As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2025

Registration No. 333-                 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM F-1 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

RAYTECH HOLDING LIMITED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Unit 609, 6/F, Nan Fung Commercial Centre,

No. 19 Lam Lok Street, Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong

Tel: +852 2117 0236

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Puglisi & Associates

850 Library Ave., Suite 204

Newark, Delaware 19711

Telephone: (302) 738-6680

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

With a Copy to:

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: Promptly after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: ☐

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.

Emerging growth company ☒

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act ☐

The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to such Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell the securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting any offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where such offer or sale is not permitted.

30,000,000 Ordinary Shares 

RAYTECH HOLDING LIMITED  

We are offering on a best efforts basis up 30,000,000 ordinary shares of Raytech Holding Limited (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”, “Raytech Holding”, “we”, “us” or “our”), par value $0.00000625 per share (“Ordinary Shares”), at a price of $[●] per share.

Our Ordinary Shares are listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “RAY”. The last reported sale price of our Ordinary Shares on The Nasdaq Capital Market on June 5, 2025 was $1.16 per Ordinary Share.

Investing in Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares involves a high degree of risk, including the risk of losing your entire investment. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 26 of this Registration Statement on Form F-1 (this “Registration Statement”) of which this prospectus forms a part for a discussion of factors you should consider in connection with an investment in our securities.

Upon the completion of this offering, Raytech Holding will have 47,613,083 Ordinary Shares issued and outstanding. Each Ordinary Share is entitled to one vote. Raytech Holding’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Mr. Ching Tim Hoi, beneficially owns 12,800,000 Ordinary Shares, representing 26.9% of the total voting power of Raytech Holding’s issued and outstanding share capital immediately following the completing of this offering. Because no individual, group or another company will own more than 50% of the total voting power for the election of directors, upon the completion of this offering, Raytech Holding will not be a “controlled company” as defined under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. Prior to this offering, Raytech Holding qualified as a “controlled company.” Notwithstanding its eligibility for certain exemptions from Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements available to controlled companies during that period, Raytech Holding voluntarily chose to comply with, and historically has complied with, such Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, including those pertaining to a majority independent board and independent board committees. As Raytech Holding will no longer be eligible for the exemptions available to a “controlled company” under the Nasdaq listing rules following this offering, Raytech Holding will continue to be subject to these full corporate governance requirements as mandated by these Nasdaq corporate governance standards.

Raytech Holding is a holding company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”). As a holding company with no material operations of its own, Raytech Holding’s operations are conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pure Beauty Manufacturing Company Limited (“Pure Beauty”), which is headquartered in Hong Kong, a special administrative region of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”). On May 6, 2025, Raytech Holding established another wholly-owned subsidiary, Raytech Innovation Limited (“Raytech Innovation”), also incorporated in Hong Kong; as of the date of this prospectus, Raytech Innovation has not commenced operations and has no assets. This is an offering of the Ordinary Shares of Raytech Holding, the holding company incorporated in BVI, instead of shares of its operating entities in Hong Kong, Pure Beauty or Raytech Innovation. You may never directly hold any equity interest in Raytech Holding’s operating entities.

We are not based in mainland China and do not have operations or generate revenue in mainland China, except that the manufacturers that manufacture our products are located in mainland China. We currently do not have or intend to set up any subsidiary in mainland China, and do not foresee the need to enter into any contractual arrangements with a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to establish a VIE structure in mainland China. For the six months ended September 30, 2024 and the fiscal years ended March 31, 2024, and 2023, we generated all our revenues from Hong Kong through Pure Beauty. Pursuant to the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the “Basic Law”), which is a national law of the PRC and the constitutional document for Hong Kong, national laws of the PRC shall not be applied in Hong Kong except for those listed in Annex III of the Basic Law and applied locally by promulgation or local legislation. The Basic Law expressly provides that the national laws of the PRC which may be listed in Annex III of the Basic Law shall be confined to those relating to defense and foreign affairs as well as other matters outside the autonomy of Hong Kong. The basic policies of the PRC regarding Hong Kong as a special administrative region of the PRC are reflected in the Basic Law, providing Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy and executive, legislative and independent judicial powers, including that of final adjudication under the principle of “one country, two systems”.

However, in light of the PRC government’s recent expansion of authority in Hong Kong, we may be subject to uncertainty about any future actions of the PRC government or authorities in Hong Kong, and it is possible that all the legal and operational risks associated with being based in and having operations in mainland China may also apply to operations in Hong Kong in the future. There is no assurance that there will not be any changes in the economic, political and legal environment in Hong Kong. The PRC government may intervene or influence our current and future operations in Hong Kong at any time, or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in issuers like Raytech Holding. Such governmental actions, if and when they occur: (i) could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue our operations; (ii) could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to investors; and (iii) may cause the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or become worthless.

We are also aware that recently, the government of mainland China initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in certain areas in mainland China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over mainland Chinese companies listed overseas using a VIE structure, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding the efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. Since these statements and regulatory actions are new, it is highly uncertain how soon the legislative or administrative regulation making bodies will respond and what existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations will be modified or promulgated, if any. In addition, due to long arm provisions under the current laws and regulations of mainland China, there remains regulatory uncertainty with respect to whether in the future we will be required to obtain permissions or approvals from the authorities of mainland China to operate our business or to list Raytech Holding’s securities on the U.S. exchanges and offer securities.

As advised by Raytech Holding’s legal counsel in mainland China (“PRC Counsel”), AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), as of the date of this prospectus, on the basis that (i) we currently do not have or intend to set up any subsidiary or VIE structure in mainland China, (ii) we do not have any business operations in mainland China, except that we collaborate with manufacturers located in mainland China to manufacture our products, (iii) none of our clients are located in mainland China, and (iv) we possess personal information of less than 1 million individuals in the PRC (for the purpose of this subsection (iv) only, including the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau and Taiwan), and do not possess any core data or important data of the PRC or any information which affects or may affect national security of the PRC, we believe, we are currently not required to obtain any permission or approval from the Cyberspace Administration of China (the “CAC”) or any other governmental authorities of mainland China to operate our business or offer subsequent securities of the company, nor have we been denied of any permissions or approvals from the authorities of mainland China.

According to the Trial Administrative Measures of the Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, promulgated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) on February 17, 2023 and became effective on March 31, 2023, a domestic company in the PRC that seeks to offer and list securities on overseas markets shall fulfill the filing procedures with the CSRC as per requirement of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures. This includes subsequent securities offerings of the company in the same overseas market where it has previously offered and listed securities, which requires a company to file with the CSRC within three working days after the subsequent securities offering is completed. Article 15 of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures provides that if the issuer both meets the following criteria, the overseas securities offering and listing conducted by such issuer will be deemed as indirect overseas offering by a mainland China company and such issuer shall fulfill the CSRC filing procedure: (i) 50% or more of any of the issuer’s operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in its audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year is accounted for by mainland China companies; and (ii) the main parts of the issuer’s business activities are conducted in mainland China, or its main place(s) of business are located in mainland China, or the majority of senior management staff in charge of its business operations and management are PRC citizens or have their usual place(s) of residence located in mainland China. As advised by Raytech Holding’s PRC Counsel, AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), based on the facts that (i) we do not operate any entities in mainland China and the operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in Raytech Holding’s audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year is accounted for by our Hong Kong subsidiaries, Pure Beauty located outside mainland China;

(ii) we do not have any equity interest in any manufacturer located in mainland China and vice versa; and (iii) we conduct a majority of our business and are headquartered in Hong Kong rather than in mainland China, and our senior management team are not PRC citizens or have their residence located outside mainland China, we believe that this offering will not be regarded as a subsequent securities offering in the same overseas market under the Article 15 of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, and are not required to fulfill the filing procedures with the CSRC to issue securities to foreign investors. However, as the Overseas Listing Trial Measures were newly published, there are substantial uncertainties that the CSRC may take a view that is contrary to our understanding of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures because the Overseas Listing Trial Measures adopts the principle of “substance over form” regarding the determination of “indirect overseas offering and listing by a domestic company,” over which the CSRC may have substantial discretions.

Based on the foregoing, we do not currently expect the laws and regulations of mainland China to have any material impact on our business, financial conditions or results of operations and we are currently not subject to the government of mainland China’s direct influence or discretion over the manner in which we conduct our business activities outside of mainland China. Furthermore, CLKW Lawyers LLP, Raytech Holding’s Hong Kong counsel, has advised Raytech Holding that, as of the date of this prospectus, Raytech Holding is not required to obtain any permission or approval from the governmental authorities of Hong Kong to list on the U.S. exchanges and offer securities and we have obtained all necessary licenses, permissions or approvals including the business registration certificate from the governmental authorities of Hong Kong to operate our business through Pure Beauty and to the best of our knowledge, no license, permission or approval has been denied.

Nevertheless, if we (i) do not receive or maintain such permissions or approvals, should such permissions or approvals be required in the future by the government of mainland China or Hong Kong, (ii) inadvertently conclude that such permissions or approvals are not required, or (iii) applicable laws, regulations, or interpretations change and we are required to obtain such permissions or approvals in the future, we may be unable to obtain such permissions or approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC, the CAC or other PRC or Hong Kong regulatory authorities if we fail to fully comply with any new regulatory requirements. Consequently, our operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected, and Raytech Holding’s ability to offer securities to investors could be significantly limited or completely hindered and the securities currently being offered may substantially decline in value and become worthless. If there is significant change to current political arrangements between mainland China and Hong Kong, the PRC government intervenes or influences operations of companies operated in Hong Kong like us, or exerts more control through change of laws and regulations over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in issuers like us, it may result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of the securities we are registering for sale or could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of our Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or become worthless. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure” beginning on page 37 and “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in Hong Kong” beginning on page 40 of this prospectus for more information.

In addition, Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares may be prohibited from trading on a national exchange or over-the-counter market under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (the “HFCA Act”) if the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”) is unable to inspect Raytech Holding’s auditors for three consecutive years. Furthermore, on June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (the “AHFCAA”), which would amend the HFCA Act and require the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges if its auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three consecutive years. Pursuant to the HFCA Act, the PCAOB issued a Determination Report on December 16, 2021 (the “Determination Report”) which found that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in: (i) mainland China of the PRC, and (ii) Hong Kong; and such report identified the specific registered public accounting firms which are subject to these determinations. On August 26, 2022, a Statement of Protocol was signed by the PCAOB, the CSRC and the Ministry of Finance of the PRC governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in mainland China and Hong Kong (the “Statement of Protocol”). Pursuant to the Statement of Protocol, the PCAOB conducted inspections on select registered public accounting firms subject to the Determination Report in Hong Kong between September and November 2022. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB board announced that it has completed the inspections, determined that it had complete access to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, and voted to vacate the Determination Report. On December 29, 2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (the “CAA”) was signed into law by President Biden. The CAA contained, among other things, an identical provision to the AHFCAA, which reduces the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCA Act from three years to two. Raytech Holding’s auditor, WWC, P.C., is headquartered in San Mateo, California, and has been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis. Raytech Holding’s auditor is not headquartered in mainland China or Hong Kong and was not identified in the Determination Report as a firm subject to the PCAOB’s determinations. Raytech Holding’s auditor is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess Raytech Holding’s auditor’s compliance with the applicable professional standards with the last inspection in December 2021. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that, in the future, the PCAOB determines that it is not able to fully conduct inspections of Raytech Holding’s auditor for three consecutive years beginning in 2022, or the PCAOB re-evaluates its determination as a result of any obstruction with the implementation of the Statement of Protocol in the future, trading of its securities on a national securities exchange or in the over-the counter market may be prohibited under the HFCA Act and Raytech Holding’s access to the U.S. capital markets may be limited or restricted. The delisting of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment. See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares and This Offering - Although the audit report included in this prospectus is prepared by U.S. auditors who are currently inspected by the PCAOB, there is no guarantee that future audit reports will be prepared by auditors inspected by the PCAOB and, as such, in the future investors may be deprived of the benefits of such inspection. Furthermore, trading in Raytech Holding’s securities may be prohibited under the HFCA Act if the SEC subsequently determines Raytech Holding’s audit work is performed by auditors that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely, and as a result, U.S. national securities exchanges, such as the Nasdaq, may determine to delist Raytech Holding’s securities. Furthermore, on June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the AHFCAA, which would amend the HFCA Act and require the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges if its auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three, thus reducing the time period for triggering the prohibition on trading.” on page 50 and “The recent joint statement by the SEC, proposed rule changes submitted by Nasdaq, and an act passed by the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, all call for additional and more stringent criteria to be applied to emerging market companies. These developments could add uncertainties to Raytech Holding’s offering, share price and our business operations and reputation.” on page 50 of this prospectus for more information. 

Save for a BVI business company meeting the solvency test set out in section 56 of the BVI Act, Raytech Holding is permitted under the laws of BVI to provide funding to its subsidiary Pure Beauty through loans or capital contributions without restrictions on the amount of the funds. Save for a BVI business company meeting the solvency test set out in section 56 of the BVI Act, there are no restrictions or limitation under the laws of BVI on Raytech Holding’s ability to distribute earnings from its businesses, including subsidiary, to the U.S. investors. Pure Beauty is permitted under the laws of Hong Kong to provide funding to Raytech Holding through dividend distribution out of profits available for distribution without restrictions on the amount of the funds. Raytech Innovation, once operational and profitable, would also be permitted under the laws of Hong Kong to provide funding to Raytech Holding through dividend distribution out of profits available for distribution. Both Raytech Holding and its subsidiaries currently intend to retain all available funds and future earnings, if any, for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Neither Raytech Holding nor its subsidiaries have any dividend payout policy, and each entity needs to comply with applicable law or regulations with respect to transfer of funds, dividends and distributions with other entities. Any future determination related to Raytech Holding’s dividend policy will be made at the discretion of Raytech Holding’s board of directors after considering our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual requirements, business prospects and other factors the board of directors deems relevant, and subject to the restrictions contained in any future financing instruments. If Raytech Holding determines to pay dividends on any of its Ordinary Shares in the future, as a holding company, Raytech Holding will be dependent on receipt of funds from its subsidiaries. Under the current practice of the Inland Revenue Department of Hong Kong, no tax is payable in Hong Kong in respect of dividends paid by Raytech Holding’s Hong Kong subsidiary, Pure Beauty. There are no restrictions or limitation under the laws of Hong Kong imposed on the conversion of HKD into foreign currencies and the remittance of currencies out of Hong Kong. See “Dividend Policy” on page 59 and “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure – Raytech Holding may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by its subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements it may have, and any limitation on the ability of its subsidiaries to make payments to it could have a material adverse effect on Raytech Holding’s ability to conduct its business.” on page 37 of this prospectus for more information.

Raytech Holding is an “emerging growth company” as defined under the federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. See “Risk Factors” and “Prospectus Summary— Implications of Raytech Holding’s Being an Emerging Growth Company” on pages 26 and 20, respectively.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

We have engaged the placement agent to use its reasonable best efforts to solicit offers to purchase our securities in this offering. The placement agent has no obligation to purchase any of the ordinary shares from us or to arrange for the purchase or sale of any specific number or dollar amount of the ordinary shares. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to closing in this offering, the actual public offering amount, placement agent’s fee and proceeds to us, if any, are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the total maximum offering amounts set forth above and throughout this prospectus. We have agreed to pay the placement agent the placement agents fees set forth in the table below. See “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 124 of this prospectus for more information.

Raytech Holding may amend or supplement this prospectus from time to time by filing amendments or supplements as required. You should read this entire prospectus and any amendments or supplements carefully before you make your investment decision.

Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed on the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Placement Agent

R. F. Lafferty & Co., Inc.

Prospectus dated June 6, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Raytech Holding and the placement agent have not authorized any person to give you any supplemental information or to make any representations for Raytech Holding. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement are accurate as of any date other than their respective dates, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the shares. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the Ordinary Shares offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. Raytech Holding is not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted or where the person making the offer or sale is not qualified to do so or to any person to whom it is not permitted to make such offer or sale. The information in this prospectus is not complete and is subject to change. No person should rely on the information contained in this document for any purpose other than participating in Raytech Holding’s proposed offering, and only prospectus dated hereof, is authorized by Raytech Holding to be used in connection with our proposed offering. The preliminary prospectus will only be distributed by Raytech Holding and no other person has been authorized by Raytech Holding to use this document to offer or sell any of Raytech Holding’s securities.

Until [●] (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as placement agent and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

COMMONLY USED DEFINED TERMS

Unless otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise, references in this prospectus to:

Raytech Holding does not have any material operations of its own and Raytech Holding is a holding company with operations conducted in Hong Kong through its Hong Kong subsidiary Pure Beauty, using Hong Kong dollars, the currency of Hong Kong. Raytech Holding’s reporting currency is Hong Kong dollars. This prospectus contains translations of certain foreign currency amounts into U.S. dollars for the convenience of the reader.

Translations of amounts in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated balance sheet, unaudited interim condensed consolidated statements of income and unaudited interim condensed consolidated statements of cash flows from HKD into US$ as of and for the six months ended September 30, 2024 are solely for the convenience of the reader and were calculated at the noon buying rate of US$1 = HKD7.7693, as published in H.10 statistical release of the United States Federal Reserve Board.

Translations of amounts in the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of income and consolidated statements of cash flows from HKD into US$ as of and for the year ended March 31, 2023 are solely for the convenience of the reader and were calculated at the noon buying rate of US$1 = HKD7.8499, as published in H.10 statistical release of the United States Federal Reserve Board.

Translations of amounts in the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of income and consolidated statements of cash flows from HKD into US$ as of and for the year ended March 31, 2024 are solely for the convenience of the reader and were calculated at the noon buying rate of US$1 = HKD7.8259, as published in H.10 statistical release of the United States Federal Reserve Board.

No representation is made that the HKD amounts could have been, or could be, converted, realized or settled into US$ at such rate, or at any other rate.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares involves a high degree of risk. Before deciding whether to invest in Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares, you should consider carefully the risks described below, together with all of the other information set forth in this prospectus, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow could be materially and adversely affected, which could cause the trading price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to decline, resulting in a loss of all or part of your investment. The risks described below are not the only ones that we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. You should only consider investing in Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares if you can bear the risk of loss of your entire investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

Changes in capital markets, merger and acquisition activity, legal or regulatory requirements, general economic conditions and monetary or geopolitical disruptions, as well as other factors beyond our control, could reduce demand for our products, in which case our revenues and profitability could decline.

Different factors outside of our control could affect demand for our products. These include:

We are not able to predict the positive or negative effects that future events or changes to global economies will have on our business. Fluctuations, changes and disruptions in financial, credit, merger and acquisition and other markets, political instability and general business factors could impact various segments’ operations and could affect such operations differently. Changes to factors described above, as well as other events, including by way of example, contractions of regional economies, or the economy of a particular country, trade restrictions, monetary systems, banking, real estate and retail or other industries; debt or credit difficulties or defaults by businesses or countries; new, repeals of or changes to laws and regulations, including changes to the bankruptcy and competition laws of the U.S. or other countries; tort reform; banking reform; a decline in the implementation or adoption of new laws or regulation, or in government enforcement, litigation or monetary damages or remedies that are sought; or political instability may have adverse effects on our business.

Our revenues, operating income and cash flows are likely to fluctuate.

We experience fluctuations in our revenues and cost structure and the resulting operating income and cash flows and expect that this will continue to occur in the future. We may experience fluctuations in our annual and quarterly financial results, including revenues, operating income and earnings per share, for reasons that may include: (i) the types and complexity, number, size, timing and duration of customer engagements; (ii) the timing of revenue recognition under U.S. GAAP; (iii) the utilization of revenue-generating professionals, including the ability to adjust staffing levels up or down to accommodate the business and prospects of the applicable segment and practice; (iv) the geographic locations of our customers or the locations where services are rendered; (v) billing rates and fee arrangements, including the opportunity and ability to successfully reach milestones and complete, and collect success fees and other outcome-contingent or performance-based fees; (vi) the length of billing and collection cycles and changes in amounts that may become uncollectible; (vii) changes in the frequency and complexity of government regulatory and enforcement activities; (viii) business and asset acquisitions; (ix) fluctuations in the exchange rates of various currencies against the U.S. dollar; (x) fee adjustments upon the renewal of expired service contracts or acceptance of new customers due to the adjusted scope per our refined business strategy; and (xi) economic factors beyond our control.

The results of our business operation may be affected differently by the above factors. The positive effects of certain events or factors on our business may not be sufficient to overcome the negative effects of those same events or factors on other parts of our business.

Our results are subject to seasonal and other similar factors. While we assess our annual guidance at the end of each quarter and update such guidance when we think it is appropriate, unanticipated future volatility can cause actual results to vary significantly from our guidance, even where that guidance reflects a range of possible results and has been updated to take account of partial-year results.

We have a substantial customer concentration, with a limited number of customers accounting for a substantial portion of our revenues. 

We engaged in developing, manufacturing and selling products relating to home electric appliances. We derive a significant portion of our revenues from a few major customers. We currently have two major customers: (i) Koizumi Seiki Corp., a Japanese company, having been doing business for over 300 years since 1716, which is one of the leading corporations specialized in small appliance market in Japan; the current contract we have with Koizumi Seiki Corp. was executed on July 1, 2014, automatically renewable on annual basis unless otherwise terminated by either party with a notice given at least six months prior to the expiration of then existing term of the contract; (ii) another customer, a U.S. home appliance manufacturer; and (iii) a global distributor of various consumer products.

For the year ended March 31, 2023, sales to Koizumi Seiki Corp. represented 91.3% of our revenue. For the year ended March 31, 2024, sales to Koizumi Seiki Corp. represented 74.1% of our revenue and another customer represented 16.5% of our revenue. For the six months ended September 30, 2023, we generated 81% and 17% of our total revenue from Koizumi Seiki Corp. and another customer, who is a global distributor of various consumer products, respectively. For the six months ended September 30, 2024, we generated 57.8% and 33.7% of our total revenue from Koizumi Seiki Corp. and another customer, respectively.

Inherent risks exist whenever a large percentage of total revenues are concentrated with a limited number of customers. It is not possible for us to predict the future level of demand for the products of these customers in the marketplace or the future demand for our products and services by these customers. If any of these customers experience declining or delayed sales due to market, economic or competitive conditions, we could be pressured to reduce our prices or they could decrease the purchase quantity of our products, which could have an adverse effect on our margins and financial position, and could negatively affect our revenues and results of operations. If any of our major largest customers stop coming to us for customized products, such suspension would materially negatively affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on a limited number of manufactures, some of which we are affiliated with. A loss of any of these manufactures could significantly negatively affect our business.

We rely on a limited number of manufacturers who are responsible for manufacturing hair care and skincare products. For the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2024, and for the six months ended September 30, 2023 and 2024, we relied on two major manufacturers, (i) Zhongshan Raytech Electrical Appliances Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (“Zhongshan Raytech”), a factory located in Zhongshan, China, and is owned by Mr. Ching Tim Hoi, who is also our CEO, Chairman and controlling shareholder, and (ii) Zhongshan Leimi Electrical Appliances Company Limited (“Zhongshan Leimi”), a factory located in Zhongshan, China. The current contracts we have with Zhongshan Raytech and Zhongshan Leimi were executed on January 1, 2021 and are automatically renewable on an annual basis unless otherwise terminated by either party with a notice given at least six months prior to the expiration of the then-existing term of the contract. Pursuant to each contract with Zhongshan Raytech and Zhongshan Leimi, we place orders with the manufacturer based on orders from our customers and the manufacturer is responsible to manufacture the products according to the requirements of each order.

For the year ended March 31, 2023, payments to each of Zhongshan Raytech and Zhongshan Leimi accounted for 83.1% and 10.4%, respectively, of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the year ended March 31, 2024, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 88.5% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the six months ended September 30, 2023, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 92.7% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the six months ended September 30, 2024, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 91.5% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company.

We do not currently have other reliable alternatives or replacements for these manufacturers. This reliance on a limited number of manufactures increases our risks. If we experience a significant increase in demand of our products, or if we need to replace an existing manufacturer, we may not be able to supplement service or replace them on acceptable terms, which may undermine our ability to deliver products to our customers in a timely manner. Identifying and approving suitable manufacturers could be an extensive process that requires us to become satisfied with their quality control, technical capabilities, responsiveness and service, financial stability, regulatory compliance, and labor and other ethical practices. Accordingly, a loss of any significant manufacturer would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our manufacturers may face supply chain risks and constraints of their own, which may impact the availability and pricing of our products and delay for the deliveries of our products.

Our major manufacturers are located in mainland China which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on two major manufacturers, Zhongshan Raytech and Zhongshan Leimi, which are located in Zhongshan, mainland China. For the year ended March 31, 2024, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 88.5% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the year ended March 31, 2023, payments to each of Zhongshan Raytech and Zhongshan Leimi accounted for 83.1% and 10.4%, respectively, of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the six months ended September 30, 2024, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 91.5% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the six months ended September 30, 2023, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 92.7% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. Our significant dependence on these manufacturers, concentrated geographically in mainland China, exposes us to various risks. We depend on our ability to provide our customers with a wide range of products from our major manufacturers in a timely and efficient manner. Political and economic instability in the region, global or regional adverse conditions, such as pandemics or other disease outbreaks or natural disasters, the financial stability of our manufacturers, our manufacturers’ ability to meet our standards, labor problems experienced by such manufacturers, the availability or cost of raw materials, merchandise quality issues, currency exchange rates, trade tariff developments, transport availability and cost, including import-related taxes, transport security, inflation, and other factors relating to manufacturing in mainland China are largely beyond our control. As an example, the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely impact such manufacturers facilities and operations due to extended holidays, factory closures and risks of labor shortages, among other things, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. As at the date of this prospectus, our two major manufacturers, Zhongshan Raytech and Zhongshan Leimi, have not experienced material impacts imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Furthermore, we are unable to predict whether our manufacturers in the future will be subject to new, different, or additional trade restrictions imposed by the PRC or foreign governments or the likelihood, type or effect of any such restrictions. Any event causing a disruption or delay of imports from manufacturers based in mainland China, including the imposition of additional export restrictions, restrictions on the transfer of funds or increased tariffs or quotas, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of products available to our customers and materially adversely affect our financial performance as well as our reputation. Furthermore, our manufacturers operations may be adversely affected by political and financial instability, resulting in the disruption of trade from exporting countries and regions, restrictions on the transfer of funds or other trade disruptions.

We also are unable to predict whether our manufacturers in the future will be subject to new, different, or additional trade restrictions imposed by the PRC or foreign governments or the likelihood, type or effect of any such restrictions. Any event causing a disruption or delay of imports from manufacturers, including the imposition of additional export restrictions, restrictions on the transfer of funds or increased tariffs or quotas, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of products available to our customers and materially adversely affect our financial performance as well as our reputation. Furthermore, our manufacturers operations may be adversely affected by political and financial instability, resulting in the disruption of trade from exporting countries and regions, restrictions on the transfer of funds or other trade disruptions.

Additionally, the economy of mainland China differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the extent of government involvement, its level of development, its growth rate and its control over foreign exchange. In recent years, the government of mainland China has implemented measures emphasizing market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of sound corporate governance in business enterprises. However, a significant portion of productive assets in mainland China is still owned by the government of mainland China. The government of mainland China continues to play a significant role in regulating industrial development. It also exercises significant control over mainland China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policies, restricting the inflow and outflow of foreign capital and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. The government of China also has significant authority to exert influence on the ability of a China-based company, such as our manufacturers, to conduct their business. Any adverse change in the economic conditions in mainland China, policies of the government or laws and regulations in mainland China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China and, in turn, on the business of our major manufacturers in mainland China. As a result, we may lose our major manufacturers in mainland China, and we may not have other reliable alternatives or replacements for these manufacturers. A loss of our major manufacturers in mainland China would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and may cause Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to significantly decline in value.

Inadequate or inaccurate external and internal information, including budget and planning data, could lead to inaccurate financial forecasts and inappropriate financial decisions.

Our financial forecasts are dependent on estimates and assumptions regarding budget and planning data, market growth, foreign exchange rates and our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to reinvest in the business, fund internal growth, and meet our debt obligations. Our financial projections are based on historical financial data and seasonal effect and on various other assumptions and foreseeable market trend that our management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances and at the time they are made. However, if our external and internal information is inadequate, our actual results may differ materially from our forecasts and cause us to make inappropriate financial decisions. Any material variation between our financial forecasts and our actual results may also adversely affect our future profitability, stock price and shareholder confidence. 

We may not manage our growth effectively, and our profitability may suffer.

We experience fluctuations in growth rates and across our different product segments, including periods of rapid or declining growth. While we have experienced expansion overall in the past 10 years, this growth has not always been uniform across segments or consistent year-over-year. However, to manage growth successfully, we may need to add qualified managers and employees and periodically update our operating, financial and other systems, as well as our internal procedures and controls. We also must effectively motivate, train and manage our research and development staff. If we fail to add or retain qualified managers, employees and contractors when needed, estimate costs, or manage our growth effectively, our business, financial results and financial condition may suffer.

We cannot assure that we can successfully manage growth and maintain profitability as we grow. In periods of declining growth, underutilized employees and contractors may result in expenses and costs representing a greater percentage of revenues. In such situations, we will have to weigh the benefits of decreasing our workforce or limiting our service offerings and saving costs against the detriment that we could experience from losing valued professionals and their industry expertise and customers.

Our reputation is crucial to our business. Any harm to our reputation or failure to enhance our brand recognition may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our reputation, which depends on earning and maintaining the trust and confidence of our current or potential customers, is critical to our business. Our reputation is vulnerable to many threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or impossible to remediate. Regulatory inquiries or investigations, lawsuits initiated by customers or other third parties, employee misconduct, perceptions of conflicts of interest and rumors, among other things, could substantially damage our reputation, even if they are baseless or satisfactorily addressed. Moreover, any negative media publicity about our industry in general or product or service quality problems of other firms in the industry, including our competitors, may also negatively impact our reputation and brand. If we are unable to maintain a good reputation or further enhance our brand recognition, our ability to attract and retain customers and key employees could be harmed and, as a result, our business and revenues would be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be able to continue to grow at our historical rate of growth, and if we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We anticipate continued growth in the foreseeable future. However, past results of operations achieved by us should not be taken as indicative of our future prospects and results of operations, and we cannot assure you that we will grow at the historical rate of growth, or at all. Our rapid growth has placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our management, personnel, systems and resources. To accommodate our growth, we will need to implement a variety of new and upgraded operational and systems procedures and controls, including the improvement of our accounting and other internal management systems. We also will need to recruit, train, manage and motivate employees and manage our relationships with an increasing number of customers. Moreover, as we introduce new products or enter into new markets, we may face unfamiliar market and operational risks and challenges which we may fail to successfully address. We may be unable to manage our growth effectively, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

As a result, you should consider our future prospects in light of the risks and uncertainties experienced by early stage companies in a rapidly evolving and increasingly competitive market.

If we fail to prevent security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of our data or user data, or other hacking and attacks, we may lose users, and our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We have privacy and data security policies in place that are designed to prevent security breaches and we are looking for resources to assist us to develop our security measures against breaches. Although we have not experienced any security breaches or cybersecurity issues, however, as newer technologies evolve, and the portfolio of the service providers with which the Company shares confidential information with grows, we could be exposed to increased risk of breaches in security and other illegal or fraudulent acts, including cyberattacks. The evolving nature of such threats, in light of new and sophisticated methods used by criminals and cyberterrorists, including computer viruses, malware, phishing, misrepresentation, social engineering and forgery, is making it increasingly challenging to anticipate and adequately mitigate these risks.

