Exhibit (q)(8)

Contents

Proxy Voting

Reynders, McVeigh Capital Management believes that proxy voting and shareholder dialogue are vital paths in sharing our clients’ values with the management of the companies in which they invest. Our investment discipline is based on identifying companies that exhibit both potential for financial returns and positive ESG footprints. We believe incorporating the latter mitigates risks and upholds the highest fiduciary standard for our clients. As proactive investors, we believe that it is our responsibility to leverage our voices by engaging with corporate leaders directly, voting our clients’ proxies, submitting shareholder proposals, participating in industry peer groups and networks, and fostering dialogue with our community.

We vote our clients’ proxies in line with our Proxy Voting Guidelines (“Proxy Guidelines”), which we believe are progressive and call companies to action. Our Proxy Guidelines consistently take ESG considerations into account. They consider how environmental, social, and governance matters are integrated into corporate strategy, as well as the economic viability of capital markets for the long term.

We seek authorization to vote proxies on behalf of all clients, to the extent that the client’s custodian provides access to proxy voting by advisers. Clients may opt out of this service by providing a written request to the Firm. A client may direct the Firm’s vote of that client’s shares in a particular solicitation by submitting a timely, written request to the Firm. We review and may revise the Proxy Guidelines annually. We engage a third-party provider to assist with the administration of proxy voting on behalf of all clients who have not explicitly opted out of this service.

Our Proxy Guidelines aim to ensure that we vote in the best interest of our clients and address material conflicts that arise during the voting process. We recognize that proxy proposals may present a conflict between the interests of clients and those of the Firm or certain of its affiliates. If a conflict is identified, our Shareholder Engagement Manager shall notify Firm management as soon as possible so that a voting decision may be made in a timely manner. If the matter to be voted on is covered by our Proxy Guidelines, the proxy will be voted in accordance with that policy. If the matter is not specifically addressed in our Proxy Guidelines, the Shareholder Engagement Manager shall vote in line with the our sustainable investment strategy.

Given the dynamic and wide-ranging nature of corporate governance issues that may arise, the Proxy Guidelines are not intended to be exhaustive, and we may recommend a departure from specific aspects of the Proxy Guidelines when it deems such a departure to be in the client’s best interest.

PROXY VOTING PROCESS

ADVISORY CLIENT PROXY VOTING PROCESS

Unless otherwise directed by the client in writing, the Firm votes proxies on behalf of all clients to the extent that the clients’ custodians provide access to the proxy voting by advisers. The client’s customer account name and title of the account appear on all votes made by the Firm. We vote proxies on companies both on and off our Approved Securities List. Legacy holdings and client directed positions are reasons that we would vote proxies on companies that we do not recommend to clients. We believe this provides a unique opportunity to engage with companies outside our purview to make a larger impact in the corporate space, specifically in areas that need improvement on ESG factors.

THE REYNDERS, MCVEIGH CORE EQUITY FUND (TICKER: ESGEX)

PROXY VOTING PROCESS

Mutual fund clients are automatically opted into proxy voting. Companies that are in the mutual fund are actively monitored and discussed in a weekly investment committee meeting, where we incorporate shareholder engagement information into our bottom-up research. Shares that are voted on appear as “Reynders, McVeigh Core Equity Fund” rather than clients’ individual names.

REPORTING AND TRANSPARENCY

REGULATORY REPORTING OF PROXY VOTES

The Firm recognizes that if it has investment company clients, such clients are required by Rule 30b1-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to file Form N-PX¹, which is required to contain the Firm’s proxy voting record. To the extent requested by clients, Firm personnel shall assist with:

DISCLOSURE OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR VOTING PROXIES

The Firm recognizes that it is required by Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to disclose to clients its proxy voting policies and procedures and, upon request, furnish a copy of the policies and procedures. Therefore, the Firm has adopted the following procedures:

Disclosure in Part 2A of Form ADV

A brief description of these procedures shall be included in Part 2A of the Firm’s Form ADV.

Delivery of Procedures Upon Contract

If a client engages the Firm to vote proxies in connection with or related to meetings of shareholders of issuers represented in the client’s portfolio, the client (a) shall be provided a copy of these procedures, and (b) shall sign an acknowledgement, which may be included in the client’s investment management agreement with the Firm, that the Firm has been engaged to vote proxies on behalf of the client.

VOTING GUIDELINES

The guidelines below outline how the Firm will vote proxies for clients. The guidelines are not exhaustive and are not meant to serve as a strict limitation on voting. Corporate governance matters are ever-changing and wide-ranging, and the Firm approaches proxy voting with this in mind. When specific questions arise, the Firm relies on guidance from the Shareholder Engagement Manager in consultation with the Chief Compliance Officer and upper management.

