COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Other Commitments We lease property and equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Refer to Note 5—Leases for further details. In September 2020, we issued the 2020 Convertible Senior Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $230.0 million bearing an interest rate of 1.00% due in September 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we partially paid down the 2020 Convertible Senior Notes and issued the 2024 Convertible Senior Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $172.5 million bearing an interest rate of 4.25% due on April 1, 2029. Refer to Note 6—Debt and Financing Arrangements for further details. In January 2024, we renewed a cloud hosting agreement guaranteeing aggregate spend to a cloud hosting provider of $17.0 million each year over a three-year period. Litigation From time to time, we may become involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business including, but not limited to, intellectual property infringement and collection matters. We make assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters using the latest information available. We record a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable estimate of the loss is a range, we accrue the best estimate within the range. If no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the minimum amount within the range. If an unfavorable outcome is probable but the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated, we disclose the nature of the litigation and indicates that an estimate of the loss or range of loss cannot be made. If an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the estimated loss is material, we disclose the nature and estimate of the possible loss of the litigation. We do not disclose information with respect to litigation where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be remote or where the estimated loss would not be material. On January 22, 2025, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed against Cardlytics and certain of its current and former officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, captioned Froess v. Cardlytics, Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-00279-MHC. The complaint, brought on behalf of a putative class of all persons who purchased our securities between March 14, 2024 and August 7, 2024, alleged that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On February 13, 2025, we filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Subsequently, on March 7, 2025, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the dismissal is without prejudice, the plaintiff reserves the right to refile similar claims in the future. We are not presently a party to any other legal proceedings that, if determined adversely to us, would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

We lease property and equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Refer to Note 5—Leases for further details. In September 2020, we issued the 2020 Convertible Senior Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $230.0 million bearing an interest rate of 1.00% due in September 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we partially paid down the 2020 Convertible Senior Notes and issued the 2024 Convertible Senior Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $172.5 million bearing an interest rate of 4.25% due on April 1, 2029. Refer to Note 6—Debt and Financing Arrangements for further details.

From time to time, we may become involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business including, but not limited to, intellectual property infringement and collection matters. We make assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters using the latest information available. We record a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable estimate of the loss is a range, we accrue the best estimate within the range. If no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the minimum amount within the range. If an unfavorable outcome is probable but the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated, we disclose the nature of the litigation and indicates that an estimate of the loss or range of loss cannot be made. If an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the estimated loss is material, we disclose the nature and estimate of the possible loss of the litigation. We do not disclose information with respect to litigation where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be remote or where the estimated loss would not be material.

On January 22, 2025, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed against Cardlytics and certain of its current and former officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, captioned Froess v. Cardlytics, Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-00279-MHC. The complaint, brought on behalf of a putative class of all persons who purchased our securities between March 14, 2024 and August 7, 2024, alleged that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

On February 13, 2025, we filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Subsequently, on March 7, 2025, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the dismissal is without prejudice, the plaintiff reserves the right to refile similar claims in the future.

We are not presently a party to any other legal proceedings that, if determined adversely to us, would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.