Check box if the only securities being registered on this Form are being offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans. |
Check box if any securities being registered on this Form will be offered on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), other than securities offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan. |
Check box if this Form is a registration statement pursuant to General Instruction A.2 or a post-effective amendment thereto. |
Check box if this Form is a registration statement pursuant to General Instruction B or a post-effective amendment thereto that will become effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Rule 462(e) under the Securities Act. |
Check box if this Form is a post-effective amendment to a registration statement filed pursuant to General Instruction B to register additional securities or additional classes of securities pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities Act. |
when declared effective pursuant to section 8(c) of the Securities Act |
This [post-effective] amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed [post-effective amendment] [registration statement]. |
This Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, and the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering is: |
This Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, and the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering is: |
This Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, and the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering is: |
Registered Closed-End Fund (closed-end company that is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”)). |
Business Development Company (closed-end company that intends or has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act). |
Interval Fund (Registered Closed-End Fund or a Business Development Company that makes periodic repurchase offers under Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act). |
A.2 Qualified (qualified to register securities pursuant to General Instruction A.2 of this Form). |
Well-Known Seasoned Issuer (as defined by Rule 405 under the Securities Act). |
Emerging Growth Company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). |
☐ | If an Emerging Growth Company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of Securities Act. |
New Registrant (registered or regulated under the Investment Company Act for less than 12 calendar months preceding this filing). |
1 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
47 | ||||
47 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | ||||
54 | ||||
79 | ||||
80 | ||||
83 | ||||
84 | ||||
85 | ||||
89 | ||||
95 | ||||
98 | ||||
109 | ||||
113 | ||||
113 | ||||
113 | ||||
114 | ||||
114 | ||||
114 | ||||
117 | ||||
118 | ||||
118 | ||||
118 |
The Company |
KKR US Direct Lending Fund-U Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation that is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company. |
Investment Objective |
The Company’s investment objective is to generate current income. There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve its investment objective. The Company’s investment objective is not fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) without approval of the shareholders of the Company (“Shareholders”). |
Investment Strategies |
The Company seeks to meet its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. middle market companies that have EBITDA of $50 million or above. The Company, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of its borrowings for investment purposes) in a portfolio of loans to companies having their principal place of business in the United States. |
The Company focuses on direct originated transactions and proprietary or limited syndicated transactions with third-party intermediaries including investment banks. The Company invests primarily in a portfolio of direct lending investments. |
The Company defines direct originations as any investment where KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (the “Adviser”) or its affiliates negotiates the terms of the transaction beyond just the price, which, for example, may include negotiating financial covenants, maturity dates or interest rate terms. These directly originated transactions include participation in other originated transactions where there may be third parties involved, or a bank acting as an intermediary, for a closely held club, or similar transactions. |
The Company may invest without limit in subordinated debt (including second lien), including mezzanine and payment-in-kind |
In addition, the Company invests in traded credit, primarily for liquidity management purposes (as the Adviser determines necessary or advisable), including, without limitation, in anticipation of the making of investments, in connection with the issuance of Shares, |
anticipated withdrawals and distributions and the repayment of principal of existing investments. Traded credit strategies are directed at investing in syndicated bank loans, high-yield bonds, and other traded credit instruments such as structured credit. |
While the Company focuses mainly on investment opportunities in the United States, it also invests in companies in developed countries outside the United States, subject to the limitations described herein. The Company may invest in companies of any size or capitalization. Subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act, the Company may invest in loans or other securities, the proceeds of which may refinance or otherwise repay debt or securities of companies whose debt was originated and directly negotiated by the Adviser with the Company’s co-investment affiliates. From time to time, the Company may co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions, including investments originated and directly negotiated by the Adviser with the Company’s co-investment affiliates. The Company does not intend to invest in portfolio companies or other issuers that are affiliated with KKR (as defined below). |
The Company may invest in loans and securities with any maturity or duration. The Company’s debt investments may be rated by an accepted nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (“NRSRO”) and, in such case, generally will carry a rating below investment grade (rated lower than “Baa3” by Moody’s or lower than “BBB-” by S&P), which are often referred to as “junk.” The Company may invest without limit in debt or other securities of any rating, as well as debt or other securities that have not been rated by a by an NRSRO. |
The Company employs leverage as market conditions permit and at the discretion of the Adviser, but in no event will leverage employed exceed the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The Company uses leverage in the form of borrowings, including loans from certain financial institutions. The Company may also use leverage by issuing preferred shares, issuing debt or by using reverse repurchase agreements or similar transactions. |
In determining whether to borrow money or issue debt, the Adviser analyzes, as applicable, the maturity, covenant package and rate structure of the proposed borrowings as well as the risks of such borrowings compared to the Company’s investment outlook. Any such leverage, if incurred, is expected to increase the total capital available for investment by the Company. See “Risk Factors—Leverage Risk.” |
The Company may enter into interest rate, foreign exchange or other derivative agreements, including swaps, futures, forwards and options, to hedge interest rate, currency, credit or other risks. These hedging activities, which are in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, may include the use of futures, options and forward contracts. The Company bears the costs incurred in connection with entering into, administering and settling any such |
derivative contracts. There can be no assurance any hedging strategy employed by the Company will be successful. |
The Company’s investment strategies are not fundamental and may be changed by the Board without Shareholder approval. The Company’s 80% investment policy with respect to loans to companies having their principal place of business in the United States may only be changed with 60 days’ prior notice to Shareholders. |
The Offering |
The Company is offering shares (“Shares”) on a continuous basis at a price at or greater than net asset value (“NAV”) per Share. The minimum initial commitment (“Commitment”) to the Company is $25,000. The minimum initial commitment may be reduced or waived at the discretion of the Adviser. |
The Company and the Distributor (defined below) reserve the right to reject a purchase order for any reason. Shareholders do not have the right to redeem their Shares. However, as described below, the Company expects to conduct periodic repurchase offers at NAV per Share as of the applicable valuation date at such times as may be determined by the Board in its sole discretion. |
Liquidity; Transfer Restrictions |
The Company is a highly illiquid investment. Shares are not, and there is no intention that Shares will be, listed on any securities exchange or traded in any public or other market. An investment in the Company is suitable only for investors who have no need for liquidity in their investment. |
Shareholders have no rights to redeem or transfer their Shares, other than limited rights of a Shareholder’s descendants or estate to request a repurchase of shares in the event of such Shareholder’s death. Such repurchase may be made, at the Company’s discretion, in a manner consistent with the Company’s periodic repurchases or in such other manner permitted by the Exchange Act, the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder. Documentation for such repurchase request will be required as necessary to confirm the authority of the descendant or estate to make such request on behalf of the deceased Shareholder. |
Repurchase of Shares |
The Company expects to conduct periodic repurchase offers at NAV per Share as of the applicable valuation date at such times as may be determined by the Board in its sole discretion. However, no assurance can be given that repurchases will occur or that any Shares properly tendered will be repurchased by the Company. |
In any given period, the Adviser may or may not recommend to the Board that the Company conduct a tender offer. For example, if adverse market conditions cause the Company’s investments to become illiquid or trade at depressed prices or if the Adviser believes that conducting a tender offer would impose an undue burden on Shareholders who do not tender compared to the benefits of giving Shareholders the opportunity to sell all or a portion of their Shares at NAV, the Company may choose not to conduct a tender offer. Regardless of the recommendation of the Adviser, the Board may or may not determine to cause the Company to conduct a tender offer for any given period. |
There may be periods in which no tender offer is made, and it is possible that no tender offers will be conducted by the Company at all. If a tender offer is not made, Shareholders may not be able to sell their Shares as it is unlikely that a secondary market for the Shares will develop or, if a secondary market does develop, Shareholders may be able to sell their Shares only at substantial discounts from NAV. If the Company does conduct tender offers, it may be required to borrow or sell its more liquid, higher quality portfolio securities to fund the purchase of Shares that are tendered, which may increase risks for remaining Shareholders and increase fund expenses as a percent of assets. The Company, at its discretion, may choose to satisfy all or any portion of the amounts due to a shareholder in connection with any tender offer through an in-kind distribution of its assets. The Company is designed primarily for long-term investors, and an investment in the Shares should be considered illiquid. |
See “Redemptions, Repurchases and Transfers of Shares.” |
Leverage |
The Company employs leverage as market conditions permit and at the discretion of the Adviser, but in no event will leverage employed exceed the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The Company uses leverage in the form of borrowings, including loans from certain financial institutions. The Company may also use leverage by issuing preferred shares, issuing debt or by using reverse repurchase agreements or similar transactions. In general, the use of leverage by the Company may increase the volatility of the Company. |
Distributions |
Dividends on the Shares in amounts representing substantially all of the net investment income, if any, earned each year are generally paid at least annually at the Company’s discretion. The Company is not a suitable investment for any investor who requires regular dividend income. The Company intends to pay dividends representing substantially all of the net capital gains, if any, it earns each year at least annually. |
Adviser |
The Adviser serves as the Company’s investment adviser pursuant to the terms of an investment advisory agreement with the Company. The Adviser, a subsidiary of KKR & Co. Inc. (together with the Adviser and its other affiliates, “KKR”), is a leading manager of non-investment grade debt and public equities. The Adviser was formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 24, 2004 and is a registered investment adviser under the 1940 Act. The Adviser currently serves as an investment adviser of certain unregistered private investment companies and registered investment companies. The Adviser uses KKR’s global network of resources, due diligence skills, intellectual capital and experience in seeking to achieve the Company’s investment objective. KKR is a leading global investment firm that operates an integrated global platform for sourcing and executing investments across multiple industries, asset classes and geographies. |
As of December 31, 2024, KKR had approximately $638 billion in assets under management (“AUM”). As of December 31, 2024, the Adviser had approximately $276 billion in AUM. |
Pursuant to an investment advisory agreement, the Adviser receives an annual fee, payable monthly by the Company, in an amount equal to 1.25% of the Company’s month end net assets (the “Management Fee”). |
The Adviser has agreed to reduce its Management Fee to an annual rate of 0.00% of the Company’s month end net assets (the “Management Fee Waiver”). The Management Fee Waiver will remain in effect through at least December 31, 2025, though the Adviser does not currently intend to terminate the Management Fee Waiver after that date. After December 31, 2025, the Management Fee Waiver may be terminated only upon 60 days’ notice by the Board or the Adviser. See “Management of the Company—Investment Advisory Agreement.” |
Administrator |
KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC also serves as administrator to the Company (the “Administrator”). Under the administration agreement, the Administrator is responsible for generally managing the administrative affairs of the Company. The Administrator has also entered into a sub-administration agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon. |
Custodian and Transfer Agent |
The Company has engaged The Bank of New York Mellon as the Company’s custodian (the “Custodian”). The Company has engaged BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc. as the Company’s transfer agent (the “Transfer Agent”). |
Distributor |
KKR Capital Markets LLC (the “Distributor”) is the principal underwriter and distributor of the Shares and serves in that capacity on a best efforts basis, subject to various conditions. |
Eligibility |
Shares of the Company are offered only to “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”). Investors who are “accredited investors” are referred to in this Confidential Memorandum as “Eligible Investors.” Certain sub-placement agents may impose stricter investor eligibility requirements (or, in the event applicable regulatory restrictions change, less stringent eligibility requirements). |
An investment in the Company involves a considerable amount of risk. A Shareholder may lose some or all of its investment in the Company. Before making an investment decision, a prospective investor should (i) consider the suitability of this investment with respect to the investor’s investment objectives and personal situation and (ii) consider factors such as the investor’s personal net worth, income, age, risk tolerance and liquidity needs. The Company is a highly illiquid investment. |