GENERAL PROXY VOTING POSITIONS

In addition to fundamental analysis, we incorporate environmental, social, and governance factors into our research process and shareholder engagement. As a socially responsible investing firm, we leverage our collective voices through proxy voting to push to companies to improve their business operations and be better corporate players. The transparency that comes from companies reporting on material ESG issues allows us to better understand the risks and opportunities of the companies and industries that we invest in, thereby allowing us to make better informed investment decisions. Environmental issues include issues related to climate change, like conserving natural resources and reducing harmful emissions. Material social issues include issues related to human capital management, such as fair treatment of employees, diversity, equity and inclusion of the workforce, human rights, and extending rights to suppliers. Best practices in governance issues include policies related to compensation, transparency, diversity, decision-making and ethics and shareholder rights.

CONFIDENTIAL VOTING & SHAREHOLDER ACTIONS

The Firm believes that proxy voting systems should provide shareholders with better access to management. With this in mind, the Firm tends to vote in favor of shareholder resolutions requesting that corporations adopt policies for confidential voting and the use of independent inspectors of elections.

The Firm generally opposes any measures that would restrict the right of any shareholder to act by written consent or to call a special meeting.

POISON PILLS & GOLDEN PARACHUTES

The Firm believes that the shareholders of a corporation should have the right to vote upon decisions in which there is a real or potential conflict between the interests of shareholders and those of management. As such, the Firm will vote in favor of shareholder proposals requesting that a corporation submit a “poison pill”² for shareholder ratification. The Firm will examine, on a case-by-case basis, shareholder proposals to redeem a poison pill and management proposals to ratify a poison pill. Also, on a case-by-case basis, the Firm will vote in favor of proposals requiring that “golden parachute”³ proposals be submitted for shareholder approval. The Firm will vote against a poison pill or golden parachute that was not approved by shareholders.

GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

Election of Directors

The Firm believes that one of the primary rights of a shareholder is the right to vote for the election of directors. While the Firm prefers that all members of the board of directors stand for election at least annually, the Firm will vote against a classified or “staggered board.”⁴ We believe voting annually for all board members achieves greater accountability to shareholders. In instances where there have not been new board members elected in the last five years, we will vote against directors who have been on the board for 10 years or more.

The Firm believes the primary duty of the board of directors is to oversee management on behalf of, and in the interest of, shareholders. To assure that the company is being managed in a manner that safeguards the owners’ interests and assets, rather than the managers’ own interests, the Firm will vote for proposals that reflect the long-term goals of shareholders and that align the interests of board members more closely with the interests of shareholders.

The Firm believes in strong competence at the director level. To improve diversity where boards are overly homogeneous, the Firm will vote for a board of directors in which women and minorities represent at least 20% of the board. When there are no female or minority board members, the Firm will vote against all current members of the board who are standing for re-election. The Firm will vote in favor of additional disclosure during the board nomination process, including the current percentage of racial/ethnic diversity, skills disclosure, and policies requiring women and minorities to be included in the initial pool of candidates when selecting new nominees (a.k.a. the “Rooney Rule”⁵). To ensure the number of directors is appropriate for the commitment required for board service, the Firm will typically vote in favor of chief executive officers that sit on two or fewer public boards and non-chief executive officers that sit on six or fewer public boards, should these matters be up for election.

Board Independence

The Firm believes that a board of directors will be most effective in protecting shareholders’ interests if at least two-thirds are independent. We define independence as owning less than 20% of a company’s outstanding shares. The Firm votes for an independent chairman of the board and for independent board members involved in the audit, compensation, nominating, and governance committees. The Firm believes that independent members with diverse backgrounds and the required skills can provide better informed judgments about the issues at hand than a homogeneous board of directors.

The Firm believes the number of board members indicates the level of commitment and involvement in adhering to long-term goals. The Firm will vote in favor of more than five or less than 20 board members. This enables diversity in decision making, but also does not create difficulty in reaching consensus.

Employee Relations & Compensation

The Firm believes that accountability requires transparency. In the interest of transparency, the Firm votes for proposals requesting that companies review and report on executive compensation. The Firm votes against inflated executive pay, affirming proposals that limit CEO compensation to, at or below the 75th percentile of peers, and for a CEO to median employee ratio that is higher than 400:1. Additionally, the Firm will vote for proposals requesting shareholder votes on retirement and severance packages.

