Use of Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited condensed financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ materially and adversely from these estimates.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ materially and adversely from these estimates.

Segments

The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), the Chief Executive Officer, manages the Company’s business activities as a single operating and reportable segment. Accordingly, the Company’s CODM uses net income/loss to measure the Company’s single segment’s performance and allocate resources. Further, the CODM reviews and utilizes functional expenses (general and administrative and research and development) to manage the Company’s operations. The Company’s general and administrative expenses for each of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 included approximately $38 thousand of compensation expenses related to the compensation agreement the Company has executed with its Chief Executive Officer. The remaining general and administrative expenses are related to legal and accounting-related expenses for contractors. The Company’s research and development expenses did not include any compensation-related expenses. Other segment items included in net loss are interest expense, related parties and interest income which are reflected in the Company’s unaudited condensed statements of operations.

Segments

The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), the Chief Executive Officer, manages the Company’s business activities as a single operating and reportable segment. Accordingly, the Company’s CODM uses net income/loss to measure the Company’s single segment’s performance and allocate resources. Further, the CODM reviews and utilizes functional expenses (general and administrative and research and development) to manage the Company’s operations. The Company’s general and administrative expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 included approximately $0.2 million of compensation expense related to the compensation agreement the Company has executed with its Chief Executive Officer. The remaining general and administrative expenses related to legal and accounting-related expenses for contractors. The Company’s research and development expenses did not include any compensation-related expenses. Other segment items included in net loss are interest expense, related parties and interest income which are reflected in the Company’s statements of operations.

Deferred Transaction Costs

Deferred transaction costs represent costs incurred in connection with preparation for the proposed business combination which deferred until the business combination is completed and will be considered a reduction in additional paid in capital upon the business combination.

Deferred Transaction Costs

Costs incurred in connection with preparation for the proposed business combination are deferred on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value and classifies those inputs into three levels:

Level 1 — Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the instrument’s anticipated life.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

To the extent the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgement. Accordingly, the degree of judgement exercised by management in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized as Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The carrying values reported in the Company’s unaudited condensed balance sheets for loan receivable, amounts due to research and development partner, due from related party, accounts payable and accrued expenses, short-term debt, accrued interest, related parties and due to related parties are reasonable estimates of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these items.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value and classifies those inputs into three levels:

Level 1 — Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the instrument’s anticipated life.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

To the extent the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgement. Accordingly, the degree of judgement exercised by management in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized as Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The carrying values reported in the Company’s balance sheets for loan receivable, amounts due to research and development partner, due from related party, accounts payable and accrued expenses, short-term debt, accrued interest, related parties and due to related parties are reasonable estimates of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these items.

Income Taxes

The Company is taxed as a partnership for United States income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, thus the income or loss of the Company flows to the members. As a partnership for income tax purposes, the Company is not subject to tax and any tax liability is the responsibility of the members of the Company. Accordingly, no provision for federal and state income taxes is included in the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Net Loss per Member Unit

The Company calculates basic and diluted net loss per member unit in accordance with the two-class method required for participating securities. The Company has two classes of member units, which are referred to as Class A member units and Class B member units. Class B member units are allocated 51% of earnings and losses, and Class A member units are allocated 49% of earnings and losses. The two-class method requires net loss for the period to be allocated between the member units.

Basic net loss per member unit is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of member units outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per member unit excludes the potential impact of the Company’s warrants and options because their effect would be anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss for the periods presented.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used to compute basic and diluted net loss per member unit for each class of member units (in thousands, except member unit and per member unit information):


	For the three months ended March 31,
	2025				2024
	Class A		Class B		Class A		Class B
Basic and diluted net loss per member unit:
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(161)	$	(167)	$	(859)	$	(895)
Denominator
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding		95,555,554		16,666,666		95,555,554		16,666,666
Basic and diluted net loss per member unit	$	(0.00)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.05)

Net Loss per Member Unit

The Company calculates basic and diluted net loss per member unit in accordance with the two-class method required for participating securities. The Company has two classes of member units, which are referred to as Class A member units and Class B member units. Class B member units are allocated 51% of earnings and losses, and Class A member units are allocated 49% of earnings and losses. The two-class method requires net loss for the period to be allocated between the member units.

Basic net loss per member unit is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of member units outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per member unit excludes the potential impact of the Company’s warrants and options because their effect would be anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss for the periods presented.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used to compute basic and diluted net loss per member unit for each class of member units (in thousands, except member unit and per member unit information):


	For the year ended December 31,
	2024				2023
	Class A		Class B		Class A		Class B
Basic and diluted net loss per member unit:
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(1,738)	$	(1,808)	$	(2,442)	$	(2,542)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding		95,555,554		16,666,666		85,825,570		16,666,666
Basic and diluted net loss per member unit	$	(0.02)	$	(0.11)	$	(0.03)	$	(0.15)

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - Not Yet Adopted

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

On November 4, 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Accounting Standards Update 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses to improve financial reporting by requiring that public business entities disclose additional information about specific expense categories in the notes to financial statements at interim and annual reporting periods. The amendments in this ASU do not change or remove current expense disclosure requirements; however, the amendments affect where such information appears in the notes to financial statements because entities are required to include certain current disclosures in the same tabular format disclosure as the other disaggregation requirements in the amendments. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its financial statements.

Management does not believe that any additional recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements – Not Yet Adopted

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The standard requires entities to disclose additional categories about federal, state and foreign income taxes in the effective tax rate reconciliation as well as provide annual income taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its financial statements and related disclosures.

Management does not believe that any additional recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.