We are likely in the future to be subject to these types of attacks. If we are unable to avert these attacks and security breaches, we could be subject to significant legal and financial liabilities, our reputation would be harmed and we could sustain substantial revenue loss from lost sales and customer dissatisfaction. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks. Cyber-attacks may target us, our manufacturers, customers or other participants, or the internet infrastructure on which we depend. Actual or anticipated attacks and risks may cause us to incur significantly higher costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and network protection technologies, train employees, and engage third-party experts and consultants. As we do not carry cybersecurity insurance, we will not be able to mitigate such risks to any third party. Cybersecurity breaches would not only harm our reputation and business, but also could materially decrease our revenue and net income.

We cannot assure you that we could retain effective intellectual property rights.

We cannot make assurances that the steps we have taken or will take in the future to protect our intellectual property rights are or will be adequate to deter misappropriation of proprietary information or that we will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. As at the date of this prospectus, neither we nor Pure Beauty own any registered trademarks in any jurisdiction. We intend to register Pure Beauty’s trademarks in Hong Kong to secure trademark protection after seeking professional advice. However, whilst registration will usually confirm ownership and subsistence of rights, some registrations can still be challenged due to prior existing rights. We cannot assure you that in the future our intellectual property rights registrations will be complete or invulnerable.

We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which may be expensive to defend and may disrupt our business and operations.

We cannot be certain that our operations or any aspects of our business do not or will not infringe upon or otherwise violate trademarks, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights held by third parties. We may be from time to time in the future subject to legal proceedings and claims relating to the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, there may be third-party trademarks, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights that are infringed by our products, services or other aspects of our business without our awareness. Holders of such intellectual property rights may seek to enforce such rights against us in Hong Kong, the United States or other jurisdictions. If any third-party infringement claims are brought against us, we may be forced to divert some resources from our business and operations to defend against these claims, regardless of their merits.

Additionally, the application and interpretation of Hong Kong’s intellectual property rights laws and the procedures and standards for granting trademarks, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights in Hong Kong are still evolving and are uncertain, and we cannot ensure that Hong Kong courts or regulatory authorities would agree with our analysis. If we were found to be in violation of the intellectual property rights of others, we may be subject to liability for our infringement activities or may be prohibited from using such intellectual property, and we may incur licensing fees or be forced to develop alternatives of our own. As a result, our business and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.

As at the date of this prospectus, we have been using certain trademarks on Pure Beauty’s daily business operations which are currently registered in Japan and owned by Mr. Ching (the “Japan Pure Beauty Trademarks”). On August 1, 2021, a trademark license agreement was entered into between us and Mr. Ching (the “Japan Trademark License Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Ching agreed to irrevocably and unconditionally grant us, our subsidiaries and branches an exclusive license to use the Japan Pure Beauty Trademarks on a royalty-free basis, for 10 years commencing from the date of the Japan Trademark License Agreement. There is no guarantee that we will be able to successfully renew the Japan Trademark License Agreement upon expiration of its current term and that the same will not be revoked or early terminated by Mr. Ching. In the absence of a valid Japan Trademark License Agreement, the use of the Japan Pure Beauty Trademarks by us or Pure Beauty in Japan may subject us or Pure Beauty to trademark infringement claims, and we may be forced to divert some resources from our business and operations to defend against these claims, regardless of their merits. As a result, our business and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.

Compromise of confidential or proprietary information could damage our reputation, harm our businesses and adversely impact our financial results.

Our own confidential and proprietary information and that of our customers could be compromised, whether intentionally or unintentionally, by our employees, consultants or manufacturers. A compromise of the security of our information technology systems leading to theft or misuse of our own or our customers’ proprietary or confidential information, or the public disclosure or use of such information by others, could result in losses, third-party claims against us and reputational harm, including the loss of customers. The theft or compromise of our or our customers’ information could negatively impact our reputation, financial results and prospects. In addition, if our reputation is damaged due to a data security breach, our ability to attract new engagements and customers may be impaired or we may be subjected to damages or penalties, which could negatively impact our businesses, financial results or financial condition.

Increases in labor costs in Hong Kong may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The economy in Hong Kong has experienced increases in inflation and labor costs in recent years. As a result, average wages in Hong Kong are expected to continue to increase. In addition, we are required by Hong Kong laws and regulations to maintain various statutory employee benefits, including mandatory provident fund scheme and work-related injury insurance, to provide statutorily required paid sick leave, annual leave and maternity leave, and pay severance payments or long service payments. The relevant government agencies may examine whether an employer has complied with such requirements, and those employers who fail to comply commit a criminal offence and may be subject to fines and/or imprisonment. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will continue to increase. Unless we are able to control our labor costs or pass on these increased labor costs to our users by increasing the fees of our services, our financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

Raytech Holding’s principal shareholders have substantial influence over Raytech Holding and their interests may not be aligned with the interests of Raytech Holding’s other shareholders.

Mr. Ching Tim Hoi is currently the beneficial owner of 12,800,000 Ordinary Shares or 72.7% of Raytech Holding’s outstanding Ordinary Shares. Mr. Ching will own approximately 26.9% of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares following the offering. Mr. Ching will be able to exert significant voting influence over Raytech Holding’s business, including decisions regarding mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of Raytech Holding’s assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by Raytech Holding’s other shareholders, including our public shareholders. Moreover, this concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of Raytech Holding, which could deprive Raytech Holding’s shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of Raytech Holding and might reduce the price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares.

We face risks related to natural disasters, health epidemics and other outbreaks, which could significantly disrupt our operations.

We are vulnerable to natural disasters and other calamities. Fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, wars, riots, terrorist attacks or similar events may give rise to supply chain disruptions, shipment delays, manufacturing breakdowns, and demand shifts, which could cause adversely affect our ability to provide products and services to our customers. In addition, our results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent that any health epidemic harms the Hong Kong economy in general. A prolonged outbreak of any illnesses or other adverse public health developments in Hong Kong or elsewhere in the world could have a material adverse effect on our business operations. Such outbreaks could severely disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our headquarters are located in Hong Kong, where our management and employees currently reside. Consequently, if any natural disasters, health epidemics or other public safety concerns were to affect Hong Kong or cause travel restriction in or out of Hong Kong or its surrounding areas, our operation may experience material disruptions, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. On February 24, 2022, the Russian Federation launched an invasion of Ukraine that has had an immediate impact on the global economy resulting in higher energy prices and higher prices for certain raw materials and goods and services which in turn is contributing to higher inflation in the United States and other countries across the globe with significant disruption to financial markets. We do not have any operation or business in Russia or Ukraine, however, we may potentially be indirectly adversely impacted any significant disruption it has caused and may continue to escalate. Any one or more of these events may impede our operation and delivery efforts and adversely affect our sales results, or even for a prolonged period of time, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Failure to comply with laws and regulations applicable to our business could subject us to fines and penalties and could also cause us to lose customers or otherwise harm our business.

Our business is subject to regulation by various governmental agencies in Hong Kong, including agencies responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance with various legal obligations, such as intellectual property laws, employment and labor laws, workplace safety, governmental trade laws, import and export controls, anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, and tax laws and regulations. In certain jurisdictions, these regulatory requirements may be more stringent than in Hong Kong. These laws and regulations impose added costs on our business. Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could subject us to:

If any governmental sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a significant diversion of our management’s attention and resources and an increase in professional fees. Enforcement actions and sanctions could materially harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Any reviews by regulatory agencies or legislatures may result in substantial regulatory fines, changes to our business practices, and other penalties, which could negatively affect our business and results of operations. Changes in social, political, and regulatory conditions or in laws and policies governing a wide range of topics may cause us to change our business practices. Further, our expansion into a variety of new fields also could raise a number of new regulatory issues. These factors could negatively affect our business and results of operations in material ways.

Moreover, we are exposed to the risk of misconduct, errors and failure to functions by our management, employees and parties with whom we collaborate, who may from time to time be subject to litigation and regulatory investigations and proceedings or otherwise face potential liability and penalties in relation to noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations, which could harm our reputation and business.

Members of our management team may in the future be involved in governmental investigations and civil litigations relating to the business affairs of companies with which they are, were or may in the future be affiliated with.

Members of our management team may in the future be involved in governmental investigations and civil litigations relating to the business affairs of companies with which they are, were or may in the future be affiliated with. Any such investigations or litigations may divert our management team’s attention and resources away from managing our business affairs and operations, may be detrimental to our reputation, and thus may negatively affect our business and financial performance.

If Raytech Holding becomes directly subject to the recent scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity involving U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we may have to expend significant resources to investigate and resolve the matter, which could harm our business operations, stock price and reputation and could result in a loss of your investment in Raytech Holding’s stock, especially if such matter cannot be addressed and resolved favorably.

Recently, U.S. public companies that have substantially all of their operations in China, including Hong Kong, have been the subject of intense scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity by investors, financial commentators and regulatory agencies, such as the SEC. Much of the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity has centered around financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, a lack of effective internal controls over financial accounting, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result of the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity, the publicly traded stock of many U.S. listed Chinese companies has sharply decreased in value and, in some cases, has become virtually worthless. Many of these companies are now subject to shareholder lawsuits and SEC enforcement actions and are conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations. It is not clear what effect this sector-wide scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity will have on Raytech Holding, its business and its stock price. Although substantially all of our operations are based in Hong Kong and none of our customers are based in mainland China, if Raytech Holding becomes the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or untrue, we will have to expend significant resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend our company. This situation will be costly and time consuming and distract our management from growing our business.

If we fail to compete effectively, we may miss new business opportunities or lose existing customers, and our revenues and profitability may decline.

The market for some of our products is highly competitive. We do not compete against the same companies for all of our products and services or in all geographic regions. Instead, we compete with different companies or depending on the particular types of requested products and services and the location of the customer or delivery of the products and services. Our operations are highly competitive.

Our competitors include large organizations, such as the international personal care electronic design and development organizations, which offer niche products and services that are the same or similar to products or services offered by us; and small firms and independent contractors that focus on specialized products and services. Some of our competitors have significantly more financial resources, a larger national or international presence, larger professional staffs and greater brand recognition than we do. Some have lower overhead and other costs.

If we cannot compete effectively or if the costs of competing, including the costs of hiring and retaining professionals, become too expensive, our revenue growth and financial results could be negatively affected and may differ materially from our expectations.

If we are unable to rely on the services and connections of our key personnel, or retain the current key personnel, our business could be adversely affected.

Our growth has been heavily dependent on the services provided by our management team. They manage our business operation, develop and execute our business strategies and manage the relationship with our key product manufacturers and corporate customers. Therefore, our future success relies on our ability to retain the services of these key management personnel. If any of these key personnel are unable or unwilling to continue to provide services to us, and we are unable to find suitable replacements, we may not be able to continue our operations effectively and efficiently, and our business and financial conditions could be adversely affected.

Certain of our officers or directors may have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of their equity interests in or positions with Raytech Holdings Company Limited and Zhongshan Raytech.

Raytech Holding’s CEO and Chairman, Mr. Ching, and Raytech Holding’s director and the Assistant to CEO of Pure Beauty, Mr. Ling, currently serve as, and will continue to serve as (i) Executive Director and Supervisor respectively of one of our collaborating manufacturers, Zhongshan Raytech, and (ii) Director and Assistant to CEO respectively of Raytech Holdings Company Limited. Mr. Ching’s positions at and ownership of Zhongshan Raytech and Raytech Holdings Company Limited, and Mr. Ling’s positions at Zhongshan Raytech and Raytech Holdings Company Limited, on which we rely for manufacturing collaboration, create, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest when these officers or directors are faced with decisions that could have different implications for Zhongshan Raytech and Raytech Holdings Company Limited than for us. These potential conflicts could arise, for example, over matters such as the desirability of changes in our business and operations, funding and capital matters, regulatory matters, and contractual arrangements.

Our employees may leave to form or join competitors, and we may not have, or may choose not to pursue, legal recourse against such professionals.

Our employees typically have close relationships with the customers they serve, based on their expertise and bonds of personal trust and confidence. Therefore, the barriers to our employees pursuing independent business opportunities or joining our competitors should be considered low. Although our customers generally contract for services with us as a company, and not with an individual employee, in the event that an employee leaves, such customers may decide that they prefer to continue working with a specific person rather than with us. In the event an employee departs and acts in a way that we believe violates his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, we will consider any legal remedies we may have against such person on a case-by-case basis. We may decide that preserving cooperation and a professional relationship with a former employee or customer, or other concerns, outweighs the benefits of any possible legal recourse. We may also decide that the likelihood of success does not justify the costs of pursuing a legal remedy. Therefore, there may be times we may decide not to pursue legal action, even if it is available to us.

Our business and sales are subject to the business strategies of the brand owners.

For the years ended March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 and six months ended September 30, 2024 and, September 30, 2023, our revenue was attributed to sales of branded products sourced from brand owners by our customers in Japan, U.S., Europe and Australia. Our business and sales are heavily dependent on the market receptiveness of, and demand for, the products being provided by various brand owners. The overall business strategies and product development plans adopted by these brand owners and their ability to maintain and develop the brands are therefore essential to our business.

As we have limited or no influence on the decisions made by the brand owners in relation to their business strategies, in particular, the production of their existing products and development of new products, we cannot assure that the brand owners will be able to maintain and further develop their brands and/or products, or that our customers will continue to show preferences to their brands and/or products. If the strategies of the brand owners turn out to be unsuccessful or due to any other reasons the marketability of the brands falls substantially, the profitability of our business would be materially and adversely affected.

We cannot assure that our products can meet consumer preferences and needs, and will continue to gain market acceptance and secure market share.

We sell and distribute a variety of beauty device products to the general public through our customers’ sales network. The general acceptance by consumers of the brands and products designed and provided by us is of vital importance to our success and it hinges on a number of factors such as brand image, product quality and customer loyalty. Our success also depends, to a large extent, on our ability to offer a diversified portfolio of products that can meet the changing consumer preferences and needs. There is no assurance that the existing products designed and provided by us will be able to satisfy changes in consumer preferences and needs.

We may also fail to anticipate, identify or respond to the constant changes in relation to consumer preferences and needs on a timely basis, nor can we assure that we will be able to gain or increase market receptiveness and market share for our products.

Consumer preferences and needs for products and brands can change from time to time for various reasons, including negative publicity regarding our products, emergence of competitive products and brands, or a general decrease in demand for the beauty device products distributed and sold us. Any of these events could adversely affect our competitive advantage and market share, which in turn could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.

We rely on external manufacturers for production of all of our products.

We do not have any production facilities or production lines of our own. Our products are sourced from related and independent external manufacturers in mainland China. For the year ended March 31, 2023, payments to each of Zhongshan Raytech and Zhongshan Leimi accounted for 83.1% and 10.4%, respectively, of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the year ended March 31, 2024, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 88.5% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the six months ended September 30, 2023, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 92.7% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company. For the six months ended September 30, 2024, payments to Zhongshan Raytech accounted for 91.5% of the total manufacturing costs of the Company.

Our control over these external manufacturers in respect of their production process and quality of products is limited. We cannot assure that (i) there will not be any unexpected interruption of supply of products by these external manufacturers due to any reason beyond our control or expectation, such as introduction of new regulatory requirements, import restrictions, revocation of business licenses, power interruptions, fires or other force majeure; or (ii) the products provided to us by these external manufacturers can meet our quality requirements. Any such problems in relation to the supply of our products by external manufacturers could have a material adverse impact on our business. 

Our operating results may fluctuate due to seasonality and other factors.

Our sales are subject to certain degree of seasonal fluctuations. Generally, demand for our beauty device products is relatively higher during the spring season from March to June. Sales may also fluctuate during the course of a fiscal year for a number of other reasons, including the timing of launching new products and advertising and promotional campaigns. As a result, these seasonal consumption patterns may cause our operating results to fluctuate from period to period.

We may be unable to maintain growth and implement our future plans.

