companies have certain long-term business commitments. |
● | We generally support annual election of directors of public operating and holding companies. We reserve the right to vote on a case-by-case basis when companies have certain long-term business commitments. |
● | We believe a well-composed board should embody multiple dimensions of diversity in order to bring personal and professional experiences to bear and create a constructive debate of competing perspectives and opinions in the boardroom. Diversity should consider factors such as gender, ethnicity, and age as well as professional factors such as area of expertise, industry experience and geographic location. |
We believe it is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to create, enhance, and protect shareholder value and that companies should strive to maximize shareholder rights and representation.
● | We believe that companies should adopt a one-share, one-vote standard and avoid adopting share structures that create unequal voting rights among their shareholders. We will normally support proposals seeking to establish that shareholders are entitled to voting rights in proportion to their economic interests |
● | We believe that directors of public operating and holding companies be elected by a majority of the shares voted. We reserve the right to vote on a case-by-case basis when companies have certain long-term business commitments. This ensures that directors of public operating and holding companies who are not broadly supported by shareholders are not elected to serve as their representatives. We will normally support proposals seeking to introduce bylaws requiring a majority vote standard for director elections. |
B-5
● | We believe a simple majority voting standard should be required to pass proposals. We will normally support proposals seeking to introduce bylaws requiring a simple majority vote. |
● | We believe that shareholders who own a meaningful stake in the company and have owned such stake for a sufficient period of time should have, in the form of proxy access, the ability to nominate directors to appear on the management ballot at shareholder meetings. In general we support market-standardized proxy access proposals and we will analyze them based on various criteria such as threshold ownership levels, a minimum holding period, and the % and/or number of directors that are subject to nomination. |
● | We believe that shareholders should have the right to call a special meeting and not wait for company management to schedule a meeting if there is sufficiently high shareholder support for doing so on issues of substantial importance. In general we support the right to call a special meeting if there is balance between a reasonable threshold of shareholders and a hurdle high enough to also avoid the waste of corporate resources for narrowly supported interests. We will evaluate the issues of importance on the basis of serving all shareholders well and not structured for the benefit of a dominant shareholder over others. |
Practical Limitations to Proxy Voting
While Allspring uses its reasonable best efforts to vote proxies, in certain circumstances, it may be impractical or impossible for Allspring to vote proxies (e.g., limited value or unjustifiable costs).
Securities on Loan
As a general matter, securities on loan will not be recalled to facilitate proxy voting (in which case the borrower of the security shall be entitled to vote the proxy). However, as it relates to portfolio holdings of the Investment Products, if the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee is aware of an item in time to recall the security and has determined in good faith that the importance of the matter to be voted upon outweighs the loss in lending revenue that would result from recalling the security (e.g., if there is a controversial upcoming merger or acquisition, or some other significant matter), the security will be recalled for voting.
Share Blocking
Proxy voting in certain countries requires ‘share blocking’. Shareholders wishing to vote their proxies must deposit their shares with a designated depository before the date of the meeting. Consequently, the shares may not be sold in the period preceding the proxy vote. Absent compelling reasons, Allspring believes that the benefit derived from voting these shares is outweighed by the burden of limited trading.
Therefore, if share blocking is required in certain markets, Allspring will not participate and will refrain from voting proxies for those clients impacted by share blocking.
Conflicts of Interest
We always seek to place the interests of our clients first and to identify and manage any conflicts of interest, including those that arise from proxy voting or engagement. Allspring acts as a fiduciary with respect to its asset management activities and therefore we must act in the best interest of our clients and address conflicts that arise.
Conflicts of interest are identified and managed through a strict and objective application of our voting policy and procedures. Allspring may have a conflict of interest regarding a proxy to be voted upon if, for example, Allspring or its affiliates (such as a sub-adviser or principal underwriter) have other relationships with the issuer of the proxy. This type of conflict is generally mitigated by the information barriers between Allspring and its affiliates and our commitment as a fiduciary to independent judgement. However, when the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee becomes aware of a conflict of interest (that gets uncovered through the Allspring Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures), it takes additional steps to mitigate the conflict, by using any of the following methods:
B-6
1. | Instructing ISS to vote in accordance with its recommendation; |
2. | Disclosing the conflict to the relevant Board and obtaining its consent before voting; |
3. | Submitting the matter to the relevant Board to exercise its authority to vote on such matter; |
4. | Engaging an independent fiduciary who will direct the vote on such matter, |
5. | Consulting with Legal and Compliance and, if necessary, outside legal counsel for guidance on resolving the conflict of interest, |
6. | Voting in proportion to other shareholders ("mirror voting") following consultation with the Board of the Funds if the conflict pertains to a matter involving a portfolio holding of the Funds; or |
7. | Voting in other ways that are consistent with Allspring’s obligation to vote in the best interests of its clients. |
Vendor Oversight
The Allspring Proxy Administrator monitors the ISS proxy process against specific criteria in order to identify potential issues relating to account reconciliation, unknown and rejected ballot reviews, upcoming proxy reviews, share reconciliation oversight, etc. With respect to ISS’s management of its potential conflicts of interest with corporate issuers, ISS provides institutional clients such as Allspring with its “Policy and disclosure of Significant ISS Relationships” and tools to provide transparency of those relationships.
Other Provisions
Policy Review and Ad Hoc Meetings
The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee meets at least annually to review this Policy and consider any appropriate changes. Meetings may be convened more frequently (for example, to discuss a specific proxy agenda or proposal) as requested by the Manager of Proxy Administrator, any member of the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee, or Chief Compliance Officer. The Allspring Proxy Governance Committee includes representation from Portfolio Management, Operations, Investment Analytics and, in a non-voting consultative capacity, Compliance.
Records Retention
The Allspring Proxy Administrator will maintain the following records relating to the implementation of the Policies and Procedures:
● | A copy of these proxy voting policies and procedures; |
● | Proxy statements received for client securities (which will be satisfied by relying on ISS); Records of votes cast on behalf of Investment Products and separate account clients (which ISS maintains on behalf of Allspring); and |
● | Any documents prepared by Allspring or ISS that were material to making a proxy voting decision. |
Such proxy voting books and records shall be maintained at an office of Allspring in an easily accessible place for a period of six years.
Compliance with Regional Regulations and Client Delegation Arrangements
U.S. Regulation
These Policies and Procedures have been written in compliance with Rule 206(4)-6 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Proxy voting records for Allspring’s mutual funds are disclosed on Form N-PX annually, as required by Section 30 and Rule 30b1-4 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
B-7
E.U. Regulation
These Policies and Procedures have been established, implemented and maintained, as they apply to Allspring Luxembourg and Allspring Global Investments (UK) Limited, in accordance the EU Shareholder Rights Directive II (EU 2017/828) (SEF II). Specific to Allspring Luxembourg, the Policies and Procedures also comply with Article 23 of CSSF Regulation No. 10-4, and the CSSF Circular 18/698.
Disclosure of policies and procedures
A summary of the proxy voting policy and procedures are disclosed on Allspring’s website.
In addition, Allspring will disclose to its separate clients (i.e. proxy votes for assets managed on behalf of Allspring’s other clients as per a delegation arrangement) a summary description of its proxy voting policy and procedures via mail.
Disclosure of proxy voting results
Allspring will provide to clients proxy statements and any records as to how Allspring voted proxies on behalf of clients, quarterly or upon request. For assistance, clients may contact their relationship manager, call Allspring at 1-800-259-3305 or e-mail: allspring.clientadministration@asllspring-global.com to request a record of proxies voted on their behalf.
Allspring will publish high-level proxy voting statistics in periodic reports. However, except as otherwise required by law, Allspring has a general policy of not disclosing to any issuer specific or third party how its separate account client proxies are voted.
Approved by the Allspring Proxy Governance Committee: March 1, 2022
B-8
Aperio Group, LLC, Proxy Voting Policy
March 2025
B-9
1. | Summary |
Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Rule”) requires every investment advisor who exercises voting authority with respect to client securities to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that an advisor votes proxies in the best interest of its clients (“Proxy Voting Policy”). The procedures must address material conflicts that may arise in connection with proxy voting. The Rule further requires an advisor to provide a concise summary of the advisor’s proxy voting process and offer to provide copies of the complete Proxy Voting Policy and procedures to clients upon request. Lastly, the Rule requires that the advisor disclose to clients how they may obtain information on how the advisor voted their proxies.
Aperio has written agreements with its advisory and sub-advisory clients that generally grant us authority to vote all proxies on behalf of the Client accounts we advise. Aperio will vote proxies for clients in each client’s best interest, following the proxy voting guideline profile for each portfolio, with some exceptions from the profile noted below. Clients may opt to retain responsibility for voting proxies directly or through another service.
For those clients who have delegated to Aperio proxy voting authority, Aperio has established default proxy voting guidelines for its strategies, as described more fully below. Clients may generally select a non-default proxy policy option, with certain Wrap Program platform exceptions noted below.
Aperio offers a selection of proxy voting guideline options. Starting in late March 2025, Aperio will begin the transition of all proxy voting implementation to Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”). At the conclusion of this transition, all proxy voting guidelines offered will be implemented by ISS, a third-party proxy service provider with whom Aperio and/or BlackRock have contracted. Clients who delegate proxy voting authority to Aperio may be able to select from BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “BAIS Guidelines”) or select other proxy voting guidelines from Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) as described below.
Prior to April 2025, Aperio offered the Aperio Governance Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Governance Guidelines”), implemented by another third-party proxy service provider, Broadridge Financial Solutions (“Broadridge”). All current clients using the Governance Guidelines will be moved to the BAIS Guidelines beginning in late March 2025.
Clients interested in creating custom proxy voting guidelines, which differ from Aperio’s currently available proxy voting guidelines, may consult with Aperio for development of alternative guidelines at potential additional cost.
Aperio, in its Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, discloses general information about these policies and procedures and how clients may obtain information on how Aperio voted their proxies, when applicable. At any time, a client may contact Aperio to request information about how and whether it voted proxies for their securities.
B-10
2. | Proxy Voting Committee |
Aperio’s Proxy Voting Policy is evaluated and maintained by the Aperio Proxy Voting Committee, which oversees proxy voting activities for clients who have delegated such authority to Aperio. The Proxy Voting Committee maintains this Proxy Voting Policy, monitors for potential conflicts of interest, and monitors our third-party proxy service provider(s). The Proxy Voting Committee must approve any changes to the proxy voting guidelines offered and the selection of other third-party proxy vote service providers.
Unless the power to vote proxies for a client is reserved to that client (or in the case of an employee benefit plan, the plan’s trustee or other fiduciaries), the Proxy Voting Committee will designate one or more Aperio or BlackRock employees to (1) coordinate with our third-party proxy service provider(s) to ensure voting of proxies are in line with each account’s proxy guidelines profile for those accounts set up with that service provider; (2) use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that paper ballots during the setup period ( the “Proxy Setup Period”) are voted (see ”Proxy Voting Implementation”); and (3) determine whether it is in the client’s best interest not to vote or abstain from voting a proxy. Those employees conducting this function will report to the Proxy Voting Committee on a periodic basis outlining the issues faced in the above roles.
Periodically, the Proxy Voting Committee, through a designated person or persons, will ensure that a review is conducted to:
● | Verify that eligible proxies for the securities held in clients’ accounts managed by Aperio have been received and voted (or not voted, as applicable) in a manner consistent with the Proxy Voting Policy and, as applicable, the default or other client-selected proxy guidelines; |
● | Review the electronic files available from the vote service provider to verify that records of the voting of the proxies have been properly maintained; |
● | Periodically perform a due diligence review of the third-party service provider(s) to help ensure that all potential and actual material conflicts have been identified and appropriately processed/disclosed; and |
● | Review proxy voting guidelines at least annually, as well as when known new issues arise or circumstances materially change. |
3. Transition to BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship Proxy Voting Guidelines from the Governance Proxy Voting Guidelines
Through April 20, 2025, Aperio retained Broadridge to assist in coordinating and voting client proxies for application of the Governance Guidelines. The Governance Guidelines used Broadridge’s Shareholder Value guidelines as a basis, with additional modifications added by Aperio. The Governance Guidelines generally recommended casting proxy votes in favor of proposals that Broadridge and Aperio believed may increase shareholder value and generally recommended against proposals deemed to have the opposite effect.