Risks |
Limited Operating History . non-diversified, closed-end management investment company with limited operating history. As a result, prospective investors have a limited track record or history on which to base their investment decision. The Company is subject to all the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new business. |
Investment and Market Risk. |
The Company is materially affected by market, economic and political conditions and events, such as natural disasters, geopolitical events, military conflicts, epidemics and pandemics, globally and in the jurisdictions and sectors in which it invests or operates, including factors affecting interest rates, the availability of credit, currency exchange rates, sanctions, tariffs and trade barriers. For example, COVID-19 adversely impacted, and any future outbreaks could adversely impact, the markets and economy in general, including the companies in which the Company invests, and could harm Company performance. Epidemics and pandemics have and may further result in, among other things, travel restrictions, closure of international borders, certain businesses and securities markets, restrictions on securities trading activities, quarantines, supply chain disruptions and reduced consumer demand, as well as general concern and uncertainty. Market, economic and political conditions and events are outside the Adviser’s control and could adversely affect the liquidity and value of the Company’s investments and reduce the ability of the Company to make attractive new investments. |
Ongoing events in the subprime mortgage market and other areas of the fixed income markets have caused and can continue to cause significant dislocations, illiquidity and volatility in the leveraged loan and bond markets, as well as in the wider global financial markets. To the extent portfolio companies and other issuers of the Company’s portfolio investments participate in or have exposure to such markets, the results of their operations could be adversely affected. In addition, to the extent that such economic and market events and conditions reoccur, this would have a further adverse impact on the availability |
of credit to businesses generally. Global economic conditions could adversely impact the financial resources and credit quality of corporate and other borrowers in which the Company invests and result in the inability of such borrowers to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance, outstanding debt when due. |
In the event of such defaults, the Company could suffer a partial or total loss of their investment in such borrowers, which would, in turn, have an adverse effect on the Company’s returns. Such economic and market events and conditions also could restrict the ability of the Company to sell or liquidate investments at favorable times or for favorable prices (although such events and conditions would not necessarily foreclose the Company’s ability to hold such investments until maturity). It is possible that the value of the Company’s investments will not generate expected current proceeds or appreciate as anticipated and could suffer a loss. |
Trends and historical events do not imply, forecast or predict future events and past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. There can be no assurance that the assumptions made or the beliefs and expectations currently held by the Adviser will prove correct, and actual events and circumstances can vary significantly. |
The Company will, from time to time, be subject to risk arising from a default by one of several large institutions that are dependent on one another to meet their liquidity or operational needs, so that a default by one institution could cause a series of defaults by the other institutions. This is sometimes referred to as “systemic risk” and could adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges, with which the Company interacts regularly. |
Illiquid and Long-Term Investments Risk. |
The return of capital and the realization of gains, if any, from an investment by the Company generally will occur only upon the partial or complete repayment or disposition of such investment, as to which there can be no certainty. The Company’s investments are speculative in nature and, particularly where leverage is used by the Company, there can be no assurance that current income received by the Company will be sufficient to service the Company’s debt or that any investor will receive a return of his or her invested capital or any distribution from the Company. While an investment can be sold or repaid at any time, this will occur typically a number of years after the investment is made, and investors should expect that they will not receive a return of their capital for a long period of time even if the Company’s investments prove successful. |
Certain investments by the Company could be in securities that are or become publicly traded and are therefore subject to the risks inherent in investing in public companies (including new issues of securities). These factors are outside the Adviser’s control and could adversely affect the liquidity and value of the Company’s investments and reduce the ability of the Company to make attractive new investments. In addition, in some cases the Company could be prohibited by contract or other limitations from selling such securities for a period so that the Company is unable to take advantage of favorable market prices. The Company will likely not have the same access to information in connection with investments in public companies, either when investigating a potential investment or after making an investment, as with investments in private companies. Furthermore, it can be expected from time to time that the Company will be limited in its ability to make investments, and to sell existing investments, in public or private companies because KKR could be deemed to have material, non-public information regarding the issuers of those securities or as a result of other internal policies. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to make investments in public companies that the Adviser otherwise deems appropriate or, if it does, as to the amount it will so invest. Moreover, the inability to sell investments in public or private companies in these circumstances could materially adversely affect the investment results of the Company. The Company also invests in securities exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the 1933 Act, which investment is likely to raise many of the same issues and risks discussed above. It is possible that the Adviser, in its sole discretion, will decline to receive material nonpublic information in respect of a public company in which the Company has invested that would otherwise be available to it to avoid being restricted from trading in securities issued by such public company or to avoid the Adviser or its affiliates being so restricted on behalf of other funds, vehicles or accounts sponsored, managed or advised by KKR or any of its affiliates. See “Conflicts of Interest.” |
First Lien, Senior Secured Loans and Senior Secured Bonds Risk. |
business entity (a “Borrower”). Senior Loans in most circumstances are fully collateralized by assets of the Borrower. Thus, they are generally repaid before unsecured bank loans, corporate bonds, subordinated debt, trade creditors and preferred or common stockholders. Substantial increases in interest rates could cause an increase in loan defaults as Borrowers might lack resources to meet higher debt service requirements. The value of the Company’s assets could also be affected by other uncertainties such as economic developments affecting the market for senior secured term loans or affecting Borrowers generally. Moreover, the security for the Company’s investments in secured debt might not be recognized for a variety of reasons, including the failure to make required filings by lenders, directors or other responsible parties and, as a result, the Company might not have priority over other creditors as anticipated. |
Senior Loans usually include restrictive covenants, which must be maintained by the Borrower. The Company will, from time to time, have an obligation with respect to certain senior secured term loan investments to make additional loans upon demand by the Borrower. Such instruments, unlike certain bonds, usually do not have call protection. This means that such interests, although having a stated term, can be prepaid, often without penalty. The rate of such prepayments will be affected by, among other things, general business and economic conditions, as well as the financial status of the Borrower. Prepayment would cause the actual duration of a Senior Loan to be shorter than its stated maturity. |
Senior Loans typically are secured by pledges of collateral from the Borrower in the form of tangible and intangible assets. In some instances, the Company invests in Senior Loans that are secured only by stock of the Borrower or its subsidiaries or affiliates. The value of the collateral could decline below the principal amount of the senior secured term loans subsequent to an investment by the Company. |
Senior Loans generally are not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or any state securities commission and are not listed on any national securities exchange. There is less readily available or reliable information about most Senior Loans than is the case for many other types of securities, including securities issued in transactions registered under the 1933 Act or registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). No active trading market exists for some Senior Loans, and some Senior Loans are subject to restrictions on resale. A secondary market could be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods, which could impair the Company’s ability to realize full value and thus cause a material decline in the Company’s NAV. In addition, at times, the Company will not be able to readily dispose of its Senior Loans at prices that approximate those at which the Company could sell such loans if they were more widely traded and, as a result of such illiquidity, the Company will, from time to time, have to sell |
other investments or engage in borrowing transactions if necessary to raise cash to meet its obligations. During periods of limited supply and liquidity of Senior Loans, the Company’s yield could be lower. See “Risks—Below Investment Grade Instruments Risk.” |
If legislation or government regulations impose additional requirements or restrictions on the ability of financial institutions to make loans, the availability of Senior Loans for investment by the Company will be adversely affected. In addition, such requirements or restrictions could reduce or eliminate sources of financing for certain Borrowers. This would increase the risk of default. |
Subordinated and Unsecured or Partially Secured Loans Risk. |
Fixed-Income Instruments Risk. |
From time to time, the obligor of a fixed-income instrument will not be able or willing to pay interest or to repay principal when due in accordance with the terms of the associated agreement. An obligor’s willingness and ability to pay interest or to repay principal due in a timely manner will be affected by, among other factors, its cash flow. Commercial bank lenders could be able to contest payments to the holders of other debt obligations of the same obligor in the event of default under their commercial bank loan agreements. |
Interest Rate Risk. non-U.S. financial markets. The Company expects that it will periodically experience imbalances in the interest rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities and the relationships of various interest rates to each other. In a changing interest rate environment, the Adviser might not be able to manage this risk effectively. If the Adviser is unable to manage interest rate risk effectively, the Company’s performance could be adversely affected. |
Credit Risk. non-payment of scheduled interest or principal by the borrowers with respect to such investments. Such non-payment would likely result in a reduction of income to the Company and a reduction in the value of the debt investments experiencing non-payment. |
The Company will, from time to time, invest in investments that the Adviser believes are secured by specific collateral, the value of which exceeds the principal amount of the investments at the time of initial investment. There can be no assurance, though, that the liquidation of any such collateral would satisfy the borrower’s obligation in the event of non-payment of scheduled interest or principal payments with respect to such investment or that such collateral could be readily liquidated. In addition, in the event of bankruptcy of a borrower, the Company could experience delays or limitations with respect to its ability to realize the benefits of the collateral securing an investment. Under certain circumstances, collateral securing an investment will be released without the consent of the Company. The Company, from time to time, also invests in high yield instruments and other unsecured investments, each of which involves a higher degree of risk than Senior Loans. The Company’s right to payment and its security interest, if any, could be subordinated to the payment rights and security interests of more senior creditors. Certain of these investments will have an interest-only payment schedule, with the principal amount remaining outstanding and at risk until the maturity of the investment. In this case, a portfolio company’s ability to repay the principal of an investment could be dependent upon a liquidity event or the long-term success of the company, the occurrence of which is uncertain. |
Companies in which the Company invests could deteriorate as a result of, among other factors, an adverse development in their business, a change in the competitive environment or an economic downturn. As a result, companies that the Company expected to be stable could operate, or expect to operate, at a loss or have significant variations in operating results, could require substantial additional capital to |
support their operations or maintain their competitive position or could otherwise have a weak financial condition or be experiencing financial distress. |
Risk of Investments in Companies in Regulated Industries. |
Prepayment Risk. pre-payable obligations in which the Company invests from time to time will be affected by general business conditions, market interest rates, borrowers’ financial conditions and competitive conditions among lenders. In a period of declining interest rates, borrowers are more likely to prepay investments more quickly than anticipated, reducing the yield to maturity and the average life of the relevant investment. Moreover, when the Company reinvests the proceeds of a prepayment in these circumstances, it will likely receive a rate of interest that is lower than the rate on the security that was prepaid. To the extent that the |
Company purchases the relevant investment at a premium, prepayments could result in a loss to the extent of the premium paid. If the Company buys such investments at a discount, both scheduled payments and unscheduled prepayments will increase current and total returns and unscheduled prepayments will also accelerate the recognition of income which could be taxable as ordinary income to Shareholders. In a period of rising interest rates, prepayments of investments could occur at a slower than expected rate, creating maturity extension risk. This particular risk could effectively change an investment that was considered short- or intermediate-term at the time of purchase into a longer-term investment. Because the value of longer-term investments generally fluctuates more widely in response to changes in interest rates than shorter-term investments, maturity extension risk could increase the volatility of the Company. When interest rates decline, the value of an investment with prepayment features might not increase as much as that of other fixed-income instruments, and, as noted above, changes in market rates of interest could accelerate or delay prepayments and thus affect maturities. |
Traded Credit Strategy Risk. |
Derivatives Risk. |