Our future business growth primarily depends on the successful implementation of our business objectives, business strategies and future plans. These business objectives are based on our existing plans and intentions, most of which are at initial stages and have not been proceeded to the stage of actual implementation and are therefore subject to high degree of risks and uncertainties. Furthermore, we may not be able to achieve the projected growth and expansion of our business due to factors which are beyond our control, such as changes in economic environment, market demands, government policies and relevant laws and regulations. As such, there is no assurance that our business objectives, business strategies and future plans will be accomplished, whether in whole or in part or be implemented within the estimated timeline. In the event that our future plans are not implemented and our business objectives are not accomplished, our business, profitability and financial positions in the future may be materially and adversely affected.

Furthermore, our future business plans may be hindered by other factors beyond our control, such as competition from other retailers and distributors selling similar products. Therefore, there is no assurance that our future business plans will materialize, or result in the conclusion or execution of any agreement within the planned time frame, or that our objectives will be fully or partially accomplished.

A severe or prolonged downturn in the Chinese or global economy could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Any slowdown in the Chinese or global economy may have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. There is uncertainty over the global economic condition such as the trade war between the United States and China. There is considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies adopted by the central banks and financial authorities of some of the world’s leading economies, including the United States and China. There have also been concerns about the economic effect of the tensions in the relationship between China and surrounding Asian countries. Adverse economic conditions could also reduce the number of customers and interests in our services and products. Should any of these situations occur, our net revenues will decline, and our business and financial conditions will be negatively impacted. Additionally, continued turbulence in the international markets may adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs.

Changes in U.S. and international trade policies, particularly with regard to China, may adversely impact our business and operating results.

The U.S. government has recently made statements and taken certain actions that may lead to potential changes to U.S. and international trade policies. For example, on October 28, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a final rule on outbound investment to implement the executive order of August 9, 2023. The final rule became effective on January 2, 2025. The final rule imposes investment prohibition and notification requirements on U.S. persons for a wide range of investments in entities associated with China (including Hong Kong and Macau) that are engaged in activities relating to three sectors: (i) semiconductors and microelectronics, (ii) quantum information technologies, and (iii) artificial intelligence systems, collectively defined as Covered Foreign Persons. U.S. persons subject to the final rule are prohibited from making, or required to report, certain investments in Covered Foreign Persons, which are defined as Covered Transactions. If we were to be deemed a Covered Foreign Person due to changes in our business operations or amendments to relevant laws and regulations, our ability to raise capital would be significantly and negatively affected. In such case, the trading price of the Ordinary Shares may be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, the U.S. has imposed significant tariffs on a wide range of goods imported from China and could impose additional tariffs or increase existing ones. The U.S. government has also implemented export control restrictions affecting certain products and technologies related to China, imposed certain sanctions and restrictions, and indicated the potential for enhanced review of companies with significant China-based operations or restrictions on U.S. investment in certain companies operating in China. Furthermore, policies regarding low-value shipments entering the U.S. are under scrutiny, and changes could impact the cost-effectiveness of certain imports from China. The Chinese government has, from time to time, responded, and may continue to respond, by imposing its own tariffs, trade restrictions, or other regulations. Our business and financial performance are substantially dependent on the general conditions of the global economy and the level of international trade and commerce, particularly between the U.S. and China. The adoption and expansion of trade restrictions, tariffs, quotas, embargoes, sanctions, export controls, investment restrictions, the occurrence of a trade war, or other governmental actions related to tariffs or trade agreements or policies by the U.S., China, or other countries, has the potential to adversely impact trade flows, costs, our suppliers, our customers, and the world economy in general. Current and future trade tensions, geopolitical events, and international trade disputes could harm or disrupt international commerce and the global economy. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected by significant share-based compensation expenses, and the issuance of shares under our equity incentive plans will dilute existing shareholders

To attract, retain, and motivate highly skilled employees, directors, and consultants, which is critical in a competitive talent market, we utilize share-based

awards. Consequently, on September 24, 2024, our Board of Directors adopted, and on October 23, 2024, our shareholders approved, the 2024 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2024 Plan”). The 2024 Plan, which has a ten-year term and authorizes the issuance of up to 2,500,000 of our ordinary shares, allows for the grant of various types of equity awards, including Incentive Share Options, Non-statutory Share Options, Restricted Shares, Restricted Share Units, Share Appreciation Rights, Performance Units, and Performance Shares. While these awards are intended to promote our long-term success and align interests with shareholder value, they require us to recognize share-based compensation expenses in our consolidated financial statements.

Significant share-based compensation expenses could materially and adversely affect our reported net income (or increase our net loss). Furthermore, any issuance of ordinary shares upon the exercise of options or the vesting of other equity awards granted under the 2024 Plan or any future equity incentive plans will result in the dilution of the ownership interests of our existing shareholders, which could also adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

Raytech Holding may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by its subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements it may have, and any limitation on the ability of Raytech Holding’s subsidiary to make payments to it could have a material adverse effect on Raytech Holding’s ability to conduct its business.

Raytech Holding is a holding company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, and it may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by its subsidiaries for its cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to Raytech Holding’s shareholders and service any debt it may incur. If any of Raytech Holding’s subsidiary incurs debt on its own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to Raytech Holding.

Under the current practice of the Inland Revenue Department of Hong Kong, no tax is payable in Hong Kong in respect of dividends paid to us. See “Taxation — Hong Kong Profits Taxation” on page 121 of this prospectus. Any limitation on the ability of Raytech Holding’s Hong Kong subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to Raytech Holding could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to Raytech Holding’s business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct its business.

Raytech Holding’s lack of effective internal controls over financial reporting may affect its ability to accurately report its financial results or prevent fraud, which may affect the market for and price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares.

To implement Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Prior to the IPO, Raytech Holding was a private company with limited accounting personnel and other resources for addressing Raytech Holding’s internal control over financial reporting. Raytech Holding’s management has not completed an assessment of the effectiveness of Raytech Holding’s internal control over financial reporting and its independent registered public accounting firm has not conducted an audit of Raytech Holding’s internal control over financial reporting. However, in connection with the audits of Raytech Holding’s consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023 and 2024, Raytech Holding and its independent registered public accounting firm identified material weaknesses in Raytech Holding’s internal control over financial reporting as well as other control deficiencies for the above mentioned periods. As defined in the standards established by the PCAOB, a “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of Raytech Holding’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness identified related to i) inadequate segregation of duties for certain key functions due to limited staff and resources; ii) a lack of sufficient financial reporting and accounting personnel with appropriate knowledge of U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements to formalize key controls over financial reporting and to prepare consolidated financial statements and related disclosures; and iii) a lack of independent directors and an audit committee to establish formal risk assessment process and internal control framework.

In connection with its IPO, Raytech Holding appointed independent directors, established an audit committee and strengthened corporate governance. In addition, Raytech Holding is actively implementing other measures designed to improve its internal control over financial reporting to address the underlying causes of these material weaknesses, including i) hiring more qualified staff to fill up the key roles in the operations; and ii) setting up a financial and system control framework with formal documentation of polices and controls in place.

As a public company, Raytech Holding is subject to the requirement that it maintains internal controls and that management performs periodic evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls. Effective internal control over financial reporting is important to prevent fraud. As a result, Raytech Holding’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the market for and trading price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares, may be materially and adversely affected if Raytech Holding does not have effective internal controls. The absence of internal controls over financial reporting may inhibit investors from purchasing Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares and may make it more difficult for Raytech Holding to raise funds in a debt or equity financing.

Additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may be identified in the future. If Raytech Holding identifies such issues or if Raytech Holding is unable to produce accurate and timely financial statements, its stock price may decline and it may be unable to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules.

If Raytech Holding ceases to qualify as a foreign private issuer, it would be required to comply fully with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, and it would incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses that it would not incur as a foreign private issuer.

As a foreign private issuer, Raytech Holding is exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and Raytech Holding’s officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, Raytech Holding is not be required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States domestic issuers, and it will not be required to disclose in its periodic reports all of the information that United States domestic issuers are required to disclose. However, Raytech Holding may cease to qualify as a foreign private issuer in the future.

Raytech Holding is an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if Raytech Holding takes advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, this could make it more difficult to compare Raytech Holding’s performance with other public companies.

Raytech Holding is an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. Raytech Holding has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised, and it has different application dates for public or private companies, Raytech Holding, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of Raytech Holding’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used. If some investors find Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares and Raytech Holding’s share price may be more volatile.

Raytech Holding incurs increased costs as a result of being a public company which will increase after Raytech Holding ceases to qualify as an “emerging growth company.”

Raytech Holding incurs significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a public company that Raytech Holding did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, impose various requirements on the corporate governance practices of public companies. Raytech Holding is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act and will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of the public initial offering of the Company, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior fiscal year end, and (2) the date on which Raytech Holding has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control over financial reporting and permission to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies.

Compliance with these rules and regulations increases Raytech Holding’s legal and financial compliance costs and makes some corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. After Raytech Holding is no longer an “emerging growth company,” or until five years following the completion of Raytech Holding’s initial public offering, whichever is earlier, Raytech Holding expects to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC. For example, as a public company, Raytech Holding is required to have independent directors and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. Raytech Holding may incur additional costs in obtaining director and officer liability insurance. In addition, Raytech Holding incurs additional costs associated with its public company reporting requirements. Raytech Holding cannot predict or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs it incur as a public company or the timing of such costs.

Risks Related to Doing Business in Hong Kong

All of Pure Beauty’s operations are in Hong Kong. However, due to the long arm provisions under the current laws and regulations of mainland China, the government of mainland China may exercise significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business and may intervene in or influence our operations at any time, which could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares. The government of mainland China may also intervene or impose restrictions on Raytech Holding’s ability to move money out of Hong Kong to distribute earnings and pay dividends or to reinvest in our business outside of Hong Kong. Changes in the policies, regulations, rules, and the enforcement of laws of the government of mainland China may also be quick with little advance notice and our assertions and beliefs of the risk imposed by the legal and regulatory system of mainland China cannot be certain.

We are not based in mainland China and do not have operations in mainland China except that our manufacturers are located in mainland China. We currently do not have or intend to set up any subsidiary in mainland China, or do not foresee the need to enter into any contractual arrangements with a VIE to establish a VIE structure in mainland China. For the six months ended September 30, 2024, and September 30, 2023 and the fiscal years ended March 31, 2024, and 2023, we generated all our revenues from Hong Kong.

As advised by our PRC counsel, AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), as of the date of this prospectus, on the basis that (i) we currently do not have or intend to set up any subsidiary or VIE structure in mainland China, and we do not have any business operations in mainland China, except that we collaborate with manufacturers located in mainland China to manufacture our products, (iii) none of our and our subsidiaries’ clients are located in mainland China, and (iv) we and our subsidiary possess personal information of less than 1 million individuals in the PRC (for the purpose of this subsection (iv), including the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau and Taiwan), and do not possess any core data or important data of the PRC or any information which affects or may affect national security of the PRC, we do not expect to be materially affected by recent statements by the government of mainland China indicating an intent to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in mainland China-based issuers. However, due to long arm provisions under the current laws and regulations of mainland China, there remains regulatory uncertainty with respect to the implementation and interpretation of laws and regulations in mainland China.

Pursuant to the Basic Law, which is a national law of the PRC and the constitutional document for Hong Kong, national laws of the PRC shall not be applied in Hong Kong except for those listed in Annex III of the Basic Law and applied locally by promulgation or local legislation. The Basic Law expressly provides that the national laws of the PRC which may be listed in Annex III of the Basic Law shall be confined to those relating to defense and foreign affairs as well as other matters outside the autonomy of Hong Kong. The basic policies of the PRC regarding Hong Kong as a special administrative region of the PRC are reflected in the Basic Law, providing Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy and executive, legislative and independent judicial powers, including that of final adjudication under the principle of “one country, two systems”.

However, as the government of mainland China may choose to exercise significant oversight and discretion, and the policies, regulations, rules, and the enforcement of laws of the government of mainland China to which we are subject may change rapidly and with little advance notice to us or our shareholders. As a result, the application, interpretation, and enforcement of new and existing laws and regulations in mainland China are often uncertain. In addition, these laws and regulations may be interpreted and applied inconsistently by different agencies or authorities, and may be inconsistent with our current policies and practices. New laws, regulations, and other government directives in mainland China may also be costly to comply with, and such compliance or any associated inquiries or investigations or any other government actions may:

We are aware that recently, the government of mainland China initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in certain areas in mainland China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over mainland China-based companies listed overseas using variable interest entity structure, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding the efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. Since these statements and regulatory actions are new, it is highly uncertain how soon legislative or administrative regulation making bodies will respond and what existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations will be modified or promulgated, if any, and the potential impact such modified or new laws and regulations will have on our daily business operation, the ability to accept foreign investments and list on a U.S. or other foreign exchange.

The PRC government may intervene or influence our operations at any time or may exert control over offerings conducted overseas and foreign investment in Hong Kong-based issuers, which may result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares. For example, there is currently no restriction or limitation under the laws of Hong Kong on the conversion of HK dollar into foreign currencies and the transfer of currencies out of Hong Kong and the laws and regulations of the PRC on currency conversion control do not currently have any material impact on the transfer of cash between Raytech Holding, the ultimate holding company, and Pure Beauty, the wholly-owned operating subsidiary in Hong Kong. However, the PRC government may, in the future, impose restrictions or limitations on our ability to move money out of Hong Kong to distribute earnings and pay dividends to and from the other entities within our organization or to reinvest in our business outside of Hong Kong. Such restrictions and limitations, if imposed in the future, may delay or hinder the expansion of our business outside of Hong Kong and may affect our ability to receive funds from Pure Beauty. The promulgation of new laws or regulations, or the new interpretation of existing laws and regulations, in each case, that restrict or otherwise unfavorably impact the ability or way we conduct our business, could require us to change certain aspects of our business to ensure compliance, which could decrease demand for our products and services, reduce revenues, increase costs, require us to obtain more licenses, permits, approvals or certificates, or subject us to additional liabilities. To the extent any new or more stringent measures are required to be implemented, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected and such measures could materially decrease the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares, potentially rendering it worthless.

The enactment of Law of the PRC on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the “Hong Kong National Security Law”) could impact our Hong Kong subsidiaries.

On June 30, 2020, the Standing Committee of the PRC National People’s Congress adopted the Hong Kong National Security Law. This law defines the duties and government bodies of the Hong Kong National Security Law for safeguarding national security and four categories of offences — secession, subversion, terrorist activities, and collusion with a foreign or overseas force to endanger national security — and their corresponding penalties. On July 14, 2020, the former U.S. President Donald Trump signed the Hong Kong Autonomy Act (the “HKAA”), into law, authorizing the U.S. administration to impose blocking sanctions against individuals and entities who are determined to have materially contributed to the erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy. On August 7, 2020 the U.S. government imposed HKAA-authorized sanctions on eleven individuals, including former and current HKSAR chief executives Carrie Lam and John Lee. On October 14, 2020, the U.S. State Department submitted to relevant committees of Congress the report required under HKAA, identifying persons materially contributing to “the failure of the Government of China to meet its obligations under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law.” The HKAA further authorizes secondary sanctions, including the imposition of blocking sanctions, against foreign financial institutions that knowingly conduct a significant transaction with foreign persons sanctioned under this authority. The imposition of sanctions may directly affect the foreign financial institutions as well as any third parties or customers dealing with any foreign financial institution that is targeted. It is difficult to predict the full impact of the Hong Kong National Security Law and HKAA on Hong Kong and companies located in Hong Kong. If our Hong Kong subsidiaries are determined to be in violation of the Hong Kong National Security Law or the HKAA by competent authorities, our business operations, financial position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The PRC government may intervene or influence our operations at any time or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and foreign investment in China-based issuers, which may result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares. Additionally, the governmental and regulatory interference could significantly limit or completely hinder Raytech Holding’s ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

There are political risks associated with conducting business in Hong Kong.

