Collaborative Research and License Agreements	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Research and Development [Abstract]
Collaborative Research and License Agreements	Collaborative Research and License Agreements Ipsen Collaboration Agreement Summary of Agreement On July 30, 2021 (the “Ipsen Effective Date”), the Company entered into a Collaboration, Option and License Agreement with Ipsen (the “Ipsen Collaboration Agreement”). Pursuant to the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company granted to Ipsen exclusive access and options to license SNA-based therapeutics arising from two collaboration programs related to the treatment of Huntington’s disease and Angelman syndrome (each, an “Ipsen Collaboration Program”), respectively. Each such license (obtained in connection with the exercise of an Ipsen Option, as defined and discussed further below) would grant to Ipsen exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable, worldwide rights to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize such SNA therapeutics. Upon written notice to the Company, Ipsen may exercise its option during the corresponding collaboration program’s applicable option exercise period, (each, an “Ipsen Option Exercise Period”). On December 12, 2022 (the “Ipsen Termination Agreement Effective Date”), the Company and Ipsen entered into a Mutual Termination Agreement (the “Ipsen Termination Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties mutually agreed to terminate the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement. Following such termination, the parties will jointly own R&D Term IP (as defined in the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement) and Patents Covering the R&D Term IP (as defined in the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement), with each party owning an equal, undivided interest in and to such R&D Term IP and patents. As a result of the termination of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company regained the ability to independently develop medicines targeting Angelman syndrome and Huntington’s disease while Ipsen retains the right to re-enter into the collaboration with the Company in Huntington’s disease and Angelman’s syndrome. As of the Ipsen Effective Date and through the Ipsen Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company and Ipsen had agreed upon a development plan for each Ipsen Collaboration Program that describes the development activities and timelines required to advance each such Ipsen Collaboration Program through its first IND filing (each, an “Ipsen Development Plan”). The activities described in the Ipsen Development Plans were conducted under the supervision of the Ipsen Joint Steering Committee (the “Ipsen JSC”) consisting of three members from each of the Company and Ipsen. Under the terms of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company was to use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct discovery and development in two collaboration programs for Huntington’s disease (the “HD Program”) and Angelman syndrome (the “AS Program”) (the “Ipsen Development Activities”) respectively. The Company was solely responsible for all costs and expenses of conducting each Ipsen Collaboration Program through the selection of SNA therapeutic candidates for further development (“Ipsen Selection”), and Ipsen was responsible for all costs and expenses of all activities that were necessary to enable the first filing of an IND for each proposed product candidate. In the event that Ipsen exercised an option, Ipsen would have been responsible for further development from the license effective date and commercialization of the corresponding licensed product. In the event of completion of all Ipsen Development Activities for the Ipsen Selection (the “Ipsen First R&D Term Activities”), the Company was required to deliver to Ipsen a report that described the results of the Ipsen First R&D Term Activities and identified at least one SNA-based compound that satisfies certain criteria for such Ipsen Collaboration Program as determined by the Ipsen JSC (the “Ipsen First Option Data Package”). Following the delivery of the Ipsen First Option Data Package for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, Ipsen would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “Ipsen First Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an option (each a “First Ipsen Option”) to obtain worldwide rights and license to the Company’s SNA technology and the Company’s interest in joint collaboration technology to make, have made, import, use, sell or offer for sale any product (each an “Ipsen Licensed Product”) that resulted from such Ipsen Collaboration Program during the term of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement. In the event Ipsen (i) did not exercise the First Ipsen Option with respect to an Ipsen Collaboration Program, (ii) the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement had not expired or been terminated with respect to such Ipsen Collaboration Program, and (iii) Ipsen agreed to fully fund additional research activities for an Ipsen Collaboration Program through IND filing, the Company would have been responsible for research and development activities for such Ipsen Collaboration Program through IND filing (the “Ipsen Second R&D Term Activities”). In the event of completion of the Ipsen Second R&D Term Activities, the Company would have been required to deliver to Ipsen a report that described the results of the Ipsen Second R&D Term Activities (the “Ipsen Second Option Data Package”). Following the delivery of the Ipsen Second Option Data Package for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, Ipsen would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “Ipsen Second Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an option (each a “Second Ipsen Option” and together with the First Ipsen Option, the “Ipsen Options”) to obtain worldwide rights and license to the Company’s SNA technology and the Company’s interest in joint collaboration technology to make, have made, import, use, sell or offer for sale any Ipsen Licensed Product” that results from such Ipsen Collaboration Program during the term of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement. In the event of Ipsen’s exercise of an Ipsen Option for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, the Company would have been required to supply to Ipsen the licensed SNAs under current Good Manufacturing Practice, at the Company’s manufacturing cost pursuant to a clinical supply agreement to be negotiated by the Company and Ipsen in good faith following the Ipsen Effective Date and executed within twelve (12) months after the Ipsen Effective Date (the “Ipsen Supply Agreement”). The Ipsen Supply Agreement would have provided for the transfer by the Company to Ipsen of all documents and information, and the provision by the Company of technical assistance and support, for Ipsen to manufacture or have manufactured by a third party contractor engaged by Ipsen the applicable licensed SNA to the extent it is intended to be actually used in the development and manufacture of the applicable licensed products. Under the terms of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company received a nonrefundable upfront payment of $20,000 (the “Ipsen Upfront Payment”). If Ipsen exercised a First Ipsen Option, Ipsen was required to pay the Company the First Ipsen Option exercise fee of $10,000 for each Ipsen Collaboration Program. If Ipsen exercised a Second Ipsen Option, Ipsen was required to pay the Company the Second Ipsen Option exercise fee of $25,000 for each Ipsen Collaboration Program. Ipsen would have been required to pay a preclinical milestone payment of $5,000 for each Ipsen Collaboration Program upon achievement of such milestone regardless of whether an Ipsen Option was exercised. In addition to the option exercise fees and the preclinical milestones described above, if Ipsen exercised an Ipsen Option for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, development and regulatory milestones would have been payable for that program upon the initiation of certain clinical trials and the filing for processing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) in the United States and by two additional regulators outside the United States of a marketing application for review, per the Ipsen Collaboration Program, with an aggregate total of up to $180,000 if both Ipsen Options were exercised. Commercial milestones would have been payable for that Ipsen Collaboration Program upon first commercial sale of a licensed product in certain jurisdictions and the achievement of specified aggregate sales thresholds for all licensed products from that program, with an aggregate total of up to $762,000 if both Ipsen Options were exercised. In the event a therapeutic candidate subject to the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement resulted in commercial sales, the Company was eligible to receive tiered royalties at percentages ranging from the mid-single digits to the mid-teens on future net product sales of such commercialized therapeutic candidates. A percentage of the aforementioned payments would have been due to Northwestern University upon receipt, pursuant to the terms of the Company’s existing license agreements with Northwestern University (see Note 15, Commitment and Contingencies, for more information on the Northwestern University License Agreements (as defined below)). In connection with the receipt of the Ipsen Upfront Payment, the Company paid a $3,000 license fee to Northwestern University under the terms of the Northwestern License Agreements. The Company’s obligations to