The Governance Guidelines were previously available for clients to choose and were generally the default option for accounts that did not use Aperio’s values-aligned strategies and did not select different proxy voting guidelines (with exceptions for select Wrap Programs). These guidelines will be retired and will no longer be available for clients to choose beginning late March 2025.
B-11
In late March 2025, Aperio will begin the process of transitioning all accounts using the Governance Guidelines to the BAIS Guidelines, which will commence a transition period for client accounts to be transferred to the BAIS Guidelines.
The Governance Guidelines and the BAIS Guidelines are different in several respects. The Governance Guidelines are more rules-based and their recommendations follow specific voting guidelines. In contrast, the BAIS Guidelines, which are designed and implemented by BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship through ISS, are less rules-based and voting recommendations are determined on a case-by-case basis, in the context of a company’s situation. For example, the Governance Guidelines generally support shareholder proposals that request transparency, but do not support policy change. In contrast, the BAIS Guidelines may vote to support a shareholder proposal if the BlackRock Active Investment Stewardship team has concerns about how a company is managing or disclosing its approach to material sustainability-related risks.
Beginning late March 2025, the BAIS Guidelines will be the default option for accounts that do not use Aperio’s values-aligned strategies and do not select different proxy voting guidelines, and for clients (including those clients using Aperio’s values-aligned strategies) in certain Wrap Program platforms.
4. ISS Proxy Voting Guidelines
Aperio offers clients several additional proxy voting guideline options through ISS, including:
● | ISS SRI Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “SRI Guidelines”), |
● | ISS Catholic Faith-Based Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Catholic Guidelines”), |
● | ISS Benchmark Proxy Voting Guidelines, |
● | ISS Global Board-Aligned Proxy Voting Guidelines, |
● | ISS Sustainability Proxy Voting Guidelines, |
● | ISS Public Fund Proxy Voting Guidelines, and |
● | ISS Taft-Hartley Proxy Voting Guidelines. |
From time to time, additional proxy voting guidelines may be used to support clients at their request.
ISS regularly updates its proxy voting guidelines, generally on an annual basis. Aperio reviews these guidelines at least annually to ensure they are in line with our clients’ best interests.
Aperio reserves the right, subject to Proxy Voting Committee approval, to modify, add additional, or change the proxy voting guidelines it offers clients, as well as change or add third-party proxy voting service provider(s).
B-12
5. Default Proxy Voting Guidelines
Aperio generally establishes default proxy voting guidelines for its strategies, which will be used unless the client selects different proxy voting guidelines. For non-values-aligned strategies, the default proxy voting guidelines have generally been the Governance Guidelines (with certain exceptions noted below). Beginning late March 2025, the BAIS Guidelines will generally be the default proxy voting guidelines for these non-values-aligned accounts.
For clients who select Aperio’s Catholic Values strategies for their portfolios, the default proxy guidelines are the Catholic Guidelines.
For other values-aligned strategies, the default proxy voting guidelines are generally the SRI Guidelines. Clients may generally select proxy voting guidelines that differ from the default of their chosen strategy. In some cases, depending on the client’s custodian and other factors, additional costs may apply.
For certain clients, including some Wrap Program Clients, where implementing the foregoing default proxy voting guidelines is costly or operationally burdensome, Aperio may implement different default proxy voting guidelines. For example, Aperio has implemented the SRI Guidelines as default proxy voting guidelines for all portfolios, including accounts in non-values-aligned strategies, for certain Wrap Programs.
Clients may generally select an alternative to the default proxy guidelines. Certain Wrap Sponsors may limit Wrap Program Client choice of proxy guidelines.
For certain turnkey asset management programs (TAMP) and other platforms, Aperio may not be granted direct authority to vote proxies for Client accounts. In instances where the TAMP or platform is authorized to vote proxies for Client accounts, and subject to mutual agreement with Aperio, such TAMP or platform may choose to vote proxies in accordance with Aperio default proxy voting guidelines, which may include the BAIS Guidelines or other selected proxy voting guidelines.
6. Proxy Voting Implementation
Aperio instructs client custodians to deliver proxy materials for accounts for which we have voting authority to our third-party proxy service provider(s) during the account inception process. During the period when a client’s custodian is setting up a connection with one of our proxy voting service providers, Aperio may receive paper ballots and will use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure those proxies are voted.
Once the set-up process is complete, proxies and ballots are received electronically by our third-party voting service provider(s) and voted according to the default or other client-selected proxy voting guidelines. For the Governance Guidelines (being voted during the transition period), which are not fully automated, Aperio manages the electronic voting, including some manual voting for proxies that fall outside the automated process.
B-13
7. Conflicts of Interest
Aperio’s Proxy Voting Committee monitors for, and seeks to resolve, potential material conflicts (“Material Conflicts”) in the course of proxy voting. Potential or actual conflicts of interest may arise in proxy voting due to business or personal relationships Aperio or BlackRock maintains with persons having an interest in the outcomes of certain votes. This can include Aperio, BlackRock and/or its affiliates, Aperio or BlackRock employees, or any service providers or their employees. For example, Aperio or its supervised persons1 may have a business or personal relationship with other proponents of proxy proposals, shareholder advocacy groups, participants in proxy contests, corporate directors, or candidates for directorships. If, at any time, Aperio and/or a third-party service provider becomes aware of any type of potential or actual conflict of interest relating to a particular proxy proposal, they will promptly report such conflict to the Proxy Voting Committee and Chief Compliance Officer or Head of Aperio Compliance. Conflicts of interest will be handled in various ways depending on their type and materiality.
Aperio’s general policy is to vote proxies presenting potential Material Conflicts as it would vote any other proxy, in a manner consistent with its Proxy Voting Policy and the default proxy voting guidelines or other guidelines selected by the client. The Proxy Voting Committee will regularly review all voting of proxies identified as presenting potential Material Conflicts at its regularly scheduled meetings to seek to ensure adherence to this standard.
Where a proxy proposal raises a Material Conflict between Aperio’s interests and a client’s interest, including a mutual fund client, Aperio will generally resolve such a conflict in the manner described below with regard to the affected resolutions:
● | Where the default or other client-selected proxy voting guidelines outline the voting position, as either “for” or “against” such proxy proposal, voting will generally be in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines. |
● | Where the default or other client-selected proxy voting guidelines outline the voting position to be determined on a “case-by-case” basis for such proxy proposal, or such proposal is not listed in the proxy voting guidelines, then one of the following methods will be selected, depending upon Aperio’s analysis of the facts and circumstances of each situation: |
● | Not voting or abstaining from voting the proxy, excluding clients who have chosen or are defaulted into the BAIS Guidelines. |
● | Excluding clients who have chosen or are defaulted into the BAIS Guidelines, voting the proxy pursuant to client direction to the extent that Aperio has discretion and ability to deviate from the proxy voting guidelines with respect to the proposal in question. In such instances, Aperio will endeavor to disclose the conflict to the relevant clients and obtain their consent to the proposed vote prior to voting the securities. |
1 | Supervised Persons includes any partner, officer, director (or other person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions), or employee of Aperio, or other person who provides investment advice on behalf of Aperio and is subject to the supervision and control of Aperio. |
B-14
● | The disclosure to the client will include sufficient detail regarding the matter to be voted on and the nature of the conflict so that the client will be able to make an informed decision regarding the vote. If a client does not respond to such a conflict disclosure request or denies the request, Aperio will refrain from voting the securities held in that client’s account. |
● | In certain limited circumstances and for clients who have chosen or are defaulted into the BAIS Guidelines, for proxies for which a Material Conflict of interest has been identified, an independent third-party vote service provider will provide a vote recommendation. |
Where BlackRock or a BlackRock affiliate is the subject of a shareholder proxy, it is anticipated that voting will generally be in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines applied to the account. However, the Proxy Voting Committee will be informed of situations where this arises.
8. Considerations in Voting
These procedures are designed to ensure that Aperio votes every eligible share where reasonable to do so. In certain circumstances, however, Aperio may be unable to vote or may determine not to vote a proxy on behalf of one or more clients. These circumstances may include, but are not limited to:
● | Where Aperio deems the cost of, or restrictions on, proxy voting would exceed any anticipated client benefit (e.g., certain foreign proxies, requirements to vote proxies in person, or where additional information is required to submit the vote that is not readily available to Aperio); |
● | For proxy ballots not received by Aperio on a timely basis, during the Proxy Setup Period or during breaks in connectivity between the client’s custodian and the third-party proxy voting service provider; |
● | Regulatory or contractual threshold constraints; and |
● | When voting a proxy would restrict the ability to trade the shares. |
Absent special circumstances, Aperio will exercise its proxy voting discretion in accordance with the default or other client-selected guidelines. However, it is intended that proxy voting guidelines will be applied with a measure of flexibility, excluding clients who have chosen or are defaulted into the BAIS Guidelines. Accordingly, except as otherwise provided in these policies and procedures, Aperio may vote a proxy contrary to the guidelines or not vote proxies, if it is determined that such action is in the best interests of the client, excluding clients who have chosen or are defaulted into the BAIS Guidelines.
9. General voting policy for ERISA accounts
Aperio will vote proxies for ERISA accounts in accordance with guidelines agreed to between the client and Aperio. Aperio will act in a prudent and diligent manner intended to enhance the economic value of the assets in the ERISA client’s account. Voting decisions for ERISA accounts must be based on the ultimate economic interest of the plan.
B-15
10. Maintaining records
Broadridge and/or ISS (or any other third-party service provider Aperio selects) will retain a record of every proxy statement they receive for which Aperio/they have the authority to vote on behalf of an Aperio client. Aperio will periodically archive proxy data from its proxy service provider(s) into its books and records. Either Aperio and/or the third-party service provider(s) will also retain:
1. | a record of the matter(s) to which the proxy statement related, including either the proxy statement itself or the EDGAR reference; |
2. | whether they voted “for,” “against,” “abstain,” or “withhold”; |
3. | a copy of any document they may have created that was material to making a decision how to vote proxies on behalf of a client or that memorializes the basis for that decision; |
4. | a copy of each written client request for information on how Aperio or a third-party service provider voted proxies on behalf of the client; and |
5. | a copy of any written response by Aperio to any (written or oral) client request for information on how Aperio voted proxies on behalf of the requesting client. |
All books and records required to be made and described above generally will be maintained and preserved in an easily accessible place for a period of not less than six years from the end of the fiscal year during which the last entry was made on such record, the first two years in an appropriate Aperio office or with Broadridge, ISS, or other appropriate third party.
11. Registered investment Company Client Records
Aperio will coordinate with all clients registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to provide information required to be filed by such funds on Form N-PX.
12. Corporate Actions for Accounts Retaining Proxy Voting Authority
Certain clients may elect to vote their own proxies. In these instances, the client handles aspects associated with proxy voting directly and independent of Aperio, while Aperio is delegated the responsibility with respect to securities held in the client’s account to make all elections concerning any mergers, acquisitions, tender offers, bankruptcy proceedings, or other corporate actions except class action lawsuits.
B-16
Proxy Voting Policy Adoption: August 6, 2003/Last Revision: February 24, 2025 (Last Reviewed: February 2025) |
GMO LLC and related entities2 (collectively, “GMO”)
|
I. Statement of Policy
Proxy voting is an important right of shareholders and reasonable care and diligence must be undertaken to seek to ensure that such rights are properly and timely exercised. Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC (“GMO”) manages a variety of products and GMO’s proxy voting authority may vary depending on the type of product or specific client preferences. GMO retains full proxy voting discretion for accounts comprised of comingled client assets. However, GMO’s proxy voting authority may vary for accounts that GMO manages on behalf of individual clients. These clients may retain full proxy voting authority for themselves, grant GMO full discretion to vote proxies on their behalf, or provide GMO with proxy voting authority along with specific instructions and/or custom proxy voting guidelines. Where GMO has been granted discretion to vote proxies on behalf of managed account clients this authority must be explicitly defined in the relevant Investment Management Agreement, or other document governing the relationship between GMO and the client.
In exercising its proxy voting authority, GMO is mindful of the fact that the value of proxy voting to a client’s investments may vary depending on the nature of an individual voting matter and the strategy in which a client is invested. Some GMO strategies follow a systematic, research-driven investment approach, applying quantitative tools to process fundamental information and manage risk. Some proxy votes may have heightened value for certain clients, such as votes on corporate events (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, dissolutions, conversions, or consolidations) for those clients invested in GMO strategies involving the purchase of securities around corporate events. These differences may result in varying levels of GMO engagement in proxy votes, but in all cases where GMO retains proxy voting authority, it will seek to vote proxies in the best interest of its clients and in accordance with this Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures (the “Policy”).
