As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2018

Registration No. 333-224306

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

CISION LTD.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Articles of Association)

 

Cayman Islands		7372		N/A
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

130 E. Randolph Street
7^th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 922-2400

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

 

Jack Pearlstein, Chief Financial Officer
130 E. Randolph Street
7^th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 922-2400

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

 

Copies to:

Dennis M. Myers, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60654 (312) 862-2000		David Peinsipp Cooley LLP 3175 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 (650) 843-5000

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box. o

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o
		Emerging growth company x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. o

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer) o

Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross Border Third-Party Tender Offer) o

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered		Amount to be Registered				Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share				Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price				Amount of Registration Fee(4)
Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share			6,370,000(1)(2)			$	12.23	(3)		$	77,905,100	(3)		$	9,699.18	(6)
Warrants to purchase Ordinary Shares			12,250,000	(5)			N/A				N/A				N/A	(7)

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The information in this document may change. The registrant may not complete the offer and issue these securities until the registration statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This document is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities, in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale is not permitted or would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

PRELIMINARY — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MAY 9, 2018

OFFER TO EXCHANGE

Offer to Exchange Warrants to Acquire Ordinary Shares
of
Cision Ltd.
for
Ordinary Shares of Cision Ltd.
and
Consent Solicitation

THE OFFER PERIOD (AS DEFINED BELOW) AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 11:59 P.M., EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, ON MAY 15, 2018, OR SUCH LATER TIME AND DATE TO WHICH WE MAY EXTEND.

Terms of the Offer and Consent Solicitation

Until the Expiration Date (as defined below), we are offering to the holders of our warrants as described below the opportunity to receive 0.26 ordinary shares, par value of $0.0001 per share (“Ordinary Shares”) of Cision Ltd. (“Cision”) in exchange for each of our outstanding warrants tendered by the holder and exchanged pursuant to the offer (the “Offer”). The Offer is being made to:

Each Warrant holder whose Warrants are exchanged pursuant to the Offer will receive 0.26 of our Ordinary Shares for each Warrant tendered by such holder and exchanged. No fractional Ordinary Shares will be issued pursuant to the Offer. In lieu of issuing fractional shares, any holder of Warrants who would otherwise have been entitled to receive fractional shares pursuant to the Offer will, after aggregating all such fractional shares of such holder, be paid in cash (without interest) in an amount equal to such fractional part of a share multiplied by the last sale price of our Ordinary Shares on NYSE on the last trading day of the Offer Period (as defined below). Our obligation to complete the Offer is not conditioned on the receipt of a minimum number of tendered Warrants.

Concurrently with the Offer, we are also soliciting consents (the “Consent Solicitation”) from holders of the Warrants to amend (the “Warrant Amendment”) the Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2017, by and between Cision and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “Warrant Agreement”), which governs all of the Warrants to permit the Company to require that each outstanding Warrant be converted into 0.234 Ordinary Shares, which is a ratio 10% less than the ratio applicable to the Offer. Pursuant to the terms of the Warrant Agreement, the consent of holders of at least a majority of the outstanding Warrants is required to approve the Warrant Amendment, with the Public Warrant

TABLE OF CONTENTS

holders and Private Warrant holders voting together. Therefore, one of the conditions to the adoption of the Warrant Amendment is the receipt of the consent of holders of at least a majority of the outstanding Warrants. You may not consent to the Warrant Amendment without tendering your Warrants in the Offer and you may not tender your Warrants without consenting to the Warrant Amendment. The consent to the Warrant Amendment is a part of the letter of transmittal and consent relating to the Warrants, and therefore by tendering your warrants for exchange you will deliver to us your consent. You may revoke your consent at any time prior to the Expiration Date (as defined below) by withdrawing the Warrants you have tendered.

The Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner have advised us that they intend to tender all of the Private Warrants held by them in the Offer. Collectively, the Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner hold approximately 94.5% of the Private Warrants, representing approximately 31.8% of the total Warrants outstanding. See the section of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange entitled “The Offer and Consent Solicitation — Transactions and Agreements Concerning Our Securities.”

The Offer and Consent Solicitation is made solely upon the terms and conditions in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and in the related letter of transmittal and consent (as it may be supplemented and amended from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal and Consent”). The Offer and Consent Solicitation will be open until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 15, 2018, or such later time and date to which we may extend (the period during which the Offer and Consent Solicitation is open, giving effect to any withdrawal or extension, is referred to as the “Offer Period,” and the date and time at which the Offer Period ends is referred to as the “Expiration Date”). The Offer and Consent Solicitation is not made to those holders who reside in states or other jurisdictions where an offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

We may withdraw the Offer and Consent Solicitation only if the conditions to the Offer and Consent Solicitation are not satisfied or waived prior to the Expiration Date. Promptly upon any such withdrawal, we will return the tendered Warrants to the holders (and the consent to the Warrant Amendment will be revoked).

You may tender some or all of your Warrants into the Offer. If you elect to tender Warrants in response to the Offer and Consent Solicitation, please follow the instructions in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and the related documents, including the Letter of Transmittal and Consent. If you tender Warrants, you may withdraw your tendered Warrants at any time before the Expiration Date and retain them on their current terms or amended terms if the Warrant Amendment is approved, by following the instructions in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. In addition, tendered Warrants that are not accepted by us for exchange by June 12, 2018, may thereafter be withdrawn by you until such time as the Warrants are accepted by us for exchange. If you withdraw the tender of your Warrants, your consent to the Warrant Amendment will be withdrawn as a result.

Warrants not exchanged for our Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Offer will remain outstanding subject to their current terms or amended terms if the Warrant Amendment is approved. We reserve the right to redeem any of the Warrants, as applicable, pursuant to their current terms at any time, including prior to the completion of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, and if the Warrant Amendment is approved, we intend to require the conversion of all outstanding Warrants to Ordinary Shares as provided in the Warrant Amendment. Our Public Warrants are currently listed on NYSE American under the symbol “CISN.WS”; however, NYSE may delist our Public Warrants if, following the completion of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of outstanding Warrants has become so reduced as to make further listing inadvisable.

The Offer and Consent Solicitation is conditioned upon the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding the Ordinary Shares issuable upon exchange of the Warrants pursuant to the Offer. This Prospectus/Offer to Exchange forms a part of the registration statement.

Our board of directors has approved the Offer and Consent Solicitation. However, neither we nor any of our management, our board of directors, or the information agent, the exchange agent or the dealer manager for the Offer and Consent Solicitation is making any recommendation as to whether holders of Warrants should tender Warrants for exchange in the Offer and consent to the Warrant Amendment in the Consent Solicitation. Each holder of a Warrant must make its own decision as to whether to exchange some or all of its Warrants and consent to the Warrant Amendment.

All questions concerning the terms of the Offer and Consent Solicitation should be directed to the dealer manager:

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013
United States of America
Attention: Equity Capital Markets
Tel: (212) 723-7450

All questions concerning exchange procedures and requests for additional copies of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, the Letter of Transmittal and Consent or the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery should be directed to the information agent:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

D.F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street, 22^nd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Banks and Brokers Call Collect: (212) 269-5550
All Others Call Toll-Free: (800) 967-4607
Email: cision@dfking.com

We will amend our offering materials, including this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, to the extent required by applicable securities laws to disclose any material changes to information previously published, sent or given to Warrant holders.

The securities offered by this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange involve risks. Before participating in the Offer and consenting to the Warrant Amendment, you are urged to read carefully the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission or any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Through the Offer, we are soliciting your consent to the Warrant Amendment. By tendering your Warrants, you will be delivering your consent to the proposed Warrant Amendment, which consent will be effective upon our acceptance of the Warrants for exchange.

The dealer manager for the Offer and Consent Solicitation is:

Citigroup

This Prospectus/Offer to Exchange is dated May 9, 2018.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS/OFFER TO EXCHANGE			ii
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS			iii
FREQUENTLY USED TERMS			v
SUMMARY			1
RISK FACTORS			7
THE OFFER AND CONSENT SOLICITATION			35
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION			57
BUSINESS OF CISION AND CERTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT CISION			58
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			66
MANAGEMENT			92
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK			107
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS			110
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT			113
LEGAL MATTERS			115
EXPERTS			115
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION			115
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION			F-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS/OFFER TO EXCHANGE

This Prospectus/Offer to Exchange is a part of the registration statement that we filed on Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should read this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, including the detailed information regarding our company, Ordinary Shares and Warrants, and the financial statements and the notes to those statements that appear elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and any applicable prospectus supplement.

You should rely only on the information contained in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and in any accompanying prospectus supplement. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. If anyone makes any recommendation or representation to you, or gives you any information, you must not rely upon that recommendation, representation or information as having been authorized by us. We and the dealer manager take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. You should not assume that the information in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange or any prospectus supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of those documents. You should not consider this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange to be an offer or solicitation relating to the securities in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation relating to the securities is not authorized. Furthermore, you should not consider this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange to be an offer or solicitation relating to the securities if the person making the offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so, or if it is unlawful for you to receive such an offer or solicitation.

Unless the context requires otherwise, in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, we use the terms “the Company”, “Cision”, “our company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and similar references to refer to Cision Ltd. and its subsidiaries.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements made in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, such as statements about our future financial performance, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “goal,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “approximately,” “shall” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements contained in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange include, but are not limited to, statements about:

We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. You should not

TABLE OF CONTENTS

place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements in deciding whether to invest in our securities. We cannot assure you that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions, including the risk factors set forth on page 7 of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, that may cause our actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements.

In addition, statements that “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain, and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these statements.

You should read this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS

In this Registration Statement:

“Business Combination” means that certain business combination contemplated by that certain merger agreement, dated as of March 19, 2017, by and among Cision, Capitol, our Predecessor, Cision Owner and Capitol Acquisition Merger Sub., Inc. and consummated as of June 29, 2017.

“Capitol” means Capitol Acquisition Corp. III.

“Capitol IPO” means the initial public offering of Capitol’s securities on October 13, 2015.

“Capitol Sponsors” mean certain sponsors of Capitol.

“Cision” means Cision Ltd., an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability.

“Cision Board” means the board of directors of Cision.

“Cision Owner” means Canyon Holdings (Cayman), L.P.

“Consent Solicitation” means the solicitation of consent from the holders of the Warrants to approve the Warrant Amendment.

“Expiration Date” means 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on May 15, 2018.

“Letter of Transmittal and Consent” means the letter of transmittal and consent (as it may be supplemented and amended from time to time) related to the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

“Offer” means the opportunity to receive 0.26 Ordinary Shares in exchange for each of our outstanding warrants, up to an aggregate of (i) 4,225,000 of Ordinary Shares in exchange for all 16,250,000 Public Warrants and (ii) 2,145,000 of Ordinary Shares in exchange for all 8,250,000 Private Warrants.

“Offer Period” means the period during which the Offer and Consent Solicitation is open, giving effect to any withdrawal or extension.

“Ordinary Shares” means the ordinary shares, with a par value of $0.0001 per share, of Cision.

“Predecessor” means Canyon Holdings S.à r.l., our accounting predecessor.

“Private Warrants” mean our warrants to purchase Ordinary Shares that were privately issued to the Capitol Sponsors in connection with the Capitol IPO and to Cision Owner in connection with the consummation of our Business Combination, entitling each holder to purchase one Ordinary Share for a purchase price of $11.50, subject to adjustments.

“Public Warrants” mean our publicly traded warrants to purchase our Ordinary Shares that were originally issued as warrants to purchase the common stock of Capitol and automatically converted into warrants to purchase Ordinary Shares in connection with the consummation of our Business Combination on June 29, 2017, entitling each holder to purchase one Ordinary Share for a purchase price of $11.50, subject to adjustments.

“Warrant Agreement” means the Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2017, by and between Cision and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

“Warrant Amendment” means the an amendment to the Warrant Agreement permitting Cision to require that each outstanding Warrant be converted into 0.234 Ordinary Shares, which is a ratio 10% less than the ratio applicable to the Offer.

“Warrants” mean the Public Warrants and the Private Warrants.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

In this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, unless otherwise stated, the terms “the Company,” “Cision,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Cision Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Except where noted, references to our business, operations, properties, financial results, operating and other information relating to periods prior to the consummation of the Business Combination on June 29, 2017, refer to the business, operations, properties, financial results, operating and other information of Canyon Holdings S.à r.l., our accounting predecessor.

The Offer and Consent Solicitation

This summary provides a brief overview of the key aspects of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. Because it is only a summary, it does not contain all of the detailed information contained elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange or in the documents included as exhibits to the registration statement that contains this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. Accordingly, you are urged to carefully review this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange in its entirety (including all documents filed as exhibits to the registration statement that contains this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, which may be obtained by following the procedures set forth herein in the section entitled “Where You Can Find Additional Information”).

Summary of The Offer and Consent Solicitation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results could be harmed by any of these risks, as well as other risks not currently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial. The trading price of our securities could decline due to any of these risks, and, as a result, you may lose all or part of your investment. As used in the risks described in this subsection, references to “we,” “us” and “our” are intended to refer to Cision unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

Risks Related To Our Business

Our industry is highly competitive.

We face intense competition from numerous large and small businesses. This competition includes both product and price competition. Increased competition may result in a decline in our market share thereby adversely affecting our operating results. The markets in which we operate are fragmented, competitive and rapidly evolving, and there are limited barriers to entry to certain segments of those markets. We expect the intensity of competition to increase in the future as existing competitors develop their capabilities and as new companies enter our markets. If we are unable to compete effectively, it will be difficult for us to maintain our market share and pricing rates and add and retain customers, and our business, financial condition and results of operations will be seriously harmed.

Increased competition could result in pricing pressure, reduced sales or lower margins. We face intense price competition in all areas of our business. In particular, the cloud-based PR services business, the media intelligence business and the media distribution business are characterized by intense price competition. Our profit margin, and therefore our profitability, is dependent on the rates we are able to charge for our services. We have in the past lowered prices, and may need to do so in the future, to attempt to gain or maintain market share. These strategies have not always been successful and have at times hurt operating performance. Additionally, we have also been, and may once again be, required to adjust pricing to respond to actions by competitors, which could adversely impact operating results. The rates we are able to charge for our services are affected by a number of factors, including competition, volume fluctuations, productivity of employees and processes, the value our customers derive from our services and general economic and political conditions. We are also subject to potential price competition from new competitors and from existing competitors. If we are unable to compete successfully in respect to the pricing of our services and products, our business, financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services than we can. To the extent our competitors have an existing relationship with a potential customer, that customer may be unwilling to switch vendors due to existing time and financial commitments with our competitors.

We also expect that new competitors will enter the cloud-based PR services and distribution market with competing products. Many of these potential competitors have established or may establish business, financial or strategic relationships among themselves or with existing or potential customers, alliance partners or other third parties or may combine and consolidate to become more formidable competitors with better resources. It is possible that these new competitors could rapidly acquire significant market share.

If we are unable to compete successfully in this environment, our business, financial condition and operating results will be adversely affected.

Economic conditions and market factors, which are beyond our control, may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Our business performance is impacted by a number of factors, including economic and market volatility, changes in PR and marketing spending patterns, budgets and priorities, general economic conditions in North America, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia, and other factors that are generally beyond our control. To the extent that global or national economic conditions weaken, our business is likely to be

TABLE OF CONTENTS

negatively impacted. Adverse market conditions could reduce customer demand for our services and the ability of our customers, suppliers and other counterparties to meet their obligations to us. A reduction in customer demand for our products and services due to economic conditions or other market factors could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

System limitations or failures could harm our business.

Our businesses depend on the integrity and performance of the technology, computer, cloud and communications systems supporting them. We manage our services and serve our customers from a limited number of data center facilities and/or cloud computing services facilities located within the United States and abroad. If the systems on which we depend cannot expand to cope with increased demand or otherwise fail to perform, we could experience unanticipated disruptions in service, slower response times and delays in the introduction of new products and services. These systems may be vulnerable to damage or service interruption resulting from human error, intentional bad acts, cybersecurity attacks, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, war, terrorist attacks, power losses, hardware failures, systems failures, telecommunications failures and similar events. Given our position in the global PR and media intelligence industry, we may be more likely than other companies to be a direct target, or an indirect casualty, of such events.

These consequences could result in service outages, financial losses, decreased customer service and satisfaction and regulatory sanctions. The solutions we provide are susceptible to telecommunication system failures, data corruption or virus attacks, and they have experienced systems failures and delays in the past and could experience future systems failures and delays. We have, for example, experienced temporary system outages and service degradation related to telecommunication, cloud computing and network provider interruptions, denial-of-service attacks and equipment failures.

Although we currently maintain and expect to maintain multiple computer facilities that are designed to provide redundancy and back-up to reduce the risk of system disruptions and have facilities in place that are expected to maintain service during a system disruption, such systems and facilities may prove inadequate. If unanticipated events occur, we may need to expand and upgrade our technology, transaction processing systems and network infrastructure. We do not know whether we will be able to accurately project the rate, timing or cost of any increases, or expand and upgrade our systems and infrastructure to accommodate any increases in a timely manner.

While we have programs in place to identify and minimize our exposure to vulnerabilities and work in collaboration with the technology industry to share corrective measures with our business partners, we cannot guarantee that such events will not occur in the future. Any system issue that causes an interruption in services, decreases the responsiveness of our services or otherwise affects our services could impair our reputation, damage our brand name, result in regulatory penalties and other liability, and negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

To the extent that any of our vendors or other third-party service providers experience difficulties, materially change their business relationship with us or are unable for any reason to perform their obligations, our business or our reputation may be materially adversely affected.

We must continue to introduce new products, initiatives and enhancements to maintain our competitive position.

The PR software and media intelligence industries are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry and regulatory standards, new product and service introductions, frequent enhancements to existing products and services, the emergence of competitors, the adoption of new services and products and changing customer demands, needs and preferences. We must complete development of, successfully implement and maintain platforms that have the functionality, performance, capacity, reliability and speed required by our business, as well as by our customers. While we intend to launch new products and initiatives and continue to explore and pursue opportunities to strengthen our business and grow our company, we may not be able to keep up with rapid technological and other competitive changes affecting our industry. For example, we must continue to enhance our platforms to remain competitive, and our business will be negatively affected if our platforms or the technology solutions we sell to our customers fail to function as expected. If we are unable to develop our platforms to include other products and markets, or if our platforms do not have the required

TABLE OF CONTENTS

functionality, performance, capacity, reliability and speed required by our customers, we may not be able to compete successfully. We may spend substantial time and money developing new products and initiatives. If these products and initiatives are not successful, we may not be able to offset their costs, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Further, our failure to anticipate or respond adequately to changes in technology and customer preferences or any significant delays in product development efforts, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

In our technology operations, we have invested substantial amounts in the development of system platforms and in the rollout of our platforms. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we spent $22.1 million on research and development activities and $15.0 million in capitalized software development costs, and such figures may increase in the future as we strive to develop new products and solutions for our customers. Although investments are carefully planned, there can be no assurance that the demand for such platforms will justify the related investments and that the future levels of transactions executed on these platforms will be sufficient to generate an acceptable return on such investments. We also cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete effectively with new vendors, or that products, services or technologies developed by others will not render our services non-competitive or obsolete. If we fail to generate adequate revenue from planned system platforms or new products or services, or if we fail to do so within the envisioned timeframe, it could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, customers may delay purchases in anticipation of new products or enhancements.

Our credit facilities contain restrictive covenants that may restrict our ability to take certain actions or capitalize on business opportunities.

Our credit facilities contain operating covenants and financial covenants that may limit management’s discretion with respect to certain business matters. Among other things, these covenants will restrict our ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends, redeem stock, change the nature of our business, sell or otherwise dispose of assets, make acquisitions or investments, and merge or consolidate with other entities. As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we will be limited in how we conduct our business and we may be unable to raise additional debt or other financing to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities. In addition, our credit facilities contain covenants that require us to comply with a number of financial ratios, the breach of which could trigger a default that could, in turn, trigger defaults under other debt obligations. The terms of any future indebtedness we may incur could include more restrictive covenants. Failure to comply with such restrictive covenants may lead to default and acceleration under our credit facilities and may impair our ability to conduct business. We may not be able to maintain compliance with these covenants in the future and, if we fail to do so, we may be unable to obtain waivers from the lenders and/or amend the covenants. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a description of our credit facilities.

We will need to invest in our operations to maintain and grow our business and to consummate and integrate acquisitions, and we may need additional funds, which may not be readily available.

We depend on the availability of adequate capital to maintain and develop our business. Although we believe that we can meet our current capital requirements from internally generated funds, cash on hand and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility, we may finance future acquisitions by issuing additional equity and/or debt, and if the capital and credit markets experience volatility, access to capital or credit may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

Limited access to capital or credit in the future could have an impact on our ability to refinance debt, maintain our credit rating, meet our regulatory capital requirements, engage in strategic initiatives, make acquisitions or strategic investments in other companies or react to changing economic and business conditions. If we are unable to fund our capital or credit requirements, it could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

In addition to our debt obligations, we will need to continue to invest in our operations for the foreseeable future to integrate acquired businesses and to fund new initiatives. If we do not achieve the expected

TABLE OF CONTENTS

operating results, we will need to reallocate our cash resources. This may include borrowing additional funds to service debt payments, which may impair our ability to make investments in our business or to integrate acquired businesses.

Should we need to raise funds by issuing additional equity, our equity holders will suffer dilution. In addition, announcement or implementation of future transactions by us or others could have a material effect on the price of our equity. Should we need to raise funds by incurring additional debt, we may become subject to covenants even more restrictive than those contained in our credit facilities and our other debt instruments. The issuance of additional debt could increase our leverage substantially. We could face financial risks associated with incurring additional debt, particularly if the debt results in significant incremental leverage. Additional debt may reduce our liquidity, curtail our access to financing markets, impact our standing with credit agencies and increase the cash flow required for debt service.

Any incremental debt incurred to finance an acquisition could also place significant constraints on the operation of our business. Furthermore, if adverse economic conditions occur, we could experience decreased revenues from our operations which could affect our ability to satisfy financial and other restrictive covenants to which we are subject under our existing indebtedness.

We may not be able to successfully integrate acquired businesses, which may result in an inability to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions and anticipated cost savings.

We must rationalize, coordinate and integrate the operations of our acquired businesses, including PR Newswire, Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM, Prime and other acquisitions we make in the future. This process involves complex technological, operational and personnel-related challenges, which are time-consuming and expensive and may disrupt our business. The difficulties, costs and delays that could be encountered may include:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For these reasons, we may not achieve the anticipated financial and strategic benefits from our acquisitions. Actual cost savings and synergies may be lower than we expect and may take a longer time to achieve than we anticipate, and we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions.

A material breach in security relating to our information systems and regulation related to such breaches could adversely affect us.

Information security risks have generally increased in recent years, in part because of the proliferation of new technologies and the use of the Internet, and the increased sophistication and activity of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, activists, cybercriminals and other external parties, some of which may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. For example, a cybercriminal could use cybersecurity threats to gain access to sensitive information about another company or to alter or disrupt news or information to be distributed by PR Newswire. Cybersecurity attacks are becoming more sophisticated and include malicious software, ransomware, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data, substantially damaging our reputation. Any person who circumvents our security measures could steal proprietary or confidential customer information or cause interruptions in our operations. We incur significant costs to protect against security breaches, and may incur significant additional costs to alleviate problems caused by any breaches. Our failure to prevent security breaches, or well-publicized security breaches affecting the Internet in general, could significantly harm our reputation and business and financial results.

Certain laws and regulations regarding data security affecting our customers impose requirements regarding the security of information maintained by these customers, as well as notification to persons whose personal information is accessed by an unauthorized third party. Certain laws may also require us to protect the security of our employees’ personal data.

As a result of any continuing legislative initiatives and customer demands, we may have to modify our operations with the goal of further improving data security. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any such modifications may result in increased expenses and operating complexity, and we may be unable to increase the rates we charge for our services sufficiently to offset these increases. Any failure on our part to comply with these laws, regulations and standards can result in negative publicity and diversion of management time and effort and may subject us to significant liabilities and other penalties.

If customer confidential information, including material non-public information or personal data we maintain, is inappropriately disclosed due to an information security breach, or if any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches controls or procedures with which we are responsible for complying with respect to such data or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we may have substantial liabilities to our clients. Any incidents with respect to the handling of such information

TABLE OF CONTENTS

could subject us to litigation or indemnification claims with our clients and other parties. In addition, any breach or alleged breach of our confidentiality agreements with our clients may result in termination of their engagements, resulting in associated loss of revenue and increased costs.

Our business relies on continued access to content on similar terms.

Our business relies on continuous access to content, which is increasingly generated digitally or via social media. If content providers interrupt continuous access, impose onerous terms for accessing content, refuse to do business with us or move their content behind digital paywalls without providing access to us, our future financial performance may be adversely affected. Such changes may have a material and adverse impact on our revenue, business, financial condition, and operations and could have an adverse effect on our future financial performance or position. We rely on third parties to license their technology and provide or make available certain data and other content for our information databases, our news monitoring service and our social media monitoring service.

Losing access to licensed technology and content, such as broadcast content, news outlets and social media platforms, could result in delays in the provision of our services until we develop, identify, license and integrate equivalent technology or content. These third parties may not renew agreements to provide licenses to us, or may increase the price they charge for their licenses.

Additionally, the quality of the technology content provided to us may not be acceptable to us and we may need to enter into agreements with additional third parties. Third-party licenses may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable or competitive terms, if at all. Any interruption or delay in the provision of our services could adversely affect our financial performance and ability to grow revenue, damage our business and adversely affect our results of operations by forcing customers to seek out other suppliers that can provide access to their desired licensed content. In the event we are unable to use such third-party technology or content or are unable to enter into agreements with third parties, we may not be successful in maintaining relationships with key customers and current customers may not renew their subscription agreements with us or continue purchasing solutions from us, and it may be difficult to acquire new customers which may have a material and adverse impact on our revenue, business, financial condition and operations.

We rely on third parties to perform certain functions, and our business could be adversely affected if these third parties fail to perform as expected. We rely on third parties for regulatory, data center, data storage, data content, clearing and other services. To the extent that any of our vendors or other third-party service providers experience difficulties, materially change their business relationship with us or are unable for any reason to perform their obligations, our business, reputation or our financial results may be materially adversely affected.

Damage to our reputation or brand name could have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

One of our competitive strengths is our strong reputation and brand name. We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of our brands and avoiding damage to our reputation is critical to our business. Successful promotion of our brands will depend largely on our ability to provide reliable and useful products and solutions. Various other issues may give rise to reputational risk, including issues relating to:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brands and protect our reputation, or if we incur substantial expenses in an unsuccessful attempt to promote and maintain our brands, we may fail to attract new customers or retain our existing customers to the extent necessary to realize a sufficient return on our brand-building and brand-maintaining efforts, and our business could suffer.

We may be required to recognize impairments of our goodwill, intangible assets or other long-lived assets in the future.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we account for the completion of our acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting. We allocate the total estimated purchase prices to net tangible assets, amortizable intangible assets and indefinite-lived intangible assets, and based on their fair values as of the date of completion of the acquisitions, recording the excess of the purchase price over those fair values as goodwill. Our financial results, including earnings per share, could be adversely affected by a number of financial adjustments required by U.S. GAAP. For example, we may have additional depreciation expense as a result of recording acquired tangible assets at fair value as compared to book value as recorded, or we may incur certain adjustments to reflect the financial condition and operating results under U.S. GAAP and in U.S. dollars.

Our business acquisitions typically result in the recording of goodwill and intangible assets, and the recorded values of those assets may become impaired in the future. As of December 31, 2017, goodwill totaled approximately $1,136.4 million and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, totaled approximately $456.3 million. The determination of the value of such goodwill and intangible assets requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements.

We assess goodwill and intangible assets, as well as other long-lived assets, including equity and cost method investments, and property and equipment for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. We estimate the fair value of such assets by assessing many factors, including historical performance, capital requirements and projected cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to project future cash flows and evaluate the impact of expected operating and macroeconomic changes on these cash flows. Although the estimates and assumptions we use are consistent with our internal planning process, there are inherent uncertainties in these estimates.

In addition, we may experience future events that may result in asset impairments. Future disruptions to our business, prolonged economic weakness or significant declines in operating results at any of our reporting units or businesses may result in impairment charges to goodwill, intangible assets or other long-lived assets. A significant impairment charge in the future could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

We may experience fluctuations in our operating results, which may adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and results of operations. For example, we experience fluctuations in our revenue and earnings as we integrate new acquisitions and based on the seasonal impact of corporate reporting. This and other factors may contribute to fluctuations in our results of operations from quarter to quarter. A high percentage of our operating expenses, particularly personnel and rent, are relatively fixed in advance of any particular quarter. As a result,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

unanticipated variations in our operating results may cause us to run our operations inefficiently over a period of time, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We are the subject of continuing litigation and governmental inquiries.

We are subject to various legal proceedings, governmental inquiries and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business and otherwise.

Any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, could harm our reputation and have an adverse impact on our reputation, brand and relationships with our customers and other third parties and could lead to additional related claims. Certain claims may seek injunctive relief and regulators, as part of settlements or otherwise, may seek to modify our products or services, which could disrupt the ordinary conduct of our business and operations, reduce our revenues or increase our cost of doing business. Any response to any such litigation or governmental investigation or claim may cause us to incur significant legal expenses. Substantial recovery against us or fines or penalties could have a material adverse impact on us, and unfavorable rulings, findings or recoveries in the other proceedings could have a material adverse impact on the operating results of the period in which the ruling or recovery occurs. See “Business of Cision and Certain Information about Cision — Legal Proceedings.”

Insurance may be insufficient to cover our liabilities.

Although we maintain global general liability insurance, including coverage for errors and omissions and employment practices, this coverage may be inadequate, or may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that these policies will cover any claim against us for loss of data or other indirect or consequential damages and defending a suit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and divert management’s attention.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could harm our brand-building efforts and ability to compete effectively.

To protect our intellectual property rights, we rely on a combination of trademark laws, copyright laws, patent laws, trade secret protection, confidentiality agreements and other contractual arrangements with our employees, affiliates, clients, strategic partners and others. The protective steps that we take may be inadequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information. Third parties may challenge, circumvent, infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property, or such intellectual property may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current market trends or otherwise to provide competitive advantages, which could result in costly redesign efforts, discontinuance of service offerings or other competitive harm. For example, competitors may try to use brand names confusingly similar to ours for similar services in order to benefit from our brand’s value. Others, including our competitors, may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our services or design around our intellectual property and, in such cases, we could not assert our intellectual property rights against such parties. Further, our contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our confidential information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of our confidential information, and we may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights.

We have registered, or applied to register, our trademarks in the United States and in over 25 foreign jurisdictions. We also maintain copyright protection on our tangible materials and pursue patent protection for software products, inventions and other processes developed by us. We also hold a number of patents, patent applications and licenses in the United States and other foreign jurisdictions. However, we cannot guarantee that any of our pending patent applications will issue or be approved, and that our existing and future intellectual property rights will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology and proprietary information or provide us with any competitive advantages. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process and after a patent has issued. There are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. If this occurs, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

business. Effective trademark, copyright, patent and trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which we offer our services. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit. Further, intellectual property law, including statutory and case law, particularly in the United States, is constantly developing, and any changes in the law could make it harder for us to enforce our rights. Failure to protect our intellectual property adequately could harm our brand and affect our ability to compete effectively. Further, we may not always detect infringement of our intellectual property rights, and defending our intellectual property rights, even if successfully detected, prosecuted, enjoined, or remedied, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could put our intellectual property at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our related pending patent applications at risk of not issuing. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential or sensitive information could be compromised by disclosure in the event of litigation. In addition, during the course of litigation there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Moreover, a significant portion of our intellectual property has been acquired from one or more third parties. While we have conducted diligence with respect to such acquisitions, because we did not participate in the development or prosecution of much of the acquired intellectual property, we cannot guarantee that our diligence efforts identified and/or remedied all issues related to such intellectual property, including potential ownership errors, potential errors during prosecution of such intellectual property, and potential encumbrances that could limit our ability to enforce such intellectual property rights.

Third parties may assert intellectual property rights claims against us, which may be costly to defend, could require the payment of damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies, trademarks or other intellectual property.

We may be subject to costly litigation if our services and technology are alleged to infringe upon or otherwise violate a third party’s proprietary rights. Third parties may have, or may eventually be issued, patents that could be infringed by our products, services or technology. Because patent applications can take years to issue and are often afforded confidentiality for some period of time there may currently be pending applications, unknown to us, that later result in issued patents that could cover one or more of our products. Any of these third parties could make a claim of infringement against us with respect to our products, services or technology. We may also be obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners or pay substantial settlement costs, including royalty payments, in connection with any such claim or litigation and to obtain licenses, modify applications or refund fees, which could be costly. We have been and may also be in the future subject to claims by third parties for patent, copyright or trademark infringement, breach of license or violation of other third-party intellectual property rights.

Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management resources and attention. In a patent infringement claim against us, we may assert, as a defense, that we do not infringe the relevant patent claims, that the patent is invalid or both. The strength of our defenses will depend on the patents asserted, the interpretation of these patents, and our ability to invalidate the asserted patents. However, we could be unsuccessful in advancing non-infringement and/or invalidity arguments in our defense. In the United States, issued patents enjoy a presumption of validity, and the party challenging the validity of a patent claim must present clear and convincing evidence of invalidity, which is a high burden of proof. Conversely, the patent owner need only prove infringement by a preponderance of the evidence, which is a lower burden of proof. Successful challenges against us could require us to modify or discontinue our use of technology or business processes where such use is found to infringe or violate the rights of others, enter into costly settlement or license agreements, pay costly damage awards, face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting us from marketing or selling certain of our products or services or purchase licenses from third parties, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Additionally, in recent years, individuals and groups have been purchasing intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement or other violations and attempting to extract settlements from companies like ours. Even if we have an agreement for indemnification against costs associated with litigation, the indemnifying party, if any in such circumstances, may be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. If we cannot or do not license the infringed technology on reasonable terms or substitute similar technology from another source, our revenue and earnings could be adversely impacted.

Moreover, our intellectual property acquired from one or more third parties may have previously been the subject of one or more intellectual property infringement suits and/or allegations. While we have conducted diligence with respect to such acquisitions, we cannot guarantee that our diligence efforts identified and/or remedied all issues related to such intellectual property infringement suits and/or allegations. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that we understand and/or have complied with all obligations related to the settlement of such intellectual property suits and/or the resolution of such intellectual property allegations.

Future acquisitions, investments, partnerships and joint ventures may require significant resources and/or result in significant unanticipated losses, costs or liabilities.

Over the past several years, acquisitions have been significant factors in our growth. Although we cannot predict our rate of growth as the result of acquisitions with complete accuracy, we believe that additional acquisitions and investments or entering into partnerships and joint ventures will be important to our growth strategy. Such transactions may be material in size and scope. There can be no assurances that we will be able to complete suitable acquisitions for a variety of reasons, including the identification of and competition for acquisition targets, the need for regulatory approvals, the inability of the parties to agree to the structure or purchase price of the transaction, competition from competitors interested in making similar acquisitions and our inability to finance the transaction on commercially acceptable terms.

Therefore, we cannot be sure that we will be able to complete future transactions on terms favorable to us.

Furthermore, any future acquisitions or investments in businesses or facilities could entail a number of additional risks, including:

Changes in tax laws, regulations or policies, tax rates or tax assets and liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

As a global company, we, like other corporations, are subject to taxes at the U.S. federal, state and local levels, as well as in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required to determine and estimate worldwide tax liabilities. Changes in tax laws, regulations or policies and the amount and composition of pre-tax income in countries with differing tax rates or valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities could result in us having to pay or accrue higher taxes, which would in turn reduce our net income.

