Emerging Growth Company Status

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Cash

Cash includes demand deposits with banks that the company may deposit additional funds at any time and also effectively may withdraw funds at any time without prior notice or penalty.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash account in a financial institution and marketable securities held in Trust Account which, at times may exceed the Federal depository insurance coverage of $250,000. Also, the Company maintains certain bank accounts in Hong Kong, where cash balances are protected under Deposit Protection Scheme in accordance with the Deposit Protection Scheme Ordinance, with the maximum protection of up to HKD500,000 per depositor per Scheme member, including both principal and interest. The Company has not experienced losses on this account and management believes the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such account.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, the methods used to measure fair value and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between the buyer and the seller at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the valuation techniques consistent with the market approach, income approach and cost approach shall be used to measure fair value. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for inputs, which represent the assumptions used by the buyer and seller in pricing the asset or liability. These inputs are further defined as observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are those that buyer and seller would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that the buyer and seller would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

The fair value hierarchy is categorized into three levels based on the inputs as follows:

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under ASC Topic 820 approximates the carrying amounts represented in the accompanying condensed balance sheet, primarily due to their short-term nature. The carrying amounts reported in the condensed balance sheet for cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses and due to related parties, each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the presented periods, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value:

Over-allotment Option

The over-allotment option granted to the underwriter was deemed to be a freestanding financial instrument indexed to the contingently redeemable shares and was accounted for as a liability pursuant to ASC Topic 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”). Upon the closing of the IPO on May 30, 2025, the over-allotment option was granted and represented the option to purchase up to 155,000 Units at $10.00 per Unit, which would expire on July 13, 2025. The Company used Binomial option pricing model in the determination of the fair value of the over-allotment liability. Key inputs used in the model are set forth as below:

On May 30, 2025 and June 30, 2025, the fair value of the over-allotment liability were $39,900 and $47,200, respectively, and loss from change in fair value of over-allotment liability of $7,300 was recorded for the six and three months ended June 30, 2025.

Earnings (Loss) Per Ordinary Share

The Company complies with accounting and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share”. The unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income include a presentation of earnings (loss) per redeemable share and earnings (loss) per non-redeemable share following the two-class method of income per share. In order to determine the income (loss) attributable to both the redeemable shares and non-redeemable shares, the Company first considered the undistributed income (loss) allocable to both the redeemable shares and non-redeemable shares and the undistributed income (loss) is calculated using the total income (loss) less any dividends paid. The Company then allocated the undistributed income (loss) ratably based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding between the redeemable and non-redeemable shares. Any remeasurement of the accretion to redemption value of the shares subject to possible redemption was considered to be dividends paid to the public shareholders.

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to redeemable/non-redeemable shareholders by the weighted-average number of redeemable/non-redeemable shares outstanding for the period. Net income available to redeemable/non-redeemable shareholders represents net income of the Company reduced by an allocation of earnings to participating securities. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. Share-based payment awards that do not contain such rights are not deemed participating securities and are included in diluted shares outstanding (if dilutive).

Diluted EPS is calculated under the treasury stock method and the two-class method. The calculation that results in the lowest diluted EPS amount for the redeemable/non-redeemable shares is reported in the Company’s condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income. The treasury stock method includes the dilutive effect of potential redeemable/non-redeemable shares including unvested stock-based awards. Potential redeemable shares associated with the over-allotment options are computed under the if-converted method. For the six and three months ended June 30, 2025, the effect of diluted securities was 12,163.

Net income (loss) used in the calculation of basic EPS is based on the following:

Basic EPS per share presented in the unaudited condensed statement of operations and comprehensive income is based on the following:

Net income (loss) used in the calculation of diluted EPS is based on the following:

Diluted EPS per share presented in the unaudited condensed statement of operations and comprehensive income is based on the following:

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. The amendments in this ASU require disclosures, on an annual and interim basis, of significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), as well as the aggregate amount of other segment items included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The ASU requires that a public entity disclose the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measure(s) of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. Public entities will be required to provide all annual disclosures currently required by Topic 280 in interim periods, and entities with a single reportable segment are required to provide all the disclosures required by the amendments in this ASU and existing segment disclosures in Topic 280. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 since inception.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (ASU 2023-09), which requires disclosure of incremental income tax information within the rate reconciliation and expanded disclosures of income taxes paid, among other disclosure requirements. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The Company’s management does not believe the adoption of ASU 2023-09 will have a material impact on its financial statements and disclosures.

In November 2024, FASB issued ASU 2024-03 Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”). Under ASU 2024-03, a public entity would be required to disclose information about purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and depletion for each income statement line item that contains those expenses. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. ASU 2024-03 allows for early adoption and requires either prospective adoption to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date of ASU 2024-03 or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company’s management does not believe the adoption of ASU 2024-03 will have a material impact on its financial statements and disclosures.

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.