conduct activities defined in the Ipsen Development Plan under the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement commenced on July 30, 2021 and continued through the Ipsen Termination Agreement effective date. Accounting Analysis The Company concluded that Ipsen was a customer in this arrangement, and as such the arrangement falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. Under the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company has identified two performance obligations, as follows: (1) the performance obligation related to the HD Program that includes (i) the Ipsen First R&D Term Activities related to the HD Program (the “Ipsen HD Program R&D Services”), (ii) Ipsen JSC services related to the HD Program during the Ipsen First Term (the “Ipsen HD Program JSC Services”), and (iii) activities related to the negotiation of the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date; and (2) the performance obligation related to the AS Program that includes (i) the Ipsen First R&D Term Activities related to the AS Program (the “Ipsen AS Program R&D Services”), (ii) Ipsen JSC services related to the AS Program during the Ipsen First Term (the “Ipsen AS Program JSC Services”), (iii) and activities related to the negotiation of the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date. The Company has concluded that the Ipsen HD Program R&D Services and the Ipsen AS Program R&D Services are not distinct from the Ipsen HD Program JSC Services and the Ipsen AS Program JSC Services, respectively. The Company has also concluded that the Ipsen HD Program JSC Services and the Ipsen AS Program JSC Services are not distinct from the activities related to entering the Ipsen Supply Agreements for each respective program. The Ipsen JSC provided oversight and management of the overall Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, and the members of the Ipsen JSC from the Company have specialized industry knowledge, particularly as it relates to SNA technology. The Ipsen JSC was meant to facilitate the early stage research being performed and coordinate the activities of both the Company and Ipsen. Further, the Ipsen JSC services were critical to the ongoing evaluation of the Ipsen Collaboration Programs and the drafting and evaluation of the Ipsen First Option Data Package. The Ipsen JSC would also have provided oversight and management of the activities to enter into the Ipsen Supply Agreement. Accordingly, the Company’s participation on the Ipsen JSC was essential to Ipsen receiving value from the Ipsen HD Program R&D Services and the Ipsen AS Program R&D Services, and as such, (i) the Ipsen HD Program JSC Services, along with the Ipsen HD Program R&D Services and the activities related to entering the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date for that program are considered a single performance obligation (the “Ipsen HD Program Services”) and (ii) the Ipsen AS Program JSC Services along with the Ipsen AS Program R&D Services and the activities related to entering the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date for that program are considered a single performance obligation (the “Ipsen AS Program Services”). As of the Ipsen Effective Date, the total transaction price was determined to be $20,000, consisting solely of the Ipsen Upfront Payment. The Company also utilized the most likely amount method to estimate any development and regulatory milestone payments to be received. As of the Ipsen Effective Date, there were no milestones included in the transaction price. The preclinical, development, regulatory, and commercial milestones were fully constrained due to the significant uncertainties surrounding such payments. The Company considered the stage of development and the risks associated with the remaining development required to achieve the milestone, as well as whether the achievement of the milestone is outside the control of the Company or Ipsen. The Company has determined that any commercial milestones and sales-based royalties will be recognized when the related sales occur and therefore, they have also been excluded from the transaction price. The Company re-evaluated the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events were resolved or other changes in circumstances occurred. As of the Ipsen Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company determined that the total transaction price was $20,000. The Company allocated the total transaction price to each of the two identified performance obligations under the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement based on an expected cost plus a margin approach, as follows: $10,793 of the transaction price allocated to the Ipsen HD Program Services and $9,207 of the transaction price allocated to the Ipsen AS Program Services. The Company recognized revenue related to each of Ipsen HD Program Services and the Ipsen AS Program Services as those performance obligations were satisfied using an input method to measure progress for each of those performance obligations. The Company believes the input method that most accurately depicts the measure of progress is the actual hours incurred to date relative to projected hours to complete the activities for the Ipsen HD Program Services and the Ipsen AS Program Services. In connection with the Ipsen Termination Agreement, the Company recognized as revenue any remaining deferred revenue associated with the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement in the fourth quarter of 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized revenue under the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement of $17,691. AbbVie Collaboration Agreement Summary of Agreement On November 13, 2019 (the “AbbVie Effective Date”), the Company entered into a Collaboration, Option and License Agreement (the “AbbVie Collaboration Agreement”), with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allergan plc, Allergan. On May 8, 2020, Allergan plc, including Allergan was acquired by AbbVie. Pursuant to the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company granted to AbbVie exclusive access and options to license SNA-based therapeutics arising from two collaboration programs related to the treatment of hair loss disorders (each, an “AbbVie Collaboration Program”). Under each such license (obtained in connection with the exercise of an AbbVie Option, as defined and discussed further below), the Company would grant to AbbVie exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable, nontransferable, worldwide rights to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize such SNA therapeutics. Under the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company was to use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct the AbbVie Collaboration Programs, each focused on one or more hair loss disorders to discover one or more SNA products that are directed to, bind to or inhibit one or more specific AbbVie Collaboration Program targets. On December 13, 2022 (the “AbbVie Termination Agreement Effective Date”), the Company and Allergan entered into a letter agreement (the “AbbVie Termination Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties mutually agreed to terminate the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement. Following such termination, the Company transferred to Allergan all data, information, and reports made or generated by the Company in the course of performing activities under the Development Plan (as defined in the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement), and granted to Allergan all rights to transfer, publish, present, or otherwise publicly disclose any Collaboration Technology (as defined in the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement) and data made or generated by the Company in the course of performing activities under the Development Plan. As a result of the termination of the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company regained the ability to independently develop medicines targeting hair loss disorders. As of the AbbVie Effective Date and through the AbbVie Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company and AbbVie had agreed upon a development plan for each AbbVie Collaboration Program that described the development activities and timelines required to advance such AbbVie Collaboration Program through its first IND filing (each, an “AbbVie Development Plan”). The activities described in the AbbVie Development Plan were conducted under the supervision of the AbbVie Joint Development Committee (the “AbbVie JDC”) consisting of three members from each of the Company and AbbVie. The Company was primarily responsible for performing early-stage discovery and preclinical activities (the “AbbVie Collaboration Program Initial Development Activities”) set forth in the AbbVie Development Plan for each AbbVie Collaboration Program and would have been solely responsible for all costs and expenses related to the AbbVie Collaboration Program Initial Development Activities. AbbVie had the right to elect, in its sole discretion and at its sole cost and expense, to conduct formulation assessment and in vivo testing as set forth in an AbbVie Development Plan. In the event of completion of all AbbVie Initial Development Activities, the Company would have been required to deliver to AbbVie a report that described the results of the AbbVie Initial Development Activities and identified at least one SNA-based compound that satisfies certain criteria for such AbbVie Collaboration Program as determined by the AbbVie JDC (the “AbbVie Initial Development Report”). Following the delivery of the AbbVie Initial Development Report for an AbbVie Collaboration Program, AbbVie