2 | Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC, GMO Australia Limited, and GMO Singapore Pte. Ltd. |
B-17
GMO’s Stewardship and Corporate Leadership Subcommittee, a sub-committee of the GMO ESG Oversight Committee, is responsible for the implementation of this Policy, including the oversight and use of third-party proxy advisers, the manner in which GMO votes its proxies, and fulfilling GMO’s obligation voting proxies in the best interest of its clients.
II. Use of Third-Party Proxy Advisors
GMO has retained an independent third-party Proxy Advisory firm for a variety of services including, but not limited to, receiving proxy ballots, proxy voting research and recommendations, and executing votes. GMO may also engage other Proxy Advisory firms as appropriate for proxy voting research and other services.
III. Considerations When Assessing or Considering a Proxy Advisory Firm
When considering the engagement of a new, or the performance and retention of an existing, Proxy Advisory firm to provide research, voting recommendations, or other proxy voting related services, GMO will, as part of its assessment, consider:
■ | The capacity and competency of the Proxy Advisory firm to adequately analyze the matters up for a vote; |
■ | The ability of the Proxy Advisory firm to provide information supporting its recommendations in a timely manner; |
■ | The ability of the Proxy Advisory firm to respond to ad hoc requests from GMO; |
■ | Whether the Proxy Advisory firm has an effective process for obtaining current and accurate information including from issuers and clients (e.g., engagement with issuers, efforts to correct deficiencies, disclosure about sources of information and methodologies, etc.); |
■ | How the Proxy Advisory firm incorporates appropriate input in formulating its methodologies and construction of issuer peer groups, including unique characteristics regarding an issuer; |
■ | Whether the Proxy Advisory firm has adequately disclosed its methodologies and application in formulating specific voting recommendations; |
■ | The nature of third-party information sources used as a basis for voting recommendations; |
■ | When and how the Proxy Advisory firm would expect to engage with issuers and other third parties; |
■ | Whether the Proxy Advisory firm has established adequate policies and procedures on how it identifies, discloses and addresses conflicts of interests that arise from providing proxy voting recommendations and related services, from activities other than providing proxy voting recommendations and services, and from Proxy Advisory firm affiliations; |
■ | Whether the Proxy Advisory firm has established adequate diversity and inclusion practices; |
■ | Information regarding any errors, deficiencies, or weaknesses that may materially affect the Proxy Advisory firm’s research or ultimate recommendation; |
■ | Whether the Proxy Advisory firm appropriately and regularly updates methodologies, guidelines, and recommendations, including in response to feedback from issuers and their shareholders; |
B-18
■ | Whether the Proxy Advisory firm adequately discloses any material business changes taking into account any potential conflicts of interests that may arise from such changes. |
GMO also undertakes periodic sampling of proxy votes as part of its assessment of a Proxy Advisory firm and in order to reasonably determine that proxy votes are being cast on behalf of its clients consistent with this Policy.
IV. Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Proxy Advisor
GMO requires any Proxy Advisory firm it engages with to identify and provide information regarding any material business changes or conflicts of interest on an ongoing basis. Where a conflict of interest may exist, GMO requires information on how said conflict is being addressed. If GMO determines that a material conflict of interest exists and is not sufficiently mitigated, GMO’s Stewardship and Corporate Leadership Subcommittee will determine whether the conflict has an impact on the Proxy Advisory firm’s voting recommendations, research, or other services and determine if any action should be taken.
V. Voting Procedures and Approach
In relation to stocks held in GMO funds and accounts where GMO has proxy voting discretion, GMO will, as a general rule, seek to vote in accordance with this Policy and the applicable guidelines GMO has developed to govern voting recommendations from its Proxy Advisory firm (“GMO Voting Guidelines”). In instances where a separate account client has provided GMO with specific instructions and/or custom proxy voting guidelines, GMO will seek to vote proxies in line with such instructions or custom guidelines.
GMO may refrain from voting in certain situations unless otherwise agreed to with a client. These situations include, but are not limited to, when:
1. | The cost of voting a proxy outweighs the benefit of voting; |
2. | GMO does not have enough time to process and submit a vote due to the timing of proxy information transfer or other related logistical or administrative issues; |
3. | GMO has an outstanding sell order or intends to sell the applicable security prior to the voting date; |
4. | There are restrictions on trading resulting from the exercise of a proxy; |
5. | Voting would cause an undue burden to GMO (e.g., votes occurring in jurisdictions with beneficial ownership disclosure and/or Power of Attorney requirements); or |
B-19
6. | GMO has agreed with the client in advance of the vote not to vote in certain situations or on specific issues. |
GMO generally does not notify clients of non-voted proxy ballots.
Some of GMO’s strategies primarily focus on portfolio management and research related to macro trading strategies which are implemented through the use of derivatives. These strategies typically do not hold equity securities with voting rights.
VI. Voting Guidelines
GMO seeks to vote proxies in a manner that encourages and rewards behavior that supports the creation of sustainable long-term growth, and in a way consistent with the investment mandate of the assets we manage for our clients. Accordingly, GMO’s Voting Guidelines aim to promote sustainable best practices in portfolio companies, which includes advocating for environmental protection, human rights, fair labor, and anti-discrimination practices. When evaluating and adopting these guidelines and to encourage best sustainability practices, we take into account generally accepted frameworks such as those defined by the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment and United Nations Global Compact.
VII. Issuer Specific Ballot Evaluations
GMO may review individual ballots (for example, in relation to specific corporate events such as mergers and acquisitions) using a more detailed analysis than is generally applied through the GMO Voting Guidelines. This analysis may, but does not always, result in deviation from the voting recommendation that would result from the GMO Voting Guidelines assigned to a given GMO fund or managed account. When determining whether to conduct an issuer-specific analysis, GMO will consider the potential effect of the vote on the value of the investment. To the extent that issuer-specific analysis results in a voting recommendation that deviates from a recommendation produced by the GMO Voting Guidelines, GMO will be required to vote proxies in a way that, in GMO’s reasonable judgment, is in the best interest of GMO’s clients.
VIII. Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Advisor
GMO mitigates potential conflicts of interest by generally voting in accordance with the GMO Voting Guidelines and/or specific voting guidelines provided by clients. However, from time to time, GMO may determine to vote contrary to GMO Voting Guidelines with respect to GMO funds or accounts for which GMO has voting discretion, which itself could give rise to potential conflicts of interest.
B-20
In addition, if GMO is aware that one of the following conditions exists with respect to a proxy, GMO shall consider such event a potential material conflict of interest:
1. | GMO has a material business relationship or potential relationship with the issuer; |
2. | GMO has a material business relationship with the proponent of the proxy proposal; or |
3. | GMO members, employees or consultants have a personal or other material business relationship with the participants in the proxy contest, such as corporate directors or director candidates. |
In the event of a potential material conflict of interest, GMO will (i) vote such proxy according to the GMO Voting Guidelines; (ii) seek instructions from the client or request that the client votes such proxy, or (iii) abstain. All such instances shall be reported to GMO’s Compliance Department at least quarterly.
IX. Ballot Materials and Processing
The Proxy Advisory firm is responsible for coordinating with GMO’s clients’ custodians to seek to ensure that proxy materials received by custodians relating to a client’s securities are processed in a timely fashion. Proxies relating to securities held in client accounts will typically be sent directly to the Proxy Advisory firm. In the event that proxy materials are sent to GMO directly instead of the Proxy Advisory firm, GMO will use reasonable efforts to coordinate with the Proxy Advisory firm for processing.
X. Disclosure
Upon request, GMO will provide clients with a copy of this Policy and how the relevant client’s proxies have been voted. In relation to the latter, GMO will prepare a written response that lists, with respect to each voted proxy:
1. | The name of the issuer; |
2. | The proposal voted upon; and |
3. | The election made for the proposal. |
XI. GMO Mutual Funds
GMO’s responsibility and authority to vote proxies on behalf of its clients for shares of GMO Trust, a family of registered mutual funds for which GMO serves as the investment adviser, may give rise to conflicts of interest. Accordingly, GMO will (i) vote such proxies in the best interests of its clients with respect to routine matters, including proxies relating to the election of Trustees; and (ii) with respect to matters where a conflict of interest exists between GMO and GMO Trust, such as proxies relating to a new or amended investment management contract between GMO Trust and GMO, or a re-organization of a series of GMO Trust, GMO will either (a) vote such proxies in the same proportion as the votes cast with respect to that proxy, (b) seek instructions from its clients and vote on accordance with those instructions, or (c) take such other action as GMO deems appropriate in consultation with the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer.
B-21
On an annual basis, GMO will provide, or cause the Proxy Advisory firm to provide, to the GMO Trust administrator or other designee on a timely basis, any and all reports and information necessary to prepare and file Form N-PX, which is required by Rule 30b1-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
XII. Proxy Recordkeeping
GMO and its Proxy Advisory firm (where applicable) will maintain records with respect to this Policy for a period of no less than five (5) years as required by SEC Rule 204-2 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, including the following:
1. | A copy of the Policy, and any amendments thereto; |
2. | A copy of any document that was material to making a decision how to vote proxies, or that memorializes that decision; and |
3. | A record of each vote cast by GMO or the Proxy Advisory firm on behalf of GMO clients. |
XIII. Review of Policy and Procedures
As a general principle, the Stewardship and Corporate Leadership Subcommittee, with the involvement from the Compliance Department, reviews, on an annual basis, the adequacy of this Policy to reasonably ensure it has been implemented effectively, including whether it continues to be reasonably designed to ensure that GMO’s approach to voting proxies is in the best interests of its clients.
B-22
MacKay Shields
Proxy
Voting Policies and Procedures
February 2025
1. | Introduction |
MacKay Shields1 (“MacKay” or the “Firm”) has adopted these “Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures” (the “Policy”) to ensure the Firm’s compliance with Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”) and other applicable fiduciary obligations. The Policy applies to proxies relating to securities held by clients of MacKay Shields who have delegated the responsibility of voting proxies to the Firm. The Policy is designed to assist Firm employees in meeting their specific responsibilities in this area and to reasonably ensure that proxies are voted in the best interests of the Firm’s clients.
2. | Statement of Policy |
2.1 It is the policy of MacKay Shields that where the Firm has voting authority, all proxies are to be voted in the best interest of the client without regard to the interests of MacKay Shields or other related parties. Specifically, MacKay Shields shall not subordinate the interests of clients to unrelated objectives, including MacKay Shields’ interests. MacKay Shields shall act with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims. For purposes of the Policy, the “best interests of clients” shall mean, unless otherwise specified by the client, the clients’ best economic interests over the long term as determined by MacKay Shields – that is, the common interest that all MacKay Shields clients share in seeing the value of a common investment increase over time. It is further the policy of the Firm that complete and accurate disclosure concerning its proxy voting policies and procedures and proxy voting records as required by the Advisers Act, be made available to its clients.
2.2 When proxies with respect to securities held by clients of MacKay Shields have not been received by MacKay Shields or its proxy voting service provider, MacKay Shields will make reasonable efforts to obtain missing proxies. MacKay Shields is not responsible for voting proxies it or its proxy voting service provider does not receive.
2.3 MacKay Shields may choose not to vote proxies when it believes that it is appropriate. This may occur, without limitation, under the following circumstances:
● | If the effect on the client’s economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant; |
● | If the cost of voting the proxy outweighs the possible benefit to the client; or |
● | If a jurisdiction imposes share blocking restrictions which prevent the Firm from trading shares. |
1 | For purposes of this Policy, MacKay Shields refers to MacKay Shields LLC and NYL Investments UK LLP. |
B-23
3. | Use of Third Party Proxy Voting Service Provider |
To discharge its responsibility, MacKay Shields has examined third-party services that assist in the researching and voting of proxies and the development of voting guidelines. After such review, the Firm has selected Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., (“ISS”), to research voting proposals, analyze the financial implications of voting proposals and vote proxies. MacKay Shields utilizes the research and analytical services, operational implementation, administration, record-keeping and reporting services provided by ISS.