We are subject to potential regular examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities (for example, we are currently under audit in the United States for the tax period ended December 31, 2014), and from time to time we initiate amendments to previously filed tax returns. We regularly assess the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from these examinations and amendments to determine the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

adequacy of our provision for income taxes, which requires estimates and judgments. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the tax authorities will agree with such estimates. We may have to engage in litigation to achieve the results reflected in the estimates, which may be time-consuming and expensive. We cannot assure you that we will be successful or that any final determination will not be materially different from the treatment reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, some of our subsidiaries are subject to tax in the jurisdictions in which they are organized or operate. In computing our tax obligation in these jurisdictions, we take various tax positions. We cannot assure you that upon review of these positions the applicable authorities will agree with our positions. A successful challenge by a tax authority could result in additional tax imposed on our subsidiaries. Our non-U.S. businesses operate in various international markets, particularly emerging markets that are subject to greater political, economic and social uncertainties than developed countries. In certain of the countries in which we operate, tax authorities may exercise significant discretionary and arbitrary powers to make tax demands or decline to refund payments that may be due to us as per tax returns. As a result, applicable tax laws in jurisdictions where we do business could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainties in the interpretation and application of recent U.S. legislation on tax reform could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a partial territorial system, a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017 and new limitations on the deductibility of interest. We have calculated our best estimate of the impact of the Act in our year end income tax provision in accordance with our understanding of the Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing and as a result have recorded $11.9 million as additional income tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2017, the period in which the legislation was enacted. This provisional amount relates to the remeasurement of U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, an amount for the change in the valuation allowance necessary for the deferred tax asset related to nondeductible interest and an amount related to the one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) was issued to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. In accordance with SAB 118, we have determined that the deferred tax expense recorded in connection with the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities and the current tax expense recorded in connection with the transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings are provisional amounts at December 31, 2017.

Additional work is necessary to do a more detailed analysis of historical foreign earnings as well as potential correlative adjustments.

Because we have operations across a number of international regions, we are exposed to currency risk.

A significant portion of our revenues are denominated in foreign currency. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 35% of our revenues were denominated in foreign currencies. In addition, a significant portion of our expenses are incurred in the local currencies of the countries in which we operate, including British Pound, the Euro,

Swedish Krona and the Canadian Dollar.  We have operations in the United States (our headquarters), Europe, the Americas and a number of other foreign countries. For financial reporting purposes, we translate all non-U.S. denominated transactions into U.S. dollars in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We therefore have significant exposure to exchange rate movements between the Pound, Euro, Kroner and Canadian Dollar and other foreign currencies towards the U.S. dollar.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fluctuations in exchange rates also affect the value of funds held by our foreign subsidiaries. Significant inflation or disproportionate changes in foreign exchange rates with respect to one or more of these currencies could occur as a result of general economic conditions, acts of war or terrorism, changes in governmental monetary or tax policy or changes in local interest rates. These exchange rate differences will affect the translation of our non-U.S. results of operations and financial condition into U.S. dollars as part of the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in U.S. GAAP.

U.S. GAAP is subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations, including changes related to revenue recognition, could have a significant effect on our reported financial results, and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.

A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from subscription or recurring revenue streams, and if our existing subscription customers elect not to renew these agreements, renew these agreements for fewer services, or renew these agreements for less expensive services, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

A substantial portion of our solutions are sold pursuant to subscription agreements, and our customers have no obligation to renew these agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2017, subscription or recurring revenue streams represented approximately 83% of our pro forma revenues. We consider services recurrent if customers routinely purchase these services from us pursuant to negotiated “rate card” or similar arrangements, even if we do not have subscription agreements with them. Other companies that also derive revenue from subscription arrangements, including companies in our industry, may not consider revenue derived from “rate cards” or similar arrangements as recurring, and as a result such revenue measures may not be directly comparable to ours. Furthermore, we may not be able to consistently and accurately predict future renewal rates. Our subscription customers’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate or our subscription customers may renew for fewer services or for less expensive services as a result of a number of factors, including their level of satisfaction with our solutions, budgetary or other concerns, and the availability and pricing of competing products. If large numbers of existing subscription customers do not renew these agreements, or renew these agreements on terms less favorable to us, and if we cannot replace or supplement those non-renewals with new subscription agreements generating the same or greater level of revenue, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Because we recognize subscription revenue over the term of the applicable subscription agreement, the lack of subscription renewals or new subscription agreements may not be immediately reflected in our operating results.

We recognize revenue from our subscription customers over the terms of their subscription agreements. A significant portion of our quarterly revenue usually represents deferred revenue from subscription agreements entered into during previous quarters. As a result, a decline in new or renewed subscription agreements in any one quarter will not necessarily be fully reflected in the revenue for the corresponding quarter but will negatively affect our revenue in future quarters.

Additionally, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of our solutions may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods. Our model also makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our subscription based revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new customers must be recognized over the applicable subscription term.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Because our cloud-based platform is sold to enterprises that often have complex operating environments, we may encounter long and unpredictable sales cycles, which could adversely affect our operating results in a given period.

Our ability to increase revenue and achieve profitability depends, in large part, on widespread acceptance of our cloud based platform by enterprises. As we target our sales efforts at these customers, we face greater costs, longer sales cycles and less predictability in completing some of our sales. As a result of the variability and length of the sales cycle,

we have limited ability to forecast the timing of sales. A delay in or failure to complete sales could harm our business and financial results, and could cause our financial results to vary significantly from period to period. Our sales cycle varies widely, reflecting differences in potential customers’ decision-making processes, procurement requirements and budget cycles, and is subject to significant risks over which we have little or no control, including:

Our typical direct sales cycles for more substantial enterprise customers can often be long, and we expect that this lengthy sales cycle may continue or could even increase as our products become more complex and we are asked to tailor our solutions to our enterprise customer needs. Longer sales cycles could cause our operating results and financial condition to suffer in a given period. If we cannot adequately scale our direct sales force, we will experience further delays in signing new customers, which could slow our revenue growth.

The estimates of market opportunity and forecasts of market growth included in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange May prove to be inaccurate, and even if the market in which we compete achieves the forecasted growth, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all.

Market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts included in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates that may not prove to be accurate. Even if the market in which we compete meets the size estimates and growth forecasted in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all.

For more information regarding the estimates of market opportunity and the forecasts of market growth included in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, see the section entitled “Business — Industry.”

Our revenue growth rate in recent periods, which depends in part on the success of our efforts to sell and crosssell additional services to existing customers, may not be indicative of our future performance.

The success of our strategy is dependent, in part, on the success of our efforts to sell and cross-sell additional services, whether internally developed or acquired in an acquisition, to our existing customers. These customers might choose not to expand their use of or make additional purchases of our solutions or may choose to diversify the PR solution providers with which they do business. If we fail to generate additional business from our current customers, our revenue could grow at a slower rate or decrease. Our historical revenue growth rates are not indicative of future growth, and we may not achieve similar revenue growth rates in future periods. You should not rely on our revenue for any prior quarterly or annual periods as an indication of our future revenue or revenue growth. Our operating results may vary as a result of a number of factors, including our ability to execute on our business strategy and compete effectively for customers and business partners and other factors that are outside of our control. If we are unable to maintain consistent revenue or revenue growth, our share price could be volatile, and it could be difficult to achieve or maintain profitability.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A portion of our services is provided on a non-recurring basis for specific projects, and our inability to replace large projects when they are completed or otherwise terminated has adversely affected, and could in the future adversely affect, our revenues and results of operations.

We provide a portion of our services for specific projects that generate revenues that terminate on completion of a defined task. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 3% of our revenue was related to project-based nonrecurring revenue activities. While we seek, wherever possible, on completion or termination of large projects, to counterbalance periodic declines in revenues with new arrangements to provide services to the same customer or others, our inability to obtain sufficient new projects to counterbalance any decreases in such work may adversely affect our future revenues and results of operations.

We depend on search engines to attract new customers and to generate readership for our customers’ online news releases, and if those search engines change their listings or our relationship with them deteriorates or terminates, we may lose customers or be unable to attract new customers and our business and reputation may be harmed.

We rely on search engines to attract new customers, and many of our customers locate our websites by clicking through on search results displayed by search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo!. Search engines typically provide two types of search results, algorithmic and purchased listings. Algorithmic search results are determined and organized solely by automated criteria set by the search engine and a ranking level cannot be purchased. Advertisers can also pay search engines to place listings more prominently in search results in order to attract users to advertisers’ websites. We rely on both algorithmic and purchased listings to attract customers to our websites. Search engines revise their algorithms from time to time in an attempt to optimize their search result listings. If search engines on which we rely for algorithmic listings modify their algorithms, then our websites may not appear at all or may appear less prominently in search results, which could result in fewer customers clicking through to our websites, requiring us to resort to other potentially costly resources to advertise and market our services. If one or more search engines on which we rely for purchased listings modifies or terminates its relationship with us, our expenses could rise, or our revenue could decline and our business may suffer.

Additionally, the cost of purchased search listing advertising is rapidly increasing as demand for these channels grows, and further increases could greatly increase our expenses.

Moreover, our news distribution service depends upon the placement of our customers’ online press releases. If search engines on which we rely modify their algorithms or purposefully block our content, then information distributed via our news distribution service may not be displayed or may be displayed less prominently in search results, and as a result we could lose customers or fail to attract new customers and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

If the delivery of our customers’ emails is limited or blocked, customers may cancel their accounts.

Internet service providers (“ISPs”) can block emails from reaching their users. The implementation of new or more restrictive policies by ISPs may make it more difficult to deliver our customers’ emails. If ISPs materially limit or halt the delivery of our customers’ emails, or if we fail to deliver our customers’ emails in a manner compatible with ISPs’ email handling, authentication technologies or other policies, then customers may cancel their accounts which could harm our business and financial performance.

Various private spam blacklists may interfere with the effectiveness of our products and our ability to conduct business.

We depend on email to market to and communicate with our customers, and our customers rely on email to communicate with journalists, social media influencers, and their customers and members. Various private entities attempt to regulate the use of email for commercial solicitation. These entities often advocate standards of conduct or practice that exceed legal requirements and classify certain email solicitations that comply with legal requirements as spam. Some of these entities maintain “blacklists” of companies and individuals, and the websites, ISPs and Internet protocol addresses associated with those entities or individuals. If a company’s Internet protocol addresses are listed by a blacklisting entity, emails sent from those addresses may be blocked if they are sent to any Internet domain or Internet address that subscribes to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the blacklisting entity’s service or purchases its blacklist. If our services are blacklisted, our customers may be unable to effectively use our services, and as a result we could lose customers or fail to attract new customers and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business relies on our ability to collect, use and leverage personal data and other content. changes in privacy laws, regulations, and standards may interfere with our business.

We are subject to federal, state, and international laws relating to the collection, use, retention, security, and transfer of personal data. Laws and regulations governing the collection, use and disclosure of personal data and use of online analytics and tracking technologies are rapidly evolving globally. As a result, implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. We publicly post documentation regarding our practices concerning the processing, use, and disclosure of data. Any failure by us, our suppliers, or other parties with whom we do business to comply with this documentation or with other federal, state, or foreign regulations could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others. In many jurisdictions, enforcement actions and consequences for noncompliance are rising. In the United States, these include enforcement actions in response to rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of federal agencies and state attorneys general and legislatures and consumer protection agencies. In addition, privacy advocates and industry groups have regularly proposed, and may propose in the future, self-regulatory standards with which we must legally comply or that contractually apply to us, like the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, or PCI DSS. If we fail to follow these security standards, such as those set forth in the PCI DSS, even if no customer information is compromised, we may incur significant fines or experience a significant increase in costs.

Internationally, many jurisdictions in which we operate have established privacy legal framework with which we, our customers or our vendors must comply, including but not limited to the European Union, or EU. The EU’s data protection landscape is currently unstable, resulting in possible significant operational costs for internal compliance and risk to our business. In addition, the EU has adopted the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which is scheduled to go into effect in May 2018 and contains numerous requirements and changes from existing EU law, including more robust obligations on data processors and heavier documentation requirements for data protection compliance programs by companies. Specifically, the GDPR will introduce numerous privacy-related changes for companies operating in the EU, including greater control for data subjects (e.g., the “right to be forgotten”), increased data portability for EU consumers, data breach notification requirements, and increased fines. In particular, under the GDPR, fines of up to 20 million euros or up to 4% of the annual global revenue of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater, could be imposed for violations of certain of the GDPR’s requirements. The GDPR requirements apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between us and our subsidiaries, including employee information.

Changes in these laws and regulations, and self-regulatory frameworks may affect our ability to collect, use and share personal data, and to provide services to customers that rely on our ability to leverage data. Other proposed legislation could, if enacted, prohibit or limit the use of certain technologies that track individuals’ activities on web pages, in emails or on the Internet. In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups and the technology and marketing industries are considering various new, additional or different self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on us or our customers, which could reduce demand for our solutions. As a result of any continuing legislative initiatives and customer demands, we may have to modify our operations to enable us to continue to leverage personal data and other content. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any such modifications may result in increased expenses and operating complexity, and we may be unable to increase the rates we charge for our services sufficiently to offset these increases. Any failure on our part to comply with these laws, regulations and standards can result in negative publicity and diversion of management time and effort and may subject us to significant liabilities and other penalties.

If our solutions fail to perform properly or if they contain technical defects, our reputation would be harmed, our market share would decline and we could be subject to product liability claims.

Our cloud-based software may contain undetected errors or defects that may result in product failures, misleading reports or otherwise cause our solutions to fail to perform in accordance with customer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

expectations. Because our customers use our solutions for important aspects of their business, any errors or defects in, or other performance problems with, our solutions could hurt our reputation and may damage our customers’ businesses. If that occurs, we could lose future sales, our existing subscription customers could elect to not renew or, in certain circumstances, terminate their agreements with us. Product performance problems could result in loss of market share, failure to achieve market acceptance and the diversion of development resources. If one or more of our solutions fail to perform or contain a technical defect, a customer may assert a claim against us for substantial damages, whether or not we are responsible for our solutions’ failure or defect. Product liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or arbitration/dispute resolution or to pay significant settlements or damages.

Our news distribution service is a trusted information source, and our customers rely on our email services to communicate with journalists, social media influencers, and their customers and members. To the extent we were to distribute an inaccurate or fraudulent press release or our customers used our services to transmit negative messages or website links to harmful applications, reproduce and distribute copyrighted and trademarked material without permission,

or report inaccurate or fraudulent data or information, our reputation could be harmed, even though we are not responsible for the content distributed via our services.

We have incurred operating losses in the past and may incur operating losses in the future.

We have incurred operating losses in the past and we may incur operating losses in the future. In 2017, we had operating income of $38.0 million. Prior to 2017, we had operating losses of $19.6 million in 2016 and $27.6 million in 2015. We expect our operating expenses to increase as we continue to expand our operations, and if our increased operating expenses exceed our revenue growth, we may not be able to generate operating income.

Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to reduce future tax payments may be subject to limitations.

As of December 31, 2017, we had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $134.1 million. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire, if not utilized, beginning in 2031. These net operating loss carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. Under the newly enacted federal income tax law, federal net operating losses generated in 2018 and in future years may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal net operating losses is limited. It is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the newly enacted federal tax law. In addition, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period), its ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. If we undergo an ownership change (including as a result of the exchange of Warrants or “new” Warrants for our Ordinary Shares), we may be limited in the portion of net operating loss carryforwards that we can use in the future to offset taxable income for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and the utilization of other tax attributes to reduce our federal and state income tax expense.

If we are required to collect sales and use or other taxes on our solutions, we may be subject to liability for past sales and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Taxing jurisdictions, including state and local entities, have differing rules and regulations governing sales and use or other taxes, and these rules and regulations are subject to varying interpretations that may change over time. In particular, the applicability of sales taxes to our subscription services and e-commerce transactions in general in various jurisdictions is a complex and evolving issue. It is possible that we could face sales tax audits and an assertion that we should be collecting sales or other taxes on our services in jurisdictions where we have not historically done so and do not accrue for sales taxes. The imposition of Internet usage taxes or enhanced enforcement of sales tax laws could result in substantial tax liabilities for past sales or could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our international operations subject us to risks inherent in doing business on an international level, any of which could increase our costs and hinder our growth.

The operations of our non-U.S. business are subject to the risk inherent in international operations. Our expansion into lower cost locations may increase operational risk. Some of these economies may be subject to greater political, economic and social uncertainties than countries with more developed institutional structures. Political, economic or social events or developments in one or more of these countries could adversely affect our operations and financial results.

We operate a global business. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 35% of our revenue was derived from Europe (including the United Kingdom), Canada, Asia and Latin America. We are subject to certain adverse economic factors relating to overseas economies generally, including foreign currency fluctuation, inflation, external debt, a negative balance of trade and underemployment. Risks associated with our international business activities include:

The occurrence of any one of these risks could negatively affect our international operations and, consequently, our results of operations generally.

We are subject to U.S. and certain foreign export and import controls, sanctions, embargoes, anti-corruption laws, and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Compliance with these legal standards could impair our ability to compete in domestic and international markets. We can face criminal liability and other serious consequences for violations which can harm our business.

We are subject to U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations and other restrictions on international trade. As such, we are required to export our technology, products, and services in compliance with those laws and regulations. If we export our technology, products, or services, the exports may require authorizations, including a license, a license exception or other appropriate government authorization. Complying with export control and economic and trade sanctions regulations for a particular transaction may be time-consuming and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. In addition, the United States and other governments and their agencies impose sanctions and embargoes on certain countries, their governments and designated parties, which may prohibit the export of certain technology, products, and services to such persons altogether.

We are also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. §201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, and possibly other state and national anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which we conduct activities. Anti-corruption laws are interpreted broadly and prohibit companies and their employees, third-party intermediaries, and other associated persons from authorizing, promising, offering, providing, soliciting, or accepting directly or indirectly, improper payments or benefits to or from any person whether in the public or private sector. We have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies. We can be held liable for the corrupt or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

other illegal activities of our employees, representatives, contractors, business partners, and agents, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities.

Any violation of the laws and regulations described above may result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties, imprisonment, the loss of export or import privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm, and other consequences.

Our reputation could be damaged or our profitability could suffer if we do not meet the controls and procedures in respect of the services and solutions we provide to our customers, or if we contribute to our customers’ internal control deficiencies.

Our customers may perform audits or require us to perform audits, provide audit reports or obtain certifications with respect to the controls and procedures that we use in the performance of services for such customers, especially when we process data or information belonging to them. Our ability to acquire new customers and retain existing customers may be adversely affected and our reputation could be harmed if we cannot obtain an appropriate certification or opinion with respect to our controls and procedures in connection with any such audit in a timely manner. Additionally, our profitability could suffer if our controls and procedures were to fail or to impair our customers’ ability to comply with their own internal control requirements.

We may dispose of or discontinue existing products and services, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We continually evaluate our various products and services in order to determine whether any should be discontinued or, to the extent possible, divested. We cannot guarantee that we have correctly forecasted, or will correctly forecast in the future, the right products or services to dispose of or discontinue, or that our decision to dispose of or discontinue various investments, products or services is prudent. There are no assurances that the discontinuance of various products or services will reduce our operating expenses or will not cause us to incur material charges with such a decision. The disposal or discontinuance of existing solutions presents various risks, including, but not limited to the inability to find a purchaser for a product or service or the purchase price obtained will not be equal to at least the book value of the net assets for the product or service, managing the expectations of, and maintaining good relations with, our customers who previously purchased discontinued solutions, which could prevent us from selling other products to them in the future. We may also incur other significant liabilities and costs associated with our disposal or discontinuance of solutions, including, but not limited to employee severance costs and excess facilities costs, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The loss of key personnel or of our ability to attract, recruit, retain and develop qualified employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends upon the continued services of our senior management and other key personnel who have substantial experience in the PR software and services industry and the markets in which we offer our services. In addition, our success depends in large part upon the reputation within the industry of our senior managers. Further, in order for us to continue to successfully compete and grow, we must attract, recruit, develop and retain personnel, including key executives of organizations we acquire, who will provide us with expertise across the entire spectrum of our intellectual capital needs. Our success also depends on the skill and experience of our sales force, which we must continuously work to maintain. While we have a number of key personnel who have substantial experience with our operations, we must also develop our personnel to provide succession plans capable of maintaining the continuity of our operations. The market for qualified personnel is competitive, and we may not succeed in recruiting additional personnel or may fail to effectively replace current personnel who depart with qualified or effective successors.

Failure to retain or attract key personnel could impede our ability to grow and could result in our inability to operate our business profitably. In addition, contractual obligations related to confidentiality, assignment of intellectual property rights, and non-solicitation may be ineffective or unenforceable and departing employees may share our proprietary information with competitors in ways that could adversely impact us, or seek to solicit customers or recruit our key personnel to competing businesses.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Labor disruptions could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 3,500 global employees, with approximately 1,400 employees located in the United States and 2,100 employees located internationally. In various countries, local law requires our participation in works councils, and we have approximately 500 employees working under collective bargaining agreements. While we have not experienced any material work stoppages at any of our facilities, any stoppage or slowdown could cause material interruptions in our business, and we cannot assure you that alternate qualified personnel would be available on a timely basis, or at all. As a result, labor disruptions at any of our locations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Natural disasters and other events beyond our control could adversely affect us.

Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may cause damage or disruption to our operations, our servers and data centers and the global economy, and thus could have a strong negative effect on us. Our business operations and our servers and data centers are subject to interruption by natural disasters, fire, power shortages, pandemics and other events beyond our control. Although we maintain crisis management and disaster response plans, such events could make it difficult or impossible for us to continue operations, and could decrease demand for our platform. Our primary data centers are located in Chicago, IL, Sterling, VA, Piscataway, NJ, Raleigh, NC, Paris, France and London, UK, making our business particularly susceptible to natural disasters in those areas as well as in areas where our third-party data centers are located. Any natural disaster affecting our data centers could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

Political uncertainty, political unrest or terrorism could adversely affect business conditions in those regions, which in turn could disrupt our business and adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

We conduct business in countries and regions that are vulnerable to disruptions from political uncertainty, political unrest or terrorist acts. Any damage or disruption from political uncertainty, political unrest or terrorist acts would damage our ability to provide services, in whole or in part, and/or otherwise damage our operations and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Further, political tensions and escalation of hostilities could adversely affect our operations in these countries and therefore adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war could affect us or our clients by disrupting normal business practices for extended periods of time and reducing business confidence. In addition, acts of violence or war may make travel more difficult and may effectively curtail our ability to serve our clients’ needs, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Trends in print news and media readership could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

The volume of content from print news sources has declined in recent years, which has reduced the volume of print news stories delivered through our content offerings. This has largely been driven by a decline in print media readership which has in turn seen a reduction in media publisher revenue and journalist numbers associated with media such as print newspapers. If the volume of content continues to decline (e.g., because of further reductions in journalist numbers by print media publishers), and if we are unable to offset this decline with our current and/or future other software and services, our future financial performance could be adversely affected.

The development of self-service media intelligence offerings and related technology could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The proliferation of digital, free-to-access news content has led to the introduction of low-cost or free self-service media intelligence offerings. Moreover, our insights group provides human-generated media intelligence analysis and consultation to some of our larger customers. More efficient or cost-effective

TABLE OF CONTENTS

technology that replaces the need for such human-generated analysis could have an adverse effect on our business. Our future financial performance could be affected by customers adopting these low-cost, self-service media intelligence platforms and technologies.

Decisions to declare future dividends on our Ordinary Shares will be at the discretion of our board of directors based upon a review of relevant considerations. Accordingly, there can be no guarantee that we will pay future dividends to our shareholders.

Future declarations of quarterly dividends and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to approval by the board of directors and subject to certain limitations set forth in the agreements governing our credit facilities. The board’s determination to declare dividends will depend upon our profitability and financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors that the board deems relevant. Based on an evaluation of these factors, the board of directors may determine not to declare future dividends at all or to declare future dividends at a reduced amount. Accordingly, there can be no guarantee that we will pay future dividends to our shareholders.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests as a shareholder, as Cayman Islands law provides substantially less protection when compared to the laws of the United States.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association and by the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands (2018 Revision) (the “Companies Law”) and common law of the Cayman Islands.

The rights of shareholders to take legal action against our directors and us, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands have a less exhaustive body of securities laws as compared to the United States.

In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action before the United States federal courts. As a result, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests through actions against us or our officers, directors or major shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are a Cayman Islands company and a portion our assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. It may not be possible to enforce certain court judgments obtained in the United States against us (or our directors or officers) in the Cayman Islands. We have been advised that there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in United States courts, and such matters are governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. Uncertainty exists as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands would:

We have been advised that the uncertainty with regard to Cayman Islands law relates to whether a judgment obtained from the United States courts under civil liability provisions of the securities laws will be determined by the courts of the Cayman Islands as penal or punitive in nature. If such a determination is made, the courts of the Cayman Islands will not recognize or enforce the judgment against a Cayman Islands company. Because the courts of the Cayman Islands have yet to rule on whether such judgments are penal or punitive in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

nature, it is uncertain whether they would be enforceable in the Cayman Islands. We are further advised us that a final and conclusive judgment in the federal or state courts of the United States under which a sum of money is payable, other than a sum payable in respect of taxes, fines, penalties or similar charges, will ordinarily be recognized and enforced in the courts of the Cayman Islands without re-examination of the merits, at common law.

Our business may be adversely affected by third-party claims, including by governmental bodies, regarding the content and advertising distributed through our service.

We rely on our customers to secure the rights to redistribute content over the Internet, and we do not screen the content that is distributed through our service. There is no assurance that our customers have licensed all rights necessary for distribution, including Internet distribution. Other parties may claim certain rights in the content of our customers. In the event that our customers do not have the necessary distribution rights related to content or otherwise distribute illegal content, although we have made efforts to limit our liability we may be required to cease distributing such content or subject to lawsuits and claims of damages for infringement of such rights. Any claims or investigations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related To Our Finances and Capital Structure

We have and will continue to have high levels of indebtedness.

As of March 31, 2018, we had no outstanding borrowings and $1.1 million of outstanding letters of credit under our current revolving credit facility (the “2017 Revolving Credit Facility”) and $1,336 million outstanding under our first lien term loan facility (the “2017 First Lien Term Credit Facility” and together with the 2017 Revolving Credit Facility, the “2017 First Lien Credit Facility”). Because borrowings under our 2017 Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates, any increase in interest rates on debt that we have not fixed using interest rate hedges will increase our interest expense, reduce our cash flow or increase the cost of future borrowings or refinancings. Our indebtedness could have important consequences to our investors, including, but not limited to:

Other than variable rate debt, we believe our business has relatively large fixed costs and low variable costs, which magnifies the impact of revenue fluctuations on our operating results. As a result, a decline in our revenue may lead to a relatively larger impact on operating results. A substantial portion of our operating expenses will be related to personnel costs, regulation and corporate overhead, none of which can be adjusted quickly and some of which cannot be adjusted at all. Our operating expense levels will be based on our expectations for future revenue. If actual revenue is below management’s expectations, or if our expenses increase before revenues do, both revenues less transaction-based expenses and operating results would be materially and adversely affected. Because of these factors, it is possible that our operating results or other operating metrics may fail to meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors. If this happens, the market price of our Ordinary Shares may be adversely affected.

The credit agreement in respect of our 2017 first lien credit facility contains a change of control provision that could require us to amend or refinance our indebtedness.

The credit agreement in respect of our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility provides that an event of default will occur upon specified change of control events, which include Cision ceasing to beneficially own directly or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

indirectly all of the voting equity interests of certain credit parties thereunder. In addition, a change of control event occurs if any person or group beneficially owns directly or indirectly a majority of our voting equity interests (other than the Sponsor and certain other specified persons). Although we do not currently anticipate that any such person will beneficially own a majority of the Ordinary Shares prior to our amendment or refinancing of this indebtedness, no person is contractually obligated to retain the Ordinary Shares it holds. If we are unable to amend these agreements or refinance this indebtedness, we will be limited in our ability to issue additional equity to any person which would acquire a majority of Ordinary Shares following such issuance and will need to rely on other sources of financing, including additional borrowings.

Our ability to pay dividends in the future will be subject to our subsidiaries’ ability to distribute cash to us.

We do not anticipate that our board of directors will declare dividends in the foreseeable future. If we decide to declare dividends in the future, as a holding company, we will require dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries to meet such cash requirements. Our credit agreements place certain contractual restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions to us. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Overview” for a discussion of our credit facilities’ restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions to us. In addition, minimum capital requirements may indirectly restrict the amount of dividends paid upstream, and repatriations of cash from our subsidiaries may be subject to withholding, income and other taxes in various applicable jurisdictions. If our subsidiaries are unable to distribute cash to us and we are unable to pay dividends, our Ordinary Shares may become less attractive to investors and the price of our Ordinary Shares may become volatile.

Future changes to tax laws could adversely affect us.

The U.S. government, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and other governmental agencies in jurisdictions where we do business have had an extended focus on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations. One example is in the area of “base erosion and profit shifting,” where payments are made between affiliates from a jurisdiction with high tax rates to a jurisdiction with lower tax rates. As a result, the tax laws in the countries in which we do business could change on a prospective or retroactive basis, and any such changes could adversely affect us.

The withdrawal of the U.K. from the European Union (commonly referred to as Brexit) may cause an increase in our taxes including withholding taxes on repatriation of cash from jurisdictions that are members of the European Union to or through any of our U.K. subsidiaries as a result of the U.K. no longer being entitled to benefits provided by the European Union directives.

The so called “anti-inversion” rules under U.S. federal tax law may impose adverse consequences or apply limitations on our ability to engage in future acquisitions.

Under Section 7874 of the Code, if, following an acquisition of a U.S. corporation by a foreign corporation, at least 80% of the acquiring foreign corporation’s stock by (vote and value) is considered to be held by former shareholders of the U.S. corporation by reason of holding stock of such U.S. corporation then the acquiring corporation could be treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes even though it is a corporation created and organized outside the United States.

In addition, following the acquisition of a U.S. corporation by a foreign corporation, Section 7874 of the Code can limit the ability of the acquired U.S. corporation and its U.S. affiliates to utilize U.S. tax attributes (including net operating losses and certain tax credits) to offset U.S. taxable income resulting from certain transactions if the shareholders of the acquired U.S. corporation hold at least 60% (but less than 80%), by either vote or value, of the shares of the foreign acquiring corporation by reason of holding shares in the U.S. corporation, and certain other conditions are met. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act introduced an additional minimum tax under Section 59A of the Code imposed on certain “base eroding” payments that reduce gross receipts made to a “surrogate foreign corporation” under Section 7874 of the Code.

Because Cision is a non-U.S. corporation, Section 7874 of the Code and the regulations thereunder may apply with respect to potential future acquisitions of U.S. corporations by Cision. As a result, these rules may impose adverse consequences or apply limitations on our ability to engage in future acquisitions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If we are characterized as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our U.S. shareholders may suffer adverse tax consequences.

If 75% or more of our gross income in a taxable year, including our pro-rata share of the gross income of any company, U.S. or foreign, in which we are considered to own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the shares by value, is passive income, then we will be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Alternatively, we will be considered to be a PFIC if at least 50% of our assets in a taxable year, averaged over the year and ordinarily determined based on fair market value and including our pro-rata share of the assets of any company in which we are considered to own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the shares by value, are held for the production of, or produce, passive income. Once treated as a PFIC, for any taxable year, a foreign corporation will generally continue to be treated as a PFIC for all subsequent taxable years for any shareholder who owned shares of the foreign corporation when it was treated as a PFIC. If we were to be a PFIC, and a U.S. holder does not make an election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, or a “mark-to-market” election, “excess distributions” to a U.S. holder, and any gain recognized by a U.S. holder on a disposition of our Ordinary Shares, would be taxed in an unfavorable way.

Among other consequences, our dividends, to the extent that they constituted excess distributions, would be taxed at the regular rates applicable to ordinary income, rather than the 20% maximum rate applicable to certain dividends received by an individual from a qualified foreign corporation, and certain “interest” charges may apply. In addition, gains on the sale of our Ordinary Shares would be treated in the same way as excess distributions.

The tests for determining PFIC status are applied annually and it is difficult to make accurate predictions of future income and assets, which are relevant to the determination of PFIC status. In addition, under the applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, it is unclear whether we would be permitted to use a gross loss from sales (sales less cost of goods sold) to offset our passive income in the calculation of gross income. Although we do not expect that we will be a PFIC in the future, in light of the periodic asset and income tests applicable in making this determination, no assurance can be given that we will not become a PFIC. If we do become a PFIC in the future, U.S. holders who hold Ordinary Shares during any period when we are a PFIC will be subject to the foregoing rules, even if we cease to be a PFIC, subject to exceptions for U.S. holders who made a timely QEF or mark-to-market election, or certain other elections. We do not currently intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable our shareholders to make a QEF election.

Accordingly, our shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules.

We incur increased costs and obligations as a result of being a public company.

As a privately held company, we were not required to comply with certain corporate governance and financial reporting practices and policies required of a publicly traded company. As a publicly traded company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we were not required to incur in the recent past, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, as amended (the “JOBS Act”). In addition, new and changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, as well as under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the JOBS Act, and the rules and regulations of the SEC and national securities exchanges have created uncertainty for public companies and increased the costs and the time that our board of directors and management must devote to complying with these rules and regulations. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and lead to a diversion of management time and attention from revenue generating activities.

Furthermore, the maintenance of the corporate infrastructure demanded of a public company may divert management’s attention from implementing our growth strategy, which could prevent us from improving our business, results of operations and financial condition. As of March 31, 2018, our management has concluded that we did not maintain effective controls over the preparation and review of the income tax provision and related current and deferred income tax accounts. Specifically, a material weakness in the design of our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

controls did not ensure that the information used to prepare the income tax provision and related current and deferred income tax accounts was complete and accurate. For more information about this material weakness, see the section entitled “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Material weakness and remediation.” We have made, and will continue to make, enhancements to our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and accounting systems to meet our reporting obligations as a publicly traded company. However, the measures we take may not be sufficient to satisfy our obligations as a publicly traded company.

For as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.” We may remain an “emerging growth company” until October 19, 2020 (the fifth anniversary of the consummation of our predecessor’s initial public offering) or until such earlier time that we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenues, have more than $700.0 million in market value of our Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates, or issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt securities over a three-year period. Further, there is no guarantee that the exemptions available to us under the JOBS Act will result in significant savings. To the extent we choose not to use exemptions from various reporting requirements under the JOBS Act, we will incur additional compliance costs, which may impact earnings.

As an “emerging growth company,” we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to “emerging growth companies” will make our Ordinary Shares less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to obtain an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting from our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of these accounting standards until they would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of such extended transition period.

We cannot predict if investors will find our Ordinary Shares less attractive because we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Ordinary Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active market for our Ordinary Shares and our share price may be more volatile.

If we do not develop and implement all required accounting practices and policies, we may be unable to provide the financial information required of a U.S. publicly traded company in a timely and reliable manner.

If we fail to maintain effective internal controls and procedures and disclosure procedures and controls, we may be unable to provide financial information and required SEC reports that a U.S. publicly traded company is required to provide in a timely and reliable fashion. Any such delays or deficiencies could penalize us, including by limiting our ability to obtain financing, either in the public capital markets or from private sources and hurt our reputation and could thereby impede our ability to implement our growth strategy. In addition, any such delays or deficiencies could result in our failure to meet the requirements for listing of our Ordinary Shares on a national securities exchange.

The price of our Ordinary Shares may be volatile.

The price of our Ordinary Shares may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, including:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

These market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our Ordinary Shares, regardless of our operating performance.