would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an option (each an “AbbVie Option”) to obtain worldwide rights and license to the Company’s SNA technology and the Company’s interest in joint collaboration technology to make, have made, import, use, sell or offer for sale any product (each an “AbbVie Licensed Product”) that resulted from such AbbVie Collaboration Program during the term of the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement. At AbbVie’s sole option, AbbVie had the right to extend the AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period (the “AbbVie Option Extension”) and require the Company to perform IND-enabling activities described in the AbbVie Development Plan (the “AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities”), subject to the payment of additional consideration (“AbbVie Extension Exercise”). If AbbVie exercised the AbbVie Option Extension, the Company would have been responsible for conducting the AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities and would have been solely responsible for all costs and expenses associated with such activities. In the event of completion of the AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities, the Company would have been required to deliver a report that describes the results of the AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities (the “AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities Data Package”) to AbbVie. Following the delivery of AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities Data Package, AbbVie would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “AbbVie Extended Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an AbbVie Option with respect to such AbbVie Collaboration Program. After the exercise of an AbbVie Option with respect to an AbbVie Collaboration Program, AbbVie would have been responsible for all development, manufacturing and commercialization activities, and costs and expense associated with such activities in connection with AbbVie Licensed Products arising from such AbbVie Collaboration Program. The Company’s obligation to conduct the activities defined in the AbbVie Development Plan under the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement commenced on November 13, 2019 and continued through the AbbVie Termination Agreement Effective Date. Under the terms of the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company received a $25,000 upfront, non-refundable, non-creditable cash payment (the “AbbVie Upfront Payment”) related to the Company’s research and development costs for conducting the AbbVie Development Plan for two AbbVie Collaboration Programs, each focused on one or more targets, and certain options to obtain exclusive, worldwide licenses under certain intellectual property rights owned or controlled by the Company to develop, manufacture and commercialize certain products resulting from each such AbbVie Collaboration Programs. The option exercise fee during the AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period was $10,000 per AbbVie Collaboration Program. If AbbVie elected to extend the AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period, AbbVie would have been required to pay an additional fee of $10,000. If AbbVie elected to exercise its option during the AbbVie Extended Option Exercise Period, AbbVie would have been required to pay the Company the option exercise fee of $15,000. Following the exercise by AbbVie of an AbbVie Option with respect to an AbbVie Collaboration Program, AbbVie would have been required to make certain milestone payments to the Company upon the achievement of specified development, product approval and launch, and commercial events, on an AbbVie Licensed Product by AbbVie Licensed Product basis. On an AbbVie Licensed Product by AbbVie Licensed Product basis, for the first AbbVie Licensed Product to achieve the associated milestone event, the Company was eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $55,000 for development milestone payments and $132,500 for product approval and launch milestone payments. The Company was also eligible for up to $175,000 in sales milestone payments on an AbbVie Collaboration Program by AbbVie Collaboration Program basis, associated with aggregate worldwide sales. Certain product approval milestones were subject to certain reductions under specified circumstances, including for payments required to be made by AbbVie to obtain certain third-party intellectual property rights. In addition, to the extent there was any AbbVie Licensed Product, the Company would have been entitled to receive tiered royalty payments of mid-single digits to the mid-teens percentage on future net worldwide product sales of such AbbVie Licensed Products, subject to certain reductions under specified circumstances. Royalties were due on a AbbVie Licensed Product by AbbVie Licensed Product and country by country basis from the date of the first commercial sale of each AbbVie Licensed Product in a country until the latest to occur of: (i) the expiration date in such country of the last to expire valid claim within the licensed intellectual property covering the manufacture, use or sale of such AbbVie Licensed Product in such country, (ii) the tenth anniversary of the first commercial sale of such AbbVie Licensed Product in such country, and (iii) the expiration of regulatory exclusivity for such AbbVie Licensed Product in such country. Accounting Analysis The Company concluded that AbbVie was a customer in this arrangement, and as such the arrangement falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. Under the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company has identified a single performance obligation that includes (i) the research and development activities during the AbbVie Research Term (the “AbbVie R&D Services”), and (ii) AbbVie Joint Development Committee services during the AbbVie Research Term (the “AbbVie JDC Services”). The Company has concluded that the AbbVie R&D Services is not distinct from the AbbVie JDC Services during the AbbVie Research Term. The AbbVie JDC provided oversight and management of the overall AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, and the members of the AbbVie JDC from the Company have specialized industry knowledge, particularly as it relates to SNA technology. The AbbVie JDC was meant to facilitate the early-stage research being performed and coordinate the activities of both the Company and AbbVie. Further, the AbbVie JDC services were critical to the ongoing evaluation of an AbbVie Collaboration Program and the drafting and evaluation of the AbbVie Initial Development Report and the AbbVie IND-Enabling Data Package. Accordingly, the Company’s participation on the AbbVie JDC was essential to AbbVie receiving value from the AbbVie R&D Services and as such, the AbbVie JDC Services along with the AbbVie R&D Services are considered one performance obligation (the “AbbVie Collaboration Program Services”). In addition, the Company has concluded that the option to purchase two development and commercialization licenses was considered a marketing offer as the options did not provide any discounts or other rights that would be considered a material right in the arrangement, and thus, not a performance obligation at the onset of the agreement. The consideration for these options would have been accounted for when they are exercised. As of the AbbVie Effective Date, the total transaction price was determined to be $25,000, consisting solely of the AbbVie Upfront Payment. The Company also utilized the most likely amount method to estimate any development and regulatory milestone payments to be received. As of the AbbVie Effective Date, there were no milestones included in the transaction price. The milestones were fully constrained due to the significant uncertainties surrounding such payments. The Company considered the stage of development and the risks associated with the remaining development required to achieve the milestone, as well as whether the achievement of the milestone is outside the control of the Company or AbbVie. The Company has determined that any commercial milestones and sales-based royalties will be recognized when the related sales occur and therefore they have also been excluded from the transaction price. The Company re-evaluated the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events were resolved or other changes in circumstances occurred. As of the AbbVie Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company determined the total transaction price was $25,000. The Company recognized revenue related to the AbbVie Collaboration Program Services as the performance obligation is satisfied using an input method to measure progress. The Company believes the input method that most accurately depicts the measure of progress is the actual hours incurred to date relative to projected hours to complete the research service. During the third quarter of 2021, the AbbVie JDC revised the AbbVie Initial Development Plan for each AbbVie Collaboration Program. As a result, the Company had increased its estimate of total hours to complete the research services, requiring an adjustment to cumulative revenue recognized (considered a change in estimate pursuant to ASC 606), which led to a full year revenue reversal of $(2,792) in the prior year. In connection with the AbbVie Termination Agreement, the Company recognized as revenue any remaining deferred revenue associated with the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement in the fourth quarter of 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized revenue under the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement of $11,135.