4. | Proxy Voting Guidelines |
4.1 To the extent that a client has authorized Mackay Shields to vote proxies on its behalf, and except as set forth Sections 6 & 7 of this Policy or at otherwise directed by a client in writing, MacKay has determined to adopt the following proxy voting guidelines:
4.1.a Proxies for non-union clients will generally be voted in accordance with the voting recommendations contained in the applicable ISS non-union domestic or global proxy voting guidelines, as in effect from time to time (“Non-Union Guidelines”). Refer to Exhibit A for the current U.S. Summary Proxy Voting Guidelines.
4.1.b Proxies for union or Taft-Hartley clients will generally be voted in accordance with the voting recommendations contained in the applicable ISS Taft- Hartley domestic or international proxy voting guidelines, as in effect from time to time (“Union Guidelines”). A summary of the current Taft-Hartley U.S. Voting Guidelines and Taft-Hartley International Voting Guidelines are attached as Exhibit B.
4.1.c Notwithstanding Section 4.1.a of this Policy, proxies for non-union clients whose investment strategy directs MacKay Shields to invest primarily in assets that satisfy Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) criteria, as determined by MacKay Shields, in its discretion, will be voted in accordance with the voting recommendations contained in the applicable ISS Sustainability U.S. or International proxy voting guidelines, as in effect from time to time (“Sustainability Guidelines”). Refer to Exhibit C for the current U.S. and International Sustainability Proxy Voting Guidelines.
4.2 For purposes of the Policy, the Non-Union Guidelines, Union Guidelines, and Sustainability Guidelines are collectively referred to as the “Standard Guidelines.”
4.3 A client may choose to use proxy voting guidelines different from the Standard Guidelines (“Custom Guidelines”). Any Custom Guidelines must be furnished by the client to MacKay Shields in writing and MacKay Shields will general vote proxies for any such client in accordance with the applicable Custom Guidelines.
4.4 In the event the Standard Guidelines or any client’s Custom Guidelines do not address how a proxy should be voted or state that the vote is to be determined on a “case-by-case” basis, the proxy will be voted in accordance with ISS recommendations, subject to Section 6. In the event that ISS has not made a recommendation, MacKay Shields will follow the procedure set forth in Section 7.
B-24
4.5 For clients using the Standard Guidelines, the Firm will instruct ISS to cast votes in accordance with the Standard Guidelines. For clients using Custom Guidelines, the Firm will provide ISS with a copy of such Custom Guidelines and will instruct ISS to cast votes in accordance with such Custom Guidelines. ISS will cast votes in accordance with the Standard Guidelines or Custom Guidelines, as the case may be, unless instructed otherwise by MacKay Shields as set forth in Sections 6 and 7. Upon receipt of a specific request from a client pursuant to Section 4.6, the Firm will instruct ISS to cast such client’s proxy in accordance with such request.
4.6 Notwithstanding the foregoing, MacKay Shields will vote a proxy with respect to a particular security held by a client in accordance with such client’s specific request even if it is in a manner inconsistent with the Standard Guidelines or the client’s Custom Guidelines, as the case may be. Any such specific requests must be furnished to MacKay Shields by the client in writing and must be received by MacKay on a timely basis for instructing ISS how to cast the vote.
4.7 In an effort to avoid possible conflicts of interest, MacKay Shields has determined to generally vote proxies based on the Standard Guidelines or a client’s Custom Guidelines, as the case may be. For the avoidance of doubt, however, it is recognized that the Firm’s portfolio management teams have the ultimate responsibility determining how to vote proxies in the best interest of a client voting.
5. | Client Account Set-up and Review |
5.1 Initially, MacKay Shields must verify whether the client has duly authorized MacKay Shields to vote proxies on its behalf, or if the client has retained the responsibility of voting proxies. The Marketing and Client Services departments, in conjunction with the Legal and/or Compliance Department, will have primary responsibility for making that determination. MacKay’s Compliance Department will be responsible for ensuring that a record of each client’s proxy voting status and, to the extent applicable, the type of proxy voting guidelines in maintained. In its sole discretion, the Firm may decline to accept authority to vote a client’s proxies. Any such refusal shall be in writing.
5.2 In most cases, the delegation of voting authority to MacKay Shields, and the Firm’s use of a third-party proxy voting service provider shall be memorialized in the client’s investment management agreement.
5.3 MacKay Shields shall notify ISS of new client accounts using such form as ISS shall specify from time to time. Designated personnel within the Firm will be responsible for ensuring that each new client’s account for which the Firm has proxy voting authority is established on the appropriate systems and that each such account is properly coded for voting under the appropriate Non-Union Guidelines, Union Guidelines or Custom Guidelines, as the case may be.
B-25
6. | Overriding Guidelines |
A portfolio manager may propose that a particular proxy vote be cast in a manner different from the Standard Guidelines or an ISS voting recommendation, or may propose an abstention from voting, if they believe that to do so, based on all facts and circumstances, is in the best interest of the Firm’s clients as a whole. Any portfolio manager who proposes to override the Standard Guidelines or an ISS voting recommendation on a particular vote or to abstain from voting must complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form, which is set forth in Schedule D.
7. | Referral of Voting Decision by ISS to MacKay Shields |
7.1 In the event that the Standard Guidelines or a client’s Custom Guidelines do not address how a proxy should be voted on a specific proposal for an issuer and ISS has not made a recommendation as to how such proxy should be voted, ISS will so advise MacKay Shields. In that event, the Legal and/or Compliance Departments will request that the appropriate portfolio manager makes a voting recommendation and complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form.
7.2 In the event that the Standard Guidelines or a client’s Custom Guidelines require a “case-by-case” determination on a particular proxy vote and ISS has not made a recommendation as to how such proxy should be voted, ISS will so advise MacKay Shields. In that event, the Legal and/or Compliance Departments will request that the appropriate portfolio manager make a voting recommendation and complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form.
7.3 In the event that ISS determines that a conflict of interest exists as a result of which ISS is precluded from making a recommendation as to how a proxy should be voted on a specific proposal for an issuer, ISS will so advise MacKay Shields. In that event, the Legal and/or Compliance Departments will request that the appropriate portfolio manager make a voting recommendation and complete a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form.
8. | Conflicts of Interest |
8.1 The Firm’s portfolio managers may make proxy voting decisions in connection with (i) overriding the Standard Guidelines or an ISS voting recommendation pursuant to Section 6, or (ii) deciding on a vote pursuant to Section 7. In such event, the portfolio managers have an affirmative duty to disclose to the Legal and/or Compliance Departments any potential conflict of interest known to them that exists between the Firm and the client on whose behalf the proxy is to be voted (“Conflict”).
8.2. By way of example, Conflicts may exist in situations where the Firm is called to vote on a proxy involving an issuer or proponent of a proxy proposal regarding the issuer where MacKay Shields or an affiliated person of the Firm also:
● | Manages the issuer’s or proponent’s pension plan; |
● | Administers the issuer’s or proponent’s employee benefit plan; |
B-26
● | Provided brokerage, underwriting, insurance or banking services to the issuer or proponent; or |
● | Manages money for an employee group. |
Additional Conflicts may exist, among others, if an executive of the Firm or its control affiliates is a close relative of, or has a personal or business relationship with:
● | An executive of the issuer or proponent; |
● | A director of the issuer or proponent; |
● | A person who is a candidate to be a director of the issuer; |
● | A participant in the proxy contest; or |
● | A proponent of a proxy proposal. |
8.3 Whether a relationship creates a Conflict will depend on the facts and circumstances. Even if these parties do not attempt to influence the Firm with respect to voting, the value of the relationship to MacKay Shields or an affiliate can create a Conflict.
8.4 After a Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form is completed pursuant to Sections 6 or 7, such Form, which elicits information as to whether a potential Conflict exists, must be submitted to the Legal and/or Compliance Departments for review. If the Firm’s General Counsel (“GC”), Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) or their designee determines that there is no potential Conflict, the GC, CCO or their designee, may instruct ISS to vote the proxy issue as set forth in the completed Form.
8.5 If the GC, CCO or their designee determines that there exists or may exist a Conflict, he or she will refer the issue to the Compliance Committee for consideration by convening (in person or via telephone) an emergency meeting of the Compliance Committee. For purposes of this Policy, a majority vote of those members present shall resolve any Conflict. The Compliance Committee will consider the facts and circumstances of the pending proxy vote and the potential or actual Conflict and make a determination as to how to vote the proxy – i.e., whether to permit or deny the recommendation of the portfolio manager, or whether to take other action, such as delegating the proxy vote to an independent third party or obtaining voting instructions from clients.
8.6 In considering the proxy vote and potential Conflict, the Compliance Committee may review the following factors, including but not limited to:
● | The percentage of outstanding securities of the issuer held on behalf of clients by the Firm. |
● | The nature of the relationship of the issuer or proponent with the Firm, its affiliates or its executive officers. |
● | Whether there has been any attempt to directly or indirectly influence the portfolio manager’s decision. |
● | Whether the direction (for or against) of the proposed vote would appear to benefit the Firm or a related party. |
● | Whether an objective decision to vote in a certain way will still create a strong appearance of a Conflict. |
B-27
MacKay Shields may not abstain from voting any such proxy for the purpose of avoiding Conflict.
9. | Securities Lending |
If MacKay Shields portfolio managers or their designees become aware of an upcoming shareholder meeting where there is an important vote to be taken, or become aware of a request for consent of security holders on a material matter affecting the investment, MacKay Shields will consider whether to request that clients call back securities loans, if applicable. In determining whether to request that clients call back securities loans, the relevant portfolio manager(s) shall consider whether the benefit to the client in voting the matter or giving or withholding consent outweighs the benefit to the client in keeping the security on loan. There may be instances when MacKay Shields may not be aware of the upcoming shareholder meeting or request for consent with sufficient time in advance to make such a request, or when MacKay Shields’ request that a client call back a securities loan in sufficient time to vote or give or withhold consent may not be successful.
10. | Reporting |
Upon request, MacKay Shields shall report annually (or more frequently if specifically requested) to its clients on proxy votes cast on their behalf. MacKay Shields will provide any client who makes a written or verbal request with a copy of a report disclosing how MacKay Shields voted securities held in that client’s portfolio. The report will generally contain the following information:
● | The name of the issuer of the security; |
● | The security’s exchange ticker symbol; |
● | The security’s CUSIP number; |
● | The shareholder meeting date; |
● | A brief identification of the matter voted on; |
● | Whether the matter was proposed by the issuer or by a security holder; |
● | Whether MacKay Shields cast its vote on the matter on behalf of the client; |
● | How MacKay Shields voted on behalf of the client; and |
● | Whether MacKay Shields voted for or against management on behalf of the client. |
11. | Record-Keeping |
All reports and records shall be kept in accordance with these Procedures, the Firm’s Maintenance and Retention of Books and Records Policy, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and other applicable regulations.
12. | Review of Voting and Guidelines |
As part of its periodic reviews, MacKay Shields’ Compliance Department will conduct an annual review of the prior year’s proxy voting as well as the guidelines established for proxy voting. Documentation shall be maintained of this review and a report setting forth the results of the review will be presented annually to the Compliance Committee. In addition, MacKay Shields’ Compliance Department maintains a list of non-voting accounts.
