Commitments and Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note 5 - Commitments and Contingencies: *Contingency Matters* In re CorMedix Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-14020 (D.N.J.) On October 13, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey consolidated into In re CorMedix Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv 14020-JXN-CLW, two putative class action lawsuits filed on or about July 22, 2021 and September 13, 2021, respectively, and appointed lead counsel and lead plaintiff, a purported stockholder of the Company. The lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended class action complaint on December 14, 2021, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, along with Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. On October 10, 2022, the lead plaintiff filed a second amended consolidated complaint that superseded the original complaints in In re CorMedix Securities Litigation. On March 21, 2024, the court denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss without prejudice and granted lead plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. On April 22, 2024, lead plaintiff filed a third amended consolidated complaint that superseded the second amended consolidated complaint. In the third amended complaint, the lead plaintiff seeks to represent a class of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired CorMedix securities between October 16, 2019 and August 8, 2022, inclusive. The third amended complaint names as defendants the Company and six (6) current and former officers of CorMedix, namely Khoso Baluch, Robert Cook, Matthew David, Phoebe Mounts, John L. Armstrong, and Joseph Todisco (the “Officer Defendants” and collectively with CorMedix, the “CorMedix Defendants”). The third amended complaint alleges that the CorMedix Defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5) and that the Officer Defendants violated Section 20(a). In general, the purported bases for these claims are allegedly false and misleading statements and omissions related to the NDA submissions to the FDA for DefenCath, subsequent complete response letters, as well as communications from the FDA related and directed to the Company’s contract manufacturing organization and heparin supplier. The Company intends to vigorously contest such claims. The Company filed its motion to dismiss the third amended complaint on June 6, 2024, and received from Plaintiffs their opposition to the Company’s motion to dismiss on July 22, 2024. The Company filed its response on August 21, 2024. In re CorMedix Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-18493-JXN-LDW (D.N.J.) On or about October 13, 2021, a purported shareholder, derivatively and on behalf of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in a case entitled Voter v. Baluch, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-18493-JXN-LDW (the “Derivative Litigation”). The complaint names as defendants Khoso Baluch, Janet Dillione, Alan W. Dunton, Myron Kaplan, Steven Lefkowitz, Paulo F. Costa, Greg Duncan, Matthew David, Phoebe Mounts and Joseph Todisco along with the Company as Nominal Defendant. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties, abuse of control, and waste of corporate assets against the defendants and a claim for contribution for purported violations of Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act against certain defendants. The individual defendants intend to vigorously contest such claims. On January 21, 2022, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the Court entered an order staying the case while the motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit described in the foregoing paragraph is pending. The stay may be terminated before the motion to dismiss is resolved according to certain circumstances described in the stipulation available on the Court’s public docket. On or about January 13, 2023, another purported shareholder, derivatively and on behalf of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in a case entitled DeSalvo v. Costa, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00150-JXN-CLW. Defendants Paulo F. Costa, Janet D. Dillione, Greg Duncan, Alan Dunton, Myron Kaplan, Steven Lefkowitz, Joseph Todisco, Khoso Baluch, Robert Cook, Matthew David, Phoebe Mounts, and John L. Armstrong along with the Company as Nominal Defendant. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment against the individual defendants. On or about January 25, 2023, another purported shareholder, derivatively and on behalf of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in a case entitled Scullion v. Baluch, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00406-ES-ESK. Defendants Khoso Baluch, Janet Dillione, Alan W. Dunton, Myron Kaplan, Steven Lefkowitz, Paulo F. Costa, Gregory Duncan, Matthew David, and Phoebe Mounts, along with the Company as Nominal Defendant. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties. On or about April 18, 2023, the Court entered an order consolidating the above-mentioned shareholder derivative complaints for all purposes, including pretrial proceedings, trial and appeal. The consolidated derivative action is entitled, In re CorMedix Inc. Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 2:21-cv-18493-JXN-LDW. The individual defendants intend to vigorously contest the claims set forth in the consolidated derivative action. The provisions of the Order to Stay entered in the Voter Action on January 21, 2022, apply to the consolidated derivative action. On April 20, 2023, the consolidated derivative action was administratively terminated and removed from the Court’s docket until the motion to dismiss the class action is resolved and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, or PSLRA, stay is lifted. On April 22, 2024, the lead plaintiff in the class action filed a third amended complaint. The class action remains stayed under the PSLRA. Demand Letter On or about June 23, 2022, the Company’s Board received a letter demanding it investigate and pursue causes of action, purportedly on behalf of the Company, against certain current and former directors, officers, and/or other employees of the Company (the “Letter”), which the Board believes are duplicative of the claims already asserted in the Derivative Litigation. As set forth in the Board’s response to the Letter, the Board will consider the Letter at an appropriate time, as circumstances warrant, as it continues to monitor the progress of the Derivative Litigation. *Commitments* *License and Assignment Agreement* In 2008, the Company entered into a License and Assignment Agreement (the ND License Agreement) with ND Partners, LLP (NDP). Pursuant to the ND License Agreement, NDP granted the Company exclusive, worldwide licenses for certain antimicrobial catheter lock solutions, processes for treating and inhibiting infections, a biocidal lock system and a taurolidine delivery apparatus, and the corresponding United States and foreign patents and applications (the NDP Technology). As consideration in part for the rights to the NDP Technology, upon execution of the ND License Agreement, the Company paid NDP an initial licensing fee of $325,000 and granted NDP a 5% equity interest in the Company, consisting of 7,996 shares of the Company’s common stock. Under the ND License Agreement, the Company is required to make cash and equity payments to NDP upon the achievement of certain milestones. Under the ND License Agreement, the maximum aggregate amount of cash payments due upon achievement of applicable milestones was $2,500,000, with the balance being $2,000,000 as of December 31, 2024. The initial licensing fee of $325,000, the fair value of the 5% equity interest (7,996 shares of the Company’s common stock) and an additional $500,000, as a result of the achievement of one milestone, were recognized on the Company’s statement of operations in R&D in prior periods, as the related milestones were achieved by the Company prior to the FDA approval. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company determined it was probable that the net sales milestones would be achieved in future periods and, as a result, the Company recorded a license intangible asset of $2,000,000 and a license agreement liability of $2,000,000, which was included within accrued expenses in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2025. In May 2025, the Company paid the final milestone payments in the aggregate amount of $2,000,000. Beginning in the second quarter of 2024, the license intangible asset is amortized as cost of goods sold over its estimated economic life of approximately 10 years. The amortization start period correlates with the product launch of DefenCath and the first period in which revenue will be recognized. Amortization expense of approximately $52,000 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2025. The ND License Agreement will expire on a country-by-country basis upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of the last patent claim under the ND License Agreement in a given country, or (ii) the payment of all milestone payments. Upon the expiration of the ND License Agreement in each country, we will have an irrevocable, perpetual, fully paid-up, royalty-free exclusive license to the NDP Technology in such country. The ND License Agreement also may be terminated by NDP if the Company materially breaches or defaults under the ND License Agreement and that breach is not cured within 60 days following the delivery of written notice to the Company, or by the Company on a country-by-country basis upon 60 days prior written notice in the event the Company’s Board determines not to proceed with the development of the NDP Technology. If the ND License Agreement is terminated by either party, the Company’s rights to the NDP Technology will revert back to NDP. *Other Commitments* In December 2024, we entered into a three-year agreement with Syneos Health Commercial Services, LLC (“Syneos”) under which Syneos will provide a dedicated inpatient field sales force that will exclusively promote DefenCath to hospitals and health systems. We have paid an up-front implementation and are obligated to pay a fixed monthly fee. Upon the twelve-month anniversary of the deployment date, expected to be in the second quarter of 2026, the agreement is cancelable upon 60 day’s written notice. As of March 31, 2025, the minimum amount committed under this agreement totals $9.1 million. We entered into a seven-year operating lease agreement in March 2020 for an office space at 300 Connell Drive, Berkeley Heights, New Jersey 07922. The lease agreement, with a monthly average cost of approximately $17,000, commenced on September 16, 2020.