On July 30, 2021 (the “Ipsen Effective Date”), the Company entered into a Collaboration, Option and License Agreement with Ipsen (the “Ipsen Collaboration Agreement”). Pursuant to the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company granted to Ipsen exclusive access and options to license SNA-based therapeutics arising from two collaboration programs related to the treatment of Huntington’s disease and Angelman syndrome (each, an “Ipsen Collaboration Program”), respectively. Each such license (obtained in connection with the exercise of an Ipsen Option, as defined and discussed further below) would grant to Ipsen exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable, worldwide rights to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize such SNA therapeutics. Upon written notice to the Company, Ipsen may exercise its option during the corresponding collaboration program’s applicable option exercise period, (each, an “Ipsen Option Exercise Period”).

On December 12, 2022 (the “Ipsen Termination Agreement Effective Date”), the Company and Ipsen entered into a Mutual Termination Agreement (the “Ipsen Termination Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties mutually agreed to terminate the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement. Following such termination, the parties will jointly own R&D Term IP (as defined in the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement) and Patents Covering the R&D Term IP (as defined in the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement), with each party owning an equal, undivided interest in and to such R&D Term IP and patents. As a result of the termination of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company regained the ability to independently develop medicines targeting Angelman syndrome and Huntington’s disease while Ipsen retains the right to re-enter into the collaboration with the Company in Huntington’s disease and Angelman’s syndrome.