B-28
13. | How to Request Information On How the Firm Voted Proxies |
Clients may, at anytime, request and receive information from MacKay Shields as to how the Firm voted proxies for securities held in their account. Any such proxy information request should be in writing to:
MacKay Shields LLC
1345 Avenue of the Americas New
York, NY 10105
43rd Floor
Attention: Head of Client Services
Exhibits:
Exhibit A - | U.S. Summary Proxy Voting Guidelines (Standard Guidelines for non- union clients). |
Exhibit B (Part I and II) - U.S. Taft-Hartley Proxy Voting Guidelines and International Taft-Hartley Proxy Voting Guidelines (Standard Guidelines for union clients (Taft-Hartley) (US and International))
Exhibit C (Part I and II) - U.S. Sustainability Proxy Voting Guidelines and International Sustainability Proxy Voting Guidelines (Standard Guidelines for ESG investment objective mandates)
Schedule D- | Proxy Vote Override/Decision Form |
Access to the ISS Voting Guidelines mentioned above and other ISS Voting Guidelines are available at https://www.issgovernance.com/policy-gateway/voting-policies/
B-29
Nuveen Proxy Voting Policy
Policy Purpose and Statement
Proxy voting is the primary means by which shareholders may influence a publicly traded company's governance and operations and thus create the potential for value and positive long-term investment performance. When an SEC registered investment adviser has proxy voting authority, the adviser has a fiduciary duty to vote proxies in the best interests of its clients and must not subrogate its clients’ interests to its own. In their capacity as fiduciaries and investment advisers, Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“NAM”), Teachers Advisors, LLC (“TAL”) and TIAA-CREF Investment Management, LLC (“TCIM”), (each an “Adviser” and collectively, the “Advisers”), vote proxies for the Portfolio Companies held by their respective clients, including investment companies and other pooled investment vehicles, institutional and retail separate accounts, and other clients as applicable. The Advisers have adopted this Policy, the Nuveen Proxy Voting Guidelines, and the Nuveen Proxy Voting Conflicts of Interest Policy for voting the proxies of the Portfolio Companies they manage. The Advisers leverage the expertise and services of an internal group referred to as the Responsible Investing Team (RI Team) to administer the Advisers’ proxy voting. The RI Team adheres to the Advisers’ Proxy Voting Guidelines which are reasonably designed to ensure that the Advisers vote client securities in the best interests of the Advisers’ clients.
Applicability
This Policy applies to Nuveen employees acting on behalf of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, Teachers Advisors, LLC, and TIAA-CREF
Investment Management, LLC
Policy Statement
Proxy voting is a key component of a Portfolio Company’s corporate governance program and is the primary method for exercising shareholder rights and influencing the Portfolio Company’s behavior. Nuveen makes informed voting decisions in compliance with Rule 206(4)-6 (the “Rule”) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”) and applicable laws and regulations, (e.g., the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, “ERISA”).
Enforcement
As provided in the TIAA Code of Business Conduct, all employees are expected to comply with applicable laws and regulations, as well as the relevant policies, procedures and compliance manuals that apply to Nuveen’s business activities. Violation of this Policy may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
Terms and Definitions
Advisory Personnel includes the Adviser’s portfolio managers and/or research analysts.
Proxy Voting Guidelines (the ‘’Guidelines’’) are a set of pre-determined principles setting forth the manner in which the Advisers intend to vote on specific voting categories, and serve to assist clients, Portfolio Companies, and other interested parties in understanding how the Advisers intend to vote on proxy-related matters. The Guidelines are not exhaustive and do not necessarily dictate how the Advisers will ultimately vote with respect to any proposal or resolution.
Portfolio Company includes any publicly traded company held in an account that is managed by an Adviser.
B-30
Policy Requirements
Investment advisers, in accordance with the Rule, are required to (i) adopt and implement written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of clients, and address resolution of material conflicts that may arise, (ii) describe their proxy voting procedures to their clients and provide copies on request, and (iii) disclose to clients how they may obtain information on how the Advisers voted their proxies.
The Nuveen Proxy Voting Committee (the “Committee”), the Advisers, the RI Team and Nuveen Compliance are subject to the respective requirements outlined below under Roles and Responsibilities.
Although it is the general policy to vote all applicable proxies received in a timely fashion with respect to securities selected by an Adviser for current clients, the Adviser may refrain from voting in certain circumstances where such voting would be disadvantageous, materially burdensome or impractical, or otherwise inconsistent with the overall best interest of clients.
Roles and Responsibilities
Nuveen Proxy Voting Committee
The purpose of the Committee is to establish a governance framework to oversee the proxy voting activities of the Advisers in accordance with the Policy. The Committee has delegated responsibility for the implementation and ongoing administration of the Policy to the RI Team, subject to the Committee’s ultimate oversight and responsibility as outlined in the Committee’s Proxy Voting Charter.
Advisers
1. | Advisory Personnel maintain the ultimate decision-making authority with respect to how proxies will be voted, unless otherwise instructed by a client, and may determine to vote contrary to the Guidelines and/or a vote recommendation of the RI Team if such Advisory Personnel determines it is in the best interest of the Adviser’s clients to do so. The rationale for all such contrary vote determinations will be documented and maintained. |
2. | When voting proxies for different groups of client accounts, Advisory Personnel may vote proxies held by the respective client accounts differently depending on the facts and circumstances specific to such client accounts. The rationale for all such vote determinations will be documented and maintained. |
3. | Advisory Personnel must comply with the Nuveen Proxy Voting Conflicts of Interest Policy with respect to potential material conflicts of interest. |
Responsible Investing Team
1. | Performs day-to-day administration of the Advisers’ proxy voting processes. |
2. | Seeks to vote proxies in adherence to the Guidelines, which have been constructed in a manner intended to align with the best interests of clients. In applying the Guidelines, the RI Team, on behalf of the Advisers, takes into account several factors, including, but not limited to: |
● | Input from Advisory Personnel |
● | Third party research |
● | Specific Portfolio Company context, including environmental, social and governance practices, and financial performance. |
3. | Delivers copies of the Advisers’ Policy to clients and prospective clients upon request in a timely manner, as appropriate. |
4. | Assists with the disclosure of proxy votes as applicable on corporate websites and elsewhere as required by applicable regulations. |
B-31
5. | Prepares reports of proxies voted on behalf of the Advisers’ investment company clients to their Boards or committees thereof, as applicable. |
6. | Performs an annual vote reconciliation for review by the Committee. |
7. | Arranges the annual service provider due diligence, including a review of the service provider’s potential conflicts of interests, and presents the results to the Committee. |
8. | Facilitates quarterly Committee meetings, including agenda and meeting minute preparation. |
9. | Complies with the Nuveen Proxy Voting Conflicts of Interest Policy with respect to potential material conflicts of interest. |
10. | Creates and retains certain records in accordance with Nuveen’s Record Management program. |
11. | Oversees the proxy voting service provider in making and retaining certain records as required under applicable regulation. |
12. | Assesses, in cooperation with Advisory Personnel, whether securities on loan should be recalled in order to vote their proxies. |
Nuveen Compliance
1. | Ensures proper disclosure of Advisers’ Policy to clients as required by regulation or otherwise. |
2. | Ensures proper disclosure to clients of how they may obtain information on how the Advisers voted their proxies. |
3. | Assists the RI Team with arranging the annual service provider due diligence and presenting the results to the Committee. |
4. | Monitors for compliance with this Policy and retains records relating to its monitoring activities pursuant to Nuveen’s Records Management program. |
Governance
Review and Approval
This Policy will be reviewed at least annually and will be updated sooner if substantive changes are necessary. The Policy Leader, the Committee and the NEFI Compliance Committee are responsible for the review and approval of this Policy.
Implementation
Nuveen has established the Committee to provide centralized management and oversight of the proxy voting process administered by the RI Team for the Advisers in accordance with its Proxy Voting Committee Charter and this Policy.
Exceptions
Any request for a proposed exception or variation to this Policy will be submitted to the Committee for approval and reported to the appropriate governance committee(s), where appropriate.
Related Documents
● | Nuveen Proxy Voting Committee Charter |
● | Nuveen Proxy Voting Guidelines |
● | Nuveen Proxy Voting Conflicts of Interest Policy and Procedures |
● | Nuveen Policy Statement on Responsible Investing |
Policy Adoption Date | February 3, 2020 |
Current Policy Effective Date | October 1, 2022 |
Current Policy Approval Date | August 31, 2022 |
Policy Owner | Nuveen Proxy Voting Committee |
Policy Leader | Managing Director, Nuveen Compliance |
Policy Portal Administration | Leader: Managing
Director, Nuveen Compliance Owner: Managing Director, Head of Affiliate Compliance |
Criticality/Tier | Moderate |
B-32
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT cOMPANY
Wellington Management 2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines |
![]() |
wellington’s philosophy
Wellington Management is a long-term steward of our clients’ assets and aims to vote proxies for which we have voting authority in the best financial interest of clients.
These guidelines are based on Wellington Management’s fiduciary obligation to act in the best financial interest of its clients as shareholders and while written to apply globally, we consider jurisdictional differences to make informed decisions.
It should be noted that the following are guidelines, not rigid rules, and Wellington Management reserves the right in all cases to deviate from the general direction set out below where doing so is in the best interest of its clients.
our approach to stewardship
The goal of our stewardship activities is to support decisions that we believe will maximize investment returns for our clients.
The mechanisms we use to implement our stewardship activities vary by asset class. Engagement applies to all our investments across equity and credit, in both private and public markets. Proxy voting applies mostly to public equities.
Stewardship extends to any area that may affect the long-term sustainable financial return of an investment[.] Stewardship can be accomplished through research and constructive dialogue with company management and boards, by monitoring company behavior through informed active ownership, and by emphasizing management accountability for important issues via our proxy votes, which have long been part of Wellington’s investment ethos. Please refer to our Engagement Policy for more information on how engagement is conducted at Wellington.
our approach to voting
We vote proxies in what we consider to be the best financial interests of our clients. Our approach to voting is investment-led and serves as an influential component of our engagement and escalation strategy. The Investment Stewardship Committee, a cross-functional group of experienced professionals, oversees Wellington Management’s stewardship activities with regards to proxy voting and engagement practices.
Generally, issues which can be addressed by the proxy voting guidance below are voted by means of standing instructions communicated to our primary voting agent. Some votes warrant analysis of specific facts and circumstances and therefore are reviewed individually. We examine such proxy proposals on their merits and take voting action in a manner that best serves the financial interests of our clients. While manual votes are often resolved by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) analysts and grounded in our sector and company research, each portfolio manager is empowered to make a final decision for their relevant client portfolio(s), absent a material conflict of interest. Proactive portfolio manager input is sought under certain circumstances, which may include consideration of position size and proposal subject matter and nature. Where portfolio manager input is proactively sought, deliberation across the firm may occur. This collaboration does not prioritize consensus across the firm above all other interests but rather seeks to inform portfolio managers’ decisions by allowing them to consider multiple perspectives. Consistent with our community-of-boutiques model, portfolio managers may occasionally arrive at different voting conclusions for their clients, resulting in different decisions for the same vote. Robust voting procedures and the deliberation that occurs before a vote decision are aligned with our role as active owners and fiduciaries for our clients.
B-33
We generally support shareholder proposals if we determine that their adoption would promote long-term shareholder value. In making this determination, we consider numerous factors, including but not limited to the anticipated benefits of the proposal to the company; whether the proposal addresses the general interests of the company’s shareholders and not just those of the shareholder proponents; whether the company is currently addressing the issue motivating the proposal or has engaged with the shareholder proponents; whether the company can implement the proposal effectively; and whether the proposal’s adoption would impose material costs on the company or result in unintended consequences.
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
In addition, because proxy voting provides only limited means (i.e., voting “for” or “against”) to express our views on a particular issue, we may support shareholder proposals in cases where we do not support every recommended action or where the proposal is accompanied by a supporting statement that we do not support so long as we are directionally aligned with the issue motivating the proposal. In these cases, we aim to engage directly with the company to clarify the nuanced view our vote represents.
Please refer to our Global Proxy Policy and Procedures for further background on the process and governance of our voting approach.
Detailed below are the principles which we consider when deciding how to vote.
Voting Guidelines
Board composition and role of directors
Effective boards should act in shareholders’ best economic interests and possess the relevant skills to implement the company’s strategy.
We consider shareholders’ ability to elect directors annually an important right and, accordingly, generally support proposals to enable annual director elections and declassify boards.
We may withhold votes from directors for being unresponsive to shareholders or for failing to make progress on issues material to maximizing investment returns. We may also withhold votes from directors who fail to implement shareholder proposals that if adopted would promote shareholder value and Thave received majority support or have implemented poison pills without shareholder approval.
Time commitments
We expect directors to have the time and energy to fully commit to their board-related responsibilities and not be over-stretched with an excessive number of external directorships. We may vote against directors when serving on five or more public company boards; and public company executives when serving on three or more public company boards, including their own.
B-34
We consider the roles of board chair and chair of the audit committee as equivalent to an additional board seat when evaluating the overboarding matrix for non-executives. We may take into consideration that certain directorships, such as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) and investment companies, are usually less demanding.
Directors should also attend at least 75% of scheduled board meetings and we may vote against their re-election unless they disclose a valid reason for failure to do so.
Succession planning and board refreshment
We do not have specific voting policies relating to director age or tenure. We prefer to take a holistic view, evaluating whether the company is balancing the perspectives of new directors with the institutional knowledge of longer-serving board members. Succession planning is a key topic during many of our board engagements.