Reports published by analysts, including projections in those reports that differ from our actual results, could adversely affect the price and trading volume of our Ordinary Shares.

We currently expect that securities research analysts will establish and publish their own periodic projections for our business. These projections may vary widely and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our share price may decline if our actual results do not match the projections of these securities research analysts. Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who write reports on us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our share price or trading volume could decline. While we expect research analyst coverage, if no analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price and volume for our Ordinary Shares could be adversely affected.

We may redeem your unexpired Warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your Warrants worthless.

We have the ability to redeem outstanding Warrants (other than the private Warrants) at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at $0.01 per warrant, if the last reported sales price (or the closing bid price of our Ordinary Shares in the event the Ordinary Shares are not traded on any specific trading day) of the Ordinary Shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third business day prior to the date we send proper notice of such redemption, provided that on the date we give notice of redemption and during the entire period thereafter until the time we redeem the Warrants, we have an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available. If and when the Warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding Warrants could force a warrant holder: (i) to exercise Warrants and pay the exercise price therefore at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) to sell Warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your Warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding Warrants are called for redemption, will be substantially less than the market value of your Warrants.

We may issue additional Ordinary Shares or other equity securities without your approval, which would dilute your ownership interests and may depress the market price of Cision’s ordinary shares.

We may issue an aggregate of 6,000,000 Ordinary Shares to Cision Owner upon achievement of milestone targets, of which 2,000,000 of such shares were issued to Cision Owner on November 3, 2017. Our issuance of additional Ordinary Shares or other equity securities of equal or senior rank would have the following effects:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association contain anti-takeover provisions that could adversely affect the rights of our shareholders.

Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions, including, among other things:

These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction. With our staggered board of directors, at least two annual meetings of shareholders will generally be required in order to effect a change in a majority of our directors. Our staggered board of directors can discourage proxy contests for the election of our directors and purchases of substantial blocks of our shares by making it more difficult for a potential acquirer to gain control of our board of directors in a relatively short period of time.

Risks Related to Our Warrants and the Offer to Exchange and Consent Solicitation

The Warrant Amendment, if approved, will allow us to require that all outstanding Warrants be exchanged for Ordinary Shares at a ratio 10% lower than the ratio applicable to the Offer.

If we complete the Offer and Consent Solicitation and obtain the requisite approval of the Warrant Amendment by holders of the Warrants, the Company will have the right to require holders of all Warrants that remain outstanding after the expiration of the Offer to exchange each of their Warrants for 0.234 Ordinary Shares. This represents a ratio of Ordinary Shares per Warrant that is 10% less than the ratio applicable to the Offer. Although we intend to require an exchange of all remaining outstanding Warrants as a result of the approval of the Warrant Amendment, we would not be required to effect such an exchange and may defer doing so, if ever, until most economically advantageous to us.

Pursuant to the terms of the Warrant Agreement, the consent of holders of at least the majority of the outstanding Warrants is required to approve the Warrant Amendment. Therefore, one of the conditions to the adoption of the Warrant Amendment is the receipt of the consent of holders of at least the majority of the outstanding Warrants. The Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner have advised us that they intend to tender all of the Private Warrants held by them in the Offer; however, none of these parties are under any contractual obligation to tender such Warrants, and there can be no assurance that they will do so. Collectively, the Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner hold approximately 94.5% of the Private Warrants, representing approximately 31.8% of the total Warrants outstanding. If the Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner tender all of the Private Warrants held by them in the Offer and the holders of approximately 26.7% of the remaining outstanding Warrants agree to tender (and the other conditions described herein are satisfied) then the Warrant

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Amendment will be adopted. See the section of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange entitled “The Offer and Consent Solicitation — Transactions and Agreements Concerning Our Securities.” If adopted, we currently intend to require the conversion of all outstanding Warrants to Ordinary Shares as provided in the Warrant Amendment, which would result in the holders of any remaining outstanding Warrants receiving approximately 10% fewer shares than if they had tendered their Warrants in the Offer.

Our Warrants may be exchanged for Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Offer, which will increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our shareholders.

The exchange of the Warrants will result in the issuance of additional Ordinary Shares, although there can be no assurance that such warrant exchange will be completed or that all of the holders of the Warrants will elect to participate in the Offer. Any Warrants remaining outstanding after the exchange likely will be exercised only if the $11.50 per share exercise price is below the market price of our Ordinary Shares. We also intend to require an exchange of all remaining outstanding Warrants assuming the approval of the Warrant Amendment. To the extent such Warrants are exchanged following the approval of the Warrant Amendment or exercised, additional Ordinary Shares will be issued. These issuances of Ordinary Shares will result in dilution to our shareholders and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market.

We have not obtained a third-party determination that the Offer or the Consent Solicitation is fair to Warrant holders.

None of us, our affiliates, the dealer managers, the exchange agent or the information agent makes any recommendation as to whether you should exchange some or all of your Warrants or consent to the Warrant Amendment. We have not retained, and do not intend to retain, any unaffiliated representative to act on behalf of the Warrant holders for purposes of negotiating the Offer or Consent Solicitation or preparing a report concerning the fairness of the Offer or the Consent Solicitation. You must make your own independent decision regarding your participation in the Offer and the Consent Solicitation.

There is no guarantee that tendering your Warrants in the offer will put you in a better future economic position.

We can give no assurance as to the market price of our Ordinary Shares in the future. If you choose to tender some or all of your Warrants in the Offer, future events may cause an increase in the market price of our Ordinary Shares and Warrants, which may result in a lower value realized by participating in the Offer than you might have realized if you did not exchange your Warrants. Similarly, if you do not tender your Warrants in the Offer, there can be no assurance that you can sell your Warrants (or exercise them for Ordinary Shares) in the future at a higher value than would have been obtained by participating in the Offer. In addition, if the Warrant Amendment is adopted, you may receive fewer shares than if you had tendered your Warrants in the Offer. See “— The Warrant Amendment, if approved, will allow us to require that all outstanding Warrants be exchanged for Ordinary Shares.” You should consult your own individual tax and/or financial advisor for assistance on how this may affect your individual situation.

The number of Ordinary Shares offered in the Offer is fixed and will not be adjusted. The market price of our Ordinary Shares may fluctuate, and the market price of the Ordinary Shares when we deliver the Ordinary Shares in exchange for your Warrants could be less than the market price at the time you tender your Warrants.

The number of Ordinary Shares for each Warrant accepted for exchange is fixed at the number of shares specified on the cover of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and will fluctuate in value if there is any increase or decrease in the market price of our Ordinary Shares or the Warrants after the date of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. Therefore, the market price of the Ordinary Shares when we deliver Ordinary Shares in exchange for your Warrants could be less than the market price at the time you tender your Warrants. The market price of our Ordinary Shares could continue to fluctuate and be subject to volatility during the period of time between when we accept Warrants for exchange in the Offer and when we deliver Ordinary Shares in exchange for Warrants, or during any extension of the Offer Period.

The liquidity of the Warrants that are not exchanged may be reduced.

It is unlikely that any Warrants will remain outstanding following the completion of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. See “— The Warrant Amendment, if approved, will allow us to require that all outstanding

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Warrants be exchanged for Ordinary Shares at a ratio 10% lower than the ratio applicable to the Offer.” However, if any unexchanged Warrants remain outstanding, then the ability to sell such Warrants may become more limited due to the reduction in the number of Warrants outstanding upon completion of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. A more limited trading market might adversely affect the liquidity, market price and price volatility of unexchanged Warrants. In addition, as discussed below, our Public Warrants may be removed from quotation on NYSE American. As a result, investors in our Public Warrants may find it more difficult to dispose of or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our Warrants, and the ability of our shareholders to sell our Public Warrants in the secondary market may be materially limited. If there continues to be a market for our unexchanged Warrants, these securities may trade at a discount to the price at which the securities would trade if the number outstanding were not reduced, depending on the market for similar securities and other factors.

NYSE American may delist our Public Warrants from trading on its exchange, which could limit Public Warrant holders’ ability to make transactions in our Public Warrants.

It is unlikely that any Warrants will remain outstanding following the completion of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. See “— The Warrant Amendment, if approved, will allow us to require that all outstanding Warrants be exchanged for Ordinary Shares at a ratio that is 10% lower than the ratio applicable to the Offer.” However, if any unexchanged Warrants remain outstanding following the completion of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, we cannot assure you that our Public Warrants will continue to be listed on NYSE American in the future. The NYSE may consider delisting the Public Warrants if it determines that the extent of public distribution or aggregate market value of the outstanding Warrants has become so reduced as to make further listing inadvisable, or if it otherwise determines continued listing is unwarranted.

If NYSE delists our Public Warrants from trading on NYSE American and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, our Public Warrants could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. However, even if this were to occur, holders of Public Warrants could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE OFFER AND CONSENT SOLICITATION

Participation in the Offer and Consent Solicitation involves a number of risks, including, but not limited to, the risks identified in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” Warrant holders should carefully consider these risks and are urged to speak with their personal legal, financial, investment and/or tax advisor as necessary before deciding whether or not to participate in the Offer and Consent Solicitation. In addition, we strongly encourage you to read this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange in its entirety, and the publicly-filed information about us, before making a decision regarding the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

General Terms

Until the Expiration Date, we are offering to holders of our Warrants the opportunity to receive 0.26 Ordinary Shares in exchange for each Warrant they hold. Holders of the Warrants tendered for exchange will not have to pay any of the exercise price for the tendered Warrants in order to receive Ordinary Shares in the exchange. Our obligation to complete the Offer is not conditioned on the receipt of a minimum number of tendered Warrants.

No fractional shares will be issued pursuant to the Offer. In lieu of issuing fractional shares, any holder of Warrants who would otherwise have been entitled to receive fractional shares pursuant to the Offer will, after aggregating all such fractional shares of such holder, be paid cash (without interest) in an amount equal to such fractional part of a share multiplied by the last sale price of our Ordinary Shares on the NYSE on the last trading day of the Offer Period.

As part of the Offer, we are also soliciting from the holders of the Warrants their consent to the amendment of the Warrant Agreement. If approved, the Warrant Amendment would permit the Company to require that all outstanding Warrants be converted into Ordinary Shares at a ratio of 0.234 Ordinary Shares per Warrant, which is a ratio 10% less than the ratio applicable to the Offer, which would permit us to eliminate all of the Warrants that remain outstanding after the Offer expires. A copy of the Warrant Amendment is attached hereto as Annex A. We urge that you carefully read the Warrant Amendment in its entirety. Pursuant to the terms of the Warrant Agreement, the consent of holders of at least a majority of the outstanding Warrants is required to approve the Warrant Amendment.

Holders who tender Warrants in the Offer will automatically be deemed, without any further action, to have given their consent to approval of the Warrant Amendment (effective upon our acceptance of the Warrants tendered). The consent to the Warrant Amendment is a part of the Letter of Transmittal and Consent relating to the Warrants.

You cannot tender any Warrants in the Offer without giving your consent to the Warrant Amendment. Thus, before deciding whether to tender any Warrants, you should be aware that a tender of Warrants may result in the approval of the Warrant Amendment.

The Offer and Consent Solicitation is subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and the Letter of Transmittal and Consent.

You may tender some or all of your Warrants into the Offer. If you elect to tender Warrants in response to the Offer and Consent Solicitation, please follow the instructions in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and the related documents, including the Letter of Transmittal and Consent.

If you tender Warrants, you may withdraw your tendered Warrants at any time before the Expiration Date and retain them on their current terms or amended terms if the Warrant Amendment is approved, by following the instructions herein. In addition, Warrants that are not accepted by us for exchange by June 12, 2018 may thereafter be withdrawn by you until such time as the Warrants are accepted by us for exchange.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in the Cayman Islands on March 9, 2017 in order to become the parent company of Canyon Holdings S.à r.l. in connection with the Business Combination with Capitol. On June 29, 2017, we consummated the Business Combination and, in connection therewith, became a successor issuer to Capitol by operation of Rule 12g-3(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our principal executive offices are located at 130 E. Randolph Street, 7^th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601, and our telephone number is (312) 922-2400. Our website address is www.cision.com. We had approximately 3,500 employees as of December 31, 2017. Information contained on our website is not a part of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. Our Ordinary Shares are listed on NYSE under the symbol “Cision,” and our Public Warrants are listed on NYSE American under the symbol “CISN.WS.”

Warrants Subject to the Offer

The Public Warrants were issued in connection with the Capitol IPO and automatically converted into warrants to acquire Ordinary Shares of Cision upon the consummation of the Business Combination. Each Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Ordinary Share for a purchase price of $11.50, subject to adjustments pursuant to the Warrant Agreement. The Public Warrants are listed on NYSE American under the symbol “CISN.WS.” As of May 8, 2018, 16,250,000 Public Warrants were outstanding. Pursuant to the Offer, we are offering up to an aggregate of 4,225,000 of our Ordinary Shares in exchange for the Public Warrants.

The Private Warrants were issued to the Capitol Sponsors in connection with the Capitol IPO and additional Private Warrants were issued to Cision Owner in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination. Each Private Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Ordinary Share for a purchase price of $11.50, subject to adjustments pursuant to the Warrant Agreement. As of May 8, 2018, 8,250,000 Private Warrants were outstanding. Pursuant to the Offer, we are offering up to an aggregate of 2,145,000 of our Ordinary Shares in exchange for the Private Warrants.

The terms of the Private Warrants are identical to the Public Warrants, except that such Private Warrants are exercisable on a cashless basis and are not redeemable by us, in each case so long as they are still held by the initial holders or their affiliates.

Offer Period

The Offer and Consent Solicitation will expire on the Expiration Date, which is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 15, 2018, or such later time and date to which we may extend. We expressly reserve the right, in our sole discretion, at any time or from time to time, to extend the period of time during which the Offer and Consent Solicitation is open. There can be no assurance that we will exercise our right to extend the Offer Period. During any extension, all Warrant holders who previously tendered Warrants will have a right to withdraw such previously tendered Warrants until the Expiration Date, as extended. If we extend the Offer Period, we will make a public announcement of such extension by no later than 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on the next business day following the Expiration Date as in effect immediately prior to such extension.

We may withdraw the Offer and Consent Solicitation only if the conditions to the Offer and Consent Solicitation are not satisfied or waived prior to the Expiration Date. Upon any such withdrawal, we are required by Rule 13e-4(f)(5) under the Exchange Act to promptly return the tendered Warrants. We will announce our decision to withdraw the Offer and Consent Solicitation by disseminating notice by public announcement or otherwise as permitted by applicable law.

At the expiration of the Offer Period, the current terms of the Warrants will continue to apply to any unexchanged Warrants, or the amended terms if the Warrant Amendment is approved, until the Warrants expire by their terms on June 29, 2023.

Amendments to the Offer and Consent Solicitation

We reserve the right at any time or from time to time, to amend the Offer and Consent Solicitation, including by increasing or (if the conditions to the Offer are not satisfied) decreasing the exchange ratio of Ordinary Shares issued for every Warrant exchanged or by changing the terms of the Warrant Amendment.

If we make a material change in the terms of the Offer and Consent Solicitation or the information concerning the Offer and Consent Solicitation, or if we waive a material condition of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, we will extend the Offer and Consent Solicitation to the extent required by Rules 13e-4(d)(2) and 13e-4(e)(3) under the Exchange Act. These rules require that the minimum period during which an offer must remain open after material changes in the terms of the offer or information concerning the offer, other than a change in price or a change in percentage of securities sought, will depend upon the facts and circumstances, including the relative materiality of the changed terms or information.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If we increase or decrease the exchange ratio of the Ordinary Shares issuable upon exchange of a Warrant, the amount of Warrants sought for tender or the dealer manager’s soliciting fee, and the Offer and Consent Solicitation is scheduled to expire at any time earlier than the end of the tenth business day from the date that we first publish, send or give notice of such an increase or decrease, then we will extend the Offer and Consent Solicitation until the expiration of that ten business day period.

Other material amendments to the Offer and Consent Solicitation may require us to extend the Offer and Consent Solicitation for a minimum of five business days, and we will need to amend this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of which this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange forms a part for any material changes in the facts set forth in this Registration Statement on Form S-4.

Partial Exchange Permitted

Our obligation to complete the Offer is not conditioned on the receipt of a minimum number of tendered Warrants. If you choose to participate in the Offer, you may tender less than all of your Warrants pursuant to the terms of the Offer. No fractional shares will be issued pursuant to the Offer. In lieu of issuing fractional shares, any holder of Warrants who would otherwise have been entitled to receive fractional shares pursuant to the Offer will, after aggregating all such fractional shares of such holder, be paid cash (without interest) in an amount equal to such fractional part of a share multiplied by the last sale price of our Ordinary Shares on the NYSE on the last trading day of the Offer Period.

Conditions to the Offer and Consent Solicitation

The Offer and Consent Solicitation are conditioned upon the following:

The Consent Solicitation is conditioned on our receiving the consent of holders of at least a majority of the outstanding Warrants (which is the minimum number required to amend the Warrant Agreement).

We will not complete the Offer and Consent Solicitation unless and until the registration statement described above is declared effective by the SEC. If the registration statement is not effective at the Expiration Date, we may, in our discretion, extend, suspend or cancel the Offer and Consent Solicitation, and will inform Warrant holders of such event. If we extend the Offer Period, we will make a public announcement of such extension

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and the new Expiration Date by no later than 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on the next business day following the Expiration Date as in effect immediately prior to such extension.

In addition, as to any Warrant holder, the Offer and Consent Solicitation is conditioned upon such Warrant holder desiring to tender Warrants in the Offer delivering to the exchange agent in a timely manner the holder’s Warrants to be tendered and any other required paperwork, all in accordance with the applicable procedures described in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and set forth in the Letter of Transmittal and Consent.

The foregoing conditions are solely for our benefit, and we may assert one or more of the conditions regardless of the circumstances giving rise to any such conditions. We may also, in our sole and absolute discretion, waive these conditions in whole or in part, subject to the potential requirement to disseminate additional information and extend the Offer Period. The determination by us as to whether any condition has been satisfied shall be conclusive and binding on all parties. The failure by us at any time to exercise any of the foregoing rights shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right, and each such right shall be deemed a continuing right which may be asserted at any time and from time to time prior to the Expiration Date.

We may withdraw the Offer and Consent Solicitation only if the conditions of the Offer and Consent Solicitation are not satisfied or waived prior to the Expiration Date. Promptly upon any such withdrawal, we will return the tendered Warrants (and the related consent to the Warrant Amendment will be revoked). We will announce our decision to withdraw the Offer and Consent Solicitation by disseminating notice by public announcement or otherwise as permitted by applicable law.

No Recommendation; Warrant Holder’s Own Decision

None of Cision, our affiliates, directors, officers or employees, or the information agent, the exchange agent or the dealer manager for the Offer and Consent Solicitation, is making any recommendations to any Warrant holder as to whether to exchange their Warrants and deliver their consent to the Warrant Amendment. Each Warrant holder must make its own decision as to whether to tender Warrants for exchange pursuant to the Offer and consent to the amendment of the Warrant Agreement pursuant to the Consent Solicitation.

Procedure for Tendering Warrants for Exchange and Consenting to the Warrant Amendment

Issuance of Ordinary Shares upon exchange of Warrants pursuant to the Offer and acceptance by us of Warrants for exchange pursuant to the Offer and providing your consent to the Warrant Amendment will be made only if Warrants are properly tendered pursuant to the procedures described below and set forth in the Letter of Transmittal and Consent. A tender of Warrants pursuant to such procedures, if and when accepted by us, will constitute a binding agreement between the tendering holder of Warrants and us upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. The proper tender of your Warrants will constitute a consent to the Warrant Amendment with respect to each Warrant tendered.

A tender of Warrants made pursuant to any method of delivery set forth herein will also constitute an agreement and acknowledgement by the tendering Warrant holder that, among other things: (i) the Warrant holder agrees to exchange the tendered Warrants on the terms and conditions set forth in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and Letter of Transmittal and Consent, in each case as may be amended or supplemented prior to the Expiration Date; (ii) the Warrant holder consents to the Warrant Agreement; (iii) the Offer is discretionary and may be extended, modified, suspended or terminated by us as provided herein; (iv) such Warrant holder is voluntarily participating in the Offer; (v) the future value of our Warrants is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty; and (vi) such Warrant holder has read this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, Letter of Transmittal and Consent and Warrant Amendment.

Registered Holders of Warrants; Beneficial Owners of Warrants

For purposes of the tender procedures set forth below, the term “registered holder” means any person in whose name Warrants are registered on our books or who is listed as a participant in a clearing agency’s security position listing with respect to the Warrants.

Persons whose Warrants are held through a direct or indirect participant of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), such as a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other financial intermediary, are not

TABLE OF CONTENTS

considered registered holders of those Warrants but are “beneficial owners.” Beneficial owners cannot directly tender Warrants for exchange pursuant to the Offer. Instead, a beneficial owner must instruct its broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other financial intermediary to tender Warrants for exchange on behalf of the beneficial owner. See “— Required Communications by Beneficial Owners.”

Tendering Warrants Using Letter of Transmittal and Consent

A registered holder of Warrants may tender Warrants for exchange using a Letter of Transmittal and Consent in the form provided by us with this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. A Letter of Transmittal is to be used only if delivery of Warrants is to be made by book-entry transfer to the exchange agent’s account at DTC pursuant to the procedures set forth in “— Tendering Warrants Using Book-Entry Transfer”; provided, however, that it is not necessary to execute and deliver a Letter of Transmittal and Consent if instructions with respect to the tender of such Warrants are transmitted through DTC’s Automated Tender Offer Program (“ATOP”). If you are a registered holder of Warrants, unless you intend to tender those Warrants through ATOP, you should complete, execute and deliver a Letter of Transmittal and Consent to indicate the action you desire to take with respect to the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

In order for Warrants to be properly tendered for exchange pursuant to the Offer using a Letter of Transmittal and Consent, the registered holder of the Warrants being tendered must ensure that the exchange agent receives the following: (i) a properly completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal and Consent, in accordance with the instructions of the Letter of Transmittal and Consent (including any required signature guarantees); (ii) delivery of the Warrants by book-entry transfer to the exchange agent’s account at DTC; and (iii) any other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal and Consent.

In the Letter of Transmittal and Consent, the tendering registered Warrant holder must set forth: (i) its name and address; (ii) the number of Warrants being tendered by the holder for exchange; and (iii) certain other information specified in the form of Letter of Transmittal and Consent.

In certain cases, all signatures on the Letter of Transmittal and Consent must be guaranteed by an “Eligible Institution.” See “— Signature Guarantees.”

If the Letter of Transmittal and Consent is signed by someone other than the registered holder of the tendered Warrants (for example, if the registered holder has assigned the Warrants to a third-party), or if the Ordinary Shares to be issued upon exchange of the tendered Warrants are to be issued in a name other than that of the registered holder of the tendered Warrants, the tendered Warrants must be properly accompanied by appropriate assignment documents, in either case signed exactly as the name(s) of the registered holder(s) appear on the Warrants, with the signature(s) on the Warrants or assignment documents guaranteed by an Eligible Institution.

Any Warrants duly tendered and delivered as described above shall be automatically cancelled upon the issuance of Ordinary Shares in exchange for such Warrants as part of the completion of the Offer.

Signature Guarantees

In certain cases, all signatures on the Letter of Transmittal and Consent must be guaranteed by an “Eligible Institution.” An “Eligible Institution” is a bank, broker dealer, credit union, savings association or other entity that is a member in good standing of the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program or a bank, broker, dealer, credit union, savings association or other entity which is an “eligible guarantor institution,” as that term is defined in Rule 17Ad-15 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

Signatures on the Letter of Transmittal and Consent need not be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution if (i) the Letter of Transmittal and Consent is signed by the registered holder of the Warrants tendered therewith exactly as the name of the registered holder appears on such Warrants and such holder has not completed the box entitled “Special Issuance Instructions” or the box entitled “Special Delivery Instructions” in the Letter of Transmittal and Consent; or (ii) such Warrants are tendered for the account of an Eligible Institution.

In all other cases, an Eligible Institution must guarantee all signatures on the Letter of Transmittal and Consent by completing and signing the table in the Letter of Transmittal and Consent entitled “Guarantee of Signature(s).”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Required Communications by Beneficial Owners

Persons whose Warrants are held through a direct or indirect DTC participant, such as a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other financial intermediary, are not considered registered holders of those Warrants, but are “beneficial owners,” and must instruct the broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other financial intermediary to tender Warrants on their behalf. Your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other financial intermediary should have provided you with an “Instructions Form” with this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. The Instructions Form is also filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange forms a part. The Instructions Form may be used by you to instruct your broker or other custodian to tender and deliver Warrants on your behalf.

Tendering Warrants Using Book-Entry Transfer

The exchange agent has established an account for the Warrants at DTC for purposes of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. Any financial institution that is a participant in DTC’s system may make book-entry delivery of Warrants by causing DTC to transfer such Warrants into the exchange agent’s account in accordance with ATOP. However, even though delivery of Warrants may be effected through book-entry transfer into the exchange agent’s account at DTC, a properly completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal and Consent (with any required signature guarantees), or an “Agent’s Message” as described in the next paragraph, and any other required documentation, must in any case also be transmitted to and received by the exchange agent at its address set forth in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange prior to the Expiration Date, or the guaranteed delivery procedures described under “— Guaranteed Delivery Procedures” must be followed.

DTC participants desiring to tender Warrants for exchange pursuant to the Offer may do so through ATOP, and in that case the participant need not complete, execute and deliver a Letter of Transmittal and Consent. DTC will verify the acceptance and execute a book-entry delivery of the tendered Warrants to the exchange agent’s account at DTC. DTC will then send an “Agent’s Message” to the exchange agent for acceptance. Delivery of the Agent’s Message by DTC will satisfy the terms of the Offer and Consent Solicitation as to execution and delivery of a Letter of Transmittal and Consent by the DTC participant identified in the Agent’s Message. The term “Agent’s Message” means a message, transmitted by DTC to, and received by, the exchange agent and forming a part of a Book-Entry Confirmation, which states that DTC has received an express acknowledgment from the participant in DTC tendering the Warrants for exchange that such participant has received and agrees to be bound by the terms of the Letter of Transmittal and Consent and that our company may enforce such agreement against the participant. Any DTC participant tendering by book-entry transfer must expressly acknowledge that it has received and agrees to be bound by the Letter of Transmittal and Consent and that the Letter of Transmittal and Consent may be enforced against it.

Any Warrants duly tendered and delivered as described above shall be automatically cancelled upon the issuance of Ordinary Shares in exchange for such Warrants as part of the completion of the Offer.

Delivery of a Letter of Transmittal and Consent or any other required documentation to DTC does not constitute delivery to the Exchange Agent. See “— Timing and Manner of Deliveries.”

Guaranteed Delivery Procedures

If a registered holder of Warrants desires to tender its Warrants for exchange pursuant to the Offer, but (i) the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed on a timely basis, or (ii) time will not permit all required documents to reach the exchange agent prior to the Expiration Date, the holder can still tender its Warrants if all the following conditions are met:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In any case where the guaranteed delivery procedure is utilized for the tender of Warrants pursuant to the Offer, the issuance of Ordinary Shares for those Warrants tendered for exchange pursuant to the Offer and accepted pursuant to the Offer will be made only if the exchange agent has timely received the applicable foregoing items.

Timing and Manner of Deliveries

UNLESS THE GUARANTEED DELIVERY PROCEDURES DESCRIBED ABOVE ARE FOLLOWED, WARRANTS WILL BE PROPERLY TENDERED ONLY IF, BY THE EXPIRATION DATE, THE EXCHANGE AGENT RECEIVES SUCH WARRANTS BY BOOK-ENTRY TRANSFER, TOGETHER WITH A PROPERLY COMPLETED AND DULY EXECUTED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL AND CONSENT OR AN AGENT’S MESSAGE.

ALL DELIVERIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER AND CONSENT SOLICITATION, INCLUDING ANY LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL AND CONSENT AND THE TENDERED WARRANTS, MUST BE MADE TO THE EXCHANGE AGENT. NO DELIVERIES SHOULD BE MADE TO US. ANY DOCUMENTS DELIVERED TO US WILL NOT BE FORWARDED TO THE EXCHANGE AGENT AND THEREFORE WILL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE PROPERLY TENDERED. THE METHOD OF DELIVERY OF ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS IS AT THE OPTION AND RISK OF THE TENDERING WARRANT HOLDERS. IF DELIVERY IS BY MAIL, WE RECOMMEND REGISTERED MAIL WITH RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED (PROPERLY INSURED). IN ALL CASES, SUFFICIENT TIME SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO ENSURE TIMELY DELIVERY.

Determination of Validity

All questions as to the form of documents and the validity, eligibility (including time of receipt) and acceptance for exchange of any tender of Warrants will be determined by us, in our sole discretion, and our determination will be final and binding. We reserve the absolute right to reject any or all tenders of Warrants that we determine are not in proper form or reject tenders of Warrants that may, in the opinion of our counsel, be unlawful. We also reserve the absolute right to waive any defect or irregularity in any tender of any particular Warrant, whether or not similar defects or irregularities are waived in the case of other tendered Warrants. Neither we nor any other person will be under any duty to give notice of any defect or irregularity in tenders, nor shall any of us or them incur any liability for failure to give any such notice.

Fees and Commissions

Tendering Warrant holders who tender Warrants directly to the exchange agent will not be obligated to pay any charges or expenses of the exchange agent, the dealer manager or any brokerage commissions. Beneficial owners who hold Warrants through a broker or bank should consult that institution as to whether or not such institution will charge the owner any service fees in connection with tendering Warrants on behalf of the owner pursuant to the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

Transfer Taxes

We will pay all transfer taxes, if any, applicable to the transfer of Warrants to us in the Offer. If transfer taxes are imposed for any other reason, the amount of those transfer taxes, whether imposed on the registered holder or any other persons, will be payable by the tendering holder. Other reasons transfer taxes could be imposed include (i) if our Ordinary Shares are to be registered or issued in the name of any person other than the person signing the Letter of Transmittal and Consent, or (ii) if tendered Warrants are registered in the name of any person other than the person signing the Letter of Transmittal and Consent. If satisfactory evidence of payment of or exemption from those transfer taxes is not submitted with the Letter of Transmittal and Consent, the amount of those transfer taxes will be billed directly to the tendering holder and/or withheld from any payment due with respect to the Warrants tendered by such holder.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Withdrawal Rights

By tendering Warrants for exchange, a holder will be deemed to have validly delivered its consent to the Warrant Amendment. Tenders of Warrants made pursuant to the Offer may be withdrawn at any time prior to the Expiration Date. Consents to the Warrant Amendment in connection with the Consent Solicitation may be revoked at any time before the Expiration Date by withdrawing the tender of your Warrants. A valid withdrawal of tendered Warrants before the Expiration Date will be deemed to be a concurrent revocation of the related consent to the Warrant Amendment. Tenders of Warrants and consent to the Warrant Amendment may not be withdrawn after the Expiration Date. If the Offer Period is extended, you may withdraw your tendered Warrants at any time until the expiration of such extended Offer Period. After the Offer Period expires, such tenders are irrevocable, provided, however, that Warrants that are not accepted by us for exchange on or prior to June 12, 2018 may thereafter be withdrawn by you until such time as the Warrants are accepted by us for exchange.

To be effective, a written notice of withdrawal must be timely received by the exchange agent at its address identified in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. Any notice of withdrawal must specify the name of the person who tendered the Warrants for which tenders are to be withdrawn and the number of Warrants to be withdrawn. If the Warrants to be withdrawn have been delivered to the exchange agent, a signed notice of withdrawal must be submitted prior to release of such Warrants. In addition, such notice must specify the name of the registered holder (if different from that of the tendering Warrant holder). A withdrawal may not be cancelled, and Warrants for which tenders are withdrawn will thereafter be deemed not validly tendered for purposes of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. However, Warrants for which tenders are withdrawn may be tendered again by following one of the procedures described above in the section entitled “— Procedure for Tendering Warrants for Exchange” at any time prior to the Expiration Date.

A beneficial owner of Warrants desiring to withdraw tendered Warrants previously delivered through DTC should contact the DTC participant through which such owner holds its Warrants. In order to withdraw Warrants previously tendered, a DTC participant may, prior to the Expiration Date, withdraw its instruction by (i) withdrawing its acceptance through DTC’s Participant Tender Offer Program (“PTOP”) function, or (ii) delivering to the exchange agent by mail, hand delivery or facsimile transmission, notice of withdrawal of such instruction. The notice of withdrawal must contain the name and number of the DTC participant. A withdrawal of an instruction must be executed by a DTC participant as such DTC participant’s name appears on its transmission through the PTOP function to which such withdrawal relates. If the tender being withdrawn was made through ATOP, it may only be withdrawn through PTOP, and not by hard copy delivery of withdrawal instructions. A DTC participant may withdraw a tendered Warrant only if such withdrawal complies with the provisions described in this paragraph.

A holder who tendered its Warrants other than through DTC should send written notice of withdrawal to the exchange agent specifying the name of the Warrant holder who tendered the Warrants being withdrawn. All signatures on a notice of withdrawal must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution, as described above in the section entitled “— Procedure for Tendering Warrants for Exchange — Signature Guarantees”; provided, however, that signatures on the notice of withdrawal need not be guaranteed if the Warrants being withdrawn are held for the account of an Eligible Institution. Withdrawal of a prior Warrant tender will be effective upon receipt of the notice of withdrawal by the exchange agent. Selection of the method of notification is at the risk of the Warrant holder, and notice of withdrawal must be timely received by the exchange agent.

All questions as to the form and validity (including time of receipt) of any notice of withdrawal will be determined by us, in our sole discretion, which determination shall be final and binding. Neither we nor any other person will be under any duty to give notification of any defect or irregularity in any notice of withdrawal or incur any liability for failure to give any such notification.

Acceptance for Issuance of Shares

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, we will accept for exchange Warrants validly tendered until the Expiration Date, which is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 15, 2018, or such later time and date to which we may extend. The Ordinary Shares to be issued upon exchange of Warrants pursuant to the Offer, along with written notice from Exchange Agent confirming the balance of any Warrants not exchanged, will be delivered promptly following the Expiration Date. In all cases,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Warrants will only be accepted for exchange pursuant to the Offer after timely receipt by the exchange agent of (i) book-entry delivery of the tendered Warrants, (ii) a properly completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal and Consent, or compliance with ATOP where applicable, (iii) any other documentation required by the Letter of Transmittal and Consent, and (iv) any required signature guarantees.

For purposes of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, we will be deemed to have accepted for exchange Warrants that are validly tendered and for which tenders are not withdrawn, unless we give written notice to the Warrant holder of our non-acceptance.

Announcement of Results of the Offer and Consent Solicitation

We will announce the final results of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, including whether all of the conditions to the Offer and Consent Solicitation have been satisfied or waived and whether we will accept the tendered Warrants for exchange, as promptly as practicable following the end of the Offer Period. The announcement will be made by a press release and by amendment to the Schedule TO we file with the SEC in connection with the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

Background and Purpose of the Offer and Consent Solicitation

The Cision Board approved the Offer and Consent Solicitation on April 16, 2018. The purpose of the Offer and Consent Solicitation is to attempt to simplify our corporate structure and reduce the potential dilutive impact of the Warrants, thereby providing us with more flexibility for financing our operations in the future. The Warrants that are tendered for exchange pursuant to the Offer will be retired and cancelled automatically upon the issuance of Ordinary Shares in exchange for such Warrants pursuant to the Offer.