As of the Ipsen Effective Date and through the Ipsen Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company and Ipsen had agreed upon a development plan for each Ipsen Collaboration Program that describes the development activities and timelines required to advance each such Ipsen Collaboration Program through its first IND filing (each, an “Ipsen Development Plan”). The activities described in the Ipsen Development Plans were conducted under the supervision of the Ipsen Joint Steering Committee (the “Ipsen JSC”) consisting of three members from each of the Company and Ipsen. Under the terms of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company was to use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct discovery and development in two collaboration programs for Huntington’s disease (the “HD Program”) and Angelman syndrome (the “AS Program”) (the “Ipsen Development Activities”) respectively. The Company was solely responsible for all costs and expenses of conducting each Ipsen Collaboration Program through the selection of SNA therapeutic candidates for further development (“Ipsen Selection”), and Ipsen was responsible for all costs and expenses of all activities that were necessary to enable the first filing of an IND for each proposed product candidate. In the event that Ipsen exercised an option, Ipsen would have been responsible for further development from the license effective date and commercialization of the corresponding licensed product.

In the event of completion of all Ipsen Development Activities for the Ipsen Selection (the “Ipsen First R&D Term Activities”), the Company was required to deliver to Ipsen a report that described the results of the Ipsen First R&D Term Activities and identified at least one SNA-based compound that satisfies certain criteria for such Ipsen Collaboration Program as determined by the Ipsen JSC (the “Ipsen First Option Data Package”). Following the delivery of the Ipsen First Option Data Package for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, Ipsen would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “Ipsen First Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an option (each a “First Ipsen Option”) to obtain worldwide rights and license to the Company’s SNA technology and the Company’s interest in joint collaboration technology to make, have made, import, use, sell or offer for sale any product (each an “Ipsen Licensed Product”) that resulted from such Ipsen Collaboration Program during the term of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement.