Substantially all our operations are based in Hong Kong. Accordingly, our business operations and financial condition will be affected by the political and legal developments in Hong Kong. During the period covered by the financial information included in this prospectus, we derive substantially all of our revenue from operations in Hong Kong. Any adverse economic, social and/or political conditions, material social unrest, strike, riot, civil disturbance or disobedience, as well as significant natural disasters, may adversely affect our business operations. Hong Kong is a special administrative region of the PRC and the basic policies of the PRC regarding Hong Kong are reflected in the Basic Law, namely, Hong Kong’s constitutional document, which provides Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy and executive, legislative and independent judicial powers, including that of final adjudication under the principle of “one country, two systems”. However, there is no assurance that there will not be any changes in the economic, political and legal environment in Hong Kong in the future. Since a substantial part of our operations is based in Hong Kong, any change of such political arrangements may pose an immediate threat to the stability of the economy in Hong Kong, thereby directly and adversely affecting our results of operations and financial position.

If the PRC attempts to alter its agreement to allow Hong Kong to function autonomously, this could potentially impact Hong Kong’s common law legal system and may in turn bring about uncertainty in, for example, the enforcement of our contractual rights. This could, in turn, materially and adversely affect our business and operations. Additionally, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections in Hong Kong may not be as effective as in the United States or other countries. Accordingly, we cannot predict the effect of future developments in the Hong Kong legal system, including the promulgation of new laws, changes to existing laws or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, or the preemption of local regulations by national laws. These uncertainties could limit the legal protections available to us, including our ability to enforce our agreements with our customers.

Under the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of PRC, Hong Kong is exclusively in charge of its internal affairs and external relations, while the government of the PRC is responsible for its foreign affairs and defense. As a separate customs territory, Hong Kong maintains and develops relations with foreign states and regions. Based on certain recent developments including the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region issued by the Standing Committee of the PRC National People’s Congress in June 2020, the U.S. State Department has indicated that the United States no longer considers Hong Kong to have significant autonomy from China and President Trump signed an executive order and the HKAA to remove Hong Kong’s preferential trade status and to authorize the U.S. administration to impose blocking sanctions against individuals and entities who are determined to have materially contributed to the erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy. The United States may impose the same tariffs and other trade restrictions on exports from Hong Kong that it places on goods from mainland China. These and other recent actions may represent an escalation in political and trade tensions involving the U.S, mainland China and Hong Kong, which could potentially harm our business.

Our revenue is susceptible to the ongoing incidents or factors which affect the stability of the social, economic and political conditions in Hong Kong. Any drastic events may adversely affect our business operations. Such adverse events may include changes in economic conditions and regulatory environment, social and/or political conditions, civil disturbance or disobedience, as well as significant natural disasters. Given the relatively small geographical size of Hong Kong, any of such incidents may have a widespread effect on our business operations, which could in turn adversely and materially affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. It is difficult to predict the full impact of the HKAA on Hong Kong and companies with operations in Hong Kong like us. Furthermore, legislative or administrative actions in respect of China-U.S. relations could cause investor uncertainty for affected issuers, including Raytech Holding, and the market price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares could be adversely affected.

There remain some uncertainties as to whether we will be required to obtain approvals from mainland China and Hong Kong authorities to list additional Raytech Holding’s securities on the U.S. exchanges and offer securities in the future, and if required, we cannot assure you that Raytech Holding will be able to obtain such approval. 

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors (the “M&A Rules”), adopted by six regulatory agencies of mainland China in 2006 and amended in 2009, requires an overseas special purpose vehicle formed for listing purposes through acquisitions of mainland China-based companies and controlled by mainland China-based companies or individuals to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such special purpose vehicle’s securities on an overseas stock exchange.

We are also aware that recently, the government of mainland China initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in certain areas in mainland China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over mainland China-based companies listed overseas using variable interest entity structure, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding the efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. For example, on July 6, 2021, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued a document to crack down on illegal activities in the securities market and promote the high-quality development of the capital market, which, among other things, requires the relevant governmental authorities to strengthen cross-border oversight of law-enforcement and judicial cooperation, to enhance supervision over mainland China-based companies listed overseas, and to establish and improve the system of extraterritorial application of the PRC securities laws.

On December 28, 2021, the CAC and other PRC authorities promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures, which took effect on February 15, 2022. In addition, the Cybersecurity Law, which was adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on November 7, 2016 and came into force on June 1, 2017, and the Cybersecurity Review Measures, or the “Review Measures”, provide that personal information and important data collected and generated by a critical information infrastructure operator, or a “CIIO”, in the course of its operations in mainland China must be stored in mainland China, and if a CIIO purchases internet products and services that affect or may affect national security, it should be subject to national security review by the CAC together with competent departments of the State Council. On November 14, 2021, CAC published the Regulations on the Network Data Security Administration Draft, or the “Data Security Regulations Draft”, to solicit public opinion and comments. Under the Data Security Regulations Draft, an overseas initial public offering to be conducted by a data processor processing the personal information of more than one million individuals shall apply for a cybersecurity review. Data processor means an individual or organization that independently makes decisions on the purpose and manner of processing in data processing activities, and data processing activities refers to activities such as the collection, retention, use, processing, transmission, provision, disclosure, or deletion of data.

Currently we do not expect the Review Measures to have an impact on the business and operations of Raytech Holding’s Hong Kong subsidiaries, Pure Beauty and Raytech Innovation, or this offering, because (i) Our Hong Kong subsidiaries are incorporated and operating in Hong Kong without any subsidiary or VIE structure in mainland China, and it is unclear whether the Review Measures shall be applied to a Hong Kong company; (ii) as of the date of this prospectus, Pure Beauty has not collected and stored personal information of any individual customers of mainland China and possesses personal information of less than 1 million individuals in the PRC (for the purpose of this subsection (ii), including the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau and Taiwan), and do not possess any core data or important data of the PRC or any information which affects or may affect national security of the PRC; and (iii) as of the date of this prospectus, neither Pure Beauty nor Raytech Innovation has not been informed by any governmental authority of mainland China of any requirement that it file for a cybersecurity review for the offering. Based on the foregoing and the advice of Raytech Holding’s PRC legal counsel, AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), as of the date of this prospectus, we believe our Hong Kong subsidiaries are not required to pass the cybersecurity review of the CAC in order to list Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares in the U.S. Nonetheless, if the authorized PRC regulatory body subsequently determines that we are required to go through such cybersecurity review or if any other PRC government authorities promulgate any interpretation or implementation rules before Raytech Holding’s listing that would require us to go through a cybersecurity review for this offering, we may fail to complete such cybersecurity review procedures in a timely manner, or at all. Any failure or delay in the completion of the cybersecurity review procedures or any other non-compliance with the related laws and regulations may result in fines or other penalties, reputational damage as well as legal proceedings or actions against us, which may have material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In addition, on December 24, 2021, the CSRC issued the Administrative Provisions of the State Council Regarding the Overseas Issuance and Listing of Securities by Domestic Enterprises (the “Draft Administrative Provisions”) and the Measures for the Overseas Issuance of Securities and Listing Record-Filings by Domestic Enterprises (Draft for Comments) (the “Draft Filing Measures”), collectively, the Draft Rules Regarding Overseas Listings. The Draft Rules Regarding Overseas Listing aim to lay out the filing regulation arrangement for both direct and indirect overseas listing by mainland China-based companies and clarify the determination criteria for indirect overseas listing in overseas markets. According to the Draft Rules Regarding Overseas Listings, among other things, after making initial applications with overseas stock markets for initial public offerings or listings, all mainland China-based companies shall file with the CSRC within three working days.

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC promulgated the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and relevant five guidelines, which became effective on March 31, 2023. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures comprehensively improve and reform the existing regulatory regime for overseas offering and listing of PRC domestic companies’ securities and will regulate both direct and indirect overseas offering and listing of mainland China-based companies’ securities by adopting a filing-based regulatory regime.

According to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, mainland China-based companies that seek to offer and list securities in overseas markets, either in direct or indirect means, are required to fulfill the filing procedure with the CSRC and report relevant information. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures provides that an overseas listing or offering is explicitly prohibited, if: (i) such securities offering and listing is explicitly prohibited by provisions in laws, administrative regulations and relevant state rules; (ii) the intended securities offering and listing may endanger national security as reviewed and determined by competent authorities under the State Council in accordance with law; (iii) the domestic company intending to make the securities offering and listing, or its controlling shareholder(s) and the actual controller, have committed relevant crimes such as corruption, bribery, embezzlement, misappropriation of property or undermining the order of the socialist market economy during the latest three years; (iv) the domestic company intending to make the securities offering and listing is currently under investigations for suspicion of criminal offenses or major violations of laws and regulations, and no conclusion has yet been made thereof; or (v) there are material ownership disputes over equity held by the domestic company’s controlling shareholder(s) or by other shareholder(s) that are controlled by the controlling shareholder(s) and/or actual controller.

The Overseas Listing Trial Measures also provides that if the issuer both meets the following criteria, the overseas securities offering and listing conducted by such issuer will be deemed as indirect overseas offering by PRC domestic companies: (i) 50% or more of any of the issuer’s operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in its audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year is accounted for by domestic companies; and (ii) the main parts of the issuer’s business activities are conducted in mainland China, or its main place(s) of business are located in mainland China, or the majority of senior management staff in charge of its business operations and management are PRC citizens or have their usual place(s) of residence located in mainland China. Where an issuer submits an application for initial public offering to competent overseas regulators, such issuer must file with the CSRC within three business days after such application is submitted. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures also requires subsequent reports to be filed with the CSRC on material events, such as change of control or voluntary or forced delisting of the issuer(s) who have completed overseas offerings and listings.

As advised by Raytech Holding’s PRC Counsel, AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), based on the facts that (i) we do not operate any entities in mainland China and the operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in Raytech Holding’s audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year is accounted for by our Hong Kong subsidiary, Pure Beauty located outside mainland China; (ii) we do not have any equity interest in any manufacturer located in mainland China and vice versa; and (iii) we conduct a majority of our business and are headquartered in Hong Kong rather than in mainland China, and our senior management team are not PRC citizens or have their residence located outside mainland China, we believe that, this offering will not be regarded as a subsequent securities offering in the same overseas market under the Article 15 of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, and are currently not required to complete the filing procedure with the CSRC or to obtain regulatory approval from the CSRC. However, as the Overseas Listing Trial Measures were newly promulgated and there exists substantial uncertainty that the CSRC may take a view that is contrary to our understanding of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures because the Overseas Listing Trial Measures adopts the principle of “substance over form” regarding the determination of “indirect overseas offering and listing by a domestic company,” over which the CSRC may have substantial discretions. If we are required to complete the filing procedures with the CSRC in connection with this offering, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete such filings in a timely manner, or at all, in the future. Any failure by us to comply with such filing could impact our operations materially and adversely, subject us to order to rectify, warnings and fines, and significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

As advised by Raytech Holding’s PRC counsel, AllBright Law Offices (Fuzhou), as of the date of this prospectus, on the basis that (i) we currently do not have or intend to set up any subsidiary or VIE structure in mainland China, (ii) we do not have any business operations in mainland China, except that we collaborate with manufacturers located in mainland China to manufacture the products, (iii) none of our clients are located in mainland China, and (iv) we possess personal information of less than 1 million individuals in the PRC (for the purpose of this subsection (iv), including the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau and Taiwan), and do not possess any core data or important data of the PRC or any information which affects or may affect national security of the PRC, we believe, we are currently not required to obtain any permission or approval from the CAC, or other governmental authorities of mainland China to operate our business or to list Raytech Holding’s securities on the U.S. exchanges and to issue securities to foreign investors, nor have we been denied of any permissions or approvals from the authorities of mainland China. Furthermore, CLKW Lawyers LLP, Raytech Holding’s Hong Kong counsel, has advised Raytech Holding that, as of the date of this prospectus, Raytech Holding is not required to obtain any permission or approval from the governmental authorities of Hong Kong to list on the U.S. exchanges and offer securities and we have obtained all necessary licenses, permissions or approvals including the business registration certificate from the governmental authorities of Hong Kong to operate our business and to the best of our knowledge, no license, permission or approval has been denied.

However, if we (i) do not receive or maintain such permission or approval, should the permission or approval be required in the future by the government of mainland China or Hong Kong, (ii) inadvertently conclude that such permission or approval is not required, or (iii) applicable laws, regulations, or interpretations change and we are required to obtain such permission or approval in the future, we may be unable to obtain such permissions or approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC, the CAC or other PRC or Hong Kong regulatory authorities if we fail to fully comply with any new regulatory requirements. Consequently, our operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected, and Raytech Holding’s ability to offer securities to investors could be significantly limited or completely hindered and the securities currently being offered may substantially decline in value and become worthless.

We are aware that recently, the government of mainland China initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in certain areas in mainland China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over mainland China-based companies listed overseas using variable interest entity structure, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding the efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. Nevertheless, since these statements and regulatory actions are new, it is highly uncertain how soon the legislative or administrative regulation making bodies will respond and what existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations will be modified or promulgated, if any. It is also highly uncertain what potential impact such modified or new laws and regulations will have on Pure Beauty’s daily business operations, Raytech Holding’s ability to accept foreign investments and the listing of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares on a U.S. or other foreign exchanges. If there is significant change to current political arrangements between mainland China and Hong Kong, the PRC government intervenes or influences operations of companies operated in Hong Kong like us, or exerts more control through change of laws and regulations over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in issuers like Raytech Holding, it may result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of the securities Raytech Holding is registering for sale or could significantly limit or completely hinder Raytech Holding’s ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or become worthless.

Rules for cross-border provision and examination of auditing records and other materials in connection with overseas securities issuance and listing was released by CSRC and became effective The government of mainland China may impose more stringent requirement for domestic Chinese companies to share business and accounting records with foreign auditing firms and other securities service institutions, which could significantly limit or completely hinder Raytech Holding’s ability to offer or continue to offer its Ordinary Shares to investors and could cause the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or become worthless.

On April 2, 2022, the CSRC, in conjunction with the Ministry of Finance, the National Administration of State Secret Protection and the National Archives Administration, issued the Regulations on Enhancing Confidentiality and File Management in Relation to Overseas Securities Issuance and Listing by Domestic Enterprises (Draft for Comments, the “Draft Regulations”), an amendment to the original regulation of the same name published in 2009. The Draft Regulations extend the scope of application of the regulations to indirectly listed enterprises, and expand the definition of “domestic enterprises” to encompass domestic corporations directly listed on overseas exchanges as well as the domestic operating subsidiaries of indirectly listed companies. The Draft Regulations requires that, before providing or publicly disclosing documents and materials involving state secrets or government work secrets to security brokers, security service providers, or overseas regulators, the domestic enterprises shall seek approval from the relevant government regulators, and make filings with the local secret protection regulators at the same government level.

The Draft Regulations expand the scope of the regulations from “state secrets” to “state secrets and work secrets of government agencies”. However, the Draft Regulations do not define the scope of such secrets, but merely state that “in case where it is unclear or disputed as to whether state secrets are involved, the issue shall be submitted to the relevant secret protection regulator for determination; in case where it is unclear or disputed as to whether government work secrets are involved, the issue shall be submitted to the relevant government regulator for determination.”

The Draft Regulations mandates that domestic enterprises need to follow the prescribed procedures before furnishing “accounting records or copies of accounting records of significant state or societal storage value” to relevant security brokers, security service providers, and overseas regulators. If it is necessary to transmit such materials of significance out of mainland China, the relevant enterprises need to follow the prescribed procedures for advance approval. Similarly, if an overseas accounting firm intends to provide auditing work on a domestic enterprise seeking overseas listing, the accounting firm shall follow the prescribed procedures under the relevant state laws and regulations. A domestic enterprise shall not provide accounting records to an overseas accounting firm or network who has not satisfied the prescribed procedures.