The Firm believes that a company builds long-term value by maintaining high levels of workforce productivity, engaging workers and community stakeholders in innovation and new business strategies, and enhancing the corporate reputation for good corporate citizenship. The Firm will therefore vote for the establishment of any stock options, stock ownership, and performance incentive programs that include all tenured employees. The Firm will also vote in favor of adequate living wages for all employees, adjusted for geographic concerns.

The Firm believes all employees, from executives to hourly workers, should abstain from hedging the economic risk associated with their share ownership in the company. This creates a misalignment of the company’s long-term values. Further, the Firm votes against any practices related to option hedging: backdating any purchases of shares, “spring loading,”⁶ or “bullet dodging.”⁷ These are a direct breach of a fiduciary duty by any employee, executive, or director to the shareholders. This includes repricing underwater options for stock, cash, and other considerations.

Say on Pay

The Firm will vote against “say on pay”⁸ proposals, which ask investors to vote on the compensation of top company executives, without a clearly stated provision on frequency of voting.

Voting Rights

The Firm believes that each shareholder should have equal voting rights. Thus, the Firm will vote against dual-class voting and other unequal voting structures, and the Firm will vote for cumulative stockholder voting for directors and for proposals that give shareholders rights to call special meetings. This eliminates the power of the board or officers to change the governance structure or amend bylaws or charters without shareholder approval.

The Firm believes that all shareholders should have the same rights and opportunities to participate in virtual-only meetings as they would at in-person meetings. The Firm sees the benefits of convening share- holder meetings virtually, including convenience and accessibility, and will generally vote for allowing them if they do not prevent in-person meetings or limit access for shareholders in any way. The Firm will vote on a case-by-case basis, considering the scope and rationale of the proposal and virtual attendees’ ability to be able to raise issues of concern.

Policy on Shareholder Engagement

The Firm believes open communication with shareholders is critical. Thus, the Firm will vote for communication structures that allow shareholders to effectively communicate with members of the board.

Fair Price Amendments

The Firm believes that “fair price amendments”⁹ can protect shareholders from coercive and discriminatory tender offers. The Firm will generally vote in favor of fair price provisions and in favor of other measures that will protect shareholders from coercive takeover bids, which do not provide for the fair and equal treatment of all shareholders.

Target Share Payments

The Firm believes that shareholders should have the right to vote on the placement of blocks of a corporation’s stock in the hands of persons friendly to management. Accordingly, the Firm will vote in favor of shareholder proposals that request that corporations first obtain shareholder authorization before issuing any significant amount of voting stock (whether common or preferred), rights, warrants, or securities convertible into voting stock to any person or group.

Tender Offers

The Firm believes that shareholders should have the right to vote on placements that could enable management of a corporation to defeat a tender offer that may be in the best interests of shareholders. The Firm will consider tender offers on a case-by-case basis.

SUSTAINABILITY & ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES

The Firm believes management practices that address sustainability are necessary to combat the devastating effects of climate change, and to provide a good foundation on which to build long-term financial value. To promote these practices, the Firm will vote for board oversight of sustainability strategies and performance, including long-term strategic planning and risk management. Further, the Firm will vote in favor of management accountability for sustainability goals, and it will vote for internal and public policies to reflect these goals.

The Firm believes that one measure of a company’s commitment to a long-term value creation strategy is its adoption of environmental policies and principles. The Firm will vote for the adoption and disclosure of specific environmental policies, plans, and performance, along with day-to-day performance goals and measurements to be used by the company. Goals that the Firm will vote for include: disclosures concerning greenhouse gases and other hazardous and non-hazardous waste, reporting on energy efficiency plans and renewable energy, proposals that ask companies to report on their recycling efforts and adopt a formal policy, corporate investments in environmental policies and plans, and increased disclosure and reporting regarding animal treatment issues.

Environmental and Sustainability Reporting

The Firm will vote in favor of proposals for reports using the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) Sustainability Reporting Standards¹⁰, the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (“CERES”) Principles¹¹, Equator Principles (“EPs”)¹², United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (“UN SDGs”)¹³, and all sustainability reporting that enhances disclosure of the company’s environmental practices and/or environmental risks and liabilities. This information provides shareholders with insight into the financial, physical, or regulatory risks the company faces related to climate change in its operations and investments, or how the company identifies, measures, and manages such risks.

The Firm will vote for proposals calling for a reduction of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) or adoption of GHG goals in products and operations, as well as proposals supporting disclosure of the use of renewable energy sources and goals to increase this.

Natural Resource Use

The Firm will vote against the excessive use of harmful chemicals and chlorine bleaching in manufacturing and industrial processes.