Program, and (iii) Ipsen agreed to fully fund additional research activities for an Ipsen Collaboration Program through IND filing, the Company would have been responsible for research and development activities for such Ipsen Collaboration Program through IND filing (the “Ipsen Second R&D Term Activities”). In the event of completion of the Ipsen Second R&D Term Activities, the Company would have been required to deliver to Ipsen a report that described the results of the Ipsen Second R&D Term Activities (the “Ipsen Second Option Data Package”). Following the delivery of the Ipsen Second Option Data Package for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, Ipsen would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “Ipsen Second Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an option (each a “Second Ipsen Option” and together with the First Ipsen Option, the “Ipsen Options”) to obtain worldwide rights and license to the Company’s SNA technology and the Company’s interest in joint collaboration technology to make, have made, import, use, sell or offer for sale any Ipsen Licensed Product” that results from such Ipsen Collaboration Program during the term of the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement.

In the event of Ipsen’s exercise of an Ipsen Option for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, the Company would have been required to supply to Ipsen the licensed SNAs under current Good Manufacturing Practice, at the Company’s manufacturing cost pursuant to a clinical supply agreement to be negotiated by the Company and Ipsen in good faith following the Ipsen Effective Date and executed within twelve (12) months after the Ipsen Effective Date (the “Ipsen Supply Agreement”). The Ipsen Supply Agreement would have provided for the transfer by the Company to Ipsen of all documents and information, and the provision by the Company of technical assistance and support, for Ipsen to manufacture or have manufactured by a third party contractor engaged by Ipsen the applicable licensed SNA to the extent it is intended to be actually used in the development and manufacture of the applicable licensed products.

Ipsen would have been required to pay a preclinical milestone payment of $5,000 for each Ipsen Collaboration Program upon achievement of such milestone regardless of whether an Ipsen Option was exercised. In addition to the option exercise fees and the preclinical milestones described above, if Ipsen exercised an Ipsen Option for an Ipsen Collaboration Program, development and regulatory milestones would have been payable for that program upon the initiation of certain clinical trials and the filing for processing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) in the United States and by two additional regulators outside the United States of a marketing application for review, per the Ipsen Collaboration Program, with an aggregate total of up to $180,000 if both Ipsen Options were exercised. Commercial milestones would have been payable for that Ipsen Collaboration Program upon first commercial sale of a licensed product in certain jurisdictions and the achievement of specified aggregate sales thresholds for all licensed products from that program, with an aggregate total of up to $762,000 if both Ipsen Options were exercised. In the event a therapeutic candidate subject to the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement resulted in commercial sales, the Company was eligible to receive tiered royalties at percentages ranging from the mid-single digits to the mid-teens on future net product sales of such commercialized therapeutic candidates. A percentage of the aforementioned payments would have been due to Northwestern University upon receipt, pursuant to the terms of the Company’s existing license agreements with Northwestern University (see Note 15, Commitment and Contingencies, for more information on the Northwestern University License Agreements (as defined below)). In connection with the receipt of the Ipsen Upfront Payment, the Company paid a $3,000 license fee to Northwestern University under the terms of the Northwestern License Agreements.

The Company concluded that Ipsen was a customer in this arrangement, and as such the arrangement falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. Under the Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, the Company has identified two performance obligations, as follows: (1) the performance obligation related to the HD Program that includes (i) the Ipsen First R&D Term Activities related to the HD Program (the “Ipsen HD Program R&D Services”), (ii) Ipsen JSC services related to the HD Program during the Ipsen First Term (the “Ipsen HD Program JSC Services”), and (iii) activities related to the negotiation of the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date; and (2) the performance obligation related to the AS Program that includes (i) the Ipsen First R&D Term Activities related to the AS Program (the “Ipsen AS Program R&D Services”), (ii) Ipsen JSC services related to the AS Program during the Ipsen First Term (the “Ipsen AS Program JSC Services”), (iii) and activities related to the negotiation of the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date. The Company has concluded that the Ipsen HD Program R&D Services and the Ipsen AS Program R&D Services are not distinct from the Ipsen HD Program JSC Services and the Ipsen AS Program JSC Services, respectively. The Company has also concluded that the Ipsen HD Program JSC Services and the Ipsen AS Program JSC Services are not distinct from the activities related to entering the Ipsen Supply Agreements for each respective program. The Ipsen JSC provided oversight and management of the overall Ipsen Collaboration Agreement, and the members of the Ipsen JSC from the Company have specialized industry knowledge, particularly as it relates to SNA technology. The Ipsen JSC was meant to facilitate the early stage research being performed and coordinate the activities of both the Company and Ipsen. Further, the Ipsen JSC services were critical to the ongoing evaluation of the Ipsen Collaboration Programs and the drafting and evaluation of the Ipsen First Option Data Package. The Ipsen JSC would also have provided oversight and management of the activities to enter into the Ipsen Supply Agreement. Accordingly, the Company’s participation on the Ipsen JSC was essential to Ipsen receiving value from the Ipsen HD Program R&D Services and the Ipsen AS Program R&D Services, and as such, (i) the Ipsen HD Program JSC Services, along with the Ipsen HD Program R&D Services and the activities related to entering the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date for that program are considered a single performance obligation (the “Ipsen HD Program Services”) and (ii) the Ipsen AS Program JSC Services along with the Ipsen AS Program R&D Services and the activities related to entering the Ipsen Supply Agreement within twelve months of the Ipsen Effective Date for that program are considered a single performance obligation (the “Ipsen AS Program Services”).