The counterparty risk for cleared derivative transactions is generally lower than for uncleared OTC derivatives because generally a clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a cleared derivative contract and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade looks only to the clearing house for performance of financial obligations. However, there can be no assurance that the clearing house, or its members, will satisfy its obligations to the Company. Exchange trading will generally increase market transparency and liquidity but could cause the Company to incur increased expenses. In addition, depending on the size of the Company and other factors, the margin required under the rules of a clearing house and by a clearing member could be in excess of the collateral required to be posted by the Company to support its obligations under a similar OTC derivative transaction. However, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), SEC and other applicable regulators have adopted rules imposing certain margin requirements, including minimums, on uncleared OTC derivative transactions which could result in the Company and its counterparties posting higher margin amounts for uncleared OTC derivative transactions. |
Certain of the derivative investments in which the Company invests will, in certain circumstances, give rise to a form of financial leverage, which may magnify the risk of owning such instruments. The ability to successfully use derivative investments depends on the ability of the Adviser to predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. In addition, amounts paid by the Company as premiums and cash or other assets held in margin accounts with respect to the Company’s derivative investments would not be available to the Company for other investment purposes, which could result in lost opportunities for gain. |
OTC derivatives generally are more difficult to purchase, sell or value than other investments. Although both OTC and exchange-traded derivatives markets can experience a lack of liquidity, OTC non-standardized derivative transactions are generally less liquid than exchange-traded instruments. The illiquidity of the derivatives markets can be due to various factors, including congestion, disorderly markets, limitations on deliverable supplies, the participation of speculators, government regulation and intervention, and technical and operational or system failures. In addition, the liquidity of a secondary market in an exchange-traded derivative contract could be adversely affected by “daily price fluctuation limits” established by the exchanges which limit the amount of fluctuation in an exchange-traded contract price during a single trading day. Once the daily limit has been reached in the contract, no trades may be entered into at a price beyond the limit, thus preventing the liquidation of open positions. Prices have in the past moved beyond the daily limit on a number of consecutive trading days. If it is not possible to close an open derivative position entered into by the Company, the Company would continue to be required to make cash payments of variation (or mark-to-market) |
adverse price movements. In such a situation, if the Company has insufficient cash, it could have to sell portfolio securities to meet settlement obligations and variation margin requirements at a time when it is disadvantageous to do so. The absence of liquidity generally would also make it more difficult for the Company to ascertain a market value for such instruments. The inability to close derivatives transactions positions also could have an adverse impact on the Company’s ability to effectively hedge its portfolio. OTC derivatives that are not cleared are also subject to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the other party to the contract will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with the Company. If a counterparty were to default on its obligations, the Company’s contractual remedies against such counterparty could be subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws, which could affect the Company’s rights as a creditor (e.g., the Company might not receive the net amount of payments that it is contractually entitled to receive). In addition, the use of certain derivatives could cause the Company to realize higher amounts of income or short-term capital gains (generally taxed at ordinary income tax rates). |
Derivatives transactions also are subject to operational risk, including from documentation issues, settlement issues, system failures, inadequate controls, and human error, and legal risk, including risk of insufficient documentation, insufficient capacity or authority of a counterparty, or legality or enforceability of a contract. |
The derivatives markets have become subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and margin requirements. In particular, in the United States the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) regulates the OTC derivatives market by, among other things, requiring many derivative transactions to be cleared and traded on an exchange, expanding entity registration requirements, imposing business conduct requirements on dealers and requiring banks to move some derivatives trading units to a non-guaranteed affiliate separate from the deposit-taking bank or divest them altogether. |
Regulation of the derivatives market presents additional risks to the Company and may limit the ability of the Company to use, and the availability or performance, of such instruments. For instance, under Rule 18f-4, a fund’s derivatives exposure is limited through a value-at-risk 18f-4. |
The Company’s investments in regulated derivatives instruments, such as swaps, futures, forwards and options, are subject to maximum position limits established by the CFTC and U.S. and foreign futures exchanges. All accounts owned or managed by advisers, such as the Adviser, their principals and affiliates are generally combined for |
purposes of the position limit rules. In order to comply with the position limits established by the CFTC and the relevant exchanges, the Adviser could in the future reduce the size of positions that would otherwise be taken for the Company or not trade in certain markets on behalf of the Company in order to avoid exceeding such limits. A violation of position limits by the Adviser could lead to regulatory action resulting in mandatory liquidation of certain positions held by the Adviser on behalf of the Company. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will liquidate positions held on behalf of all the Adviser’s accounts in a proportionate manner or at favorable prices, which could result in substantial losses to the Company. Such policies could affect the nature and extent of derivatives use by the Company. |
Repurchase Agreements Risk. |
In December 2023, the SEC adopted rule amendments providing that any covered clearing agency (“CCA”) for U.S. Treasury securities require that every direct participant of the CCA (which generally would be a bank or broker-dealer) submit for clearance and settlement all eligible secondary market transactions in U.S. Treasury securities to which it is a counterparty. The clearing mandate includes in its scope all repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements of such direct participants collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities (collectively, “Treasury repo transactions”) of a type accepted for clearing by a registered CCA, including both bilateral Treasury repo transactions and triparty Treasury repo transactions where a bank agent provides custody, collateral management and settlement services. |
The Treasury repo transactions of registered funds with any direct participants of a CCA will be subject to the mandatory clearing requirement. Currently, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) is the only CCA for U.S. Treasury securities. FICC currently operates a “Sponsored Program” for clearing of Treasury repo transactions pursuant to which a registered fund may enter into a clearing arrangement with a “sponsoring member” bank or broker-dealer that is a direct participant of FICC as a “sponsored member” of FICC. |
Compliance with the clearing mandate for Treasury repo transactions is scheduled to be required by June 30, 2026. The clearing mandate is expected to result in the Company being required to clear all or substantially all of its Treasury repo transactions as of the compliance date. There are currently substantial regulatory and operational uncertainties associated with the implementation which may affect the cost, terms and/or availability of cleared repo transactions. |
Reverse Repurchase Agreements and Dollar Rolls Risk. |
Swap Risk. |
which can result in a loss substantially greater than the amount invested in the swap itself. As a seller, the Company would be incurring a form of leverage. |
Provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act include capital and margin requirements and the mandatory use of clearinghouse mechanisms for many OTC derivative transactions. The CFTC, SEC and other federal regulators have adopted rules enacting the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. New requirements, even if not directly applicable to the Company, may affect the Company’s ability to enter into certain swap agreements. |
The swap market has matured in recent years with a large number of banks and investment banking firms acting both as principals and as agents utilizing standardized swap documentation. As a result, the swap market has become relatively liquid; however there is no guarantee that the swap market will continue to provide liquidity, and it could be subject to liquidity risk, which exists when a particular swap is difficult to purchase or sell. The absence of liquidity could also make it more difficult for the Company to ascertain a market value for such instruments. The inability to close derivative positions also could have an adverse impact on the Company’s ability to effectively hedge its portfolio. If the Adviser is incorrect in its forecasts of market values, interest rates or currency exchange rates, the investment performance of the Company would be less favorable than it would have been if these investment techniques were not used. In a total return swap, the Company pays the counterparty a floating short-term interest rate and receives in exchange the total return of underlying loans or debt securities. The Company bears the risk of default on the underlying loans or debt securities, based on the notional amount of the swap and, therefore, incurs a form of leverage. The Company would typically have to post collateral to cover this potential obligation. |
Options and Futures Risk. so-called “synthetic” options or other derivatives written by broker-dealers or other permissible financial intermediaries. Options transactions can be effected on exchanges or in the OTC market. When options are purchased OTC, the Company’s portfolio bears the risk that the counterparty that wrote the option will be unable or unwilling to perform its obligations under the option contract. Options can also be illiquid, and in such cases, the Company could have difficulty closing out its position. OTC options can also include options on baskets of specific securities. Options and futures also are subject to derivatives risks more generally. See “Risks – Derivatives Risk.” |
The Company will, from time to time, purchase call and put options on specific securities and write and sell covered or uncovered call and put options for hedging purposes in pursuing its investment objective. A put option gives the purchaser of the option the right to sell, and obligates the writer to buy, the underlying security at a stated exercise price, typically at any time prior to the expiration of the option for |
American options or only at expiration for European options. A call option gives the purchaser of the option the right to buy, and obligates the writer to sell, the underlying security at a stated exercise price, typically at any time prior to the expiration of the option. A covered call option is a call option with respect to which the seller of the option owns the underlying security. The sale of such an option exposes the seller during the term of the option to possible loss of opportunity to realize appreciation in the market price of the underlying security or to possible continued holding of a security that might otherwise have been sold to protect against depreciation in the market price of the security. |
The Company might close out a position when writing options by purchasing an option on the same underlying security with the same exercise price and expiration date as the option that it has previously written on the security. In such a case, the Company will realize a profit or loss if the amount paid to purchase an option is less or more than the amount received from the sale of the option. |
Engaging in transactions in futures contracts and options involves risk of loss to the Company. No assurance can be given that a liquid market will exist for any particular futures contract or option at any particular time. Many futures exchanges and boards of trade limit the amount of fluctuation permitted in futures contract prices during a single trading day. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made that day at a price beyond that limit or trading can be suspended for specified periods during the trading day. Futures contract prices could move to the limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, preventing prompt liquidation of futures positions and potentially subjecting the Company to substantial losses. |
A market could become unavailable if one or more exchanges were to stop trading options or it could become unavailable with respect to options on a particular underlying security if the exchanges stopped trading options on that security. In addition, a market could become temporarily unavailable if unusual events (e.g., volume exceeds clearing capability) were to interrupt normal exchange operations. If an options market were to become illiquid or otherwise unavailable, an option holder would be able to realize profits or limit losses only by exercising and an options seller or writer would remain obligated until it is assigned an exercise or until the option expires. |
If trading is interrupted in an underlying security, the trading of options on that security is usually halted as well. Holders and writers of options will then be unable to close out their positions until options trading resumes, and they could be faced with considerable losses if the security reopens at a substantially different price. Even if options trading is halted, holders of options will generally be able to exercise them. However, if trading has also been halted in the underlying security, option holders face the risk of exercising options without knowing the security’s current market value. If exercises do occur |
when trading of the underlying security is halted, the party required to deliver the underlying security could be unable to obtain it, which could necessitate a postponed settlement and/or the fixing of cash settlement prices. |
Counterparty and Prime Brokerage Risk. |
The Company is subject to the risk of loss of Company assets on deposit or being settled or cleared with a broker in the event of the broker’s insolvency, the insolvency of any clearing broker through which the broker executes and clears transactions on behalf of the Company, the insolvency of an exchange clearing house or the insolvency of any other counterparty. If a prime broker or counterparty becomes insolvent or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, the Company could experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative contract in a bankruptcy or other insolvency proceeding; if the Company’s claim is unsecured, the Company will be treated as a general creditor of such prime broker or counterparty and will not have any claim with respect to the underlying security. In the case of any such insolvency proceeding, the Company might recover, even in respect of property specifically traceable to the Company, only a pro rata share of all property available for distribution to all of the counterparty’s customers and counterparties. Such an amount could be less than the amounts owed to the Company. It is possible that the Company will obtain only a limited recovery or no recovery in such circumstances. Such events would have an adverse effect on the NAV of the Company. Certain counterparties have general custody of, or title to, the Company’s assets (including, without limitation, the Custodian). The failure of any such counterparty could result in adverse consequences to the NAV of the Company. |
Lender Liability Risk. |
owed to the Borrower or its other creditors or Shareholders. Because of the nature of its investments, the Company will, from time to time, be subject to allegations of lender liability. |