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2025

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Note 5 - Commitments and Contingencies:

Contingency Matters

In re CorMedix Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-14020 (D.N.J.)

On October 13, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey consolidated into In re CorMedix Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv 14020-JXN-CLW, two putative class action lawsuits filed on or about July 22, 2021 and September 13, 2021, respectively, and appointed lead counsel and lead plaintiff, a purported stockholder of the Company. The lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended class action complaint on December 14, 2021, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, along with Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. On October 10, 2022, the lead plaintiff filed a second amended consolidated complaint that superseded the original complaints in In re CorMedix Securities Litigation. On March 21, 2024, the court denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss without prejudice and granted lead plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. On April 22, 2024, lead plaintiff filed a third amended consolidated complaint that superseded the second amended consolidated complaint. In the third amended complaint, the lead plaintiff seeks to represent a class of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired CorMedix securities between October 16, 2019 and August 8, 2022, inclusive. The third amended complaint names as defendants the Company and six (6) current and former officers of CorMedix, namely Khoso Baluch, Robert Cook, Matthew David, Phoebe Mounts, John L. Armstrong, and Joseph Todisco (the “Officer Defendants” and collectively with CorMedix, the “CorMedix Defendants”). The third amended complaint alleges that the CorMedix Defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5) and that the Officer Defendants violated Section 20(a). In general, the purported bases for these claims are allegedly false and misleading statements and omissions related to the NDA submissions to the FDA for DefenCath, subsequent complete response letters, as well as communications from the FDA related and directed to the Company’s contract manufacturing organization and heparin supplier. The Company intends to vigorously contest such claims. The Company filed its motion to dismiss the third amended complaint on June 6, 2024, and received from Plaintiffs their opposition to the Company’s motion to dismiss on July 22, 2024. The Company filed its response on August 21, 2024.

In re CorMedix Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-18493-JXN-LDW (D.N.J.)

On or about October 13, 2021, a purported shareholder, derivatively and on behalf of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in a case entitled Voter v. Baluch, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-18493-JXN-LDW (the “Derivative Litigation”). The complaint names as defendants Khoso Baluch, Janet Dillione, Alan W. Dunton, Myron Kaplan, Steven Lefkowitz, Paulo F. Costa, Greg Duncan, Matthew David, Phoebe Mounts and Joseph Todisco along with the Company as Nominal Defendant. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties, abuse of control, and waste of corporate assets against the defendants and a claim for contribution for purported violations of Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act against certain defendants. The individual defendants intend to vigorously contest such claims. On January 21, 2022, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the Court entered an order staying the case while the motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit described in the foregoing paragraph is pending. The stay may be terminated before the motion to dismiss is resolved according to certain circumstances described in the stipulation available on the Court’s public docket.

On or about January 13, 2023, another purported shareholder, derivatively and on behalf of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in a case entitled DeSalvo v. Costa, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00150-JXN-CLW. Defendants Paulo F. Costa, Janet D. Dillione, Greg Duncan, Alan Dunton, Myron Kaplan, Steven Lefkowitz, Joseph Todisco, Khoso Baluch, Robert Cook, Matthew David, Phoebe Mounts, and John L. Armstrong along with the Company as Nominal Defendant. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment against the individual defendants.

On or about January 25, 2023, another purported shareholder, derivatively and on behalf of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, in a case entitled Scullion v. Baluch, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00406-ES-ESK. Defendants Khoso Baluch, Janet Dillione, Alan W. Dunton, Myron Kaplan, Steven Lefkowitz, Paulo F. Costa, Gregory Duncan, Matthew David, and Phoebe Mounts, along with the Company as Nominal Defendant. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties.

On or about April 18, 2023, the Court entered an order consolidating the above-mentioned shareholder derivative complaints for all purposes, including pretrial proceedings, trial and appeal. The consolidated derivative action is entitled, In re CorMedix Inc. Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 2:21-cv-18493-JXN-LDW. The individual defendants intend to vigorously contest the claims set forth in the consolidated derivative action. The provisions of the Order to Stay entered in the Voter Action on January 21, 2022, apply to the consolidated derivative action. On April 20, 2023, the consolidated derivative action was administratively terminated and removed from the Court’s docket until the motion to dismiss the class action is resolved and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, or PSLRA, stay is lifted. On April 22, 2024, the lead plaintiff in the class action filed a third amended complaint. The class action remains stayed under the PSLRA.