As of the Ipsen Effective Date, the total transaction price was determined to be $20,000, consisting solely of the Ipsen Upfront Payment. The Company also utilized the most likely amount method to estimate any development and regulatory milestone payments to be received. As of the Ipsen Effective Date, there were no milestones included in the transaction price. The preclinical, development, regulatory, and commercial milestones were fully constrained due to the significant uncertainties surrounding such payments. The Company considered the stage of development and the risks associated with the remaining development required to achieve the milestone, as well as whether the achievement of the milestone is outside the control of the Company or Ipsen. The Company has determined that any commercial milestones and sales-based royalties will be recognized when the related sales occur and therefore, they have also been excluded from the transaction price. The Company re-evaluated the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events were resolved or other changes in circumstances occurred. As of the Ipsen Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company determined that the total transaction price was $20,000.

On November 13, 2019 (the “AbbVie Effective Date”), the Company entered into a Collaboration, Option and License Agreement (the “AbbVie Collaboration Agreement”), with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allergan plc, Allergan. On May 8, 2020, Allergan plc, including Allergan was acquired by AbbVie. Pursuant to the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company granted to AbbVie exclusive access and options to license SNA-based therapeutics arising from two collaboration programs related to the treatment of hair loss disorders (each, an “AbbVie Collaboration Program”). Under each such license (obtained in connection with the exercise of an AbbVie Option, as defined and discussed further below), the Company would grant to AbbVie exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable, nontransferable, worldwide rights to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize such SNA therapeutics. Under the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company was to use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct the AbbVie Collaboration Programs, each focused on one or more hair loss disorders to discover one or more SNA products that are directed to, bind to or inhibit one or more specific AbbVie Collaboration Program targets.

On December 13, 2022 (the “AbbVie Termination Agreement Effective Date”), the Company and Allergan entered into a letter agreement (the “AbbVie Termination Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties mutually agreed to terminate the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement. Following such termination, the Company transferred to Allergan all data, information, and reports made or generated by the Company in the course of performing activities under the Development Plan (as defined in the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement), and granted to Allergan all rights to transfer, publish, present, or otherwise publicly disclose any Collaboration Technology (as defined in the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement) and data made or generated by the Company in the course of performing activities under the Development Plan. As a result of the termination of the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company regained the ability to independently develop medicines targeting hair loss disorders.

As of the AbbVie Effective Date and through the AbbVie Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company and AbbVie had agreed upon a development plan for each AbbVie Collaboration Program that described the development activities and timelines required to advance such AbbVie Collaboration Program through its first IND filing (each, an “AbbVie Development Plan”). The activities described in the AbbVie Development Plan were conducted under the supervision of the AbbVie Joint Development Committee (the “AbbVie JDC”) consisting of three members from each of the Company and AbbVie. The Company was primarily responsible for performing early-stage discovery and preclinical activities (the “AbbVie Collaboration Program Initial Development Activities”) set forth in the AbbVie Development Plan for each AbbVie Collaboration Program and would have been solely responsible for all costs and expenses related to the AbbVie Collaboration Program Initial Development Activities. AbbVie had the right to elect, in its sole discretion and at its sole cost and expense, to conduct formulation assessment and in vivo testing as set forth in an AbbVie Development Plan.

In the event of completion of all AbbVie Initial Development Activities, the Company would have been required to deliver to AbbVie a report that described the results of the AbbVie Initial Development Activities and identified at least one SNA-based compound that satisfies certain criteria for such AbbVie Collaboration Program as determined by the AbbVie JDC (the “AbbVie Initial Development Report”). Following the delivery of the AbbVie Initial Development Report for an AbbVie Collaboration Program, AbbVie would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an option (each an “AbbVie Option”) to obtain worldwide rights and license to the Company’s SNA technology and the Company’s interest in joint collaboration technology to make, have made, import, use, sell or offer for sale any product (each an “AbbVie

At AbbVie’s sole option, AbbVie had the right to extend the AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period (the “AbbVie Option Extension”) and require the Company to perform IND-enabling activities described in the AbbVie Development Plan (the “AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities”), subject to the payment of additional consideration (“AbbVie Extension Exercise”). If AbbVie exercised the AbbVie Option Extension, the Company would have been responsible for conducting the AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities and would have been solely responsible for all costs and expenses associated with such activities. In the event of completion of the AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities, the Company would have been required to deliver a report that describes the results of the AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities (the “AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities Data Package”) to AbbVie. Following the delivery of AbbVie IND-Enabling Activities Data Package, AbbVie would have had the ability for a defined period of time (the “AbbVie Extended Option Exercise Period”) to exercise an AbbVie Option with respect to such AbbVie Collaboration Program. After the exercise of an AbbVie Option with respect to an AbbVie Collaboration Program, AbbVie would have been responsible for all development, manufacturing and commercialization activities, and costs and expense associated with such activities in connection with AbbVie Licensed Products arising from such AbbVie Collaboration Program.

