NOTE 3 – BUSINESS COMBINATION

Business Combination Agreement - On June 6, 2023, CERo Therapeutics, Inc. (“Predecessor”), which was incorporated in Delaware on September 23, 2016, and based in South San Francisco, California, entered into a Business Combination Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “BCA”) with PBCE Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBAX, and PBAX, with the surviving operating entity being named CERo Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (“Successor” or the “Company”), and such transaction, the “Business Combination” or “Merger”.

The Company is focused on genetically engineering human immune cells to fight cancer. The Predecessor focused on developing the CERo therapeutic platform and had not yet begun clinical development or product commercialization. The Company’s efforts will focus on continued product development, including clinical development, to support regulatory approval to commercialize and subsequent product commercialization.

The BCA was amended on February 5, 2024 and again on February 13, 2024. The Merger closed on February 14, 2024 (the “Closing”), at which time the following occurred:

The Company issued, transferred from the Sponsor, or reserved for issuance an aggregate of 4,200 shares of Common Stock to the holders of Predecessor common stock and Predecessor preferred stock or reserved for issuance upon exercise of rollover (from Predecessor to Successor) options and warrants as consideration in the Merger.

Asset Acquisition Method of Accounting - The Merger was accounted for using the asset acquisition method in accordance with GAAP. Under this method of accounting, PBAX was considered to be the accounting acquirer based on the terms of the Merger. Upon consummation of the Merger, the cash on hand resulted in the equity at risk being considered insufficient for Predecessor to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. Therefore, Predecessor was considered a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and the primary beneficiary of Predecessor was treated as the accounting acquirer. PBAX holds a variable interest in Predecessor and owns 100% of Predecessor’s equity. PBAX was considered the primary beneficiary as it has the decision-making rights that gives it the power to direct the most significant activities. Also, PBAX retained the obligation to absorb the losses and/or receive the benefits of Predecessor that could have potentially been significant to Predecessor. The Merger was accounted for as an asset acquisition as substantially all of the fair value was concentrated in IPR&D, an intangible asset. Predecessor’s assets (except for cash) and liabilities were measured at fair value as of the transaction date. Consistent with authoritative guidance on the consolidation of a VIE that is not considered a business, differences in the total purchase price and fair value of assets and liabilities are recorded as a gain or loss to the consolidated statement of operations. The loss reflected below on the consolidation of the VIE is reflected “on the line” (defined below) in the Company’s opening accumulated deficit.

Costs incurred in obtaining technology licenses are charged to research and development expense as IPR&D if the technology licensed has not reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. The IPR&D recorded at the Closing of $45.6 million is reflected “on the line” in the Company’s opening accumulated deficit. To estimate the value of the acquired IPR&D, the Company used the avoided cost method, which calculates a present value of a 45% return on research and development effort applied to research and development expenditures over the life of the Predecessor. The determination of the fair value requires management to make a significant estimate of the return on research and development expenditures. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value of the IPR&D. The estimate of the return on research and development expenditures was based on multiple published studies analyzing actual returns of research and development expenditures.

The following is a summary of the purchase price calculation:

The allocation of the purchase price was as follows:

In connection with the Merger, the transactions that occurred concurrently with the closing date of the Merger were reflected “on the line”. “On the line” describes those transactions triggered by the consummation of the Merger that are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor nor the Company as they are not directly attributable to either period but instead were contingent on the Merger. The opening cash balance in the consolidated statement of cash flow of $1.88 million consists of $0.92 million from PBAX and $0.96 million from Predecessor. The number of shares of Common Stock issued and amounts recorded on the line within stockholders’ deficit are reflected below to arrive at the opening consolidated balance sheet of the Company.

NOTE 3 – BUSINESS COMBINATION

Business Combination Agreement - On June 6, 2023, CERo Therapeutics, Inc. (“Predecessor”), which was incorporated in Delaware on September 23, 2016, and based in South San Francisco, California, entered into a Business Combination Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “BCA”) with PBCE Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBAX, and PBAX, with the surviving operating entity being named CERo Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (“Successor” or the “Company”), and such transaction, the “Business Combination” or “Merger”.

The Company is focused on genetically engineering human immune cells to fight cancer. The Predecessor focused on developing the CERo therapeutic platform and had not yet begun clinical development or product commercialization. The Company’s efforts will focus on continued product development, including clinical development, to support regulatory approval to commercialize and subsequent product commercialization.

The BCA was amended on February 5, 2024 and again on February 13, 2024. The Merger closed on February 14, 2024 (the “Closing”), at which time the following occurred:

The Company issued, transferred from the Sponsor, or reserved for issuance an aggregate of 4,200 shares of Common Stock to the holders of Predecessor common stock and Predecessor preferred stock or reserved for issuance upon exercise of rollover (from Predecessor to Successor) options and warrants as consideration in the Merger.

Asset Acquisition Method of Accounting - The Merger was accounted for using the asset acquisition method in accordance with GAAP. Under this method of accounting, PBAX was considered to be the accounting acquirer based on the terms of the Merger. Upon consummation of the Merger, the cash on hand resulted in the equity at risk being considered insufficient for Predecessor to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. Therefore, Predecessor was considered a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and the primary beneficiary of Predecessor was treated as the accounting acquirer. PBAX holds a variable interest in Predecessor and owns 100% of Predecessor’s equity. PBAX was considered the primary beneficiary as it has the decision-making rights that gives it the power to direct the most significant activities. Also, PBAX retained the obligation to absorb the losses and/or receive the benefits of Predecessor that could have potentially been significant to Predecessor. The Merger was accounted for as an asset acquisition as substantially all of the fair value was concentrated in IPR&D, an intangible asset. Predecessor’s assets (except for cash) and liabilities were measured at fair value as of the transaction date. Consistent with authoritative guidance on the consolidation of a VIE that is not considered a business, differences in the total purchase price and fair value of assets and liabilities are recorded as a gain or loss to the consolidated statement of operations. The loss reflected below on the consolidation of the VIE is reflected “on the line” (defined below) in the Company’s opening accumulated deficit.

Costs incurred in obtaining technology licenses are charged to research and development expense as IPR&D if the technology licensed has not reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. The IPR&D recorded at the Closing of $45.6 million is reflected “on the line” in the Company’s opening accumulated deficit. To estimate the value of the acquired IPR&D, the Company used the avoided cost method, which calculates a present value of a 45% return on research and development effort applied to research and development expenditures over the life of the Predecessor. The determination of the fair value requires management to make a significant estimate of the return on research and development expenditures. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value of the IPR&D. The estimate of the return on research and development expenditures was based on multiple published studies analyzing actual returns of research and development expenditures.

The following is a summary of the purchase price calculation:

The allocation of the purchase price was as follows:

In connection with the Merger, the transactions that occurred concurrently with the closing date of the Merger were reflected “on the line”. “On the line” describes those transactions triggered by the consummation of the Merger that are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor nor the Company as they are not directly attributable to either period but instead were contingent on the Merger. The opening cash balance in the consolidated statement of cash flow of $1.88 million consists of $0.92 million from PBAX and $0.96 million from Predecessor. The number of shares of Common Stock issued and amounts recorded on the line within stockholders’ deficit are reflected below to arrive at the opening consolidated balance sheet of the Company.