Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes to Financial Statements | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments Disclosure [Text Block] |
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to claims and lawsuits related to the normal course of business operations. When the Company determines that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable, a liability representing the best estimate of the Company’s financial exposure is recorded. Actual losses may materially differ from the Company’s estimates. With respect to our title insurance operations, this customary litigation includes but is not limited to a wide variety of cases arising out of or related to title and escrow claims, for which we make provisions through our loss reserves. See Note 5, Reserve for Title Claims, for further information. None of these claims and lawsuits, in management’s opinion, will have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Litigation
The Company’s subsidiaries are parties to legal actions incidental to their business. As of March 31, 2025, management believed that the resolution of these matters would not materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Omega Litigation
During the fourth quarter of 2024, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, Omega, was served with litigation in the Circuit Court in and for Charlotte County, Florida. The case, instituted by ABL RPC Residential Credit Acquisition, LLC, is a mortgage foreclosure action filed against multiple parties including the borrower, the current UCC lien holder, the current owners of the collateralized properties, and unknown tenants of the properties (collectively “Defendants”). Two of the Defendants, 760 Anatalya Holding LLC and 562 Monaco Holding LLC (“Anatalya and Monaco”), through their majority owners, filed Affirmative Defenses and Counter Claims in the foreclosure action alleging a count of negligence against Omega and naming Omega as a Third-Party Defendant. Anatalya and Monaco allege that Omega was negligent in conducting the closing of the mortgage transaction when Omega allowed the Manager of Anatalya and Monaco to execute all documents on their behalf including deeds transferring the properties into the name of the borrowing entity. Omega has retained outside counsel. The Company believes it is unlikely that the case will result in a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Citibank Foreclosure Against Unrelated Third Party
On May 13, 2024, the Company was served with a foreclosure action filed by Citibank, N.A., primarily against two individually named defendants. The Company was identified as a co-defendant in this matter as the Company has a recorded judgment against one of the primary defendants. The Company has retained outside counsel in this matter in efforts to preserve any claim the Company may have to said recorded judgment against the primary defendant. Given the posture of the litigation, management does not believe this matter will result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Omega Employee Litigation
During the first quarter of 2024, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, Omega, became involved in litigation in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The case, instituted by a former Omega employee, alleges that the former employee was separated from Omega in a manner inconsistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Florida Civil Rights Act. Omega entered into a settlement agreement to resolve all counts against Omega effective March 28, 2025. The monetary amount conveyed under the settlement agreement did not result in a material adverse effect to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Leases
Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to operating leases under ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC Topic 842”), are recorded when the Company and its subsidiaries are party to a contract, which conveys the right for it to control an asset for a specified period of time. Substantially all of our operating lease arrangements relate to rented office space and real estate for our title operations. The Company is not a party to any material contracts considered finance leases. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities under ASC Topic 842 are recorded as Lease assets and Lease liabilities, respectively, on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company’s operating leases range in term from to years. As of March 31, 2025, the weighted-average remaining lease term of our operating leases was 2.2 years.
The Company’s lease agreements do not contain material variable lease payments, buyout options, residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants.
Most of the Company’s leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term by varying amounts. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. We do not include options to renew in our measurement of lease assets and lease liabilities as they are not considered reasonably assured of exercise as of March 31, 2025.
The lease liability is determined by discounting future lease payments using a discount rate based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar collateralized borrowing. The discount rate is calculated using estimates of capitalization rates and borrowing rates. As of March 31, 2025, the weighted-average discount rate used to determine our operating lease liability was 6.0%.
Lease expense included in general and administrative expenses on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations was $219,000 and $254,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Future minimum rental commitments as of March 31, 2025 under these leases are expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|