In addition, under common law principles that in some cases form the basis for lender liability claims, if a lender or bondholder (i) intentionally takes an action that results in the undercapitalization of a Borrower to the detriment of other creditors of such Borrower; (ii) engages in other inequitable conduct to the detriment of such other creditors; (iii) engages in fraud with respect to, or makes misrepresentations to, such other creditors; or (iv) uses its influence as a stockholder to dominate or control a Borrower to the detriment of other creditors of such Borrower, a court might elect to subordinate the claim of the offending lender or bondholder to the claims of the disadvantaged creditor or creditors, a remedy called “equitable subordination.” |
Because affiliates of, or persons related to, the Adviser will, at times, hold equity or other interests in obligors of the Company, the Company could be exposed to claims for equitable subordination or lender liability or both based on such equity or other holdings. |
Borrower Fraud; Covenant-Lite Loans; Breach of Covenant. |
Below Investment Grade Instruments Risk. |
make timely interest and principal payments. Below investment grade securities (sometimes referred to as “junk” securities) could be considered speculative investments. Such securities and instruments are generally not exchange-traded and, as a result, trade in the OTC marketplace, which is less transparent than the exchange-traded marketplace. Investments in high yield instruments create exposure to a substantial degree of credit risk and interest rate risk. The market values of certain of these lower-rated and unrated debt investments could reflect individual corporate developments to a greater extent and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions than those of higher-rated investments, which react primarily to fluctuations in the general level of interest rates. Companies that issue such securities are often highly leveraged and might not have available to them more traditional methods of financing. General economic recession or a major decline in the demand for products and services in which the borrower operates would likely have a materially adverse impact on the value of such securities and the ability of the issuers of such securities to repay principal and interest thereon, thereby increasing the incidence of default of such securities. In addition, adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, could also decrease the value and liquidity of these high yield debt investments. |
Rating Agency Risk. |
Because such credit ratings of the ratings agencies may not always reflect current conditions and events, the Adviser may supplement such credit ratings with its own independent and ongoing review of credit quality. Because of this, the Company’s performance may depend in part on the Adviser’s own credit analysis. |
Stressed and Distressed Investments Risk. |
the prospects for a successful reorganization or similar action in respect of any company. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a company in which the Company invests, the Company could lose its entire investment, could be required to accept cash or securities with a value less than the Company’s original investment and/or could be required to accept payment over an extended period of time. Troubled company investments and other distressed asset-based investments require active monitoring. |
Risk of Investments in Highly Leveraged Companies. |
Distressed Debt, Litigation, Bankruptcy and Other Proceedings. |
Company in a related litigation. Such litigation can be time-consuming and expensive and can frequently lead to unpredicted delays or losses. Litigation expenses, including payments pursuant to settlements or judgments, generally will be borne by the Company. |
From time to time, the Adviser will make investments for the Company in companies involved in bankruptcy proceedings. There are a number of significant risks when investing in companies involved in bankruptcy proceedings, and many events in a bankruptcy |
are the product of contested matters and adversary proceedings which are beyond the control of the creditors. A bankruptcy filing could have adverse and permanent effects on a company. Further, if the proceeding is converted to a liquidation, the liquidation value of the company might not equal the liquidation value that was believed to exist at the time of the investment. In addition, the duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is difficult to predict. A creditor’s return on investment can be impacted adversely by delays while the plan of reorganization is being negotiated, approved by the creditors and confirmed by the bankruptcy court, and until it ultimately becomes effective. Certain claims, such as claims for taxes, wages and certain trade claims, could have priority by law over the claims of certain creditors and administrative costs in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding are frequently high and will be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors. |
Certain investments of the Company could be subject to federal bankruptcy law and state fraudulent transfer laws, which vary from state to state, if the debt obligations relating to such investments were issued with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or, in certain circumstances, if the issuer receives less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for issuing such debt obligations. If the debt is used for a buyout of Shareholders, this risk is greater than if the debt proceeds are used for day-to-day |
Under certain circumstances, payments to the Company could be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment or similar transaction under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, investments in restructurings could be adversely affected by statutes relating to, among other things, fraudulent conveyances, voidable preferences, lender liability and the court’s discretionary power to disallow, subordinate or disenfranchise particular claims or recharacterize investments made in the form of debt as equity contributions. |
Under Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a lender that has inappropriately exercised control of the management and policies of a company that is a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code could have its claims against the company subordinated or disallowed or could be found liable for damages suffered by parties as a result of such actions. Such claims could also be |
disallowed or subordinated to the claims of other creditors if the lender (e.g., the Company) (i) is found to have engaged in other inequitable conduct resulting in harm to other parties, (ii) intentionally takes action that results in the undercapitalization of a borrower, (iii) engages in fraud with respect to, or makes misrepresentations to other creditors, or (iv) uses its influence as a Shareholder to dominate or control a borrower to the detriment of other creditors of such borrower. The lender’s investment could also be recharacterized or treated as equity if it is deemed to be a contribution to capital, or if the lender attempts to control the outcome of the business affairs of a company prior to its filing under the Bankruptcy Code. While the Company attempts to avoid taking the types of action that would lead to the subordination, disallowance and liability described above, there can be no assurance that such claims will not be asserted or that the Company will be able successfully to defend against them. |
From time to time, the Company seeks to place its representatives on the boards of certain companies in which the Company has invested. The Company could also invest in companies in which KKR and/or other KKR clients or accounts will have representatives on the boards of such companies. While such representation could enable the Company to enhance the sale value of its debt investments in a company, such involvement (and/or an equity stake by the Company, KKR or other KKR clients or accounts in such company) could also prevent the Company from freely disposing of its debt investments and could subject the Company to additional liability or result in recharacterization of the Company’s debt investments as equity. The Company attempts to balance the advantages and disadvantages of such representation when deciding whether and how to exercise its rights with respect to such companies, but the exercise of such rights could produce adverse consequences in particular situations. |
Insofar as the Company’s portfolio includes obligations of non-U.S. obligors, the laws of certain foreign jurisdictions could provide for avoidance remedies under factual circumstances similar to those described above or under different circumstances, with consequences that might or might not be analogous to those described above under U.S. federal or state laws. Changes in bankruptcy laws (including U.S. federal and state laws and applicable non-U.S. laws) could adversely impact the Company’s securities. |
Convertible Securities Risk. |
than comparable non-convertible securities; (ii) are less subject to fluctuation in value than the underlying common stock due to their fixed-income characteristics; and (iii) provide the potential for capital appreciation if the market price of the underlying common stock increases. |
The value of a convertible security is a function of its “investment value” (determined by its yield in comparison with the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege) and its “conversion value” (the security’s worth, at market value, if converted into the underlying common stock). The investment value of a convertible security is influenced by changes in interest rates, with investment value declining as interest rates increase and increasing as interest rates decline. The credit standing of the issuer and other factors also could have an effect on the convertible security’s investment value. The conversion value of a convertible security is determined by the market price of the underlying common stock. If the conversion value is low relative to the investment value, the price of the convertible security is governed principally by its investment value. To the extent the market price of the underlying common stock approaches or exceeds the conversion price, the price of the convertible security will be increasingly influenced by its conversion value. A convertible security generally will sell at a premium over its conversion value by the extent to which investors place value on the right to acquire the underlying common stock while holding a fixed-income instrument. Generally, the amount of the premium decreases as the convertible security approaches maturity. Although under normal market conditions longer-term convertible debt securities have greater yields than do shorter-term convertible debt securities of similar quality, they are subject to greater price fluctuations. |
Non-Controlling Equity Investments; Investments in Equity Securities; Investments and Joint Ventures with Third Parties. non-controlling equity investments and investments in equity and equity-linked securities. The value of equity securities, including common stock, preferred stock and convertible stock, will fluctuate in response to factors affecting the particular company, as well as broader market and economic conditions. Prices of equity securities fluctuate for many reasons, including changes in investors’ perceptions of the financial condition of an issuer or the general condition of the relevant stock market, or when political or economic events affecting the issuer occur. Moreover, in the event of a company’s bankruptcy, claims of certain creditors, including bondholders, will have priority over claims of common stockholders and are likely to have varying types of priority over holders of preferred and convertible stock. These risks could increase fluctuations in the Company’s NAV. If the Company’s investments in equity securities are incidental to the Company’s investments in loans or fixed-income instruments, the Company |
frequently could possess material non-public information about a Borrower or issuer as a result of its ownership of a loan or fixed-income instrument of a Borrower or issuer. Because of prohibitions on trading in securities while in possession of material non-public information, the Company might be unable to enter into a transaction in a security of the Borrower or issuer when it would otherwise be advantageous to do so. |
The Company also could be exposed to risks that issuers will not fulfill contractual obligations such as, in the case of convertible instruments or private placements, delivering marketable common stock upon conversions of convertible instruments and registering restricted securities for public resale. With respect to non-controlling equity investments, the Company could have a limited ability to protect its position in such investments. |
From time to time, the Company will also co-invest with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, thereby acquiring jointly-controlled or non-controlling interests in certain investments in conjunction with participation by one or more third parties in such investment. As a co-investor, the Company could have interests or objectives that are inconsistent with those of the third-party partners or co-venturers. Although the Company might not have full control over these investments and, therefore, could have a limited ability to protect its position therein, the Adviser expects that appropriate rights will be negotiated to protect the Company’s interests. Nevertheless, such investments can involve risks not present in investments where a third party is not involved, including the possibility that a third-party partner or co-venturer could have financial difficulties resulting in a negative impact on such investment, could have economic or business interests or goals which are inconsistent with those of the Company, or could be in a position to take (or block) action in a manner contrary to the Company’s investment objective or the increased possibility of default by, diminished liquidity or insolvency of, the third party, due to a sustained or general economic downturn. Third-party partners or co-venturers could opt to liquidate an investment at a time during which such liquidation is not optimal for the Company. In addition, the Company could in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of its third-party partners or co-venturers. In those circumstances where such third parties involve a management group, such third parties could receive compensation arrangements relating to such investments, including incentive compensation arrangements. Additionally, the Company’s joint venture investments may be held on an unconsolidated basis and at times may be highly leveraged. Such leverage would not count toward the investment limits imposed on the Company by the 1940 Act. |
U.S. Government Debt Securities Risk. |
yields available from U.S. government debt securities are generally lower than the yields available from other securities. Like other debt securities, however, the values of U.S. government securities change as interest rates fluctuate. Fluctuations in the value of portfolio securities will not affect interest income on existing portfolio securities but will be reflected in the Company’s NAV. Since the magnitude of these fluctuations will generally be greater at times when the Company’s average maturity is longer, under certain market conditions the Company will for temporary defensive purposes, accept lower current income from short-term investments rather than investing in higher yielding long-term securities. In 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (the “FHFA”) placed the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) into conservatorship. As conservator, FHFA succeeded to all rights, titles, powers and privileges of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and of any stockholder, officer or director of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the assets of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are continuing to operate as going concerns while in conservatorship and each remains liable for all of its respective obligations, including guaranty obligations, associated with its mortgage-backed securities. There is no assurance that the obligations of such entities will be satisfied in full, or that such obligations will not lose value or default. Any Company investments issued by Federal Home Loan Banks and Fannie Mae could ultimately lose value. Further, the U.S. government and its agencies and instrumentalities do not guarantee the market value of their securities; consequently, the value of such securities will fluctuate. This may be the case especially when there is any controversy or ongoing uncertainty regarding the status of negotiations in the U.S. Congress to increase the statutory debt ceiling. If the U.S. Congress is unable to negotiate an adjustment to the statutory debt ceiling, there is also the risk that the U.S. government may default on payments on certain U.S. government securities, including those held by the Company, which could have a material negative impact on the Company. |