The Firm will vote for campaigns that promote the human right to water as articulated by the United Nations, reporting and adoption of policies for limited and clean water use and disposal, and reporting on the risk of excessive water usage at companies and in their supply chains.

Health and Safety of Employees and Consumers

The Firm believes the safety of employees during the production of goods and services leads to greater long-term value in the company. The Firm will vote in favor of workplace safety, accident risk reduction efforts, and consumer product safety policies and initiatives.

Healthy Food and Agricultural Systems

The Firm believes that food production and consumption is an environmental and social issue. The Firm will vote in favor of shareholder proposals that seek increased reporting and transparency on related issues, like deforestation, plastic use, water consumption, and pollution. Specifically, the Firm will vote for proposals that prohibit deforestation practices and aim to reduce plastic consumption and pollution.

SOCIAL PRINCIPLES

Adherence to Internationally Recognized Labor and Human Rights Standards

The Firm believes businesses that protect and uphold labor and human rights in their operations and throughout their supply chain will build long-term value in the company and create a more just world for employees and consumers alike. The Firm will therefore vote for resolutions that call for the implementation and independent compliance monitoring of International Labour Organization (“ILO”)¹⁴ Standards, Global Sullivan Principles (“GSP”)¹⁵ and United Nations standards. In addition, the Firm will vote for resolutions requesting that boards oversee labor and human rights practices and report to shareholders on such practices, including worker health and safety practices, compensation practices, and non-discrimination and workplace diversity practices.

The Firm will vote for proposals on disclosure and transparency of companies’ operations in oppressive regimes that are known to be violating human rights. The Firm believes reporting can help uncover the likelihood of people, community, and product abuse.

The Firm will vote for adopting policies, transparency, and assessments around forced labor and prison labor risks in its supply chain and will support efforts to end all forms of forced labor.

The Firm will vote against proposals and ownership of companies operating with substantial involvement in pornography, gambling, and for-profit incarceration.

Corporate Practices Involving Public Health and Product Safety

The Firm believes that high corporate standards and transparency around public health issues and product safety issues will enhance a company’s long-term value. The Firm will therefore vote for shareholder proposals asking for reports on the financial, legal, and operational risks posed by the use of products and services that may impact public health or product safety; for shareholder proposals asking for the adoption of product safety policies; and for resolutions calling for the study, adoption, or implementation of product safety programs in the company’s supply chain.

The Firm will vote for proposals for incentives to encourage suppliers to raise standards rather than terminate contracts, and provide public disclosure of contract supplier reviews on a regular basis.

Further, the Firm will vote for proposals to adopt labor standards for foreign and domestic suppliers to ensure the company will not do business with foreign suppliers that manufacturer products for sale in the U.S. using forced labor or child labor, or that fail to comply with applicable laws protecting employee wages and working conditions.

The Firm will vote for proposals requesting disclosure of Internet privacy and censorship policies and procedures, and implementation of Internet privacy policies and procedures.

Lobbying and Political Contributions

The Firm believes that a company’s lobbying, political activities, and trade association memberships should be aligned with its corporate strategy to ensure that the corporation operates under the political and regulatory frameworks that support the creation of long-term value for all stakeholders. For this reason, the Firm will vote for proposals asking for disclosure on company guidelines and practices regarding political activities, including political contributions, political lobbying, and trade association spending. The Firm will vote in favor of policies that seek to eliminate direct corporate political giving to any candidate, regardless of political party.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Human Capital

The Firm believes that workplace equity is a material issue and companies with diversity across gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and other protected classes create better teams, promote new ideas, and attract and retain the best and brightest employees. The Firm will vote for the disclosure of equal opportunity (EEO-1) data regarding diversity in the workforce, and for the independent auditing of employee pay among people of color, women, transgender and non-binary individuals. The Firm will vote for increased reporting on the effectiveness of DEI programs and for proposals that seek to set specific goals to increase gender and racial diversity in all areas of the business, particularly at the senior level. The Firm will vote for proposals asking companies to adopt nomination charters or amend existing charters to include reasonable language addressing diversity.

The Firm encourages ending systematic racism and its economic impact on people who are Black, Indigenous, and people of color (“BIPOC”). On an industry-specific case-by-case basis, we will support “Ban the Box” shareholder resolutions since BIPOC are disproportionally arrested, convicted, and incarcerated. The Firm will vote in favor for shareholder proposals seeking more careful consideration of advertising campaigns regarding use of racial stereotypes.

