a)	Conflict Minerals Policy Statement

The Company has adopted the following Conflict- Minerals Policy Statement, which is publicly available on our website at https://us.pg.com/policies-and-practices/conflict-free-materials/:

We're committed to ensuring that we are not sourcing minerals (tin, tantalum, tungsten, gold) that fund armed groups in the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. We do not ban sourcing of minerals from this region because such a policy may harm legitimate miners.

We’re taking steps across our entire supply chain to confirm our sourcing does not fund armed groups in the DRC and adjoining countries. As part of this program, we continue to carry out a reasonable country of origin inquiry on the products we manufacture and perform supply chain due diligence following the processes and procedures set forth in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. Our Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer is responsible for the efforts of this team.

We expect suppliers to have a policy in place and implement a system to trace the origin of tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold supplied to the Company, following the template developed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative. Suppliers are encouraged to report any ethical concerns or policy violations, as outlined at https://pgsupplier.com/en-US/png-values/report-a-concern. This reporting mechanism is operated by a third-party supplier to help ensure anonymity.

If any external business partner has challenges in complying with our expectation, we'll attempt to work to address these challenges. If compliance cannot be achieved, we will terminate the relationship with the external business partner.

b)	Internal Management Systems and Controls

In order to facilitate our compliance with the Rule, the Company created a multi-functional core team (“Core Team”), which includes representatives from Purchases, Product Supply, Sustainability, Research & Development, Finance & Accounting, Global Business Services, Corporate Communications, Corporate Compliance, and Legal. The Core Team designed an extensive Conflict Minerals Program, including, but not limited to, processes for supply chain review, supplier and employee outreach, due diligence, and risk management. Our Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer is responsible for the efforts of the Core Team.

ii)	Control Systems

As a downstream company, the Company does not generally have a direct relationship with mines from which mineral ores are extracted, or with 3TG smelters and refiners or other upstream participants. Consequently, we have engaged with other companies through trade associations and industry initiatives, such as the Responsible Business Alliance-Global e-Sustainability Initiative’s (“RBA-GeSI”) Responsible Minerals Initiative (“RMI”), to improve transparency with respect to smelters and other upstream participants in the Conflict Minerals supply chain.

In addition to our Conflict Minerals Policy, our work is governed by:

c)	Identify and Assess Risks in the Supply Chain

The breadth and complexity of our supply chain creates a challenge in identifying all parties who are upstream from our direct suppliers. Therefore, we must rely on our direct suppliers to provide information on the source and chain of custody of the 3TG contained in components and materials supplied to us, including sources of 3TG that are supplied to them from smelters and refiners (collectively, “smelters”) further upstream in the supply chain.

Our due diligence measures have been designed to conform, in all material respects, with the portions of the OECD Guidance applicable to a “downstream company.”

a)	Survey Requests

The Company used the Template to conduct a survey of its direct suppliers that we determined potentially supplied components or materials containing 3TG, or our in-scope suppliers. The Template was developed by the RMI to facilitate disclosure and communication of information regarding a company’s supply chain and includes questions regarding the supplier’s conflict-free policy, the recipient’s engagement with its direct suppliers, and the smelters from which the suppliers (and its suppliers) source minerals. In addition, the Template contains questions about the origin of any 3TG provided by the supplier, as well as the supplier’s due diligence. Written instructions and recorded training illustrating the use of the tool are available on the RMI website.

For 2024, we asked the in-scope suppliers to provide updated Templates or report no change to Templates previously provided to us.

b)	Survey Responses

The Company has received Templates, in response to the current or prior surveys, or updated information from 58 of the 60 suppliers surveyed. Members of the Core Team have reviewed these responses for completeness and to determine if any potential red flags were present, in accordance with the requirements of our Conflict Minerals Program, and followed up as needed with suppliers to clarify responses.

The responses we received included varying degrees of information regarding the names and locations of 3TG smelters from which each supplier sourced minerals and whether these smelters supplied minerals that were actually used in components supplied to the Company. Some suppliers included smelter data for 3TG that we know is contained in components and materials supplied to us. For this group of smelters, which we refer to as the “known smelters” in our supply chain, we then reviewed whether the supplier indicated that the relevant smelters in its supply chain may have sourced 3TG from a Covered Country. For those suppliers reporting that the smelters in their supply chain may have sourced 3TG from a Covered Country, we analyzed and compared the known smelters against the list of facilities that have

received a “conformant” designation through the RMI’s Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (“RMAP”) as of May 9, 2025. Of the 93 known smelters that suppliers reported may have sourced 3TG from the Covered Countries, 84 are designated as conformant with RMAP by RMI. The conformant known smelters are listed in Attachment A. While we have no indication that any of our remaining suppliers are sourcing from any smelters that source from the Covered Countries, we necessarily rely on the accuracy of the reporting from our suppliers on the sourcing practices of the various smelters in their supply chain, which, in turn, relies on the accuracy of the smelters’ own reporting, and we have insufficient data at this time to validate the status of any other smelters or refiners.

c)

Reporting

The Company has filed this Conflict Minerals Report for 2024 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We have also made this report available on our website at https://us.pg.com/policies-and-practices/conflict-free-materials/.

As a downstream company, we rely upon our suppliers and independent assessment programs to provide upstream information such as whether the mine or location of origin is in a Covered Country, and whether smelters sourcing from Covered Countries have employed policies, practices and procedures to source these minerals in a manner that is conflict free. RMI has developed an audit protocol for verification of entities as conformant with the RMAP in accordance with the OECD Guidance and in conjunction with complementary traceability schemes in the Covered Countries. The RMAP conformant list is composed of entities that have undergone the third-party audit of the smelters' company-level management processes for responsible mineral procurement. In the case of gold refiners, this audit process may rely, in part, on applicable audit and related processes established by the London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) and Responsible Jewelry Council (“RJC”), in accordance with a cross-recognition policy adopted by RMI, LBMA, and RJC.

Our efforts to determine the mine or location of origin of necessary Conflict Minerals with the greatest possible specificity consisted primarily of a review of whether our suppliers reported that the smelters in their supply chain sourced their minerals from the Covered Countries. Where the supplier reported that a smelter may have sourced minerals from a Covered Country, we compared the list of smelters to the RMAP conformant smelter list. As of May 9, 2025, approximately 90% of the known smelters that were reported by our suppliers as potentially sourcing from a Covered Country appear on the RMAP conformant list.

To further mitigate the risk that any Conflict Minerals in our products could finance or benefit armed groups, we are making the following commitments:

ATTACHMENT A
RMAP Conformant Smelters

The following facilities are listed by RMI as a RMAP conformant smelter or refiner and have been reported to us by our suppliers as part of their supply chain for components and materials known to contain Conflict Minerals that may be sourced from a Covered Country. The facility names are listed as they appear on the RMI smelter list. Our supply chain includes other known smelters that our suppliers report may source 3TG from the Covered Countries, but that are not RMAP conformant.