Agreements, Regulatory Requirements and Legal Proceedings

Other than as set forth under the sections entitled “The Offer and Consent Solicitation — Interests of Directors, Executive Officers and Others,” “The Offer and Consent Solicitation — Transactions and Agreements Concerning Our Securities” and “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions,” there are no present or proposed agreements, arrangements, understandings or relationships between us, and any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or any other person relating, directly or indirectly, to the Offer and Consent Solicitation or to our securities that are the subject of the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

Except for the requirements of applicable federal and state securities laws, we know of no federal or state regulatory requirements to be complied with or federal or state regulatory approvals to be obtained by us in connection with the Offer and Consent Solicitation. There are no antitrust laws applicable to the Offer and Consent Solicitation. The margin requirements under Section 7 of the Exchange Act, and the related regulations thereunder, are inapplicable to the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

There are no pending legal proceedings relating to the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

Interests of Directors, Executive Officers and Others

We do not beneficially own any of the Warrants. All of our executive officers other than Yujie Chen hold equity interests in Cision Owner pursuant to the Cision Owner Partnership Agreement. These executive officers have neither a controlling interest in Cision Owner nor direct or indirect voting or dispositive power with respect to Ordinary Shares of Cision held of record by Cision Owner. See “Management — Executive Compensation — Incentive Unit Awards.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table lists the Warrants beneficially owned by our directors, executive officers and other affiliates or related persons (all of which are Private Warrants) as of May 2, 2018:

Name		Aggregate Number of Warrants Beneficially Owned				Percentage of Warrants Beneficially Owned(1)
Canyon Holdings (Cayman), L.P.(2)			2,032,043				8.3	%
Capitol Acquisition Management 3 LLC(3)			4,324,307				17.7	%
Capitol Acquisition Founder 3 LLC(4)			1,441,436				5.9	%

The Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner have advised us that they intend to tender all of the Private Warrants held by them in the Offer; however, none of these parties are under any contractual obligation to tender such Warrants, and there can be no assurance that they will do so. Collectively, the Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner hold approximately 94.5% of the Private Warrants, representing approximately 31.8% of the total Warrants outstanding. If the Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner tender all of the Private Warrants held by them in the Offer and the holders of approximately 26.7% of the remaining outstanding Warrants agree to tender (and the other conditions described herein are satisfied) then the Warrant Amendment will be adopted. None of the holders of Private Warrants will receive any benefit by virtue of participation in the Offer that is not shared on a pro rata basis with holders of the Public Warrants exchanged pursuant to the Offer.

Market Price, Dividends and Related Shareholder Matters

Market Price of Ordinary Shares and Warrants

Capitol’s units commenced public trading upon consummation of its IPO on October 13, 2015, and its common stock and warrants commenced separate trading on December 7, 2015. Prior to the separation of Capitol’s units on December 7, 2015, there was no public market for its common stock.

Prior to the consummation of the Business Combination on June 29, 2017, Capitol’s common stock, warrants and units were each listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols “CLAC,” “CLACW” and “CLACU,” respectively. On June 30, 2017, our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols “CISN” and “CISN.WS,” respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows the high and low sale prices per share of Capitol’s common stock and warrants (for dates prior to June 30, 2017) or our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants (for dates on or after June 30, 2017), as applicable, as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market or New York Stock Exchange, respectively, for the periods indicated.

		Common stock/ ordinary shares								Warrants
		High				Low				High				Low
First Quarter 2016		$	9.75			$	9.40			$	0.65			$	0.30
Second Quarter 2016			9.80				9.62				0.40				0.32
Third Quarter 2016			10.00				9.65				0.70				0.40
Fourth Quarter 2016			10.00				9.80				0.87				0.63
First Quarter 2017			10.60				9.93				1.92				0.70
Second Quarter 2017			10.85				9.90				2.01				1.50
Third Quarter 2017			13.36				10.00				2.99				1.86
Fourth Quarter 2017			13.68				11.13				3.40				2.10
First Quarter 2018			12.68				11.24				3.05				2.05
Second Quarter 2018 (through May 8, 2018)			14.19				11.16				3.78				2.11

As of May 8, 2018, we had approximately 12 holders of record of our Ordinary Shares and 8 holders of record of our Warrants. These figures do not include the number of persons whose securities are held in nominee or “street” name accounts through brokers.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid, and do not anticipate declaring or paying, any cash dividends on our Ordinary Shares in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our credit facilities will include restrictions on our ability to issue dividends. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Liquidity and capital resources — Overview” for a discussion of our credit facilities’ restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends or other payments to us.

Source and Amount of Funds

Because this transaction is an offer to holders to exchange their existing Warrants for our Ordinary Shares, there is no source of funds or other cash consideration being paid by us to, or to us from, those tendering Warrant holders pursuant to the Offer, other than the amount of cash paid in lieu of a fractional share in the Offer. We estimate that the total amount of cash required to complete the transactions contemplated by the Offer and Consent Solicitation, including the payment of any fees, expenses and other related amounts incurred in connection with the transactions and the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares will be approximately $1.1 million. We expect to have sufficient funds to complete the transactions contemplated by the Offer and Consent Solicitation and to pay fees, expenses and other related amounts from our cash on hand.

Exchange Agent

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company has been appointed the exchange agent for the Offer and Consent Solicitation. The Letter of Transmittal and Consent and all correspondence in connection with the Offer should be sent or delivered by each holder of the Warrants, or a beneficial owner’s custodian bank, depositary, broker, trust company or other nominee, to the exchange agent at the address and telephone numbers set forth on the back cover page of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. We will pay the exchange agent reasonable and customary fees for its services and will reimburse it for its reasonable, out-of-pocket expenses in connection therewith.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Information Agent

D.F. King & Co., Inc. has been appointed as the information agent for the Offer and Consent Solicitation, and will receive customary compensation for its services. Questions concerning tender procedures and requests for additional copies of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange or the Letter of Transmittal and Consent should be directed to the information agent at the address and telephone numbers set forth on the back cover page of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange.

Dealer Manager

We have retained Citigroup Global Markets Inc. to act as dealer manager in connection with the Offer and Consent Solicitation and will pay the dealer manager a customary fee as compensation for its services. We will also reimburse the dealer manager for certain expenses. The obligations of the dealer manager to perform this function are subject to certain conditions. We have agreed to indemnify the dealer manager against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws. Questions about the terms of the Offer or Consent Solicitation may be directed to the dealer manager at its address and telephone number set forth on the back cover page of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange.

The dealer manager and its affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may include sales and trading, commercial and investment banking, advisory, investment management, investment research, principal investment, hedging, market making, brokerage and other financial and non-financial activities and services. The dealer manager and its affiliates have provided, and may in the future provide, a variety of these services to us and to persons and entities with relationships with us, for which they have received or will receive customary fees and expenses.

In the ordinary course of their various business activities, the dealer manager and its affiliates, officers, directors and employees may purchase, sell or hold a broad array of investments and actively traded securities, derivatives, loans, commodities, currencies, credit default swaps and other financial instruments for their own account and for the accounts of their customers, and such investment and trading activities may involve or relate to assets, securities and/or instruments of us (directly, as collateral securing other obligations or otherwise) and/or persons and entities with relationships with us. The dealer manager and its affiliates may also communicate independent investment recommendations, market color or trading ideas and/or publish or express independent research views in respect of such assets, securities or instruments and may at any time hold, or recommend to clients that they should acquire, long and/or short positions in such assets, securities and instruments.

In the ordinary course of its business, the dealer manager or its affiliates may at any time hold long or short positions, and may trade for their own accounts or the accounts of customers, in securities of Cision, including Warrants, and, to the extent that the dealer manager or its affiliates own Warrants during the Offer and Consent Solicitation, they may tender such Warrants under the terms of the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

Fees and Expenses

The expenses of soliciting tenders of the Warrants and the Consent Solicitation will be borne by us. The principal solicitations are being made by mail; however, additional solicitations may be made by facsimile transmission, telephone or in person by the dealer manager and the information agent, as well as by our officers and other employees and affiliates.

You will not be required to pay any fees or commissions to us, the dealer manager, the exchange agent or the information agent in connection with the Offer and Consent Solicitation. If your Warrants are held through a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee that tenders your Warrants on your behalf, your broker or other nominee may charge you a commission or service fee for doing so. You should consult your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee to determine whether any charges will apply.

Transactions and Agreements Concerning Our Securities

Other than as set forth below and in the sections of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Description of Capital Stock,” and as set forth in our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, there are no agreements, arrangements or understandings between the Company, or any of our directors or executive officers, and any other person with respect to our securities that are the subject of the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

The Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner have advised us that they intend to tender all of the Private Warrants held by them in the Offer; however, none of these parties are under any contractual obligation to tender such Warrants, and there can be no assurance that they will do so. Collectively, the Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner hold approximately 94.5% of the Private Warrants, representing approximately 31.8% of the total Warrants outstanding. If the Capitol Sponsors and Cision Owner tender all of the Private Warrants held by them in the Offer and the holders of approximately 26.7% of the remaining outstanding Warrants agree to tender (and the other conditions described herein are satisfied) then the Warrant Amendment will be adopted. None of the holders of Private Warrants will receive any benefit by virtue of participation in the Offer that is not shared on a pro rata basis with holders of the Public Warrants exchanged pursuant to the Offer.

Except as set forth in the section of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions,” neither we, nor any of our directors, executive officers or controlling persons, or any executive officers, directors, managers or partners of any of our controlling persons, has engaged in any transactions in our Warrants in the last 60 days.

Plans

Except as described in the sections of this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange entitled “Risk Factors” and “The Offer and Consent Solicitation,” neither the Company, nor any of its directors, executive officers, or controlling persons, or any executive officers, directors, managers or partners of its controlling persons, has any plans, proposals or negotiations that relate to or would result in:

Registration Under The Exchange Act

The Public Warrants currently are registered under the Exchange Act. This registration may be terminated upon application by us to the SEC if there are fewer than 300 record holders of the Public Warrants. We currently do not intend to deregister the Public Warrants, if any, that remain outstanding after completion of the Offer and Consent Solicitation. Notwithstanding any termination of the registration of our Public Warrants, we will continue to be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act as a result of the continuing registration of our Ordinary Shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Accounting Treatment

The Warrants are not currently reflected on our consolidated balance sheet. We will account for the exchange of Warrants as an ordinary share issuance for no additional value. The par value of each ordinary share issued in the Offer will be recorded as a credit to common stock and a debit to additional paid-in capital. Any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares will be recorded as a credit to cash and a debit to additional paid-in capital. The Offer will not modify the current accounting treatment for the un-exchanged warrants.

Absence of Appraisal Or Dissenters’ Rights

Holders of the Warrants do not have any appraisal or dissenters’ rights under applicable law in connection with the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

General

Subject to the limitations and qualifications stated herein, this discussion sets forth a summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the receipt of Ordinary Shares in exchange for the Warrants pursuant to the Offer, the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, and the ownership and disposition of Ordinary Shares. The discussion is based on the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect and all subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. We cannot assure you that a change in law will not alter significantly the tax consequences described in this summary. We have not sought and do not expect to seek any rulings from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, regarding the matters discussed below, and as a result, there can be no assurance that the IRS or the courts will agree with any of the conclusions stated in this description. This description assumes that holders hold the Warrants, and will hold the Ordinary Shares received upon exchange of the Warrants, as capital assets (generally, property held for investment). This description does not address all of the tax consequences that might be relevant to a holder’s particular circumstances and does not address the tax consequences to any special class of holder, including without limitation, holders of (directly, indirectly or constructively) 10% or more of the Ordinary Shares, dealers in securities or currencies, banks, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, financial institutions, broker-dealers, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, tax exempt organizations, traders in securities that elect the mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings, persons that hold Ordinary Shares or Warrants that are a hedge or that are hedged against currency or interest rate risks or that are part of a straddle conversion or “integrated” transaction, persons holding Ordinary Shares through a bank, financial institution or other entity, or a branch thereof, located, organized or resident outside the United States, certain U.S. expatriates, partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons subject to special tax accounting rules as a result of any item of gross income with respect to Ordinary Shares being taken into account in an applicable financial statement, investment funds and their investors, and U.S. holders (as defined below) whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar.

If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Ordinary Shares or Warrants, the tax treatment of the partnership and a partner in such partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the nature of the activities of the partnership. A holder that is a partnership, and the partners in such partnerships, should consult its tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the receipt of Ordinary Shares in the exchange, the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, and the ownership and disposition of Ordinary Shares received in the exchange.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This description does not address the tax consequences arising under the laws of any foreign, state, or local tax jurisdiction. Moreover, except to the extent specifically set forth below, this description does not address the U.S. federal estate and gift tax, or alternative minimum tax, or other non-income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Ordinary Shares received upon exchange of the Warrants.

This description is for general information only and is not tax advice. It is not intended to constitute a complete description of all tax consequences for holders relating to the exchange of Warrants for our Ordinary Shares, the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, or relating to the ownership and disposition of our Ordinary Shares. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the receipt of Ordinary Shares in exchange for the Warrants, the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, and of the ownership and disposition of such Ordinary Shares, applicable in your particular situation, as well as any consequences under the U.S. federal estate or gift tax, the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax, or under the tax laws of any state, local, foreign, or other taxing jurisdiction.

Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders

Subject to the limitations stated above, the following description addresses certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the receipt of Ordinary Shares in exchange for the Warrants, the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, and of the ownership and disposition of our Ordinary Shares, that are expected to apply if you are a U.S. holder of the Warrants or our Ordinary Shares. For this purpose, you are a “U.S. holder” if you are:

Exchange of Warrants for Ordinary Shares

Subject to the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) rules discussed below, for those holders of Warrants participating in the Offer and for any holders of Warrants subsequently exchanged for Ordinary Shares pursuant to the terms of the Warrant Amendment, we intend to treat your exchange of Warrants for our Ordinary Shares as a “recapitalization” within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code pursuant to which (i) you should not recognize any gain or loss on the exchange of Warrants for shares of our Ordinary Shares, (ii) your aggregate tax basis in the shares received in the exchange should equal your aggregate tax basis in your Warrants deemed to be surrendered in the exchange (except to the extent of any tax basis allocated to a fractional share for which a cash payment is received in connection with the Offer), and (iii) your holding period for the shares received in the exchange should include your holding period for the surrendered Warrants. Special tax basis and holding period rules apply to holders that acquired different blocks of Warrants at different prices or at different times. You should consult your tax advisor as to the applicability of these special rules to your particular circumstances. Any cash you receive in lieu of a fractional share of our Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Offer should generally result in gain or loss to you equal to the difference between the cash received and your tax basis in the fractional share. Because there is a lack of direct legal authority regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the exchange of Warrants for our Ordinary Shares, there can be no assurance in this regard and alternative characterizations by the IRS or a court are possible, including ones that would require U.S. holders to recognize taxable income. If our treatment of the exchange of Warrants for our Ordinary Shares were successfully challenged by the IRS and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

such exchange were not treated as a recapitalization for United States federal income tax purposes, exchanging U.S. holders may be subject to taxation in a manner analogous to the rules applicable to dispositions of Ordinary Shares described below under “Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Ownership and Disposition of Ordinary Shares” and exchanging non-U.S. holders may be subject to taxation in a manner analogous to the rules applicable to dispositions of Ordinary Shares described below under “Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders — Ownership and Disposition of Ordinary Shares.”

Although we believe the exchange of Warrants for Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Offer is a value-for-value transaction, because of the uncertainty inherent in any valuation, there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court would agree. If the IRS or a court were to view the exchange pursuant to the Offer as the issuance of Ordinary Shares to an exchanging holder having a value in excess of the Warrants surrendered by such holder, such excess value could be viewed as a constructive dividend under Section 305 of the Code. Although not free from doubt, it is expected that such constructive dividend, if any, should be considered a dividend of common stock on common stock, which generally should be nontaxable.

If you exchange Warrants for our Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Offer, and if you hold five percent or more of our Ordinary Shares prior to the exchange, or if you hold Warrants and other securities of ours prior to the exchange with a tax basis of $1 million or more, you will be required to file with your U.S. federal income tax return for the year in which the exchange occurs a statement setting forth certain information relating to the exchange (including the fair market value, prior to the exchange, of the Warrants transferred in the exchange and your tax basis, prior to the exchange, in our Ordinary Shares or securities), and to maintain permanent records containing such information.

Although the issue is not free from doubt, we intend to treat all Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer as having been exchanged for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment and to treat such deemed exchange as a “recapitalization” within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code, pursuant to which, subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, (i) you should not recognize any gain or loss on the deemed exchange of Warrants for “new” Warrants, (ii) your aggregate tax basis in the “new” Warrants deemed to be received in the exchange should equal your aggregate tax basis in your existing Warrants surrendered in the exchange, and (iii) your holding period for the “new” Warrants deemed to be received in the exchange should include your holding period for the surrendered Warrants. Special tax basis and holding period rules apply to holders that acquired different blocks of Warrants at different prices or at different times. You should consult your tax advisor as to the applicability of these special rules to your particular circumstances.

Because there is a lack of direct legal authority regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the deemed exchange of Warrants for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, there can be no assurance in this regard and alternative characterizations by the IRS or a court are possible, including ones that would require U.S. holders to recognize taxable income. If our treatment of the deemed exchange of Warrants for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment were successfully challenged by the IRS and such exchange were not treated as a recapitalization for United States federal income tax purposes, exchanging U.S. holders may be subject to taxation in a manner analogous to the rules applicable to dispositions of Ordinary Shares described below under “Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Ownership and Disposition of Ordinary Shares” and exchanging non-U.S. holders may be subject to taxation in a manner analogous to the rules applicable to dispositions of Ordinary Shares described below under “Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders — Ownership and Disposition of Ordinary Shares.”

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

General.  A foreign corporation will be treated as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if, applying applicable look-through rules, either:

For these purposes, we will be treated as owning a proportionate share of the assets and earning a proportionate share of the income of any other corporation in which we own, directly or indirectly, at least

TABLE OF CONTENTS

25% of the stock. Subject to various exceptions, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties and rents (other than certain royalties and rents derived in the active conduct of a trade or business and not derived from a related person), and gains derived from the disposition of passive assets. Under proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations, the holder of an option to acquire stock in a PFIC is considered to be the owner of that stock.

Based on the value of our assets and the composition of our income and assets, we do not believe we were treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income purposes for our taxable year ended December 31, 2017 and do not expect to be treated as a PFIC for the foreseeable future. However, the determination of PFIC status is based on an annual determination that cannot be made until the close of a taxable year, involves extensive factual investigation, including ascertaining the fair market value of all of our assets on a quarterly basis and the character of each item of income that we earn, and is subject to uncertainty in several respects. We must make a separate determination each year as to whether we are a PFIC. As a result, our PFIC status may change. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will not be treated as a PFIC for our current taxable year ending December 31, 2018, or for any future taxable year, or that the IRS will not take a contrary position.

If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold a Warrant or Ordinary Shares, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which you hold a Warrant or Ordinary Shares. However, if we cease to be a PFIC, you may avoid some of the adverse effects of the PFIC regime by making a “deemed sale” election with respect to the Warrant or Ordinary Shares, as applicable.

Consequences if a PFIC.  If we are determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. holder of our Ordinary Shares or Warrants, in the absence of a “qualifying electing fund” election (which, as noted below, will not be available to you), will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution” that you receive and any gain you realize from a sale or other disposition (including a pledge) of the Ordinary Shares or Warrants, unless you make a “mark-to-market” election as discussed below (which would apply only to Ordinary Shares). Distributions you receive in a taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions you received during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or your holding period for the Ordinary Shares will be treated as an excess distribution.

Under these rules:

Under proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations, for purposes of the above rules (i) the exercise of a warrant to acquire stock in a PFIC is not treated as a disposition of PFIC stock and (ii) gain is not recognized on a disposition of PFIC stock that results from a nonrecognition transfer if in the transfer PFIC stock is exchanged for stock in the same or another corporation that is also a PFIC. However, (i) the exchange of Warrants for Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Offer or (ii) the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment would not be eligible for those rules if this were considered to be a taxable disposition of shares of PFIC stock. U.S. holders of Warrants should consult their tax advisors with respect to the application of these rules to the exercise or amendment of their Warrants if we are a PFIC.

QEF Election.  In certain circumstances, a U.S. holder of shares in a PFIC may avoid the adverse tax consequences described above by making a “qualified electing fund” election to include in income its share of the corporation’s income on a current basis. However, you may make a qualified electing fund election with respect to your Ordinary Shares only if we furnish you annually with a PFIC annual information

TABLE OF CONTENTS

statement as specified in the applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations. We currently do not intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable you to make a qualified electing fund election.

Mark-to-Market Election.  Alternatively, a U.S. holder of “marketable stock” (as defined below) in a PFIC may make a mark-to-market election with respect to stock to elect out of the tax treatment discussed above under “Consequences if a PFIC”. If you make a valid mark-to-market election for your Ordinary Shares you will include in income each year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Ordinary Shares as of the close of your taxable year over your adjusted basis in such Ordinary Shares. You are allowed a deduction for the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of the Ordinary Shares over their fair market value as of the close of the taxable year. However, deductions are allowable only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains on the Ordinary Shares included in your income for prior taxable years. Amounts included in your income under a mark-to-market election, as well as gain on the actual sale or other disposition of the Ordinary Shares, are treated as ordinary income. Ordinary loss treatment also applies to the deductible portion of any mark-to-market loss on the Ordinary Shares, as well as to any loss realized on the actual sale or disposition of the Ordinary Shares, to the extent that the amount of such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included for such Ordinary Shares. Your basis in the ordinary shares will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts. If you make such an election, the tax rules that apply to distributions by corporations that are not PFICs would apply to distributions by us, except that the preferential tax rate discussed below under “Ownership and Disposition of Ordinary Shares — Dividends” would not apply.

The mark-to-market election is available only for “marketable stock,” which is stock that is traded in other than de minimis quantities, or regularly traded, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter on a qualified exchange or other market, as defined in applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations. Our Ordinary Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, which is a qualified exchange or other market for these purposes. Consequently, as long as our Ordinary Shares are regularly traded, the mark-to-market election would be available to a holder of our Ordinary Shares if we become a PFIC. If any of our subsidiaries are or become PFICs, the mark-to-market election will not be available with respect to the shares of such subsidiaries that are treated as owned by you. Consequently, you could be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to income of the lower-tier PFICs the value of which already had been taken into account indirectly via mark-to-market adjustments.

Currently, a mark-to-market election may not be made with respect to warrants. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the availability and tax consequences of a mark-to-market election under their particular circumstances.

Lower-Tier PFICs.  Under attribution rules, if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you for any taxable year, to the extent any of our subsidiaries are also PFICs, you will be deemed to own shares in such lower-tier PFICs that are directly or indirectly owned by us in the proportion that the value of the Ordinary Shares you own bears to the value of all of our Ordinary Shares, and you may be subject to the rules described in the preceding paragraphs with respect to the shares of such lower-tier PFICs you are deemed to own. We do not expect to provide to a U.S. holder the information that may be required to make or maintain a QEF election with respect to any lower-tier PFIC. Without such statements a U.S. holder would not be able to make a QEF election. In addition, a mark-to-market election is not available with respect to lower tier PFICs. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the tax issues raised by lower-tier PFICs.

Reporting.  A U.S. holder that owns (or is deemed to own) shares in a PFIC during any taxable year of the U.S. holder, may have to file an IRS Form 8621 (whether or not a QEF or market-to-market election is made) and such other information as may be required by the U.S. Treasury Department. Failure to do so, if required, will extend the statute of limitations until such required information is furnished to the IRS.

The rules dealing with PFICs and with the QEF and mark-to-market elections are very complex and are affected by various factors in addition to those described above. Accordingly, U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of the PFIC rules to such securities under their particular circumstances.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ownership and Disposition of Ordinary Shares

Dividends.  We do not anticipate paying dividends on our Ordinary Shares. Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, distributions of cash or property that we pay on our Ordinary Shares will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles) and will be includible in your gross income as ordinary dividend income when actually or constructively received by you. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in our Ordinary Shares, and thereafter will be treated as capital gain from the sale or exchange of the Ordinary Shares. However, we may not calculate earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal tax principles. In that case, we intend to treat the full amount of any distribution by the Company to U.S. holders as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Dividends received by a non-corporate U.S. holder, including an individual, may qualify for the lower rates of tax applicable to “qualified dividend income,” provided that (1) our Ordinary Shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States and (2) we are not a PFIC for our taxable year in which the dividend is paid and the preceding taxable year. Under a published IRS Notice, common or ordinary shares are considered to be readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States if they are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, as our Ordinary Shares are. Accordingly, subject to the PFIC rules discussed above (see “— Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules”), dividends paid to a non-corporate U.S. holder with respect to Ordinary Shares for which the requisite holding period is satisfied should be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income.

Even if dividends would otherwise be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income, a non-corporate U.S. holder will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation if the non-corporate U.S. holder does not hold our Ordinary Shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date or if the non-corporate U.S. holder elects to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends of a qualified foreign corporation if the non-corporate U.S. holder receiving the dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the availability of the lower tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income for any dividends that we pay with respect to the Ordinary Shares, as well as the effect of any change in applicable law.

If you are a corporate U.S. holder, dividends you receive with respect to our Ordinary Shares will be taxable at regular rates and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to domestic corporations in respect of dividends received from other domestic corporations.

Dividends will generally be treated as income from foreign sources for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes and will generally constitute passive category income. Depending on the U.S. holder’s individual facts and circumstances, a U.S. holder may be eligible, subject to a number of complex limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit not in excess of any applicable treaty rate in respect of any foreign withholding taxes imposed on dividends received on our Ordinary Shares. A U.S. holder who does not elect to claim a foreign tax credit for foreign tax withheld may instead claim a deduction, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in respect of such withholding, but only for a year in which such U.S. holder elects to do so for all creditable foreign income taxes.

The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex and the outcome of their application depends in large part on the U.S. holder’s individual facts and circumstances. Accordingly, U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Sale or Exchange.  Subject to the PFIC discussion above, upon a sale or other taxable disposition of our Ordinary Shares, you generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property you receive on the disposition and (ii) your adjusted tax basis for the Ordinary Shares. The capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if you held the Ordinary Shares for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any gain or loss that you recognize on a disposition of our Ordinary Shares generally will be treated as

TABLE OF CONTENTS

U.S.-source income or loss for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the proper treatment of gain or loss, as well as the availability of a foreign tax credit, in your particular circumstances.

Tax on Net Investment Income

A 3.8% Medicare contribution tax will generally apply to all or some portion of the net investment income of a U.S. holder who is an individual, estate or trust with adjusted gross income that exceeds a threshold amount. For these purposes, dividends received with respect to our Ordinary Shares, and gains or losses realized from the taxable disposition of our Ordinary Shares, will generally be taken into account in computing your net investment income. Each U.S. holder that is an individual, estate or trust should consult its own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this tax provision on their ownership and disposition of Ordinary Shares.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Unless an exception applies, information reporting to the IRS generally will be required with respect to payments on Ordinary Shares and proceeds of the sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of Ordinary Shares paid to U.S. holders, other than corporations and other exempt recipients. Backup withholding, currently at the rate of 24%, may apply to those payments if such a holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number to the paying agent and to certify that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. The amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules are not an additional tax and may be refunded, or credited against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS. In addition, certain U.S. holders who are individuals that hold certain foreign financial assets (which may include Ordinary Shares), or who have a beneficial interest in or signatory authority over certain foreign financial accounts, are required to report information relating to such assets or accounts, subject to certain exceptions. You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the application of the information reporting and backup withholding requirements to your particular situation.

Information Reporting with Respect to Foreign Financial Assets

U.S. holders who are individuals or certain entities generally will be required to report our name, address and such information relating to an interest in our Ordinary Shares as is necessary to identify the class or issue of which your Ordinary Shares are a part. These requirements are subject to exceptions, including an exception for Ordinary Shares held in accounts maintained by certain financial institutions and an exception applicable if the aggregate value of all “specified foreign financial assets” (as defined in the Code) does not exceed $50,000. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of these information reporting rules.

Tax Consequences To Non-U.S. Holders

Subject to the limitations stated above, the following description addresses certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the receipt of Ordinary Shares in exchange for the Warrants, the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, and of the ownership and disposition of our Ordinary Shares, that are expected to apply if you are a non-U.S. holder of the Warrants or our Ordinary Shares. For this purpose, you are a “non-U.S. holder” if you are an individual, corporation, estate, or trust that is not a U.S. holder as defined above. Special rules may apply to certain non-U.S. holders such as “controlled foreign corporations,” “passive foreign investment companies,” individuals present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition (but who are not U.S. residents) or, in certain circumstances, individuals who are former U.S. citizens or residents.

Exchange of Warrants For Ordinary Shares

Your exchange of Warrants for our Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Offer, and the deemed exchange of Warrants not exchanged for Ordinary Shares in the Offer for “new” Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Amendment, should generally have the same tax consequences as described above for U.S. holders (other than for foreign tax credit purposes). Assuming you are not engaged the conduct of a trade or business within the U.S., capital gain or loss you recognize with respect to the receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, and you should not be required to make any U.S. federal income tax filings solely on account of the exchange of Warrants for our Ordinary Shares or the receipt of cash in lieu of fractional Ordinary Shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ownership and Disposition of Ordinary Shares

Dividends.  We do not anticipate paying dividends on our Ordinary Shares. Dividends (including constructive dividends) paid or deemed paid to a non-U.S. holder in respect to our Ordinary Shares generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, unless the dividends are effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such holder maintains in the United States).

Sale or Exchange.  Subject to the discussion below regarding backup withholding, a non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of our Ordinary Shares, unless:

Gain described in the first bullet point above will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at the regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates in the same manner as if such holder were a resident of the United States. Gain described in the second bullet point above will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a flat 30% rate (or such lower rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty), but may be offset by U.S. source capital losses (even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States), provided that the non-U.S. holder has timely filed a U.S. federal income tax return with respect to such losses.

Dividends and gains that are effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base in the United States) generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax (but not the Medicare contribution tax) at the same regular U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to a comparable U.S. holder and, in the case of a non-U.S. holder that is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or a lower applicable tax treaty rate.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, dividends you receive with respect to our Ordinary Shares, and any U.S. federal withholding tax withheld with respect to those dividends, are reported to the IRS and to you, regardless of whether withholding is reduced or eliminated by an applicable income tax treaty. Copies of this information reporting may also be provided under the provisions of a specific tax treaty, or under the provisions of a tax information exchange agreement, to the tax authorities in the country in which you reside or are established. Amounts you receive from of a sale or other disposition of our Ordinary Shares effected through the U.S. office of any broker (as defined in applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations) or from a sale or other disposition conducted outside the United States through certain U.S.-related brokers, are also reported to the IRS and to you.

You will generally be exempt from backup withholding on dividends and other amounts you receive with respect to our Ordinary Shares if you provide a certification (on an applicable IRS Form W-8) or proof of exempt status as described above with respect to U.S. federal income tax withholding. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment will be allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle you to a refund, provided you timely furnish the required information or returns to the IRS.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exchange Agent

The depositary and exchange agent for the Offer and Consent Solicitation is:

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
1 State Street, 30^th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Facsimile: (212) 616-7616

Other Events

On April 30, 2018, Cision received a letter from a representative of one of the holders of Warrants alleging that the Offer, the Consent Solicitation and the transactions contemplated thereby violate Cayman Islands and/or New York law. The letter demands that the Offer and the Consent Solicitation be rescinded immediately. On May 2, 2018, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., the dealer manager for the Offer and Consent Solicitation, also received a letter from the same representative of one of the holders of Warrants purporting to notify the dealer manager that such Warrant holder believes that the Prospectus/Offer to Exchange does not accurately disclose the legal risks associated with the allegations set forth in the letter described in the previous sentence consistent with Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act. Cision believes that the claims set forth in the letters are without merit.

Additional Information; Amendments

We have filed with the SEC a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO, of which this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange is a part. We recommend that Warrant holders review the Schedule TO, including the exhibits, and our other materials that have been filed with the SEC before making a decision on whether to accept the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

We will assess whether we are permitted to make the Offer and Consent Solicitation in all jurisdictions. If we determine that we are not legally able to make the Offer and Consent Solicitation in a particular jurisdiction, we will inform Warrant holders of this decision. The Offer and Consent Solicitation is not made to those holders who reside in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful.

Our board of directors recognizes that the decision to accept or reject the Offer and Consent Solicitation is an individual one that should be based on a variety of factors and Warrant holders should consult with personal advisors if they have questions about their financial or tax situation.

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act and in accordance therewith file and furnish reports and other information with the SEC. All reports and other documents we have filed or furnished with the SEC, including the registration statement on Form S-4 relating to the Offer and Consent Solicitation, or will file or furnish with the SEC in the future, can be accessed electronically on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

If you have any questions regarding the Offer and Consent Solicitation or need assistance, you should contact the information agent for the Offer and Consent Solicitation. You may request additional copies of this document, the Letter of Transmittal and Consent or the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery from the information agent. All such questions or requests should be directed to:

D.F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street, 22^nd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Banks and Brokers Call Collect: (212) 269-5550
All Others Call Toll-Free: (800) 967-4607
Email: cision@dfking.com

We will amend our offering materials, including this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, to the extent required by applicable securities laws to disclose any material changes to information previously published, sent or given by us to Warrant holders in connection with the Offer and Consent Solicitation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table sets forth selected historical financial information derived from (i) our unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2018 and the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange, (ii) our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (and for the period from April 14, 2014 (inception) through December 31, 2014) and (iii) our audited financial statements not included in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange relating to our balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014. You should read the following selected financial data in conjunction with the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and any applicable prospectus supplement.

		For the three months ended March 31,								For the year ended December 31,												Period from April 14, 2014 (inception to December 31, 2014)
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)		2018				2017				2017				2016				2015
Statements of operations data:
Revenue		$	179,293			$	145,818			$	631,637			$	467,772			$	333,958			$	170,114
Cost of revenue			64,278				45,066				200,836				162,583				125,006				74,552
Gross profit			115,015				100,752				430,801				305,189				208,952				95,562
Operating costs and expenses:
Sales and marketing			29,679				27,290				114,750				92,594				71,603				56,029
Research and development			6,700				5,452				22,102				19,445				16,604				5,657
General and administrative			46,222				40,232				166,759				135,737				88,448				112,722
Amortization of intangible assets			20,250				21,011				89,159				77,058				59,914				22,065
Total operating costs and expenses			102,851				93,985				392,770				324,834				236,569				196,473
Operating income (loss)			12,164				6,767				38,031				(19,645	)			(27,617	)			(100,911	)
Non operating income (expense)
Foreign exchange (losses) gains			(7,883	)			(1,948	)			(5,458	)			6,299				(10,886	)			(10,992	)
Interest and other income, net			(256	)			2,049				2,132				831				5,750				339
Interest expense			(19,688	)			(36,915	)			(116,466	)			(117,997	)			(61,398	)			(28,408	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt			(2,432	)			—				(51,872	)			(23,591	)			—				—
Total non operating loss			(30,259	)			(36,814	)			(171,664	)			(134,458	)			(66,534	)			(39,061	)
Loss before income taxes			(18,095	)			(30,047	)			(133,633	)			(154,103	)			(94,151	)			(139,972	)
Benefit from income taxes			(17,682	)			(7,054	)			(10,591	)			(55,691	)			(3,607	)			(31,010	)
Net loss		$	(413	)		$	(22,993	)		$	(123,042	)			(98,412	)			(90,544	)		$	(108,962	)
Net loss per share (basic and diluted)		$	(0.00	)		$	(0.81	)		$	(1.63	)		$	(3.47	)		$	(3.23	)
Statements of cash flow data:
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities			36,303				12,838			$	68,848			$	17,373			$	22,422			$	(50,804	)
Investing activities			(71,485	)			(32,993	)			(79,988	)			(819,416	)			(10,664	)			(771,555	)
Financing activities			(6,366	)			26,009				121,945				808,353				(8,568	)			(851,819	)

		As of March 31, 2018				As of December 31,
						2017				2016				2015				2014
Balance Sheet data:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	107,848			$	148,654			$	35,135			$	30,606			$	28,577
Total assets			1,981,052				1,935,358				1,787,068				918,930				1,037,261
Total liabilities			1,637,596				1,618,989				2,146,121				1,124,958				1,146,617
Mandatory redeemable stockholder’s equity			—				—				701				649				5
Total stockholder’s equity (deficit)			343,456				316,369				(359,754	)			(206,677	)			(110,818	)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BUSINESS OF CISION AND CERTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT CISION

Overview

We are a leading global provider of PR software, media distribution, media intelligence and related professional services, as measured by revenue estimates from Burton-Taylor International Consulting LLC. Public relations and communications professionals use our products and services to help manage, execute and measure their strategic PR and communications programs. We believe that we are an industry-standard SaaS solution for PR and marketing professionals and are deeply embedded in industry workflow.