LIBOR Replacement and Floating Rate Benchmark Risk. |
Although the transition process away from LIBOR has become generally well-defined, there remains uncertainty regarding the nature of alternative floating rate benchmarks, the continued utilization of synthetic LIBOR and the remaining work to be done in connection |
with the LIBOR transition. LIBOR’s replacement could lead to significant short-term and long-term uncertainty and market instability. Developments around LIBOR’s replacement or the adoption of alternative floating rate benchmarks, including the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), reference rates based on SOFR, the Euro InterBank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”), and the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”), could negatively impact financial markets in general and present heightened risks, including with respect to the Company’s investments. No single alternative floating rate benchmark has replaced LIBOR and no alternative floating rate benchmark (including SOFR, reference rates based on SOFR, EURIBOR and SONIA) performs in the same way that LIBOR did, which may further impact the Company’s investments. As a result of this uncertainty and developments relating to the transition process, the Company and its investments may be adversely affected. |
Legal and Regulatory Risk. non-U.S. securities and futures markets and investment funds such as the Company has undergone substantial change in recent years, and such change could continue. |
It is unknown in what form, when and in what order significant regulatory initiatives will be implemented or the impact any such implemented regulations will have on the Company, the markets or instruments in which the Company invests or the counterparties with which the Company conducts business. The effect of regulatory change on the Company, while impossible to predict, could be substantial, adverse and potentially limit or completely restrict the ability of the Company to implement its investment strategy or increase the costs of using certain instruments or make them less effective. In addition, the practice of short selling has been the subject of numerous temporary restrictions, and similar restrictions could be promulgated at any time. Such restrictions could adversely affect the returns of the Company. |
Event Driven Investing Risk. |
it, resulting in losses to investors. In liquidations and other forms of corporate reorganization, the risk exists that the reorganization either will be unsuccessful, will be delayed or will result in a distribution of cash or a new security, the value of which will be less than the purchase price to the Company of the investment in respect of which such distribution was made. |
Valuation Risk. |
Liquidity Risk. |
Illiquid and restricted securities can be difficult to dispose of at a fair price at the times when the Company believes it is desirable to do so. The market price of illiquid and restricted securities generally is more volatile than that of more liquid securities, which could adversely affect the price that the Company pays for or recovers upon the sale of such securities. Illiquid and restricted securities are also more difficult to value, especially in challenging markets, and the Adviser’s judgment will play a greater role in the valuation process. Investment of the Company’s assets in illiquid and restricted securities could restrict the Company’s ability to take advantage of market opportunities. In order to dispose of an unregistered security, the |
Company, where it has contractual rights to do so, could have to cause such security to be registered. A considerable period could elapse between the time the decision is made to sell the security and the time the security is registered, thereby enabling the Company to sell it. Contractual restrictions on the resale of securities vary in length and scope and are generally the result of a negotiation between the issuer and acquiror of the securities. In either case, the Company would bear market risks during that period. |
Some loans and fixed-income instruments are not readily marketable and could be subject to restrictions on resale. Loans and fixed-income instruments might not be listed on any national securities exchange and no active trading market might exist for certain of the loans and fixed-income instruments in which the Company invests. Where a secondary market exists, the market for some loans and fixed-income instruments could be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods. In addition, events occurring subsequent to an investment by the Company, including, for example, withdrawals, changes in market, political or other relevant circumstances, could cause some loans and fixed-income instruments that were liquid at the time of acquisition to become illiquid or otherwise cause the Company’s concentration in illiquid investments to increase. |
Inflation/Deflation Risk. |
Deflation risk is the risk that prices throughout the economy decline over time—the opposite of inflation. Deflation could have an adverse effect on the creditworthiness of issuers and could make issuer defaults more likely, which could result in a decline in the value of the Company’s portfolio. |
Investment Funds Risk. |
affiliated transaction restrictions, leverage limitations, public disclosure requirements and custody requirements. |
The Company relies primarily on information provided by managers of private investment funds in valuing its investments in such funds. There is a risk that inaccurate valuations provided by managers of private investment funds could adversely affect the value of the Company’s shares. In addition, there can be no assurance that a manager of a private investment fund will provide advance notice of any material change in such private investment fund’s investment program or policies and thus, the Company’s investment portfolio may be subject to additional risks which may not be promptly identified by the Adviser. Moreover, the Company may not be able to withdraw its investments in certain private investment funds promptly after the Company makes a decision to do so, which may result in a loss to the Company and adversely affect its investment returns. |
Investments in the securities of private investment funds may also involve duplication of advisory fees and certain other expenses. Shareholders of the Company bear a pro rata portion of the Company’s advisory fees and other expenses, and also indirectly bear a pro rata portion of the advisory fees, performance-based allocations and other expenses borne by the Company as an investor in private investment funds. In addition, the purchase of the shares of some private investment funds requires the payment of sales loads and (in the case of closed-end investment companies) sometimes substantial premiums above the value of such investment companies’ portfolio securities. In addition, certain private investment funds may subject the Company to liquidity risk. |
Conflicts of Interest Risk. |
In addition, the Adviser’s investment professionals will, from time to time, acquire confidential or material, non-public information concerning an entity in which the Company has invested, or propose to invest, and the possession of such information generally will limit the Adviser’s ability to buy or sell particular securities of such entity on behalf of the Company, thereby limiting the investment opportunities or exit strategies available to the Company. In addition, holdings in the securities of an issuer by the Adviser or its affiliates |
will affect the ability of the Company to make certain acquisitions of, or enter into certain transactions with, such issuer. From time to time, broker-dealers and investment advisers affiliated with the Adviser will also acquire confidential or material non-public information concerning entities in which the Company has invested or proposes to invest, which could restrict the Adviser’s ability to buy or sell (or otherwise transact in) securities of such entities, thus limiting investment opportunities or exit strategies available to the Company. See “Conflicts of Interest.” |
Uncertain Tax Treatment. |
Complex Transactions/Contingent Liabilities/Guarantees and Indemnities. |
Availability of Investment Opportunities; Competition. |
The Company competes for investment opportunities with other investment companies and private investment vehicles, as well as the |
public debt markets, individuals and financial institutions, including investment banks, commercial banks and insurance companies, business development companies, strategic industry acquirers, hedge funds and other institutional investors, investing directly or through affiliates. Over the past several years, a number of such investment vehicles have been formed (and many such existing entities have grown in size). Additional entities with similar investment objectives could be formed in the future by other unrelated parties. It is possible that competition for appropriate investment opportunities could increase, thus reducing the number of opportunities available to the Company. Such supply-side competition could adversely affect the terms upon which investments can be made by the Company. Moreover, transaction sponsors unaffiliated with the Company or KKR could be reluctant to present investment opportunities to the Company because of its affiliation with KKR. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will be able to locate and complete investments which satisfy the Company’s primary investment objective or to realize upon their values. |
Dependence on Key Personnel Risk. |
The Adviser’s principals and other key personnel possess substantial experience and expertise and have strong business relationships with members of the business community. The loss of these personnel could jeopardize the Adviser’s relationships with members of the business community and could result in fewer investment opportunities for the Company. For example, if any of the Adviser’s principals were to join or form a competing firm, the Company’s results and financial condition could suffer. |
Material Risks of Significant Methods of Analysis. |
investments for the Company being successful. There can be no assurance that the projected results of an investment opportunity will be achieved for the Company, and actual results could vary significantly from the projections. General economic, natural, and other conditions, which are not predictable, can have an adverse impact on the reliability of such projections. Assumptions or projections about asset lives; the stability, growth, or predictability of costs; demand; or revenues generated by an investment or other factors associated therewith could, due to various risks and uncertainties including those described herein, differ materially from actual results. |
Market Developments. |
For example, certain Borrowers could, due to macroeconomic conditions, be unable to repay secured loans. A Borrower’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of the secured loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the Borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under its debt securities. The Company will, from time to time, incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting Borrower. In addition, if one of the Borrowers were to commence bankruptcy proceedings, even though the Company will have structured its interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize the Company’s debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of its claim to that of other creditors. Adverse economic conditions also could decrease the value of collateral securing some of the Company’s loans and the value of its equity investments. A recession could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and the value of the Company’s assets. |
These developments could increase the volatility of the value of securities owned by the Company. These developments also could make it more difficult for the Company to accurately value its securities or to sell its securities on a timely basis. These developments could adversely affect the ability of the Company to use leverage for investment purposes and increase the cost of such leverage, which would reduce returns to the holders of shares. These developments also could adversely affect the broader economy, which |
in turn could adversely affect the ability of issuers of securities owned by the Company to make payments of principal and interest when due, leading to lower credit ratings of the issuer and increased defaults by the issuer. Such developments could, in turn, reduce the value of securities owned by the Company and adversely affect the NAV of the Shares. |
Recent Developments in the Banking Sector. |
Banks and other financial institutions, including those that could undergo Distress Events could provide credit facilities and/or other forms of financing to the Company or its portfolio companies. There can be no assurance that such financial institutions will honor their obligations as creditors or that another financial institution would be willing and able to provide replacement financing or similar capabilities and on similar terms. |
If a financial institution closes, whether as a result of a Distress Event or otherwise, there is no guarantee that its uninsured depositors, which could include the Company and/or its portfolio companies, will be made whole or, even if made whole, that such deposits will become available for withdrawal in short order. Pursuant to statute, U.S. bank accounts are insured by the FDIC in an amount up to $250,000. While the U.S. government has considered raising that limit, there can be no guarantee that such limit will be increased. As a consequence, for example, if a Distress Event occurs, the Company or portfolio companies could be delayed or prevented from accessing a portion or all of their bank accounts or making required payments under their debt or other contractual obligations. |
Distress Events could have a potentially adverse effect on the ability of the Adviser to manage the Company and its investments, and on the ability of the Adviser, the Company and any portfolio company to maintain operations, which in each case could result in significant losses and in unconsummated investment acquisitions and |
dispositions. Such losses could include: a loss of funds; an obligation to pay fees and expenses in the event the Company is not able to close a transaction (whether due to the inability to draw capital on a credit line provided by a financial institution experiencing a Distress Event, the inability of the Company to access capital contributions or otherwise); the inability of the Company to acquire or dispose of investments, or acquire or dispose of such investments at prices that the Adviser believes reflect the fair value of such investments; and the inability of portfolio companies to make payroll, fulfill obligations or maintain operations. If a Distress Event leads to a loss of access to a financial institution’s services, it is also possible that the Company or a portfolio company will incur additional expenses or delays in putting in place alternative arrangements or that such alternative arrangements will be less favorable than those formerly in place (with respect to economic terms, service levels, access to capital, or otherwise). Although the Adviser expects to exercise contractual remedies under agreements with financial institutions in the event of a Distress Event, there can be no assurance that such remedies will be successful or avoid losses or delays. The Company and its portfolio companies are subject to similar risks if any financial institution utilized by investors in the Company or by suppliers, vendors, service providers or other counterparties of the Company or a portfolio company becomes subject to a Distress Event, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. |