On February 24, 2023, the CSRC, Ministry of Finance of the PRC, National Administration of State Secrets Protection and National Archives Administration of China promulgated the Provisions on Strengthening Confidentiality and Archives Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Archives Rules, which took effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Archives Rules, domestic companies that seek for overseas offering and listing shall strictly abide by applicable laws and regulations of the PRC and the Archives Rules, enhance legal awareness of keeping state secrets and strengthening archives administration, institute a sound confidentiality and archives administration system, and take necessary measures to fulfill confidentiality and archives administration obligations. Such domestic companies shall not leak any state secret and working secret of government agencies, or harm national security and public interest. Furthermore, a domestic company that plans to, either directly or through its overseas listed entity, publicly disclose or provide to relevant individuals or entities including securities companies, securities service providers and overseas regulators, any document and materials that contain state secrets or working secrets of government agencies, shall first obtain approval from competent authorities according to law, and file with the secrecy administrative department at the same level. Moreover, a domestic company that plans to, either directly or through its overseas listed entity, publicly disclose or provide to relevant individuals and entities including securities companies, securities service providers and overseas regulators, any other documents and materials that, if leaked, will be detrimental to national security or public interest, shall strictly fulfill relevant procedures stipulated by applicable national regulations. The Archives Rules also stipulate that a domestic company that provides accounting archives or copies of accounting archives to any entities including securities companies, securities service providers and overseas regulators and individuals shall fulfill due procedures in compliance with applicable national regulations. As we are not domestic companies, and do not plan to leak any state secret and working secret of government agencies, or harm national security or public interest in connection with provision of documents, materials and accounting archives, we believe we may not be required to obtain relevant approval or file with the secrecy administrative department in accordance with the Archives Rules with respect to the offering. However, as the Archives Rules was newly published, there are substantial uncertainties as to the implementation and interpretation, if we are required to perform additional procedures in connection with the provision of accounting archives or other documents, we cannot assure you that we will be able to fulfill such procedures in a timely manner, or even at all. Any failure by us to comply with the Archives Rules may materially adversely affected, our ability to offer securities to investors to become significantly limited or completely hindered.

On August 26, 2022, a Statement of Protocol was signed by the PCAOB, the CSRC and the Ministry of Finance of the PRC governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in mainland China and Hong Kong. Pursuant to the Statement of Protocol, the PCAOB conducted inspections on select registered public accounting firms subject to the Determination Report in Hong Kong between September and November 2022. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB board announced that it has completed the inspections, determined that it had complete access to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, and voted to vacate the Determination Report. On December 29, 2022, the CAA was signed into law by President Biden. The CAA contained, among other things, an identical provision to the AHFCAA, which reduces the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCA Act from three years to two.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain any approval or authorization from relevant secret protection regulator or other government authorities in a timely manner, or any such approval or authorization can be obtained at all if we are required to obtain any approval or authorization. Failure to obtain the necessary approvals or complete the required filings in a timely manner may result in the failure to complete the listing or subject us to fines, penalties or other sanctions, which may have a significant adverse impact on our financial position and operations.

In addition, the Archives Rules take into account the international practice of cross-border audit regulatory co-operation and requires that “on-site inspections should be conducted mainly by CSRC and Chinese regulators, or rely on the inspection results of Chinese regulators” stated in the Regulations on Enhancing Confidentiality and File Management in Relation to Overseas Securities Issuance and Listing published in 2009. The Archives Rules make it clear that the CSRC or Chinese regulators shall provide necessary support through multilateral or bilateral cooperation mechanism for cross-border investigation and examination carried out by overseas securities administrative authorities and regulators on mainland China enterprises seeking overseas listings and security brokers or security service providers providing securities services for such domestic enterprises in respect of their activities relating to such overseas issuance and listings. However, there is no existing tried-and-proved mechanisms for cross-border regulatory cooperation, and it is difficult to carry out shareholder claims or regulatory investigations in mainland China similar to those in the United States, due to various legal and practical problems.

Although we do not believe that we are currently prohibited from providing its accounting records to our auditor or that we or our auditor would be required to go through any prescribed procedures for approval under current laws and regulations of mainland China, we may be subject to additional compliance requirements in the future. Since the Archive Rules are newly promulgated, and the interpretation and implementation are not very clear, we cannot assure you that we will be able to receive clearance of such regulatory requirements in a timely manner, or at all, in the future. If the CSRC, the state secret protection regulator or any other relevant government regulator require that we obtain approval or complete relevant procedure prior to the completion of this offering, the offering will be delayed until we have obtained such approval or completed such procedure. There is also the possibility that we may not be able to obtain or maintain such approval, complete such procedure or that we inadvertently concluded that such approval or procedure was not required. If prior approval or procedure was required while we inadvertently concluded that such approval or procedure was not required or if applicable laws and regulations or the interpretation of such were modified to require us to obtain such approval or procedure in the future, we may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other regulatory authorities of mainland China. Any failure of us to fully comply with new regulatory requirements may significantly limit or completely hinder Raytech Holding’s ability to offer or continue to offer the Ordinary Shares, cause significant disruption to our business operations, severely damage our reputation, materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, and cause the Ordinary Shares to significantly decline in value or become worthless.

It may be difficult for overseas shareholders and/or regulators to conduct investigations or collect evidence within mainland China.

Shareholder claims or regulatory investigations that are common in the United States generally are difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in mainland China. For example, in mainland China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation initiated outside mainland China. Although the authorities in mainland China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the Unities States may not be efficient in the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanisms. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law of mainland China of the PRC, or Article 177, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the mainland China. While detailed interpretation of or implementation rules under Article 177 have yet to be promulgated, the inability for an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within mainland China may further increase difficulties faced by you in protecting your interests.

Our principal business operation is conducted in Hong Kong. In the event that the U.S. regulators carry out investigation on Raytech Holding and there is a need to conduct investigation or collect evidence within the territory of the mainland China, the U.S. regulators may not be able to carry out such investigation or evidence collection directly in mainland China under the laws and regulations of mainland China. The U.S. regulators may consider cross-border cooperation with securities regulatory authority of mainland China by way of judicial assistance, diplomatic channels or regulatory cooperation mechanism established with the securities regulatory authority of mainland China.

You may incur additional costs and procedural obstacles in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in Hong Kong against Raytech Holding or its management named in the prospectus based on Hong Kong laws.

Currently, all of our operations are conducted outside the United States, and all of our assets are located outside the United States. All of Raytech Holding’s directors and officers are Hong Kong nationals or residents and a substantial portion of their assets are located in Hong Kong. You may incur additional costs and procedural obstacles in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in Hong Kong against Raytech Holding or its management named in the prospectus, as judgments entered in the United States can be enforced in Hong Kong only at common law. If you want to enforce a judgment of the United States in Hong Kong, it must be a final judgment conclusive upon the merits of the claim, for a liquidated amount in a civil matter and not in respect of taxes, fines, penalties, or similar charges, the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained were not contrary to natural justice, and the enforcement of the judgment is not contrary to public policy of Hong Kong. Such a judgment must be for a fixed sum and must also come from a “competent” court as determined by the private international law rules applied by the Hong Kong courts. For more information regarding the relevant laws of the British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong, see “Enforceability of Civil Liabilities” beginning on page 58 of this prospectus.

We may be affected by the currency peg system in Hong Kong.

Since 1983, Hong Kong dollars have been pegged to the U.S. dollars at the rate of approximately HK$7.80 to US$1.00. We cannot assure you that this policy will not be changed in the future. If the pegging system collapses and Hong Kong dollars suffer devaluation, the Hong Kong dollar cost of our expenditures denominated in foreign currency may increase. This would in turn adversely affect the operations and profitability of our business.

Risks Related to Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares and This Offering

Although the audit report included in this prospectus is prepared by U.S. auditors who are subject to PCAOB inspections on a regular basis, there is no guarantee that future audit reports will be prepared by auditors inspected by the PCAOB and, as such, in the future investors may be deprived of the benefits of such inspection. Furthermore, trading in Raytech Holding’s securities may be prohibited under the HFCA Act if the SEC subsequently determines Raytech Holding’s audit work is performed by auditors that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely, and as a result, U.S. national securities exchanges, such as the Nasdaq, may determine to delist Raytech Holding’s securities. Furthermore, on June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the AHFCAA, which would amend the HFCA Act and require the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges if its auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three, thus reducing the time period for triggering the prohibition on trading.

As an auditor of companies that are registered with the SEC and publicly traded in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, Raytech Holding’s auditor is required under the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB to assess their compliance with the laws of the United States and professional standards. The PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the PRC government authorities. Raytech Holding’s U.S. auditor is subject to PCAOB inspections on a regular basis, and we have no operations in mainland China. However, if there is significant change to current political arrangements between mainland China and Hong Kong, companies operated in Hong Kong like us may face similar regulatory risks as those operated in mainland China and we cannot assure you that Raytech Holding’s auditor’s work will continue to be able to be inspected by the PCAOB.

As part of a continued regulatory focus in the United States on access to audit and other information currently protected by national law, in particular mainland China’s, in June 2019, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced bills in both houses of the U.S. Congress which, if passed, would require the SEC to maintain a list of issuers for which PCAOB is not able to inspect or investigate the audit work performed by a foreign public accounting firm completely. The proposed Ensuring Quality Information and Transparency for Abroad-Based Listings on our Exchanges (“EQUITABLE”) Act prescribes increased disclosure requirements for these issuers and, beginning in 2025, the delisting from U.S. national securities exchanges such as the Nasdaq of issuers included on the SEC’s list for three consecutive years, thus reducing the time period for triggering the prohibition on trading. It is unclear if this proposed legislation will be enacted. Furthermore, there have been recent deliberations within the U.S. government regarding potentially limiting or restricting China-based companies from accessing U.S. capital markets. On May 20, 2020, the U.S. Senate passed the HFCA Act, which includes requirements for the SEC to identify issuers whose audit work is performed by auditors that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a restriction imposed by a non-U.S. authority in the auditor’s local jurisdiction. The U.S. House of Representatives passed the HFCA Act on December 2, 2020, and the HFCA Act was signed into law on December 18, 2020. Additionally, in July 2020, the U.S. President’s Working Group on Financial Markets issued recommendations for actions that can be taken by the executive branch, the SEC, the PCAOB or other federal agencies and department with respect to Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges and their audit firms, in an effort to protect investors in the United States. In response, on November 23, 2020, the SEC issued guidance highlighting certain risks (and their implications to U.S. investors) associated with investments in China-based issuers and summarizing enhanced disclosures the SEC recommends China-based issuers make regarding such risks. On March 24, 2021, the SEC adopted interim final rules relating to the implementation of certain disclosure and documentation requirements of the HFCA Act. Raytech Holding will be required to comply with these rules if the SEC identifies Raytech Holding as having a “non-inspection” year (as defined in the interim final rules) under a process to be subsequently established by the SEC. The SEC is assessing how to implement other requirements of the HFCA Act, including the listing and trading prohibition requirements described above. Under the HFCA Act, Raytech Holding’s securities may be prohibited from trading on the Nasdaq or other U.S. stock exchanges if Raytech Holding’s auditor is not inspected by the PCAOB for three consecutive years, and this ultimately could result in Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares being delisted. Furthermore, on June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the AHFCAA, which would amend the HFCA Act and require the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges if its auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three, thus reducing the time period for triggering the prohibition on trading. On September 22, 2021, the PCAOB adopted a final rule implementing the AHFCAA, which provides a framework for the PCAOB to use when determining, as contemplated under the AHFCAA, whether the Board is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. On November 5, 2021, the SEC approved the PCAOB’s Rule 6100, Board Determinations Under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. Rule 6100 provides a framework for the PCAOB to use when determining, as contemplated under the AHFCAA, whether it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. On December 2, 2021, the SEC issued amendments to finalize rules implementing the submission and disclosure requirements in the AHFCAA. The rules apply to registrants that the SEC identifies as having filed an annual report with an audit report issued by a registered public accounting firm that is located in a foreign jurisdiction and that PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by an authority in foreign jurisdictions. On December 16, 2021, the SEC announced that the PCAOB designated mainland China and Hong Kong as the jurisdictions where the PCAOB is not allowed to conduct full and complete audit inspections as mandated under the HFCA Act. On August 26, 2022, a Statement of Protocol was signed by the PCAOB, the CSRC and the Ministry of Finance of the PRC governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in mainland China and Hong Kong. Pursuant to the Statement of Protocol, the PCAOB conducted inspections on select registered public accounting firms subject to the Determination Report in Hong Kong between September and November 2022. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB board announced that it has completed the inspections, determined that it had complete access to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, and voted to vacate the Determination Report. On December 29, 2022, the CAA was signed into law by President Biden. The CAA contained, among other things, an identical provision to the AHFCAA, which reduces the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCA Act from three years to two. Raytech Holding’s auditor is based in the United States, and therefore is not currently subject to the determinations announced by the PCAOB on December 16, 2021. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the future, if there is any regulatory change or step taken by PRC regulators that does not permit WWC, P.C. to provide audit work papers located in mainland China or Hong Kong to the PCAOB for inspection or investigation, or the PCAOB re-evaluates its determination as a result of any obstruction with the implementation of the Statement of Protocol in the future, the trading in Raytech Holding’s securities may be prohibited under the HFCA Act, ultimately resulting in a determination by a securities exchange to delist our securities. Delisting of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares would force holders of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to sell their Ordinary Shares. The market price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares could be adversely affected as a result of anticipated negative impacts of these executive or legislative actions upon, regardless of whether these executive or legislative actions are implemented and regardless of our actual operating performance.

The SEC is assessing how to implement other requirements of the AHFCAA, including the listing and trading prohibition requirements described above. Future developments in respect of increasing U.S. regulatory access to audit information are uncertain, as the legislative developments are subject to the legislative process and the regulatory developments are subject to the rule-making process and other administrative procedures.

Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares are thinly traded and you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell your shares to raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares are “thinly-traded”, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation may be attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that Raytech Holding is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if Raytech Holding came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and might be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as Raytech Holding or purchase or recommend the purchase of Raytech Holding’s shares until such time as Raytech Holding became more seasoned. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in Raytech Holding’s shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. A broad or active public trading market for Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares may not develop or be sustained.

The market price for our Ordinary Shares may be volatile and could decline significantly, potentially subjecting us to securities litigation.

The trading price of our Ordinary Shares is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors both specific to our company and related to broader market conditions, many of which are beyond our control.

As a company with a relatively recent IPO and potentially a smaller public float compared to seasoned issuers, we may experience significant price volatility. There have been instances of extreme stock price run-ups followed by rapid price declines and strong volatility with a number of recent initial public offerings, especially among companies with relatively smaller public floats. Our status may contribute to greater stock price volatility, extreme price run-ups, lower trading volume, and less liquidity than large-capitalization companies. In particular, our Ordinary Shares may be subject to rapid and substantial price volatility, low volumes of trades, and large spreads in bid and ask prices. Such volatility, including any stock run-up, may be unrelated or disproportionate to our actual or expected operating performance, financial condition, or prospects, making it difficult for prospective investors to assess the rapidly changing value of our Ordinary Shares.

Furthermore, the trading performances and market perceptions of other companies based in Hong Kong or China that have listed their securities in the United States may significantly impact the trading performance of our Ordinary Shares, regardless of our actual operating performance. This can happen due to broad market and industry factors, such as the performance and fluctuation in the market prices or the underperformance or deteriorating financial results of these other companies. Any negative news or perceptions about inadequate corporate governance practices, fraudulent accounting, corporate structure, or other matters relating to other Hong Kong or Chinese companies may also negatively affect investor attitudes towards Hong Kong or Chinese companies in general, including us, regardless of whether we have engaged in any inappropriate activities.

In addition, if the trading volume of our Ordinary Shares is low, persons buying or selling in relatively small quantities may easily influence the market price. Low trading volume could also cause the price of our Ordinary Shares to fluctuate greatly, with large percentage changes potentially occurring in a single trading day. Broad market fluctuations and general economic and political conditions may also adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares. Securities markets may from time to time experience significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to our operating performance.