We deliver sophisticated, easy-to-use platform for communicators to reach relevant media influencers and craft compelling campaigns that impact customer behavior. With rich monitoring and analytics, Cision Communications CloudTM (“C3”), a cloud-based platform that integrates each of our point solutions into a single unified interface, arms brands with the insights they need to link their earned media to strategic business objectives, while aligning it with owned and paid channels. This platform enables companies and brands to build consistent, meaningful and enduring relationships with influencers and buyers in order to amplify their marketplace influence.

We have undergone a strategic transformation since GTCR’s initial investment in 2014, evolving into a PR and marketing software leader through a series of complementary acquisitions. The acquisitions of Cision and Vocus, Inc. in 2014 and their subsequent merger established the foundation of the core media database, monitoring and analysis business. Over the 12 months following this initial merger, we acquired Discovery Group Holdings Ltd. to expand our global footprint and also completed acquisitions of Visible, Inc. and Viralheat, Inc. to enhance our social media functionality. The subsequent acquisition of PRN Group in 2016 added the depth and breadth of a global distribution network and making us, we believe, to be the only vendor with a comprehensive global solution for PR professionals. Following these acquisitions, in October 2016, we introduced our C3 platform. In the first quarter of 2017, we acquired Bulletin Intelligence, LLC, Bulletin News Network, LLC and Bulletin News Investment, LLC to expand our capability to provide expert-curated executive briefings for the Executive Office of the President and corporate C-Suite executives. In the second quarter of 2017, we acquired L’Argus de la Presse, a Paris-based provider of media monitoring services to expand our media monitoring solutions and enhance our access to French media content. We acquired CEDROM-SNi Inc. in December 2017 and PRIME Research Group in January 2018 in order to further expand upon our media measurement and analysis services and improve our digital media monitoring solutions.

We provide our comprehensive solution principally through subscription contracts which are generally one year or longer, with different tiers of pricing depending on the level of functionality and customer support required. Our SaaS delivery model provides a stable recurring revenue base. In 2017, we generated $674 million of revenue, on a pro forma basis assuming a full year of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus and CEDROM revenues, and, on the same pro forma basis, approximately 83% of our revenue was generated by customers purchasing services on a subscription or recurring basis.

We consider services recurrent if customers routinely purchase these services from us pursuant to negotiated “rate card” or similar arrangements, even if we do not have subscription agreements with them. As of December 31, 2017, we had more than 75,000 customers, of which the top 25 customers only accounted for approximately 4% of 2017 revenues, on a pro forma basis assuming a full year of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus and CEDROM revenues.

Industry

PR professionals are responsible for critical corporate functions including communications and relations with media, government, consumers, industry and community stakeholders. The process of managing relationships and communications with journalists, analysts, public officials and other key influencers and audiences is vital to an organization achieving its corporate objectives and financial success. PR is top-of-mind for senior management executives and a key component of how companies manage and enhance their brands’ reputation through the media. The primary activities of in-house PR departments and PR agencies include:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Central to all PR activities is a distribution strategy, which determines how an organization delivers consistent and well executed communications to key constituents. The PR function is rapidly evolving with the proliferation of digital media, as PR professionals work to optimize communications across multiple online, mobile and social channels as well as traditional media outlets. In a multi-channel, data-driven environment, content can be distributed to a significantly larger and more targeted audience, increasing the importance of a broad and reliable distribution network and creating demand for integrated solutions that include distribution, targeting, monitoring and reporting. The importance of distribution to broader PR success was a driving force behind our decision to acquire PR Newswire, the world’s largest press release distribution network, as measured by revenue estimates from Burton-Taylor International Consulting LLC.

Products and Services

C3, our cloud-based software platform, delivers critical functionality across the entire earned media lifecycle. We believe that C3 is the first software solution that allows communications professionals to plan, execute and analyze PR campaigns in a fully integrated fashion. Given the recent launch of C3, the majority of our revenue today comes from customers who purchase only a subset of the capabilities we currently offer. As C3 continues to expand its capabilities and these customers are migrated onto the C3 platform, we will attempt to upsell additional capabilities. For example, a customer who previously used our prior monitoring technology to plan campaigns and monitor campaign results will now be a candidate to purchase press release distribution services, a capability that we obtained in 2016 through the PR Newswire acquisition. Customers who purchase the press release distribution service within C3 will have improved ability to measure the return on investment of specific campaign activities compared to customers who use other press release distribution services that cannot be accessed within the C3 platform.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 83% of our revenue was subscription-based or recurring, with only 17% being transactional. We consider services recurrent if customers routinely purchase these services from us pursuant to negotiated “rate card” or similar arrangements, even if we do not have subscription agreements with them. Recurring and transactional revenue is largely related to our press release distribution services — a capability that we enhanced with the acquisition of PR Newswire in June 2016 — and we are integrating into our broader platform. These services are increasingly sold on a subscription basis as part of C3.

Media Database

Discovering and maintaining relationships with relevant journalists and other influencers who communicate an organization’s message to the public are critical to any earned media strategy. We offer the largest database in the world, based on database revenue estimates from Burton-Taylor International Consulting LLC, with contacts for approximately 1.6 million journalists and other influencers across 200 countries, including over 300,000 digital influencers. The database is updated more than 20,000 times daily to provide the most accurate and timely information to PR and communications professionals.

Our media database is integrated with CRM tools and content generation and distribution features to give PR and communications professionals access to relevant influencers when planning a campaign as well as to schedule and record all interactions with contacts. Access to the database is offered both on a regional and on a global basis.

Media Distribution

The distribution strategy of an earned media campaign determines how a company delivers consistent and well-executed communications to influencers across the media spectrum. In a multi-channel, data-driven environment, press releases and other content can be distributed to a significantly larger audience, increasing the importance of a broad and reliable distribution network. Our distribution product allows earned media professionals to execute campaigns and distribute corporate news, events information, content and multimedia through press releases, web and email. Compared to free, high volume channels such as social media and corporate newsrooms, we believe our distribution platform is an important way for brands to signal the relative importance of a message. This signaling mechanism is often the difference between a message becoming part of the “noise” or ending up in the hands of a key influencer. Brands compete for influencer attention with several thousand stories that are transmitted over the major distribution networks in a day, which compares favorably to competing with 500 million tweets per day on Twitter.

We believe we have the largest global distribution network of its kind in the world, based on distribution revenue estimates from Burton-Taylor International Consulting LLC. Our network reaches traditional and digital media in more than 170 countries in over 40 languages, including major media organizations, over 10,000 syndicated websites and over 900,000 contacts such as journalists, bloggers and social influencers. Our products enable communications professionals to distribute press releases and other content such as photos, videos, infographics, financial information and articles through web, wire and email. In addition, we offer around-the-clock editorial support for clients.

Our premium distribution product is PR Newswire. For more than 60 years, the PR Newswire offering has represented an industry standard for high-impact dissemination of critical news, financial releases and other

TABLE OF CONTENTS

content and has customers spanning Fortune 2000 multinationals, small and medium businesses, public relations agencies and government entities.

Our premium PR Newswire offering is provided to customers globally, with international operations supporting these customers in Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America. Additional premium offerings include a comprehensive suite of products and services for Investor Relations professionals, including distribution for earnings and other material news, webcasts and conference calls, IR website hosting, and virtual investor conferences.

We offer alternative distribution products, such as iReach, WebMax, and PRWeb to clients who seek a more economical option. These distribution products generally provide customers the ability to distribute shorter releases across a smaller network with web-focused delivery and search engine discovery.

We provide multimedia content and broadcast distribution services to customers under our MultiVu offering. These services include creative expertise and video production to help companies enhance their communications through webcasts and broadcasts. We also provide hosted, white-label web pages integrated into a customer’s website and managed on behalf of investor relations and public relations departments.

We provide marketing professionals with a software application that can be used to create, publish and distribute professional-quality e-mails. Under our iContact offering, we provide this cloud-based e-mail and social marketing software application that integrates with social media platforms and Salesforce’s Sales Cloud.

Media Monitoring

We enable PR and communications professionals to track the media coverage of their companies and brands, assess the impact of strategic initiatives and discover how influencers portray their content and gauge overall brand sentiment. Our products allow clients to monitor all forms of media, including global print, digital, social media, television and radio sources, and store articles, content and corporate news. Our media monitoring software tracks and monitors content on over 200,000 digital, print, social and broadcast sources in over 150 countries. We deliver over 2 million stories to our customers every day. Additionally, through the acquisition of Bulletin Intelligence, we have expanded our capability to provide expert-curated executive briefings to the Executive Office of the President and corporate C-Suite executives. With the additional acquisition of Argus, we expect to provide our existing global customer base with enhanced access to French media content, helping them understand and quantify the impact of their communications and media coverage in France.

We also offer tools to filter and automatically update relevant news sources and content to make monitoring an efficient aspect of customers’ overall PR strategies. The graphics below are examples of monitoring insights we provide to customers from their PR campaigns.

Media Analysis

We provide functionality that enables our customers to assess media coverage by collecting and analyzing data and metrics configured to meet the needs of the client. Metrics on audience engagement, campaign reach and effectiveness, sentiment and competitive benchmarking allow PR and communications professionals to quantify campaign results of earned media strategies. Analysis also provides data-driven insights that inform the creation of future campaigns and marketing investment.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our media analysis capabilities also include a robust technology-enabled service aimed at Global 2000 companies with complex PR strategies, as well as an automated self-serve module that can be configured by customers for high-level reporting needs. The charts below are examples of analysis insights we provide to customers from their PR campaigns.

Customers

As of December 31, 2017, we had a large and highly diversified customer base of more than 75,000 customers, spanning the Americas, Europe and Asia. Customers range from small businesses to large enterprises across a wide range of industries and also include a large number of PR agencies. Annual spend for these customers can range from hundreds of dollars for small businesses to several million for the largest customers.

Our customer base includes 92 of the world’s 100 most valuable brands, according to Forbes.com, 97 of the top 100 PR companies in the U.S. and 72 of the top 80 PR companies in the UK, as reported by PRWeek.

Select customers include McDonald’s, Samsung, Edelman, Coca Cola, Google, and Nike. Our top 25 customers account for approximately 4% of 2017 revenues, on a pro forma basis assuming a full year of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus and CEDROM revenues.

Technology Infrastructure

Technology is key to our Communications Cloud strategy of creating a unique competitive advantage by offering what we believe to be the only globally accessible end-to-end PR workflow solution in the market. Our PR software platforms are built upon a highly scalable and flexible component or multi-tenant based infrastructures in a hybrid cloud environment, allowing us to provide a cost effective and secure offering. The platforms leverage proven delivery technologies along with leading big data and analytic offerings to create a competitive advantage. Our online infrastructure is geographically distributed across multiple public and private cloud locations to facilitate both resilience and performance.

We have an experienced and highly skilled technology team managing product development and IT operations. We utilize a modified agile development approach with a standard 2-week cadence but can accelerate or extend deployment timeframes as needed. This agile approach to development is partnered with an IT Infrastructure Library focused “DevOps” based approach to ensure that there are appropriate controls and a heightened focus on the customer experience.

We maintain a focus on continual improvement from both an IT performance and security perspective. For our critical systems and platforms, we have implemented initiatives and procedures that include:

We intend to extend these approaches to our other systems, platforms and acquisitions as appropriate.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Over the past two years, we have initiated several consolidation and integration initiatives aimed at simplifying and modernizing our critical infrastructures to increase flexibility, improve margins and further improve the customer experience. These initiatives include data center consolidations, infrastructure upgrades, management information software system enhancements and the deployment of enhanced global operating models across our operations.

Sales & Marketing

We operate direct sales organizations throughout the United States and within each of our international markets. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 750 direct sales professionals. In the United States, we divide our direct sales professionals into two distinct go-to-market teams: new business teams and account management (renewal) teams.

Within each of the two go-to-market teams, U.S. direct sales professionals are further segmented into groups based upon customer size, including an enterprise group for large customers and agencies, a midmarket group for medium size customers and a small business group for small customers. Our U.S. new business sales teams source and develop new customer relationships. Our U.S. account management sales teams focus on maintaining customer relationships, increasing product penetration and ensuring contract renewals. In the United Kingdom and in several other larger international markets, our direct sales structure is similar to that in the United States. In our smaller international markets, there are sometimes unified direct sales structures without clear distinction between new business teams and account management teams.

Our marketing team focuses on attracting, acquiring and retaining customers through digital demand campaigns, brand building and showcases of customer success. With persona-based content aimed at communications professionals, the team delivers cross-channel campaigns that span paid search, email, web and customer events. Supporting our global sales team, marketing also develops messaging, product positioning, and tools to communicate the business value of our solutions. To establish the Communications Cloud category, marketing develops insightful thought leadership for our executives to disseminate through content marketing and keynote presentations. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 80 marketing professionals globally.

Competition

The communications software market is highly fragmented, highly competitive and rapidly evolving. Whereas we believe that our product suite provides a global end-to-end solution, other industry participants generally operate in select geographic regions or particular verticals including media monitoring and analysis or distribution. In media monitoring and analysis, industry participants include Meltwater, Kantar Media, Trendkite and iSentia. In distribution, industry participants include Business Wire, Nasdaq and The London Stock Exchange through its RNS service.

Key factors which impact competition in our industry include:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Employees and Culture

Building and maintaining a strong corporate culture benefits both our customers and our employees and serves as the foundation for the successful execution of our strategy. As a result, our corporate culture is critical for our growth strategy.

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 3,500 global employees, with approximately 1,400 employees located in the U.S. and approximately 2,100 employees located internationally. We also engage temporary employees and consultants. None of our employees in the United States are members of a union; however, approximately 500 of our foreign employees are currently subject to collective bargaining agreements and/or are members of local work councils.

We consider relations with our employees to be very good.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology and our brand. We have registered, and applied for the registration of, U.S. and international trademarks, service marks and domain names.

Additionally, we have filed U.S. patent applications covering certain of our proprietary technology and own several issued patents. We also control access to software, documentation and other proprietary information and enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with substantially all of our employees, consultants and other third parties, pursuant to which such employees, consultants and other parties assign to us the intellectual property rights that they develop and agree to keep confidential our confidential and proprietary information.

We currently license content included in our cloud-based software from several providers pursuant to data reseller, data distribution and license agreements with these providers. These agreements provide us with content such as news coverage from print and Internet news sites, as well as contact information for journalists, analysts, public officials, media outlets and publicity opportunities. The licenses for this content are non-exclusive. The agreements vary in length, and generally renew automatically subject to certain cancellation provisions available to the parties. We do not believe that any of our content providers are single source suppliers, the loss of whom would substantially affect our business.

Our business involves the supply of copyrighted works of third parties, including publishers and broadcasters, which necessitates working closely with these copyright owners on clients’ behalf. Delivering content to clients typically requires copyright fees to be paid to copyright owners. We are typically able to pass these copyright fees directly through to clients.

We also contract with content providers for the rights to access and distribute paywalled or subscription-only content. As paywalled content becomes increasingly prevalent on publisher websites, we expect to continue negotiating access rights with key content providers.

If a claim is asserted that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of a third party, we may be required to seek licenses to that technology. In addition, we license third-party technologies that are incorporated into some elements of our services. Licenses from third parties may not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, or at all. Additionally, the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property rights or proprietary technology. Competitors may also independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to the technologies we employ in our services.

Cyclicality

Demand for our products and services fluctuates from month to month, with periods of greater demand corresponding to earnings release cycles of public companies and periods of lower demand corresponding to periods in which activity in the financial markets is reduced, such as during months with fewer business days and months with more holidays, due to the transactional component of our distribution business.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Properties

Our corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois and consists of approximately 46,000 square feet of leased space. We also lease approximately 13 other offices throughout the United States and approximately 34 offices in foreign countries where we operate.

Our current facilities meet our needs for our employee base and can accommodate our currently contemplated growth.

We believe that we will be able to obtain suitable additional facilities on commercially reasonable terms to meet any future needs.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are subject to litigation incidental to our business and to governmental investigations related to our products and services. We are not currently party to any legal proceedings or investigations that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. See “Risk Factors — We are the subject of continuing litigation and governmental inquiries.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following management’s discussion and analysis together with “Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data” and our audited financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business, operations and industry that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our future results and financial condition may differ materially from those currently anticipated by us as a result of the factors described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements.” Throughout this section, unless otherwise noted “we”, “us” and the “Company” refer to Cision and its consolidated subsidiaries. Certain amounts in this section may not foot due to rounding.

Overview

We are a leading global provider of PR software, media distribution, media intelligence and related professional services, as measured by revenue estimates from Burton-Taylor International Consulting LLC. Public relations and communications professionals use our products and services to help manage, execute, and measure their strategic public relations and communications programs. We believe we are an industry standard SaaS solution for PR and marketing professionals, and are deeply embedded in industry workflow. We deliver a sophisticated, easy-to-use platform for communicators to reach relevant media influencers and craft compelling campaigns that impact customer behavior. With rich monitoring and analytics, Cision Communications Cloud (“C3”), a cloud-based platform that integrates each of our point solutions into a single unified interface, arms brands with the insights they need to link their earned media to strategic business objectives, while aligning it with owned and paid channels. This platform enables companies and brands to build consistent, meaningful and enduring relationships with influencers and buyers in order to amplify their marketplace influence. We have more than 75,000 customers and an expansive global reach, spanning most major international markets around the globe including those outside of the United States such as Canada, China, India, EMEA, and Latin America, which, in aggregate, accounted for 35% of our 2017 revenue.

The merger and formation of Cision Ltd.  On June 29, 2017, at an annual meeting of shareholders, the parties to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 19, 2017 and amended as of April 7, 2017, by and among Capitol Acquisition Corp. III, Capitol Acquisition Holding Company Ltd., renamed Cision Ltd. on June 29, 2017, Capitol Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), Canyon Holdings (Cayman), L.P. and Canyon Holdings S.à r.l. (“Cision Luxco”) (the “Merger Agreement”), consummated (a) the contribution by Cision Owner of all of its share capital and convertible preferred equity certificates in Cision Luxco in exchange for shares and warrants of Cision and (b) the merger of Merger Sub with and into Capitol with Capitol being the surviving entity in the merger (together, the “Transactions”). At the annual meeting of shareholders on June 29, 2017, holders of 490,078 shares of Capitol common stock exercised their rights to convert those shares to cash at a conversion price of approximately $10.04 per share, or an aggregate of approximately $4.9 million. The per share conversion price of approximately $10.04 for holders of public shares electing conversion was paid out of Capitol’s trust account, which had a balance immediately prior to the Closing of approximately $326.3 million.

Of the remaining funds in the trust account: (i) approximately $16.2 million was used to pay Capitol’s transaction expenses and (ii) the balance of approximately $305.2 million was released to Cision to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including to pay down $294.0 million of Cision’s second lien credit facility (the “2016 Second Lien Credit Facility”), plus a 1% fee and interest. Immediately after giving effect to the Business Combination (including as a result of the conversions described above and certain forfeitures of Capitol common stock and warrants immediately prior to the closing), there were 120,512,402 Ordinary Shares and warrants to purchase 24,375,596 Ordinary Shares of Cision issued and outstanding. Upon the closing, Capitol’s common stock, warrants and units ceased trading, and Cision’s Ordinary Shares and Warrants began trading on the NYSE and NYSE American, respectively, under the symbol “CISN” and “CISN WS” respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acquisitions and Divestitures

Since January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2018, we have made the following acquisitions and divestitures:

Acquisition of Viralheat.  On March 20, 2015, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Viralheat, Inc., a social media engagement platform for $4.5 million in cash.

Divestiture of Cision UK and Vocus UK.  On June 24, 2015, we divested certain assets of our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses for approximately $2.1 million in cash.

Acquisition of PR Newswire.  On June 16, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the assets of PRN Group, a provider of premium wire distribution services for $813.3 million in cash and the issuance of Class A LP Units of Cision Owner with a value of $40.0 million.

Divestiture of Agility.  On July 14, 2016, we divested certain assets related to our Agility business for approximately $4.3 million in cash. The Agility business was acquired in conjunction with our acquisition of PR Newswire.

Divestiture of Vintage.  On March 10, 2017, we sold substantially all of the assets of our Vintage Corporate Filings business for approximately $26.6 million and received approximately $23.7 million in cash after escrow and expenses.

Acquisition of Bulletin Intelligence.  On March 27, 2017, we acquired all of the outstanding membership interests of Bulletin Intelligence, LLC, Bulletin News Network, LLC and Bulletin News Investment, LLC, which has written the daily White House News Summary for the Executive Office of the President since 2001, and which also provides custom, expert-curated executive briefings to the CEOs and C-suites of many of the U.S.’ largest businesses, for $60.5 million in cash, issuance of 70,000 Class A LP units of Cision Owner, with a value of $5.2 million, and contingent consideration valued at $6.1 million.

Acquisition of Argus.  On June 22, 2017, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of L’Argus de la Presse, a Paris based provider of media monitoring solutions, for $6.8 million in cash paid at closing and up to $1.2 million to be paid in cash over the next four years.

Acquisition of CEDROM.  On December 19, 2017, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of CEDROM-SNi Inc., a Montréal-based firm specializing in digital media monitoring, for CAD 33.1 million. At the date of acquisition, CEDROM had over 100 employees with offices in Montréal, Québec City, Ottawa, Toronto and Paris.

Acquisition of PRIME Research.  On January 23, 2018, we acquired all of the membership interests of Prime, a leading global provider of media measurement and analysis services. The purchase price was approximately €75.7 million ($94.1 million) and consisted of approximately €53.1 million ($65.4 million) in cash consideration, the issuance of approximately 1.7 million ordinary shares valued at €16.4 million ($20.1 million), and up to €6.2 million ($8.6 million) of deferred payments due within 18 months. We have the discretion to pay up to €2.5 million ($3.1 million) of the deferred payments with ordinary shares. At the date of the acquisition, Prime had over 700 employees with offices in the Brazil, China, India, Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The results of operations of these acquired businesses and divestitures have been included in our financial statements since the applicable acquisition date or through the divestiture date. For more information regarding these transactions, see Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange.

Recent Developments

Repricing of our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility.  On February 8, 2018, we repriced our $1,417 million First Lien Credit Facility. The repriced First Lien Credit Facility consisted of a $75.0 million revolving loan facility and a $1,342 million term loan facility. The term loan facility consisted of $1,032 million of US dollar borrowings and €249 million of Euro borrowings. The term loans and revolving borrowings were repriced at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25% for US dollar borrowings and EURIBOR plus 3.50% for Euro borrowings.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sources of Revenues

We derive our revenue from subscription arrangements and related professional services in connection with our cloud based software and services offerings. We also derive revenues from news distribution services on both a subscription basis and separately from non-subscription arrangements. We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the service has been provided to the customer, the collection of the fee is probable and the amount of the fee to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.

Our separate units of accounting consist of subscription services, transactional services and professional services. The subscription services include access to our cloud-based software, hosting services, content and content updates and customer support. Our subscription agreements are typically one to three years in length and are non-cancelable, though customers have the right to terminate their agreements for cause if we materially breach our obligations under the agreement. Subscription agreements do not provide customers the right to take possession of the software at any time.

We do not charge customers an up-front fee for use of the technology. Implementation activities are insignificant and not subject to a separate fee. In certain cases, we charge annual membership fees which are recognized over the one-year membership period.

We also distribute individual news releases to thousands of distribution points on the Internet, which are then indexed by major search engines and also directly to journalists and other key constituents. Depending on the nature of the contract with the customer, we recognize revenue on a subscription basis over the term of the subscription, or on a per-transaction basis when the press releases are made available to the public.

Professional services include broadcast and webcast production. For these services, revenue is recognized when the specific performance is completed and evidence of customer acceptance is received.

When sold together, revenue from our different service offerings are accounted for separately as those services have value on a standalone basis and do not involve a significant degree of risk or unique acceptance criteria. We allocate revenue to each element in a multiple element arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor-specified objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. As we have been unable to establish VSOE or TPE for the elements of its arrangements due to factors such as a high number of varied service offerings sold on a subscription basis to differing customer concentrations as well as varied discounting practices and unobservable competitive data for similar services, we estimate selling prices by analyzing multiple factors such as historical pricing trends, customer renewal activity, and discounting practices. The volume of multiple element arrangements sold in which any element of the arrangement has a revenue attribution pattern different to the other elements was not significant for all periods presented.

Sales and other taxes collected from customers to be remitted to government authorities are excluded from revenues.

Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses

Cost of revenue.  Cost of revenue consists primarily of compensation for training, editorial and support personnel, hosting and network infrastructure costs, royalty and license fees for content, press release distribution costs, third-party contractor fees, equipment and software maintenance costs, amortization of our proprietary database and purchased technology, amortization of capitalized software development costs and depreciation associated with computer equipment and software.

Sales and marketing expenses.  Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for our sales and marketing personnel, related travel costs, sales commissions and incentives, marketing programs, promotional events, webinars and other brand building expenses.

Research and development expenses.  Our research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation for our software application development personnel and fees to third-party software development firms. Capitalized software development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the useful life of the software, which is generally two years. All other research and developmental costs are expensed as incurred.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

General and administrative expenses.  Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for general corporate functions such as executive, legal, finance, human resources and administrative personnel, as well as costs for external legal, accounting and other professional services, acquisition and other related expenses, restructuring costs, third-party payment processing and credit card fees, facilities rent and other corporate expenses.

Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation includes depreciation of property, equipment and software. Assets acquired under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized. Amortization of assets acquired under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and resulting gain or loss is recorded in the results of operations. Amortization of intangible assets consist primarily of the amortization of intangibles related to trade name, brand, and customer relationships acquired through our historical acquisitions.

Factors Impacting Our Results

Acquisitions and Dispositions

In connection with any acquisition, we are required to recognize any assets acquired and liabilities assumed measured at fair value as of that date. With respect to determining fair value, the excess of the purchase price over these allocations will be assigned to goodwill, which is not amortized for accounting purposes but is subject to testing for impairment, at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. The allocation of the purchase price of any assets acquired in an acquisition will result in increases in amortization expense relating to acquired intangible assets, because we will record the fair value of the acquired intangible assets. We amortize the intangible assets over their estimated useful lives.

Impact of Foreign Exchange Rates

We report in U.S. dollars, and the functional currency of our foreign operating subsidiaries is the local currency, including the British Pound, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the Canadian Dollar. Many of these currencies have weakened significantly against the U.S. dollar since the end of 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 35% of our revenues were generated in non-U.S. dollar-denominated currencies. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during the period for revenues and expenses. To the extent we experience significant currency fluctuations, our results of operations may be impacted.

Retention of, and Expansion Within, Our Existing Customer Base

Growth of our customer base is important to our continued revenue growth. With our recent acquisition history, we have the opportunity to expand our customer base and to use our new platforms for cross-selling opportunities. Our ability to execute on cross-selling strategies and successfully integrate our acquisitions will have an impact on our results.

Price Competition Could Affect Our Business

We face intense price competition in all areas of our business. We have in the past lowered prices, and may need to do so in the future to attempt to gain or maintain market share. Additionally, we have also been, and may once again be, required to adjust pricing to respond to actions by competitors, which could adversely impact operating results.

Investment Shift by PR Professionals from “Paid” to “Earned” Media

As the needs of PR and communications professionals have evolved, we are increasingly distributing non-press release content over our network, including multimedia, infographics, white papers and other forms of brand-created content.

Companies are progressively more focused on earned media, and we believe we are well-positioned to take advantage of this structural shift in the market. Our results will be affected as the mix of content distributed over our network evolves and PR and communications professionals focus additional spend on earned media.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Increasing Budgets for PR Departments

The switch to social channels as a company’s preferred method to interface with clients and customers has fueled the demand for PR and communications skills and solutions worldwide. PR budgets are increasing as businesses lower paid marketing budgets and leverage the shift towards earned media by actively monitoring and engaging in conversations about their products and services online. To the extent this trend continues, our results of operations will be impacted by this evolution in spending practice.

Market Adoption of Cloud-Based Knowledge Software

We are focused on expanding market awareness of our cloud-based PR solutions. Although we have seen companies adopt our solutions, we expect further growth to coincide with the rapid increase of online content and influencers and new digital media channels. In response to this trend, we have transitioned from traditional print monitoring services to cloud based solutions capable of managing the entire lifecycle of a PR campaign. To the extent this trend continues, we expect our revenues to experience growth.

Results of Operations

This section includes a summary of our historical results of operations, followed by detailed comparisons of our results for (i) the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, (ii) the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and (iii) the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. We have derived this data from our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange and any applicable prospectus supplement.

The following table shows certain income statement data in thousands of dollars and percentages for the periods indicated:

		Three months ended March 31, 2018								Three months ended March 31, 2017
Revenue		$	179,293				100.0	%		$	145,818				100.0	%
Cost of revenue			64,278				35.9	%			45,066				30.9	%
Gross profit			115,015				64.1	%			100,752				69.1	%
Operating costs and expenses:
Sales and marketing			29,679				16.6	%			27,290				18.7	%
Research and development			6,700				3.7	%			5,452				3.7	%
General and administrative			46,222				25.8	%			40,232				27.6	%
Amortization of intangible assets			20,250				11.3	%			21,011				14.4	%
Total operating costs and expenses			102,851				57.4	%			93,985				64.5	%
Operating income			12,164				6.8	%			6,767				4.6	%
Non-operating income (losses):
Foreign exchange losses			(7,883	)			(4.4	)%			(1,948	)			(1.3	)%
Interest and other income, net			(256	)			(0.1	)%			2,049				1.4	%
Interest expense			(19,688	)			(11.0	)%			(36,915	)			(25.3	)%
Loss on extinguishment of debt			(2,432	)			(1.4	)%			—				—
Total non operating loss			(30,259	)			(16.9	)%			(36,814	)			(25.2	)%
Loss before income taxes			(18,095	)			(10.1	)%			(30,047	)			(20.6	)%
Benefit from income taxes			(17,682	)			(9.9	)%			(7,054	)			(4.8	)%
Net loss		$	(413	)			(0.2	)%		$	(22,993	)			(15.8	)%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Year ended December 31, 2017								Year ended December 31, 2016								Year ended December 31, 2015
Revenue		$	631,637				100.0	%		$	467,772				100.0	%		$	333,958				100.0	%
Cost of revenue			200,836				31.8	%			162,583				34.8	%			125,006				37.4	%
Gross profit			430,801				68.2	%			305,189				65.2	%			208,952				62.6	%
Operating costs and expenses:
Sales and marketing			114,750				18.2	%			92,594				19.8	%			71,603				21.4	%
Research and development			22,102				3.5	%			19,445				4.2	%			16,604				5.0	%
General and administrative			166,759				26.4	%			135,737				29.0	%			88,448				26.5	%
Amortization of intangible assets			89,159				14.1	%			77,058				16.5	%			59,914				17.9	%
Total operating costs and expenses			392,770				62.2	%			324,834				69.4	%			236,569				70.8	%
Operating income (loss)			38,031				6.0	%			(19,645	)			(4.2	)%			(27,617	)			(8.3	)%
Non-operating income (expense):
Foreign exchange (losses) gains			(5,458	)			(0.9	)%			6,299				1.3	%			(10,886	)			(3.3	)%
Interest and other income, net			2,132				0.3	%			831				0.2	%			5,750				1.7	%
Interest expense			(116,466	)			(18.4	)%			(117,997	)			(25.2	)%			(61,398	)			(18.4	)%
Loss on extinguishment of debt			(51,872	)			(8.2	)%			(23,591	)			(5.0	)%			—				—
Total non operating loss			(171,664	)			(27.2	)%			(134,458	)			(28.7	)%			(66,534	)			(19.9	)%
Loss before income taxes			(133,633	)			(21.2	)%			(154,103	)			(32.9	)%			(94,151	)			(28.2	)%
Benefit from income taxes			(10,591	)			(1.7	)%			(55,691	)			(11.9	)%			(3,607	)			(1.1	)%
Net Loss		$	(123,042	)			(19.5	)%		$	(98,412	)			(21.0	)%		$	(90,544	)			(27.1	)%

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The measures of revenue and Adjusted EBITDA discussed herein are the measures currently utilized by management to assess performance, and we disclose these measures to investors to provide them with a meaningful understanding of our company’s performance. We are in the process of an operational, technological and financial integration effort for all recently combined businesses, particularly with respect to the acquisition of PR Newswire which was acquired in June 2016. One of our current objectives is to identify the most relevant key performance indicators to stakeholders for the fully integrated business. The determination as to when we will be able to identify these performance measures will be dependent on our ability to migrate customers from legacy platforms onto the C3 platform. When such integration and implementation is complete and such measures are available and utilized by management, these measures will be included in future disclosures to investors.

Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss, determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for the period presented, before depreciation and amortization, interest expense and loss on extinguishment of debt, and income taxes, further adjusted to exclude the following items: (a) acquisition-related costs and expenses; (b) stock-based compensation expense; (c) deferred revenue reduction from purchase accounting; (d) gains or losses related to divested businesses or assets groups; (e) sponsor fees and expenses; and (f) unrealized (gain) or loss on foreign currency translation.

We believe Adjusted EBITDA, when considered along with other performance measures, is a useful measure as it reflects certain drivers of the business, such as sales growth and operating costs. We believe Adjusted EBITDA can be useful in providing an understanding of the underlying operating results and trends and an enhanced overall understanding of our financial performance and prospects for the future. While Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized measure under U.S. GAAP, management uses this financial measure to evaluate and forecast business performance. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of liquidity or cash flows from operations or a measure comparable to net income as it does not take into account certain requirements, such as capital expenditures and related depreciation, principal and interest payments, and tax payments. Adjusted EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and our use of the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

term Adjusted EBITDA may vary from the use of similarly-titled measures by others in our industry due to the potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation and differences due to items subject to interpretation.

The presentation of non-U.S. GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Investors should read this discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto also included within.