Many financial institutions require, as a condition to using their services (including lending services), that the Adviser and/or the Company maintain all or a set amount or percentage of their respective accounts or assets with the financial institution, which heightens the risks associated with a Distress Event with respect to such financial institutions. Although the Adviser seeks to do business with financial institutions that it believes are creditworthy and capable of fulfilling their respective obligations to the Company, the Adviser is under no obligation to use a minimum number of financial institutions with respect to the Company or to maintain account balances at or below the relevant insured amounts. |
Uncertainty caused by recent bank failures—and general concern regarding the financial health and outlook for other financial institutions—could have an overall negative effect on banking systems and financial markets generally. The recent developments could also have other implications for broader economic and monetary policy, including interest rate policy. For the foregoing reasons, there can be no assurances that conditions in the banking sector and in global financial markets will not worsen and/or adversely affect the Company or one or more of its portfolio investments or its overall performance. |
Market Disruptions from Natural Disasters or Geopolitical Risks. |
around the world, natural and environmental disasters, social and political discord, debt crises (such as the Greek crisis), sovereign debt downgrades, or the exit or potential exit of one or more countries from the EU (such as the UK) or the European Economic and Monetary Union, among others, could result in market volatility, could have long term effects on the United States and worldwide financial markets, and could cause further economic uncertainties in the United States and worldwide. The Company cannot predict the effects of natural disasters or geopolitical events in the future on the economy and securities markets. |
Government Intervention in the Financial Markets. COVID-19 outbreak. Federal, state, and other governments, their regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations could take additional actions that affect the regulation of the securities in which the Company invests, or the issuers of such securities, in ways that are unforeseeable. Borrowers under secured loans held by the Company could seek protection under the bankruptcy laws. Legislation or regulation could also change the way in which the Company itself is regulated. Such legislation or regulation could limit or preclude the Company’s ability to achieve its investment objective. The Adviser monitors developments and seeks to manage the Company’s portfolio in a manner consistent with achieving the Company’s investment objective, but there can be no assurance that it will be successful in doing so. |
Portfolio Turnover Risk. |
Duration Risk. |
of time until the security matures. The duration of a security will be expected to change over time with changes in market factors and time to maturity. |
Risks Relating to Company’s RIC Status. source-of-income, tax-exempt income (if any) to its Shareholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a RIC for any reason and becomes subject to corporate tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce its net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of its distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on the Company and its Shareholders. In addition, the Company could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest and make substantial distributions in order to re-qualify as a RIC. |
RIC-Related Risks of Investments Generating Non-Cash Taxable Income. |
borrow, raise additional equity capital, make taxable distributions of its Shares or debt securities, or reduce new investments, to obtain the cash needed to make these income distributions. If the Company liquidates assets to raise cash, the Company will, from time to time, realize gain or loss on such liquidations; in the event the Company realizes net capital gains from such liquidation transactions, its Shareholders could receive larger capital gain distributions than they would in the absence of such transactions. |
Cybersecurity Risks. |
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Developments Risk. |
Use of Machine Learning Technology by any of the parties described in the previous paragraph could include the input of confidential information (including material non-public information)—either by third parties in contravention of non-disclosure agreements, or by KKR personnel or the aforementioned KKR advisors and affiliates in contravention of KKR’s policies—into Machine Learning Technology applications, resulting in such confidential information becoming part of a dataset that is accessible by other third-party Machine Learning Technology applications and users. |
Independent of its context of use, Machine Learning Technology is generally highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, and it is not possible or practicable to incorporate all relevant data into the model that Machine Learning Technology utilizes to operate. Certain data in such models will inevitably contain a degree of inaccuracy and error – potentially materially so – and could otherwise be inadequate or flawed, which would be likely to degrade the effectiveness of Machine Learning Technology. To the extent that KKR, the Company or the Company’s portfolio companies are exposed to the risks of Machine Learning Technology use, any such inaccuracies or errors could have adverse impacts on KKR, the Company or the Company’s portfolio companies. |
Machine Learning Technology and its applications, including in the financial sector, continue to develop rapidly, and it is impossible to predict the future risks that may arise from such developments. |
Private and Middle Market Companies Risk. |
• | these companies could have limited financial resources and limited access to additional financing, which could increase the risk of their defaulting on their obligations, leaving creditors dependent on any guarantees or collateral they have obtained; |
• | these companies frequently have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns; |
• | there will not be as much information publicly available about these companies as would be available for public companies and such information might not be of the same quality; |
• | these companies are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; as a result, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on these companies’ ability to meet their obligations; and |
• | the frequency and volume of the trading of these companies generally is substantially less than is typical of larger companies and as such it could be more difficult for the Company to exit the investment in the company at its then fair value. |
Risks Arising from Purchases of Debt on a Secondary Basis. |
Loan Origination Risk. |
Zero Coupon and PIK Bonds Risk. “payment-in-kind” |
Non-Diversified Company Risk“non-diversified” investment company for purposes of the 1940 Act, which means that the Company is not subject to limitations under the 1940 Act on the percentage of its assets that may be invested in the securities of any one issuer. The Company’s NAV may therefore be subject to greater volatility than that of an investment company that is subject to such a limitation on diversification. |
Leverage Risk . |
that the prices of portfolio securities will fall (or rise) if market interest rates for those types of securities rise (or fall). As a result, leverage can cause greater changes in the Company’s NAV, which will be borne entirely by the Shareholders. |
Under the 1940 Act, the Company generally may not (1) borrow money in an amount greater than 33 1/3% of the Company’s net assets or (2) issue preferred shares in an amount, when aggregated with any indebtedness outstanding, greater than 50% of the Company’s net assets. |
The Company may also enter into derivative and similar transactions for hedging or investment purposes that may represent a form of economic leverage and will create risks. The potential loss on derivative instruments can be substantial relative to the initial investment therein. The SEC rule related to the use of derivatives, reverse repurchase agreements and certain other transactions by registered investment companies requires the Company to trade derivatives and other transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations (except reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions) subject to value-at-risk non-standard settlement cycle, and the transaction will be deemed not to involve a senior security, provided that (i) the Company intends to physically settle the transaction and (ii) the transaction will settle within 35 days of its trade date (the “Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision”). The Company may otherwise engage in such transactions that do not meet the conditions of the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision so long as the Company treats any such transaction as a “derivatives transaction” for purposes of compliance with the rule. Furthermore, under the rule, the Company will be permitted to enter into an |
unfunded commitment agreement, and such unfunded commitment agreement will not be subject to the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act, if the Company reasonably believes, at the time it enters into such agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all such agreements as they come due. |
Limitations on Transfer and Liquidity Risks . |
Repurchase Risks. be pro-rated downward. In that case, Shareholders will have to wait until the next repurchase offer, if any, to make another repurchase request. As a result, Shareholders could be unable to liquidate all or a given percentage of their investment in the Company during a particular repurchase offer. Some Shareholders, in anticipation of proration, may tender more Shares than they wish to have repurchased in a particular repurchase offer, thereby increasing the likelihood that proration will occur. Between the date specified in the notice describing the terms of the repurchase offer (the “Notice Due Date”) and the date on which the NAV for tendered Shares is determined, the Company is subject to market and other risks and the NAV of Shares tendered in a repurchase offer could decline. In addition, the repurchase of Shares by the Company is generally a taxable event to Shareholders. repurchase of Shares by the Company is generally a taxable event to Shareholders. |
through repurchases will result in an increased expense ratio for Shareholders who do not tender their Shares for repurchase, will result in untimely sales of portfolio securities (with associated imputed transaction costs, which could be significant) and will limit the ability of the Company to participate in new investment opportunities or to achieve its investment objective. If at any time cash and other liquid assets held by the Company are not sufficient to meet the Company’s repurchase obligations, the Company intends, if necessary, to sell investments. The Company, at its discretion, may choose to satisfy all or any portion of the amounts due to a shareholder in connection with any tender offer through an in-kind distribution of its assets. In addition, if the Company borrows to finance repurchases, interest on that borrowing will negatively affect Shareholders who do not tender their Shares by increasing the Company’s expenses and reducing any net investment income. |
Shareholder Transaction Expenses: |
||||
Maximum Sales Load ( |
Annual Expenses ( |
||||
Management Fee 1 |
% | |||
Interest Payments on Borrowed Funds 2 |
% | |||
Other Expenses 3 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Company Operating Expenses |
% |
1 |
|
2 |
Interest payments on borrowed funds is estimated based on historical usage. The Company’s actual interest costs associated with leverage may differ from the estimate above. |
3 |
|
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
|||||||||||||
Total Expenses Incurred |
$ | $ | $ | $ |
1 |
The example should not be considered a representation of future expenses. Actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown. |
Assumed Return on Portfolio (net of expenses) |
(10.00 | )% | (5.00 | )% | 0.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Share Total Return |
( |
)% | ( |
)% | ( |
)% | % | % |
• | these companies could have limited financial resources and limited access to additional financing, which could increase the risk of their defaulting on their obligations, leaving creditors dependent on any guarantees or collateral they have obtained; |
• | these companies frequently have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns; |
• | there will not be as much information publicly available about these companies as would be available for public companies and such information might not be of the same quality; |
• | these companies are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; as a result, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on these companies’ ability to meet their obligations; and |
• | the frequency and volume of the trading of these companies generally is substantially less than is typical of larger companies and as such it could be more difficult for the Company to exit the investment in the company at its then fair value. |
• | the Shares have been transferred in violation of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, or has vested in any person other than by operation of law as a result of the death, divorce, dissolution, bankruptcy, insolvency or adjudicated incompetence of the Shareholder; |
• | ownership of the Shares by a Shareholder or other person is likely to cause the Company to be in violation of, or require registration of the Shares under, or subject the Company to additional registration or regulation under, the securities, commodities, or other laws of the U.S. or any other relevant jurisdiction; |
• | continued ownership of the Shares by a Shareholder may be harmful or injurious to the business or reputation of the Company, the Board, KKR, or any of their affiliates, or may subject the Company or any Shareholder to an undue risk of adverse tax or other fiscal or regulatory consequences; |
• | any of the representations and warranties made by a Shareholder or other person in connection with the acquisition of Shares were not true when made or has ceased to be true; or |
• | with respect to a Shareholder subject to special laws or compliance requirements, such as those imposed by ERISA, the Bank Holding Company Act or certain Federal Communication Commission regulations (collectively, “Special Laws or Regulations”), the Shareholder is likely to be subject to additional regulatory or compliance requirements under these Special Laws or Regulations by virtue of continuing to hold any Shares. |
• | the Company has declared and paid (or provided to the relevant dividend paying agent) all cumulative distributions on the Company’s outstanding preferred shares due on or prior to the date of such common shares dividend or distribution; |
• | the Company has redeemed the full number of preferred shares to be redeemed pursuant to any mandatory redemption provision in the Company’s governing documents; and |
• | after making the distribution, the Company meets applicable asset coverage requirements. |
• | The members, officers and other personnel of the Adviser allocate their time, resources and other services between the Company and other investment and business activities in which they are involved, including other funds, investment vehicles and accounts managed by KKR. The Adviser intends to devote such time as shall be necessary to conduct the Company’s business affairs in an appropriate manner. However, the Adviser will continue to devote the time, resources and other services necessary to managing its other investment and business activities, and the Adviser is not precluded from conducting activities unrelated to the Company. Substantial time will be spent by such members, officers and personnel monitoring the investments of other funds, investment vehicles and accounts managed by KKR. |