Specific factors that may cause the price and trading volume of our Ordinary Shares to be highly volatile include, but are not limited to:

In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. We may, in the future, be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.

You will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value of Ordinary Shares purchased.

The offering price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares is substantially higher than the (pro forma) net tangible book value per share of its Ordinary Shares. Consequently, when you purchase Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares in the offering and upon completion of the offering, you will incur immediate dilution of $[*] per share, at an initial public offering price of $[*]. See “Dilution” on page 61 of this prospectus.

Substantial future sales of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares or the anticipation of future sales of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares in the public market could cause the price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to decline.

Sales of substantial amounts of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares in the public market after this offering, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to decline. An aggregate of 17,613,083 Ordinary Shares are outstanding before the consummation of this offering and 47,613,083 Ordinary Shares will be outstanding immediately after the consummation of this offering. Sales of these shares into the market could cause the market price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares to decline.

Raytech Holding does not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

Raytech Holding currently intends to retain all available funds and future earnings, if any, for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to Raytech Holding’s dividend policy will be made at the discretion of Raytech Holding’s board of directors after considering our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual requirements, business prospects and other factors the board of directors deems relevant, and subject to the restrictions contained in any future financing instruments.

Since its IPO, Raytech Holdings has not declared any dividends. If Raytech Holding determines to pay dividends on any of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares in the future, as a holding company, it will be dependent on receipt of funds from its Hong Kong subsidiaries. Under the current practice of the Inland Revenue Department of Hong Kong, no tax is payable in Hong Kong in respect of dividends paid by Raytech Holding.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about Raytech Holding’s business, or if they publish a negative report regarding Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares, the price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares may depend in part on the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about Raytech Holding or its business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover Raytech Holding downgrade Raytech Holding, the price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of Raytech Holding or fail to regularly publish reports on Raytech Holding, Raytech Holding could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares and the trading volume to decline.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because Raytech Holding is incorporated under British Virgin Islands law.

Raytech Holding is a company incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. Raytech Holding’s corporate affairs are governed by its memorandum and articles of association, the BVI Act and the common law of the British Virgin Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against Raytech Holding’s directors, actions by its minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of Raytech Holding’s directors to it under the British Virgin Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the British Virgin Islands. The common law of the British Virgin Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the British Virgin Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the British Virgin Islands. The rights of Raytech Holding’s shareholders and the fiduciary duties of its directors under the British Virgin Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the British Virgin Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the British Virgin Islands. In addition, British Virgin Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Certain corporate governance practices in the British Virgin Islands, where Raytech Holding was incorporated, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. As a foreign private issuer, Raytech Holding is permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of certain corporate governance requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. As further described below, Raytech Holding is relying on certain of these exemptions. If Raytech Holding chooses to follow additional British Virgin Islands’ practices in the future, or continues to rely on current exemptions, its shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares and This Offering – As a foreign private issuer, Raytech Holding is permitted to, and Raytech Holding is relying on exemptions from certain Nasdaq Stock Exchange corporate governance standards applicable to domestic U.S. issuers. This may afford less protection to holders of Raytech Holding’s shares.” on page 55 of this prospectus.

As a result of all of the above, public shareholders may have more difficulties in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by Raytech Holding’s management, or members of its board of directors, than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States. For a discussion of significant differences between the provisions of the BVI Act and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders, see “Description of Shares—Differences in Corporate Law.” beginning on page 109 of this prospectus.

As a foreign private issuer, Raytech Holding is permitted to, and Raytech Holding is, relying on exemptions from certain Nasdaq Stock Exchange corporate governance standards applicable to domestic U.S. issuers. This may afford less protection to holders of Raytech Holding’s shares.

Raytech Holding is exempted from certain corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq listing rules by virtue of being a foreign private issuer. Raytech Holding is required to provide a brief description of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the corporate governance practices required to be followed by domestic U.S. companies listed on the Nasdaq. The standards applicable to Raytech Holding are considerably different than the standards applied to domestic U.S. issuers. For instance, Raytech Holding is not required to:

Raytech Holding is relying on some or all of these exemptions and may continue to do so. As a result, you may not be provided with the benefits of certain corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq.

If Raytech Holding cannot continue to satisfy, the continued listing requirements and other rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market applicable to it, our securities may be delisted, which could negatively impact the price of Raytech Holding’s securities and your ability to sell them.

The Ordinary Shares commenced trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “RAY” on May 15, 2024. However, we cannot assure you that Raytech Holding’s securities will continue to be listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market.

In order to maintain Raytech Holding’s listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, Raytech Holding is required to comply with certain rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market, including those regarding minimum share price and certain corporate governance requirements. Although Raytech Holding has initially met the listing requirements and other applicable rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market, it may not be able to continue to satisfy these requirements and applicable rules. If Raytech Holding is unable to satisfy the Nasdaq Capital Market criteria for maintaining our listing, its securities could be subject to delisting.

If the Nasdaq Capital Market delists Raytech Holding’s securities from trading, Raytech Holding could face significant consequences, including:

Because our business is conducted in Hong Kong dollars and the price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares is quoted in United States dollars, changes in currency conversion rates may affect the value of your investments.

Our business is conducted in Hong Kong, our books and records are maintained in Hong Kong dollars, which is the currency of Hong Kong, and the financial statements that Raytech Holding files with the SEC and provide to its shareholders are presented in United States dollars. Changes in the exchange rate between the Hong Kong dollar and U.S. dollar affect the value of our assets and the results of our operations in United States dollars. The value of the Hong Kong dollar against the United States dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in Hong Kong’s political and economic conditions and perceived changes in the economy of Hong Kong and the United States. Any significant revaluation of the Hong Kong dollar may materially and adversely affect our cash flows, revenue and financial condition. Further, although Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares offered by this prospectus are denominated in United States dollars, Raytech Holding will need to convert the net proceeds it receives into Hong Kong dollars in order to use the funds for our business. Changes in the conversion rate between the United States dollar and the Hong Kong dollar will affect that amount of proceeds Raytech Holding will have available for our business.

Raytech Holding has broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.

Raytech Holding’s management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds, including for any of the purposes described in the section entitled “Use of Proceeds,” and you will not have the opportunity as part of your investment decision to assess whether the net proceeds are being used appropriately. Because of the number and variability of factors that will determine Raytech Holding’s use of the net proceeds from this offering, their ultimate use may vary substantially from their currently intended use. The failure by Raytech Holding’s management to apply these funds effectively could harm our business.

There can be no assurance that Raytech Holding will not be a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares.

A non-U.S. corporation will be a PFIC for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for such year consists of certain types of “passive” income; or (2) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, or the asset test. Based on Raytech Holding’s current and expected income and assets (taking into account the expected cash proceeds and our anticipated market capitalization following this offering), Raytech Holding does not presently expect to be a PFIC for the current taxable year or the foreseeable future. However, no assurance can be given in this regard because the determination of whether Raytech Holding is or will become a PFIC is a fact-intensive inquiry made on an annual basis that depends, in part, upon the composition of Raytech Holding’s income and assets. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, will agree with Raytech Holding’s conclusion or that the IRS would not successfully challenge Raytech Holding’s position. Fluctuations in the market price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares may cause Raytech Holding to become a PFIC for the current or subsequent taxable years because the value of Raytech Holding’s total assets for purposes of the asset test generally will be determined by reference to the market price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares. The composition of Raytech Holding’s income and assets may also be affected by how, and how quickly, it uses its liquid assets and the cash raised in this offering. If Raytech Holding were to be or become a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to such U.S. Holder and such U.S. Holder may be subject to additional reporting requirements and increased U.S. federal income tax liability. Our status as a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis. Accordingly, our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status and also expresses no opinion with regard to our expectations regarding our PFIC status. For a more detailed discussion of the application of the PFIC rules to Raytech Holding and the consequences to U.S. taxpayers if Raytech Holding were or are determined to be a PFIC, see “Taxation— Passive Foreign Investment Company.” beginning on page 119 of this prospectus.

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements, all of which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. You can find many (but not all) of these statements by the use of words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “hopes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may” or other similar expressions in this prospectus. These statements are likely to address our growth strategy, financial results and product and development programs. You must carefully consider any such statements and should understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements. These factors may include inaccurate assumptions and a broad variety of other risks and uncertainties, including some that are known and some that are not. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

We describe material risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could affect our business, including our financial condition and results of operations, under “Risk Factors” Beginning on page 26 of this prospectus. We base our forward-looking statements on our management’s beliefs and assumptions based on information available to our management at the time the statements are made. We caution you that actual outcomes and results may, and are likely to, differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecast by our forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should be careful about relying on any forward-looking statements. Except as required under the federal securities laws, we do not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements after the distribution of this prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or otherwise.

Industry Data and Forecasts

This prospectus contains certain data and information that we obtained from various government and private publications. Statistical data in these publications also include projections based on a number of assumptions. personal care electrical device industries in Hong Kong and greater Asia, may not grow at the rate projected by market data, or at all. Failure of this industry to grow at the projected rate may have a material and adverse effect on our business and the market price of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares. In addition, the new and rapidly changing nature of the personal care electrical appliance industry results in significant uncertainties for any projections or estimates relating to the growth prospects or future condition of our industry. Furthermore, if any one or more of the assumptions underlying the market data are later found to be incorrect, actual results may differ from the projections based on these assumptions. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES

Raytech Holding is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands to take advantage of certain benefits associated with being a British Virgin Islands business company, such as:

However, certain disadvantages accompany incorporation in the British Virgin Islands. These disadvantages include, but are not limited to:

Raytech Holding’s amended and restated memorandum and articles of association do not contain provisions requiring that disputes, including those arising under the securities laws of the United States, between us, Raytech Holding’s officers, directors and shareholders, be arbitrated.

All of Raytech Holding’s assets are located in Hong Kong. In addition, all of Raytech Holding’s directors and officers are nationals or residents of Hong Kong. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon Raytech Holding or these persons, or to enforce against Raytech Holding or them judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.

Raytech Holding has appointed Puglisi & Associates as its agent to receive service of process upon whom process may be served in any action brought against us under the securities laws of the United States.

Harney Westwood & Riegels, Raytech Holding’s British Virgin Islands counsel, and CLKW Lawyers LLP, Raytech Holding’s Hong Kong counsel, have advised Raytech Holding that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the BVI or Hong Kong would (i) recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against Raytech Holding or its directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States or (ii) entertain original actions brought in the British Virgin Islands or Hong Kong against Raytech Holding or its directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.

Raytech Holding’s has been advised by Harney Westwood & Riegels that the United States and the BVI do not have a treaty providing for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts of the United States in civil and commercial matters and that a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any general or state court in the United States based on civil liability, whether or not predicated solely upon the U.S. federal securities laws, would not be automatically enforceable in the BVI. Raytech Holding has also been advised by Harney Westwood & Riegels that the courts of the BVI would treat a final and conclusive monetary judgment for a definitive sum obtained against us in the U.S. federal or state courts as a cause of action in itself and sued upon as a debt at common law so that no retrial of the issues would be necessary provided that (a) such U.S. federal or state courts had jurisdiction in the matter and we either submitted to such jurisdiction or was resident or carrying on business within such jurisdiction and was duly served with process, (b) the judgment given by such U.S. federal or state courts was not in respect of penalties, fines, taxes or similar fiscal or revenue obligations, (c) in obtaining judgment there was no fraud on the part of the person in whose favour judgment was given or on the part of such U.S. federal or state courts, (d) recognition or enforcement in the BVI would not be contrary to public policy, and (e) the proceedings pursuant to which judgment was obtained were not contrary to the principles of natural justice. 

CLKW Lawyers LLP, Raytech Holding’s Hong Kong counsel, has further advised Raytech Holding that foreign judgments of United States courts will not be directly enforced in Hong Kong as there are currently no treaties or other arrangements providing for reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments between Hong Kong and the United States. However, the common law permits an action to be brought upon a foreign judgment. That is to say, a foreign judgment itself may form the basis of a cause of action since the judgment may be regarded as creating a debt between the parties to it. In a common law action for enforcement of a foreign judgment in Hong Kong, the enforcement is subject to various conditions, including but not limited to, that the foreign judgment is a final judgment conclusive upon the merits of the claim, the judgment is for a liquidated amount in civil matter and not in respect of taxes, fines, penalties, or similar charges, the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained were not contrary to natural justice, and the enforcement of the judgment is not contrary to public policy of Hong Kong. Such a judgment must be for a fixed sum and must also come from a “competent” court as determined by the private international law rules applied by the Hong Kong courts. The defenses that are available to a defendant in a common law action brought on the basis of a foreign judgment include lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, fraud, and contrary to public policy. However, a separate legal action for debt must be commenced in Hong Kong in order to recover such debt from the judgment debtor. As a result, subject to the conditions with regard to enforcement of judgments of United States courts being met, including but not limited to the above, a foreign judgment of the United States of civil liabilities predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States or the securities laws of any State or territory within the United States could be enforceable in Hong Kong.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering of approximately $[●], assuming the sale of 30,000,000 Ordinary Shares we are offering, after deducting the Placement agent’s fees, the non-accountable expense allowance, and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

Raytech Holding plans to use the net proceeds we receive from this offering for the following purposes:

As of this prospectus date, we have no specific acquisition or investment targets, agreements, or commitments. We intend to seek complementary businesses, technologies, or assets that expand our market reach or offer other strategic benefits, primarily focusing on targets within the personal care industry.

The foregoing represents our current intentions based upon our present plans and business conditions to use and allocate the net proceeds of this Offering. Our management, however, will have significant flexibility and discretion to apply the net proceeds of this Offering. If an unforeseen event occurs or business conditions change, we may use the proceeds of this Offering differently than as described in this prospectus. To the extent that the net proceeds Raytech Holding receive from this Offering are not immediately used for the above purposes, we intend to invest our net proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing bank deposits or debt instruments.

In relation to our IPO of 1,500,000 Class A Ordinary Shares which were sold at an offering price of $4.00 per share, we received aggregate gross proceeds of $6.0 million from the IPO, before deducting underwriting discounts and other related expenses.

We have earmarked and have been using the proceeds of the IPO as follows: 25% on brand promotion and marketing; 25% on recruitment of talented personnel; 25% on strategic investments and acquisitions; and 25% on general working capital.

DIVIDEND POLICY

Subject to the BVI Act and Raytech Holding’s amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, Raytech Holding’s board of directors may authorize and declare a dividend to shareholders at such time and of such an amount as they think fit if they are satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that immediately following the dividend the value of Raytech Holding’s assets will exceed its liabilities and Raytech Holding will be able to pay its debts as they become due. There is no further BVI statutory restriction on the amount of funds which may be distributed by us by dividend.

Since its IPO, Raytech Holdings has not declared any dividends. If Raytech Holding determines to pay dividends on any of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares in the future, as a holding company, Raytech Holding will be dependent on receipt of funds from its Hong Kong subsidiary Pure Beauty. Under the current practice of the Inland Revenue Department of Hong Kong, no tax is payable in Hong Kong in respect of dividends paid by Raytech Holding.

Raytech Holding currently intends to retain all available funds and future earnings, if any, for the operation and expansion of our business and does not anticipate declaring or paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to Raytech Holding’s dividend policy will be made at the discretion of Raytech Holding’s board of directors after considering Raytech Holding’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual requirements, business prospects and other factors the board of directors deems relevant, and subject to the restrictions contained in any future financing instruments.

If Raytech Holding determines to pay dividends on any of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares in the future, as a holding company, Raytech Holding will be dependent on receipt of funds from its Hong Kong subsidiary, Pure Beauty.

Cash dividends, if any, on Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares will be paid in U.S. dollars.

Under the current practice of the Inland Revenue Department of Hong Kong, no tax is payable in Hong Kong in respect of dividends paid by Raytech Holding. See “Taxation - Hong Kong Profits Taxation.” on page 121 of this prospectus.