Under the terms of the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company received a $25,000 upfront, non-refundable, non-creditable cash payment (the “AbbVie Upfront Payment”) related to the Company’s research and development costs for conducting the AbbVie Development Plan for two AbbVie Collaboration Programs, each focused on one or more targets, and certain options to obtain exclusive, worldwide licenses under certain intellectual property rights owned or controlled by the Company to develop, manufacture and commercialize certain products resulting from each such AbbVie Collaboration Programs. The option exercise fee during the AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period was $10,000 per AbbVie Collaboration Program. If AbbVie elected to extend the AbbVie Initial Option Exercise Period, AbbVie would have been required to pay an additional fee of $10,000. If AbbVie elected to exercise its option during the AbbVie Extended Option Exercise Period, AbbVie would have been required to pay the Company the option exercise fee of $15,000.

Following the exercise by AbbVie of an AbbVie Option with respect to an AbbVie Collaboration Program, AbbVie would have been required to make certain milestone payments to the Company upon the achievement of specified development, product approval and launch, and commercial events, on an AbbVie Licensed Product by AbbVie Licensed Product basis. On an AbbVie Licensed Product by AbbVie Licensed Product basis, for the first AbbVie Licensed Product to achieve the associated milestone event, the Company was eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $55,000 for development milestone payments and $132,500 for product approval and launch milestone payments. The Company was also eligible for up to $175,000 in sales milestone payments on an AbbVie Collaboration Program by AbbVie Collaboration Program basis, associated with aggregate worldwide sales. Certain product approval milestones were subject to certain reductions under specified circumstances, including for payments required to be made by AbbVie to obtain certain third-party intellectual property rights.

In addition, to the extent there was any AbbVie Licensed Product, the Company would have been entitled to receive tiered royalty payments of mid-single digits to the mid-teens percentage on future net worldwide product sales of such AbbVie Licensed Products, subject to certain reductions under specified circumstances. Royalties were due on a AbbVie Licensed Product by AbbVie Licensed Product and country by country basis from the date of the first commercial sale of each AbbVie Licensed Product in a country until the latest to occur of: (i) the expiration date in such country of the last to expire valid claim within the licensed intellectual property covering the manufacture, use or sale of such AbbVie Licensed Product in such country, (ii) the tenth anniversary of the first commercial sale of such AbbVie Licensed Product in such country, and (iii) the expiration of regulatory exclusivity for such AbbVie Licensed Product in such country.

The Company concluded that AbbVie was a customer in this arrangement, and as such the arrangement falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. Under the AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, the Company has identified a single performance obligation that includes (i) the research and development activities during the AbbVie Research Term (the “AbbVie R&D Services”), and (ii) AbbVie Joint Development Committee services during the AbbVie Research Term (the “AbbVie JDC Services”). The Company has concluded that the AbbVie R&D Services is not distinct from the AbbVie JDC Services during the AbbVie Research Term. The AbbVie JDC provided oversight and management of the overall AbbVie Collaboration Agreement, and the members of the AbbVie JDC from the Company have specialized industry knowledge, particularly as it relates to SNA technology. The AbbVie JDC was meant to facilitate the early-stage research being performed and coordinate the activities of both the Company and AbbVie. Further, the AbbVie JDC services were critical to the ongoing evaluation of an AbbVie Collaboration Program and the drafting and evaluation of the AbbVie Initial Development Report and the AbbVie IND-Enabling Data Package. Accordingly, the Company’s participation on the AbbVie JDC was essential to AbbVie receiving value from the AbbVie R&D Services and as such, the AbbVie JDC Services along with the AbbVie R&D Services are considered one performance obligation (the “AbbVie Collaboration Program Services”). In addition, the Company has concluded that the option to purchase two development and commercialization licenses was considered a marketing offer as the options did not provide any discounts or other rights that would be considered a material right in the arrangement, and thus, not a performance obligation at the onset of the agreement. The consideration for these options would have been accounted for when they are exercised.

As of the AbbVie Effective Date, the total transaction price was determined to be $25,000, consisting solely of the AbbVie Upfront Payment. The Company also utilized the most likely amount method to estimate any development and regulatory milestone payments to be received. As of the AbbVie Effective Date, there were no milestones included in the transaction price. The milestones were fully constrained due to the significant uncertainties surrounding such payments. The Company considered the stage of development and the risks associated with the remaining development required to achieve the milestone, as well as whether the achievement of the milestone is outside the control of the Company or AbbVie. The Company has determined that any commercial milestones and sales-based royalties will be recognized when the related sales occur and therefore they have also been excluded from the transaction price. The Company re-evaluated the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events were resolved or other changes in circumstances occurred. As of the AbbVie Termination Agreement Effective Date, the Company determined the total transaction price was $25,000.