• | The Adviser will, at times, compete with certain of its affiliates, including other entities it manages, for investments for the Company, subjecting the Adviser to certain conflicts of interest in evaluating the suitability of investment opportunities and making or recommending acquisitions on the Company’s behalf. The Adviser will receive advisory and other fees from the other entities it manages, and due to fee-offset provisions contained in the management agreements for such entities, the fees, at times, will not be proportionate to such entities’ investment accounts for any given transaction and the Adviser will have an incentive to favor entities from which it receives higher fees. |
• | The Company has adopted the Adviser’s allocation policy, which is designed to fairly and equitably distribute investment opportunities over time among funds or pools of capital managed by the Adviser, which may include proprietary accounts, including investment or co-investment vehicles established for personnel of KKR or its affiliates. The Adviser’s allocation policy provides that once an investment has been approved and is deemed to be in the Company’s best interest, the Company will receive a pro rata share of the investment based on capital available for investment in the asset class being allocated. Determinations as to the amount of capital available for investment are based on such factors as: the amount of cash on-hand, existing commitments and reserves, the targeted leverage level, the targeted asset mix and diversification requirements, other investment policies and restrictions and limitations imposed by applicable laws, rules, regulations or interpretations. The outcome of this determination will result in the allocation of all, some or none of an investment opportunity to the Company. In addition, subject to applicable law, affiliates of the Adviser will, from time to time, invest in one of the Company’s portfolio companies and hold a different class of securities than the Company. To the extent that an affiliate of the Adviser holds a different class of securities than the Company, its interests might not be aligned with the Company’s. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Adviser will act in the best interest of the Company in accordance with its fiduciary duty to the Company. |
• | The appropriate allocation among the Company and other KKR funds and accounts of expenses and fees generated in the course of evaluating and making investments often will not be clear, especially where more than one KKR fund or account participates. The Adviser will determine, in its sole discretion, the appropriate allocation of investment-related expenses, including broken deal expenses incurred in respect of unconsummated investments and expenses more generally relating to a particular investment strategy, among the funds and accounts participating or that would have participated in such investments or that otherwise participate in the relevant investment strategy, as applicable, which could result in the Company bearing more or less of these expenses than other participants or potential participants in the relevant investments. |
• | The compensation payable by the Company to the Adviser will be approved by the Board consistent with the exercise of the requisite standard of care applicable to directors under state law. Such compensation is payable, in most cases, regardless of the quality of the assets acquired, the services provided to the Company or whether the Company makes distributions to Shareholders. |
• | The Adviser and its affiliates will, at times, provide a broad range of financial services to companies in which the Company invests, in compliance with applicable law, and will generally be paid fees for such services. In addition, affiliates of the Adviser could act as an underwriter or placement agent in connection with an offering of securities by one of the companies in the Company’s portfolio. Any compensation received by the Adviser and its affiliates for providing these services will not be shared with the Company and could be received before the Company realizes a return on its investment. The Adviser will face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for these companies, on the one hand, and investments recommended to the Company, on the other hand. |
• | KKR engages in a broad range of business activities and invests in portfolio companies and other issuers whose operations could be substantially similar to the issuers of the Company’s portfolio investments. The performance and operation of such competing businesses could conflict with and adversely affect the performance and operation of the issuers of the Company’s portfolio investments and could adversely affect the prices and availability of business opportunities or transactions available to these issuers. |
• | From time to time, to the extent consistent with the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or with exemptive relief the Company receives from the SEC, if any, the Company and other clients for which the Adviser provides investment management services or carries on investment activities (including, among others, clients that are employee benefit plans subject to ERISA and related regulations) will make investments at different levels of an investment entity’s capital structure or otherwise in different classes of an issuer’s securities. These investments inherently give rise to conflicts of interest or perceived conflicts of interest between or among the various classes of securities held by the Company and such other clients, including in the case of financial distress of the investment entity. |
• | KKR and the Adviser sponsor and advise, and expect in the future to sponsor and advise, a broad range of investment funds, vehicles and other accounts, including proprietary vehicles, that make investments worldwide. KKR will, from time to time, also make investments for its own account, including, for example, through investment and co-investment vehicles established for KKR personnel and associates. The Adviser and its affiliates are not restricted from forming additional investment funds, from entering into other investment advisory relationships (including, among others, relationships with clients that are employee benefit plans subject to ERISA and related regulations) or from engaging in other business activities, even to the extent such activities are in competition with the Company and/or involve substantial time and resources of the Adviser. For example, the Adviser could invest, on behalf of an affiliated fund, in a company that is a competitor of one of the Company’s portfolio companies or that is a service provider, supplier, customer or other counterparty with respect to one of the Company’s portfolio companies or the Adviser could, on behalf of other entities it manages, acquire assets originated by, or provide financing to, portfolio companies and other issuers in which the Company invests. In providing advice and recommendations to, or with respect to, such investments and in dealing in such investments on behalf of such other affiliated fund, to the extent permitted by law, the Adviser or its affiliates will not take into consideration the interests of the Company and its portfolio investments and issuers thereof. Accordingly, such advice, recommendations and dealings will result in conflicts of interest for the Adviser. In addition, the Adviser’s ability to effectively implement the Company’s investment strategies will be limited to the extent that contractual obligations relating to these permitted activities restrict the Adviser’s ability to engage in transactions that it would otherwise be interested in pursuing. Affiliates of the Adviser, whose primary business includes the origination of investments, engage in investment advisory business with accounts that compete with the Company. |
• | The Adviser and its affiliates will, from time to time, give advice and recommend securities to other clients that differs from, or is contrary to, advice given to or securities recommended or bought for the Company even though their investment objectives are similar to the Company’s. |
• | To the extent not restricted by confidentiality requirements or applicable law, the Adviser will, from time to time, apply experience and information gained in providing services to the Company’s portfolio companies in providing services to competing companies invested in by affiliates’ other clients, which could have adverse consequences for the Company or its portfolio investments. In addition, in providing services in respect of such portfolio companies and other issuers of portfolio investments, the Adviser or its affiliates will, from time to time, come into possession of information that it is prohibited from acting on (including on behalf of the Company) or disclosing as a result of applicable confidentiality requirements or applicable law, even though such action or disclosure would be in the interests of the Company. |
• | As a registered investment company, the Company will be limited in its ability to invest in any investment in which the Adviser or its affiliates’ other clients have an investment. The Company will also be limited in its ability to co-invest with the Adviser or one or more of its affiliates. Some of these co-investments would only be permitted pursuant to an exemptive order from the SEC. On January 5, 2021, the SEC issued an exemptive order granting exemptive relief that expanded the Company’s ability to co-invest with certain of its affiliates in privately negotiated transactions subject to the conditions specified in the exemptive order. |
• | Global Atlantic Financial Group Limited (“Global Atlantic”), a retirement and life insurance company, is wholly-owned by KKR, and operates as a KKR subsidiary and standalone business. KKR, including the Adviser, serves as Global Atlantic’s investment manager. KKR, including the Adviser, generally expects to treat any Global Atlantic account as a client account for the purposes of allocating investment opportunities and related fees and expenses. Certain Global Atlantic accounts may co-invest alongside the Company in some or all investments in the Company’s Private Credit Strategy. Due to the limited nature of many Private Credit investment opportunities, the Adviser expects that participation by Global Atlantic accounts in co-investment transactions will generally reduce the allocations otherwise available to other co-investing accounts, including the Company. The establishment of Global Atlantic accounts investing directly in the Private Credit Strategy investments will create a conflict of interest in that KKR will be incentivized to allocate more attractive investments and scarce investment opportunities to these proprietary entities and accounts rather than to the Company. To mitigate this conflict, KKR will allocate investment opportunities in a manner that is consistent with an allocation methodology established by KKR and its affiliates (including the Adviser), as described above, in a manner designed to ensure allocations of such opportunities are made on a fair and equitable basis over time. |
• | The Company depends to a significant extent on the Adviser’s access to the investment professionals and senior management of KKR and the information and deal flow generated by the KKR investment professionals and senior management during the normal course of their investment and portfolio management activities. The senior management and the investment professionals of the Adviser source, evaluate, analyze and monitor the Company’s investments. The Company’s future success will depend on the continued service of the senior management team and investment professionals of the Adviser. |
• | The Adviser’s relationship with other advisory clients and with KKR could create a conflict of interest to the extent the Adviser becomes aware of inside information concerning investments or potential investment targets. KKR has adopted information-sharing policies and procedures which address both (i) the handling of confidential information and (ii) the information barrier that exists between the public and private sides of KKR. KKR has compliance functions to administer KKR’s information-sharing policies and procedures and monitor potential conflicts of interest. The Company cannot assure its investors, however, that these procedures and practices will be effective. Although the Company plans to leverage KKR’s firm-wide resources to help source, conduct due diligence on, structure, syndicate and create value for the Company’s investments (to the extent permitted by applicable law), KKR’s information-sharing policies and procedures referenced above, as well as certain legal, contractual and tax constraints, could significantly limit KKR’s ability to do so. For example, from time to time KKR’s personnel will be in possession of material non-public information with respect to |
the Company’s investments or potential investments, and as a result, such professionals will be restricted by KKR’s information-sharing policies or by law or contract, from sharing such information with the KKR professionals responsible for making the Company’s investment decisions, even where the disclosure of such information would be in the best interest of the Company or would otherwise influence the decisions taken by such investment professionals with respect to such investment or potential investment. In addition, this conflict and these procedures and practices could limit the freedom of the Adviser to enter into or exit from potentially profitable investments for the Company which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. Conversely, the Adviser could pursue investments for the Company without obtaining access to confidential information otherwise in its or KKR’s possession, which information, if reviewed, might otherwise impact the Adviser’s judgment with respect to such investments. Accordingly, as a result of such restrictions, the investment activities of KKR’s other businesses will differ from, or be inconsistent with, the interests of and activities that are undertaken for the Company and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to fully leverage all of the available resources and industry expertise of KKR’s other businesses. Additionally, there will be circumstances in which one or more individuals associated with the Adviser will be precluded from providing services to the Company because of certain confidential information available to those individuals or to other parts of KKR. |
• | The nature of the Adviser’s businesses and the participation by its employees in creditors’ committees, steering committees or boards of directors of portfolio companies will, from time to time, result in the Adviser receiving material non-public information from time to time with respect to publicly held companies or otherwise becoming an “insider” with respect to such companies. With limited exceptions, KKR does not establish information barriers between its internal investment teams. Trading by KKR on the basis of such information, or improperly disclosing such information, could be restricted pursuant to applicable law and/or internal policies and procedures adopted by KKR to promote compliance with applicable law. Accordingly, the possession of “inside information” or “insider” status with respect to such an issuer by KKR or KKR personnel could, including where an appropriate information barrier does not exist between the relevant investment professionals or has been “crossed” by such professionals, significantly restrict the ability of the Adviser to deal in the securities of that issuer on behalf of the Company, which could adversely impact the Company, including by preventing the execution of an otherwise advisable purchase or sale transaction in a particular security until such information ceases to be regarded as material non-public information, which could have an adverse effect on the overall performance of such investment. In addition, affiliates of KKR in possession of such information could be prevented from disclosing such information to the Adviser, even where the disclosure of such information would be in the interests of the Company. From time to time, the Adviser will also be subject to contractual “stand-still” obligations and/or confidentiality obligations that restrict its ability to trade in certain securities on behalf of the Company. In certain circumstances, the Company or the Adviser will engage an independent agent to dispose of securities of issuers in which KKR could be deemed to have material non-public information on behalf of the Company. Such independent agent could dispose of the relevant securities for a price that is lower than the Adviser’s valuation of such securities which could take into account the material non-public information known to KKR in respect of the relevant issuer. |