The following table outlines the reconciliation from net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods indicated:

(in thousands)		Three months ended March 31, 2018				Three months ended March 31, 2017				Year ended December 31, 2017				Year ended December 31, 2016				Year ended December 31, 2015
Net loss		$	(413	)		$	(22,993	)		$	(123,042	)		$	(98,412	)		$	(90,544	)
Depreciation and amortization			33,277				32,592				139,474				126,983				104,038
Interest expense and loss on extinguishment of debt			22,120				36,915				168,338				141,588				61,398
Income tax benefit			(17,682	)			(7,054	)			(10,591	)			(55,691	)			(3,607	)
Acquisition and offering related costs			10,887				8,240				42,235				45,006				28,010
Stock based compensation			1,341				993				4,138				5,302				5,294
Deferred revenue reduction from purchase accounting			869				—				1,448				1,168				10,933
Gain on sale of businesses			—				(1,785	)			(1,785	)			—				(7,628	)
Sponsor fees and expenses			—				140				284				587				636
Unrealized translation loss (gain)			7,864				1,775				5,011				(4,350	)			10,359
Adjusted EBITDA		$	58,263			$	48,823			$	225,510			$	162,181			$	118,889

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Revenue

Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $33.5 million, or 23.0%, to $179.3 million. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime, a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar versus a number of foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro, and growth in our Canadian and European operations, offset by the divestiture of our Vintage business. Revenue from Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime was $31.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, a $30.7 million increase from the prior year period. Revenue from our Canadian operations, excluding CEDROM, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $1.0 million, due primarily to increased press release distribution volumes. Revenue from our European operations, excluding Argus, CEDROM, and Prime, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $4.6 million, due primarily to growth in our Nordics region and a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar versus a number of foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro. Revenue from our Vintage business for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $3.4 million. We divested our Vintage business in March 2017. The decrease in the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound, Euro, Canadian Dollar, and other foreign currencies in 2018 compared to 2017 increased revenue by approximately $4.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $19.2 million, or 42.6%, to $64.3 million. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime, and a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar versus a number of foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro, offset by a reduction in costs related to the divestiture of our Vintage business. Cost of revenue from Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime was $20.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, a $20.8 million increase from the prior year period. Cost of revenue attributed to our Vintage business for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $2.7 million. We divested our Vintage business in March 2017. The decrease in the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound, Euro, Canadian Dollar, and other foreign currencies in 2018 compared to 2017 increased our cost of revenue by approximately $1.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $2.4 million, or 8.8%, to $29.7 million. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime, and a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar versus a number of foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro, offset by a reduction in costs related to the divestiture of our Vintage business. Sales and marketing expenses from Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime were $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, a $2.9 million increase from the prior year period. Sales and marketing expenses attributed to our Vintage business for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $0.6 million. We divested our Vintage business in March 2017. The decrease in the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound, Euro, Canadian Dollar, and other foreign currencies in 2018 compared to 2017 increased our sales and marketing expenses by approximately $0.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $1.2 million, or 21.8%, to $6.7 million. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of Argus, CEDROM and Prime, and a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar versus a number of foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro, offset by a reduction in equipment and software costs of $0.4 million. Research and development expenses from Argus, CEDROM and Prime were $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, a $1.5 million increase from the prior year period. The decrease in the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound, Euro, Canadian Dollar, and other foreign currencies in 2018 compared to 2017 increased our research and development expenses by approximately $0.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $6.0 million, or 14.9%, to $46.2 million. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime, a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar versus a number of foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro, a $1.5 million increase in acquisition related expenses, and a $1.2 million increase in bad debt expense, offset by a $2.3 million reduction in compensation related expenses, a $0.5 million reduction in depreciation expense, and a reduction in costs related to the divestiture of our Vintage business. General and administrative expenses from Bulletin Intelligence, Argus, CEDROM and Prime were $6.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, a $6.0 million increase from the prior year period. General and administrative expenses attributed to our Vintage business for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $0.2 million. We divested our Vintage business in March 2017. The decrease in the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound, Euro, Canadian Dollar, and other foreign currencies in 2018 compared to 2017 increased our general and administrative expenses by approximately $1.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.

Foreign Exchange Gains (Losses)

We incurred a $7.9 million foreign exchange loss for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and a $1.9 million foreign exchange loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017 due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates that impacted the carrying value of certain intercompany notes.

Interest and Other Income, Net

We recognized $2.1 million of interest and other income, net for the three months ended March 31, 2017, which was primarily the result of a $1.8 million gain recognized on the disposal of our Vintage business.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $17.2 million, or 46.6%, from $36.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $19.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018. This decrease was primarily the result of our refinancing amendment and incremental facility amendment (the “2017 First Lien Credit Facility”) to the 2016 First Lien Credit Facility that we entered into on August 4, 2017, and the subsequent February 8, 2018 debt repricing transaction of our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility and 2017 Revolver Credit Facility that lowered interest rates on our debt. In conjunction with our refinancing amendment and incremental facility amendment, we repaid $370.0 million of our 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility and refinanced $1,175 million in debt under our 2016 First Lien Credit Facility. The debt repricing transaction lowered our LIBOR rate and EURIBOR rate with respect to the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility by 1.00% and 0.75%, respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Provision for (Benefit From) Income Taxes

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded a benefit from income taxes of $17.7 million versus a benefit from income taxes of $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The benefit from income taxes for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 is a result of using the annual effective tax rate methodology. The annual effective tax rate was impacted by unfavorable permanent differences and increases in valuation in the United States and United Kingdom. The United States permanent differences are primarily related to nondeductible transaction costs, nondeductible equity compensation and income from the Canadian subsidiaries that is taxable in the United States as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”). The United Kingdom permanent differences are primarily related to nondeductible interest expense. The increase in the valuation allowance in both countries is related to tax deferred interest expense that is not more likely than not realizable.

The benefit from income taxes for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was primarily driven by non-operating losses resulting from significant interest expense and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities relating to intangible assets.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income was $7.1 million and $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Other comprehensive income for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 was primarily due to foreign currency translation losses that resulted from a weakening of the U.S. dollar versus certain foreign currencies, primarily the British Pound and the Euro, since December 31, 2017. Other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 resulted from a weakening of the U.S. dollar versus certain foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian Dollar and the Euro, since December 31, 2016.

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

Revenue

Revenue increased $163.9 million, or 35.0%, from $467.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $631.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of PR Newswire, Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM, offset by net customer losses and the divestiture of our Vintage business. Revenue from PR Newswire, excluding Vintage, increased $145.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to the recognition of a full year of activity for 2017 versus a partial year of activity for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Aggregate revenue from the acquisitions of Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM from the acquisition date of each entity through December 31, 2017 was $44.8 million. The revenue reduction due to our Vintage business, which was divested in March 2017, was approximately $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. Revenues in our U.S. business, excluding revenue from PR Newswire, Bulletin and Vintage, declined from $199.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 to $181.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 due primarily to net customer losses, resulting in part from our increased focus on our core offerings and lower prices on certain renewed contracts resulting from price competition.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue increased $38.3 million, or 23.5%, from $162.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $200.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of PR Newswire, Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM, offset by a reduction in our personnel costs, content acquisition costs, software maintenance costs, depreciation and amortization costs, and in outside services for hosting and professional services, totaling approximately $10.7 million. Cost of revenue from PR Newswire, excluding Vintage, increased $28.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to the recognition of a full year of activity for 2017 versus a partial year of activity for the year ended December 31, 2016. Cost of revenue from the acquisitions of Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM from the acquisition date of each entity through December 31, 2017 was $27.4 million. Cost of revenue reduction attributed to our Vintage business, which was divested in March 2017, was $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses increased $22.2 million, or 23.9%, from $92.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $114.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of PR Newswire, Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM, offset by a reduction in our marketing costs that were primarily driven by a $2.3 million reduction in paid advertising costs. Sales and marketing expenses from PR Newswire, excluding Vintage, increased $20.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to the recognition of a full year of activity for 2017 versus a partial year of activity for the year ended December 31, 2016. Sales and marketing expenses from the acquisitions of Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM from the acquisition date of each entity through December 31, 2017 was $5.6 million. Sales and marketing expenses attributed to our Vintage business, which was divested in March 2017, decreased $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses increased $2.7 million, or 13.7%, from $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of PR Newswire, Argus and CEDROM, offset by a reduction in our personnel costs of $2.7 million resulting from our realization of integration cost synergies. Research and development expenses from PR Newswire increased $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to the recognition of a full year of activity for 2017 versus a partial year of activity for the year ended December 31, 2016.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses increased $31.0 million, or 22.9%, from $135.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $166.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisitions of PR Newswire, Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM, offset by a $6.0 million reduction in our acquisition-related costs, a onetime contract settlement expense of $1.9 million in 2016 and the divestiture of our Vintage business. General and administrative expenses from PR Newswire, excluding Vintage, increased $28.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to the recognition of a full year of activity for 2017 versus a partial year of activity for the year ended December 31, 2016. General and administrative expenses from the purchase of Argus, Bulletin and CEDROM from the acquisition date of each entity through December 31, 2017 was $10.8 million.

Foreign Exchange Gains (Losses)

We incurred a $5.5 million foreign exchange loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates that impacted the carrying value of certain intercompany notes. We recognized a $6.3 million foreign exchange transaction gain for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to the settlement in cash of an intercompany note involving one of our foreign subsidiaries that resulted in a $5.0 million gain.

Interest and Other Income, Net

We recognized $2.1 million of interest and other income, net for the year ended December 31, 2017, which was primarily the result of a $1.8 million gain recognized on the disposal of the Vintage business and $0.4 million in income from our earnings in an unconsolidated affiliate, offset by a $0.4 million reduction to an acquisition-related contingent liability.

Interest Expense and Loss On Extinguishment of Debt

Interest expense decreased approximately $1.5 million, or 1.3%, from $118.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $116.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This decrease was primarily driven by the refinancing of our existing first lien credit facility (the “2016 First Lien Credit Facility”) and the repayment of the 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility in August of 2017, which lowered our blended effective interest rate, and the use of cash from our merger with Capitol to lower our total outstanding debt balance, offset by a partial year of interest expense in the period ended December 31, 2016 related to the increase in our debt under the 2016 First Lien Credit Facility and the 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility (collectively, the “2016 Credit Facilities”) that we entered into in connection with our acquisition of PR

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Newswire. Our loss on extinguishment of debt increased $28.3 million, or 119.9%, from $23.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $51.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The $23.6 million loss on extinguishment of debt in 2016 was the result of our entering into the 2016 First Lien and Second Lien Credit Facilities in connection with our acquisition of PR Newswire that replaced our prior credit facilities. The $51.9 million loss on extinguishment of debt in 2017 was the result of our refinancing of the Company’s 2016 First Lien and Second Lien Credit Facilities in August of 2017.

Provision for (Benefit From) Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a benefit from income taxes of $10.6 million, equivalent to an effective tax rate of 7.9%. Our benefit from income taxes and effective tax rate is impacted by such costs as disallowed interest expense, non-deductible acquisition and initial public offering costs, and stock compensation, in addition to changes in valuation allowance and tax law changes. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded a benefit from income taxes of $55.7 million, equivalent to an effective tax rate of 36.1%.

Our effective tax rate deviates from the statutory Cayman income tax rate of 0% mainly due to the mix of foreign taxing jurisdictions in which we operate and where our foreign subsidiaries generate taxable income. In 2017, the effective tax rate decreased significantly compared to 2016 primarily due to the change in the U.S. tax law. In 2016, the effective tax rate increased significantly compared to 2015 due to the removal of the valuation allowance as a result of the PR Newswire acquisition. On December 22, 2017, the U.S. federal government enacted comprehensive tax legislation (the “Tax Act”), which significantly revises the U.S. corporate income tax law by, among other things, lowering the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, implementing a partial territorial tax system, imposing a one-time transition tax on foreign unremitted earnings, and setting limitations on deductibility of certain costs (e.g. interest expense).

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income increased $97.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 to $38.8 million, from a comprehensive loss of $58.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily the result of foreign currency translation gains that resulted from significant depreciation of the US dollar versus the British Pound that impacted the carrying value of intangibles and goodwill in our UK subsidiaries.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Revenue

Revenue increased $133.8 million, or 40.1%, from $334.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $467.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisition of PR Newswire, offset by net customer losses, resulting in part from our increased focus on bundled solutions, the divestiture of our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses, and a decline in the US dollar versus foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro.

Revenue from PR Newswire from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2016 was $165.1 million. Revenue, excluding PR Newswire, declined from $334.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 to $302.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our revenue included approximately $6.8 million, from our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses that were divested during June 2015. The decline in the US dollar versus the British Pound, the Euro, and other foreign currencies in 2016 versus 2015 reduced revenues by approximately $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Revenues in our U.S. business, excluding PR Newswire, declined from $218.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 to $199.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 due primarily to net customer losses, resulting in part from our increased focus on bundled solutions, and lowered prices on certain renewed contracts resulting from price competition.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue increased $37.6 million, or 30.1%, from $125.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $162.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisition of PR Newswire, offset by a reduction in our personnel costs resulting from our realization of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

integration cost synergies, a reduction in our content acquisition costs, a decline in the US dollar versus foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro, and the divestiture of our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses. Cost of revenue from PR Newswire from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2016 was $50.5 million. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our cost of revenue included approximately $2.0 million, from our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses that were divested during June 2015. The decline in the US dollar versus the British Pound, the Euro, and other foreign currencies in 2016 versus 2015 reduced our cost of revenue by approximately $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses increased $21.0 million, or 29.3%, from $71.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $92.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisition of PR Newswire, offset by a reduction in our sales compensation costs resulting from our realization of integration cost synergies, a reduction in our marketing costs resulting in part from the consolidation third-party contracts and reduced paid advertising costs, a decline in the US dollar versus foreign currencies, including the British Pound and the Euro, and the divestiture of our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses. Sales and marketing expenses from PR Newswire from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2016 were $28.5 million. Our sales compensation costs decreased by approximately $0.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 versus the year ended December 31, 2015. Our marketing expenses decreased by $1.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 versus the year ended December 31, 2015 due primarily to a reduction in paid advertising and other third-party marketing costs. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our sales and marketing expenses include approximately $2.4 million, from our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses that were divested during June 2015. The decline in the US dollar versus the British Pound, the Euro, and other foreign currencies in 2016 versus 2015 reduced our sales and marketing expenses by approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses increased $2.8 million, or 16.9%, from $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisition of PR Newswire, offset by a reduction in our research and development compensation costs resulting from the realization of certain planned integration synergies, and a decline in the US dollar versus foreign currencies, principally the British Pound and the Euro. Research and development expenses from PR Newswire from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2016 was $7.2 million. Our research and development compensation costs decreased by $4.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 versus the year ended December 31, 2015 due to lower overall headcount and a shift in the mix of capitalizable development work. The decline in the US dollar versus the British Pound, the Euro, and other foreign currencies in 2016 versus 2015 reduced our research and development expenses by approximately $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses increased $47.3 million, or 53.5%, from $88.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $135.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by our acquisition of PR Newswire and an increase in our acquisition-related expenses, offset by a reduction in our general and administrative personnel costs, a decline in the US dollar versus foreign currencies, including principally the British Pound and the Euro, and the divestiture of our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses. General and administrative expenses from PR Newswire from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2016 were $46.7 million. Our acquisition-related expenses increased by $13.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 versus the year ended December 31, 2015. Our general and administrative personnel costs decreased by $5.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 versus the year ended December 31, 2015 resulting from the elimination of a number of senior personnel roles that became redundant as a result of our acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our general and administrative expenses include approximately $1.6 million, from our Cision UK and Vocus UK businesses that were divested during June 2015. The decline in the US dollar versus the British Pound, the Euro, and other foreign currencies in 2016 versus 2015 reduced our general and administrative expenses by approximately $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreign Exchange Gains (Losses)

We recognized a $6.3 million foreign exchange transaction gain for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to the settlement in cash of an intercompany note involving one of our foreign subsidiaries that resulted in a $5.0 million gain.

We incurred a $10.9 million foreign exchange loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates that impacted the carrying value of certain intercompany notes.

Interest and Other Income, Net

We recognized a $4.7 million gain on the sale of our Cision UK and Vocus UK assets during the year ended December 31, 2015. No other activity was significant for all periods presented.

Interest Expense and Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

Interest expense and loss on extinguishment of debt increased $80.2 million, or 130.6%, from $61.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $141.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by the increase in our debt under the 2016 Credit Facilities that were entered into in connection with our acquisition of PR Newswire.

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes

The benefit from income taxes was $55.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 versus a benefit from income taxes of $3.6 million for the year December 31, 2015. The benefit from income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily driven by the acquisition of PR Newswire, which resulted in a reduction of valuation allowances in the U.S. group due to the establishment of deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting. The deferred tax liabilities established in purchase accounting increased goodwill rather than creating deferred tax expense. In addition, the Company determined that the deferred tax liabilities established in purchase accounting supported the realization of deferred tax assets that existed on the date of the PR Newswire acquisition that previously required a valuation allowance.

Accordingly, the Company reduced its valuation allowance and recorded a deferred tax benefit.

Other Comprehensive Loss

Other comprehensive loss increased $49.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $58.9 million, from $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily the result of foreign currency translation losses that resulted from significant depreciation of the US dollar versus the British Pound that impacted the carrying value of the intangibles and goodwill in the UK that resulted from our 2014 acquisition of Gorkana.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

We fund our business primarily with cash generated from operations and from borrowings under our credit facilities. We use cash to satisfy our contractual obligations and to fund other non-contractual business needs.

Based on the terms of our credit facilities and our current operations and expectations for continued growth, we believe that our existing cash on hand and cash generated from operating activities, together with available borrowings under our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet our current and expected operating, capital investment, acquisition financing and debt service obligations for the next twelve months, although no assurance can be given in this regard.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

While we have a history of a negative working capital position, as calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets, substantially all of this negative balance is created by deferred revenue, which does not represent a liability that will be settled in cash.

In conjunction with our June 29, 2017 merger with Capitol, the Convertible Preferred Equity Certificates (“CPECs”) held by Cision Owner were converted to equity and so are no longer presented as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2018, excluding both cash balances and deferred revenue, our current assets exceed our current liabilities by $16.7 million.

The 2017 First Lien Credit Facility requires quarterly principal repayments in the amount of $2.6 million per quarter and €0.6 million per quarter, which are insignificant compared to the cash we expect to generate from operations. The 2017 First Lien Credit Facility does not mature until 2023, and therefore is not considered to impact our liquidity needs over the next several years. We have been in compliance with all of our applicable credit facility covenants through March 31, 2018.

Our cash flow from operations in all periods to date has been adversely impacted by the cash costs incurred to execute the strategic business combinations we have made, which include acquisition fees and expenses and integration costs required to achieve synergies. Acquisition-related costs and expenses for historical periods are reflected in the Net Loss to Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation set forth under “— Operating Results.” While the execution of these strategic business combinations use short-term operating cash, they are expected to generate significant long-term cost reductions, revenue synergies and substantial incremental operating cash flow, once fully integrated. We believe that this incremental cash flow will be substantial and will enable us to fund cash interest payments.

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net cash provided by operating activities was $36.3 million, which includes the cash costs incurred to execute the strategic business combination we made during the first quarter of 2018. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, excluding the impact of the acquisition of Prime, net cash used in investing activities was $8.8 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net cash used in financing activities was $6.4 million.

We do not currently expect to declare dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration of dividends will be subject to our actual future earnings and capital requirements and to the discretion of our board of directors. Our board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions, our financial results, capital requirements, contractual, legal and regulatory restrictions and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.

Our ability to pay cash dividends on our Ordinary Shares will be subject to our continued compliance with the terms of our Credit Facilities. Under our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility, our subsidiaries have restrictions on making cash dividends to us, subject to certain exceptions, including that our subsidiaries are permitted to declare and pay cash dividends:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of March 31, 2018, we had $107.8 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand, and we had aggregate unused availability of $73.9 million under our 2017 Revolving Credit Facility. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at a variable rate and are a significant source of our liquidity. Our liquidity needs, including our funding of acquisition activities, causes the aggregate amount of outstanding borrowings under our 2017 Revolving Credit Facility to fluctuate.

Accordingly, the amount of borrowing capacity available to us can fluctuate depending on operating cash flows, debt service requirements and acquisition and investment activity.

Our future financial and operating performance, ability to service or refinance our debt and ability to comply with covenants and restrictions contained in our credit agreements governing our credit facilities will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control and will be substantially dependent on the global economy, demand for our products and solutions and our ability to successfully implement our business strategies.

As of March 31, 2018, $53.3 million of cash and cash equivalents were held outside of the United States. We have not provided for income taxes on $44.9 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, other than certain Canadian subsidiaries, as the earnings are considered permanently reinvested. Notwithstanding this, as part of the enactment of U.S. tax reform legislation, we have accrued a $5.5 million transition tax related to our Canadian subsidiaries. This amount includes an estimated $2.1 million of Canadian withholding taxes on the future repatriation of cash from Canada to the United States. In addition, the tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2018 for the United States includes an income inclusion related to the earnings of its Canadian subsidiaries as a result of the recently enacted tax reform legislation. The United States does not currently have accumulated earnings and profits and the majority of the other foreign jurisdictions can distribute their earnings to us without significant additional taxation. Accordingly, we have determined that any deferred tax liability associated with a distribution of the undistributed earnings would be immaterial.

Debt Obligations

The following describes the components of our debt obligations as of March 31, 2018. In connection with the consummation of our merger with Capitol, in July 2017, we repaid $294.0 million of our 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility, plus a 1% fee and interest. On August 4, 2017, we amended our 2016 First Lien Credit Facility and repaid in full the 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility, which is more fully discussed below.

2017 First Lien Credit Facility

On August 4, 2017, we entered into a refinancing amendment and incremental facility amendment to the 2016 First and Second Lien Credit Agreements, with Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and a syndicate of commercial lenders from time to time party thereto. The 2017 First Lien Credit Facility provided for a tranche of refinancing term loans which refinanced the term loans under our 2016 First Lien Credit Agreement in full and provided for additional term loans of $131.2 million. The 2017 First Lien Credit Facility, on the date of effectiveness, consisted of: (i) a revolving loan facility, which permits borrowings and letters of credit of up to $75.0 million, of which up to $25.0 million may be used or issued as standby and trade letters of credit; (ii) a $960.0 million Dollar-denominated term credit facility (the “2017 First Lien Dollar Term Credit Facility”) and (iii) a €250.0 million Euro-denominated term credit facility (the “2017 First Lien Euro Term Credit Facility”). We used the proceeds from the 2017 First Lien Term Credit Facility to repay all amounts then outstanding under our 2016 First Lien Credit Facility and all amounts outstanding under our 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility and pay all related fees and expenses. We retained remaining cash for general corporate purposes. We terminated the agreement governing the 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility in connection with effecting the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility.

On December 14, 2017, we entered into an incremental facility amendment to the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility. The Incremental Amendment provided for an incremental $75.0 million dollar-denominated term loan facility. The proceeds from the Incremental Facility were used to fund the Prime acquisition. As of March 31, 2018, we had no outstanding borrowings and $1.1 million of outstanding letters of credit under our 2017 Revolving Credit Facility and $1,336.3 million outstanding under the 2017 First Lien Term Credit Facility.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On February 8, 2018, we repriced our $1,417 million First Lien Credit Facility (the “Repricing”). The repriced first lien credit agreement consisted of a $75.0 million revolving loan facility and a $1,342 million term loan facility. The term loan facility consisted of $1,032 million of U.S. dollar borrowings and €249 million of Euro borrowings. The term loans and revolving borrowings were repriced at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25% for dollar borrowings and EURIBOR plus 3.50% for Euro borrowings.

From time to time, we may incur incremental revolving facilities and incremental term loan facilities under the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility in amounts not to exceed $100.0 million plus additional amounts subject to compliance with certain leverage ratios as set forth in the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility and certain other amounts.

Interest is charged on U.S. dollar borrowings under our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility, at our option, at a rate based on (1) the adjusted LIBOR (a rate equal to the London interbank offered rate adjusted for statutory reserves) or (2) the alternate base rate (a rate that is highest of the (i) Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch’s prime lending rate, (ii) the overnight federal funds rate plus 50 basis points or (iii) the one-month adjusted LIBOR plus 1%), in each case, plus an applicable margin.

Following the Repricing, the margin applicable to U.S. dollar loans under the 2017 First Lien Dollar Term Credit Facility bearing interest at the alternate base rate is 2.25%; the margin applicable to loans under the 2017 First Lien Dollar Term Credit Facility bearing interest at the adjusted LIBOR is 3.25%.

Interest is charged on Euro borrowings under our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility at a rate based on the adjusted EURIBOR (a rate equal to the Euro interbank offered rate adjusted for statutory reserves), plus an applicable margin. Following the Repricing, the margin applicable to loans under the 2017 First Lien Euro Term Credit Facility bearing interest at the adjusted LIBOR is 3.50%.

Revolving borrowings in Canadian dollars bear interest at the adjusted Canadian dollar banker’s acceptance rate plus an applicable margin. Following the Repricing, the margin applicable to loans under the 2017 Revolving Credit Facility bearing interest at the alternate base rate, the adjusted LIBOR, and the adjusted Euro interbank offered rate bear interest at rates of 2.25%, 3.25%, and 3.50%, respectively. As of March 31, 2018, the applicable interest rate under the 2017 First Lien Dollar Term Credit Facility and the 2017 First Lien Euro Term Credit Facility was 5.13% and 3.50%, respectively.

We are obligated to make quarterly principal payments under the 2017 First Lien Dollar Term Credit Facility of $2.6 million (which amount may be reduced by the application of voluntary and mandatory prepayments pursuant to the terms of the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility), with the remaining balance due June 16, 2023. We are obligated to make quarterly principal payments under the 2017 First Lien Euro Term Credit Facility of €0.6 million (which amount may be reduced by the application of voluntary and mandatory prepayments pursuant to the terms of the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility), with the remaining balance due June 16, 2023. The maturity date of the 2017 Revolving Credit Facility is June 16, 2022.

We may also be required to make certain mandatory prepayments of the 2017 First Lien Term Credit Facility out of excess cash flow and upon the receipt of proceeds of asset sales and certain insurance proceeds (in each case, subject to certain minimum dollar thresholds and rights to reinvest the proceeds as set forth in the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility). For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, no mandatory prepayments were due pursuant to the terms of the 2017 First Lien Term Credit Facility.

The obligations under the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of Canyon Companies S.à.r.l. and each of its subsidiaries organized in the United States (or any state thereof), the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Ireland, subject to certain exceptions.

The 2017 First Lien Credit Facility includes a springing financial covenant applicable solely to the 2017 Revolving Credit Facility that is tested at such time that 35% or more (excluding letters of credit that have been cash collateralized and letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $4.0 million) of the aggregate commitments under the 2017 Revolving Credit Facility is drawn and outstanding. Such springing financial covenant requires that, as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, the total net leverage ratio of Canyon Companies S.à.r.l. and its restricted subsidiaries under the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility cannot exceed the applicable ratio set forth in the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility for such quarter (subject to certain rights to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

cure any failure to meet such ratio as set forth in the 2017 First Lien Credit Facility). The 2017 First Lien Credit Facility is also subject to certain customary affirmative covenants and negative covenants. Under our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility, our subsidiaries have restrictions on making cash dividends to us, subject to certain exceptions, including that our subsidiaries are permitted to declare and pay cash dividends:

Our 2017 First Lien Credit Facility provides that an event of default will occur upon specified change of control events.

“Change in Control” is defined to include, among other things, the acquisition of ownership, directly or indirectly, beneficially or of record, by any person or group, other than certain permitted holders (directly or indirectly, including through one or more holding companies), of voting equity interests representing 50% or more of the aggregate ordinary voting power represented by the issued and outstanding voting equity in Cision Ltd.

Cash Flow Analysis

The following tables reflect the changes in cash flows for the comparative periods presented.

		Three months ended March 31,								Year ended December 31,
(in thousands)		2018				2017				2017				2016				2015
Net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities		$	36,303			$	12,838			$	68,848			$	17,373			$	22,422
Investing activities			(71,485	)			(32,993	)			(79,988	)			(819,416	)			(10,664	)
Financing activities			(6,366	)			26,009				121,945				808,353				(8,568	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			742				341				2,714				(1,781	)			(1,161	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		$	(40,806	)		$	6,195			$	113,519			$	4,529			$	2,029

Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities consist of net income (loss) adjusted for non-cash items, such as: depreciation and amortization of property and equipment and intangible assets, non-cash interest charges, deferred income taxes, equity-based compensation and for changes in net working capital assets and liabilities. The impact of changes in deferred income taxes primarily relates to temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $23.5 million to $36.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, from net cash provided by operating activities of $12.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2018 reflects a $20.9 million increase in deferred revenue due to the timing of invoicing to our subscription customers, a

TABLE OF CONTENTS

$6.8 million increase in accounts receivable due to the timing of customer invoicing, a $3.0 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily due to the timing of advance payments for business expenses, and a $3.3 million decrease in other accrued expenses due to the timing of vendor invoices.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 reflects a $9.7 million increase in deferred revenue due to the timing of invoicing to our subscription customers, an $8.6 million decrease in accrued compensation and benefits due to the timing of payment of annual bonuses, and a negative deferred income tax impact of $7.9 million due to a deferred tax benefit included within our tax provision.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $68.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflects operating profit of $38.0 million, adjusted for non-cash items and a $4.9 million increase in deferred revenue due to the timing of invoicing to our subscription customers, a $6.2 million decrease in accrued compensation and benefits due to the timing of payment of annual bonuses, and a $4.0 million decrease in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $17.4 million, which reflects a $7.4 million decrease in deferred revenue due to the timing of invoicing to our subscription customers, an $8.2 million increase in accrued compensation and benefits due to the timing of payment of annual bonuses, an increase in accounts receivable of $1.6 million due to the timing of cash collections from customers and a $4.2 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $22.4 million, which reflects a $5.3 million decrease in deferred revenue due to the timing of invoicing to our subscription customers, a $3.9 million decrease in accrued compensation and benefits due to the timing of payment of annual bonuses, and a $3.7 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets.

Cash Flow Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $71.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, which reflects $62.7 million used for our acquisition of Prime, net of cash acquired. Net cash used in investing activities in the first quarter of 2018 reflects capitalized software development costs of $5.0 million and purchases of property plant and equipment of $3.7 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $33.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 included $49.1 million in cash, net of cash acquired, used for our acquisition of Bulletin Intelligence and reflects capitalized software development costs of $4.1 million and purchases of property and equipment of $3.5 million, offset by approximately $23.7 million in cash we received for the sale of Vintage, after funds deposited in escrow and transaction expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities was $80.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 which reflects $78.5 million used for our acquisitions of Bulletin Intelligence, Argus and CEDROM, net of cash acquired. Net cash used in investing activities in 2017 also reflects capitalized software development costs of $15.0 million and purchases of property and equipment of $10.7 million, offset by approximately $23.7 million in cash we received for the sale of Vintage, after funds deposited in escrow and transaction expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $819.4 million, which reflects the acquisition of PR Newswire in June 2016 for $804.2 million in cash, net of cash acquired and other consideration, capitalized software development costs of $11.7 million, purchases of property and equipment of $7.4 million, and proceeds from the sale of Agility PR of $4.0 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $10.7 million. This decrease was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Viralheat for $4.5 million, capitalized software development costs of $11.3 million, purchases of property and equipment of $5.2 million, offset by an increase in restricted cash changes of $8.3 million and $2.0 million of proceeds from the disposal of net assets of Cision UK Limited and Vocus UK Limited.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cash Flow Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 which reflects $3.4 million in repayments of our term loan facility, $0.1 million in deferred financing payments, and contingent consideration payments of $2.9 million related to the Bulletin Intelligence earnout agreement.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $26.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, which reflects $2.8 million in repayments of our term loan facility offset by borrowings under our term loan facility of $28.9 million used to fund our acquisition of Bulletin Intelligence.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $121.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 which reflects net repayments of the revolving credit facility of $33.5 million, net repayments on the credit facility of $147.6 million, and $305.1 million in proceeds from the issuance of equity in connection with our merger with Capitol, offset by the $1.9 million payment due to Cision Owner.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $808.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 which reflects net proceeds from the revolving credit facility of $33.5 million, proceeds from the issuance of CPECs to Cision Owner of $136.0 million to fund our acquisition of PR Newswire in June of 2016.

Net cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2015 was $8.6 million, which reflects $2.4 million from the acquisition of a non-controlling interest, net repayments under our term credit facility of $5.9 million and repayments on our capital lease obligations of $0.3 million.

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commitments for the periods indicated as of December 31, 2017.

Contractual obligations(1) (in thousands)		Payments due by period
		Total				Less than 1 year				1 to 3 years				3 to 5 years				More than 5 years
2017 First Lien Credit Facility(2)		$	1,331,611			$	13,349			$	26,698			$	26,698			$	1,264,866
Operating Leases			86,160				16,265				28,183				20,162				21,550
Purchase Obligations(3)			9,611				7,104				2,507				—				—
Cash interest(4)			432,874				74,054				145,880				142,686				70,254

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet transactions or interests.

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Our critical accounting policies are described below.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Internal Use Software Development Costs

We incur software development costs related to its internal use software. Qualifying costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized. These costs primarily consist of internal labor and third-party development costs and are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, which is generally two years. All other research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Costs to maintain and update the information database are expensed within cost of revenues as these expenses are incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded amortization expense related to internal use software of $12.4 million, $12.6 million and $6.9 million, respectively.

Property, Equipment and Purchased Software

Property, equipment and purchased software are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: three to five years for software and computer and office equipment and five to seven years for furniture and fixtures. Assets acquired under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms of the leases. Amortization of assets acquired under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense. Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recorded in the statements of net loss and total comprehensive loss.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets include property, equipment and software and intangible assets with finite lives. Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, trade names and purchased technology acquired in business combinations. Intangible assets are amortized using the accelerated method, which approximates the pattern of usage of the economic benefit of the asset, over their estimated useful lives ranging from two to twelve years. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If an impairment indicator is present, we evaluate recoverability by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If the assets are impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. There were no significant impairment charges for long-lived assets for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.

We regularly revisit our estimate of useful economic lives of long-lived assets and makes adjustments to those lives where appropriate.

Business Combinations and Valuation of Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets

We have completed a number of acquisitions of businesses during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 that have resulted in the recording of goodwill and identifiable definite-lived intangible assets. We recognize all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values on the acquisition date. We use significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the acquisition date using the income and cost approaches (or a combination thereof). Fair values are determined based on Level 3 inputs, including estimated future cash flows, discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections, customer retention rates and terminal values, all of which require significant management judgement. We refine these estimates that are provisional, as necessary, during the measurement period. The measurement period is the period after the acquisition date, not to exceed one year, in which new information may be gathered about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date to adjust the provisional amounts recognized. Adjustments to assets and liabilities within the measurement period adjustments are recorded with a corresponding offset to goodwill. All other adjustments, including those after the conclusion of the measurement period, are recorded to the consolidated statements of net loss and comprehensive loss and to date have been immaterial. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred separately from the acquisition and are included in general and administrative expenses in the statements of net loss and total comprehensive loss.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Goodwill Impairment

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is assessed for impairment at least annually. We perform our annual impairment assessment on October 1, or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. On October 1, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we performed our annual goodwill impairment test based on the fair value of our reporting units. When assessing goodwill for impairment, we use an income approach based on discounted cash flows to determine the fair value of each reporting unit. Our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue, operating costs and other relevant factors which are consistent with the plans used to manage our operations.

The results of the annual goodwill impairment test performed on October 1, 2017 indicated that the estimated fair value of each reporting unit was, in all cases, at least 40% in excess of its carrying value. We concluded that the fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded its carrying amount and no impairment charge was recorded.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

Employees of CNW Group Ltd. (“CNW”) participate in a defined benefit pension plan whereby pension expense is determined based on a number of actuarial assumptions, which are reviewed on an annual basis. The defined benefit plan has been closed to new participants since 2006. The employees and accompanying pension plan were inherited with the acquisition of PR Newswire on June 16, 2016. The purchase price of PR Newswire was allocated to the assets and obligations of the pension plan based on fair value at the acquisition date. These actuarial assumptions include discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets, rate of salary increases and other factors.