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth Raytech Holding’s capitalization as of September 30, 2024:

The pro forma information below is illustrative only, and our capitalization following the completion of this offering is subject to adjustment based on the actual net proceeds to us from the offering. You should read this capitalization table in conjunction with “Use of Proceeds” in this prospectus, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. 

DILUTION

If you invest in our Ordinary Shares in this offering, your interest will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the offering price per Ordinary Share you pay and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per Ordinary Share after this offering. Dilution results from the fact that the offering price per Ordinary Share is substantially in excess of the net tangible book value per Ordinary Share attributable to Raytech Holding’s existing shareholders for our presently issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares.

Raytech Holding’s net tangible book value as of September 30, 2024 was approximately $9,440,449, or $0.54 per Ordinary Share. Net tangible book value per Ordinary Share represents the amount of Raytech Holding’s total consolidated tangible assets, less the amount of our total consolidated liabilities, divided by the total number of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares outstanding as of September 30, 2024.

After giving further effect to Raytech Holding’s sale of 30,000,000 Ordinary Shares in this offering at a price $[●], and after deducting estimated offering expenses payable by Raytech Holding, Raytech Holding’s pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2024 is $[●], or $[●] per Ordinary Share. This represents an immediate increase in as adjusted net tangible book value per Ordinary Share of $[●] to our existing shareholders and an immediate dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per Ordinary Share of $[●] to new investors purchasing Ordinary Shares in this offering.

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per Ordinary Share basis.

To the extent that we issue additional Ordinary Shares in the future, there will be further dilution to new investors participating in this offering.

The following table summarizes, on an as adjusted basis as of September 30, 2024, the differences between existing shareholders and the new investors, the total consideration paid and the average price per Ordinary Share before deducting the estimated fees to the placement agent and the estimated offering expenses payable by Raytech Holding:

CORPORATE HISTORY AND STRUCTURE

Our Corporate History

Pure Beauty was incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong with limited liability on April 15, 2013 and Raytech Holding’s Chairman and CEO, Mr. Ching is the founder. In order to prepare for its initial public offering, a series of restructure actions were taken. In June 2022, Raytech Holding was incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands with the sole purpose being a holding company of Pure Beauty. Upon incorporation, Raytech Holding issued 100 founder shares of ordinary shares, par value $1.00 per share, to Mr. Ching (90 shares) and other minority shareholders (collectively 10 shares) at $1.00 per share. In August 2022, Mr. Ching, as the sole member of Pure Beauty, transferred all outstanding 10,000 shares of Pure Beauty held by him to Raytech Holding, in conjunction with which, Pure Beauty issued additional 790,000 shares to Raytech Holding; resulting in Raytech Holding being the parent company of Pure Beauty, holding a total of 800,000 shares in Pure Beauty. In September 2022, Mr. Ching subsequently transferred 5 shares of Raytech Holding to APTC Holdings Limited, a British Virgin Islands company, and 5 shares of Raytech Holding to Mr. Ling Chun Yin, a director of Raytech Holding and the Assistant to CEO of Pure Beauty at $1.00 per share.

On May 10, 2023, we filed our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association with the Registrar of Corporate Affairs in the British Virgin Islands to increase our authorized shares from 50,000 Ordinary Shares, par value of $1.00 per share, to 8,000,000,000 Ordinary Shares, par value of $0.00000625 per share and effectuated a forward split of all issued and outstanding shares at a ratio of 160,000-for-1.

In August 2023, Market Tycoon Investments Limited transferred 480,000 Ordinary Shares to Mr. Wong Tai Chi at $0.00000625 per share, and APTC Holdings Limited transferred 800,000 Ordinary Shares to Ms. Look Wai Yi at $0.00000625 per share. In October 2023, Value Classic Global Limited transferred 640,000 Ordinary Shares to Crystal Charm Investments Limited, a British Virgin Islands company, at $0.00000625 per share, Mr. Wong Tai Chi transferred 480,000 Ordinary Shares to Value Crystal Investment Limited, a British Virgin Islands company, at $0.00000625 per share, and Ms. Look Wai Yi transferred 800,000 Ordinary Shares to Ace Challenger Limited, a British Virgin Islands company, at $0.00000625 per share.

On May 17, 2024, we consummated the sale of 1,500,000 Ordinary Shares (the “IPO Shares”) in our initial public offering. The Company completed the IPO on a firm commitment basis pursuant to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No. 333-275197), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2024. The IPO Shares were priced at $4.00 per share. The Company also granted the underwriter a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 225,000 Ordinary Shares to cover over-allotments, if any (the “Over-Allotment Option”). The Ordinary Shares were approved for listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market on May 13, 2024 and commenced trading under the symbol “RAY” on May 15, 2024.

On July 5, 2024, upon the underwriter’s partial exercise of the Over-Allotment Option, the Company sold an additional 113,083 Ordinary Shares at $4.00 per share. As a result, the Company has raised gross proceeds of $6,452,332 in the IPO, including the partial exercise of the Over-Allotment Option, before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.

On May 6, 2025, the Company established a new, directly wholly-owned subsidiary, Raytech Innovation Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong. As of the date of this prospectus, Raytech Innovation Limited has not commenced operations and has no assets.

Corporate Structure

The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure as of the date of this prospectus:

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Raytech Holding’s consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion and analysis and other parts of this prospectus contain forward-looking statements based upon current beliefs, plans and expectations that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Raytech Holding’s actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should carefully read the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus to gain an understanding of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements.

Overview 

Leveraging our expertise in the personal care electrical appliance industry, we aim to promote consumer lifestyles and drive the awareness of personal grooming. Through Raytech Holding’s wholly-owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, Pure Beauty, we principally engage in the sourcing and wholesaling of personal care electrical appliances for international brand owners. We also provide product design and development collaboration as a value-added service for our customers. Our customers are brand owners of personal care electrical appliances who market and sell their personal care electrical appliances products to end consumers. Commencing our operation in 2013, we have accumulated over 10 years of experience in the industry.

Over years of operation, we have sourced and wholesaled a wide range of personal care electrical appliances, which can be broadly classified into six major categories: (i) hair styling series, including hair dryer, hair straightener and curling iron; (ii) trimmer series, including facial shaver, nose trimmer and eyebrow trimmer; (iii) eyelash curler; (iv) nail care series; (v) tooling; and (vi) other personal care appliance series, including body and facial brush, reset brush, callus remover, sonic peeling, handy fan and others. In particular, we are specialized in sourcing and wholesaling hair dryers within our hair styling series which primarily include salon-type hair protection and styling functions or compact design for travel.

Our customers are brand owners of personal care electrical appliances including, Koizumi Corporation Inc, one of the top 10 sellers in terms of retail volume in the personal care electrical appliance market in Japan as stated in “Personal Care Appliances in Japan” by Euromonitor International in December 2023. We maintain long term business relationships with our customers. Leveraging our substantial experience and expertise in the personal care electrical appliances industry, we believe we are well positioned to maintain our relationships with our current customers, and explore our market share in the U.S., Europe and other Asia markets in the near future.

Since our inception, our business has continued to generate revenues and positive profits. Our revenue increased significantly from HKD33,017,199 for the six months ended September 30, 2023 to HKD43,248,906 (US$5,566,641) for the six months ended September 30, 2024, representing an increase of 31.0%. Our net income decreased from HKD6,418,069 for the six months ended September 30, 2023 to HKD4,652,035 (US$598,771) for the six months ended September 30, 2024, representing a decrease of 27.5%, mainly due to an increase in IPO related professional expenses.

Key Factors that Affect Results of Operations 

Our results of operations have been and will continue to be affected by a number of factors, including those set out below:

Competition from other sellers in the market 

The personal care electric appliances sourcing market is relatively fragmented and competitive. We primarily compete with other sourcing offices in the industry and indirectly compete with manufacturers based in South Asia. We compete based on our product quality, research and development capabilities, established customer relationships and our experienced management team. Our current and future competitors may have longer operating histories, larger and more established customer bases, better manufacturer relationships, better supply chain capabilities, or greater financial, technical, or marketing resources than we do. Competitors may leverage their experience and resources to compete with us in a variety of ways, including investing more heavily in sales and marketing, adopting more aggressive pricing strategies, and making acquisitions for the expansion of their products. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, and such competition may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.

Our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers 

Our success depends on our ability to maintain good relationships with our existing customers and increase sales to them over time, as a significant amount of current net revenue is generated from sales to a limited number of existing customers. If we are unable to satisfy our existing customer needs in terms of product quality or service level, our business transactions with our customers may decline, and our operating results and financial conditions would be adversely impacted in a material manner.

In addition, our future success depends in part on our ability to attract new customers and continue to expand our customer base. In order to attract new customers, we must increase our investment in sales and marketing function across markets and recruit the right talent to drive the expansion efforts. Such investment and recruitment activities may not necessarily yield an increase in revenue, and even if they do, the expenses we will incur may more than offset any increase in revenue, which would harm our business, financial condition, and growth prospects.

Our ability to manage costs of raw materials or transportation 

Changes in the costs of raw materials or transportation indirectly affect our cost structure. Any increase in production costs may be passed on to us, but we might not be able to pass on all or any part of the subsequent increase in costs to our customers, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial performance. We do not have long-term contracts with third-party contract manufacturers and raw material vendors. We usually enter into fixed-price contracts with vendors and agree on raw materials pricing concurrently with our acceptance of each customer order, but in some cases a short time gap may be inevitable. Where market forces drive up raw material costs, we may from time to time fail to negotiate price terms that are advantageous to us and hence put pressure on our profit margin.

A downturn in general economic conditions  

The majority of our revenue was derived from sales to the Japanese consumer market, with future expansion strategies into the U.S., Europe and Asia market. In recent years, the global economic indicators have shown mixed signs, and the future growth of the economies are subject to many factors beyond our control. A downturn in the economy could adversely impact consumer purchases of discretionary items such as personal care electric appliances. Factors that could affect consumers’ willingness to make such discretionary purchases include general business conditions, levels of employment, interest rates and tax rates, the availability of consumer credit, and consumer confidence in future economic conditions. In the event of an economic downturn, we could experience lower than expected net sales, which could force us to delay or slow our growth strategy and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, profitability, and cash flow.

Economic, political and social conditions in mainland China and Hong Kong, as well as its government policies, laws and regulations 

Our key operations are in Hong Kong. However, due to the long arm provisions under the current laws and regulations of mainland China, the PRC government may exercise significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business and may intervene in or influence our operations at any time, which could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of Raytech Holding’s Ordinary Shares. Accordingly, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations may be influenced to a significant degree by the political, economic, and social conditions in the PRC generally and by the continued economic growth in mainland China as a whole. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects are, to a significant degree, subject to economic, political, and legal developments in the PRC.

Hong Kong is a special administrative region of the PRC and the basic policies of the PRC regarding Hong Kong are reflected in the Basic Law, namely, Hong Kong’s constitutional document, which provides Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy and executive, legislative and independent judicial powers, including that of final adjudication under the principle of “one country, two systems”. However, there is no assurance that there will not be any changes in the economic, political, and legal environment in Hong Kong in the future. Since our operation is based in Hong Kong, any change of such political arrangements may pose immediate threat to the stability of the economy in Hong Kong, thereby directly and adversely affecting our results of operations and financial positions.

Results of Operations

For the Six Months ended September 30, 2024, compared to Six Months Ended September 30, 2023

The following table sets forth a summary of the consolidated results of operations of us for the periods indicated, both in absolute amount and as a percentage of its total revenues.

Revenue

For the six months ended September 30, 2023, and 2024, we generated our revenue primarily through sales of personal care products.

Our revenue increased by 31.0% to HKD43,248,906 (US$5,566,641) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 from HKD33,017,199 for the six months ended September 30, 2023. The increase was principally driven by an increase in sales in our trimmer series within our personal care products, which are mostly driven by engaging new customers.

For the six months ended September 30, 2023, and 2024, we generated significant sales to our two key customers. These customers are a Japanese corporation and a multi-national corporation, respectively, both with established global brands across a myriad of sectors, including but not limited to, beauty, audio and electric cooking and home appliances.

Merchandise costs

The following table shows segregated merchandise costs by major cost items for the six months ended September 30, 2023 and 2024, respectively:

Our merchandise costs increased by 40.3% to HKD34,100,724 (US$4,389,163) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 from HKD24,305,564 for the six months ended September 30, 2023. The increase was in line with our increase in sales of products.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

For the six months ended September 30, 2023 and 2024, our selling, general and administrative expenses consisted of staff costs, rental expenses, transport and travelling, selling and marketing, depreciation, legal and professional fees and auditor’s remuneration. The following table sets forth a breakdown of our selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2023 and 2024:

Staff costs

Our staff costs increased by 1,123.4% to HKD1,659,978 (US$213,659) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 from HKD135,684 for the six months ended September 30, 2023 mainly due to an increase in salaries and the addition of compensation fees for audit committee members.

Rental expenses

Our rental expenses mainly represented rental expenses for Hong Kong office. Our rental and office expenses were HKD150,000 and HKD150,000 (US$19,307) for the six months ended September 30, 2023 and 2024, respectively.

Transport and travelling

For the six months ended September 30, 2023, and 2024, our transport and travelling consisted of motor vehicle running cost, travel and communication expenses and other travel related expenses. Our transport and travelling expenses increased by 104.1%, primarily due to an increase in business travel for professional parties relating to the IPO.

Selling and marketing

For the six months ended September 30, 2023 and 2024, our selling and marketing expenses decreased by 73.6% from HKD46,167 for the six months ended September 30, 2023 to HKD12,206 (US$1,571) for the six months ended September 30, 2024. The decrease was principally driven by lower marketing expenses.

Depreciation

Our depreciation mainly represented depreciation for our property and equipment. Our depreciation for our property and equipment decreased from HKD54,214 for the six months ended September 30, 2023 to nil for the six months ended September 30, 2024 due to our property and equipment having fully depreciated.

Legal and professional fees

Our legal and professional fees increased by 22287.4% to HKD1,187,649 (US$152,864) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 from HKD5,305 for the six months ended September 30, 2023, primarily due to an increase in IPO-related expenses, such as service fees for legal counsel and investor relations service provider.

Others

Our other general and administrative expenses mainly consisted of bank charges, cleaning charges, courier and postage, insurance, printing and stationery and other miscellaneous expenses. Our other general and administrative expenses increased to HKD73,473 (US$9,457) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 from HKD68,788 for the six months ended September 30, 2023 due primarily to an increase in bank charges.

Income from operations and margin

Our overall income from operations decreased by 43.7% to HKD3,918,723 (US$504,385) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 from HKD6,960,104 for the six months ended September 30, 2023, primarily due to the increase in IPO-related expenses. Our overall gross profit margin decreased by 5.2% to 21.2% for the six months ended September 30, 2024 from 26.4% for the six months ended September 30, 2023, primarily due to the lower margin profiles for a new customer and fewer sales of tooling.

Provision for income tax expense

Our income tax expenses amounted to HKD290,920 (US$37,445) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 and amounted to HKD1,139,449 for the six months ended September 30, 2023. We are subject only to the Hong Kong corporate tax regime. Starting with the fiscal year commencing on April 1, 2018, the two-tiered profits tax regime in Hong Kong took effect, under which the tax rate is 8.25% for assessable profits on the first HKD2,000,000 profit generated by the Company in a fiscal year and 16.5% for any assessable portion of our profits exceeding HKD2,000,000 in a fiscal year.

Net income

Our net income decreased by 27.5% to HKD4,652,035 (US$598,771) for the six months ended September 30, 2024 as compared to HKD6,418,069 for the six months ended September 30, 2023. The decrease in net income was predominantly due to an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses.

For the year ended March 31, 2023 compared to year ended March 31, 2024

The following table sets forth a summary of the consolidated results of operations of us for the periods indicated, both in absolute amount and as a percentage of our total revenues.