• | The Adviser could develop new businesses such as providing investment banking, advisory and other services to corporations, financial sponsors, management or other persons. Such services could relate to transactions that could give rise to investment opportunities that are suitable for the Company. In such case, the Adviser’s client would typically require the Adviser to act exclusively on its behalf, thereby precluding the Company from participating in such investment opportunities. The Adviser would not be obligated to decline any such engagements in order to make an investment opportunity available to the Company. In addition, the Adviser could come into the possession of information through these new businesses that limits the Company’s ability to engage in potential transactions. |
• | The 1940 Act limits the Company’s ability to invest in, or hold securities of, companies that are controlled by funds managed by KKR. Any such investments could create conflicts of interest between the Company, the Adviser and KKR. The Adviser will also have, or enter into, advisory relationships with other advisory clients (including, among others, employee benefit plans subject to ERISA and related regulations) that could lead to circumstances in which a conflict of interest between the Adviser’s advisory clients could exist or develop. In addition, to the extent that another client of the Adviser or KKR holds a different class of securities than the Company, the interest of such client and the Company might not be aligned. As a result of these conflicts and restrictions, the Adviser could be unable to implement the Company’s investment strategies as effectively as it could have in the absence of such conflicts or restrictions. In order to avoid these conflicts and restrictions, the Adviser could choose to exit these investments prematurely and, as a result, the Company would forgo any future positive returns associated with such investments. |
• | Certain other KKR client accounts or proprietary accounts have investment objectives, programs, strategies and positions that are similar to, or conflict with, those of the Company, or compete with, or have interests adverse to, the Company. This type of conflict could affect the prices and availability of the securities or interests in which the Company invests. KKR will, from time to time, give advice or take action with respect to the investments held by, and transactions of, other KKR client accounts or proprietary accounts that could be different from or otherwise inconsistent with the advice given or timing or nature of any action taken with respect to the investments held by, and timing or nature of any action taken with respect to the investments held by, and transactions of, the Company. Such different advice and/or inconsistent actions could be due to a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, the differences between the investment objective, program, strategy and tax treatment of the other KKR client accounts or proprietary accounts and the Company or the regulatory status of other KKR client accounts and any related restrictions or obligations imposed on KKR as a fiduciary thereof. Such advice and actions could adversely impact the Company. |
• | KKR, for its own account or for the account of other KKR clients, could enter into real estate-related transactions with Company portfolio companies. Such transactions could include, for example, buying or selling real estate assets, acquiring or entering into leasing arrangements or amending such arrangements or transferring options or rights of first refusal to acquire real estate assets. Such transactions, which do not involve securities, are not governed by restrictions on principal transactions and cross transactions but are subject to specific policies and procedures established by KKR to manage related conflicts. |
• | The 1940 Act prohibits the Company from participating in certain transactions with certain of its affiliates including an Adviser-affiliated broker-dealer. The Company generally is prohibited, for example, from buying or selling any securities from or to another client of the Adviser or of KKR. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain “joint” transactions with certain of the Company’s affiliates, which in certain circumstances could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times to the extent the transaction involves jointness) or transactions in which a broker-dealer affiliated with the Adviser participates as principal with the Company. If a person acquires more than 25% of the Company’s voting securities, the Company will generally be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such person or certain of that person’s affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions with such persons. Similar restrictions limit the Company’s ability to transact business with its officers or directors or their affiliates. The SEC has interpreted the 1940 Act rules governing transactions with affiliates to prohibit certain “joint transactions” involving entities that share a common investment adviser. As a result of these restrictions, the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to the Company will be limited. These investment opportunities will generally be made available to other funds, vehicles and accounts advised by the Adviser that are not subject to similar restrictions under the 1940 Act. |
• | The Company’s Shareholders are based in a wide variety of jurisdictions and take a wide variety of forms. Accordingly, they could have conflicting regulatory, legal, investment, tax and other interests with respect to their investments in the Company. The conflicting interests of individual Shareholders relate to or arise from, among other things, the nature of investments made by the Company, the selection, structuring, acquisition and management of investments, the timing of disposition of investments, internal investment policies of the Shareholders and their target risk/return profiles. As a consequence, conflicts of interest could arise in connection with decisions made by the Adviser, including with respect to the nature or structuring of investments, which could be more beneficial for one Shareholder than for another Shareholder, especially with respect to Shareholders’ individual tax situations. In addition, the Company could make investments that have a negative impact on related investments made by the Company in separate transactions. In selecting and structuring investments appropriate for the Company, the Adviser will consider the investment and tax objectives of the Company and its Shareholders as a whole, not the investment, tax or other objectives of any Shareholder individually. |
1. | Borrowing Money . The Company will not borrow money, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time. |
2. | Senior Securities . The Company will not issue senior securities, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time. |
3. | Underwriting . The Company will not act as an underwriter of securities within the meaning of the 1933 Act, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time. |
4. | Concentration . The Company will not “concentrate” its investments in an industry, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time. |
5. | Real Estate . The Company will not purchase or sell real estate, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time. |
6. | Commodities . The Company will not purchase or sell commodities, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time. |
7. | Loans . The Company will not make loans to other persons, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time. |
Name, Year of Birth and Address 1 |
Position(s) Held with the Company |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Registered Investment Companies in Fund Complex Overseen by Director 2 |
Other Directorships Held by Director 3 |
|||||||||||
Interested Director |
||||||||||||||||
Ryan L.G. Wilson (1977) |
|
Director and Chair |
|
|
Indefinite term; Since 2023 |
|
Managing Director, KKR (since 2006). | 2 | |
KKR Enhanced US Direct Lending Fund-L Inc. |
| |||||
Independent Directors |
||||||||||||||||
Catherine B. Sidamon-Eristoff (1964) |
Director | |
Indefinite term; Since 2023 |
|
Treasurer and Board Member, C-Change Conversations (non-profit organization) (since 2017); Board Member, FlexPaths LLC (workplace strategy and consulting firm) (since 2008). |
4 | |
KKR Enhanced US Direct Lending Fund-L Inc. |
| |||||||
James H. Kropp (1949) |
Director | |
Indefinite term; Since 2023 |
|
Trustee, AMH (formerly American Homes 4 Rent) (since 2012); Director, FS KKR Capital Corp. (since 2018); Director, KKR Real Estate Select Trust Inc. (since 2020); Director, PS Business Parks (1998 – 2021). | 3 | |
AMH (formerly American Homes 4 Rent); PS Business Parks, Inc.; FS KKR Capital Corp.; KKR FS Income Trust; KKR FS Income Trust Select; KKR Enhanced US Direct Lending Fund-L Inc. |
| |||||||
Elizabeth J. Sandler (1970) |
Director | |
Indefinite term; Since 2023 |
|
CEO, Echo Juliette LLC (since 2019); NED, essensys PLC (since 2020); Board Member, Scholars of Finance (since 2020). | 2 | |
FS KKR Capital Corp.; KKR FS Income Trust; KKR FS Income Trust Select; KKR Enhanced US Direct Lending Fund-L Inc. |
|
1 | Each Director may be contacted by writing to the Director, c/o KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC, 555 California Street, 50th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104, Attn: General Counsel. |
2 | The Fund Complex is comprised of the Company, KKR Real Estate Select Trust Inc., KKR Credit Opportunities Portfolio, KKR Income Opportunities Fund, and KKR Asset-Based Income Fund. |
3 | This column includes only directorships of companies required to report to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (i.e., “public companies”) or other investment companies registered under the 1940 Act. |
Name |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Company |
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Director in Family of Investment Companies 2 |
||||
Interested Director |
||||||
Ryan L.G. Wilson |
None | Over $100,000 | ||||
Independent Directors |
||||||
Catherine B. Sidamon-Eristoff |
None | Over $100,000 | ||||
James H. Kropp |
None | Over $100,000 | ||||
Elizabeth J. Sandler |
None | None |
1 | “Beneficial Ownership” is determined in accordance with Section 16a-1(a)(2) under the Exchange Act. |
2 | The term “Family of Investment Companies” refers to all registered investment companies advised by the Adviser or an affiliate board. |
Name of Director |
Aggregate Compensation From the Company |
Total Compensation From Fund Complex Paid to Directors |
||||||
Interested Director 1 |
||||||||
Ryan L.G. Wilson |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
Independent Directors |
||||||||
Catherine B. Sidamon-Eristoff |
$ | 28,125 | $ | 127,500 | ||||
James H. Kropp |
$ | 28,125 | $ | 206,250 | ||||
Elizabeth J. Sandler |
$ | 28,125 | $ | 56,250 |
1 | The Interested Director is not compensated by the Company or the Fund Complex for his services. |
Number of Accounts |
Assets of Accounts (in millions) |
Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee |
Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millons) |
|||||||||||||
Registered Investment Companies |
2 | $ | 1,426 | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Pooled Investment Vehicles Other Than Registered Investment Companies |
18 | $ | 82,149 | 16 | $ | 19,852 | ||||||||||
Other Accounts |
22 | $ | 4,718 | 16 | $ | 4,018 |
Portfolio Manager |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Owned* | |
Daniel Pietrzak |
None |
* | Ranges (None, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000, $100,001-$500,000, $500,001-$1,000,000 or over $1,000,000). |
Name, Year of Birth and Address 1 |
Position(s) Held with the Company |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
George Mueller (1983) | President and Chief Executive Officer | Since Inception | Partner, KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (since 2009). | |||
Thomas Murphy (1966) | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer | Since Inception | Managing Director, (Finance & Accounting), KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (since 2012); Chief Financial Officer, KKR Financial Holdings LLC (since 2009). | |||
Michael Nguyen (1982) | Chief Compliance Officer | Since Inception | Director, KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (since 2013); Secretary and Vice President, KKR Credit Opportunities Portfolio (2019-2022). | |||
Lori Hoffman (1988) | General Counsel and Secretary | Since Inception | Director, KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (since 2020); Associate, Dechert LLP (2013-2020). |
1 | Each Officer may be contacted by writing to the officer, c/o KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC, 555 California Street, 50th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104, Attn: General Counsel. |
PART C: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 25. Financial Statements and Exhibits
* | Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form N-2, Investment Company Act File No. 811-23908, filed October 13, 2023. |
** | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form N-2, Investment Company Act File No. 811-23908, filed December 21, 2023. |
1
Item 26. Marketing Arrangements
Reference is made to the Distribution Agreement incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form N-2, Investment Company Act File No. 811-23908, filed October 13, 2023.
Item 27. Other Expenses of Issuance or Distribution
Not applicable.
Item 28. Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with the Registrant
None.
Item 29. Number of Holder of Securities
As of April 1, 2025:
Title of Class | Number of Record Holders |
|||
Common Shares |
1 |
Item 30. Indemnification
Reference is made to Article VII of Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation and Article VII of Registrant’s Bylaws incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form N-2, Investment Company Act File No. 811-23908, filed December 21, 2023.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), may be permitted to the directors, officers and controlling persons of Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, Registrant has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by the directors, officer or controlling person of Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by the directors, officer or controlling person, Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
Item 31. Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser
The descriptions of KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC under the caption “Management of the Fund” in the private placement memorandum of this registration statement are incorporated by reference herein. Information as to the directors and officers of KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC together with information as to any other business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature engaged in by the directors and officers of KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC in the last two years is incorporated by reference to the information contained in the Form ADV of the KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC filed with the SEC pursuant to the 1940 Act (SEC No. 801-69633, IARD/CRD# 146629). The Adviser’s principal business address is 555 California Street, 50th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Item 32. Location of Accounts and Records
The books, accounts and other documents required by Section 31(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder will be maintained at the offices of:
(1) | KKR US Direct Lending Fund-U Inc., 555 California Street, 50th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104; and |
2
(2) | KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC, 555 California Street, 50th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104. |
Item 33. Management Services
Not applicable.
Item 34. Undertakings
Not applicable.
3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Registrant certifies that it has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of New York, and the State of New York, on the 30th day of April, 2025.
KKR US DIRECT LENDING FUND-U INC.
(A Delaware corporation) | ||
By: | /s/ George Mueller | |
George Mueller | ||
President |
4