The December 31, 2017 discount rate was based on bond yields as at December 15, 2017 and derived from the Mercer discount rate model. The Mercer discount rate model is based on actual AA corporate bond yield data for short term yields and extrapolated data for longer terms for which discount rates for sample plans of various durations are determined. The duration of pension plans’ obligations is calculated and the corresponding discount rate for that duration is obtained. The resulting discount rate is rounded to the nearest 10 basis points.

The expected rate of return on plan assets is based the median simulated investment return using estimated returns for each major asset class consistent with market conditions on the valuation date, the expected time horizon over which benefits are expected to be paid, and the target asset mix specified in the Plan’s investment policy. The expected rate of return also uses an implicit provision for expenses determined as the average rate of investment expenses paid from the fund in the recent past.

The unfunded status of the plan is recognized as a long-term liability in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, which is also the measurement date for the defined benefit pension plan for the CNW employees. For further information, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The actual and expected return on plan assets for 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

		2017				2016
Discount Rate			3.5	%			4.1	%
Rate of compensation increase			3.5	%			3.5	%
Expected return on plan assets			2.0	%			2.0	%

Revenue Recognition

We derive our revenues from subscription arrangements and related professional services in connection with our cloud based software and services offerings. We also derive revenues from news distribution services on both a subscription basis and separately from non-subscription arrangements. We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the service has been provided to the customer, the collection of the fee is probable and the amount of the fee to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.

Our separate units of accounting consist of subscription services, transactional services and professional services. The subscription services include access to our cloud-based software, hosting services, content and content updates and customer support. Our subscription agreements are typically one to three years in length

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and are non-cancelable, though customers have the right to terminate their agreements for cause if we materially breach our obligations under the agreement. Subscription agreements do not provide customers the right to take possession of the software at any time.

We do not charge customers an up-front fee for use of the technology. Implementation activities are insignificant and are not subject to a separate fee. In certain cases, we charge annual membership fees to customers which are recognized ratably over the one-year membership period.

We also distribute individual news releases to thousands of distribution points on the Internet, which are then indexed by major search engines and also directly to journalists and other key constituents. Dependent on the nature of the contract with the customer, we recognize revenue on subscription basis over the term of the subscription, or on a per-transaction basis when the press releases are made available to the public.

Professional services include broadcast and webcast production. For these services, revenue is recognized when the specific performance is completed and customer acceptance received.

When sold together, revenue from our different service offerings are accounted for separately as those services have value on a standalone basis and do not involve a significant degree of risk or unique acceptance criteria. We allocate revenue to each element in a multiple element arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its VSOE, if available, TPE, if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. As we have been unable to establish VSOE or TPE for the elements of its arrangements due to factors such as a high number of varied service offerings sold on a subscription basis to differing customer concentrations as well as varied discounting practices and unobservable competitive data for similar services, we estimate selling prices by analyzing multiple factors such as historical pricing trends, customer renewed activity, and discounting practices. The volume of multiple element arrangements sold by us in which any element of the arrangement has a revenue attribution pattern different to the other elements was not significant for all years presented.

Sales and other taxes collected from customers to be remitted to government authorities are excluded from revenues.

Equity-Based Compensation

We recognize equity-based compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally four years from the date of grant. As equity-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, such expense is reduced for estimated forfeitures.

Segments

We have determined that our Chief Executive Officer is the Chief Operating Decision Maker. Our Chief Executive Officer reviews financial information presented on both a consolidated basis and on a geographic regional basis. Since our inception, we have completed several significant acquisitions and have expended significant efforts in integrating these acquisitions into a single commercial software solution, available to all customers in all geographies. As a result of the long term qualitative and quantitative similar economic characteristics exhibited by the sale of a single product suite in all of our regions, we have determined that our operating segments meet the criteria to be aggregated into one reportable segment.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for deductible temporary differences between the respective reported amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating loss and tax-credit carryforwards. Net deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Our estimates related to liabilities for uncertain tax positions require us to make judgments regarding the sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits. If we determine it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits, we record the impact of the position in our consolidated financial statements at the largest amount that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The estimates are updated at each reporting date based on the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

facts, circumstances and information available. We are also required to assess at each reporting date whether it is reasonably possible that any significant increases or decreases to its unrecognized tax benefits will occur during the next twelve months. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdictions and various state and foreign jurisdictions and are subject to U.S. federal, state, and foreign tax examinations for years ranging from 2011 to 2016.

The recently enacted Tax Act contains several key tax provisions that affected us, including a reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% effective January 1, 2018, among others. We are required to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment, such as re-measuring our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities. In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which allows us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year of the enactment date. Since the Tax Act was passed late in the fourth quarter of 2017, and ongoing guidance and accounting interpretation are expected over the next 12 months, we consider the accounting of the deferred tax remeasurements, and other items to be incomplete. We expect to complete our analysis within the measurement period in accordance with SAB 118.

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows, including the presentation of debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs as cash outflows for financing activities on the statement of cash flows. The standard was to become effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019; however, we elected to early adopt on a retrospective basis on July 1, 2017, resulting in classifying $19.4 million in payments of original issue discount upon debt extinguishment as a repayment of term loan facility, a financing outflow, as opposed to the prior treatment which was to classify these as an operating cash outflow on our consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The resulting change increased cash provided by operating activities to $17.4 million and decreased cash provided by financing activities to $808.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09, which amends several aspects of accounting for employee share-based payment transactions including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. We elected to early adopt this guidance on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2018. We have also elected to continue our historical accounting practice of estimating forfeitures in determining the amount of stock-based compensation expense to recognize, rather than accounting for forfeitures as they occur. Therefore, the adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendments of ASU No. 2016-16 were issued to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Current GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party which has resulted in diversity in practice and increased complexity within financial reporting. The amendments of this ASU would require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs and do not require new disclosure requirements. We elected to early adopt ASU 2016-16 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and applied the guidance on a modified retrospective basis and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the amount of $1.1 million.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). The ASU eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires determining the fair value of assets acquired or liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under the amendments in this update, a goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We elected to early adopt ASU 2017-04 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and it did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. An entity will account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value of the modified award is the same as the original award, the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the original award and the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or liability instrument is the same as the original award. We adopted ASU 2017-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and it did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Topic 606 supersedes existing revenue recognition requirements in ASU Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and requires the recognition of revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The accounting for the recognition of costs related to obtaining customer contracts under Topic 606 is significantly different than current guidance, and Topic 606 will likely result in sales commissions and certain other costs capitalized, which will then be amortized over an estimated customer life. We will adopt this ASU effective for our fiscal year 2019 and using the permitted modified retrospective transition method. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which will allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for the tax effects resulting from “An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018” (the “Act”) that are stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income. This ASU also requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects; however, it does not change the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations. This ASU is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. It must be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Act is recognized. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. This ASU is effective for our fiscal year 2019 and interim periods within that year. We do not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force), which requires restricted cash to be presented with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows and disclosure of how the statement of cash flows reconciles to the balance sheet if restricted cash is shown separately from cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet. This ASU is effective for our fiscal year 2019, with early adoption permitted. We do not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requires expanded disclosures about leasing arrangements. This ASU is effective for our fiscal year 2020 and interim periods within 2021, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This change primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value options and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. This ASU is effective for our fiscal year 2019, with early adoption permitted for certain provisions for the new guidance. We do not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Seasonality

We have experienced in the past, and expect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in our revenues as a result of press release cycles, primarily related to the release of public company operating results and other corporate news events.

Effects of Inflation

While inflation may impact revenues and cost of services, the Company believes the effects of inflation, if any, on the results of operations and financial condition have not been significant. However, there can be no assurance that the results of operations and financial condition will not be materially impacted by inflation in the future.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks include interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Our Credit Facilities bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a fixed margin. As of March 31, 2018, we had $1,336 million in outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facilities. At LIBOR rates below 3.0%, 100.0% of our outstanding borrowings bear interest at variable rates. Outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facilities are subject to a 1% LIBOR floor. As of March 31, 2018, the 1-month LIBOR rate was approximately 1.9%. A hypothetical 1% increase in the interest rate on our indebtedness as of March 31, 2018 would have increased our cash interest expense by approximately $13.4 million per annum.

Foreign Exchange Risk

The reporting currency for all periods presented is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency for our foreign operating subsidiaries is the local currency, including the British Pound, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the Canadian Dollar.

These currencies all weakened significantly against the U.S. dollar. Approximately 35% of our revenues are generated in non-U.S. dollar-denominated currencies. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during the period for revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2018. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives. Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all errors and fraud. A control system, irrespective of how well it is designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance and cannot guarantee that it will succeed in its stated objectives.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the material weakness identified below.

As of March 31, 2018, our management has concluded that we did not maintain effective controls over the preparation and review of the income tax benefit and related current and deferred income tax accounts. Specifically, a deficiency in the design of our controls did not ensure that the information used to prepare the income tax benefit and related current and deferred income tax accounts was complete and accurate. This material weakness did not result in a material misstatement to our financial statements or disclosures, but did result in out-of-period adjustments in our benefit for income taxes and deferred tax liabilities that were individually, and in the aggregate, immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2017. We have determined that the deficiency could result in a misstatement of the benefit for income taxes and current and deferred income tax accounts that would result in a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that this control deficiency represents a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2018.

In response to the material weakness, we have developed a plan for remediation that consists of the following elements:

The identified material weakness in internal control will not be considered fully remediated until these internal controls enhancements have been in operation for a sufficient period of time for our management to conclude that the material weakness has been fully remediated.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT

Information about Executive Officers and Directors

The board of directors and executive officers of Cision is as follows:

Name		Age		Position
Kevin Akeroyd		50		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jack Pearlstein		54		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Whitney Benner		44		Chief Human Resources Officer
Yujie Chen		48		President, Asia-Pacific
Robert Coppola		47		Chief Information Officer
Jason Edelboim		42		President, Americas
Chris Lynch		34		Chief Marketing Officer
Rainer Mathes		64		President, Cision Insights
Abe Smith		48		President, EMEA
Steve Solomon		54		Chief Accounting Officer
Mark M. Anderson(2)(3)		43		Director and Chairman of the Board
Philip A. Canfield(3)		50		Director
L. Dyson Dryden(1)(2)		42		Director
Mark D. Ein(1)(3)		53		Director and Vice-Chairman of the Board
Stephen P. Master(2)		34		Director
Stuart Yarbrough(1)		67		Director

Executive Officers

Kevin Akeroyd.  Mr. Akeroyd has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since August 2016. Mr. Akeroyd has over 25 years of experience in digital, social and mobile marketing globally. Previously, Mr. Akeroyd was General Manager and Senior Vice President at Oracle Marketing Cloud from September 2013 to August 2016. Mr. Akeroyd and Oracle created and led the Enterprise Marketing Platform category. Prior to Oracle, he held senior leadership positions at Badgeville from September 2011 to September 2013, Salesforce.com (Jigsaw/Data.com) from September 2007 to August 2011. Mr. Akeroyd holds a degree from the University of Washington, Michael G. Foster School of Business and attended the EPSO program at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.

Jack Pearlstein.  Mr. Pearlstein has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2014. Previously, from June 2009 to November 2013, he was Chief Financial Officer of Six3 Systems, Inc., a leading provider of software development, sensor development and signal processing services to the U.S. intelligence community. As a Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Pearlstein has led three different companies through their initial public offerings: AppNet from May 1999 to September 2000, DigitalNet from September 2001 to November 2004 and Solera from April 2006 to March 2009. Mr. Pearlstein is a CPA and received his Bachelor of Science in accounting from New York University. He also holds an MBA in finance from The George Washington University.

Whitney Benner.  Ms. Benner has served as our Chief Human Resources Officer since June 2016. Ms. Benner is responsible for developing and executing human resources strategy in support of the overall business plan and strategic direction of the organization, specifically in the areas of succession planning, talent management, change management, organizational and performance management, training and development, and compensation. From June 2013 to June 2016, she was Senior Vice President of Human Resources for PR Newswire, where she set and implemented human resource strategy in support of the company’s overall business objectives. Before Ms. Benner joined PR Newswire, she held human resources leadership roles at Medialink and MJI Broadcasting. Ms. Benner holds a Bachelor’s degree from Skidmore College.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Yujie Chen.  Mr. Chen has served as our Asia Pacific President since June 2016. Mr. Chen joined PR Newswire in November 2003 and was promoted from Managing Director (China) to head PR Newswire’s business for the entire Asia-Pacific region in June 2013. Prior to PR Newswire, Mr. Chen worked in a number of media and publishing industry roles, including with CNBC Asia from June 2003 to November 2003, Deluxe Global Media from September 2001 to June 2003 and Beijing Television from February 1996 to August 1999. Chen holds an MBA degree from the Anderson School of Management at UCLA.

Robert Coppola.  Mr. Coppola has served as our Chief Information Officer since July 2016. Mr. Coppola spent four years from June 2011 to September 2015 with McGraw-Hill Financial as the Chief Information and Technology Officer for S&P Capital IQ and S&P Dow Jones Indices, a leading provider of ratings, benchmarking and analytics in the global capital and commodity markets. There, he was responsible for driving the overarching technology strategy, architecture and development in addition to evolving multiple silo-based teams into one global operating team. He has also held leadership positions with Thomson Reuters from November 2003 to June 2011 and Bloomberg LP from September 1992 to November 2003. Mr. Coppola holds a Bachelor’s in Economics from Rutgers University.

Jason Edelboim.  Mr. Edelboim has served as our President of the Americas since December 2016. Mr. Edelboim was named President of PR Newswire in June 2016, and prior to that was a Senior Vice President at PR Newswire from June 2013 to June 2016. Mr. Edelboim has over 15 years of experience at the intersection of media and technology. He previously worked at Bloomberg LP from 2003 to 2009 where he held progressing leadership roles within the company’s Media Group. Mr. Edelboim holds an MBA from the Stern School of Business at New York University and a BA from Columbia University.

Chris Lynch.  Mr. Lynch has served as our Chief Marketing Officer since November 2016. Mr. Lynch is responsible for our global marketing strategy, which includes communications, product and digital marketing. From January 2014 to October 2016, he ran product marketing and go-to-market strategy for Oracle’s Marketing Cloud business and also held leadership positions at Badgeville from February 2012 to January 2014 and TIBCO from June 2011 to January 2012. Mr. Lynch attended Northeastern University where he received his Bachelor of Arts in Journalism.

Rainer Mathes.  Dr. Mathes has served as President of Cision Insights since January 2018. Cision Insights is dedicated to evaluating companywide campaign effectiveness through customized intelligence, reporting and industry expertise. Dr. Mathes founded PRIME Research in 1988 while holding research positions at the Institute of Media Studies at the University of Mainz and later at the Research Center for Surveys and Methodology in Mannheim. Dr. Mathes developed Prime into a global research organization with locations in Europe, the United States and Asia. Dr. Mathes was educated at the University of Mainz where he first finished his M.A. in Political Science, Communication Science and Linguistics in 1980 before achieving his Ph. D. in Political Science in 1986 and receiving the ‘Johannes Gutenberg Award’ in the same year.

Abe Smith.  Mr. Smith has served as our President of EMEA since September 2017. Mr. Smith has spent the past 17 years with U.S.-based high growth, enterprise SaaS companies focusing on market transformation. Previously, Mr. Smith was Group Vice President of Emerging Markets for Oracle from June 2014 to August 2017. Prior to Oracle, Mr. Smith held senior leadership roles at Badgeville from September 2012 to May 2014 and Mindjet from June 2009 to August 2012. Additionally, from January 2007 to June 2009, Mr. Smith led the Emerging Markets for Cisco in the Unified Communications and Collaboration Group (WebEx). Mr. Smith graduated summa cum laude from the University of Massachusetts Amherst with a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science.

Steve Solomon.  Mr. Solomon has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since June 2014. From June 2009 to June 2014, he was Corporate Controller of Six3 Systems, Inc., a leading provider of software development, sensor development and signal processing services to the US intelligence community. As a Corporate Controller, Mr. Solomon was at DigitalNet from October 2001 to January 2005 and helped the company through their initial public offering. Mr. Solomon is a CPA and received his Bachelor of Science in accounting from the University of Maryland.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Non-Employee Directors

Mark M. Anderson.  Mr. Anderson joined GTCR in 2000 and is currently a Managing Director of the firm. He previously worked at Gracie Capital and at Bowles Hollowell Conner & Co. He holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a BS from the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia. Mr. Anderson currently is a Director of Cision, Global Traffic Network, Beeline, Lytx, Rural Broadband Investments and XIFIN. In addition, Mr. Anderson was previously a Director of GTCR’s past investments including CAMP Systems, Land Lease Group and Landmark Aviation, and was instrumental in other GTCR investments including Skylight Financial, Solera and Transaction Network Services. Mr. Anderson serves on the board of the Chicago Foundation for Education, a non-profit organization that seeks to improve the educational experience of Chicago’s public school children.

We determined that Mr. Anderson’s directorship experience and experience advising similar companies qualifies him to serve as a director on Cision’s board of directors.

Philip A. Canfield.  Mr. Canfield is a Managing Director of private equity firm GTCR LLC and currently co-heads GTCR’s Technology, Media and Telecommunications investment team. Mr. Canfield joined GTCR in 1992 and became a Principal in 1997. From 1990 to 1992, Mr. Canfield worked in the Corporate Finance Department at Kidder, Peabody and Company. Mr. Canfield has served as a Director of Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. since July 2012 and is the Chairman of its Nominating & Governance Committee. Mr. Canfield currently serves on several private company boards. He holds an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago and a B.B.A. in finance with High Honors from the Honors Business Program at the University of Texas.

We determined that Mr. Canfield’s extensive experience in corporate finance and in the telecommunications industry qualifies him to serve as a director on Cision’s board of directors.

L. Dyson Dryden.  Mr. Dryden is currently the President, Chief Financial Officer, and a Director of Capitol Investment Corp. IV, a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting a business combination with another company. From July 2015 until it completed its business combination in June 2017, Mr. Dryden was the President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and a Director of Capitol Acquisition Corp. III. Since the closing of the business combination, Mr. Dryden has continued to serve as a director of Capitol Acquisition Corp. III (now known as Cision Ltd.). From March 2013 to July 2015, Mr. Dryden served as the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Capitol II. Mr. Dryden has continued to serve as a director of Lindblad Expeditions since the closing of its business combination. Mr. Dryden is also the founder of Dryden Capital Management, LLC, a private investment firm that invests in and builds private companies, and has served as its President since March 2013. Mr. Dryden has also been Vice Chairman of CDS Logistics Management, Inc., one of the largest providers of home improvement product delivery services in the United States, since 2009. From August 2005 to February 2013, Mr. Dryden worked in Citigroup’s Investment Banking division in New York, most recently as a Managing Director where he led the coverage effort for a number of the firm’s Global Technology, Media and Telecommunications clients. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Dryden held the titles of Associate and Vice President at Jefferies & Company, a middle market investment banking firm. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Dryden worked in the investment banking group at BB&T Corporation. Mr. Dryden holds a B.S. in Business Administration with a dual concentration in finance and management from the University of Richmond.

We determined that Mr. Dryden’s corporate finance and public company experience qualifies him to serve as a director on Cision’s board of directors.

Mark D. Ein.  Mr. Ein currently is currently the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Capitol Investment Corp. IV, a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting a business combination with another company. Mr. Ein is an investor, entrepreneur and philanthropist, who has created, acquired, invested in and built a series of growth companies across a diverse set of industries over the course of his 25-year career. From July 2015 until June 2017, Mr. Ein was the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director of Capitol III Acquisition Corp. III. Since the closing of the business combination, Mr. Ein has continued to serve as a director of Capitol Acquisition Corp. III (now known as Cision Ltd.). From August 2010 to July 2015, Mr. Ein was the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Capitol II. Capitol II completed its business combination with Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. in July 2015. Since the closing of the business combination, Mr. Ein has continued to serve as the Chairman of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the Board of Capitol II (and now post-merger Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.). From June 2007 to October 2009, Mr. Ein was the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Capitol I. Capitol I completed its business combination with Two Harbors Investment Corp., a Maryland real estate investment trust, in October 2009. From October 2009 to May 2015, Mr. Ein served as the Non-Executive Vice Chairman of Two Harbor’s board of directors. Mr. Ein is the Founder of Venturehouse Group, LLC, a holding company that creates, invests in and builds companies, and has served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 1999. Venturehouse’s portfolio includes or has included the seed investment in Matrics Technologies in August 2000 (sold to Symbol Technologies in September 2004), the lead investment in the buyout of Cibernet Corporation from the CTIA in March 2003 (sold to MACH S.à.r.l. in April 2007), the acquisition of VSGi from Net2000 Communications, and an early investment in XM Satellite Radio. He has also been the President of Leland Investments Inc., a private investment firm, since 2005. Mr. Ein is Co-Chairman of Kastle Holding Company LLC, which through its subsidiaries conducts the business of Kastle Systems, LLC, a provider of building and office security systems that was acquired in January 2007. An entity owned by Mr. Ein is also the majority owner and managing member of Kastle Holding Company LLC. In 2008, Mr. Ein founded and is the owner of the Washington Kastles, the World Team Tennis franchise in Washington, D.C., that has won the league championship six times in its nine years in the league. In March, 2017, Mr. Ein led the acquisition of World TeamTennis LLC, the professional team tennis league of which the Washington Kastles are a franchisee, from Billie Jean King and is now its Chairman. Previously in his career, Mr. Ein worked for The Carlyle Group, Brentwood Associates, and Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. Ein is the Chairman of the Board of VSGi, a provider of videoconferencing services. Mr. Ein is also the Chairman of the Board of the District of Columbia Public Education Fund and Vice President of the board of directors of the United States Tennis Association and a member of the boards of the District of Columbia College Access Program (DC-CAP) and the International Tennis Hall of Fame. He was appointed by Mayor Vincent Gray to be a member of the D.C. Tax Revision Commission and also serves on the Executive Committee of the Federal City Council. Mr. Ein received a B.S. in Economics with a concentration in Finance from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Finance and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.

We determined that Mr. Ein’s public company experience, operational experience and his business contacts qualifies him to serve as a director on Cision’s board of directors.

Stephen P. Master.  Mr. Master joined GTCR in January 2008 and became a Vice President in September 2012. Prior to joining GTCR, Mr. Master worked as an Analyst in the Telecommunications and Mergers & Acquisitions groups at UBS Investment Bank from June 2006 to December 2007. He holds an MBA with honors from the University of Chicago and a BA summa cum laude from Northwestern University in mathematical methods in the social sciences and economics. He is currently a Director of Cision, Inteliquent, Beeline and Park Place and played an instrumental role in GTCR’s investment in Landmark Aviation. He was previously a Director of Protection 1.

We determined that Mr. Master’s experience in finance and in advising similar companies qualifies him to serve as a director on Cision’s board of directors.

Stuart Yarbrough.  Mr. Yarbrough’s professional experience includes over 24 years in public accounting, primarily with Ernst & Young and BDO Seidman, LLP. Since June 2008, Mr. Yarbrough has been a private investor. From February 2007 through its final distributions during June 2008, Mr. Yarbrough served as the chief executive officer of 3Point Capital Partners, a private equity firm. From 1994 through February 2007, Mr. Yarbrough was a principal at CrossHill Financial Group Inc., a company he co-founded, which provided investment banking services and venture debt financing to growth companies. Mr. Yarbrough previously served on the board of directors of Solera Holdings, Inc. and DigitalNet Holdings, Inc., as well as several other public companies. Mr. Yarbrough has a B.A. in management sciences from Duke University.

We determined Mr. Yarbrough’s extensive practical and management experience in public accounting and corporate finance, as well as leadership expertise through his directorship roles in public companies, including service on audit and other board of directors committees, qualifies him to serve as a director on Cision’s board of directors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board Designees

The board is comprised of eight persons, including Messrs. Ein and Dryden and three persons designated by Cision Owner. Messrs. Anderson, Canfield and Master have been designated by Cision Owner as its three designees under the Nominating Agreement. There is one vacancy on the board.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of Cision’s executive officers and directors or director nominees.

Classified Board of Directors

The directors are divided into three (3) classes designated as Class I, Class II and Class III. At the 2018 annual general meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the Class I directors shall expire and Class I directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At the 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the Class II directors shall expire and Class II directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At the 2020 annual general meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the Class III directors shall expire and Class III directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At each succeeding annual general meeting of shareholders, directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years to succeed the directors of the class whose terms expire at such annual general meeting.

Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows, in each case, until their successors are elected and qualified:

Independence of Directors

As a result of its Ordinary Shares being listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Cision adheres to the rules of such exchange in determining whether a director is independent. The board of directors of Cision has consulted, and will consult, with its counsel to ensure that the board’s determinations are consistent with those rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence of directors. The New York Stock Exchange listing standards generally define an “independent director” as a person, other than an executive officer of a company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The parties have determined that Messrs. Anderson, Canfield, Ein, Dryden, Master and Yarbrough will be considered independent directors. Cision’s independent directors will have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.

Controlled Company Status

For purposes of New York Stock Exchange rules, we are a “controlled company.” Controlled companies under those rules are companies of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, a group or another company. Cision Owner controls more than 50% of the voting power of Cision’s Ordinary Shares and has certain director nomination rights. Accordingly, it is anticipated that Cision will be eligible to, and the parties intend to, take advantage of certain exemptions from corporate governance requirements provided in the New York Stock Exchange rules. Specifically, as a controlled company, Cision is not be required to have (1) a majority of independent directors, (2) a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee composed entirely of independent directors, (3) a Compensation Committee composed entirely of independent directors or (4) an annual performance evaluation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee. Cision may not have a majority of independent directors, its Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may not consist

TABLE OF CONTENTS

entirely of independent directors and such committees may not be subject to annual performance evaluations. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of listed companies that are subject to all of the applicable corporate governance requirements. In the event that Cision ceases to be a controlled company, it will be required to comply with those requirements within specified transition periods.

The controlled company exemption does not modify the independence requirements for the audit committee, and Cision must comply with the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange rules with respect thereto.

Risk Oversight

Our board of directors oversees the risk management activities designed and implemented by our management. Our board of directors executes its oversight responsibility both directly and through its committees. Our board of directors also considers specific risk topics, including risks associated with our strategic initiatives, business plans and capital structure. Our management, including our executive officers, is primarily responsible for managing the risks associated with operation and business of the company and will provide appropriate updates to the board of directors and the audit committee. Our board of directors delegates to the audit committee oversight of its risk management process, and our other committees also consider risk as they perform their respective committee responsibilities. All committees report to the board of directors as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of material or enterprise risk.

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors

Cision has established a separately standing audit committee, corporate governance and nominating committee and compensation committee.

Audit Committee Information

Cision has established an audit committee comprised of independent directors. The audit committee consists of Stuart Yarbrough, Mark D. Ein and L. Dyson Dryden. Each of the member of the audit committee is independent under the applicable listing standards. The audit committee has a written charter. The purpose of the audit committee is, among other things, to appoint, retain, set compensation of, and supervise Cision’s independent accountants, review the results and scope of the audit and other accounting related services and review Cision’s accounting practices and systems of internal accounting and disclosure controls.

Financial Experts on Audit Committee

The audit committee is and at all times will be composed exclusively of “independent directors,” as defined for audit committee members under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC, who are “financially literate.” “Financially literate” generally means being able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. In addition, Cision is required to certify to the exchange that the committee has, and will continue to have, at least one member who has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication.

Stuart Yarbrough serves as a financial expert on the Audit Committee.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Information

Cision has established a corporate governance and nominating committee of the board of directors comprised of Mark M. Anderson, L. Dyson Dryden and Stephen P. Master. Each member of the corporate governance and nominating committee is independent under the applicable listing standards. The corporate governance and nominating committee has a written charter. The corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on Cision’s board of directors.

Guidelines for Selecting Director Nominees

The corporate governance and nominating committee considers persons identified by its members, management, stockholders, investment bankers and others. The guidelines for selecting nominees, which are specified in the corporate governance and nominating committee charter, generally provide that persons to be nominated:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The corporate governance and nominating committee considers a number of qualifications relating to management and leadership experience, background and integrity and professionalism in evaluating a person’s candidacy for membership on the board of directors. The corporate governance and nominating committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board needs that arise from time to time and will also consider the overall experience and makeup of its members to obtain a broad and diverse mix of board members. The corporate governance and nominating committee does not distinguish among nominees recommended by stockholders and other persons.

Compensation Committee Information

The board of directors of Cision has established a compensation committee consisting of independent directors. The Compensation Committee consists of Mark M. Anderson, Philip A. Canfield and Mark D. Ein. The compensation committee has a written charter. The purpose of the compensation committee will be to review and approve compensation paid to Cision’s officers and directors and to administer Cision’s incentive compensation plans, including authority to make and modify awards under such plans.

Any award made pursuant to an individual subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act must consist of a committee of two or more members of the board who are Section 162(m)(4)I of “nonemployee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act.

Code of Ethics

Cision has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of its employees, officers and directors. This includes Cision’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The full text of Cision’s Code of Ethics is posted on its website at www.cision.com. Cision intends to disclose on its website any future amendments of the Code of Ethics or waivers that exempt any principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, persons performing similar functions, or Cision’s directors from provisions in the Code of Ethics.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the compensation committee is currently, or has been at any time, one of Cision’s officers or employees. None of Cision’s executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of Cision’s board of directors or compensation committee.

Shareholder and Interested Party Communications

Cision’s board of directors does not provide a process for shareholders or other interested parties to send communications to the board of directors because management believed that it was premature to develop such processes given the limited liquidity of Holdings’ Ordinary Shares at that time. However, management of Cision may establish a process for shareholder and interested party communications in the future.

Executive Compensation

The following section provides compensation information pursuant to the scaled disclosure rules applicable to “emerging growth companies” under the rules of the SEC.

Overview

Our “Named Executive Officers” for the year ended December 31, 2017 include Kevin Akeroyd, our Chief Executive Officer, and Whitney Benner and Jason Edelboim, our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2017 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our compensation policies and philosophies are designed to align compensation with business objectives and the creation of stockholder value, while also enabling us to attract, motivate and retain individuals who contribute to our long-term success. We believe our executive compensation program must be competitive in order to attract and retain executive officers. We seek to implement compensation policies and philosophies by linking a significant portion of executive officers’ cash compensation to performance objectives and have historically provided a portion of their compensation as long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards in Cision Owner.

To date, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers has consisted of a base salary, an annual cash incentive bonus, equity compensation in Cision Owner and health and welfare benefits. Pursuant to their employment agreements, the Named Executive Officers are also eligible to receive certain payments and benefits upon a termination of employment under certain circumstances. Each of our executive officers, along with certain other members of our management, have been given the opportunity to receive grants of equity in Cision Owner pursuant to the Cision Owner Partnership Agreement as further described below. GTCR established the Cision Owner Partnership Agreement to align the interests of our executive officers and management investors with those of our other equity investors and to encourage our executive officers and management investors to continue to operate the business in a manner that enhances our equity value.

Cision Owner has historically determined all of the components of compensation of our executive officers. As a publicly-traded company, our compensation committee is responsible for making compensation decisions and evaluating our compensation program as circumstances require. As part of our ongoing evaluation, it is expected that the compensation committee will apply Cision’s policies and philosophies described above.

Compensation Tables

The following table presents summary information regarding the total compensation for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 for the Named Executive Officers.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)				Stock Awards ($)(1)				Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)				All Other Compensation ($)(2)				Total ($)
Kevin Akeroyd Chief Executive Officer			2017				475,000				—				—				311,838				9,628				796,466
			2016				197,954	(3)			370,000	(4)			3,478,790	(5)			98,959				—				4,145,703
Whitney Benner Chief Human Resources Officer			2017				243,338				173,813	(6)			—				63,900				8,736				489,786
Jason Edelboim President, Americas			2017				315,000				680,912	(6)			528,449	(7)			103,477				5,861				1,633,699

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Salaries

The Named Executive Officers receive a base salary to compensate them for services rendered to our company. The base salary payable to each Named Executive Officer is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting the executive’s skill set, experience, position and responsibilities.

Non-Equity Incentive Bonuses

Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, our Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive cash bonuses based on their performance and the performance of the company and its subsidiaries. Although we do not have a formal plan in place, the board sets performance targets at the beginning of each fiscal year and communicates these targets to our Named Executive Officers. Each Named Executive Officer’s performance bonus for the year ended December 31, 2017 was determined based on achievement of Corporate and Global Revenue goals and EBITDA goals.

Incentive Unit Awards

Prior to the formation of Cision, Cision Owner granted newly-hired Named Executive Officers an interest in Cision Owner by awarding Class C Units of Cision Owner (“Class C Units”) pursuant to Cision Owner’s Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Exempted Limited Partnership (the “Cision Owner Partnership Agreement”). The Class C Units were reserved for issuance by Cision Owner for incentive purposes at the discretion of the general partner of Cision Owner, subject to certain approvals.

Class C Units were awarded to the Named Executive Officers in 2016, 2015 and 2014 for no consideration and are subject to a participation threshold determined by the general partner of Cision Owner. The Class C Units are subject to the terms of the respective agreements with the executives, but generally vest over a four-year period in annual or quarterly increments following the date of grant, contingent on the individual continuing to provide services to the company. These awards have a fixed-dollar threshold as stated in the respective award agreements that provides the holder an interest only in the appreciation in value of the company over this stated amount (a “Participation Threshold”).

Upon termination of employment of the respective holder, the unvested Class C Units are forfeited and the vested Class C Units are subject to repurchase by Cision Owner at a price equal to the fair market value of the award on the date of repurchase.

We believe that overall business success creates meaningful value to both unit holders and, through their equity holdings, Cision’s executives. The Class C Units are designed as “profits interests” within the meaning of Revenue Procedures 93 – 27 and 2001 – 43, and provide an immediate and significant alignment between our Named Executive Officers and Cision’s business. Prior to the Business Combination, Cision Owner followed the practice of awarding Class C Units at or near the time of hire and when deemed appropriate to further demonstrate commitment and reinforcement of value creation. The number of Class C Units granted to each of Cision’s Named Executive Officers was not determined pursuant to any formulaic equation or benchmarking to any peer groups; rather, the number of Class C Units was determined by the general partner of Cision Owner in its sole discretion, after taking into account discussions with the Cision management team and overall retention goals.

As profits interests, the Class C Units have no value for tax purposes on the date of grant, but instead are designed to gain value only after Cision Owner has realized a certain level of returns for the holders of its “Class A Units” (as defined in Cision Owner Partnership Agreement). Distributions will be made first to holders of Class A Units until those holders have received a full return on their capital contributions to Cision Owner plus a specified yield calculated in accordance with the Cision Owner Partnership Agreement. Once Class A Unit holders have received these amounts, the holders of Class C Units are generally entitled to participate in any distributions together with the holders of Cision Owner’s “Class B Units” (as defined in the Cision Owner Partnership Agreement) in the proportions set forth in the Cision Owner Partnership Agreement, provided that no Class C Unit is entitled to any portion of a distribution until the Participation Threshold with respect to such unit has been realized. The threshold value of each Class C Unit is based on the liquidation value of the equity of Cision Owner at the date of the grant.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Our shareholders adopted and approved an omnibus incentive plan (the “2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) in connection with the Business Combination. During the year ended December 31, 2017, Jason Edelboim was our only Named Executive Officer who received grants under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year End — Interests in Cision Owner

The following table summarizes, for each of the Named Executive Officers, the number of Class C Units of Cision Owner held as of December 31, 2017.