We expect companies to refresh their board membership every five years and may vote against the chair of the nominating committee for failure to implement. We believe a degree of director turnover allows companies to strengthen board diversity and add new skillsets to the board to enhance their oversight and adapt to evolving strategies.
Boards should offer transparency around their process to evaluate director performance and independence, conducting a rigorous regular evaluation of the board, key committees as well as individual directors, which is responsive to shareholder input. We believe externally facilitated board evaluations may contribute to companies retaining an appropriate mix of skills, experience and diversity on their boards over time.
As of December 2022
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
In certain markets companies are governed by multi-tiered boards, with each tier having different responsibilities. We hold supervisory board members to similar standards, subject to prevailing local governance best practices.
Board independence
In our view, boards perform best when composed of an appropriate combination of executive and non-executive (in particular independent non-executive) directors to challenge and counsel management.
To determine appropriate minimum levels of board independence, we look to prevailing market best practices; two-thirds in the US, for example, and majority in the UK and France. In Japan, we will consider voting against the board chair (or the most senior executive on the ballot) in cases where the board is less than one-third independent.
In addition to the overall independence at the board level, we also consider the independence of audit, compensation, and nominating committees. Where independence falls short of our expectations, we may withhold approval for non-independent directors or those responsible for the board composition. We typically vote in support of shareholder proposals calling for improved independence.
We believe that having an independent chair is the preferred structure for board leadership. Having an independent chair avoids the inherent conflict of self-oversight and helps ensure robust debate and diversity of thought in the boardroom. We will generally support proposals to separate the chair and CEO or establish a lead director but may support the involvement of an outgoing CEO as executive chair for a limited period to ensure a smooth transition to new management.
B-35
Board diversity
We believe boards which reflect a wide range of perspectives are best positioned to create shareholder value. Appointing boards that thoughtfully debate company strategy and direction is not possible unless boards elect highly qualified and diverse directors. By setting a leadership example, boardrooms with a wide range of experiences, expertise, and perspectives encourage an organizational culture that promotes diverse thinkers, enabling better strategic decisions and the navigation of increasingly complex issues facing companies today.
We think it is not in shareholders’ best interests for the full board to be comprised of directors who all share the same background, experience, and personal characteristics (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity, and age) . We expect our portfolio companies to be thoughtful and intentional in considering the widest possible pool of skilled candidates who bring diverse perspectives into the boardroom. We encourage companies to disclose the composition and qualifications of their board and to communicate their ambitions and strategies for creating and fostering a diverse board.
We reserve the right to vote against the re-election of the Nominating/Governance Committee Chair when the board is not meeting local market standards from a diversity perspective or when the gender-diverse representation is below 20% at companies in major indices. Outside of these major indices and absent a market-defined standard, we may vote against the reelection of the Nominating/Governance Committee Chair where no gender-diverse directors are represented on a board.
We reserve the right to vote against the reelection of the Nominating/Governance Committee Chair at US large cap and FTSE 100 companies that failed to appoint at least one director from a minority ethnic group and fail to provide clear and compelling reason for being unable to do so. We will continue to engage on diversity of the board in other markets and may vote against the re-election of directors where we fail to see improvements.
Majority vote on election of directors
Because we believe the election of directors by a majority of votes cast is the appropriate standard, we will generally support proposals that seek to adopt such a standard. Our support will typically extend to situations where the relevant company has an existing resignation policy for directors that receive a majority of “withhold” votes. We believe majority voting should be defined in the company’s charter and not simply in its corporate governance policy.
As of December 2022
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
Generally, we oppose proposals that fail to provide for the exceptional use of a plurality standard in the case of contested elections. Further, we will not support proposals that seek to adopt a standard of majority of votes outstanding (total votes eligible as opposed to votes cast). We likely will support shareholder and management proposals to remove existing supermajority vote requirements.
We generally support proposals to remove existing supermajority vote requirements.
B-36
Contested director elections
We approach contested director elections on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances of each situation to determine what we believe to be in the best financial interest of our clients. In each case, we welcome the opportunity to engage with both the company and the proponent to ensure that we understand both perspectives and are making an informed decision on our clients’ behalf.
Compensation
Executive compensation plans establish the incentive structure that plays a role in strategy-setting, decision-making, and risk management. While design and structure vary widely, we believe the most effective compensation plans attract and retain high-caliber executives, foster a culture of performance and accountability, and align management’s interests with those of long-term shareholders.
Due to each company’s unique circumstances and wide range of plan structures, Wellington determines support for a compensation plan on a case-by-case basis. We support plans that we believe lead to long-term value creation for our clients and the right to vote on compensation plans annually.
In evaluating compensation plans, we consider the following attributes in the context of the company’s business, size, industry, and geographic location:
Alignment — We believe in pay-for-performance and encourage plan structures that align executive compensation with shareholder experience. We compare total compensation to performance metrics on an absolute and relative basis over various timeframes, and we look for a strong positive correlation. To ensure shareholder alignment, executives should maintain meaningful equity ownership in the company while they are employed, and for a period thereafter.
Transparency — We expect compensation committees to articulate the decision-making process and rationale behind the plan structure, and to provide adequate disclosure so shareholders can evaluate actual compensation relative to the committee’s intentions. Disclosure should include how metrics, targets, and timeframes are chosen, and detail desired outcomes. We also seek to understand how the compensation committee determines the target level of compensation and constructs the peer group for benchmarking purposes.
Structure — The plan should be clear and comprehensible. We look for a mix of cash versus equity, fixed versus variable, and short- versus long-term pay that incentivizes appropriate risk-taking and aligns with industry practice. Performance targets should be achievable but rigorous, and equity awards should be subject to performance and/or vesting periods of at least three years, to discourage executives from managing the business with a near-term focus. Unless otherwise specified by local market regulators, performance-based compensation should be based on metrics that are objective, rigorous, and tied to shareholder value creation. Qualitative goals may be acceptable if a compensation committee has demonstrated a fair and consistent approach to evaluating qualitative performance and applying discretion over time.
As of December 2022
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
Accountability — Compensation committees should be able to use discretion, positive and negative, to ensure compensation aligns with performance and provide a cogent explanation to shareholders. We generally oppose one-time awards aimed at retention or achieving a pre-determined goal. Barring an extenuating circumstance, we view retesting provisions unfavorably.
B-37
Approving equity incentive plans
A well-designed equity incentive plan facilitates the alignment of interests of long-term shareholders, management, employees, and directors. We evaluate equity-based compensation plans on a case-by-case basis, considering projected plan costs, plan features, and grant practices. We will reconsider our support for a plan if we believe these factors, on balance, are not in the best financial interest of shareholders. Specific items of concern may include excessive cost or dilution, unfavorable change-in-control features, insufficient performance conditions, holding/vesting periods, or stock ownership requirements, repricing stock options/stock appreciation rights (SARs) without prior shareholder approval, or automatic share replenishment (an “evergreen” feature).
Employee stock purchase plans
We generally support employee stock purchase plans, as they may align employees’ interests with those of shareholders. That said, we typically vote against plans that do not offer shares to a broad group of employees (e.g., if only executives can participate) or plans that offer shares at a significant discount.
Non-executive director compensation
We expect companies to disclose non-executive director compensation and we prefer the use of an annual retainer or fee, delivered as cash, equity, or a combination. We do not believe non-executive directors should receive performance-based compensation, as this creates a potential conflict of interest. Non-executive directors oversee executive compensation plans; their objectivity is compromised if they design a plan that they also participate in.
Severance arrangements
We are mindful of the board’s need for flexibility in recruitment and retention but will oppose excessively generous arrangements unless agreements encourage management to negotiate in shareholders’ best financial interest. We generally support proposals calling for shareholder ratification of severance arrangements.
Retirement bonuses (Japan)
Misaligned compensation which is based on tenure and seniority may compromise director independence. We generally vote against directors and statutory auditors if retirement bonuses are given to outgoing directors.
Claw-back policies
We believe companies should be able to recoup incentive compensation from members of management who received awards based on fraudulent activities, accounting misstatements, or breaches in standards of conduct that lead to corporate reputational damage. We generally support shareholder proposals requesting that a company establish a robust claw-back provision if existing policies do not cover these circumstances. We also support proposals seeking greater transparency about the application of claw back policies.
Audit quality and oversight
Scrutiny of auditors, particularly audit quality and oversight, has been increasing. When we assess financial statement reporting and audit quality, we will generally support management’s choice of auditors, unless the auditors have demonstrated failure to act in shareholders’ best economic interest. We also pay close attention to the non-audit services provided by auditors and consider the potential for the revenue from those services to create conflicts of interest that could compromise the integrity of financial statement audits.
B-38
As of December 2022
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
Shareholder Rights
Shareholder rights plans
Also known as poison pills, these plans can enable boards of directors to negotiate higher takeover prices on behalf of shareholders. Such plans also may be misused, however, as a means of entrenching management. Consequently, we may support plans that include a shareholder approval requirement, a sunset provision, or a permitted bid feature (e.g., bids that are made for all shares and demonstrate evidence of financing must be submitted to a shareholder vote).
Because boards generally have the authority to adopt shareholder rights plans without shareholder approval, we are equally vigilant in our assessment of requests for authorization of blank-check preferred shares.
Multiple voting rights
We generally support one share, one vote structures. The growing practice of going public with a dual-class share structure can raise governance and performance concerns. In our view, dual-class shares can create misalignment between shareholders’ economic stake and their voting power and can grant control to a small number of insiders who may make decisions that are not in the interests of all shareholders.
We generally prefer that companies dispense with dual-class share structures but we recognize that newly listed companies may benefit from a premium by building in some protection for founders for a limited time after their IPO. The Council of Institutional Investors, a nonprofit association of pension funds, endowments, and foundations, recommends that newly public companies that adopt structures with unequal voting rights do away with the structure within seven years of going public. We believe such sunset clauses are a reasonable compromise between founders seeking to defend against takeover attempts in pivotal early years, and shareholders demanding a mechanism for holding management accountable, especially in the event of leadership changes.
Similarly, we generally do not support the introduction of loyalty shares, which grant increased voting rights to investors who hold shares over multiple years.
Proxy access
We believe shareholders should have the right to nominate director candidates on the management’s proxy card. We will generally support shareholder proposals seeking proxy access unless the existing policy is already in-line with market norms.
Special meeting rights
We believe the right to call a special meeting is an important shareholder right, and we will generally support such proposals to establish this right at companies that lack this facility. We will generally support a proposal lowering thresholds where the current level exceeds 15% and the proposal calls for a 10%+ threshold, taking into consideration the make-up of the existing shareholder base and the company’s general responsiveness to shareholders. If shareholders are granted the right to call special meetings, we generally do not support written consent.
B-39
Capital structure and capital allocation
Mergers and acquisitions
We approach votes to approve mergers and acquisitions on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances of each proposal to determine what we believe to be in the best financial interest of our clients.
As of December 2022
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
Increases in authorized common stock
We generally support requests for increases up to 100% of the shares with preemption rights. Exceptions will be made when the company has clearly articulated a reasonable need for a greater increase. Conversely, at companies trading in less liquid markets, we may impose a lower threshold. When companies seek to issue shares without preemptive rights, we consider potential dilution and generally support requests when dilution is below 20%. For issuance with preemptive rights, we review on a case-by-case basis, considering the size of issuance relative to peers.
Capital allocation (Japan)
We hold board chairs accountable for persistently low returns on equity (ROE) in Japan, using a five-year average ROE of below 5% as a guide. Our assessment of a company’s capital stewardship complements our assessment of board effectiveness without dictating specific capital allocation decisions. We may make exceptions where ROE is improving, where a long-cycle business warrants a different standard, or where new management is in place, and we feel they should not be punished for the past CEO/Chair’s record.
Cross-shareholdings (Japan)
Cross-shareholdings reduce management accountability by creating a cushion of cross-over investor support. We may vote against the highest-ranking director up for re-election for companies where management has allocated a significant portion (20% or more) of net assets to cross-shareholdings. When considering this issue, we will take into account a company’s trajectory in reducing cross-shareholdings over time as well as legitimate business reasons given to retain specific shareholdings.
environmental Topics
We assess portfolio companies’ performance on environmental issues we deem to be material to long-term financial performance and communicate our expectations for best practice.