Demand Letter

On or about June 23, 2022, the Company’s Board received a letter demanding it investigate and pursue causes of action, purportedly on behalf of the Company, against certain current and former directors, officers, and/or other employees of the Company (the “Letter”), which the Board believes are duplicative of the claims already asserted in the Derivative Litigation. As set forth in the Board’s response to the Letter, the Board will consider the Letter at an appropriate time, as circumstances warrant, as it continues to monitor the progress of the Derivative Litigation.

Commitments

License and Assignment Agreement

In 2008, the Company entered into a License and Assignment Agreement (the ND License Agreement) with ND Partners, LLP (NDP). Pursuant to the ND License Agreement, NDP granted the Company exclusive, worldwide licenses for certain antimicrobial catheter lock solutions, processes for treating and inhibiting infections, a biocidal lock system and a taurolidine delivery apparatus, and the corresponding United States and foreign patents and applications (the NDP Technology). As consideration in part for the rights to the NDP Technology, upon execution of the ND License Agreement, the Company paid NDP an initial licensing fee of $325,000 and granted NDP a 5% equity interest in the Company, consisting of 7,996 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Under the ND License Agreement, the Company is required to make cash and equity payments to NDP upon the achievement of certain milestones. Under the ND License Agreement, the maximum aggregate amount of cash payments due upon achievement of applicable milestones was $2,500,000, with the balance being $2,000,000 as of December 31, 2024. The initial licensing fee of $325,000, the fair value of the 5% equity interest (7,996 shares of the Company’s common stock) and an additional $500,000, as a result of the achievement of one milestone, were recognized on the Company’s statement of operations in R&D in prior periods, as the related milestones were achieved by the Company prior to the FDA approval. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company determined it was probable that the net sales milestones would be achieved in future periods and, as a result, the Company recorded a license intangible asset of $2,000,000 and a license agreement liability of $2,000,000, which was included within accrued expenses in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2025. In May 2025, the Company paid the final milestone payments in the aggregate amount of $2,000,000.

Beginning in the second quarter of 2024, the license intangible asset is amortized as cost of goods sold over its estimated economic life of approximately 10 years. The amortization start period correlates with the product launch of DefenCath and the first period in which revenue will be recognized. Amortization expense of approximately $52,000 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2025.

The ND License Agreement will expire on a country-by-country basis upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of the last patent claim under the ND License Agreement in a given country, or (ii) the payment of all milestone payments. Upon the expiration of the ND License Agreement in each country, we will have an irrevocable, perpetual, fully paid-up, royalty-free exclusive license to the NDP Technology in such country. The ND License Agreement also may be terminated by NDP if the Company materially breaches or defaults under the ND License Agreement and that breach is not cured within 60 days following the delivery of written notice to the Company, or by the Company on a country-by-country basis upon 60 days prior written notice in the event the Company’s Board determines not to proceed with the development of the NDP Technology. If the ND License Agreement is terminated by either party, the Company’s rights to the NDP Technology will revert back to NDP.

Other Commitments

In December 2024, we entered into a three-year agreement with Syneos Health Commercial Services, LLC (“Syneos”) under which Syneos will provide a dedicated inpatient field sales force that will exclusively promote DefenCath to hospitals and health systems. We have paid an up-front implementation and are obligated to pay a fixed monthly fee. Upon the twelve-month anniversary of the deployment date, expected to be in the second quarter of 2026, the agreement is cancelable upon 60 day’s written notice. As of March 31, 2025, the minimum amount committed under this agreement totals $9.1 million.

We entered into a seven-year operating lease agreement in March 2020 for an office space at 300 Connell Drive, Berkeley Heights, New Jersey 07922. The lease agreement, with a monthly average cost of approximately $17,000, commenced on September 16, 2020.