The Firm will vote for proposals for company initiatives that will create a workplace that is free of discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, race, ethnicity, immigration status, ability, age, religion, and/or country of origin. The Firm will also vote in favor of policies strengthening the prevention of workplace sexual harassment. This may include reporting on the use of mandatory arbitration and/or use of non-disclosure language.

The Firm will vote for proposals for companies to report on the impact of their operations on Indigenous people’s rights on a case-by-case basis. This may include adopting a policy around Indigenous people’s rights when reviewing potential acquisitions, extractive and infrastructure operations, and the impacts on indigenous territories.

CONFLICTS

The Firm recognizes that proxy proposals may present a conflict between the interests of clients and those of the Firm or certain of its affiliates. Therefore, the Firm has adopted the following conflict procedures.

Identifying Conflicts

The person assigned responsibility for voting proxies shall, when reviewing proxy materials, identify conflicts of interest including, but not limited to:

The person assigned responsibility for voting proxies shall advise Firm management of companies soliciting proxies, and management shall advise if there are any known conflicts including, but not limited to, the conflicts listed in the preceding paragraph.

Disclosing Conflicts

If a conflict is identified, the person assigned to vote proxies shall notify the Firm’s management as soon as possible so that a voting decision may be made in a timely manner.

Voting Decisions in Conflict Situations

When there is a conflict of interest, the person assigned to vote proxies will vote in the manner prescribed by the Guidelines. If the guidelines do not address the matter to be voted on, the Firm will contact the client or the client’s designated representative for voting instructions.

Record of Voting Instructions

The person or entity responsible for voting proxies shall record and maintain records reflecting client voting instructions on matters where there are conflicts.

Abstaining Votes

The Firm will abstain from voting on issues when there is not enough information available or the information available is vague and leaves unanswered questions.

VOTING RECORDS

The Firm recognizes its obligations to maintain records as required by Rule 204-2(c)(2) under the Advisers Act. Therefore, the Firm has adopted the following record-keeping procedure:

PERSON RESPONSIBLE

The Shareholder Engagement Manager, or their designee, will prepare and maintain the files and records required by the Proxy Guidelines.

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

A copy of all policies and procedures related to proxy voting adopted by the Firm shall be maintained in an appropriately labeled file for the term required by regulatory authorities.

PROXY STATEMENTS

A record of all proxy statements with respect to securities held in client portfolios for which the Firm has agreed to vote proxies shall be maintained in the form of an Excel (or similar) spreadsheet. Hard copies of the proxy statements shall not be maintained in Firm files; instead, the Firm shall rely on obtaining a copy of a proxy statement from the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system.

PROXY VOTING RECORD

The third-party provider initiated to administer voting will be responsible for creating reports on how the proxies were voted and on the results of each ballot. The Firm’s Compliance department shall review proxy ballots after votes have been cast to ensure third-party provider voting is in line with the Firm’s Proxy Guidelines.

The Reynders, McVeigh Shareholder Engagement Manager, or their designee, will maintain a record for all manual voting, in the form of an Excel (or similar) spreadsheet, for each matter relating to a portfolio security considered at any shareholder meeting at which clients are entitled to vote. This record will include the following:

MEMORANDA

In addition to the records required as set forth above, the person or team assigned responsibility for voting proxies shall maintain a copy of documents created by the Firm personnel that were material to the voting decision.

REQUEST FOR DATA

When appropriate, the Firm shall maintain a copy of each written client request for the Firm’s voting record on behalf of the client and a copy of each written response, including a copy of a formatted voting record. The report shall be mailed to the client within a reasonable time upon receipt of the request.

DISCLOSURES

The Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) are proprietary to Reynders, McVeigh Capital Management, LLC (“RMCM’’) and should not be distributed to any third party without RMCM’s prior consent. The Guidelines are provided for informational purposes only. The Guidelines are intended to provide an understanding of the proxy voting process at RMCM and how RMCM votes proxies. The Guidelines do not constitute investment advice, and the Guidelines are not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities managed by RMCM and may not be relied upon in connection with any offer or sale of securities.

Receipt of the Guidelines does not create an adviser-client relationship, and RMCM is not acting in a fiduciary capacity when distributing the Guidelines outside any established adviser-client relationship. The Guidelines do not consider the reader’s particular financial needs, investment objectives, strategies, tax status, risk tolerance or investment horizon. The reader should consult their own independent advice in relation to any investment, financial, legal, tax, accounting or regulatory issues discussed herein.

10 Post Office Sq., Ste N1010, Boston, MA 02109

(p) 617.226.9999

(f) 617.226.9998

reyndersmcveigh.com

@ReyndersMcVeigh