Climate change
As an asset manager entrusted with investing on our clients’ behalf, we aim to assess, monitor, and manage the potential effects of climate change on our investment processes and financial returns of client portfolios. Proxy voting is a key tool we use for managing climate-related investment risks, as part of our stewardship escalation process.
We expect companies facing material climate risks to have credible transition plans communicated using the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Appropriate reporting on climate readiness will help stakeholders understand those companies’ willingness and ability to adapt to or mitigate material climate-related risks. In addition to the voting policies specifically mentioned, we may also vote against directors at companies facing material climate risks where climate plans and disclosures meaningfully lag our expectations for those companies.
B-40
Emissions disclosure
We generally encourage all companies to disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. While we recognize the challenges associated with collecting Scope 3 emissions data, this disclosure is necessary for us to fully understand the transition risks applicable to an issuer. Disclosure of both overall categories of Scope 3 emissions – upstream and downstream – with context and granularity from companies about the most significant Scope 3 sources enhances our ability to evaluate investment risks and opportunities. We generally encourage companies to adopt emerging global standards for measurement and disclosure of emissions such as those being developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and believe companies will benefit from acting now and consequently evolving their approach in line with emerging global standards.
We view disclosure of Scope 1 and 2 emissions as a minimum expectation where measurement practices are well-defined and attainable. We will generally vote against the re-election of the Chair of MSCI World companies, Climate Action 100+ companies, as well as companies assessed by the Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) which do not disclose Scope 1 and 2 emissions, have not made a commitment to do so in the next year and where emissions intensity is material to financial performance. We will expand this expectation to large cap companies in Emerging Markets in 2024.
As of December 2022
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
Net-zero targets
As an outcome of enterprise risk management and strategic planning to reduce the potential negative financial impacts of climate change on shareholder value, we encourage companies to set a credible, science-based decarbonization glidepath, with an interim and long- term target, that comprises all categories of material emissions and is consistent with the ambition to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner. For Climate Action 100+ companies we reserve the right to vote against the company chair where quantitative emission reduction targets have not been defined. We consider it to be best practice for companies to pursue validation from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
We generally support shareholder proposals asking companies facing material climate risks for improved disclosure on climate risk management and we generally support those that request alignment of business strategies with the Paris Agreement or similar language.
Other environmental shareholder proposals
For other environmental proposals covering themes including biodiversity, natural capital, deforestation, water usage, (plastic) packaging as well as palm oil, we take a case-by-case approach and will generally support proposals calling for companies to provide disclosure where this is additive to the company’s existing efforts, the proposed information pertains to a material financial impact and in our view is of economic benefit to investors.
Social Topics
Corporate culture, human capital, and diversity, equity, & inclusion
B-41
Through engagement we emphasize to management the importance of how they invest in and cultivate their human capital to perpetuate a strong culture. We assess culture holistically from an alignment of management incentives, responsiveness to employee feedback, evidence of an equitable and sound talent management strategy and commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion practices that promote shareholder value. We value transparency and use of key performance indicators.
A well-articulated culture statement and talent attraction, retention and development strategy suggest that a company appreciates culture and talent as competitive advantages that can drive long-term value creation. It also sends a strong message when management compensation is linked, when appropriate, to employee satisfaction. If the company conducts regular employee engagement surveys, we look for leadership to disclose the results — both positive and negative — so we can monitor patterns and assess whether they are implementing changes based on the feedback they receive. We consider workplace locations and how a company balances attracting talent with the costs of operating in desirable cities.
We maintain that a deliberate human capital management strategy should foster a collaborative, productive workplace in which all talent can thrive. One ongoing engagement issue that pertains to human capital management is diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). We see DEI practices as a material input to long-term financial performance, so as our clients’ fiduciaries, we seek to better understand how and to what extent a company’s approach to diversity is integrated with talent management at all levels. This is only possible when there is consistent, robust disclosure in place. A sound long-term plan holds more weight than a company’s current demographics, so we look for a demonstrable DEI strategy that seeks to improve shareholder value over time and align management incentives accordingly. To that end, we expect companies in the US to publicly disclose their EEO-1 reporting and all companies to disclose their DEI strategy
Gender and racial pay equity are important parts of our assessment of a company’s diversity efforts. Pay inequity can impact shareholder value by exposing a company to challenges with recruiting & retaining talent, job dissatisfaction, workforce turnover, and costly lawsuits. Consequently, we may support proposals asking for improved transparency on a company’s gender and/or racial pay gap if existing disclosures are lagging best practice and if the company has not articulated its efforts to promote equal opportunities to advance to senior roles.
We believe diversity among directors, leaders, and employees contributes positively to shareholder value by imbuing a company with myriad perspectives that help it better navigate complex challenges. A strong culture of diversity and inclusion begins in the boardroom. See the Board Diversity section above for more on our approach.
As of December 2022
2023 Global Proxy Voting Guidelines
Stakeholders and risk management
In recent years, discourse on opioids, firearms, and sexual harassment has brought the potential for social externalities —the negative effects that companies can have on society through their products, cultures, or policies — into sharp focus. These nuanced, often misunderstood issues can affect the value of corporate securities.
We encourage companies facing these risks to disclose related risk management strategies. When a company faces litigation or negative press, we inquire about lessons learned and request evidence of substantive changes that aim to prevent recurrence and mitigate downside risk. In these cases, we may also support proposals requesting enhanced disclosure on actions taken by management.
B-42
Human rights
Following the 2015 passage of the UK’s Modern Slavery Act, a handful of countries have passed laws requiring companies to report on how they are addressing risks related to human rights abuses in their global supply chains. While human rights have been a part of our research and engagement in this context, we seek to assess companies’ exposures to these risks, determine the sectors for which this risk is most material (highest possibility of supply-chain exposure), enhance our own engagement questions, and potentially work with external data providers to gain insights on specific companies or industries. To help us assess company practices and drive more substantive engagement with companies on this issue, we will generally support proposals requesting enhanced disclosure on companies’ approach to mitigating the risk of human rights violations in their business.
Cybersecurity
Robust cybersecurity practices are imperative for maintaining customer trust, preserving brand strength, and mitigating regulatory risk. Companies that fail to strengthen their cybersecurity platforms may end up bearing large costs. Through engagement, we aim to compare companies’ approaches to cyber threats, regardless of region or sector, to distinguish businesses that lag from those that are better prepared.
Political contributions and lobbying
We generally support shareholder proposals asking for enhanced disclosure and board oversight of a company’s political and lobbying activities where existing disclosure and board oversight are inadequate. This is because sufficient disclosure and board oversight are necessary to evaluate whether and ensure that these activities align with the company’s stated strategy and promote shareholder value.
Important Information
Wellington Management Company LLP (WMC) is an independently owned investment adviser registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). WMC is also registered with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a commodity trading advisor (CTA) and serves as a CTA to certain clients including commodity pools operated by registered commodity pool operators. WMC provides commodity trading advice to all other clients in reliance on exemptions from CTA registration. WMC, along with its affiliates (collectively, Wellington Management), provides investment management and investment advisory services to institutions around the world. Located in Boston, Massachusetts, Wellington Management also has offices in Chicago, Illinois; Radnor, Pennsylvania; San Francisco, California; Frankfurt; Hong Kong; London; Luxembourg; Madrid, Milan; Shanghai; Singapore; Sydney; Tokyo; Toronto; and Zurich.
This material is prepared for, and authorized for internal use by, designated institutional and professional investors and their consultants or for such other use as may be authorized by Wellington Management. This material and/or its contents are current at the time of writing and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part, for any purpose, without the express written consent of Wellington Management. This material is not intended to constitute investment advice or an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to purchase shares or other securities. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment manager or to invest in a fund. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s), are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients.
©2022 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved.
As of December 2022
B-43
PART C: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 28. | Exhibits |
(c) | Not applicable. |
(e)(4) | |
(e)(5) | Distribution Agreement, dated December 10, 2024, between the Registrant and Distribution Services, LLC is filed herewith. |
(f) | Not applicable. |
(h)(19) | Amended and Restated Advisory Fee Limitation Agreement, dated August 1, 2024, between the Registrant and Aspiriant, LLC is filed herewith. |
(h)(20) | Amended and Restated Administrative Services Fee Limitation Agreement, dated August 1, 2024, between the Registrant and Aspiriant, LLC is filed herewith. |
(j) | Consent of independent registered public accountant firm is filed herewith. |
(k) | Not applicable. |
(l) | Not applicable. |
(n) |
(o) | Not applicable. |
(p)(4) | Code of Ethics of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC is filed herewith. |
(p)(6) | Code of Ethics of Allspring Global Investments, LLC is filed herewith. |
Item 29. | Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with the Fund |
Not Applicable.
Item 30. | Indemnification |
The Registrant is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is operated pursuant to its Declaration of Trust, which permits the Registrant to indemnify its trustees and officers under certain circumstances. Such indemnification, however, is subject to the limitations imposed by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Declaration of Trust provides that the Registrant’s officers and trustees shall be indemnified by the Registrant against liabilities and expenses of defense in proceedings against them by reason of the fact that they each serve as an officer or trustee of the Registrant or as an officer or trustee of another entity at the request of the entity.
Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer, or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
Item 31. | Business and Other Connections of the Investment Adviser |
Any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature that each adviser and each director, officer or partner of each adviser is or has been engaged within the last two fiscal years for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee is as follows:
Aspiriant, LLC
Aspiriant, LLC (the “Adviser”) serves as the investment adviser for each series of the Registrant. The principal address of the Adviser is 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 600, Los Angeles, California 90025. The Adviser is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Name and Position with Adviser | Name of Other Company | Connection with Other Company |
Baca, Dawn, Partner | Strategic Planning Law Group, P.C. | Owner |
Stevens, Clay R., Partner | Strategic Planning Law Group, P.C. | Owner |
Punim, Melissa, Partner | Strategic Planning Law Group, P.C. | Owner |
Allspring Global Investments, LLC
Allspring Global Investments, LLC (“Allspring Investments”) serves as investment sub-adviser for the Registrant’s Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund. The principal address of Allspring Investments is 1415 Vantage Park Drive, 3rd Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203. Allspring Investments is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Name and Position with Allspring | Other
Business, Profession, Vocation or Employment During Past Two Years |
Sallie Clements Squire, Chief Operating Officer | Manager, Chief Operating Officer of Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC; Chief Operating Officer of Allspring Funds Distributor, LLC; Chief Operating Officer of Allspring Funds Management, LLC; Chief Operating Officer of Galliard Capital Management, LLC. |
Francis Jon Baranko, President, Chief Investment Officer | None |
Annette Lege, Chief Financial Officer | Chief Financial Officer (since 2024) of Allspring Global Investment Holdings, LLC; Chief Financial Officer (since 2024) of Allspring Funds Management, LLC; Chief Financial Officer (since 2024) of Allspring Funds Distributor, LLC. |
Jimmy Tran, Chief Compliance Officer | None |
Aperio Group, LLC
Aperio Group, LLC (“Aperio”) serves as investment sub-adviser for the Registrant’s Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund. The principal address of Aperio is Three Harbor Drive, Suite 204, Sausalito, California 94965. Aperio is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Aperio Group, LLC is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc., a publicly traded company. Upon acquisition by BlackRock in February 2021, Aperio was vertically integrated into the firm as a part of the US Wealth Advisory (“USWA”) business. Decisions are primarily made at both the Aperio business unit level as well as in partnership with USWA leadership.
During the past two fiscal years of the Registrant, none of the directors, officers or partners of Aperio is or has been engaged in any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee. Any outside business interests are carefully screened to prevent potential or actual conflicts of interest. Pre-approval must be obtained prior to entering into any outside business relationship.
Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC
Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC (“GMO”) serves as investment sub-adviser for the Registrant’s Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund. The principal address of GMO is 53 State Street, 33rd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. GMO is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Name and Position with GMO | Other Business, Profession, Vocation or Employment During Past Two Years |
R. Jeremy Grantham, Founding Member, Member and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Chief Investment Strategist | Advisor, Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India; Advisory Board Member, Imperial College of London – Grantham Institute for Climate Change, London SW7 2AZ; Steering Committee, London School of Economics – Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE; Trustee, The Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, 53 State Street, Floor 33, Boston, MA 02109; Trustee, The Jeremy and Hannelore Grantham Environmental Trust, 53 State Street, Floor 33, Boston, MA 02109; Advisory Member, Koop Family Office, 2200 Geng Rd., Suite 100, Palo Alto, CA 94303; Governing Board, Society for the Protection of Underground Networks, Dover, Delaware; Advisory Board, Grantham Centre for Sustainable Futures, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN. |
Mitchell Harris, Member of the Board of Directors | Senior Advisor, HarbourVest Partners, LLC, One Lincoln Street, Suite 1700, Boston, MA 02111; Director and Chairman, ODDO BHF UK Limited, 3rd Floor, 91 Jermyn Street, London, United Kingdom, SW1Y 6JB. |
Scott L. Hayward, Chief Executive Officer, Member of the Board of Directors | Trustee, The Christine and Scott Hayward Charitable Fund, Vanguard, 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355; Advisory Board Member, Give to the World, P.O. Box 6183, Arlington, VA 22206; Boston College Board of Regents; Mass General Children’s Hospital Advisory Board; Advisory Board Member, The Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University, 1364 Campus Drive, Durham, NC 27705. |
Anthony Hene, Portfolio Manager, Focused Equity, Member of the Board of Directors | None |
Ben Inker, Co-Head of Asset Allocation, Member of the Board of Directors | Member of Investment Committee, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; Investment Committee, Open Society Foundation, 224 W 57 Street, New York, NY 10019. |
Margaret McGetrick, Member and Vice Chair of the Board of Directors | Board of Trustees and Chairman of the Finance, Audit and Risk Committees and Member of the Investment Committee, Save the Children US, 501 Kings Highway East, Suite 400, Fairfield CT 06825; Board of Trustees, member of Finance Committee, Save the Children International, St. Vincent House, 30 Orange Street, London WC2H 7HH, United Kingdom; Board member, Loar Group Inc., 20 New King St., White Plains, NY 10604 |
Andrea Muller, Member of the Board of Directors | Advisory Board Member, Georgetown University Law Center Business Law Scholar’s Program, 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001. |
Mark Nitzberg, Member of the Board of Directors | Board Member, Akvo Foundation, USA, 1110 Vermont Ave. NW Ste 500, Washington, DC 20005; Advisory Board Member, Cambrian Group, 2381 Eunice St., Berkeley, CA 94708; Executive Director, CHAI, The University of California, Berkeley, 253 Cory Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720; Head of Strategic Outreach, BAIR, The University of California, Berkeley, 253 Cory Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720; Board Member, Krypton Medical Inc., Greenwich, CT; Member of Technology Advisory Group, RAND Corporation, P.O. Box 2138, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Board Member, Interim Executive Director, Secretary and Treasurer, International Association for Safe and Ethical Artificial Intelligence, 501 W. Broadway, Suite 1540, San Diego, CA 92101. |
Eyk Van Otterloo, Founding Member | Board Member, Stichting Administratiekantoor Houthavens Beheer, Stichting Administratiekantoor Investment 1926, Stichting Administratiekantoor Hot Item Onroerend Goed, Stichting Administratiekantoor Decca Vastgoed, Danzigerkade 69, 1013 AP Amsterdam, Board Member, Artory Inc., 41 East 11th Street, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10003; Board Member, GCTH Ipswich LLC, 351 Topsfield Rd., Ipswich, MA 01938. |
MacKay Shields LLC
MacKay Shields LLC (“MacKay Shields”) serves as investment sub-adviser for the Registrant’s Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund. The principal address of MacKay Shields is 299 Park Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, New York 10171. MacKay Shields is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The names of the persons/entities mentioned below is consistent with information provided in Schedule A (Direct Owners and Executive Officers) and Schedule B (Indirect Owners) of MacKay’s Form ADV Part 1A.
Name and Position with MacKay Shields | Other Business, Profession, Vocation or Employment During Past Two Years |
Rene Arturo Bustamante, Executing Managing Director & Chief Administrative Officer | None |
John Michael Loffredo, Vice Chairman, Executive Managing Director & Portfolio Manager | None |
Robert Alan DiMella, Executing Managing Director & Portfolio Manager | None |
Young (NMN) Lee, Senior Managing Director & General Counsel | None |
Michael Daniel Corker, Senior Managing Director & Chief Financial Officer | None |
Andrew Mark Susser, Executing Managing Director & Portfolio Manager | None |
Naim Abou-Jaoude, Chairman of Board of Managers | Chief Executive Officer, New York Life Investment Management LLC; Chairman, CANDRIAM’s Board of Directors; Formerly Chief Executive Officer, CANDRIAM; Formerly Interim-Chief Executive Officer, MacKay Shields LLC |
Kirk C. Lehneis, Member of Board of Managers | Senior Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, New York Life Investment Management LLC; President, NYLI Funds and NYLI Funds Trust, ETFs and Head of U.S. Retail |
Francis Michael Harte, Member of Board of Managers | Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer, New York Life Investment Management LLC. |
Alain Maurice Karaoglan, Member of Board of Managers | Executive Vice President and Head of Strategic Businesses, New York Life Insurance Company |
Christopher Paul Fitzgerald, Managing Director & Chief Compliance Officer | None |
Dale Myunkiew Sang, Senior Managing Director & Chief Technology and Operations Officer | None |
Michael (NMN) DePalma, Senior Managing Director and Portfolio Manager | None |
(Neil) Cornelius Joseph Moriarty, Senior Managing Director and Portfolio Manager | None |
Alison Hiers Micucci, Chief Executive Officer and Member of Board of Managers | Prior to January 2025, served as Head of New York Life Direct |
Craig Andrew Sabal, Member of Board of Managers | Senior Managing Director and Deputy Chief Investment Officer of New York Life and Head of Fixed Income Investors |
New York Life Investment Management Holdings LLC | Sole Member |
New York Life Insurance Company | Indirect Interest Holder |
Nuveen Asset Management, LLC
Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Nuveen”) serves as investment sub-adviser for the Registrant’s Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund. The principal address of Nuveen is 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606. Nuveen is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Name and Position with Nuveen | Other
Business, Profession, Vocation or Employment During Past Two Years |
William T. Huffman President
|
Chief Executive Officer (since 2024) of Nuveen, LLC; Executive Vice President (since 2020) of Nuveen Securities, LLC and Nuveen, LLC; President, Nuveen Investments, Inc. (since 2020), Teachers Advisors, LLC and TIAA-CREF Investment Management, LLC (since 2019); Senior Managing Director (since 2019) of Nuveen Alternative Advisors LLC; Senior Managing Director (since 2022) and Chairman (since 2019) of Churchill Asset Management LLC. |
Stuart J. Cohen, Managing Director, Head of Legal and Assistant Secretary | Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (since 2002) of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2007) and Assistant Secretary (since 2003) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Managing Director, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary (since 2019) of Teachers Advisors, LLC; Managing Director, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary (since 2019) of TIAA-CREF Investment Management, LLC; Vice President and Assistant Secretary (since 2008) of Winslow Capital Management, LLC; formerly, Vice President (2007-2021) and Assistant Secretary (2003-2021) of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC; formerly Vice President (2007-2021) and Assistant Secretary (2006-2021) of Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC. |
Travis M. Pauley, Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer | Regional Head of Compliance and Regulatory Legal (2013-2020) of AXA Investment Managers. |
Jon M. Stevens, Senior Managing Director, Head of Business & Investment Operations | Senior Managing Director, Head of Business & Investment Operations (since 2017) of Nuveen; Director of Research (1984-2017) of Nuveen. |
Kehinde Akibayo, Managing Director and Controller | Managing Director and Controller of Nuveen (since May 2025), formerly VP, Accounting Policy and Internal Controls – Nuveen (2021 – 2025), Senior Manager, Internal Controls – TIAA (2020-2021), Senior Manager – KPMG LLP (2016-2020), Associate Manager – KPMG LLP (2009 – 2016) |
Saira Malik, Executive Vice President, President Nuveen Equity and Fixed Income and Chief Investment Officer | Executive Vice President, President Nuveen Equity and Fixed Income Executive & Chief Investment Officer (since 2024), Chief Investment Officer & Head of Equity of Nuveen (2022-2024) Head of Global Equity Portfolio Management & Global Portfolio Manager (2014-2017), Head of Global Equities Research & Global portfolio manager (2007-2014), Equity Research Analyst (2003-2007), Small Cap Growth Portfolio Manager – JP Morgan Asset Management (1995-2002) |
Wellington Management Company LLP
Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”) serves as investment sub-adviser for the Registrant’s Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund. The principal address of Wellington is 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. Wellington is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
During the past two fiscal years of the Registrant, none of the directors, officers or partners of Wellington is or has been engaged in any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature for his or her own account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee.
Item 32. | Principal Underwriters |
(a) In addition to the Registrant, Distribution Services, LLC (formerly, UMB Distribution Services, LLC) serves as the principal underwriter for the following other investment companies:
AOG Institutional Fund
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Real Assets Fund
EP Emerging Markets Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust
EuroPac Gold Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust
EuroPac International Bond Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust
EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust
EuroPac International Value Fund, Series of Investment Managers Series Trust
E-Valuator Funds Trust
Felicitas Private Markets Fund
FlowStone Opportunity Fund
Green Century Funds
Hamilton Lane Private Assets Fund
Hamilton Lane Private Infrastructure Fund
Investment Managers Series Trust III
MA Specialty Credit Income Fund
Monachil Credit Income Fund
Pender Real Estate Credit Fund
Redwood Real Estate Income Fund
StepStone Private Credit Income Fund
StepStone Private Infrastructure Fund
StepStone Private Markets
StepStone Private Venture and Growth Fund
The Marsico Investment Fund
Thirdline Real Estate Income
Variant Alternative Income Fund
Variant Alternative Lending Fund
Variant Impact Fund
(b) The officers of Distribution Services, LLC are:
Name and Principal Business Address(1) |
Positions and Offices with Principal Underwriter |
Positions and Offices with Registrant |
Teresa Cowan | President | None |
Chris Lanza | Vice President | None |
Kate Macchia | Vice President | None |
Gordon B. Taylor | Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer | None |
Kelly B. Whetstone | Secretary | None |
Susan L. LaFond | Treasurer | None |
Weston Sommers | Financial and Operations Principal and Chief Financial Officer | None |
(1) | Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, Maine, 04101 |
Item 33. | Location of Accounts and Records |
All accounts, books, and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder are maintained at the following offices:
(a) | Registrant: |
c/o Aspiriant, LLC
11100 Santa Monica Boulevard
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90025
(b) | Adviser: |
Aspiriant, LLC
11100 Santa Monica Boulevard
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90025
(c) | Sub-Advisers: |
Allspring Global Investments, LLC (for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund only)
1415 Vantage Park Drive, 3rd Floor
Charlotte, NC 28203
Aperio Group, LLC (for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund only)
Three Harbor Drive, Suite 204
Sausalito, CA 94965
Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC (for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund only)
53 State Street, 33rd Floor
Boston, MA 02109
MacKay Shields LLC (for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund only)
299 Park Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10171
Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Municipal Bond Fund only)
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Wellington Management Company LLP (for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund only)
280 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02110
(d) | Principal Underwriter: |
Distribution Services, LLC
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100
Portland, ME 04101
(e) | Custodian: |
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Seaport Center
70 Fargo Street
Boston, MA 02210-1950
(f) | Administrator: |
UMB Fund Services, Inc.
235 West Galena Street
Milwaukee, WI 53212
Item 34. | Management Services |
Not Applicable.
Item 35. | Undertakings |
Not Applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for effectiveness of this registration statement under Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized, in the City of Los Angeles, State of California on this 29th day of July 2025.
Aspiriant Trust | ||
/s/ Robert J. Francais | ||
Robert J. Francais | ||
President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Robert J. Francais | President (Principal Executive Officer) | July 29, 2025 | ||
Robert J. Francais | ||||
Douglas S. Hendrickson* | Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) | July 29, 2025 | ||
Douglas S. Hendrickson | ||||
Michael D. LeRoy* | Trustee | July 29, 2025 | ||
Michael D. LeRoy | ||||
Robert D. Taylor* | Trustee | July 29, 2025 | ||
Robert D. Taylor | ||||
Robert Wagman* | Trustee | July 29, 2025 | ||
Robert Wagman |
* | /s/ Benjamin D. Schmidt | |
Benjamin D. Schmidt | ||
Attorney-in-fact pursuant to power of attorney |
Exhibit Index