(11) Legal Proceedings

As of March 29, 2025, USPB is not involved in any litigation. However, because its ownership interest in NBP is USPB’s largest asset and because of the cattle procurement and distribution relationship between USPB and NBP, litigation involving NBP may impact USPB.

NBP is a defendant in (i) five putative class action lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging that NBP violated some combination of the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Packers and Stockyards Act, the Commodity Exchange Act, and various state laws and (ii) putative class action lawsuits in the Supreme Court of British Columbia and the Superior Court of Quebec for the district of Montreal alleging that it violated the Canadian Competition Act and various provincial laws (the “Beef Class Actions”).  The Beef Class Actions are entitled In re Cattle Antitrust Litigation, which was filed originally on April 23, 2019; Peterson et al. v. JBS USA Food Company Holdings, et al., which was filed originally on April 26, 2019; In re DPP Beef Litigation, which was filed originally on April 26, 2019; Erbert & Gerbert’s, Inc. v. JBS USA Food Company Holdings, et al., which was filed originally on June 18, 2020; Specht v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on October 31, 2022; Giang Bui v. Cargill, Incorporated, et al. which was filed originally on February 18, 2022; and Sylvie De Bellefeuille v. Cargill, Inc. et al., which was filed originally on March 24, 2022.  Since the original class action complaints were filed, certain purchasers of beef products have opted to file individual complaints and to proceed with direct actions making similar claims (the “Opt-Out Cases”), and others may do so in the future. The Opt-Out Cases are entitled Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and Bi-Lo Holding, LLC v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed on August 2, 2021 in the United States District Court, Minnesota; Cheney Brothers, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed on January 31, 2022 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; Subway v. Cargill, Inc. et al., which was filed on February 22, 2022 in the United States District Court, Connecticut; Amory Investments LLC v. Cargill, Inc. et al., which was filed originally on March 8, 2022 in the United States District Court, Northern District of New York; Associated Grocers, Inc., et al. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on May 12, 2022 in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on June 8, 2022 in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Sysco Corporation v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on September 30, 2022 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas; John Soules Foods, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on August 5, 2022 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas; Associated Grocers of the South et al. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on September 15, 2022 in the United States District Court, District of Montana; The Kroger Co. et al. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on September 15, 2022 in the United States District Court, District of Montana; Spartannash Co vs. Cargill, Inc. et al, which was filed originally on September 21, 2022 in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Kraft Heinz Food Company v. Cargill Inc., et al., which was filed originally on September 30, 2022 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; Aramark Food and Support Services Group., Inc. v. Cargill Inc., et al., which was filed originally on September 30, 2022 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; ARCOP, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 19, 2022 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; CKE Restaurant Holdings, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 19, 2022 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; Sonic Industries Services Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al., which was filed originally on December 20, 2022 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 20, 2022 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; Whatabrands LLC et al. vs. Cargill, Inc., et al. which was filed originally on December 20, 2022 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; Sherwood Food Distributors, LLC et al.v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on March 7, 2023 in the United States District Court, Easter District of New York; McClane Company, Inc v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on April 3, 2023 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; Aldi, Inc v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on August 28. 2023 in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Quirich Foods, LLC et al. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on October 9, 2023 in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Conagra Brands, Inc v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on October 31, 2023 in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Compass Group USA, Inc v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on October 31, 2023 in the United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina; Target Corp v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 29, 2023 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 29, 2023 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; Glazier Foods Co et al. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 29, 2023 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; Jetro Holdings, Inc v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 29, 2023 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; Quality Supply Chain Co-Op, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on December 29, 2023 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; and Sodexo, Inc., et al. v. Cargill, Inc., et al., which was filed originally on April 29, 2024 in the United States District Court of Maryland, and McDonald’s Corporation v. Cargill, Inc., et. al., which was originally file on October 4, 2024 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York. On October 4, 2022, the United States Beef Class Actions and Opt-Out Cases were consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court, Minnesota District under the style In re: Cattle and Beef Antitrust Litigation. The plaintiffs in these cases seek treble damages and other relief under various laws including the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Canadian Competition Act, the Packers & Stockyards Act, and/or the Commodities Exchange Act and various state and provincial laws and attorneys’ fees.  NBP believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims in these cases and intends to defend them vigorously. There can be no assurances, however, as to the outcome of these matters or the impact on NBP’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition to the antitrust litigation, NBP is subject to an investigation by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and approximately 30 state attorneys general regarding fed cattle and beef packing markets.  NBP has responded to the federal and state requests for information and cooperated with the investigations. NBP believes it has meritorious defenses to any potential claims that might arise out of these government investigations, although there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these investigations or the impact on NBP’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

NBP is a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit entitled Brown, et al. v. JBS USA Food Company et al. and filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado on November 1, 2022. The defendants filed motions to dismiss, which the court denied except as to NBP’s subsidiary, Iowa Premium. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on January 12, 2024. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants directly and through industry wage surveys and a benchmarking service (i) fixed wages and benefits, and (ii) exchanged information regarding compensation and benefits in an effort to depress and stabilize wages and benefits in violation of federal antitrust laws. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, treble monetary damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, declaratory and injunctive relief and the costs of the suit (including attorney fees). NBP believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims in this case, and if this proceeds to trial, intends to defend the case vigorously; however, NBP has negotiated a settlement with the plaintiffs in the employee wages and benefits matter. The settlement was submitted to the District Court for approval and the District Court granted a motion to preliminarily approve the settlement for approximately $14.2 million on January 15, 2025, and NBP has paid the settlement funds into escrow. If the settlement is not ultimately approved, there can be no assurances, however, as to the outcome of this case or the impact on the NBP’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

NBP is a party to various other lawsuits and claims arising out of the operation of its business.  Management of NBP believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on NBP’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

USPB is not able to assess what impact, if any, the actions described above will have on NBP or USPB.