Name and Principal Position		# Shares or Units of Stock that have not vested (#)(1)				Market Value # Share or Units of Stock that have not vested ($)(2)				# Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not vested (#)				Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or other Rights that have not vested ($)
Kevin Akeroyd, CEO			1,932,299	(3)			5,352,468				—				—
Whitney Benner Chief Human Resources Officer			168,750	(4)			467,438				—				—
Jason Edelboim President, Americas			168,750	(4)			467,438				—				—

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year End — Cision Ltd. Equity Awards

The following table summarizes, for each of the Named Executive Officers, the number of Cision Ltd. equity awards held as of December 31, 2017.

Name and Principal Position		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number Of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date
Kevin Akeroyd, CEO			—				—				—				—				—
Whitney Benner Chief Human Resources Officer			—				—				—				—				—
Jason Edelboim President, Americas			—				82,500	(1)			—			$	12.78				September 22, 2027

Post-Retirement Benefits Cision US Inc. Retirement Plan

We maintain a tax-qualified defined contribution plan meeting the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, commonly called a 401(k) plan, for substantially all of our U.S. employees through Fidelity. The 401(k) plan is available on the same terms to all of our U.S. employees, including the Named Executive Officers. Each participant can elect to contribute from 0% to 100% of his or her base salary to the 401(k) plan, subject to Internal Revenue Service and ERISA limitations. We also make matching 401(k) contributions up to a specified portion of each employee’s salary. The deferred amount is invested in accordance with the election of the participant in a variety of investment choices.

Employment Agreements

Each of the Named Executive Officers is a party to an employment agreement. Mr. Akeroyd’s employment agreement is between himself and Cision US Inc. (“Cision US”). Ms. Benner’s employment agreement is between herself and PR Newswire Association, LLC (“PR Newswire”). Mr. Edelboim’s employment agreement is between himself and PR Newswire. The following summary sets forth the material terms of the Named Executive Officer’s existing employment agreements.

Kevin Akeroyd

The employment agreement with Kevin Akeroyd provides that Mr. Akeroyd will serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Cision US. The term of Mr. Akeroyd’s employment commenced on August 1, 2016 and will continue until (i) Mr. Akeroyd’s resignation, death or disability or (ii) Cision terminates his employment with or without Cause. On June 29, 2017, in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Cision US entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. Akeroyd in order to remove Cision Owner as a party to Mr. Akeroyd’s employment agreement. The terms of Mr. Akeroyd’s employment were not substantially modified by such amendment. Mr. Akeroyd’s base salary is set at $475,000 per year and is subject to annual increase as approved by Cision’s board of directors.

Subject to continued employment, Mr. Akeroyd will be eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount up to 100% of his base salary, as determined by Cision’s board of directors based upon Mr. Akeroyd’s performance and the performance of Cision, Cision US and the other subsidiaries of Cision relative to financial, operating and other objectives mutually agreed upon by Cision’s board of directors and Mr. Akeroyd. In addition, Mr. Akeroyd is entitled to such other benefits as are approved by Cision’s board of directors and made generally available to all senior management of Cision and Cision US.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If Mr. Akeroyd’s employment is terminated for any reason, Mr. Akeroyd is entitled to receive:

If Mr. Akeroyd’s employment is terminated by resignation with Good Reason or by Cision’s board of directors without Cause, then, in addition to the Akeroyd Accrued Obligations, during the 12-month period commencing on the date of termination (the “Akeroyd Severance Period”), (x) Cision US shall pay to Mr. Akeroyd an aggregate amount equal to 100% of his annual base salary, and (y) Cision US shall pay the premiums for Mr. Akeroyd’s continued coverage under Cision US’s health benefit plan during the Akeroyd Severance Period (subject to certain limitations).

In the event of Mr. Akeroyd’s resignation, if at the time of such resignation Cision US had the right to terminate Mr. Akeroyd’s employment with Cause, then Cision US may elect to treat such resignation as a termination of Mr. Akeroyd’s employment by Cision US with Cause.

Mr. Akeroyd’s employment agreement also contains provisions relating to obligations to maintain confidentiality, ownership of property developed during employment, third-party information, use of information of prior employers and non-solicitation of Cision US’s employees for a period of 12 months.

For purposes of Mr. Akeroyd’s employment agreement:

“Cause” means (i) (a) the conviction or plea of no contest for or indictment on a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or (b) the commission of any other act or omission involving (x) dishonesty that is reasonably likely to materially and adversely affect Cision or any of its subsidiaries or (y) fraud, in either case, with respect to Parent, Cision US or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their customers, vendors or employees, (ii) substantial and repeated failure to perform duties of the office held by Mr. Akeroyd as reasonably and expressly directed by Cision’s board of directors, provided that Mr. Akeroyd shall have the opportunity to address Cision’s board of directors before a termination pursuant to this clause (ii) becomes effective, (iii) gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to the Cision, Cision US or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their customers, vendors or employees, (iv) conduct which could reasonably be expected to bring Cision, Cision US or any of their respective subsidiaries into substantial public disgrace or disrepute, (v) any breach by Mr. Akeroyd of the confidentiality or non-solicitation provisions of his agreement and/or (vi) a failure to observe Cision’s, Cision US’s or any of their respective subsidiaries’ policies or standards regarding employment practices (including, without limitation, nondiscrimination and sexual harassment policies) as approved by Cision’s board of directors from time to time.

“Good Reason” means (i) a material reduction in Mr. Akeroyd’s then effective annual base salary, (ii) a material diminution in Mr. Akeroyd’s title, (iii) the assignment of duties to Mr. Akeroyd materially inconsistent with his position or (iv) the relocation by Cision US of Mr. Akeroyd’s principal office to a location which is more than 50 miles outside of the San Jose metropolitan area, in each case, without the prior written consent of Mr. Akeroyd.

Whitney Benner

The employment agreement with Whitney Benner provides that Ms. Benner will serve as the Chief Human Resources Officer of PR Newswire. The term of Ms. Benner’s employment will continue until (i) Ms. Benner’s resignation (upon 30 days’ prior written notice to PR Newswire), death or disability or (ii) PR Newswire terminates her employment with or without Cause. On January 9, 2018, PR Newswire

TABLE OF CONTENTS

entered into an amended employment agreement with Ms. Benner in order to remove Cision Owner as a party to Ms. Benner’s employment agreement. The terms of Ms. Benner’s employment were not substantially modified by such amendment.

For each fiscal year beginning in 2017, subject to continued employment through the last day of such fiscal year, Ms. Benner will be eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount up to 40% of her base salary, as determined by PR Newswire based upon Ms. Benner’s performance and the performance of PR Newswire and its subsidiaries relative to financial, operating and other objectives set by PR Newswire. In addition, Ms. Benner is entitled to such other benefits as are approved by PR Newswire and made generally available to all senior management of PR Newswire.

If Ms. Benner’s employment is terminated for any reason, Ms. Benner is entitled to receive:

If Ms. Benner’s employment is terminated by PR Newswire without Cause, then, in addition to the Benner Accrued Obligations, (1) PR Newswire will give Ms. Benner three months prior notice of such termination, during which period Ms. Benner will assist as reasonably required by PR Newswire to transition her duties and train any successor, and during which period PR Newswire may, in its absolute discretion, (A) place Ms. Benner on garden leave and require Ms. Benner not to come into the office, or (B) elect to provide Ms. Benner payment of her base salary and premiums for continued coverage under PR Newswire’s health benefit plans in lieu of all or any portion of such three month notice period, which payment shall be made in installments on PR Newswire’s regular payroll dates unless otherwise agreed between Ms. Benner and PR Newswire and during which time no bonus eligibility will accrue; (2) during the nine month period commencing on the date of termination, PR Newswire shall continue to pay Ms. Benner at her base salary rate, payable in equal installments on PR Newswire’s regular salary payment dates as in effect on the date of the separation (the “Benner Severance Payments” and any period during which the Benner Severance Payments are payable, each a “Benner Severance Period”); and (3) PR Newswire shall pay the premiums for Ms. Benner’s continued coverage under PR Newswire’s health benefit plans during the Benner Severance Period (subject to certain limitations, the “Benner Severance Benefits”). In addition, PR Newswire shall have the option, by delivering written notice to Ms. Benner at least 60 days prior to the end of the then applicable Benner Severance Period, to extend the Benner Severance Period for up to two additional six month periods (i.e., through the 21 month anniversary of the date of separation) during which period PR Newswire shall continue to pay the Benner Severance Payments at the same annual rate (pro-rated as applicable) and provide the Benner Severance Benefits.

Ms. Benner’s employment agreement also contains provisions relating to obligations to maintain confidentiality, ownership of property developed during employment, third-party information and use of information of prior employers, as well as non-competition and non-solicitation covenants which remain in effect during the term of Ms. Benner’s employment plus either (i) the Benner Severance Period, if she is terminated without Cause, or (ii) the 12-month period immediately following Ms. Benner’s termination, if she is terminated under any other circumstance.

For purposes of Ms. Benner’s employment agreement:

“Cause” means (i) the commission of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or the commission of any other act or omission involving dishonesty or fraud with respect to PR Newswire, Cision or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their customers, vendors or employees, (ii) substantial and repeated failure to perform duties of the office held by Ms. Benner as reasonably directed by an executive to whom Ms. Benner

TABLE OF CONTENTS

directly or indirectly reports or by PR Newswire, (iii) gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to PR Newswire, Cision or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their customers, vendors or employees, (iv) conduct which could reasonably be expected to bring PR Newswire, Cision or any of their respective subsidiaries into substantial public disgrace or disrepute, (v) any breach by Ms. Benner of the confidentiality, non-competition or non-solicitation provisions of her agreement and/or (vi) a failure to observe policies or standards regarding employment practices (including, without limitation, nondiscrimination and sexual harassment policies) as approved by PR Newswire from time to time.

Jason Edelboim

The employment agreement with Jason Edelboim provides that Mr. Edelboim will serve as the President, PRN Americas, of PR Newswire. The term of Mr. Edelboim’s employment will continue until (i) Mr. Edelboim’s resignation (upon 30 days’ prior written notice to PR Newswire), death or disability or (ii) PR Newswire terminates his employment with or without Cause. On October 3, 2017, PR Newswire entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. Edelboim in order to remove Cision Owner as a party to Mr. Edelboim’s employment agreement. The terms of Mr. Edelboim’s employment were not substantially modified by such amendment.

For fiscal year 2016, subject in its entirety without pro-ration to continued employment through the last day of 2016, Mr. Edelboim was eligible for an annual bonus in an amount up $165,006. For each fiscal year beginning in 2017, subject to continued employment through the last day of such fiscal year, Mr. Edelboim will be eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount up to 50% of his base salary, as determined by PR Newswire based upon Mr. Edelboim’s performance and the performance of PR Newswire and its subsidiaries relative to financial, operating and other objectives set by PR Newswire. On June 16, 2018 (the “Retention Bonus Date”), Mr. Edelboim will also receive (i) a one-time cash bonus in an amount of $150,000 (such bonus, the “Time Based Component”) and (ii) a one-time cash bonus in the amount of $150,000 (such amount, the “Performance Based Component”), in recognition of having achieved the management best case performance for revenue and EBITDA as disclosed to Cision US in connection with the sale of PR Newswire to Cision US; in each case subject to Mr. Edelboim’s continued employment with PR Newswire through and on the Retention Bonus Date. If PR Newswire terminates Mr. Edelboim without Cause prior to the Retention Bonus Date, Mr. Edelboim will receive (i) a pro-rated portion, to the extent earned, of the Time Based Component, and (ii) 100% of the Performance Based Component, in each case, as a lump sum payment payable within 30 days of such without Cause termination. In addition, Mr. Edelboim is entitled to such other benefits as are approved by PR Newswire and made generally available to all senior management of PR Newswire.

If Mr. Edelboim’s employment is terminated for any reason, Mr. Edelboim is entitled to receive:

If Mr. Edelboim’s employment is terminated by PR Newswire without Cause, then, in addition to the Edelboim Accrued Obligations, (1) PR Newswire will give Mr. Edelboim three months prior notice of such termination, during which period Mr. Edelboim will assist as reasonably required by PR Newswire to transition his duties and train any successor, and during which period (x) PR Newswire will continue to pay Mr. Edelboim’s base salary and premiums for continued coverage under PR Newswire’s health benefit plans (which payment shall be made in installments on PR Newswire’s regular payroll dates unless otherwise agreed between Mr. Edelboim and PR Newswire), (y) no bonus eligibility will accrue for the entire calendar year in which Mr. Edelboim has been terminated and (z) PR Newswire may, in its absolute discretion, place Mr. Edelboim on garden leave and require Mr. Edelboim not to come into the office; (2) during the nine

TABLE OF CONTENTS

month period commencing on the date of termination, PR Newswire shall continue to pay Mr. Edelboim at his base salary rate, payable in equal installments on PR Newswire’s regular salary payment dates as in effect on the date of the separation (the “Edelboim Severance Payments” and any period during which the Edelboim Severance Payments are payable, each a “Edelboim Severance Period”); (3) PR Newswire shall pay the premiums for Mr. Edelboim’s continued coverage under PR Newswire’s health benefit plans during the Edelboim Severance Period (subject to certain limitations, the Edelboim Severance Benefits”); and (4) PR Newswire shall provide reimbursement of Mr. Edelboim’s reasonable documented costs for outplacement, career search, executive coaching or similar services, comparable to what has been customarily provided to similarly situated executives of PR Newswire, and such reimbursement shall be made to Mr. Edelboim by PR Newswire within 30 days after presentation of such costs, in accordance with PR Newswire’s company policy, to PR Newswire. In addition, PR Newswire shall have the option, by delivering written notice to Mr. Edelboim at least 60 days prior to the end of the then applicable Edelboim Severance Period, to extend the Edelboim Severance Period for up to two additional six month periods (i.e., through the 21 month anniversary of the date of separation) during which period PR Newswire shall continue to pay the Edelboim Severance Payments at the same annual rate (pro-rated as applicable) and provide the Edelboim Severance Benefits.

Mr. Edelboim’s employment agreement also contains provisions relating to obligations to maintain confidentiality, ownership of property developed during employment, third-party information and use of information of prior employers, as well as non-competition and non-solicitation covenants which remain in effect during the term of Mr. Edelboim’s employment plus either (i) the Edelboim Severance Period, if he is terminated without Cause, or (ii) the 12-month period immediately following Mr. Edelboim’s termination if he is terminated under any other circumstance.

The definition of “Cause” in Mr. Edelboim’s employment agreement is substantially identical to the definition of “Cause” in Ms. Benner’s employment agreement, described above.

Director Compensation

No directors received compensation for their services as director for the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

The following description of the material terms of the share capital of Cision includes a summary of specified provisions of the charter documents of Cision in effect. This description is qualified by reference to Cision’s charter documents as currently in effect, copies of which are attached to the registration statement of which this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange constitutes a part.

General

Cision is a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. Its affairs are governed by its Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (the “Articles”) and the Companies Law.

The authorized share capital of Cision is US$50,000 consisting of 480,000,000 Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 20,000,000 preferred shares of par value US$0.0001 per share. As of May 8, there were 124,370,566 ordinary share issued and outstanding and no preferred shares have been issued or are outstanding.

Shares

General

Walkers, Cayman Islands counsel to Cision, has confirmed that all of the issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares of Cision are fully paid and non-assessable. Certificates representing the outstanding Ordinary Shares are generally not issued and legal title to the issued shares is recorded in registered form in the register of members. Holders of Ordinary Shares have no pre-emptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights.

Preferred Shares

The board of directors of Cision may provide for other classes of shares, including series of preferred shares, out of the authorized but unissued share capital, which could be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise capital for corporate purposes or for use in employee benefit plans. Such additional classes of shares shall have such voting powers (full or limited or without voting powers), designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as may be determined by the board of directors. If any preferred shares are issued, the rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Ordinary Shares will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of such preferred shares.

Dividends

The holders of Ordinary Shares are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors, subject to the Companies Law and the Articles. Dividends and other distributions on issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares may be paid out of the funds of Cision lawfully available for such purpose, subject to any preference of any outstanding preferred shares. Dividends and other distributions will be distributed among the holders of Ordinary Shares on a pro rata basis.

Voting Rights

Each ordinary share entitles the holder to one vote on all matters upon which the Ordinary Shares are entitled to vote. Voting at any shareholders’ meeting is by show of hands, unless voting by way of poll demanded by the chairman of the board of directors or any shareholder present or voting by proxy.

A quorum required for a meeting of shareholders requires the presence in person or by proxy of persons holding in aggregate not less than a simple majority of all voting share capital of Cision in issue, provided that for so long as Cision is a Controlled Company within the meaning of the rules of the then Designated Stock Exchange, general meetings shall not be quorate unless Cision Owner is in attendance (provided that Cision Owner holds shares in Cision).

A special resolution will be required for important matters such as a merger or consolidation of Cision, change of name or making changes to the Articles or the voluntary winding up of Cision.

An ordinary resolution of the shareholders of Cision requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast at a quorate general meeting, while a special resolution requires the affirmative vote of no less than two-thirds of the votes cast at a quorate general meeting or, in each case, a unanimous resolution in writing.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Variation of Rights

The rights attached to any class of shares (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of that class), such as voting, dividends and the like, may be varied only with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a general meeting or by the written consent of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of that class or with the sanction of a resolution passed by a majority of not less than two thirds of the votes cast at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class. The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class shall not (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of that class) be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking in priority to or pari passu with such previously existing shares.

Transfer of Ordinary Shares

Any shareholder may transfer all or any of his or her Ordinary Shares by an instrument of transfer in the usual or common form or any other form prescribed by the Designated Stock Exchange or as otherwise approved by the board of directors.

In addition, the Articles prohibit the transfer of shares in breach of the rules or regulations of the Designated Stock Exchange or any relevant securities laws (including the Exchange Act).

Liquidation

On a return of capital on winding up or otherwise (other than on conversion, redemption or purchase of Ordinary Shares), assets available for distribution among the holders of Ordinary Shares shall be distributed among the holders of the Ordinary Shares on a pro rata basis.

Directors

Appointment and Removal

The management of Cision is vested in a board of directors. The Articles provide that there shall be a board of directors consisting of eight (8) directors, unless increased or decreased from time to time by the directors or by Cision in general meeting, provided that, for so long as Cision Owner has the right to nominate any director for election pursuant to the Articles, the size of the board of directors shall not be increased or decreased without the prior written consent of Cision Owner. The board consists of seven (7) directors and has one vacancy. So long as shares are listed on the Designated Stock Exchange, the board of directors shall include such number of “independent directors” as the relevant rules applicable to the listing of any shares on the Designated Stock Exchange require (subject to any applicable exceptions for Controlled Companies).

The directors are divided into three (3) classes designated as Class I, Class II and Class III, respectively. At the 2018 annual general meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the Class I directors shall expire and Class I directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At the 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the Class II directors shall expire and Class II directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At the 2020 annual general meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the Class III directors shall expire and Class III directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years. At each succeeding annual general meeting of shareholders, directors shall be elected for a full term of three (3) years to succeed the directors of the class whose terms expire at such annual general meeting.

The directors of Cision have the power from time to time and at any time to appoint any person as a director to fill a casual vacancy on the board of directors or as an addition to the existing board of directors, subject to the remaining provisions of the Articles, the terms of the Nominating Agreement, applicable law and the listing rules of the Designated Stock Exchange; provided that, subject to the terms of the Nominating Agreement, any vacancy not filled by the directors may be filled by the shareholders by ordinary resolution at the next annual general meeting or extraordinary general meeting called for that purpose; provided further, that, subject to the terms of the Nominating Agreement, whenever the holders of any class or classes of share or series thereof are entitled to elect one or more directors by the provisions of the Articles, vacancies and newly created directorships of such class or classes or series may be filled by a majority of the directors elected by such class or classes or series thereof then in office, or by a sole remaining director so elected or by the holders of such class or classes of shares or series thereof in accordance with the Articles. Any director so appointed shall hold office until the expiration of the term of such class of directors or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A director may be removed from office by the shareholders by special resolution only for “cause” (as defined in the Articles); provided that, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Articles, (x) until the date of the 2020 annual general meeting of the shareholders (and not thereafter), any director may be removed with or without cause upon the affirmative vote of the Cision Owner if the Cision Owner and its affiliates beneficially own at least 50% of the issued Ordinary Shares and (y) any director who was nominated for election by the Cision Owner may be removed with or without cause upon the affirmative vote of the Cision Owner for so long as the Cision Owner has the right to nominate such director for election pursuant to the Articles.

A vacancy on the board of directors created by the removal of a director under the provisions of the Articles may be filled by the election or appointment by ordinary resolution at the general meeting at which such director is removed or by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the remaining directors present and voting at a meeting of the directors.

The appointment and removal of directors is subject to the applicable rules of the Designated Stock Exchange and to the provisions of the Nominating Agreement.

The detailed procedures for the nomination of persons proposed to be elected as directors at any general meeting of Cision are set out in the Articles.

Indemnity of Directors and Officers

The Articles provide that the board of directors and officers shall be indemnified from and against all liability which they incur in execution of their duty in their respective offices, except liability incurred by reason of such director’s or officer’s actual fraud or willful default.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Transactions Policy

Cision has adopted a Related Party Transactions policy that sets forth the manner in with Cision considers, evaluates and, where appropriate, conducts transactions with Related Parties, which are defined as: (a) each director or officer of Cision; (b) any nominee for election as a director of Cision; (c) any security holder who is known to Cision to own of record or beneficially more than five percent (5%) of any class of Cision’s voting securities; and (d) any “Immediate Family Member” (as defined in Regulation S-K Item 404(a)) of any of the foregoing persons. For purposes of the Related Party Transactions policy, a “Related Party Transaction” means a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which Cision was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, and in which any Related Party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest (including any transactions requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Any director, nominee for election as a director or officer who intends to enter into a Related Party Transaction shall disclose that intention and all material facts with respect to such transaction to the Audit Committee, and any other employee of Cision who intends to cause Cision to enter into any Related Party Transaction shall disclose that intention and all material facts with respect to the transaction to his or her superior, who shall be responsible for seeing that such information is reported to the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee reviews all Related Party Transactions and approves or disapproves such transactions in advance of such transaction being given effect (subject to any permissible delegation of authority). The Audit Committee may approve the Related Party Transaction only if the Audit Committee determines in good faith that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In connection with approving or ratifying a Related Party Transaction, the Audit Committee shall carefully and diligently consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances relating to whether the transaction is in the best interests of Cision, including consideration of the following factors: the position within or relationship of the Related Party with Cision; the materiality of the transaction to the Related Party and Cision, including the dollar value of the transaction, without regard to profit or loss; the business purpose for and reasonableness of the transaction (including the anticipated profit or loss from the transaction), taken in the context of the alternatives available to Cision for attaining the purposes of the transaction; whether the transaction is comparable to a transaction that could be available with an unrelated party, or is on terms that Cision offers generally to persons who are not Related Parties; whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of Cision’s business and was proposed and considered in the ordinary course of business; the effect of the transaction on Cision’s business and operations, including on Cision’s internal control over financial reporting and system of disclosure controls or procedures; any additional conditions or controls (including reporting and review requirements) that should be applied to such transaction; whether the Related Party Transaction was initiated by Cision or the Related Party; the Related Party’s interest in the Related Party Transaction; and any other information regarding the Related Party Transaction or the Related Party that would be material to investors in light of the circumstances of the particular transaction.

These procedures are intended to determine whether any Related Party Transaction impairs the independence of a director or presents a conflict of interest on the part of a directors, employee or officer.

Professional Services Agreement

On May 30, 2014, Canyon Valor Companies, Inc. (formerly GTCR Valor Companies, Inc.), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Cision (“Cision Sub”), entered into an Amended and Restated Professional Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with Cision Owner, GTCR LLC and GTCR Management X LP (“GTCR Management”) pursuant to which Cision Sub agreed to engage GTCR Management as a financial and management consultant.

Under the terms of the Services Agreement, GTCR Management provides various services to Cision Owner and its subsidiaries, including Cision Sub, such as corporate strategy, budgeting of future corporate investments and acquisition and divestiture strategies.

GTCR Management is entitled to a placement fee in connection with any equity or debt financing of Cision Owner or any of its subsidiaries (regardless of whether such financing is provided by GTCR Management or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

any of its affiliates), subject to certain exceptions. The Services Agreement also requires Cision Sub to pay an annual management fee to GTCR Management, unless such amounts are not permitted to be paid under the agreements governing Cision’s 2016 First Lien Credit Facility and 2016 Second Lien Credit Facility, in which case such fees automatically accrue without interest for the benefit of GTCR Management, to be paid at such time as and to the extent that such fees are permitted to be paid under such credit facilities. Cision Sub is also required to reimburse GTCR Management for reasonable travel expenses, legal fees and other out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by GTCR Management or its affiliates in connection with the performance of its obligations under the Services Agreement. Cision Sub has also agreed to indemnify GTCR Management and its affiliates for any losses or liabilities they incur in connection with their performance under the Services Agreement, except to the extent resulting from GTCR Management’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. Cision Sub paid fees and expense reimbursement to GTCR Management in an aggregate amount of $0.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Cision and GTCR Management terminated the Services Agreement in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination.

Intercompany Capital Contributions and Loan Agreements

Prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, Cision from time to time engaged in intercompany transactions with Cision Owner, including intercompany loans. In connection with the acquisition of Bulletin Intelligence, on March 24, 2017, in exchange for a note, Cision Owner issued $7.0 million of Units of Cision Owner to a subsidiary of Cision, which Units were used as consideration for the purchase of Bulletin Intelligence. The note was repaid to Cision Owner in connection with consummation of the Business Combination.

In connection with the acquisition of PR Newswire on June 16, 2016, Cision Owner loaned $195.9 million to Cision and issued $40.0 million of Units of Cision Owner to a subsidiary of Cision, which cash and Units were used to fund the PR Newswire acquisition. Cision Owner contributed these loans to Cision in exchange for CPECs, resulting in the cancellation of these loans.

From time to time prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, Cision also issued CPECs to Cision Owner in connection with capital contributions from Cision Owner to Cision.

See “— Convertible Preferred Equity Certificates of Cision (CPECs)” and Note 2 to the Cision’s audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange for a description of the CPECs. In connection with the Business Combination, Cision Owner contributed the CPECs, along with its outstanding equity in Cision, to Cision.

Convertible Preferred Equity Certificates of Cision (CPECs)

Between April 2014 and July 2016, Cision Owner entered into 11 Subscription Agreements with Cision Luxco pursuant to which Cision Luxco issued and sold Convertible Preferred Equity Certificates (“CPECs”) to Cision Owner. The CPEC’s were redeemable at any time by Cision Luxco and matured 49 years from the date of issuance. In connection with the Business Combination, Cision Owner contributed the CPECs, along with its outstanding equity in Cision Luxco, to Cision.

Gorkana Seller Notes and Management Rollover

In connection with the completion of Cision’s acquisition of Gorkana on October 21, 2014, GTCR Canyon UK Investments Limited, a subsidiary of Cision, acquired Gorkana and issued promissory notes to the sellers of Gorkana, including to Jeremy Thompson, who served as our President, EMEA, until his separation on May 31, 2017. A portion of the notes were denominated in US dollars and a portion were denominated in pounds sterling. Notes in the amounts of $617,971 and £1,726,272 were issued to Mr. Thompson. The US dollar-denominated notes bore interest at a rate of 8% per annum and were payable on demand. The pounds sterling-denominated notes were secured by the value of a cash collateral account and bore interest equal to the interest paid on the underlying cash collateral account. Concurrently with the issuance of the notes, Mr. Thompson, Cision Owner and certain of its affiliates entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to which Mr. Thompson agreed to contribute the notes to Cision Luxco in exchange for equivalent notes issued by Cision Luxco (the “Lux Notes”).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On December 22, 2014, Cision Owner and Cision entered into an Investment Agreement with Mr. Thompson pursuant to which he agreed to contribute the Lux Notes to Cision in exchange for securities of Cision (the “Cision Shares”) and a portion in exchange for equivalent notes of Cision (the “Cision Notes”). On September 18, 2015, Cision Owner issued Units in Cision Owner (an aggregate deemed capital contribution of $662,939) to Mr. Thompson in exchange for the Cision Shares held by him. On December 21, 2015, Cision repaid the pounds sterling-denominated notes to Mr. Thompson in the amount of £1,726,272.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as of May 2, 2018 regarding the beneficial ownership of Cision’s Ordinary Shares by:

Unless otherwise indicated, Cision believes that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Ordinary Shares beneficially owned by them.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Approximate Percentage of Outstanding Ordinary Shares(2)
Directors and Executive Officers
Kevin Akeroyd			—	(3)			—
Whitney Benner			—	(3)			—
Jason Edelboim			—	(3)			—
Mark D. Ein			8,454,412	(4)			6.6	%
L. Dyson Dryden			2,818,137	(5)			2.2	%
Stephen P. Master			—(6)(7)				—
Stuart Yarbrough			—				—
Mark M. Anderson			—(6)(7)				—
Philip A. Canfield			—(6)(7)				—
All directors and executive officers as a group (16 individuals)			13,007,818	(3)(8)			10.0	%
Five Percent Holders:
Cision Owner			80,370,050	(6)			63.6	%
Capital Acquisition Management 3 LLC			8,454,412	(9)			6.6	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the Ordinary Shares covered by this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange has been passed upon for us by Walkers, Cayman Islands.

EXPERTS

The financial statements of Cision Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 included in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

The combined financial statements of PRN Group as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and the combined financial statements of PRN Group as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014 included in this Prospectus and Registration Statement, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The financial statements of Capitol as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 included in this Prospectus and Registration Statement have been audited by Marcum LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance on such report given on the authority of such firm as an expert in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. This Prospectus/Offer to Exchange is part of a registration statement, but does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement or the exhibits. You may read and copy the registration statement and any other document that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the internet at a website maintained by the SEC located at http://www.sec.gov.

We will provide, without charge, upon written request or oral request, a copy of any or all of the documents that are exhibits to the registration statement. Such requests should be directed to Cision Ltd. at 130 E Randolph Street, 7^th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601 or (312) 922-2400.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Introduction

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the year ended December 31, 2017 combines the historical consolidated statement of operations of Cision Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2017 with financial information of Capitol for the period from January 1, 2017 to June 29, 2017, the closing date of the Business Combination, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on January 1, 2017.

The historical financial information of Cision was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Cision for the year ended December 31, 2017 included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. The historical financial information of Capitol was derived from financial information of Capitol for the period from January 1, 2017 to June 29, 2017 included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange. This information should be read together with Cision’s and Capitol’s financial statements and related notes, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other financial information included elsewhere in this Prospectus/Offer to Exchange.

Description of the Business Combination

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, all of the share capital and CPECs in Cision Luxco were contributed to Holdings, in exchange for 82,100,000 ordinary shares of Holdings and 2,000,000 warrants to purchase ordinary shares of Holdings. Following the Contribution and Exchange, Merger Sub merged with and into Capitol, with Capitol surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings. In connection with the Business Combination, each outstanding share of common stock of Capitol was exchanged into a like number ordinary shares of Holdings. The outstanding warrants of Capitol, by their terms, automatically entitled the holders to purchase ordinary shares of Holdings upon consummation of the business combination. The Sponsors forfeited 1,600,000 shares of Capitol’s common stock and warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Capitol common stock at the closing of the Business Combination.

The Merger Agreement contains a provision pursuant to which Holdings may issue up to 6,000,000 additional ordinary shares to Cision Owner, issued in 2,000,000 share increments, for the achievement of specified share price thresholds of $13.00, $16.00 and $19.00 between the closing date of the Business Combination and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Business Combination. The first such 2,000,000 ordinary share increment was issued to Cision Owner on November 3, 2017 in connection with the achievement of the $13.00 price threshold.

Accounting for the Business Combination

The Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse merger in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Under this method of accounting, Capitol was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. This determination was primarily based on Cision Luxco stockholders having a majority of the voting power of the combined company, Cision Luxco comprising the ongoing operations of the combined entity, Cision Luxco comprising a majority of the governing body of the combined company, and Cision Luxco’s senior management comprising the senior management of the combined company. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the Business Combination was treated as the equivalent of Cision Luxco issuing stock for the net assets of Capitol, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of Capitol were stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded. Operations prior to the Business Combination were those of Cision Luxco.

As the issuance of the 4,000,000 of additional ordinary shares to Cision Owner is contingent on the future performance of Holdings’ share price, they have been classified as an equity arrangement and therefore have not been recorded in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Basis of Pro Forma Presentation

The historical financial information has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to events that are related and/or directly attributable to the Business Combination, are factually supportable and, with respect to the pro forma statement of operations, are expected to have a continuing impact on the results of the combined company. The adjustments presented on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been identified and presented to provide relevant information necessary for an accurate understanding of the combined company upon consummation of the Business Combination.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different had the companies always been combined. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results that the combined company will experience. Cision Luxco and Capitol have not had any historical relationship prior to the Business Combination. Accordingly, no pro forma adjustments were required to eliminate activities between the companies.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not include pro forma adjustments for the acquisition of Bulletin Intelligence and the sale of the Vintage business by Cision Luxco in March 2017, or the acquisition of Argus, which occurred in the second quarter of 2017, as these transactions were not considered material to an understanding of Cision Luxco and a stockholder’s vote on the Business Combination.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared on the basis that no Capitol stockholders exercised conversion rights with respect to their public shares upon the consummation of the Business Combination. In connection with the Business Combination, Holders of 490,078 shares of Capitol common stock sold in its initial public offering exercised their rights to convert those shares to cash at a conversion price of approximately $10.04 per share, or an aggregate of approximately $4.9 million; however, the impact of these conversions was considered immaterial to the calculation of unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

Included in the shares outstanding and weighted average shares outstanding as presented in the pro forma condensed combined financial statements are an aggregate of 82,100,000 ordinary shares issued to Cision Owner.

As a result of the Business Combination, Cision Owner owned approximately 68% of Holdings’ ordinary shares outstanding immediately after the Business Combination, and the Capitol stockholders owed approximately 32% of Holdings’ outstanding ordinary shares, based on the number of Capitol common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2016 (in each case, not giving effect to any shares issuable to them upon exercise of their warrants).

The Business Combination resulted in the exchange of Class C Units by Cision Owner for vested and unvested common stock of Holdings. The recapitalization does not constitute a change in control of Cision and so there will be no change in the existing vesting schedules or value of the awards. Equity-based compensation expense will continue to be recognized in the post combination period, based on the corresponding remaining vesting periods. As a result, no adjustment has been made in the pro forma financial statements related to the continued recognition of equity based compensation expense related to the Class C Units.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)

		(A) Cision				(B) Capitol				Pro Forma Adjustments				Pro Forma Income Statement
Revenue		$	631,637			$	—			$	—			$	631,637
Cost of revenue			200,836				—				—				200,836
Gross Profit			430,801				—				—				430,801
Operating costs and expenses:
Sales and marketing			114,750				—				—				114,750
Research and development			22,102				—				—				22,102
General and administrative			166,759				4,565				(13,482	)(4)			157,842
Amortization of intangibles			89,159				—				—				89,159
Total operating costs and expenses			392,770				4,565				(13,482	)			383,853
Operating loss			38,031				(4,565	)			13,482				46,948
Other income (expense):
Foreign exchange gains			(5,458	)			—				—				(5,458	)
Interest income and other income (expense)			2,132				800				(800	)(1)			2,132
Interest expense			(116,466	)			—				16,950	(2)			(99,516	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt			(51,872	)			—				—				(51,872	)
Loss before income taxes			(133,633	)			(3,765	)			29,632				(107,766	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes			(10,591	)			—				(13,072	)(3)			(23,663	)
Net loss		$	(123,042	)		$	(3,765	)		$	42,704			$	(84,103	)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted			75,696,880								45,393,810	(5)			123,090,690
Basic and diluted net loss per share		$	(1.63	)										$	(0.68	)